If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Think Progress)   Pastor wanders around with an AR-15 across his back because he's upset that he can't wander around with a pistol openly carried on his hip   (thinkprogress.org) divider line 287
    More: Dumbass, assault rifles, long rifle, handguns  
•       •       •

6256 clicks; posted to Main » on 21 Aug 2013 at 4:50 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



287 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-08-21 07:35:53 AM

Oxygen_Thief: except i already fought in an asymmetrical war..I know shocking... don't remember lots of pilots getting shot in their bunks or mass amounts of sentries for that matter. Besides me thinks QRF be on you quick fast and in a hurry.


what was the name of that war we were in that we didn't win and the enemy had no air support to speak of? I think it started with a V.... oh nevermind... that was a "police action"
 
2013-08-21 07:36:04 AM
i41.tinypic.com
God has mercy. I don't.
 
2013-08-21 07:36:31 AM
I don't have a problem with people carrying guns, I have a problem with people who think their town is so dangerous and so crime ridden they need to (no, it really isn't, you're just paranoid and self-righteous.)
 
2013-08-21 07:37:09 AM

Click Click D'oh: How quaint, all the silly Farkers have come out of the woodwork again to try to pretend there's such a thing as a "collective right"  Lol.

That's okay, it makes it easy to figure out who the idiots are.


*whispers in your ear*.... psst, you know you just said that in the same thread you are also in, right?

:P
 
2013-08-21 07:37:47 AM

forcebender: I don't have a problem with people carrying guns, I have a problem with people who think their town is so dangerous and so crime ridden they need to (no, it really isn't, you're just paranoid and self-righteous.)


Detroit would like a word with you.
 
2013-08-21 07:38:32 AM

Kibbler: USP .45: Kibbler: Why can't I carry a bazooka onto an airplane, is all I want to know.

because you'd be retarded

Would you like to guess how often that phrase enters normal people's minds when we hear about a "preacher" making a "protest" at Walmart, of all places, because he can strap a rifle across his back, or he can carry a pistol openly if he has a permit, but he can't carry a concealed pistol into friggin' Walmart?


(Hint:  somewhere between 100% and 100% of the time.)

Now.  Why can Congress restrict my civil liberties but Walmart can't?  Is "because you'd be retarded" the only argument?





Private propriety rights. Despite what some people you can deny some to enter
 
2013-08-21 07:38:49 AM

lewismarktwo: Damn, I had thought that one would still be in police lock up. How did he get his hands on that?

/fark your appeal to emotion 'think progress'


They also call an AR-15 an 'assault rifle' which it is not.

USP .45: They did so erroneously (trench shotguns were in service in the military), but nevertheless, that's what they ruled.


Because Miller was dead and nobody showed up from his side to present any evidence, which meant SCOTUS couldn't consider that. They had only the government's case to hear, which made it kind of a default ruling. Wrong, but the government won that by default.

PunGent: Second, as to why not everyone should own an AT4 or a Bradley...those things weren't around at the time of signing the Constitution. Neither was weaponized anthrax, or nuclear weapons. We have no idea how the Founders would have ruled on those things...and they're dead, so we can't ask them. It's up to us now.


Neither were computers, or the Internet, but we're pretty farking sure the First Amendment applies to those.
 
2013-08-21 07:39:54 AM

Kibbler: Would you like to guess how often that phrase enters normal people's minds when we hear about a "preacher" making a "protest" at Walmart, of all places, because he can strap a rifle across his back, or he can carry a pistol openly if he has a permit, but he can't carry a concealed pistol into friggin' Walmart?


(Hint:  somewhere between 100% and 100% of the time.)

Now.  Why can Congress restrict my civil liberties but Walmart can't?  Is "because you'd be retarded" the only argument?


The protest isn't against wal-mart, that's just where he happened to be for this new story.  Even the article admits (which is amazing for ThinkProgress) that he's protesting Texas firearms law under which it is perfectly legal for any person to carry around a loaded rifle openly, but completely illegal for any person, even with a handgun permit, to carry around a pistol openly.  Texas is one of only about half a dozen states where it is still illegal to openly carry a handgun.
 
2013-08-21 07:40:49 AM

heili skrimsli: PunGent: Second, as to why not everyone should own an AT4 or a Bradley...those things weren't around at the time of signing the Constitution. Neither was weaponized anthrax, or nuclear weapons. We have no idea how the Founders would have ruled on those things...and they're dead, so we can't ask them. It's up to us now.

Neither were computers, or the Internet, but we're pretty farking sure the First Amendment applies to those.


Something the DMCA and NSA would like to "rectify"
 
2013-08-21 07:41:18 AM

Mid_mo_mad_man: Kibbler: USP .45: Kibbler: Why can't I carry a bazooka onto an airplane, is all I want to know.

because you'd be retarded

Would you like to guess how often that phrase enters normal people's minds when we hear about a "preacher" making a "protest" at Walmart, of all places, because he can strap a rifle across his back, or he can carry a pistol openly if he has a permit, but he can't carry a concealed pistol into friggin' Walmart?


