Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(New York Daily News)   California man kills mom and burns house before going on tractor rampage. Thank God the cops had a tank to stop him   (nydailynews.com) divider line 114
    More: Obvious, Ryan Carnan, Officers Call, mothers  
•       •       •

7453 clicks; posted to Main » on 26 Aug 2013 at 4:30 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



114 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-08-26 07:13:29 AM  

ReverendJasen: No reasons.  They should be given anything they ask for.  How else would they take out wackjobs on tractors?  Just think if they had access to mortars... could've just dropped a couple of those on the guy from half a mile away and ended it even faster.
I trust them implicitly.


so you're unable to name one reason. Ok.

doglover: When was the last time you saw them need light armor?


It's not "light armor". It's an armored personal carrier. It keeps the people inside from getting shot. that's all.

doglover: This is just a toy they bought with taxpayer money.


uh huh. ok.
 
2013-08-26 07:13:43 AM  

The more you eat the more you fart: Police are NOT military..they are law enforcement...and should NOT have access to or use military-style equipment to wage war against the populace.


So no guns, bullet proof vests, or night vision then.
 
2013-08-26 07:17:06 AM  

Satanic_Hamster: The more you eat the more you fart: Police are NOT military..they are law enforcement...and should NOT have access to or use military-style equipment to wage war against the populace.

So no guns, bullet proof vests, or night vision then.


Guns yes...full auto guns? No

Level IIA vests? Yes. Level IV military plate vests? No.

Night vision? Yes.

APCs or tanks? No.
 
2013-08-26 07:17:35 AM  

The more you eat the more you fart: If non-cops are not allowed certain types of weapons/armor systems because they are not military, then the same rule should apply to cops...because they are not military.


It's not a "weapon system", It's an armored car. It's not made to shoot people, it's made to keep the people inside from being shot. also It's perfectly legal to own an armored car/personal carrier.

Now for the second half of my question,  "Do you have any information about them being misused? "
 
2013-08-26 07:18:59 AM  
You guys are just over-reacting again.
This story is why I think the police 'copters should be outfitted with Hellfires.  Would make police chases real interesting.
 
2013-08-26 07:22:53 AM  

log_jammin: The more you eat the more you fart: If non-cops are not allowed certain types of weapons/armor systems because they are not military, then the same rule should apply to cops...because they are not military.

It's not a "weapon system", It's an armored car. It's not made to shoot people, it's made to keep the people inside from being shot. also It's perfectly legal to own an armored car/personal carrier.

Now for the second half of my question,  "Do you have any information about them being misused? "


Popular science article two years ago nyc.

Swat commander regularly rolls up on a random scene in apc's because in his words "We are in the business of intimidation, and that means displaying a show of force."

They dont need the protection...they just want to scare people into compliance.

Sounds like another group from history...

Btw: a 7mmMAG or 338Laupa with steel core ammo will perforate 7mm of mild steel rolled homogenous armor like that used on the police's apc. Just saying.
 
2013-08-26 07:23:06 AM  

ReverendJasen: This story is why I think the police 'copters should be outfitted with Hellfires.


what weapon was this armored car equipped with?
 
2013-08-26 07:23:24 AM  

The more you eat the more you fart: Easy: because this isnt a war zone and the cops (despite their wet dreams of being in combat) aren't fighting the taliban.


You don't consider an armed individual on a tractor, randomly shooting at civilians, a domestic terrorist?

The more you eat the more you fart: Police are NOT military..they are law enforcement...and should NOT have access to or use military-style equipment to wage war against the populace.


They didn't wage war against the populace, they went after one gunman who was waging war against the populace by driving around on a tractor randomly shooting at people.
 
2013-08-26 07:24:27 AM  

The more you eat the more you fart: Swat commander regularly rolls up on a random scene in apc's because in his words "We are in the business of intimidation, and that means displaying a show of force."

They dont need the protection...they just want to scare people into compliance.


so in other words, because they look scary.

Got it.
 
2013-08-26 07:26:05 AM  
The militarization of the police has another unintended side effect: it makes people who are very wary of a heavily armed force whose purpose is keeping the citizens from getting all uppity (sorta like how the founding fathers were wary of the same) ensure they have weapons capable of defeating police armor.
 
