If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Reuters)   Another porn star diagnosed with HIV. Who could have seen this coming?   (reuters.com) divider line 206
    More: Misc, HIV, Mikey Weinstein, porn actors, Free Speech Coalition, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, board of supervisors  
•       •       •

26529 clicks; posted to Main » on 08 Sep 2013 at 3:04 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



206 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-09-08 12:11:48 PM

YoOjo: Why do people share with the world who their favorite porn actresses are?
I admit that humans continually confuse me but this is another level shiat, you are in effect saying "here is the person that doesn't know I exist yet I slavishly masturbate to images of them and obsessively collect said images whenever possible. Please be aware of my preferences and feel free to make comments about the hair color or weight of this person. If you like the same person as me I will be delighted, if you dislike them I will be angry, either way I will slink away to masturbate over them and then return here with one dripping hand to react to your opinions on my opinions."
I like farking almonds, I truly farking love the little nut-faced freaks and delight that they exist. But, I have no inclination to post pictures of almonds online hoping to get a reaction and I have no interest in how almonds make you feel.
Seriously all you random farking idiots out there in the world, quit obsessing over women that don't know or care about your existence, if you need to empty your bag get on with it but quit having imaginary (girl)friends.
Ugh, humans exist... I forget sometimes.


The mere fact that you are posting this drivel seems to answer your own question so please move along and leave us alone.
 
2013-09-08 12:11:57 PM
Can't think of another company let a lone a whole industry that would voluntarily shut down over something as silly as employe health.
 
2013-09-08 12:19:17 PM
Crotchrocket Slim: TheJoe03: Crotchrocket Slim: Redheads are discriminated against in a lot of places, so we "get" them. Plus redheads have a reputation for being tigers in bed.

Myself, I prefer brunettes and "raven" haired chicks. Hot redheads over blondes though, blondes are boring to me.

I'm not unattracted to blondes but I'll agree that blonde being considered the "default" sexy hair color is pretty damn played out. Might help that I live in an area with a lot of white people of Scandinavian and German descent, blondes are very unexotic to me.

Then again, all that matters is if they are attractive.

This is objective truth.


Well my absolute favorite is lighter brunettes(light to medium brown hair, not dark brown or black hair) but unfortunately like 90% of the natural light/medium brown headed girls bleach theirs blonde and like 9.9% of the remaining 10 dye theirs jet black or red.

I like redheads good but being a red headed guy means like 95% of natural red headed women won't even consider you. I guess they don't want their future kids to have double gingervitis or some such.

I like natural blondes, but I definitely prefer a natural anything or a bottle redhead over a farking bleach blonde. I especially don't care for brown eyed bleach blondes. If you have brown eyes and don't like being a brunette go ginger.
 
2013-09-08 12:20:15 PM

stuffy: Can't think of another company let a lone a whole industry that would voluntarily shut down over something as silly as employe health.


The state and county health departments have been trying to regulate LA-based production better for years. Anything the industry does that gives even the remotest appearance of less than stellar compliance could create a climate of profit-destroying legal issues and/or a legally enforced ban on production. The only people who are really getting farked over in this are the performers and the almost universally held attitude about them is that they're subhuman in the first place because of what they've chosen to do.
 
2013-09-08 12:23:16 PM

likefunbutnot: The_Philosopher_King: What I want to know is how the industry makes any money. Does anyone pay for porn anymore?



Where have we met on the interwebz. It has always fascinated me how the industry works.  And other then maybe goverment most of the innovations on the web have come from that industry.  Example streaming quality, video codecs and so on. Also what does it mean/say that we know this much about this.


/don't judge.
 
2013-09-08 12:25:09 PM

bigbobowski: Crotchrocket Slim: This gives me a sad as I enjoy porn and I think the industry is being run by complete shiatheads who could easily prevent a lot of this but are too farking cheap/scumbag capitalist to do so.

they do because "This gives me a sad as I enjoy porn" insist on bare back porn. this industry supplies like every other, what the consumer demands.


