Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Deadline)   The Butler serves up another box office win, and We're the Millers finishes at #2. Newcomers The Mortal Instruments is #3, the hilarious bar apocalypse comedy The World's End bellies up to #5, and dismal torture porn You're Next thuds at #6   (deadline.com ) divider line
    More: Followup, The Mortal Instruments, torture porn, alternate ending, Lily Collins, comic science fiction, Nick Frost, lee daniels, Cate Blanchett  
•       •       •

878 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 25 Aug 2013 at 1:33 PM (2 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



68 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2013-08-25 12:49:03 PM  
I'm probably in the minority, but I felt The World's End wasn't quite as hilarious as its predecessors. I can't quite put my finger on it, but the usual chemistry between Pegg and Frost seemed....absent. Perhaps a second viewing is in order.
 
2013-08-25 01:05:40 PM  
The World's End wasn't expected to make tons of cash here in the U.S.  The other two films didn't make much here either.  It's across the pond where they make a tidy profit.
 
2013-08-25 01:20:37 PM  
You're Next was not dismal nor torture porn.
 
2013-08-25 01:34:42 PM  
I like how idiots think every new horror movie is "torture porn" now.
 
2013-08-25 01:41:02 PM  

Apos: I'm probably in the minority, but I felt The World's End wasn't quite as hilarious as its predecessors. I can't quite put my finger on it, but the usual chemistry between Pegg and Frost seemed....absent. Perhaps a second viewing is in order.


I found the other two improved upon rewatching.  I haven't seen The World's End yet but I suspect it will be the same way.
 
2013-08-25 01:41:31 PM  

Apos: I'm probably in the minority, but I felt The World's End wasn't quite as hilarious as its predecessors. I can't quite put my finger on it, but the usual chemistry between Pegg and Frost seemed....absent. Perhaps a second viewing is in order.


I think it was the weakest out of the three but that's like saying Andy Summers is the weakest member of the Police
 
2013-08-25 01:42:11 PM  
No one has bothered to point out that subby screwed up the headline yet?  Ok.   Subby screwed up the headline.  TWE came in 4.  Planes was 5.
 
2013-08-25 01:44:11 PM  

Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: I like how idiots think every new horror movie is "torture porn" now.


No shiat.
 
2013-08-25 01:54:33 PM  
"Shaun of the Dead" and "Hot Fuzz" were both pretty mediocre. If "World's End" is even worse, then it must suck pretty bad.

They're movies that are made for internet dorks, basically. They aren't very clever, but they hit all the right notes for people that think *they* are clever.
 
2013-08-25 02:01:49 PM  

robsul82: You're Next was not dismal nor torture porn.


Seriously.  It's a scary and at times quite funny home invasion movie that is by no means an Eli Roth flick.  Also, that damn song is still stuck in my head.
 
2013-08-25 02:11:07 PM  
The fact the The Butler is number one on any list indicates just how pathetic our society has become.
 
2013-08-25 02:13:16 PM  
You're Next kicked ass. It was like Kill Bill meets Home Alone.
 
2013-08-25 02:21:59 PM  
Hey, Subby, fark you. Seriously, go fark yourself right in your stupid ear. You're Next was about as much "torture porn" (one of the most overused terms by people who have no idea what they're talking about) as Planes was, not to mention being far from dismal. The fact that it only hit #6 should be a cause of shame for the moviegoing public.

/Seriously wondering if Subby even saw it.
//Doubt it.
 
2013-08-25 02:23:33 PM  

enik: The fact the The Butler is number one on any list indicates just how pathetic our society has become.


Eh...It wasn't a bad movie. Told an interesting story but was very slow paced and overly long.
 
2013-08-25 02:34:38 PM  

enik: The fact the The Butler is number one on any list indicates just how pathetic our society has become.


So I'm guessing you didn't really embrace the Civil Rights events of the weekend. Got it.
 
2013-08-25 02:37:53 PM  

realmolo: "Shaun of the Dead" and "Hot Fuzz" were both pretty mediocre. If "World's End" is even worse, then it must suck pretty bad.

They're movies that are made for internet dorks, basically. They aren't very clever, but they hit all the right notes for people that think *they* are clever.