2013-08-26 07:27:09 AM  

log_jammin: The more you eat the more you fart: Swat commander regularly rolls up on a random scene in apc's because in his words "We are in the business of intimidation, and that means displaying a show of force."

They dont need the protection...they just want to scare people into compliance.

so in other words, because they look scary.

Got it.


Boy you're pretty dumb arent you...
 
2013-08-26 07:28:02 AM  

ReapTheChaos: The more you eat the more you fart: Easy: because this isnt a war zone and the cops (despite their wet dreams of being in combat) aren't fighting the taliban.

You don't consider an armed individual on a tractor, randomly shooting at civilians, a domestic terrorist?

The more you eat the more you fart: Police are NOT military..they are law enforcement...and should NOT have access to or use military-style equipment to wage war against the populace.

They didn't wage war against the populace, they went after one gunman who was waging war against the populace by driving around on a tractor randomly shooting at people.


An open cab john deere isnt a farking tank.
 
2013-08-26 07:30:49 AM  

log_jammin: The more you eat the more you fart: If non-cops are not allowed certain types of weapons/armor systems because they are not military, then the same rule should apply to cops...because they are not military.

It's not a "weapon system", It's an armored car. It's not made to shoot people, it's made to keep the people inside from being shot. also It's perfectly legal to own an armored car/personal carrier.

Now for the second half of my question,  "Do you have any information about them being misused? "


Pepper spray has been misused to the tune of a 5.1 million dollar wrongful death settlement. Anything in a cops arsenal will be misused sooner or later. There aren't enough of these on the road to have rolled over a pregnant woman yet. But it will happen.
 
2013-08-26 07:31:34 AM  

The more you eat the more you fart: Boy you're pretty dumb arent you...


"they just want to scare people into compliance."
 
2013-08-26 07:31:39 AM  

log_jammin: The more you eat the more you fart: Swat commander regularly rolls up on a random scene in apc's because in his words "We are in the business of intimidation, and that means displaying a show of force."

They dont need the protection...they just want to scare people into compliance.

so in other words, because they look scary.

Got it.


P.s. remember that next time you vote for an "assaukt weapon"ban.
 
2013-08-26 07:32:26 AM  

log_jammin: what weapon was this armored car equipped with?


That's what I'm saying!  They should have had a .50cal Browning mounted to that baby, but thanks to all the pansy cop-haters that'll never happen.
 
2013-08-26 07:32:53 AM  

log_jammin: It's not "light armor". It's an armored personal carrier.


Remember how you were lambasting some up thread for making up definitions of words?

APC, Armored Personnel Carrier, has armor right in the name. It's armor.

It's not a heavy tank.

Armor, lighter than a tank... light armor.
 
2013-08-26 07:32:59 AM  

RaceBoatDriver: Pepper spray has been misused to the tune of a 5.1 million dollar wrongful death settlement. Anything in a cops arsenal will be misused sooner or later. There aren't enough of these on the road to have rolled over a pregnant woman yet. But it will happen.


so because pepper spray has been misused, armored cars should be banned. ok
 
2013-08-26 07:33:25 AM  

log_jammin: The more you eat the more you fart: Boy you're pretty dumb arent you...

"they just want to scare people into compliance."


Sorta like the nazi's...who used overwhelming force to intimidate people into giving up their freedom to avoid confrontation.

Weird huh?
 
2013-08-26 07:33:38 AM  

ReverendJasen: log_jammin: what weapon was this armored car equipped with?

That's what I'm saying!  They should have had a .50cal Browning mounted to that baby, but thanks to all the pansy cop-haters that'll never happen.


well that's pretty stupid.
 
2013-08-26 07:34:45 AM  

ReverendJasen: log_jammin: what weapon was this armored car equipped with?

That's what I'm saying!  They should have had a .50cal Browning mounted to that baby, but thanks to all the pansy cop-haters that'll never happen.


Dont forget TOW missiles to bring car chases to a quick stop.
 
