If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Guardian)   Bitcoin representatives patiently explain to the US government that math is hard   (theguardian.com) divider line 56
    More: Followup, digital currency, tax collectors  
•       •       •

2856 clicks; posted to Politics » on 27 Aug 2013 at 8:26 AM (47 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



56 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-08-27 08:33:42 AM
Pretty sure everyone involved already understands how Ponzi schemes work.
 
2013-08-27 08:35:27 AM
The Government doesn't like competition?
 
2013-08-27 08:36:43 AM

Leader O'Cola: Pretty sure everyone involved already understands how Ponzi schemes work.


But it's backed by math!

RAND PAUL
 
2013-08-27 08:39:37 AM
"Murck said the agenda of the Washington meeting was to "help regulators, policymakers and law enforcement officials better understand the Bitcoin protocol and distributed finance..."

... by transferring large amounts of untraceable cash to them ahead of their policy meeting.
 
2013-08-27 08:40:12 AM

Mjeck: The Government doesn't like competition?


Why? It already tolerates many other things that are de facto currency (frequent flyer miles being an immediate example).

Oh right democratically elected governments- even with flawed election laws- totally have no authority over the individual living in a civil society, man. Also, anyone see my lighter? I totes don't want to break the smoke cypher man.
/love weed myself, just tired of my generation
 
2013-08-27 08:42:05 AM
The whole idea of a bunch of Bitcoin guys sitting down and explaining economics to the government is just absolutely hilarious to me.
 
2013-08-27 08:42:37 AM
Bitcoin is the future. My fellow Herbalife distributors are all heavily invested and my instructors at Trump University had nothing but good things to say about it.
 
2013-08-27 08:46:33 AM
I get it that sticking it to the man is an appealing port of Bitcoin, but you should keep emotions out of your money decisions.
 
2013-08-27 08:47:03 AM
Throw them in jail for tax evasion
 
2013-08-27 08:48:35 AM

Wendy's Chili: Bitcoin is the future. My fellow Herbalife distributors are all heavily invested and my instructors at Trump University had nothing but good things to say about it.


Get back to me when Phoenix University puts out a study on how the Bitcoin is doing against the Yen and I'm buying a fleet of ASICS rigs!
/not ever touching Bitcoins as an investment, that's stupid if it's also currency especially with currency whose value is as historically volatile as Bitcoins
 
2013-08-27 08:52:37 AM

Infernalist: The whole idea of a bunch of Bitcoin guys sitting down and explaining economics to the government is just absolutely hilarious to me.



I can see it now:

pjmedia.com
 
2013-08-27 08:55:34 AM

Lost Thought 00: Throw them in jail for tax evasion


Only if they fail to pay taxes on their bitcoin income.
 
2013-08-27 08:59:14 AM
Authorities have expressed concerns about potential money laundering abuses and its use in funding illegal activities including drug purchases.

So, just like U.S. Dollars?
 
2013-08-27 09:02:40 AM

Lost Thought 00: Throw them in jail for tax evasion


Do you have evidence the people at the Bitcoin foundation are using it to avoid taxes?

Bitcoin by design must make all transactions public record. It's actually a poor platform for hiding assets. Hiding purchases is easier but what you are holding is much harder.
 
2013-08-27 09:04:49 AM

Crotchrocket Slim: /not ever touching Bitcoins as an investment, that's stupid if it's also currency especially with currency whose value is as historically volatile as Bitcoins


That's the thing. It has some legitimate utility as an alternative to online payment systems like Paypal, but most of the people treating it like an investment have no idea what they're doing. And if they do know what they're doing, they probably deserve a visit from the SEC.
 
d23 [TotalFark]
2013-08-27 09:07:10 AM
warning: don't expect intelligent discussion on this topic on Fark.

Some subjects, yeah, but this is way too complex and there are too many assholes that just want to scream "PONZI!?!?!11" and go away.
 
2013-08-27 09:35:24 AM

Wendy's Chili: most of the people treating it like an investment have no idea what they're doing.


I transferred my 401K to bitcoins.  Who'll be laughing in the post-apocalyptic society?
 
2013-08-27 09:39:37 AM

d23: warning: don't expect intelligent discussion on this topic on Fark.

Some subjects, yeah, but this is way too complex and there are too many assholes that just want to scream "PONZI!?!?!11" and go away.


Light some candles, then, and stop cursing the darkness.
 