Trololo

Don't you have any better way to kill time?
 
2013-08-25 02:39:03 PM  
The worlds end was pretty great. That is all.
 
2013-08-25 02:43:38 PM  
You're Next is the best horror flick since Cabin in the Woods. As for comedy, We're the Miller's is way better than The World's End.
 
2013-08-25 02:46:30 PM  
Possible spoilers for worlds end but not really:

Until bar #3 it was just too slow, too much of pegg's character, just not that good. After that its on par with HF which is meant as a high compliment. Everything after they left town was just way too weird IMO.

Liked it a good amount, but just a little slow and weird. Sure rewatches will help a little.
 
2013-08-25 02:49:01 PM  
Also kind of sad doomsday by Nero didn't make it into the movie. Worked perfectly in the commercials.

/I FARKING HATE THIS TOWN
 
2013-08-25 02:50:08 PM  
The words "you're next" just make me think of
static.tvtropes.org
 
2013-08-25 02:53:03 PM  
The Butler is based on the life of Eugene Allen. I know it's based on a article about him. My question is how a good of butler if he told a reporter anything? I would think not talking about what happens there.
 
2013-08-25 02:56:13 PM  

JasonOfOrillia: Apos: I'm probably in the minority, but I felt The World's End wasn't quite as hilarious as its predecessors. I can't quite put my finger on it, but the usual chemistry between Pegg and Frost seemed....absent. Perhaps a second viewing is in order.

I found the other two improved upon rewatching.  I haven't seen The World's End yet but I suspect it will be the same way.


You're probably right.

The Incredible Sexual Egg: Apos: I'm probably in the minority, but I felt The World's End wasn't quite as hilarious as its predecessors. I can't quite put my finger on it, but the usual chemistry between Pegg and Frost seemed....absent. Perhaps a second viewing is in order.

I think it was the weakest out of the three but that's like saying Andy Summers is the weakest member of the Police



Heh.....Good analogy.
 
2013-08-25 02:58:30 PM  

Mid_mo_mad_man: The Butler is based on the life of Eugene Allen. I know it's based on a article about him. My question is how a good of butler if he told a reporter anything? I would think not talking about what happens there would be required as he might here sensitive info

 
2013-08-25 03:07:56 PM  

Jizz Master Zero: Hey, Subby, fark you. Seriously, go fark yourself right in your stupid ear. You're Next was about as much "torture porn" (one of the most overused terms by people who have no idea what they're talking about) as Planes was, not to mention being far from dismal. The fact that it only hit #6 should be a cause of shame for the moviegoing public.

/Seriously wondering if Subby even saw it.
//Doubt it.


You're talking to the Deadline Hollywood subby, who regularly fails at math, reading comprehension, humor, and life.
 
2013-08-25 03:17:13 PM  
You're Next was made for under $1 million, and it raked in over $7 million in it's first two days of release.  That's not "thudding" by any standard.
 
2013-08-25 03:19:12 PM  
Twilight 2.0 is only in 3rd
 
2013-08-25 03:24:48 PM  
We're The Millers was hilarious.
 
2013-08-25 03:27:24 PM  
On topic question: The mom and pop theater by me put up a notice on their website that they were pulling all screenings of You're Next, with no further explanation. My assumption is they got some complaints for some reason. Anyone who's seen the movie have any insight? Is it any more offensive than the average horror flick, or is it just this particular theater being weird?

/It is sort of a weird theater
// Still gonna wait for PPV
 
2013-08-25 03:30:59 PM  

thamike: You're Next was made for under $1 million, and it raked in over $7 million in it's first two days of release.  That's not "thudding" by any standard.


Well, except for the axe and hammer sounds.

bugmn99: On topic question: The mom and pop theater by me put up a notice on their website that they were pulling all screenings of You're Next, with no further explanation. My assumption is they got some complaints for some reason. Anyone who's seen the movie have any insight? Is it any more offensive than the average horror flick, or is it just this particular theater being weird?



They're being weird.  There's nothing particularly offensive in it for horror fans, casual or otherwise.
 
2013-08-25 03:34:46 PM  
I sill want to know why the movie skips the Carter admin.
 
