TappingTheVein: vygramul: like his obsession over Zimmerman's Jewish ancestrySeriously ? this is great stuff. Got a link ?
vygramul: Found it:Underlined and in all-caps to make sure no one missed it.
vygramul: Well, since you rushed in here to white knight for the anti-Semite
The Muthaship: TappingTheVein: The Muthaship: Did you just link to your own attempted zinger on a fellow Farker?More like TappingTheVain.You mean a links to his quotes, his posts, as in undeniable proof including a post where he was caught lying about it ?Hmmm.. I wonder what made you post such a stupid comment.I didn't read it other than what you said about him lying. Conceding entirely your point that you caught him lying and he is the anti-semite you say he is, you still look pathetic for linking to your own "outing" of him.So wonder no longer./I think AQ is a moron as well//mainly for his nonsense in the Dorner threads.
vygramul: TappingTheVein: tirob, just a little background information about Fark's resident anti-semite Amos Quito:he's a rabid anti-semite sack of shiat who blames "the jews/zionists/Israel" on things ranging from conspiracies about JFK's murder, the Holocaust, the revolution in Egypt, you name it.Of course he does it in his "*wink* *wink* i'm only asking questions here but.. you saif it! not I!" technique like a retarded child which makes it more hilarious when he is caught lying about it.He's "hinting" here Amos Quito(tm) style that Israel is behind the WMD attacks in Syria.. ? ahha..hahahaha!He pretends it's all about Zionists, but he mysteriously ends up in every thread about Jews. His "information" is always negative, even when he's frying bigger fish, like his obsession over Zimmerman's Jewish ancestry.
The Muthaship: vygramul: Well, since you rushed in here to white knight for the anti-SemiteI was strictly pimping the guy who is his own hero. As I stated earlier, I have no use for AQ.
tirob: Amos Quito: Then why deny the possibility?I haven't denied the possibility. I have said that I have not yet seen any evidence that anyone other than Assad was responsible for the gas attack. And you haven't provided any here.Amos Quito: 1. I see no linkSecondhand source, Mr. Al-Kana's post at La Presse that I reproduced in my 9:07 post.Amos Quito: 2. With no access to the area, how would Assad know whether and actual attack occurred - rather than just propaganda? Is he psychic?Mr. Al-Kana didn't assert that Assad claimed not to know about any chemical attack. He asserted that Assad flatly denied that any massacre took place at all in the area where the chemical attack was reported.You seem sure that Assad has no way of getting information from the area affected. Al-Kana appears to think that Assad claims to know what happened in the area.
tirob: Amos Quito: False flag ops and false intel ops (such as WMD's in Iraq) can be extremely valuable if well played - especially if you have a cooperative media.Theoretically, yes. We don't know that this episode in Syria was either of those things, and you have provided no evidence here that it was either of those things.
tirob: Amos Quito: You think that the Palestinians are clever enough to sneak in missiles, munitions and rockets into Gaza, but there is NO WAI that interested parties with vastly greater resources could POSSIBLY sneak a chemical weapon into the middle of the Syrian chaos?Bullshiat. The weapon need not have even been fired. It could have been smuggled in and detonated on site.Hamas is sneaking their ordnance into a (by and large) friendly territory where their members have friends and family. I assume by "interested parties with vastly greater resources" you mean Israel. A theoretical Israeli smuggling operation would be through hostile territory where the theoretical smugglers have no contacts at all, and where locals would instantly recognize an outsider, and where at least some of the locals would report that outsider at once to the Baathist authorities who are still in place in much of Syria. I don't know about "no wai," but your scenario sounds just as far-fetched to me as the false flag missile scenario that you dismiss.
tirob: Amos Quito: I saw you make a 180 degree change your position when evidence was properly presented. But that was in the Zimmerman caseYou have presented no evidence here, just conjecture.
Amos Quito: Oh, by all means, PLEASE DO click on Tappy's links - and see where they go - usually they link to MORE of Tappy's own posts with MORE links that go to still MORE of Tappy's own posts (etc) and if you ever DO manage to get to the center of Tappy's Russian Doll, you'll find that his accusations were baseless lies.
Amos Quito: Earlier you berated me for calling the attack "alleged". Well, guess who said what:Obama: Syria chemical weapon claim a 'grave concern'"US President Barack Obama has said the alleged use of chemical weapons in Syria in an attack on Wednesday is a "big event of grave concern".
Amos Quito: We don't know that this episode in Syria was either of those things, and you have provided no evidence here that it was either of those things.We don't know one way or another - yet - but all circumstantial and motivational evidence points to my being correct.I stand by what I wrote. You have up to this point provided nothing to back your "correct" claim except surmise, innuendo, "would have," and "could have."Amos Quito: What makes you think it would necessarily have been Israeli nationals who would have done the smuggling?
Amos Quito: NO ONE has presented any evidence yet. It is ALL conjecture
Amos Quito: It just so happens that my line of reasoning is far more in sync with reality than the hand-waving and bullshiat that the Western pundits have been spewing - and that you have subscribed to.
Amos Quito: That's it. G-d forbid that you be accused of agreeing with someone who's been accused of (GASP) anti-Semitism!!!11
tirob: Amos Quito: Earlier you berated me for calling the attack "alleged". Well, guess who said what:Obama: Syria chemical weapon claim a 'grave concern'"US President Barack Obama has said the alleged use of chemical weapons in Syria in an attack on Wednesday is a "big event of grave concern".What I said was this:"As for your use of the word "alleged," I have seen no source that asserts that [a gas attack] didn't happen, not even the article you linked here."As of now, the only *denial* that I know of so far has come from the Syrian government, which has denied that any massacre of any kind took place at Ghouta.You have up to this point provided no evidence that my source Basel Al-Kana is mistaken when he claimed that a gas attack occurred; indeed, you have refrained from answering a single one of his points here.
tirob: Amos Quito: We don't know that this episode in Syria was either of those things, and you have provided no evidence here that it was either of those things.We don't know one way or another - yet - but all circumstantial and motivational evidence points to my being correct.I stand by what I wrote. You have up to this point provided nothing to back your "correct" claim except surmise, innuendo, "would have," and "could have."
tirob: Amos Quito: What makes you think it would necessarily have been Israeli nationals who would have done the smuggling?More "would have," but I'll try to answer your point anyway. I referred to your hypothetical phantom smugglers as "outsiders," and I did so on purpose to include non-Israelis that the Mossad hypothetically could have recruited. In other words, you missed my point.
tirob: Amos Quito: NO ONE has presented any evidence yet. It is ALL conjectureAs I stated above, Basel Al-Kana has made charges backed by evidence that you have chosen thus far not to respond to. See my post of 9:07 yesterday.
Amos Quito: You show me "evidence", and I'll respondWhat? You want me to provide "evidence" that your source is "mistaken"? LOL! As for the "unanswered points", I believe I addressed every one. Be specific.
Amos Quito: Looking more and more possible all the time, isn't it?
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Aug 18 2017 12:42:02
Runtime: 0.434 sec (434 ms)