Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Daily Mail)   EU may require cars to read road signs and prevent drivers from exceeding speed limits. Suddenly spray painting a 3 into an 8 seems a lot more clever   (dailymail.co.uk ) divider line
    More: PSA, Britain, traffic fatalities, road sign, camera system, eu countries, speed limiter, speed limits, ISA  
•       •       •

3890 clicks; posted to Main » on 01 Sep 2013 at 12:56 PM (2 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



100 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2013-09-01 01:58:55 PM  
Cops can still ticket for signs that are in the bushes/rusted to oblivion.

Sure, you can fight them, but it'll cost you.
 
2013-09-01 02:04:01 PM  

sheep snorter: Ah Europe. Lets put a GPS unit in every vehicle(in transport trucks now) to charge a road toll via where you drive. But comes with some basic privacy laws to prevent scraping all that data.


Yes. Those who make & enforce the laws will always follow them, citizen. European governments would never spy on their own people.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
 
2013-09-01 02:05:51 PM  
This would be okay if the speed limits were actually set by some scientific method, not because of whining NIMBYs and police departments looking for easy tickets. The limit on an identical stretch of road in this city can be anywhere from 40 to 80 k.p.h. So people routinely ignore the signs. Even grannies are 10 over the limit. If you bumped it up to what 90% of us are driving anyway, that would be a sane limit.
 
2013-09-01 02:07:20 PM  

legion_of_doo: sheep snorter: Ah Europe. Lets put a GPS unit in every vehicle(in transport trucks now) to charge a road toll via where you drive. But comes with some basic privacy laws to prevent scraping all that data.

Yes. Those who make & enforce the laws will always follow them, citizen. European governments would never spy on their own people.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?


ille qui eam fecit illud olfecit
 
2013-09-01 02:09:22 PM  
The fact that we even have the ability to implement such a scheme only highlights the absurdity of speed limit enforcement in the first place.
 
2013-09-01 02:16:35 PM  

Recoil Therapy: worlddan: came for the Rush reference...leaving disappointed.

/feeling old

Try again....

/feels old as well


Speak for yourself. Some of us are young, wondering what our dreams might be worth, but too cheap to go wandering the face of the earth.
 
2013-09-01 02:22:18 PM  

bigsteve3OOO: mister aj: I think it's terrible that the government is infringing upon my right to break the law. Truly this is fascism in its most advanced stages.

Never had to get your wife to the hospital quick to have a baby have you?


Not that I disagree with the sentiment, but I truly hope you have an EMS crew that you would call, in place of having your wife/SO have the kid on the floorboards of your car.

I would imagine if it were a true emergency, emergency vehicles would be somewhat exempt....
 
2013-09-01 02:25:19 PM  

bingethinker: This would be okay if the speed limits were actually set by some scientific method, not because of whining NIMBYs and police departments looking for easy tickets. The limit on an identical stretch of road in this city can be anywhere from 40 to 80 k.p.h. So people routinely ignore the signs. Even grannies are 10 over the limit. If you bumped it up to what 90% of us are driving anyway, that would be a sane limit.


The only part of Europe I've done much driving in is southern France, and I found the speed limits there to be pretty reasonable.  The highways were mostly 120kph, unless there was construction, and some of the country and mountain roads near where I lived honestly felt pretty scary at the posted limit.

That being said...  priorité à droite... what the fark are you French people thinking!?
 
2013-09-01 02:26:41 PM  

lack of warmth: Weng: Seems to me this would be easily defeated by a piece of tape that prevents it from seeing any speed limit signs.

Unless the camera includes a basic photo cell that automatically locks breaks until it detects some light.


Petroleum jelly over the lens. It'll detect light but it won't be reading anything.
 
2013-09-01 02:28:18 PM  

Recoil Therapy: So the police in small towns would have to figure out a new way to shake down out of towners than a speed trap where it instantly drops from 55 to 35?  I wonder just how the police are going to spin this once they realize that they can no longer write speeding tickets if this goes through?


A cop can write you a speeding ticket even if you're not actually speeding.  Driving with out-of-state plates is usually sufficient, since the cop knows it will cost you more to come back and contest it than just paying it.
 