Not me personally, I honestly am fine with condoms worn in porn. I'm really surprised that didn't catch on.
 
2013-09-08 12:27:05 PM

The_Philosopher_King: What I want to know is how the industry makes any money. Does anyone pay for porn anymore?

It seems with Red Tube and other free sites that there isn't a market of people willing to pay.

Unless you can really live off the ad revenue.

However, never having paid for any I don't know if the "content" is superior.

Also, if anyone wants to list free sites other than Red Tube it might be a FARK community service.


pornstarsgalore  is probably the best place to go it breaks it down by each actress. the other site listed are just as good but not the same breakout.
 
2013-09-08 12:30:12 PM

Crotchrocket Slim: bigbobowski: Crotchrocket Slim: This gives me a sad as I enjoy porn and I think the industry is being run by complete shiatheads who could easily prevent a lot of this but are too farking cheap/scumbag capitalist to do so.

they do because "This gives me a sad as I enjoy porn" insist on bare back porn. this industry supplies like every other, what the consumer demands.

Not me personally, I honestly am fine with condoms worn in porn. I'm really surprised that didn't catch on.


I'm surprised that by now they can't just be used and digitally erased.  Couldn't all male actors have a very high-res 3D model made of their wangs in all states of hardness and angles relative to the abdomen, and then just green-screen that shiat on a green condom?  A lower-tech version could just involve using very clear condoms and air-brushing away the ring at the base, although that would require shooting around the parts where it comes on and off.
 
2013-09-08 12:35:58 PM
This is not a problem with Hentai
 
2013-09-08 12:38:40 PM

zerkalo: No Ms. Porno. I expect you to die and be a relatively unmourned passing


because having sex means that you deserve to die and be shunned by humanity.
 
2013-09-08 12:39:28 PM
You really don't need to list a whole bunch of streaming sites for porn. Just go to Bing.com, turn off the Safe Filter, then type in "Porn". It will pull up videos from every streaming site out there. And if you know a porn star's name, even better.

Google has pretty much neutered its porn search. For our protection.
 
2013-09-08 12:41:22 PM

filter: Not a fan of professional porn. It is as artificial and cliched as top-40 pop music... like drinking Budweiser. If high heels in bed and a soundtrack are involved, forget it.


I would like to see a porn with a good story.
 
2013-09-08 12:47:24 PM

Yankees Team Gynecologist: Crotchrocket Slim: bigbobowski: Crotchrocket Slim: This gives me a sad as I enjoy porn and I think the industry is being run by complete shiatheads who could easily prevent a lot of this but are too farking cheap/scumbag capitalist to do so.

they do because "This gives me a sad as I enjoy porn" insist on bare back porn. this industry supplies like every other, what the consumer demands.

Not me personally, I honestly am fine with condoms worn in porn. I'm really surprised that didn't catch on.

I'm surprised that by now they can't just be used and digitally erased.  Couldn't all male actors have a very high-res 3D model made of their wangs in all states of hardness and angles relative to the abdomen, and then just green-screen that shiat on a green condom?  A lower-tech version could just involve using very clear condoms and air-brushing away the ring at the base, although that would require shooting around the parts where it comes on and off.


Porn generally can't afford anything that adds additional expense. Profits are on razor thin margins and you'd be taking about adding a while extra layer of production middlemen. There might be some kind of compromise with a low visibility condom but frankly everyone just needs to suck it up (ha!) and realize that people who have sex in anything less than fluid-bonded monogamy probably need to use protection all the time. If that breaks your immersion, or you can't get off until you see a cream pie, you'll get over it out you'll find some other way to get your fix. Either way, nobody should have to risk their life to make sure you can have a boner.
 
2013-09-08 12:48:53 PM

Smackledorfer: filter: Not a fan of professional porn. It is as artificial and cliched as top-40 pop music... like drinking Budweiser. If high heels in bed and a soundtrack are involved, forget it.