2013-08-26 07:35:49 AM  

The more you eat the more you fart: Swat commander regularly rolls up on a random scene in apc's because in his words "We are in the business of intimidation, and that means displaying a show of force."

They dont need the protection...they just want to scare people into compliance.


Good. If some nut job was driving around my neighborhood on a tractor randomly shooting at people, I sure as hell want his sorry ass to be intimidated when the cops show up.

The more you eat the more you fart: An open cab john deere isnt a farking tank.


You seem to have missed all the news articles over the years about people doing things like this:

www.damninteresting.net
i.crackedcdn.com
 
2013-08-26 07:35:50 AM  
LAPD parking lot?

i30.photobucket.com
 
2013-08-26 07:36:38 AM  

log_jammin: ReverendJasen: log_jammin: what weapon was this armored car equipped with?

That's what I'm saying!  They should have had a .50cal Browning mounted to that baby, but thanks to all the pansy cop-haters that'll never happen.

well that's pretty stupid.


http://reason.com/blog/2008/09/01/sheriff-lotts-new-toy

Too late.
 
2013-08-26 07:36:58 AM  

The more you eat the more you fart: P.s. remember that next time you vote for an "assaukt weapon"ban.


ok?

The more you eat the more you fart: Sorta like the nazi's...who used overwhelming force to intimidate people into giving up their freedom to avoid confrontation.


this sentence is in English yet it makes no sense.

used force to avoid confrontation? wtf?

doglover: Remember how you were lambasting some up thread for making up definitions of words?

APC, Armored Personnel Carrier, has armor right in the name. It's armor.

It's not a heavy tank.

Armor, lighter than a tank... light armor.


yes I remember. and you're making up definitions.
 
2013-08-26 07:38:08 AM  

ReapTheChaos: You don't consider an armed individual on a tractor, randomly shooting at civilians, a domestic terrorist?


Not unless the attack was politically motivated.

So, for example, the attack on Sandy Hook wasn't terrorism, in that the motives weren't political, but the Boston bombing was a terrorist attack, because the motives were political.

It's pretty easy to distinguish between the two, really.

Also, it doesn't look like they actually used the APC:

Police readied a SWAT team, but other officers arrived first and killed Carnan during a deadly confrontation, police said.

Sounds like the first officers on the scene engaged the shooter immediately, which is the current doctrine with an active shooter.  The SWAT team would have been the one with the APC, and the guy was already dead when they got there.
 
2013-08-26 07:39:32 AM  

RaceBoatDriver: There aren't enough of these on the road to have rolled over a pregnant woman yet. But it will happen.


Because you couldn't drive over a pregnant woman with any other vehicle, say a car, right?
 
2013-08-26 07:40:10 AM  

ReapTheChaos: Good. If some nut job was driving around my neighborhood on a tractor randomly shooting at people, I sure as hell want his sorry ass to be intimidated when the cops show up.


I would hope that if that happened anywhere in my neighborhood, that he'd end up with a .308, .270, .30-30, or .30'06 in the chest before he got very far.

/Lots of deer rifles in houses around here.
 
2013-08-26 07:40:50 AM  
As National Journal reported in 2000, in the first three years after the 1994 law alone, the Pentagon distributed 3,800 M-16s, 2,185 M-14s, 73 grenade launchers, and 112 armored personnel carriers to civilian police agencies across America. Domestic police agencies also got bayonets, tanks, helicopters and even airplanes.

Care to change your tune? What the FARK do cops need grenade launchers and bayonets for?
 
2013-08-26 07:40:57 AM  

log_jammin: yes I remember. and you're making up definitions.


No, I'm using established definitions.

If the people selling APCs are calling them light armored vehicle, who am I to judge?
 
2013-08-26 07:41:22 AM  

log_jammin: well that's pretty stupid.


It is stupid, but most people seem to have a fear of authority and won't let us arm the cops the way they need to be.
 
2013-08-26 07:42:52 AM  

dittybopper: ReapTheChaos: Good. If some nut job was driving around my neighborhood on a tractor randomly shooting at people, I sure as hell want his sorry ass to be intimidated when the cops show up.

