If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Ottawa Citizen)   Reporter goes topless halfway through interview with mayor. It's not news, it's boobies   (ottawacitizen.com) divider line 164
    More: Interesting, Kelowna, GoTopless Day, columnists  
•       •       •

30833 clicks; posted to Main » on 25 Aug 2013 at 12:20 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



164 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2013-08-25 11:15:58 AM
I like this because boobs
 
2013-08-25 11:47:35 AM
too bad they blurred them out...
 
2013-08-25 12:22:06 PM
thesocialmediasurgery.files.wordpress.com
 
2013-08-25 12:22:06 PM
DAMN YOU CENSORS!
 
2013-08-25 12:23:43 PM
Breast. Interview. Ever.
 
2013-08-25 12:23:44 PM
Topless day bie?

/eip
 
2013-08-25 12:23:46 PM
Refresh refresh refresh, c'mon fark boobie pics!
 
2013-08-25 12:24:52 PM
So, Naked News is still around?
 
2013-08-25 12:26:48 PM
...Why the HELL am I not living in Canada?
 
2013-08-25 12:27:21 PM
Just topless?

johnguycollick.com
is unimpressed
 
2013-08-25 12:27:39 PM
Why is it pixelated? DAMN YOU CENSORS!
 
2013-08-25 12:28:05 PM
I would move to Canada TODAY, but the old lady isn't having it.
 
2013-08-25 12:28:11 PM
if it is legal why the blurr????
 
2013-08-25 12:28:31 PM
We are doing Yoga on a bridge yarn covered bridge  in Pittsburgh today. I wonder if some of the women will remember it is go topless day.
 
2013-08-25 12:30:32 PM
Kelowna question sis
 
2013-08-25 12:32:51 PM
i.huffpost.com
 
2013-08-25 12:34:18 PM
bie?
eip

/always worth a shot
 
2013-08-25 12:34:43 PM
Here is the thing.... if women started going topless more often (mostly at appropriate places... as much as these "activists" are trying to be "provocative" and be topless walking down a street in downtown NY.... how many guys really walk around topless down city or neighborhood streets, other than near a beach, ie, a "boardwalk" in NJ or SoCal?)... would that ultimately (would take awhile, 5-10 years of that most likely at least) "desexualize" women's breasts.  That seems to be the mayors argument here... "Women's bare breasts would be a distraction".  And certainly, they would for awhile, but, eventually, wouldn't it become as commonplace as bare chested men (which, doesn't make people "distracted" in general), and become not a distraction?

The question becoming... is this what men are really afraid of?  That it will lose it's "titillation"?  Do men ultimately not want to have it not get them "excited"?  They don't want to lose that part of the heterosexual men's psyche?
 
2013-08-25 12:34:51 PM
Boobies?

/selfilterpwn
 
2013-08-25 12:35:45 PM
Canada, an awesome place.
 
2013-08-25 12:37:54 PM

darth_badger: [i.huffpost.com image 570x760]


YOU TAKE THAT BACK!!! YOU TAKE THAT BACK NAO!!!
 
2013-08-25 12:37:55 PM
She seemed rude and inappropriate.

The Alex Jones of topless interviews.

The mayor seems to have won this one.

/never heard of this guy.
//maybe he deserved this crap.
 
2013-08-25 12:39:46 PM
from the front:

wpmedia.blogs.theprovince.com
 
2013-08-25 12:43:04 PM
Doesn't pixelating the video defeat the purpose of her cause?
 
2013-08-25 12:46:21 PM

HairBolus: from the front:


She looks like a tranny version of Naomi Watts.
 
2013-08-25 12:46:58 PM

WTP 2: if it is legal why the blurr????




She is Japanese.
 
2013-08-25 12:47:03 PM
She looks fat
 
2013-08-25 12:47:36 PM

Metaluna Mutant: So, Naked News is still around?


Yeah you can subscribe for the shows for $10 a month.

I think Drew should be thinking about something.
 
2013-08-25 12:49:03 PM

ThatGuyFromTheInternet: Doesn't pixelating the video defeat the purpose of her cause?



Not if you're the mayor.
 
2013-08-25 12:49:35 PM

dletter: Here is the thing.... if women started going topless more often (mostly at appropriate places... as much as these "activists" are trying to be "provocative" and be topless walking down a street in downtown NY.... how many guys really walk around topless down city or neighborhood streets, other than near a beach, ie, a "boardwalk" in NJ or SoCal?)... would that ultimately (would take awhile, 5-10 years of that most likely at least) "desexualize" women's breasts.  That seems to be the mayors argument here... "Women's bare breasts would be a distraction".  And certainly, they would for awhile, but, eventually, wouldn't it become as commonplace as bare chested men (which, doesn't make people "distracted" in general), and become not a distraction?

The question becoming... is this what men are really afraid of?  That it will lose it's "titillation"?  Do men ultimately not want to have it not get them "excited"?  They don't want to lose that part of the heterosexual men's psyche?


