GoldSpider: Wooly Bully: Other people already answered you,They haven't either. All they've said is that a body armed with nothing more than good intentions says chemical weapons are bad.Wooly Bully: The rest of us are just laughing in disbelief.Indeed, it's laughable to suggest we ought not kick yet another middle eastern hornets' nest. "If you're not with us, you're against us", right?
Astralwand: Take that and the fact that it's a lot harder to control chemical weapons and biological weapons it's pretty clear why we would rather be bombed and shot.
PainfulItching: Not only that, but in this situation, Assad is threatening his neighbors for no good reason.
GoldSpider: When did we decide that indiscriminately killing civilians with gas was worse than doing so with bombs and bullets?
dletter: The bigger thing is, can someone determine what site that is.... is it just some "play for fun" site, or an illegal offshore site for real money?If it is the latter, the theppa.org will have a field day with it.
Can't get enough Fark in your life? Try
More threads. More community. More Farking.
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2018 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Feb 22 2018 00:55:08
Runtime: 0.350 sec (349 ms)