2013-08-25 03:38:10 PM  

bugmn99: On topic question: The mom and pop theater by me put up a notice on their website that they were pulling all screenings of You're Next, with no further explanation. My assumption is they got some complaints for some reason. Anyone who's seen the movie have any insight? Is it any more offensive than the average horror flick, or is it just this particular theater being weird?


As a random-ass guess it could be that there were just too many hands in their pockets -- IIRC the producer's take alone is something around 50%?  A movie could sell out every night but if a theatre loses money on every patron, it's got a legitimate reason to pull the plug.
 
2013-08-25 03:46:35 PM  
The movie isn't called the Butler.

It's Oprah Winfrey's Swiss Handbag and the Butler, dammit!
 
2013-08-25 03:47:26 PM  

Apos: I'm probably in the minority, but I felt The World's End wasn't quite as hilarious as its predecessors. I can't quite put my finger on it, but the usual chemistry between Pegg and Frost seemed....absent. Perhaps a second viewing is in order.


With the first two they rifted on the films they were taking off, zombie films and cop films, playing with the troupes. With this film it is hard to tell which troupes they toyed with, instead it was pretty much was the troupes. It lacked heart and the man-child character was in no way redeemed or changed. In the film the "good guys" lost and the bad guy won. It would be like if the Zombies or NWA won in the other two films
 
2013-08-25 03:48:34 PM  
The best movies still showing right now are We're the Millers, Despicable Me 2, and The Spectacular Now.
 
2013-08-25 03:49:06 PM  
Gonna see You're Next this week. I heard it's pretty good and has some kind of Shalamladingdong twist.
 
2013-08-25 04:36:30 PM  

CruiserTwelve: enik: The fact the The Butler is number one on any list indicates just how pathetic our society has become.

Eh...It wasn't a bad movie. Told an interesting story but was very slow paced and overly long.


Yes a story. Full of distorted facts the average joe will take as fact. So sad!
 
2013-08-25 05:29:46 PM  

JosephFinn: robsul82: You're Next was not dismal nor torture porn.

Seriously.  It's a scary and at times quite funny home invasion movie that is by no means an Eli Roth flick.  Also, that damn song is still stuck in my head.


Not to mention it currently has an 80% on RT and TFA says it made $7 million this weekend. Not too shabby for a movie made for less than a million dollars.

Plus: Barbara Crampton!
 
2013-08-25 05:43:08 PM  
Will it blend?
 
2013-08-25 05:46:43 PM  
The guy at Deadpan Hollywood really doesn't seem to pay attention to the details regarding the industry he's trying to be an expert in.

But he's paying for the Fark links, so Drew just posts whatever the guy says to post.
 
2013-08-25 06:03:31 PM  

zedster: Apos: I'm probably in the minority, but I felt The World's End wasn't quite as hilarious as its predecessors. I can't quite put my finger on it, but the usual chemistry between Pegg and Frost seemed....absent. Perhaps a second viewing is in order.

With the first two they rifted on the films they were taking off, zombie films and cop films, playing with the troupes. With this film it is hard to tell which troupes they toyed with, instead it was pretty much was the troupes. It lacked heart and the man-child character was in no way redeemed or changed. In the film the "good guys" lost and the bad guy won. It would be like if the Zombies or NWA won in the other two films


Yeah. Maybe because I've been watching/playing Mass Effect 3 but I thought, when the movie was over, was that the main characters screwed up and doomed us all? Pyrrhic Victory and all that.
 
2013-08-25 06:04:01 PM  
I am usually pretty plugged in to pop culture (enough where I know about it even if I haven't seen or heard it) and this headline was the first time I heard of You're Next
 
2013-08-25 06:22:48 PM  

Mawson of the Antarctic: zedster: Apos: I'm probably in the minority, but I felt The World's End wasn't quite as hilarious as its predecessors. I can't quite put my finger on it, but the usual chemistry between Pegg and Frost seemed....absent. Perhaps a second viewing is in order.