Whatever you say opperessor.
24.media.tumblr.com
 
2013-08-25 12:49:50 PM

styckx: darth_badger: [i.huffpost.com image 570x760]

YOU TAKE THAT BACK!!! YOU TAKE THAT BACK NAO!!!


Nao?
 
2013-08-25 12:51:26 PM
WTP 2
if it is legal why the blurr????


yootoob's ToS?

Otherwise they would have had to pay a few bucks for hosting the publicity stunt themselves.
 
2013-08-25 12:52:42 PM
Fox News: we jiggle, you wiggle

Bringing down Civilization one crass, vulgarian step at a time
since before you were born
 
2013-08-25 12:56:01 PM

dletter: Here is the thing.... if women started going topless more often (mostly at appropriate places... as much as these "activists" are trying to be "provocative" and be topless walking down a street in downtown NY.... how many guys really walk around topless down city or neighborhood streets, other than near a beach, ie, a "boardwalk" in NJ or SoCal?)... would that ultimately (would take awhile, 5-10 years of that most likely at least) "desexualize" women's breasts.  That seems to be the mayors argument here... "Women's bare breasts would be a distraction".  And certainly, they would for awhile, but, eventually, wouldn't it become as commonplace as bare chested men (which, doesn't make people "distracted" in general), and become not a distraction?

The question becoming... is this what men are really afraid of?  That it will lose it's "titillation"?  Do men ultimately not want to have it not get them "excited"?  They don't want to lose that part of the heterosexual men's psyche?


If my enjoyment of breasts is anything like my enjoyment of pizza, then your theory is dead wrong. A constant variety keeps it interesting forever.
 
2013-08-25 12:56:08 PM

dletter: Do men ultimately not want to have it not get them "excited"? They don't want to lose that part of the heterosexual men's psyche?


We'd just focus on something else.  And then a bunch of women would cover that up (barely) and some women would protest.
 
2013-08-25 12:56:39 PM
an ex girlfriend of mine told me...you will not get what you do not ask for.
so, bie/eip

nothing ventured, nothing gained
 
2013-08-25 12:56:39 PM

dletter: Here is the thing.... if women started going topless more often (mostly at appropriate places... as much as these "activists" are trying to be "provocative" and be topless walking down a street in downtown NY.... how many guys really walk around topless down city or neighborhood streets, other than near a beach, ie, a "boardwalk" in NJ or SoCal?)... would that ultimately (would take awhile, 5-10 years of that most likely at least) "desexualize" women's breasts.  That seems to be the mayors argument here... "Women's bare breasts would be a distraction".  And certainly, they would for awhile, but, eventually, wouldn't it become as commonplace as bare chested men (which, doesn't make people "distracted" in general), and become not a distraction?

The question becoming... is this what men are really afraid of?  That it will lose it's "titillation"?  Do men ultimately not want to have it not get them "excited"?  They don't want to lose that part of the heterosexual men's psyche?


I can't speak for all men, but for me, the more live boobies I see the more live boobies I want to see.
/EIP for any BIE that might be available to celebrate Go Topless Day.
 
2013-08-25 12:57:06 PM

from my blood: She seemed rude and inappropriate.

The Alex Jones of topless interviews.

The mayor seems to have won this one.

/never heard of this guy.
//maybe he deserved this crap.


Have to agree with you there. I appreciated the mayor's answers and she got all pushy when he brought up that the reason more females don't walk around bare is a social/cultural issue, not a legal one.
 
2013-08-25 12:57:49 PM
upload.wikimedia.org
He'd approve
 
2013-08-25 12:58:48 PM

StoPPeRmobile: WTP 2: if it is legal why the blurr????

She is Japanese.


i105.photobucket.com
 
2013-08-25 12:59:09 PM

lazymojo: styckx: darth_badger: [i.huffpost.com image 570x760]

YOU TAKE THAT BACK!!! YOU TAKE THAT BACK NAO!!!

Nao?


People misspell things on the interloops because they find it funny or think others will find it funny.
/true story
 
2013-08-25 12:59:23 PM
That's a man, Baby!
 
2013-08-25 01:01:33 PM
1) Maximum AW'ing.

2) She's got huge tracts of land.

/Holy pop up hell.
 
2013-08-25 01:02:20 PM

MarkEC: I can't speak for all men, but for me, the more live boobies I see the more live boobies I want to see.
/EIP for any BIE that might be available to celebrate Go Topless Day.


I can second this.
 
2013-08-25 01:02:28 PM
That's right, girls - keep protesting; get angry! Show us how fed up you are!
 
2013-08-25 01:03:44 PM

dletter: how many guys really walk around topless down city or neighborhood streets, other than near a beach, ie, a "boardwalk" in NJ or SoCal?)...


You know how I can tell you haven't driven through the St. Thomas Projects in New Orleans in the summer?

/the boys wear pants, but only below the hips
 
2013-08-25 01:04:38 PM
farked? Alternate link?
 