2013-08-27 09:42:56 AM

t3knomanser: Lost Thought 00: Throw them in jail for tax evasion

Only if they fail to pay taxes on their bitcoin income.


Thinking about this more, since bitcoins aren't actual currency like RMB or GBP, and you can acquire them in a new way (mining), it doesn't seem like you'd be required to pay taxes on bitcoins you mined and then used to buy something digital. It seems like it's only when you convert them into hard currency that you'd be required to pay a capital gains tax.

That seems like a great way to deduct a shiny new GPU.
 
2013-08-27 09:57:20 AM
Bitcoins are just drug gift certificates.  Remember that this holiday season.
 
2013-08-27 09:58:43 AM
Good farking luck explaining that to Congress. As will be evident in this thread, even people who think they're tech savy have no farking clue how it works, so yeah good luck with Congress.
 
2013-08-27 10:01:34 AM

d23: warning: don't expect intelligent discussion on this topic on Fark.


Intelligent discussion is here defined as "discussion that agrees with you".
 
2013-08-27 10:02:00 AM

Crotchrocket Slim: Get back to me when Phoenix University puts out a study on how the Bitcoin is doing against the Yen and I'm buying a fleet of ASICS rigs!
/not ever touching Bitcoins as an investment, that's stupid if it's also currency especially with currency whose value is as historically volatile as Bitcoins


You don't "invest" in Bitcoins.  You use them to buy heroin and anti-aircraft missiles and sex slaves.  And the dealers hedge their bitcoin transfers to account for the volatility while your goods are in transit.  So you can see why the government would want to get in on the action.
 
2013-08-27 10:02:44 AM

js34603: people who think they're tech savy have no farking clue how it works


Looks like bitcoin does what it's designed to do, then.
 
2013-08-27 10:07:19 AM
I wonder if they bothered to explain the part about how this "miracle currency" has a built-in supply limit designed to create inflation once miners run out of "buttcoins" (as my friends endearingly call them" to mineBut at least they'll always have Germany
 
2013-08-27 10:14:36 AM

Crotchrocket Slim: Get back to me when Phoenix University puts out a study on how the Bitcoin is doing against the Yen and I'm buying a fleet of ASICS rigs!


My new Bitcoin mint:
runningshoes6.webs.com

/cheap joke


Muta: I transferred my 401K to bitcoins.  Who'll be laughing in the post-apocalyptic society?

Exactly. Just wait until all the computers are destroyed in the EMP. None of you will have access to your bank accounts, and my bitcoins will be there to make me ruler over the remnants of humanity!

/Baldrick-approved plan
 
2013-08-27 10:16:20 AM

clkeagle: Exactly. Just wait until all the computers are destroyed in the EMP. None of you will have access to your bank accounts, and my bitcoins will be there to make me ruler over the remnants of humanity!


I always knew the Abacus would make a comeback.
 
2013-08-27 10:18:09 AM
The US government is the largest employer of mathematicians in the world. They don't need to be told math is hard. I'm not saying everyone there can add, but if there's some math that needs to be understood, they can usually do it. And if they can't, they just haul someone in from Berkeley or Princeton for a few days to work on it.
Some farking amateur came up with a protocol, and a bunch of dorks want to pretend that they're the only ones who understand it, and everyone is against them for the usual reasons, that they're so smart and no one understands them. The truth of the matter is much simpler: the dorks have made a market, and someone is going to try to rook the market. Maybe someone has already done it. It's not even about the math, it's about the market.
 
2013-08-27 10:21:02 AM
I'll be the first to say that I don't know a lot about Bitcoin, but there's an awful lot that doesn't seem right to me.

Unless a vendor accepts Bitcoins, they're useless and have no purchasing power at all. If you transfer money to someone else in the US or Russia, or where ever, what good are Bitcoins to them? Aren't they going to want local currency to buy goods?

Am I completely wrong about the concept of Bitcoins? I'm not ruling that out.
 
2013-08-27 10:21:31 AM
BTC is a fine concept but a terrible idea for practical use. Most of the advantages, like anonymity, are not particularity true( http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.4524 ) and this even makes it's use for drugs suspect. On it's own, it can serve as the base for something bigger, which I'm convinced will come down the pike sooner or later.

The thing that sends it over the top though is the community. LOLibertarians, morons with too much cash (there's idiots on the BTC forums throwing 50K+ as recently as last week into this), scammers and "Sovereign Citizens" types who believe it will enable them to go "off the grid". Pirateat40, the guy who pulled off the funniest scam on the forums so far, is getting his ass prosecuted by the SEC finally. Best part is he only made 150K or so off of it.