With the first two they rifted on the films they were taking off, zombie films and cop films, playing with the troupes. With this film it is hard to tell which troupes they toyed with, instead it was pretty much was the troupes. It lacked heart and the man-child character was in no way redeemed or changed. In the film the "good guys" lost and the bad guy won. It would be like if the Zombies or NWA won in the other two films

Yeah. Maybe because I've been watching/playing Mass Effect 3 but I thought, when the movie was over, was that the main characters screwed up and doomed us all? Pyrrhic Victory and all that.


I don't buy that the aliens weren't evil. They killed a shiat ton of humans. And the ending makes zero sense from the technology side, but yes humans would be that drunk and stubborn. For the greater good.
 
2013-08-25 06:56:19 PM  

thecpt: And the ending makes zero sense from the technology side,


I thought that was just a final F you from the aliens.

thecpt: For the greater good.


Shut it!
 
2013-08-25 07:16:22 PM  
The World's End was funny, but definitely the weakest of the trilogy. That might be because by now, we kind of know what to expect from Pegg, Frost, and Wright. Still worth the time and money.

Saw We're the Millers last night, and honestly, I don't get why everyone thinks it's hilarious. It had a good premise and the first half was funny, but once they got back over the border, I got bored with it. All the comedy setups started seeming like they were from a rerun of Three's Company or something. Eventually, I didn't care how it ended so much as I just wanted it to end.
 
2013-08-25 07:16:28 PM  

fusillade762: JosephFinn: robsul82: You're Next was not dismal nor torture porn.


Plus: Barbara Crampton!


And boy, can she still scream!
 
2013-08-25 07:27:26 PM  
I saw "You're Next" - there is no torture porn in it. All kills are swift. You could call a character pulling a shard of glass out of their leg "torture porn", but that's a serious stretch.

Calling a horror movie "torture porn" just because it's a horror movie is asinine, Submitter.
 
2013-08-25 07:32:59 PM  

bugmn99: On topic question: The mom and pop theater by me put up a notice on their website that they were pulling all screenings of You're Next, with no further explanation. My assumption is they got some complaints for some reason. Anyone who's seen the movie have any insight? Is it any more offensive than the average horror flick, or is it just this particular theater being weird?

/It is sort of a weird theater
// Still gonna wait for PPV


I'm willing to bet because of the line "fark me next to your dead mother".
 
2013-08-25 07:35:13 PM  

JosephFinn: fusillade762: JosephFinn: robsul82: You're Next was not dismal nor torture porn.

Plus: Barbara Crampton!

And boy, can she still scream!


But does she still look good in bondage gear?
 
2013-08-25 07:40:31 PM  
JosephFinn:   Also, that damn song is still stuck in my head.

http://www.movies.com/movie-news/whats-the-song-in-youre-next/13320
 
2013-08-25 07:43:48 PM  
Question about "You're Next" - what was written on the windows in the beginning? I couldn't quite make it out.
 
2013-08-25 08:49:15 PM  
Is The World's End showing anywhere but a few art house cinemas in a few select cities?  It's not showing at a single theater within a hundred miles of me and I actually want to see it, weak or not.

/I might end up having to catch it on DVD just because it has such a small release
 
2013-08-25 08:53:30 PM  

Dalek Caan's doomed mistress: Is The World's End showing anywhere but a few art house cinemas in a few select cities?  It's not showing at a single theater within a hundred miles of me and I actually want to see it, weak or not.

/I might end up having to catch it on DVD just because it has such a small release


Played at my cinema. I'm in a decently sized city and there were only 10 people in there the saturday night of opening weekend. I'm guessing American crowds just don't dig it, which sucks cause it's highly quotable
 
2013-08-25 08:56:24 PM  

Jizz Master Zero: /Seriously wondering if Subby even saw it.
//Doubt it.


According to the box office receipts, probably not.
 
2013-08-25 09:14:18 PM  

thecpt: Dalek Caan's doomed mistress: Is The World's End showing anywhere but a few art house cinemas in a few select cities?  It's not showing at a single theater within a hundred miles of me and I actually want to see it, weak or not.

/I might end up having to catch it on DVD just because it has such a small release

Played at my cinema. I'm in a decently sized city and there were only 10 people in there the saturday night of opening weekend. I'm guessing American crowds just don't dig it, which sucks cause it's highly quotable


It is playing all over my city. I'm surprised about the turn out in your town, at the 11:40am this morning it was about 80 per cent full.
 