2013-08-25 01:05:20 PM
Didn't we have this thread just the other day?  Also, link is busted.  And finally, somebody do this to drunken Rob Ford, just for the lulz.
 
2013-08-25 01:07:11 PM

HairBolus: from the front:

[wpmedia.blogs.theprovince.com image 686x697]


Yeah.......good thing she has the cans whether they are real or not. That face is rough on the eyes.
 
2013-08-25 01:07:33 PM
If its legal, then do it if you want. Yay!
 
2013-08-25 01:10:00 PM
EIP for any BIE that might be available to celebrate

I am going down to the near by park to show my support!
 
2013-08-25 01:16:59 PM
Raelians!
 
2013-08-25 01:18:40 PM
oh look, the people you don't want to see topless are the people who want you to see them topless.  Who knew?
 
2013-08-25 01:19:17 PM
Damitalltohell,
l.yimg.com
 
2013-08-25 01:19:22 PM
Deserved the Ironic tag for the Censoring.
 
2013-08-25 01:19:49 PM
Bob Filner is just beating himself for not running for mayor in Kelowna.
 
2013-08-25 01:24:28 PM
Kelowna?

Dammit, I leave town for less than a week, and something interesting happens.

/all goddamn summer, no boobies
//Justin Trudeau popped by, but I don't care to see his boobies
 
2013-08-25 01:26:00 PM

dletter: (would take awhile, 5-10 years of that most likely at least)


tl;dnr
 
2013-08-25 01:26:55 PM
"Jane, you ignorant slut."

// lawn
// off
 
2013-08-25 01:30:24 PM
/soapbox

A woman attending to her business is not sexy, topless or not. The sexy is in her presentation. Her boobs alone are not distracting, except in a 'not normally seen' kind of way. I believe in equality in all things for all people, male or female; black or white; civilian or cop; politico or citizen. It's inconceivable that this is an issue today. Women were born with the inalienable right to nakedness and there should be no laws to circumvent it. Only she can determine to appropriateness of clothing herself.
//end soapbox

/oh, and BIE?
//eip
 
2013-08-25 01:30:59 PM

Oh_Enough_Already: Women: "We demand the right to go topless just like men do!"

Society: "Uh, okay."

Women 5 minutes later: "ZOMG! All these pervs are looking at my boobs! Somebody do something!"


In addition to that we'll also get "ZOMG! Put a shirt on! Holy fark I'm blind! I never want to see another set of titties again!" after the few women that are willing to do this turn out to be the ones we don't want to run around topless. Ever been to a nude beach? It's not the beautiful people that like to run around naked in public.
 
2013-08-25 01:31:10 PM

Larva Lump: "Jane, you ignorant slut."

// lawn
// off


That's my line....

static.neatoshop.com
 
2013-08-25 01:32:43 PM

dletter: Here is the thing.... if women started going topless more often (mostly at appropriate places... as much as these "activists" are trying to be "provocative" and be topless walking down a street in downtown NY.... how many guys really walk around topless down city or neighborhood streets, other than near a beach, ie, a "boardwalk" in NJ or SoCal?)... would that ultimately (would take awhile, 5-10 years of that most likely at least) "desexualize" women's breasts.  That seems to be the mayors argument here... "Women's bare breasts would be a distraction".  And certainly, they would for awhile, but, eventually, wouldn't it become as commonplace as bare chested men (which, doesn't make people "distracted" in general), and become not a distraction?

The question becoming... is this what men are really afraid of?  That it will lose it's "titillation"?  Do men ultimately not want to have it not get them "excited"?  They don't want to lose that part of the heterosexual men's psyche?


Yes, it's true that we would lose some of the titillation (ugh), but humans presumably managed to get aroused and have sex for thousands of years before they had clothing, so I think we'd be OK.
 
2013-08-25 01:41:24 PM

Oh_Enough_Already: Women: "We demand the right to go topless just like men do!"

Society: "Uh, okay."

Women 5 minutes later: "ZOMG! All these pervs are looking at my boobs! Somebody do something!"


If people are staring at their chests, they're still not being treated just like men.
 
2013-08-25 01:43:04 PM

Dingleberry Dickwad: In addition to that we'll also get "ZOMG! Put a shirt on! Holy fark I'm blind! I never want to see another set of titties again!" after the few women that are willing to do this turn out to be the ones we don't want to run around topless. Ever been to a nude beach? It's not the beautiful people that like to run around naked in public.


I've been to beaches that cater to Euro expats, not in the CONUS. Plenty of hot nekkid women running around them places.
 
2013-08-25 01:43:20 PM

AtlanticCoast63: ...Why the HELL am I not living in Canada?


Toplessness is legal in NY state, including NYC, as well.

Among other places in the US.

HTH.

The question is if the Boobies is the Boobies or is it boobies?
 
2013-08-25 01:48:30 PM
It's not news unless the mayor is naked (NSFW).