I would like to see a porn with a good story.


if you check the vivid stuff they put together some really good stuff.

/Just looking for the smut myself.
 
2013-09-08 12:51:49 PM

Smackledorfer: filter: Not a fan of professional porn. It is as artificial and cliched as top-40 pop music... like drinking Budweiser. If high heels in bed and a soundtrack are involved, forget it.

I would like to see a porn with a good story.


It can exist but it's hard to find. By women for women stuff is usually a better bet (it's also usually softer or female only performances) but New Sensations has a romance line and a lot of times parody porn is more coherent than anything else coming from a studio.
 
2013-09-08 12:58:58 PM

likefunbutnot: Porn generally can't afford anything that adds additional expense. Profits are on razor thin margins and you'd be taking about adding a while extra layer of production middlemen. There might be some kind of compromise with a low visibility condom but frankly everyone just needs to suck it up (ha!) and realize that people who have sex in anything less than fluid-bonded monogamy probably need to use protection all the time. If that breaks your immersion, or you can't get off until you see a cream pie, you'll get over it out you'll find some other way to get your fix. Either way, nobody should have to risk their life to make sure you can have a boner.


Yeah, I agree, and I personally don't mind, but if the general populace shuns condoms then the mainstream industry might have to adopt said CGI, which would be a layup compared to what goes into a typical action movie nowadays.  Based on some of the "amateur" (or low-budget) stuff I've seen out there (not really a fan of though), evidently there are plenty of women  willing to do unprotected scenes with multiple strange partners.  They're probably hookers with drug problems being paid very little, and this shouldn't happen like you said, but it can and will if the demand is there.
 
2013-09-08 01:05:37 PM

styckx: Meanwhile.. On the internet

[img2.joyreactor.cc image 850x1263]


img11.imageshack.us

Best. Combo. Evar.
 
2013-09-08 01:05:57 PM

eas81: if you check the vivid stuff they put together some really good stuff.


ehhhh... I don't know if I'd go that far. Vivid swears up and down that most of its content is couples-friend but honestly a lot of it is well-packaged and star-driven but full of the same hateful tropes that a lot of people find so off-putting, like spitting and facials. Vivid productions are also extremely formulaic in terms of choreography.

Rather than a blanket recommendation for a studio, I'd say that the best thing to do is to start by finding a director whose work you like. One person may find that extremely well produced, stylized movies from Michael Ninn or Andrew Blake are more acceptable than highly formulaic Paul Thomas movies and someone else might like the sensibilities of Eon McKai or Candida Royalle.
 
2013-09-08 01:12:26 PM

Yankees Team Gynecologist: They're probably hookers with drug problems being paid very little, and this shouldn't happen like you said, but it can and will if the demand is there.


I wouldn't automatically assume the drug problem part is true, but these chicks very often have little kids and practically all of them have parasite boyfriends who think they're going to get rich from what their girlfriend does on her back. It is completely true though that there's a HUGE downward pricing pressure on porn performance and the only way to really make up for it is to do weirder and weirder things on camera to get a decent paycheck.
 
2013-09-08 01:56:24 PM

Smackledorfer: I would like to see a porn with a good story.


Don't really exist. At best, you have a plot that's fairly uncontrived, but porn is generally like musicals and kung fu movies.

Personally, I kinda like the 1978 film Candy Stripers, and its sequel is a ridiculous riot.
 
2013-09-08 02:19:12 PM

sift: MadAzza: Neeek: Wolf892: I bet less porn stars have contracted HIV than US soldiers have died overseas in the last 2 years...
Jobs have risks. Everyone knows what they are.
The day we decide to ban war because a soldier got killed is the day I agree to ban porn because someone got HIV.

Far less porn stars contract STDs than the population at large. You are seriously safer boinking a porn star than a random hookup in a bar.

No, you're not, but it's nice to see their PR is working.

no really. you have a far greater risk picking it up from the general population.