I would hope that if that happened anywhere in my neighborhood, that he'd end up with a .308, .270, .30-30, or .30'06 in the chest before he got very far.

/Lots of deer rifles in houses around here.


That is what i said: shooter in open cab tractor = one rifle round.
 
2013-08-26 07:43:11 AM  
Good morning to you, too, Fark.
 
2013-08-26 07:51:40 AM  

The more you eat the more you fart: dittybopper: ReapTheChaos: Good. If some nut job was driving around my neighborhood on a tractor randomly shooting at people, I sure as hell want his sorry ass to be intimidated when the cops show up.

I would hope that if that happened anywhere in my neighborhood, that he'd end up with a .308, .270, .30-30, or .30'06 in the chest before he got very far.

/Lots of deer rifles in houses around here.

That is what i said: shooter in open cab tractor = one rifle round.


Not only that, but it sounds like he was armed just with a pistol.   If he's driving the tractor, that means he can't hit for shiat because he's shooting one handed on a bouncing, moving platform, which is probably why no one was killed in the "tractor rampage" part of this incident (he killed his mother prior to that phase of the incident).

That being the case, you could hit him from 75 or 100 yards away and not worry about him hitting you.  You would have to be very unlikely indeed for someone to hit you under those conditions, and he doesn't have to know that you're there.  It's OK to shoot someone like that in the back.
 
2013-08-26 07:52:06 AM  

ReapTheChaos: The more you eat the more you fart: Easy: because this isnt a war zone and the cops (despite their wet dreams of being in combat) aren't fighting the taliban.

You don't consider an armed individual on a tractor, randomly shooting at civilians, a domestic terrorist?

No, one person randomly shooting people is not a terrorist.  They are normally mentally ill, or just bad people.  In your statement, ANYONE who shoots more than 1 person is a terrorist.  Pull your head out of your ass.

The more you eat the more you fart: Police are NOT military..they are law enforcement...and should NOT have access to or use military-style equipment to wage war against the populace.

They didn't wage war against the populace, they went after one gunman who was waging war against the populace by driving around on a tractor randomly shooting at people.

He was not waging war moran.  Someone who gets on an open cab tractor, and starts firing shots off is not waging war, he is looking for attention.  And he got it.  It was probably a suicide by cop situation.  Notice that he only killed one person.  Sounds like a mental problem.  Of course we should respond as if he is an invading country.

Enjoy your day sheep...
 
2013-08-26 08:05:27 AM  

doglover: The more you eat the more you fart: If non-cops are not allowed certain types of weapons/armor systems because they are not military, then the same rule should apply to cops...because they are not military.

I think you can buy one of those from Russia.

Link

But the cops don't need one.


Yeah...I'm not buying a tank from a website that can't spell "legacy" properly...no matter how much I want one.
 
2013-08-26 08:07:15 AM  
Man, bootlickers constantly amaze me. The police are given APCs (and apparently farking grenade launchers) and they just can't see a problem.

Fun fact, lapdogs, "it looks scary" actually does mean quite a bit. It's propaganda. Dark colors, covered faces, and intimidating looks have been an effecting persuasive tool since evolution kicked off. Not to mention it's nothing more than a big, rolling waste of money.

But hey, no problem, right? The cops need this kind of shiat, right? I mean, the world has become just so dangerous, hasn't it?
 
2013-08-26 08:07:52 AM  

The more you eat the more you fart: As National Journal reported in 2000, in the first three years after the 1994 law alone, the Pentagon distributed 3,800 M-16s, 2,185 M-14s, 73 grenade launchers, and 112 armored personnel carriers to civilian police agencies across America. Domestic police agencies also got bayonets, tanks, helicopters and even airplanes.

Care to change your tune? What the FARK do cops need grenade launchers and bayonets for?


Hippies, aka The Eternal Menace.
 
2013-08-26 08:08:35 AM  

PunGent: Yeah...I'm not buying a tank from a website that can't spell "legacy" properly...no matter how much I want one.


Don't be a pussy, these guys seem legit.

I mean, have you ever heard of shady business deals in Russia?
 
2013-08-26 08:13:28 AM  
Officers rushed to the home on Mellow Lane

Not so much apparently.
 