/and EIP in case this does turn into a BIE thread
 
2013-08-25 01:53:08 PM

sendtodave: Oh_Enough_Already: Women: "We demand the right to go topless just like men do!"

Society: "Uh, okay."

Women 5 minutes later: "ZOMG! All these pervs are looking at my boobs! Somebody do something!"

If people are staring at their chests, they're still not being treated just like men.


Go to a beach and watch the women's eyes. They look at the hard-bodied male chests with just as much frequency, they are just better at not being obvious.
 
2013-08-25 02:00:06 PM

Ivo Shandor: It's not news unless the mayor is naked (NSFW).

/and EIP in case this does turn into a BIE thread


I'd give her my election.
 
2013-08-25 02:01:02 PM

ThatGuyFromTheInternet: Doesn't pixelating the video defeat the purpose of her cause?


It wasn't pixelated.

It's just terrible plastic surgery.
 
2013-08-25 02:03:09 PM

MarkEC: sendtodave: Oh_Enough_Already: Women: "We demand the right to go topless just like men do!"

Society: "Uh, okay."

Women 5 minutes later: "ZOMG! All these pervs are looking at my boobs! Somebody do something!"

If people are staring at their chests, they're still not being treated just like men.

Go to a beach and watch the women's eyes. They look at the hard-bodied male chests with just as much frequency, they are just better at not being obvious.


I was told that women don't care much about a guy's looks.

Was that all a horrible lie?
 
2013-08-25 02:03:53 PM

Piizzadude: I am going down to the near by park to show my support!


wildomarmagazine.files.wordpress.com

/ ewwwww
 
2013-08-25 02:05:04 PM

bubo_sibiricus: AtlanticCoast63: ...Why the HELL am I not living in Canada?

Toplessness is legal in NY state, including NYC, as well.

Among other places in the US.

HTH.

The question is if the Boobies is the Boobies or is it boobies?


All really great cities
 
2013-08-25 02:08:51 PM

sendtodave: MarkEC: sendtodave: Oh_Enough_Already: Women: "We demand the right to go topless just like men do!"

Society: "Uh, okay."

Women 5 minutes later: "ZOMG! All these pervs are looking at my boobs! Somebody do something!"

If people are staring at their chests, they're still not being treated just like men.

Go to a beach and watch the women's eyes. They look at the hard-bodied male chests with just as much frequency, they are just better at not being obvious.

I was told that women don't care much about a guy's looks.

Was that all a horrible lie?


Yes, it certainly was.
They not only check out guys chests, but also their asses and their "packages". They are better and quicker at retaining what they see, so they can be more covert at it.
 
2013-08-25 02:10:44 PM

The My Little Pony Killer: Just topless?

[johnguycollick.com image 600x400]
is unimpressed


Came here for this. Thank you, good sir.
 
2013-08-25 02:12:13 PM
This is definitely relevant to my interests and this is in NOOO way a bookmark

/EIP just in case of some rocking BIE.
 
2013-08-25 02:14:32 PM

ThatGuyFromTheInternet: Ivo Shandor: It's not news unless the mayor is naked (NSFW).

/and EIP in case this does turn into a BIE thread

I'd give her my election.


I'd let her pull my lever.

/BIE is a lie
 
2013-08-25 02:27:18 PM

OtherLittleGuy: ThatGuyFromTheInternet: Ivo Shandor: It's not news unless the mayor is naked (NSFW).

/and EIP in case this does turn into a BIE thread

I'd give her my election.

I'd let her pull my lever.

/BIE is a lie


My Chad is hanging, if you know what I mean, and I think you do.
 
2013-08-25 02:30:22 PM
Because a true "journalist" wants to become the story, not report the story.

What a pathetic attention whore.

Seriously, with all the terrible things that are happening in the world, a few people are getting all wound up about whether or not some fat chicks can make fools out of themselves in public? The mayor even told her it was legal, but she still had to "shock" him. We are in trouble as a world and I hope she gets fired, just like I would hope a male reporter would be fired if he took his shirt off during an interview.
 
2013-08-25 02:35:07 PM

dletter: Here is the thing.... if women started going topless more often (mostly at appropriate places... as much as these "activists" are trying to be "provocative" and be topless walking down a street in downtown NY.... how many guys really walk around topless down city or neighborhood streets, other than near a beach, ie, a "boardwalk" in NJ or SoCal?)... would that ultimately (would take awhile, 5-10 years of that most likely at least) "desexualize" women's breasts.  That seems to be the mayors argument here... "Women's bare breasts would be a distraction".  And certainly, they would for awhile, but, eventually, wouldn't it become as commonplace as bare chested men (which, doesn't make people "distracted" in general), and become not a distraction?

The question becoming... is this what men are really afraid of?  That it will lose it's "titillation"?  Do men ultimately not want to have it not get them "excited"?  They don't want to lose that part of the heterosexual men's psyche?