2013-09-01 02:38:21 PM  

Recoil Therapy: So the police in small towns would have to figure out a new way to shake down out of towners than a speed trap where it instantly drops from 55 to 35?  I wonder just how the police are going to spin this once they realize that they can no longer write speeding tickets if this goes through?

/ironically enough I was listening to Moving Pictures this morning & Red Barchetta was playing when I read this
//it would be kind of funny watching a place where the speed did drop 20mph instantly & watching all the cars slam on their brakes.  Can you sue the .gov for whiplash?


Maybe you could, you know, pay attention while you're driving? I mean, if you can't see speed limit signs and react to them (they aren't even moving), you probably can't react to other road hazards fast enough, and you shouldn't be allowed to drive.
 
2013-09-01 02:46:42 PM  

FloydA: A cop can write you a X-ing ticket even if you're not actually X-ing.


Basically.  "Have fun wasting your time beating this in court, citizen.  And you'd better hope it doesn't come down to your word against mine."
 
2013-09-01 02:59:16 PM  

GORDON: mister aj: I think it's terrible that the government is infringing upon my right to break the law. Truly this is fascism in its most advanced stages.

Boot licker spotted.


I see statists everywhere. They don't even know they're statists...
 
2013-09-01 03:02:03 PM  
Instead of making smarter cars, why don't we make smarter drivers?

/Train the hell out of new drivers
//Bob Bondurant FTW!!!
 
2013-09-01 03:06:10 PM  

RexTalionis: This will never take off in the US. Why? Because police departments around the country depend too much on the revenue from people who speed.


As opposed to other countries where the cop just stuffs bribe money in his flashlight
 
2013-09-01 03:07:57 PM  

studs up: GORDON: mister aj: I think it's terrible that the government is infringing upon my right to break the law. Truly this is fascism in its most advanced stages.

Boot licker spotted.

I see statists everywhere. They don't even know they're statists...


They always proud of being sensible.
 
2013-09-01 03:10:58 PM  

Mr. Eugenides: My GPS already reminds me when I'm more than 12 over the limit.  It's pretty nice except when the GPS has the wrong info for road speed.  What would be really nice is if the GPS would warn me ahead of time when the limit goes from 55 to 35 just outside some little rural town because they get pissed off when I cruise through at 64 mph.


I got a ticket that very way. It was hard to say " blame the GPS as I was pulled over at the sign where it went back to 60.
 
2013-09-01 03:25:18 PM  

doglover: Ideas this bad? You deserve the consequences if you go through with it. Gimp all the cars and watch nobody drive a legal car ever again.


I note Ford vehicles already have speed governors in them. I rented a late model Focus a while back. The car was limited to 80MPH. If you approached it the car would warn you and then if you hit it it would refuse to go faster.

I can tell you if I were to purchase a vehicle the first thing I'd do is reverse engineer that CAN bus and make the computer think the car was only going 5MPH when you're doing a buck.
 
2013-09-01 03:29:38 PM  

rmdpgh: bigsteve3OOO: mister aj: I think it's terrible that the government is infringing upon my right to break the law. Truly this is fascism in its most advanced stages.

Never had to get your wife to the hospital quick to have a baby have you?

Not that I disagree with the sentiment, but I truly hope you have an EMS crew that you would call, in place of having your wife/SO have the kid on the floorboards of your car.

I would imagine if it were a true emergency, emergency vehicles would be somewhat exempt....


I was born on the floor of my fathers brand new 69 gran torino.  only new car he ever owned.  he still reminds me every time he sees me 44 years later.
 
2013-09-01 03:32:32 PM  

bigsteve3OOO: rmdpgh: bigsteve3OOO: mister aj: I think it's terrible that the government is infringing upon my right to break the law. Truly this is fascism in its most advanced stages.

Never had to get your wife to the hospital quick to have a baby have you?

Not that I disagree with the sentiment, but I truly hope you have an EMS crew that you would call, in place of having your wife/SO have the kid on the floorboards of your car.

I would imagine if it were a true emergency, emergency vehicles would be somewhat exempt....

I was born on the floor of my fathers brand new 69 gran torino.  only new car he ever owned.  he still reminds me every time he sees me 44 years later.


were there many jokes about being born same place you were conceived?

/obvious
 
2013-09-01 03:39:14 PM  

Dinki: Once they perfect self driving cars this will be pretty standard.