Bitcoin!

Other hilarious highlights include:

-The LOLibertarian infiltrating a forum of camgirls to convince them to take BTC. He posed as a women until they outed him, then he got huffy, called them "feminazis and biatches" and left. Comedy gold.

-The various idiots trying to live of bitcoin but who end up cheating or just trading their electronic hashes to people who give them real money to live on. There's a couple right now trying to film a documentary and the way they operate is simply to get other people to purchase items and paying those people a premium to do so.

-The SEC and some EU regulatory agencies are taking steps to crack down on the exchanges and enforce tax payment on larger BTC holders. Go ahead and try to cash out right now. Go to Magic: The Gathering On-Line Exchange and try to cash out. Good luck!

-What somebody mentioned above, most of the BTC isn't even liquid, it's held by hoarders and "investors".

-If you want a good laugh, read up on Butterfly Labs and their scam business to provide ASICs and other equipment to bitcoin miners. 99% of which has never been delivered. No refunds now either.

Essentially bitcoin is like every other internet phenomenon. Supposedly what was the "next big thing" has turned into a joke on the very people who shill for it.

And don't forget Bruce and Bitcoin Show. He was the best.
 
d23 [TotalFark]
2013-08-27 10:27:02 AM
Why would I make another comment?  Everyone else here is so much smarter than I am... heh.

A great way to tell if something is important is to see who it's pissing off.
 
2013-08-27 10:31:50 AM

Marcus Aurelius: Crotchrocket Slim: Get back to me when Phoenix University puts out a study on how the Bitcoin is doing against the Yen and I'm buying a fleet of ASICS rigs!
/not ever touching Bitcoins as an investment, that's stupid if it's also currency especially with currency whose value is as historically volatile as Bitcoins

You don't "invest" in Bitcoins.  You use them to buy heroin and anti-aircraft missiles and sex slaves.  And the dealers hedge their bitcoin transfers to account for the volatility while your goods are in transit.  So you can see why the government would want to get in on the action.


Hmmm maybe I should give Bitcoins another look, despite my disinterest in heroin.

AIN'T NOBODY BOMBING MY HAREM
 
2013-08-27 10:38:09 AM

d23: Why would I make another comment?  Everyone else here is so much smarter than I am... heh.

A great way to tell if something is important is to see who it's pissing off.


But it's not important in the way you think it is. It's actually quite useless. The Feds are interested because of potential uses for money laundering (that's why the exchanges have been put on ice) and the amount of btc that certain hoarders investors have accumulated.

BTC is useless because anybody who's "getting rich" off of it is just cashing out to USD or Euros, or was until the exchanges start serving the US again. The only people who are sticking with it are "true believers" who dump their wife's 401K or their life savings, only to get scammed out of 80% of it. Oh, and the guys at BFL who have scammed sold many ASICs and other parts to suckers customers (99% of whom are still waiting.)

Go ahead and dump your wife's 401K into it. You'll get scammed out of it and get back 20%. up, uP, UP!
 
2013-08-27 10:44:59 AM

d23: Why would I make another comment?  Everyone else here is so much smarter than I am... heh.

A great way to tell if something is important is to see who it's pissing off.


Well when you leave gems like this static filled post:

d23: warning: don't expect intelligent discussion on this topic on Fark.

Some subjects, yeah, but this is way too complex and there are too many assholes that just want to scream "PONZI!?!?!11" and go away.


... expect not to have an intelligent discussion. If all you've presented is flimsily rationalized pessimism and should someone engage you on what issues they might have with Bitcoins and all you do is get huffy or offer even more flimsy rationalizations (as what I've seen from BTC supporters on Fark about this) why the hell talk to you?

You want intelligent discussion, do your part and bring some intelligent discussion into here. If the whole world is full of crazy people to you, maybe it's you who is not sane.
 
2013-08-27 10:49:11 AM

trotsky: BTC is a fine concept but a terrible idea for practical use. Most of the advantages, like anonymity, are not particularity true( http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.4524 ) and this even makes it's use for drugs suspect. On it's own, it can serve as the base for something bigger, which I'm convinced will come down the pike sooner or later.