Go back to Human Sexuality 101.  Males are hard-wired to be sexually aroused by the display of certain parts of the female anatomy, breasts being one.  Females, OTOH, are hard-wired to need an emotional component in order to be aroused.  That's why male toplessness is inherently different from the female version.  Yes, males will have to learn to control themselves even more, but don't think for a moment that it won't be a struggle for men.
 
2013-08-25 02:35:44 PM
Attractive women age 18-45 may take note that I can make myself available to be interviewed almost any day of the year, in public or private, about any subject whatsoever. And you don't have to be topless: you can go bottomless instead, or even completely nude.

The Farkette who sent me a BIE Valentine is especially welcome. With the right approach I might tell you anything you want to know.
 
2013-08-25 02:39:55 PM
By the way, in the interest of fairness, I have a topless photo of myself to send anyone who asks. Just make sure you have a quart or so of eye bleach on hand, mkay?
 
2013-08-25 02:40:09 PM
acohn: Go back to Human Sexuality 101.  Males are hard-wired to be sexually aroused by the display of certain parts of the female anatomy, breasts being one.  Females, OTOH, are hard-wired to need an emotional component in order to be aroused.  That's why male toplessness is inherently different from the female version.  Yes, males will have to learn to control themselves even more, but don't think for a moment that it won't be a struggle for men.

Do you always paint with so broad a brush?
 
2013-08-25 02:40:36 PM
If you're an interviewer who is doing your best to upstage the interviewee, you might not be a real interviewer.
 
2013-08-25 02:46:03 PM

MarkEC: sendtodave: Oh_Enough_Already: Women: "We demand the right to go topless just like men do!"

Society: "Uh, okay."

Women 5 minutes later: "ZOMG! All these pervs are looking at my boobs! Somebody do something!"

If people are staring at their chests, they're still not being treated just like men.

Go to a beach and watch the women's eyes. They look at the hard-bodied male chests with just as much frequency, they are just better at not being obvious.


They intentionally hide their body language, too. Don't want to give away that they're turned on, when the guy might look hawt but turn out to be a psychopathic manchild.

/if the guy was their true soulmate, they would be able to tell that she likes him even if she's angrily denying it and throwing out obvious signals she isn't interested
//substitute the equivalent "have psychic superpowers" for "be their one true soulmate," and you can see why the dating scene is so messed up
///and it doesn't help that it's ridiculously easy to take advantage of this as a guy, if you're willing to play the "psychic powers" con game to control the poor girl's emotional state and make her think the way you want her to, then seem like a "true soulmate" when you repeat to her the ideas you implanted
 
2013-08-25 02:46:43 PM

Dreamless: Do you always paint with so broad a brush?


But he's correct.

How the fark did you ever exist without the sex drive of your parents?

You are now thinking about your parents having sex.  You're welcome.
 
2013-08-25 02:47:28 PM
What?  Why hasn't this come up yet?

www.capitalnewyork.com
 
2013-08-25 02:48:06 PM
Obviously, the best and most traditional way of spreading this holiday cheer is BIE.  Please, freely celebrate this topless holiday season.

/EIP
//EIP
///EIP
 
2013-08-25 02:55:27 PM

dletter: Here is the thing.... if women started going topless more often (mostly at appropriate places... as much as these "activists" are trying to be "provocative" and be topless walking down a street in downtown NY.... how many guys really walk around topless down city or neighborhood streets, other than near a beach, ie, a "boardwalk" in NJ or SoCal?)... would that ultimately (would take awhile, 5-10 years of that most likely at least) "desexualize" women's breasts.  That seems to be the mayors argument here... "Women's bare breasts would be a distraction".  And certainly, they would for awhile, but, eventually, wouldn't it become as commonplace as bare chested men (which, doesn't make people "distracted" in general), and become not a distraction?

The question becoming... is this what men are really afraid of?  That it will lose it's "titillation"?  Do men ultimately not want to have it not get them "excited"?  They don't want to lose that part of the heterosexual men's psyche?


Is there any actual evidence to suggest that *men* are against women being topless?

In my experience, *women* are many times more observant and many times more critical of other women appearance than men are.  Maybe it's been too many years, but back when I was in college, if a girl dressed 'like a slut' at a party, all she'd get is positive attention from men....but it was always other girls who would comment on them.

If you look at the people signing the petition supporting women going topless (http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/womens-consitutional-right-to-go-to pl ess/ ) - at a quick glance, it appears to be more men than women.
 
2013-08-25 02:55:28 PM

cig-mkr: Damitalltohell,
[l.yimg.com image 631x342]


Gross!

i105.photobucket.com
There, that's better.
 
2013-08-25 03:01:24 PM
Oh, and BIE

/EIP
 
2013-08-25 03:02:47 PM
Looking increasingly unlikely, but EIP in case the BIE flow
 
2013-08-25 03:04:56 PM
To not understand why it would be inappropriate even if not illegal is to be purposely obtuse or mentally retarded.
 