[themoreyouknow.jpg]
 
2013-09-08 02:28:02 PM

KierzanDax: likefunbutnot: <Informative and incredibly detailed post>

My gods, you're like Wikipornia. I bow to your knowledge.

Also, for sites, I'd add "NudeVista". It's a porn search engine. For instance, type in Fark's favorite porn type "midget" and it will display links for midget porn on numerous sites.


All you need is TBLOP - The Big List of Porn.
 
2013-09-08 02:34:47 PM

likefunbutnot: Smackledorfer: filter: Not a fan of professional porn. It is as artificial and cliched as top-40 pop music... like drinking Budweiser. If high heels in bed and a soundtrack are involved, forget it.

I would like to see a porn with a good story.

It can exist but it's hard to find. By women for women stuff is usually a better bet (it's also usually softer or female only performances) but New Sensations has a romance line and a lot of times parody porn is more coherent than anything else coming from a studio.


The Star Wars porn parody is actually funny: "Mos Eisley spaceport: You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. Believe me, I tried."
 
2013-09-08 02:36:55 PM

mr0x: The source of the HIV turned out to be a male pr0nstar who got HIV from non-pr0n sex in Brazil.


"Porn." Just type it, "porn."

"Pr0n" has never fooled any filter, anywhere.
 
2013-09-08 02:46:29 PM

cardex: AngryDragon: cardex: gmpilot: Interestingly, HIV transmission rates in the US are now highest in poor black women.  The gay community has put a lot of effort into testing and protection.

But they still let poor black women give blood and donate organs

Although the policy of barring homosexuals from giving blood, etc. should be reviewed, there really was a good reason for it at one point.  It wasn't just a discriminatory policy.

Lots of things were good ideas at the time like radio active tonic water and bayer heroin for teething toddlers but they turn out to be wrong after we learn more. The ban should have been lifted 15 years ago now it is just discriminatory because its easier to leave in place then deal with the right wing backlash


Nope.
 
2013-09-08 02:52:34 PM

Disgruntled Goat: mr0x: The source of the HIV turned out to be a male pr0nstar who got HIV from non-pr0n sex in Brazil.

"Porn." Just type it, "porn."

"Pr0n" has never fooled any filter, anywhere.


While we're at it, 4chan-influenced Fark posters: "Source" is just as easy to type as "sauce", and you cease looking like a tool when you use big boy words.
 
2013-09-08 03:12:56 PM
Pr0n does not necessarily mean porn.  Perhaps mr0x was using l33tspeak for prawn.  I mean, who would not be turned on by some hot crustacean-on-crustacean action?
 
2013-09-08 03:17:18 PM
huh?
 
2013-09-08 03:34:11 PM
elvisaintdead:
aria giovanni

Painfully amazing ass, but hardly "porn".  She did do a darkly funny vid with Nathan Fillion.
 
2013-09-08 03:44:03 PM

gmpilot: Interestingly, HIV transmission rates in the US are now highest in poor black women.  The gay community has put a lot of effort into testing and protection.


That isn't true, and never has been.

Black women have the highest transmission rates for hetereosexual women.  White and black male homosexuals still get infected at almost double the rate of anyone else.
 
2013-09-08 03:56:25 PM

likefunbutnot: Yankees Team Gynecologist: Crotchrocket Slim: bigbobowski: Crotchrocket Slim: This gives me a sad as I enjoy porn and I think the industry is being run by complete shiatheads who could easily prevent a lot of this but are too farking cheap/scumbag capitalist to do so.

they do because "This gives me a sad as I enjoy porn" insist on bare back porn. this industry supplies like every other, what the consumer demands.

Not me personally, I honestly am fine with condoms worn in porn. I'm really surprised that didn't catch on.

I'm surprised that by now they can't just be used and digitally erased.  Couldn't all male actors have a very high-res 3D model made of their wangs in all states of hardness and angles relative to the abdomen, and then just green-screen that shiat on a green condom?  A lower-tech version could just involve using very clear condoms and air-brushing away the ring at the base, although that would require shooting around the parts where it comes on and off.