The thing that sends it over the top though is the community. LOLibertarians, morons with too much cash (there's idiots on the BTC forums throwing 50K+ as recently as last week into this), scammers and "Sovereign Citizens" types who believe it will enable them to go "off the grid". Pirateat40, the guy who pulled off the funniest scam on the forums so far, is getting his ass prosecuted by the SEC finally. Best part is he only made 150K or so off of it.

Bitcoin!

Other hilarious highlights include:

-The LOLibertarian infiltrating a forum of camgirls to convince them to take BTC. He posed as a women until they outed him, then he got huffy, called them "feminazis and biatches" and left. Comedy gold.

-The various idiots trying to live of bitcoin but who end up cheating or just trading their electronic hashes to people who give them real money to live on. There's a couple right now trying to film a documentary and the way they operate is simply to get other people to purchase items and paying those people a premium to do so.

-The SEC and some EU regulatory agencies are taking steps to crack down on the exchanges and enforce tax payment on larger BTC holders. Go ahead and try to cash out right now. Go to Magic: The Gathering On-Line Exchange and try to cash out. Good luck!

-What somebody mentioned above, most of the BTC isn't even liquid, it's held by hoarders and "investors".

-If you want a good laugh, read up on Butterfly Labs and their scam business to provide ASICs and other equipment to bitcoin miners. 99% of which has never been delivered. No refunds now either.

Essentially bitcoin is like every other internet phenomenon. Supposedly w ...


Basically even if BTC prices stabilized and more people I wanted to do commerce with would accept them, I might consider picking a few up. That said I'd never consider BTC to be a money-generating enterprise in and of itself, and the fact that the community around it has such an idea is enough to sour me on BTC's as they presently are. It's not a Ponzi but it does seem to be structured as a very gameable system that benefits early adopters at the expense of newcomers, so cries of Ponzi are only natural.
 
2013-08-27 10:50:44 AM

trotsky: this even makes it's use for drugs suspect


I always thought the whole process of receiving the drugs made its use for drugs suspect. I can't imagine a system where I would feel safe using bitcoin to purchase illegal goods from a remote seller.
 
2013-08-27 10:54:00 AM

Crotchrocket Slim: d23: Why would I make another comment?  Everyone else here is so much smarter than I am... heh.

A great way to tell if something is important is to see who it's pissing off.

Well when you leave gems like this static filled post:

d23: warning: don't expect intelligent discussion on this topic on Fark.

Some subjects, yeah, but this is way too complex and there are too many assholes that just want to scream "PONZI!?!?!11" and go away.

... expect not to have an intelligent discussion. If all you've presented is flimsily rationalized pessimism and should someone engage you on what issues they might have with Bitcoins and all you do is get huffy or offer even more flimsy rationalizations (as what I've seen from BTC supporters on Fark about this) why the hell talk to you?

You want intelligent discussion, do your part and bring some intelligent discussion into here. If the whole world is full of crazy people to you, maybe it's you who is not sane.


This is the buttcoin way. He's acting pretty much like a bitcoin forums professional. Any time somebody calls out a blatantly obvious scam they're shouted down with "FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt)!!!!" and that this FUD prevents them from investing their wife's 401K or their life savings into an obvious ponzi scheme. There is no rational discussion on the bitcoin forums. One thread called out Butterfly Labs as an obvious scam only to get regulated to the "German Language" part of the forum. It was a rational OP asking reasonable questions to the shiatbags at BFL.

The guy who runs the bitcoin forums has taken in thousands in donations to "upgrade" yet has never did a thing to the forums. Ever.

The professional buttcoiner's response to all this is exactly what we're seeing with Mr. d23. Call everybody else crazy and revel in their perpetual smugness. I find it hilarious and not altogether out of the mainstream for buttcoin.

Any peer to peer currency will have to overcome the hurdle of it's user base in order to become widely accepted.

Hey, d23, do you go to a restaurant and tip the server in bitcoins? Because that's a very popular way of being a douchbag on the forums. Imagine this: you're 21 year old women working at a Applebees as you're going to school. Not only does the creepy guy in the fedora clumsily hit on you but he leaves you a piece of paper with a long string of numbers and letters on it, along with instructions on how to set up a wallet.dat on your school laptop. You do so, why not, but this was a pretty shiatty tip. Even shiattier when you find out the guy only tipped you $0.78 in bitcoins.
 