Once the cars are driving themselves, there won't be any speed limits. The cars will adjust their speed to road and traffic conditions. The speed on superhighways will be quite a lot faster than today.
 
2013-09-01 03:39:46 PM  
This is apparently a draft of a proposal and it will get shot down once presented.
 
2013-09-01 04:06:16 PM  
Why is this not a good thing.

Think about the wonderful chaos that could be caused by a set of radio hackers around financial and government centers.  It couldn't last too long.

\My point is throwing around technology without understanding the downsides is not always a good thing and it would be very easy to prove.

Luddites exist for a reason, and some may actually understand technology.
 
2013-09-01 04:14:57 PM  

lack of warmth: Weng: Seems to me this would be easily defeated by a piece of tape that prevents it from seeing any speed limit signs.

Unless the camera includes a basic photo cell that automatically locks breaks until it detects some light.


Tape and an led!
 
2013-09-01 04:40:08 PM  

MarkEC: Dinki: Once they perfect self driving cars this will be pretty standard.

Once the cars are driving themselves, there won't be any speed limits. The cars will adjust their speed to road and traffic conditions. The speed on superhighways will be quite a lot faster than today.


For added traction, put the cars on a rail system so as to prevent losing control or bad lane changes.  Then to save energy, make the cars bigger to haul larger groups of people even though it means the cars won't be able to take you close to your destination leaving you to walk part of it and giving you better health.  We could call this new invention trollies, trains or cable cars.  All snark aside, I really don't have a problem with the idea of our country traveling by rail more, but for some reason Americans feel very distrustful of train operators.  Mmm, there must be some reason why we feel the need to control our own travel.
 
2013-09-01 05:24:22 PM  

lack of warmth: MarkEC: Dinki: Once they perfect self driving cars this will be pretty standard.

Once the cars are driving themselves, there won't be any speed limits. The cars will adjust their speed to road and traffic conditions. The speed on superhighways will be quite a lot faster than today.

For added traction, put the cars on a rail system so as to prevent losing control or bad lane changes.  Then to save energy, make the cars bigger to haul larger groups of people even though it means the cars won't be able to take you close to your destination leaving you to walk part of it and giving you better health.  We could call this new invention trollies, trains or cable cars.  All snark aside, I really don't have a problem with the idea of our country traveling by rail more, but for some reason Americans feel very distrustful of train operators.  Mmm, there must be some reason why we feel the need to control our own travel.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=g5NyBO75YYc
 
2013-09-01 05:28:50 PM  

lack of warmth: make the cars bigger to haul larger groups of people even though it means the cars won't be able to take you close to your destination leaving you to walk part of it and giving you better health.


DIAF.
 
2013-09-01 05:30:30 PM  

Road Rash: lack of warmth: MarkEC: Dinki: Once they perfect self driving cars this will be pretty standard.

Once the cars are driving themselves, there won't be any speed limits. The cars will adjust their speed to road and traffic conditions. The speed on superhighways will be quite a lot faster than today.

For added traction, put the cars on a rail system so as to prevent losing control or bad lane changes.  Then to save energy, make the cars bigger to haul larger groups of people even though it means the cars won't be able to take you close to your destination leaving you to walk part of it and giving you better health.  We could call this new invention trollies, trains or cable cars.  All snark aside, I really don't have a problem with the idea of our country traveling by rail more, but for some reason Americans feel very distrustful of train operators.  Mmm, there must be some reason why we feel the need to control our own travel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=g5NyBO75YYc


Maybe they should install those things on trains first.
 
2013-09-01 05:36:56 PM  

Enemabag Jones: Why is this not a good thing.

Think about the wonderful chaos that could be caused by a set of radio hackers around financial and government centers.  It couldn't last too long.

\My point is throwing around technology without understanding the downsides is not always a good thing and it would be very easy to prove.

Luddites exist for a reason, and some may actually understand technology.


I wouldn't be surprised if they tried using transponder systems similar to airplanes - makes it easier to track you as well.

Why would this not be good? Consider the part of the article where they mention braking control, for starters ...

hackers - having fun/profit at your expense
exotic/sports car market - gone!
if you're running late - you're late!
uncontrolled braking in extreme weather conditions
fines/revoking driving privileges if you attempt to disable the system

the government - by design or on a whim:
tracking you - and don't think they won't design this into the system!
shutting down all vehicles in a given area, under "emergency" circumstances
forcing everyone to drive slower to conserve fuel
charging you by the mile
... of course, they will get the privilege of driving as fast as they want ...
 