Porn generally can't afford anything that adds additional expense. Profits are on razor thin margins and you'd be taking about adding a while extra layer of production middlemen. There might be some kind of compromise with a low visibility condom but frankly everyone just needs to suck it up (ha!) and realize that people who have sex in anything less than fluid-bonded monogamy probably need to use protection all the time. If that breaks your immersion, or you can't get off until you see a cream pie, you'll get over it out you'll find some other way to get your fix. Either way, nobody should have to risk their life to make sure you can have a boner.


Virtually all jobs exist to meet some non-essential consumer demand.  And virtually all jobs have health risks.

Everyone risks their life *every day*.

Is porn more dangerous than being a bouncer?  Or a flight attended?  Or an office worker?

Honestly, I don't know.  I suspect that it isn't.  I've seen a lot of 'Top 10 most dangerous jobs' lists over the years and porn is never even mentioned.  Fisherman, farmers, construction workers, electrical guys, roofers, loggers, etc, etc....why is it okay that someone risk their life so I can have my favorite fish, but not so I can wank in the way God intended?
 
2013-09-08 04:00:31 PM

AngryDragon: Crotchrocket Slim: You forget the crux of my post. If it's cool to ban entire demographics from donating, why is no one suggesting the same of black women now that the stats support this?

Because we can find it now. and they test everything.  It's no longer necessary to use a broadsword as we now have a scalpel.


BECAUSE IT ISN'T TRUE.

Black women have the highest heterosexual infection rates.  Gay males still have double the infection rates of anyone else despite being an even smaller portion of the population than black women.

Personally, I think we should be testing all donated blood so it shouldn't matter, but if you're running the numbers the highest risk for HIV infection is still homosexual males by a long shot.
 
2013-09-08 04:02:43 PM

Fark_Guy_Rob: likefunbutnot: Yankees Team Gynecologist: Crotchrocket Slim: bigbobowski: Crotchrocket Slim: This gives me a sad as I enjoy porn and I think the industry is being run by complete shiatheads who could easily prevent a lot of this but are too farking cheap/scumbag capitalist to do so.

they do because "This gives me a sad as I enjoy porn" insist on bare back porn. this industry supplies like every other, what the consumer demands.

Not me personally, I honestly am fine with condoms worn in porn. I'm really surprised that didn't catch on.

I'm surprised that by now they can't just be used and digitally erased.  Couldn't all male actors have a very high-res 3D model made of their wangs in all states of hardness and angles relative to the abdomen, and then just green-screen that shiat on a green condom?  A lower-tech version could just involve using very clear condoms and air-brushing away the ring at the base, although that would require shooting around the parts where it comes on and off.

Porn generally can't afford anything that adds additional expense. Profits are on razor thin margins and you'd be taking about adding a while extra layer of production middlemen. There might be some kind of compromise with a low visibility condom but frankly everyone just needs to suck it up (ha!) and realize that people who have sex in anything less than fluid-bonded monogamy probably need to use protection all the time. If that breaks your immersion, or you can't get off until you see a cream pie, you'll get over it out you'll find some other way to get your fix. Either way, nobody should have to risk their life to make sure you can have a boner.

Virtually all jobs exist to meet some non-essential consumer demand.  And virtually all jobs have health risks.

Everyone risks their life *every day*.

Is porn more dangerous than being a bouncer?  Or a flight attended?  Or an office worker?

Honestly, I don't know.  I suspect that it isn't.  I've seen a lot of 'Top 10 most dangerous jobs' lists over the years and porn is never even mentioned.  Fisherman, farmers, construction workers, electrical guys, roofers, loggers, etc, etc....why is it okay that someone risk their life so I can have my favorite fish, but not so I can wank in the way God intended?