2013-08-25 03:10:36 PM

Mikeyworld: /soapbox

A woman attending to her business is not sexy, topless or not. The sexy is in her presentation. Her boobs alone are not distracting, except in a 'not normally seen' kind of way. I believe in equality in all things for all people, male or female; black or white; civilian or cop; politico or citizen. It's inconceivable that this is an issue today. Women were born with the inalienable right to nakedness and there should be no laws to circumvent it. Only she can determine to appropriateness of clothing herself.
//end soapbox

/oh, and BIE?
//eip


Is this like "good naked, bad naked"?
 
2013-08-25 03:11:11 PM

shtychkn: To not understand why it would be inappropriate even if not illegal is to be purposely obtuse or mentally retarded.


Bingo.

But hey, if we're redefining toplessness as business casual, then my ironing time/dry cleaning bill is going to shrink exponentially.
 
2013-08-25 03:14:13 PM

FloydA: cig-mkr: Damitalltohell,
[l.yimg.com image 631x342]

Gross!

[i105.photobucket.com image 631x342]
There, that's better.


Don't forget to pixelate the reflection on the table too.
 
2013-08-25 03:19:31 PM
i0.kym-cdn.com
oh, and EIP for any of you generous and beautiful women willing to send BIE.
 
2013-08-25 03:21:21 PM

jaytkay: Piizzadude: I am going down to the near by park to show my support!

[wildomarmagazine.files.wordpress.com image 400x338]

/ ewwwww


Yeah but at least it is better than this and this is acceptable in public (NSFW or EYES)

http://themockdock.com/2009/07/06/exhibit-429-women-who-should-not-w ea r-thongs/
 
2013-08-25 03:24:14 PM
Her boobs got pixelated but not the reflection in the table.

// To all Farkettes (North America or otherwise): Feel free to participate in Go Topless Day with BIE.
 
2013-08-25 03:24:19 PM

Piizzadude: jaytkay: Piizzadude: I am going down to the near by park to show my support!

[wildomarmagazine.files.wordpress.com image 400x338]

/ ewwwww

Yeah but at least it is better than this and this is acceptable in public (NSFW or EYES)

http://themockdock.com/2009/07/06/exhibit-429-women-who-should-not-w ea r-thongs/


WHy when I google "women who shouldnt wear thongs" is John Wayne Gacy in a clown suit the second image? Goolgrola fail
 
2013-08-25 03:24:39 PM
filner is begging, BEGGING for an interview
 
2013-08-25 03:40:23 PM
Is BIE at lie?

/EIP
 
2013-08-25 03:42:04 PM

Dreamless: acohn: Go back to Human Sexuality 101.  Males are hard-wired to be sexually aroused by the display of certain parts of the female anatomy, breasts being one.  Females, OTOH, are hard-wired to need an emotional component in order to be aroused.  That's why male toplessness is inherently different from the female version.  Yes, males will have to learn to control themselves even more, but don't think for a moment that it won't be a struggle for men.

Do you always paint with so broad a brush?


Of course!  Life is much easier that way.
 
2013-08-25 03:42:21 PM
Why did no one tell me it was Topless Day?

Well, as always, EIP.
 
2013-08-25 03:43:41 PM
That was funny, and a little dumb.
It should have been done in public.

But if the issue is about a restaurant, no shirt, no shoes, no service.
It's getting to the point that public establishments need to have a sign and paper handouts indicating the rules of the facility.

img812.imageshack.us
 
2013-08-25 03:43:51 PM
I'm heading to Kelowna/Penticton in a coupla weeks.  I should perhaps report on whatever boobies I find there....

Also, the person doing the interview is a friend of a friend of mine in Kelowna...
 
2013-08-25 03:45:19 PM

sendtodave: MarkEC: sendtodave: Oh_Enough_Already: Women: "We demand the right to go topless just like men do!"

Society: "Uh, okay."

Women 5 minutes later: "ZOMG! All these pervs are looking at my boobs! Somebody do something!"

If people are staring at their chests, they're still not being treated just like men.

Go to a beach and watch the women's eyes. They look at the hard-bodied male chests with just as much frequency, they are just better at not being obvious.

I was told that women don't care much about a guy's looks.

Was that all a horrible lie?


Boy - that's a no-win argument. If it's not a horrible lie, then you can't compare men staring at women's chests with women not doing the same. If is a horrible lie, then women are just as guilty. I don't understand this argument that women are being sexually objectified because men pay attention to them for the things they find sexually attractive, but women aren't objectifying men because of whatever they pay attention to. When did sexual attraction to the things you're sexually attracted to become a crime? If a woman laughs at my jokes is she sexually objectifying my sense of humor? Geez I'm glad I'm not in the dating pool anymore.
 
2013-08-25 03:45:37 PM

cig-mkr: Damitalltohell,
[l.yimg.com image 631x342]


They should have blurred her from the neck up.
 
2013-08-25 03:45:42 PM
What, no link to uncensored video? FARK, I am disappoint.

/continues googling topless interview kelowna
 
2013-08-25 03:50:59 PM

Stoker: That was funny, and a little dumb.
It should have been done in public.