2013-08-27 10:56:47 AM

trotsky: Hey, d23, do you go to a restaurant and tip the server in bitcoins? Because that's a very popular way of being a douchbag on the forums. Imagine this: you're 21 year old women working at a Applebees as you're going to school. Not only does the creepy guy in the fedora clumsily hit on you but he leaves you a piece of paper with a long string of numbers and letters on it, along with instructions on how to set up a wallet.dat on your school laptop. You do so, why not, but this was a pretty shiatty tip. Even shiattier when you find out the guy only tipped you $0.78 in bitcoins.


Now that is some funny sh*t right there.

/Fedora LOL
 
2013-08-27 11:04:29 AM
Wow. I am not involved with, and I have no plans to be involved with BitCoins but I am shocked by the haters in this thread.

It seems mostly like a curiosity. Anyone who invests substantial sums of money into this is probably not the savviest investor. That being said, who cares what people do with their disposable income? If you think BitCoins are stupid, no on is forcing you to get involved. I think it will be interesting to see what happens with the currency.

It is my personal opinion that the currency will eventually collapse. It only has worth insofar as it can be exchanged for real currency. Once the powers that be strangle that exchange, the currency will go bust.
 
2013-08-27 11:12:22 AM

manbart: It seems mostly like a curiosity. Anyone  who invests substantial sums of money into this is probably not the savviest investor. That being said, who cares what people do with their disposable income? If you think BitCoins are stupid, no on is forcing you to get involved. I think it will be interesting to see what happens with the currency.


Making fun of people we think are unsavy investors- especially investors as insufferable as BTC supporters tend to be- is like the entire purpose of Fark. I don't care or get upset when a fool and his money is parted; I actually experience a little schadenfreude. That said these discussions serve to further document issues with the concept of Bitcoins and the occasionally* lackluster way they've been deployed, which admittedly enables rationalized smugness in me. These threads are smug-investments for all involved, really.

It is my personal opinion that the currency will eventually collapse. It only has worth insofar as it can be exchanged for real currency. Once the powers that be strangle that exchange, the currency will go bust.

I agree but not for the reasons you think. People seem to be getting involved with BTC as they think it's a secure way to do illegal business or tax-free business and neither is true or feasible. Once investors realize that even if we establish Bitcoins as a viable long-term digital currency, they are still subject to the laws of the land and this will kill a lot of interest in Bitcoins. Shame- it's a victim of its own marketing in that case.

*usually
 
2013-08-27 11:17:31 AM

trotsky: the guy only tipped you $0.78 in bitcoins.


That's a pretty hefty tip these days.
 
2013-08-27 11:27:26 AM

Crotchrocket Slim: manbart: It seems mostly like a curiosity. Anyone  who invests substantial sums of money into this is probably not the savviest investor. That being said, who cares what people do with their disposable income? If you think BitCoins are stupid, no on is forcing you to get involved. I think it will be interesting to see what happens with the currency.

Making fun of people we think are unsavy investors- especially investors as insufferable as BTC supporters tend to be- is like the entire purpose of Fark. I don't care or get upset when a fool and his money is parted; I actually experience a little schadenfreude. That said these discussions serve to further document issues with the concept of Bitcoins and the occasionally* lackluster way they've been deployed, which admittedly enables rationalized smugness in me. These threads are smug-investments for all involved, really.

It is my personal opinion that the currency will eventually collapse. It only has worth insofar as it can be exchanged for real currency. Once the powers that be strangle that exchange, the currency will go bust.

I agree but not for the reasons you think. People seem to be getting involved with BTC as they think it's a secure way to do illegal business or tax-free business and neither is true or feasible. Once investors realize that even if we establish Bitcoins as a viable long-term digital currency, they are still subject to the laws of the land and this will kill a lot of interest in Bitcoins. Shame- it's a victim of its own marketing in that case.

*usually


Exactly, and most are finding this out the hard way as the SEC and the Euro equivalent are taking notice of the amount of transactions and the illegal aspects, such as Silk Road. This was, frankly, bound to occur eventually and only a fool or a true believer would think otherwise. For a P-to-p currency to really work, it would have to build itself from the ground up with regulations and laws in mind. This would go a long way towards avoiding any entanglements.

Bitcoin's primary problem is that it was based off drugs and money laundering right off; not a auspicious start for any currency hoping to acquire a foothold as alternative form of payment and exchange. I said it above and I'll repeat myself: the biggest problem with bitcoin is it's user base.
 