Also like everything (once its final product and not raw material) is shipped by truck, how many people die on the highways each year?
 
2013-09-08 04:08:31 PM

Lsherm: AngryDragon: Crotchrocket Slim: You forget the crux of my post. If it's cool to ban entire demographics from donating, why is no one suggesting the same of black women now that the stats support this?

Because we can find it now. and they test everything.  It's no longer necessary to use a broadsword as we now have a scalpel.

BECAUSE IT ISN'T TRUE.

Black women have the highest heterosexual infection rates.  Gay males still have double the infection rates of anyone else despite being an even smaller portion of the population than black women.

Personally, I think we should be testing all donated blood so it shouldn't matter, but if you're running the numbers the highest risk for HIV infection is still homosexual males by a long shot.


They DO test everyone, there is an up to 6 month incubation period where you can be pos but test neg, which is the whole reason they have thier questions and disqualifiers and dont rely JUST on testing.

The up to 6 month incubation period is also why they only test each donor twice a year even though you can donate more often.
 
2013-09-08 04:17:30 PM

Crotchrocket Slim: movieman_1979: Audrey Hollander, fah-reak!

Audrey's occasionally almost a little too nasty for me, but I love that smutty chick ;)


Check out her stuff on kink.com
 
2013-09-08 04:38:44 PM

likefunbutnot: Kink.com is a woman-owned D/s, Bondage and fetish site.


What, did  Peter Acworth get a sex change?
 
2013-09-08 04:41:57 PM

HotWingAgenda: Vertdang: pedobearapproved: walrusonion: doglover: walrusonion: styckx: Meanwhile.. On the internet

[img2.joyreactor.cc image 850x1263]

Faye Reagan has vag warts and a drug problem.

And yet even she won't stoop to your level.

Enjoy that.

It's all good, i'm not into crotch warts and track marks. Faye only ever farks that one dude anyway.

I sing karaoke with that dude. They don't fark no more

I... whuh... wait.... what?

Well, of course. Doesn't everyone do karaoke with porn stars? I'm in a fantasy football league with Peter North and Ron Jeremy.


http://www.vice.com/read/porn-star-karaoke-is-a-thing-and-its-awesom e

Well you could. (of course the above is not where he sings karaoke with me, but he's the one that told me about it)
 
2013-09-08 04:43:02 PM

Neeek: Far less porn stars contract STDs than the population at large. You are seriously safer boinking a porn star than a random hookup in a bar.


true for midlevel & up escorts as well

way safer
 
2013-09-08 05:28:45 PM

gmpilot: Interestingly, HIV transmission rates in the US are now highest in poor black women.  The gay community has put a lot of effort into testing and protection.


Got a citation for that?  Because M2M still has the highest rate per the CDC.
 
2013-09-08 05:36:34 PM

The_Philosopher_King: Of course the anti-smut people chimed in:

"Our thrust is to prick holes in the stiff front erected by the smut dealers. We must keep mounting an offensive to penetrate any crack in his defenses, so we can lay to rest his dominant position. We want him hung and we want fast action. So lets get on em, lets run through a stiff bail law, so it will be hard for him to get it up. We've got to come together, so we can whip this thing into submission. It will be hard on us but we cant lick it by being soft!"


Thank you for referencing George Carlin, a master wordsmith and one of the world's great thinkers.
 
2013-09-08 05:47:27 PM

TheJoe03: Why do nerds like redheads so much?


Why do jocks like blondes so much?
 
2013-09-08 06:04:01 PM

cardex: AngryDragon: cardex: gmpilot: Interestingly, HIV transmission rates in the US are now highest in poor black women.  The gay community has put a lot of effort into testing and protection.

But they still let poor black women give blood and donate organs

Although the policy of barring homosexuals from giving blood, etc. should be reviewed, there really was a good reason for it at one point.  It wasn't just a discriminatory policy.