But if the issue is about a restaurant, no shirt, no shoes, no service.
It's getting to the point that public establishments need to have a sign and paper handouts indicating the rules of the facility.
-=-

I left out a word, added a border.
I was compelled to fix it before anyone noticed.

img694.imageshack.us
 
2013-08-25 03:51:42 PM

bubo_sibiricus: Dreamless: Do you always paint with so broad a brush?

But he's correct.

How the fark did you ever exist without the sex drive of your parents?

You are now thinking about your parents having sex.  You're welcome.


I don't think I was claiming anywhere that my parents didn't have a sex drive.  I was arguing against the complete lack of nuance and respect for human variation in the statement.

/Yes, I did take socially of human sexuality in undergrad.
 
2013-08-25 03:52:20 PM
*sociology
 
2013-08-25 03:59:13 PM

Stoker: Stoker: That was funny, and a little dumb.
It should have been done in public.

But if the issue is about a restaurant, no shirt, no shoes, no service.
It's getting to the point that public establishments need to have a sign and paper handouts indicating the rules of the facility.
-=-
I left out a word, added a border.
I was compelled to fix it before anyone noticed.

[img694.imageshack.us image 370x498]


Also need to correct "your feet has fungus" before someone notices.
 
2013-08-25 04:01:47 PM
Came here for boobies
Leaving disappointed

( º Y º )
 
2013-08-25 04:25:14 PM
99 zettabytes of nudity on the Internet, still disappointed these boobies are blurred out.
 
2013-08-25 04:25:17 PM
Her whole body should be blurred out
 
2013-08-25 04:44:56 PM

cig-mkr: Damitalltohell,
[l.yimg.com image 631x342]


Meh, eh?
/Canadian pretty
//Why can't they all look like Mia Kirshner?
 
2013-08-25 04:48:50 PM
imageshack.com Bob Filner Approves
 
2013-08-25 05:16:22 PM
I'd ask for BIE, but I'm blind. Instead, I'm going to need all the ladies to come by my home so I can experience it by braille. Of course I have EIP for arranging the logistics.

Also, it's a shame they blurred it - it looks like the reporter might have a nice pair. I mean... uh... someone told me. I couldn't see it. On account of how I'm blind. Yeah, that's the ticket.
 
2013-08-25 05:25:27 PM

Bin_jammin: They should have blurred her from the neck up.


Nope. She's quite attractive. The picture that was linked above might have been the worst picture I saw in the GIS I did, and it's still not bad.

It never ceases to amaze me that people can miss the point so completely. By pixellating her they give lie to her right to go topless even as she does it.
 
2013-08-25 05:45:47 PM
Is this where we ask for BIE?
EIP
 
2013-08-25 06:14:46 PM

ArcadianRefugee: Stoker: Stoker: That was funny, and a little dumb.
It should have been done in public.

But if the issue is about a restaurant, no shirt, no shoes, no service.
It's getting to the point that public establishments need to have a sign and paper handouts indicating the rules of the facility.
-=-
I left out a word, added a border.
I was compelled to fix it before anyone noticed.

[img694.imageshack.us image 370x498]

Also need to correct "your feet has fungus" before someone notices.


And also "Keep your children properly". Properly what? Behaved? Muzzled? Duct-taped to posts outside the restaurant?
 
2013-08-25 06:50:01 PM

cig-mkr: Damitalltohell,
[l.yimg.com image 631x342]


Enhance...
Enhance...
i1.ytimg.com

...enhance...
 
2013-08-25 06:59:30 PM
You people suck.

amog.com
 
2013-08-25 07:00:21 PM
24.media.tumblr.com
 
2013-08-25 07:01:25 PM
jamiie-x.webs.com
 
2013-08-25 07:02:56 PM
24.media.tumblr.com
www.opposingviews.com
 
2013-08-25 07:03:45 PM
lh5.googleusercontent.com
 
2013-08-25 07:05:49 PM
naughtyteenniki.com
 
2013-08-25 07:07:35 PM
www.sexta-feira.net
 
2013-08-25 07:14:32 PM
marksuknanan.com
 
2013-08-25 07:15:19 PM
mysecond-life.com
 
2013-08-25 07:16:01 PM
24.media.tumblr.com
 
2013-08-25 07:16:45 PM
olivierchiappone.files.wordpress.com
 
2013-08-25 07:18:17 PM
74.53.26.139
 
2013-08-25 07:19:29 PM
24.media.tumblr.com
 
2013-08-25 07:34:42 PM
Can someone fill me in on what BIE and EIP stand for?
 
2013-08-25 07:42:20 PM

DOCTORD000M: Can someone fill me in on what BIE and EIP stand for?


http://fark.wikia.com/wiki/BIE
 
2013-08-25 08:19:47 PM
Did anyone notice that she's not hot?
 
2013-08-25 09:00:01 PM
This thread got a boost omnibus. Kudos


Bah bah bah B-I-E in the E-I-P.
 