2013-08-27 11:29:10 AM

trotsky: This would go a long way towards avoiding any entanglements


images4.wikia.nocookie.net

"Let's just say we'd like to avoid any regulatory entanglements".

/wrong pic, I know
 
2013-08-27 11:39:21 AM

manbart: It is my personal opinion that the currency will eventually collapse. It only has worth insofar as it can be exchanged for real currency.


If you're confused by the haters in this thread, express that opinion to a Bitcoin true believer. You will quickly find out what we're on about.
 
2013-08-27 11:43:43 AM

Muta: Wendy's Chili: most of the people treating it like an investment have no idea what they're doing.

I transferred my 401K to bitcoins.  Who'll be laughing in the post-apocalyptic society?


Me. I transferred all my savings to bottle caps.
 
2013-08-27 11:43:52 AM

trotsky: Exactly, and most are finding this out the hard way as the SEC and the Euro equivalent are taking notice of the amount of transactions and the illegal aspects, such as Silk Road. This was, frankly, bound to occur eventually and only a fool or a true believer would think otherwise. For a P-to-p currency to really work, it would have to build itself from the ground up with regulations and laws in mind. This would go a long way towards avoiding any entanglements.

Bitcoin's primary problem is that it was based off drugs and money laundering right off; not a auspicious start for any currency hoping to acquire a foothold as alternative form of payment and exchange. I said it above and I'll repeat myself: the biggest problem with bitcoin is it's user base.


I think this misses the point. BitCoin was created anonymously, and the creator is apparently no longer involved in the project. It always seemed more like an experimental concept more than an actual attempt to create a business. As an experiment in cyberspace, I would say it has been a resounding success.

BitCoin may have been a driving force in things like the Silk Road, but drugs sell themselves and the internet offers anonymity to some extent. Because of these factors, I think online drug sales are here to stay regardless of the method of currency transfer. Once BitCoins cannot be exchanged for real currency, I don't think drug dealers will have any interest in accepting them. They will find a new way to transfer funds, there is enough money at stake in the drug trade for them to figure this out.
 
2013-08-27 11:47:58 AM

thurstonxhowell: manbart: It is my personal opinion that the currency will eventually collapse. It only has worth insofar as it can be exchanged for real currency.

If you're confused by the haters in this thread, express that opinion to a Bitcoin true believer. You will quickly find out what we're on about.


I've seen how "believers" of things act. Good luck ranting and raving to change people's minds.
 
2013-08-27 12:08:06 PM
The only thing I have to say on BTC: The system can't scale to an economy of any significant size, which makes it worthless for anything EXCEPT supporting a small, fringe grey or black market economy.
 
2013-08-27 12:28:54 PM

d23: warning: don't expect intelligent discussion on this topic on Fark.

Some subjects, yeah, but this is way too complex and there are too many assholes that just want to scream "PONZI!?!?!11" and go away.


How dare they call a ponzi scheme a ponzi scheme!
 
2013-08-27 12:39:12 PM

manbart: trotsky: Exactly, and most are finding this out the hard way as the SEC and the Euro equivalent are taking notice of the amount of transactions and the illegal aspects, such as Silk Road. This was, frankly, bound to occur eventually and only a fool or a true believer would think otherwise. For a P-to-p currency to really work, it would have to build itself from the ground up with regulations and laws in mind. This would go a long way towards avoiding any entanglements.

Bitcoin's primary problem is that it was based off drugs and money laundering right off; not a auspicious start for any currency hoping to acquire a foothold as alternative form of payment and exchange. I said it above and I'll repeat myself: the biggest problem with bitcoin is it's user base.

I think this misses the point. BitCoin was created anonymously, and the creator is apparently no longer involved in the project. It always seemed more like an experimental concept more than an actual attempt to create a business. As an experiment in cyberspace, I would say it has been a resounding success.

BitCoin may have been a driving force in things like the Silk Road, but drugs sell themselves and the internet offers anonymity to some extent. Because of these factors, I think online drug sales are here to stay regardless of the method of currency transfer. Once BitCoins cannot be exchanged for real currency, I don't think drug dealers will have any interest in accepting them. They will find a new way to transfer funds, there is enough money at stake in the drug trade for them to figure this out.


There is a viable way for drug dealers to do business- just deal in cold hard cash. Why anyone would even consider buying drugs online- even if we ignore that the government excels at monitoring online communication- when you could be buying product you have tested and confirmed is good from a local buyer is beyond me.
 
Displayed 50 of 56 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report