2013-08-26 08:19:02 AM  
Looks like a lot of the political tabbers found this ....thanks a lot fartbongo
 
2013-08-26 08:21:02 AM  
Really Fark People???

No pictures of the news anchor reporting on this story, Casey Montoya.

www2.pictures.gi.zimbio.com
fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net
sphotos-a-ord.xx.fbcdn.net
 
2013-08-26 08:32:28 AM  
This thread got really interesting pretty early.

*jokerpopcorn.gif*

/god I feel so miserable
 
2013-08-26 08:34:36 AM  
Appears the police have themselves an RV
images.wikia.com
 
2013-08-26 08:39:05 AM  

danielscissorhands: Really Fark People???

No pictures of the news anchor reporting on this story, Casey Montoya.


Nice tits
 
2013-08-26 08:39:37 AM  
California police shot and killed Ryan Carnan, 29, on Saturday after he allegedly murdered his mother and fired more shots at random as he cruised the neighborhood on a tractor.

/I don't often go full retard, but when i do, i kill my mom, set the house on fire, steal a tractor, and go on a shooting rampage while cursing the gods and masturbating furiously.

//sorry no photoshop skills.
 
2013-08-26 08:53:15 AM  

The more you eat the more you fart: danielscissorhands: Really Fark People???

No pictures of the news anchor reporting on this story, Casey Montoya.

Nice tits


You may enjoy these...
 
2013-08-26 09:06:31 AM  

some_beer_drinker: violentsalvation: That's not a tank.

of course. just like the police are not an army now. got it.


It's not a tank. It's an armored personnel carrier, 'carrier' being the operative word. It has no weaponry, and it's designed to get the police in safely when some asshole has decided that he want to take everyone he encounters to their grave.

Jesus, they've had these for decades. Un-bunch the panties.
 
2013-08-26 09:08:46 AM  

sendtodave: log_jammin: some_beer_drinker: violentsalvation: That's not a tank.

of course. just like the police are not an army now. got it.

It must be fun to be able to just call something whatever you want it to be, and think that turns it into that thing.

Police wear Kevlar? welp...they're an army.

armored car looks scary? guess that makes it a tank.


army:  a large armed group: a trained or armed fighting force

Sounds like today's cops.

tank: an enclosed heavily armed and armored combat vehicle that moves on tracks

Oh, you got him!  That  enclosed heavily armed and armored combat vehicle doesn't move on tracks!


It's not "armed". Please point to the weapons mounted onto it, or integrated in its design.
 
2013-08-26 09:34:44 AM  

Mikey1969: some_beer_drinker: violentsalvation: That's not a tank.

of course. just like the police are not an army now. got it.

It's not a tank. It's an armored personnel carrier, 'carrier' being the operative word. It has no weaponry, and it's designed to get the police in safely when some asshole has decided that he want to take everyone he encounters to their grave.

Jesus, they've had these for decades. Un-bunch the panties.


As I have learned on Fark, the police are not a subject one should take with a reasoned middle approach. They are government-sponsored mobsters, and even though it would appear that they do have a necessary purpose in serving and protecting the population-- a purpose for which they continuously put their lives on the line-- we shouldn't bother commending them when they do that job because that's what they're farking paid to do. Not to mention, there are those other situations where cops tend to abuse their power and generally act like douchepickles.

So no... We shouldn't commend them for putting their lives on the line and/or a job well done. They used a "tank," which is bad and therefore means that this doesn't count. And if it did count it still wouldn't because police are are always bad. If you hold the position that, while some are bad, some are just honest guys who want to serve and protect the community, then you are wrong. Even the good ones are bad for not instantly turning in their badge the second they discover a bad cop exists within some part of the country. Much like you are either a Jebus-loving free-capitali-whore Republican (as God intended us all to be) or an evil devil-worshiping commu-sociali-Nazi, you cannot be found to hold a middle ground. Either you are a free citizen who recognizes that we must rise up against the tyranny of the never good and always thuggish police, or you are a bootlicking, cop-loving sheep.

Now take your "reason" elsewhere.
 
Displayed 50 of 114 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report