2013-09-01 05:51:02 PM  
Let's see: You live in a rural area and you slice a body part and start bleeding badly. Well, I guess you're screwed when someone who is trying to help you has to drive 30 miles to the nearest hospital and their car automatically makes you drive 45 mph, despite the fact you're losing blood fast!

/ Lives in Virginia: It's 30 miles to the nearest hospital and the back roads state you can "only" drive 45 mph.
// Rescue squads are volunteer, so it would take 20 minutes just to get help to me.
/// And I'm not even deep in the boondocks.
 
2013-09-01 05:54:35 PM  

Shostie: Flint Ironstag: Marcus Aurelius: Dinki: Once they perfect self driving cars this will be pretty standard.

We don't even have self-driving trains yet, so I wouldn't hold my breath.

Last time I was on a train in Vancouver I sat right at the front, and I sure as hell wasn't driving...

[i3.kym-cdn.com image 676x480]


Vancouver's fully automated trains. You can literally sit right at the front. There is just a huge windscreen like a bus, with the passenger seating right up to it.
 
2013-09-01 05:55:05 PM  
Road Rash
hackers - having fun/profit at your expense
exotic/sports car market - gone!
if you're running late - you're late!
uncontrolled braking in extreme weather conditions
fines/revoking driving privileges if you attempt to disable the system
the government - by design or on a whim:
tracking you - and don't think they won't design this into the system!
shutting down all vehicles in a given area, under "emergency" circumstances
forcing everyone to drive slower to conserve fuel
charging you by the mile
... of course, they will get the privilege of driving as fast as they want ...


I think we are on the same side. My point is that as soon as government tries to get everyone to go exactly the limit through GPS signals, or other wireless options, some wireless hacker will find a way to make the speed limit 5mph in the government and financial centers in the UK. People will revolt and it will fail.

Just as soon as government tries to consolidate power through stupid means like above, the more they fail. Something like sand being tightly gripped in the fist.

The only exceptions to the above I can think of are:
People ironically pay for onstar for their safety because of commercials where they are in a ditch beside the highway at 3am. For the children.
Japanese actually have GPS controlled sports cars that can go full throttle if they know they are on racetracks.
 
2013-09-01 06:34:22 PM  

freak7: I saw this coming 20 years ago and think it's a great idea.  Can't wait for it to be used in the USA.


Please tell me you are joking.  There have been a few instances where driving faster would be the only way to get out of a bad situation.  For example, if you are next to a truck that is trying to change lanes into you and the guy behind you isn't slowing down at all (either there is no lane next to you or there is a car there as well).  Speeding up may be the only way to avoid an accident.

Or if you are going through an intersection and not speeding up results in someone clipping your rear.

Or if someone is coming up way too fast and can't brake fast enough to avoid rear ending you.

And these are just a few I can think of off the top of my head.  I can imagine that other situations might come up (I noticed one comment speaking of living in a rural area, living far from a hospital, and having the potential need to get there fast).

But you keep thinking that restricting a car's speed is a good idea.  Nothing bad could ever come of it.
 
2013-09-01 06:44:09 PM  
06Wahoo
freak7: I saw this coming 20 years ago and think it's a great idea. Can't wait for it to be used in the USA.
Please tell me you are joking. There have been a few instances where driving faster would be the only way to get out of a bad situation. For example, if you are next to a truck that is trying to change lanes into you and the guy behind you isn't slowing down at all (either there is no lane next to you or there is a car there as well). Speeding up may be the only way to avoid an accident.
Or if you are going through an intersection and not speeding up results in someone clipping your rear.
Or if someone is coming up way too fast and can't brake fast enough to avoid rear ending you.
And these are just a few I can think of off the top of my head. I can imagine that other situations might come up (I noticed one comment speaking of living in a rural area, living far from a hospital, and having the potential need to get there fast).
But you keep thinking that restricting a car's speed is a good idea. Nothing bad could ever come of it.


Maybe, maybe, when it gets to the point that cars drive themselves people will accept the trade-off, I will let the car drive me and I surf the net while it takes me there.