Lots of things were good ideas at the time like radio active tonic water and bayer heroin for teething toddlers but they turn out to be wrong after we learn more. The ban should have been lifted 15 years ago now it is just discriminatory because its easier to leave in place then deal with the right wing backlash


According to the CDC, roughly 20% of gay men in the US are HIV positive but half of them don't know it.  Assuming the 10% who are HIV positive and know it simply don't bother to donate that means that 1 in 9 potential gay male donors (11%) would be HIV positive.

Even if the detection of HIV in donated blood is 99% that means there will be a farkton of infected blood in the pool and the transmission rate for a transfusion is near 100%.

Gay men should be allowed to donate but only if they've been celibate for at least a year and have already had a negative HIV test.
 
2013-09-08 06:08:51 PM

Oldiron_79: Lsherm: AngryDragon: Crotchrocket Slim: You forget the crux of my post. If it's cool to ban entire demographics from donating, why is no one suggesting the same of black women now that the stats support this?

Because we can find it now. and they test everything.  It's no longer necessary to use a broadsword as we now have a scalpel.

BECAUSE IT ISN'T TRUE.

Black women have the highest heterosexual infection rates.  Gay males still have double the infection rates of anyone else despite being an even smaller portion of the population than black women.

Personally, I think we should be testing all donated blood so it shouldn't matter, but if you're running the numbers the highest risk for HIV infection is still homosexual males by a long shot.

They DO test everyone, there is an up to 6 month incubation period where you can be pos but test neg, which is the whole reason they have thier questions and disqualifiers and dont rely JUST on testing.

The up to 6 month incubation period is also why they only test each donor twice a year even though you can donate more often.


Not quite true. Each blood donation is tested each and every time. The donor may not be aware if it, but all blood products are tested every. Single. Time.
 
2013-09-08 07:07:16 PM

Khellendros: TheJoe03: Why do nerds like redheads so much?

Why do jocks like blondes so much?


Not really sure, maybe because blondes were long seen as the pinnacle of beauty and jocks just wanted the best trophy? Not sure that blondes hold that status anymore, so who knows.
 
2013-09-08 07:22:41 PM
It is strange -- yellow hair and red lipstick would normally serve as warning signs about venom.  But fire engine red lipstick on a blonde makes 'em queue around the block.  And yet they're usually no less deadly.  To your wallet.


content.artofmanliness.com
 
2013-09-08 07:25:36 PM

Disgruntled Goat: mr0x: The source of the HIV turned out to be a male pr0nstar who got HIV from non-pr0n sex in Brazil.

"Porn." Just type it, "porn."

"Pr0n" has never fooled any filter, anywhere.


But if he spells it "pron" and not "pr0n" then no one will know how kewl he is.
 
2013-09-08 07:44:12 PM

Smackledorfer: filter: Not a fan of professional porn. It is as artificial and cliched as top-40 pop music... like drinking Budweiser. If high heels in bed and a soundtrack are involved, forget it.

I would like to see a porn with a good story.


A lot of the parody stuff is really hilarious. You can easily find SFW trailers of them to judge for yourself...
 
2013-09-08 08:17:21 PM

George_Spelvin: Was it SUPER-AIDS?
[www.brendanmckillip.com image 450x321]


LOLWut?
 
2013-09-08 09:27:15 PM
probably going to make condoms mandatory for filming. I mean OSHA enforces protective gear for other industries, I don't see why they couldn't for porn industry
 
2013-09-08 11:00:40 PM

likefunbutnot: Yankees Team Gynecologist: They're probably hookers with drug problems being paid very little, and this shouldn't happen like you said, but it can and will if the demand is there.

I wouldn't automatically assume the drug problem part is true, but these chicks very often have little kids and practically all of them have parasite boyfriends who think they're going to get rich from what their girlfriend does on her back. It is completely true though that there's a HUGE downward pricing pressure on porn performance and the only way to really make up for it is to do weirder and weirder things on camera to get a decent paycheck.


You sound like someone I know....
 
Displayed 50 of 206 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report