If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Duplicate of another approved link: 7924655


(Guardian)   Van Gogh painting that was a Van Gogh painting then wasn't a Van Gogh painting is once again a Van Gogh painting. You can tell by the pixels   (theguardian.com) divider line 5
    More: Cool, Van Gogh, Norwegian, Van Gogh Museum, pixels, Pennsylvania Dutch  
•       •       •

228 clicks; Favorite

5 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2013-09-09 03:56:15 PM
 
2013-09-09 03:58:28 PM
 
2013-09-09 04:00:33 PM
Ah.  So.  Well then.

Howyadoin', Reap the Chaos?  Having a good day?  Me, I'm glad that classes have started up again; I get twitchy after too long without teaching.  And I'm starting up with a Judo club this afternoon, so I'm excited about that.
 
2013-09-09 04:27:35 PM
People who buy art because of who painted it are like people who won't bang a hot chick because her name's wrong.
 
2013-09-09 04:34:04 PM

farkeruk: People who buy art because of who painted it are like people who won't bang a hot chick because her name's wrong.


I was thinking the same thing. For all these years it was a crappy old painting that nobody liked or cared about that got tossed in the attic. But once its discovered who painted it its suddenly "OMG, it's a lost Masterpiece!"
 
Displayed 5 of 5 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report