2013-08-25 09:01:52 PM
well that was completely worthless
 
2013-08-25 09:03:02 PM
I, for one, would like to get out in front of this movement and show my stiff support for the cause.
 
2013-08-25 09:55:06 PM
Hell, I'd like BIE in my EIP.

Does it even work anymore with GD not attending?
 
2013-08-25 10:23:26 PM

EdgeRunner: ArcadianRefugee: Stoker: Stoker: That was funny, and a little dumb.
It should have been done in public.

But if the issue is about a restaurant, no shirt, no shoes, no service.
It's getting to the point that public establishments need to have a sign and paper handouts indicating the rules of the facility.
-=-
I left out a word, added a border.
I was compelled to fix it before anyone noticed.

[img694.imageshack.us image 370x498]

Also need to correct "your feet has fungus" before someone notices.

And also "Keep your children properly". Properly what? Behaved? Muzzled? Duct-taped to posts outside the restaurant?


The simple truth is that the grammar is atrocious throughout the entire thing. If you're gonna use this at an actual restaurant, get an editor, m'man. Also, pre-emptively telling me to keep my attitude in check is gonna accomplish the exact opposite. That shiat's rude, yo.
 
2013-08-25 10:34:08 PM
Protestor, not reporter. Certainly not "journalist". Just a personal rant. That being said, I am all for boobs.
 
2013-08-25 10:40:28 PM
article is all pixelated.

-1
 
2013-08-25 11:15:06 PM

vudutek: DOCTORD000M: Can someone fill me in on what BIE and EIP stand for?

http://fark.wikia.com/wiki/BIE


My god... I've been using the internets all wrong.
 
2013-08-25 11:53:07 PM

D_S_W: Hell, I'd like BIE in my EIP.

Does it even work anymore with GD not attending?


her absence is a good thing.
 
2013-08-26 12:19:10 AM
I so whole heartedly support loose boobies.
i.imgur.com
 
2013-08-26 01:12:34 AM

Girion47: D_S_W: Hell, I'd like BIE in my EIP.

Does it even work anymore with GD not attending?

her absence is a good thing.


Kind of a polarizing subject. I happen to be pro-GD because to me there was the same type of vibe as the article. Free-spirit and expression.
 
2013-08-26 05:22:52 AM

Girion47: D_S_W: Hell, I'd like BIE in my EIP.

Does it even work anymore with GD not attending?

her absence is a good thing.


2.bp.blogspot.com
 
2013-08-26 08:03:42 AM

wallywam1: Girion47: D_S_W: Hell, I'd like BIE in my EIP.

Does it even work anymore with GD not attending?

her absence is a good thing.

Kind of a polarizing subject. I happen to be pro-GD because to me there was the same type of vibe as the article. Free-spirit and expression.


and the whole scamming people for money to buy her husband camera equipment.
 
2013-08-26 08:25:16 AM
God damn censors.  Now I have to use my imagination.

oi42.tinypic.com

/fist, god, etc.
 
2013-08-26 09:28:29 AM
Show up at one with a camera and then post the pics on the web.

Win/Win
 
2013-08-26 10:29:22 AM
Just the way I like my women , topless and desperate!
 
2013-08-26 11:10:56 AM

TheRealist II: Just the way I like my women , topless and desperate!


And paid for by someone else?
 
2013-08-26 12:55:13 PM
Moving to Kelowna at the end of the week, so I'm getting a...uh...kick
 
2013-08-26 02:46:15 PM
Dude, you're not helping. The idea is to make it seem normal.

img28.imageshack.us
 
2013-08-26 03:00:37 PM

acohn: Females, OTOH, are hard-wired to need an emotional component in order to be aroused.


Please provide  peer-reviewed data to back this statement up.
 
2013-08-26 03:15:54 PM

boyvoyeur: Dude, you're not helping. The idea is to make it seem normal.

[621x319 from http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/3194/9gg9.jpg image 621x319]


I see nipple.   Enjoy the banhammer.
 
2013-08-26 03:28:57 PM
EdgeRunner:
And also "Keep your children properly". Properly what? Behaved? Muzzled? Duct-taped to posts outside the restaurant?
-=-
You're right. It's a note for the incredibly stupid, I'll dumb it down.
Cletus might just run out to the truck for the tape.

How's this? (Ah so late in the time.)

img4.imageshack.us
 
2013-08-26 04:44:54 PM

Girion47: boyvoyeur: Dude, you're not helping. The idea is to make it seem normal.

[621x319 from http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/3194/9gg9.jpg image 621x319]

I see nipple.   Enjoy the banhammer.


Way to point it out
 
2013-08-26 04:50:53 PM

cig-mkr: Damitalltohell,
[l.yimg.com image 631x342]

I'd do that........in a heart beat.
 
2013-08-26 09:06:30 PM

omnibus_necanda_sunt: [mysecond-life.com image 600x800]


i289.photobucket.com
 
Displayed 164 of 164 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report