Until then even the less superior driver of automatics will refuse it have have car limited to one mile over the speed limit. Stick drivers will go into a full set of convulsions.

You think American love guns, take away their freedom to speed when necessary, they will freak the hell out.
 
2013-09-01 06:53:01 PM  

bingethinker: This would be okay if the speed limits were actually set by some scientific method, not because of whining NIMBYs and police departments looking for easy tickets. The limit on an identical stretch of road in this city can be anywhere from 40 to 80 k.p.h. So people routinely ignore the signs. Even grannies are 10 over the limit. If you bumped it up to what 90% of us are driving anyway, that would be a sane limit.


I've heard (probably just bullshiat, though) that they do set it to what a percentage of the people drive in conjunction wish standard safety precautions.  The problem is on the day they do the measuring they call out the grannie patrol to drive in circles in the area.

/where's my tinfoil hat?
 
2013-09-01 07:07:41 PM  

06Wahoo: freak7: I saw this coming 20 years ago and think it's a great idea.  Can't wait for it to be used in the USA.

Please tell me you are joking.  There have been a few instances where driving faster would be the only way to get out of a bad situation.  For example, if you are next to a truck that is trying to change lanes into you and the guy behind you isn't slowing down at all (either there is no lane next to you or there is a car there as well).  Speeding up may be the only way to avoid an accident.


Also, fires, tornadoes, floods, other disasters you might need to flee from. Emergency vehicle needs to get through. Animals, pedestrians, bicyclists on the road. Broken down cars. Debris. Merging and turning traffic. All those dinky side roads that ain't registered in a GPS unit. Backroads without maintenance and with potholes or ruts. I think decent drivers can do much better than any self-driving car currently made at avoiding all those random hazards.
 
ZAZ [TotalFark]
2013-09-01 07:41:16 PM  
OgreMagi

In January, 2006 an article in a Massachusetts newspaper included the sentence

"Lincoln has little old ladies drive the road in question to lower the limit."

In Massachusetts the state checks the town's engineering, but sets a speed trap level limit anyway.

In California I hear they will increase enforcement before the speed study.
 
2013-09-01 07:52:44 PM  
Victoria Australia has the highest speed limit compliance in the world.  Take a look at its stats and see how increasing that has saved lives and reduced accidents.

/hint - it doesn't.
//other hint - congestion related accidents like tailgating are way up
///accidents involving people falling asleep at the wheel are now considered "medical causes" and are no longer included in the states totals.
 
2013-09-01 08:44:43 PM  
I would have no problem with this if I'd ever seen any evidence that speed limits were set in accordance with the average car's capabilities on the roads in question.

/ or if it were even remotely reasonable given the wide array of vehicles on the road
 
2013-09-01 09:09:07 PM  

RexTalionis: This will never take off in the US. Why? Because police departments around the country depend too much on the revenue from people who speed.


Oregon already did a pilot test program for GPS equipped license plates.  It was done under the guise of a use tax issue, but that won't stick for very long once they realize they can extend it to including speeding enforcement as well.

The difference being, they still get their money with this system.
 
2013-09-01 10:24:44 PM  

06Wahoo: Please tell me you are joking.  There have been a few instances where driving faster would be the only way to get out of a bad situation.  For example, if you are next to a truck that is trying to change lanes into you and the guy behind you isn't slowing down at all (either there is no lane next to you or there is a car there as well).  Speeding up may be the only way to avoid an accident.


If everybody is doing the speed limit, there's almost no chance of needing to go faster to avoid something that couldn't also be avoided by slowing.  Being able to keep vehicles from speeding in residential areas is a lot more important than the one in a million chance that you would have a legitimate reason for breaking the speed limit.
 
2013-09-02 01:59:34 AM  
How will GPS devices work when they are covered with metal foil and can't see the sky?  An old analog TV will have a tuner that will lock into Ch 37 which is happens be half the frequency needed to do the job for an easy to make device.  Of course that device will also light up many of the world's radio telescopes who might be able to pin point it down to a fraction of an inch but it would work until someone got there and stopped it.
 
2013-09-02 02:44:32 AM  

RexTalionis: This will never take off in the US. Why? Because police departments around the country depend too much on the revenue from people who speed.


Yep- Its never been about safety in the US.  I moved to Norway where a normal speeding ticket is about $800 (equivalent).  There isn't much speeding, and not much need for enforcement.... and not much revenue.  Same approach to DUI.  These are not revenue generators with tolerable fines.