2013-08-25 10:03:54 PM  

Dalek Caan's doomed mistress: Is The World's End showing anywhere but a few art house cinemas in a few select cities?  It's not showing at a single theater within a hundred miles of me and I actually want to see it, weak or not.

/I might end up having to catch it on DVD just because it has such a small release


Strange. 1,400 theaters is a small release?

According to Box Office Mojo, The World's End is getting the widest release of any of the three films, hitting about three times as many theaters as Shaun of the Dead did in 2004 (and three hundred more than 2007's Hot Fuzz).
 
2013-08-25 11:02:32 PM  
Any idiot thinking that You're Next landed with a thud, think about this for comparison.  To be as successful week one, Pacific Rim would have had to gross 1.3 billion dollars week one to match it.
 
2013-08-25 11:02:52 PM  

fstop: Yes a story. Full of distorted facts the average joe will take as fact. So sad!


It wasn't that distorted, but they did use some dramatic license. It wasn't intended to be a documentary.
 
2013-08-25 11:33:26 PM  

Lackofname: Question about "You're Next" - what was written on the windows in the beginning? I couldn't quite make it out.


"You're Next", but on the outside so in reverse.

Lackofname: bugmn99: On topic question: The mom and pop theater by me put up a notice on their website that they were pulling all screenings of You're Next, with no further explanation. My assumption is they got some complaints for some reason. Anyone who's seen the movie have any insight? 

I'm willing to bet because of the line "fark me next to your dead mother".


Yeah, now that you mention it that could be a problem.
 
2013-08-25 11:36:58 PM  

fusillade762: Dalek Caan's doomed mistress: Is The World's End showing anywhere but a few art house cinemas in a few select cities?  It's not showing at a single theater within a hundred miles of me and I actually want to see it, weak or not.

/I might end up having to catch it on DVD just because it has such a small release

Strange. 1,400 theaters is a small release?

According to Box Office Mojo, The World's End is getting the widest release of any of the three films, hitting about three times as many theaters as Shaun of the Dead did in 2004 (and three hundred more than 2007's Hot Fuzz).


And still more than 1k less than the other movies that came out this week.
 
2013-08-26 12:02:41 AM  

Trocadero: fusillade762: Dalek Caan's doomed mistress: Is The World's End showing anywhere but a few art house cinemas in a few select cities?  It's not showing at a single theater within a hundred miles of me and I actually want to see it, weak or not.

/I might end up having to catch it on DVD just because it has such a small release

Strange. 1,400 theaters is a small release?

According to Box Office Mojo, The World's End is getting the widest release of any of the three films, hitting about three times as many theaters as Shaun of the Dead did in 2004 (and three hundred more than 2007's Hot Fuzz).

And still more than 1k less than the other movies that came out this week.


It's a low budget British comedy. They weren't going to print up copies to play in empty theaters in Spare Toe, Alabama.
 
2013-08-26 12:30:18 AM  

fusillade762: JosephFinn: robsul82: You're Next was not dismal nor torture porn.

Seriously.  It's a scary and at times quite funny home invasion movie that is by no means an Eli Roth flick.  Also, that damn song is still stuck in my head.

Not to mention it currently has an 80% on RT and TFA says it made $7 million this weekend. Not too shabby for a movie made for less than a million dollars.

Plus: Barbara Crampton!


CSB time: I saw it at the San Francisco International Film Festival this year and she was there with the crew to do a Q&A. Either SFIFF or the theater wouldn't let them do a meet and greet in the auditorium, so they hung out outside to meet and talk. I was going to just head home since it was late enough as it was and I figured they'd be swamped. Plus, I live in the east Bay Area, so I still had a drive ahead of me. I ended up in a conversation before I left the auditorium and there were only a few people out there by the time I got out, so I made a bee-line straight to her. Apparently I was one of the only people she met at the screening who recognized her from Re-Animator and From Beyond and whatnot. She was even cool enough to sign my Re-Animator Blu-ray, which I brought on the off chance I got to meet her. Incredibly nice lady and very supportive of the genre.
 
2013-08-26 12:39:26 AM  
I saw The World's End on Saturday; it was playing at only one theater in town this weekend.

I liked it! It wasn't weak, but it was a bit different. Where the first two movies only mixed two things at once (Shaun of the Dead mixed a zombie apocalypse and romantic comedy, and Hot Fuzz was mixing buddy cop movies and mystery-in-a-small-town movies), The World's End is mixing together more than just two things, so it seems not to work as well on the first viewing, but it does work.

BTW, the chemistry between Pegg and Frost is stilted in the beginning of TWE because it's supposed to be; Frost's character is holding a completely justifiable grudge against Pegg's character, and even near the end of the movie, they barely come to terms with it.

One thing I did like about the trilogy is that they got Bill Nighy to always play a part in which he has a slightly adversarial and authoritative role against Pegg's character. Also, seeing so many actors who played a main part in Spaced be part of The World's End was fun.

/The trilogy is over
//For the greater good
///(The greater good)
//Now what are they going to do next?
 
2013-08-26 03:16:43 AM  

dragonchild: bugmn99: On topic question: The mom and pop theater by me put up a notice on their website that they were pulling all screenings of You're Next, with no further explanation. My assumption is they got some complaints for some reason. Anyone who's seen the movie have any insight? Is it any more offensive than the average horror flick, or is it just this particular theater being weird?

As a random-ass guess it could be that there were just too many hands in their pockets -- IIRC the producer's take alone is something around 50%?  A movie could sell out every night but if a theatre loses money on every patron, it's got a legitimate reason to pull the plug.


That's not how distribution deals work, so it might be that the mom and pop has their panties in a bunch for some reason. It could also be a publicity stunt.

If you are interested, here's the spiel:

1. Production Company A makes a movie.
2. Production Company B purchases a share in the film in exchange for access to their distributor.Distributors are the unfortunate "middle man" in the film industry who decide which films go theaters and which go to DVD. These guys are risk venture capitalists a la Wall Street, but instead of trading stocks and commodities they do 3.
3. The Distributor, in exchange for a huge cut of the box office, pays for all advertising and physical distribution of the movie. They also cover the cost of the very expensive 35mm show reels, though that rarely happens anymore.
4. The Distributor, with a pre-existing contract with the theater chains, assign the films to theaters in each market for what the distributor believes will allow for maximum profitability.
5. Theaters release the film. On opening weekend, 95% of the ticket price is divided between the distributor and the production companies. The distributor get's most of it for that weekend.
6. Starting Monday, the theater gets 10% of the ticket sales. Second weekend, 75% and so on and so forth until the split is 50/50. This is the reason it is so important for theaters that movies do well enough to get a 3+ week run, because only in to week 2 do they even make a profit on ticket sales.

Theaters are NOT in the movie business. The input of theater owners means all of jack and shiat. They are in the concessions business. That is why popcorn, soda, candy, etc are so expensive at your local AMC.

A theater is allowed to pull a film if they have some form of local outcry, but they end up paying a penalty to do so. What may be going on is that this particular film is distributed by a smaller distributor and this was a marketing ploy with an insignificant chain to create "controversy" to boost ticket sales.
 
2013-08-26 03:19:32 AM  
Starting Monday, the theater gets 10% of the ticket sales. Second weekend, 75% and so on and so forth until the split is 50/50.

Sorry, that should be that second weekend the theater gets 15% and so on...
 
2013-08-26 07:28:05 AM  

www.rawstory.com
"But...I don't understand...I attention-whored and EVERYTHING!!!"

 
2013-08-26 07:29:17 AM  

vonster: I sill want to know why the movie skips the Carter admin.


Jimmy Carter said, "No?"

/nothing's obscure on Fark
 
2013-08-26 10:05:18 AM  

Evi1Bo1weevi1: 6. Starting Monday, the theater gets 10% of the ticket sales. Second weekend, 75% and so on and so forth until the split is 50/50. This is the reason it is so important for theaters that movies do well enough to get a 3+ week run, because only in to week 2 do they even make a profit on ticket sales.


This hasn't been true for the better part of a decade.  With few exceptions the split is the same the entire run of a film.  This was changed because so many theaters were going under in the late 90's.
 
Displayed 68 of 68 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report