There has been some talk of using black boxes in vehicles, and giving insurance companies access to the data in exchange for lower rates.  The idea is they can audit that data to see how safe a driver we all are--- and it would be voluntary- run by the private sector.
 
2013-09-02 03:42:40 AM  

DON.MAC: How will GPS devices work when they are covered with metal foil and can't see the sky?  An old analog TV will have a tuner that will lock into Ch 37 which is happens be half the frequency needed to do the job for an easy to make device.  Of course that device will also light up many of the world's radio telescopes who might be able to pin point it down to a fraction of an inch but it would work until someone got there and stopped it.


There are extremely easy ways to make a GPS jammer.  If you only want it to be local, it's super easy.

The problem comes when you go in for your new registration, and they read your GPS unit, and find out it doesn't work correctly.  You are going to be in for a world of trouble.
 
2013-09-02 04:01:11 AM  

kd1s: doglover: Ideas this bad? You deserve the consequences if you go through with it. Gimp all the cars and watch nobody drive a legal car ever again.

I note Ford vehicles already have speed governors in them. I rented a late model Focus a while back. The car was limited to 80MPH. If you approached it the car would warn you and then if you hit it it would refuse to go faster.

I can tell you if I were to purchase a vehicle the first thing I'd do is reverse engineer that CAN bus and make the computer think the car was only going 5MPH when you're doing a buck.


I don't know what the hell you're talking about. My wife has a 2012 Focus, and I've had it up over 115mph. It's not governed.
 
2013-09-02 06:35:53 AM  
This does say a lot about the big brother mentality of the leftists in Brussels.  However, the Germans are the paymasters of the EU and they won't be putting up with anyone messing with their high-speed fetish.  Won't happen.
 
2013-09-02 07:11:43 AM  

Z-clipped: kd1s: doglover: Ideas this bad? You deserve the consequences if you go through with it. Gimp all the cars and watch nobody drive a legal car ever again.

I note Ford vehicles already have speed governors in them. I rented a late model Focus a while back. The car was limited to 80MPH. If you approached it the car would warn you and then if you hit it it would refuse to go faster.

I can tell you if I were to purchase a vehicle the first thing I'd do is reverse engineer that CAN bus and make the computer think the car was only going 5MPH when you're doing a buck.

I don't know what the hell you're talking about. My wife has a 2012 Focus, and I've had it up over 115mph. It's not governed.


I have a feeling that the key word in his comment was 'rented'.  It wouldn't surprise me too much to find out that rental car companies arrange with the manufacturer to have governors installed before delivery.
 
ZAZ [TotalFark]
2013-09-02 10:27:57 AM  
My wife has a 2012 Focus, and I've had it up over 115mph. It's not governed.

Ford offers a programmable speed governor aimed at parents who want to keep their children slow. It also limits radio volume.
 
2013-09-02 12:27:19 PM  

Recoil Therapy: Z-clipped: kd1s: doglover: Ideas this bad? You deserve the consequences if you go through with it. Gimp all the cars and watch nobody drive a legal car ever again.

I note Ford vehicles already have speed governors in them. I rented a late model Focus a while back. The car was limited to 80MPH. If you approached it the car would warn you and then if you hit it it would refuse to go faster.

I can tell you if I were to purchase a vehicle the first thing I'd do is reverse engineer that CAN bus and make the computer think the car was only going 5MPH when you're doing a buck.

I don't know what the hell you're talking about. My wife has a 2012 Focus, and I've had it up over 115mph. It's not governed.

I have a feeling that the key word in his comment was 'rented'.  It wouldn't surprise me too much to find out that rental car companies arrange with the manufacturer to have governors installed before delivery.


My wife's Focus actually WAS a rental before she bought it. Of course, now that I think about it, governing could be done with just a special software version that could be easily changed, so who knows?

But they certainly aren't shipped to buyers that way or anything.
 
2013-09-02 01:11:58 PM  

ZAZ: My wife has a 2012 Focus, and I've had it up over 115mph. It's not governed.

Ford offers a programmable speed governor aimed at parents who want to keep their children slow. It also limits radio volume.


Ahh, missed this. There it is.
 
Displayed 50 of 100 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report