(Hint:  somewhere between 100% and 100% of the time.)

Now.  Why can Congress restrict my civil liberties but Walmart can't?  Is "because you'd be retarded" the only argument?

Private propriety rights. Despite what some people you can deny someone the right to enter

 
2013-08-21 07:41:34 AM

Oxygen_Thief: except i already fought in an asymmetrical war..I know shocking... don't remember lots of pilots getting shot in their bunks or mass amounts of sentries for that matter.


did you win?
 
2013-08-21 07:41:46 AM

HindiDiscoMonster: Oxygen_Thief: except i already fought in an asymmetrical war..I know shocking... don't remember lots of pilots getting shot in their bunks or mass amounts of sentries for that matter. Besides me thinks QRF be on you quick fast and in a hurry.

what was the name of that war we were in that we didn't win and the enemy had no air support to speak of? I think it started with a V.... oh nevermind... that was a "police action"


I get your point but things do not work like they did then.  Certainly you agree with that, but if your goal is to scare politicians and one day rise up against the Gov you will have a bad day I promise you this is not the 1960's my man.  And my war was freedom or something so there.
 
2013-08-21 07:41:50 AM

HindiDiscoMonster: Take up arms against the United States British Empire, and you will be on the wrong end of the M-16 or M-24 musket I'll bear in response to treason.

I'll bet that's exactly the same argument the continental congress had too.


Fark. Off.
Can you name your ancestors, both maternal and paternal, who fought on the American side of the Revolution? I can. Did your male ancestors from that time forward all serve, right on down to your uncles, and did you bury your father's remains within spitting distance of the Pentagon? Did all of your brothers and male cousins, and you, personally, stick your right paw up in the air and put your own life on the line for the Constitution of the United States of America? Because all of these things are true of me and mine.
Bearing arms?
Been there.
Done that.
Got the farking fruit salad.

Take your unqualified opinion, engrave it on sheet aluminum, fold it until it's all corners, remembering to make relief cuts to ease folding, and stick it next to your seditious cranio-coccyx.

If you take up arms against the United States, do not doubt that I will take up arms against you.
 
2013-08-21 07:42:45 AM
Thus, the weapon that is most likely to be used in a gun murder is also the hardest weapon to regulate under this Supreme Court.

Yeah... GOOD!  Its for a damned good reason...

/see how they hold out hope that they can crack down on handguns with a few more presidential nominations to the supreme court?
//bastards...
 
2013-08-21 07:43:09 AM

Oxygen_Thief: HindiDiscoMonster: Oxygen_Thief: except i already fought in an asymmetrical war..I know shocking... don't remember lots of pilots getting shot in their bunks or mass amounts of sentries for that matter. Besides me thinks QRF be on you quick fast and in a hurry.

what was the name of that war we were in that we didn't win and the enemy had no air support to speak of? I think it started with a V.... oh nevermind... that was a "police action"

I get your point but things do not work like they did then.  Certainly you agree with that, but if your goal is to scare politicians and one day rise up against the Gov you will have a bad day I promise you this is not the 1960's my man.  And my war was freedom or something so there.


Look man, just pass the LSD and let's just relax... :P
 
2013-08-21 07:43:31 AM
@HindiDiscoMonster  I also have a problem with people using one small sample point to extrapolate that their argument covers all samples.

Detroit is one city out of ~20,000;  it's population is roughly 0.2% of the US population.
 
2013-08-21 07:43:49 AM

taurusowner: You don't have to like the fact that bearing arms is a Constitutionally protected right. But that's the neat thing about rights and about the Constitution. They're most needed and most useful especially when people don't want others to have those rights. The Bill of Rights was written down just in case people in the future didn't like others doing certain things and tried to force them to stop. Bearing arms was one of those things. So it was listed just so that we in the future are fully aware that others have the right to bear arms, not only if we don't like it, but  especially if we don't like it.


Try gettin a  life. Moran.
 
2013-08-21 07:46:54 AM

demaL-demaL-yeH: HindiDiscoMonster: Take up arms against the United States British Empire, and you will be on the wrong end of the M-16 or M-24 musket I'll bear in response to treason.

I'll bet that's exactly the same argument the continental congress had too.

Fark. Off.
Can you name your ancestors, both maternal and paternal, who fought on the American side of the Revolution? I can. Did your male ancestors from that time forward all serve, right on down to your uncles, and did you bury your father's remains within spitting distance of the Pentagon? Did all of your brothers and male cousins, and you, personally, stick your right paw up in the air and put your own life on the line for the Constitution of the United States of America? Because all of these things are true of me and mine.
Bearing arms?
Been there.
Done that.
Got the farking fruit salad.

Take your unqualified opinion, engrave it on sheet aluminum, fold it until it's all corners, remembering to make relief cuts to ease folding, and stick it next to your seditious cranio-coccyx.

If you take up arms against the United States, do not doubt that I will take up arms against you.


did you get a little mahogany writing that?
1> I never said I would take up arms.
2> wow, you are a geneology expert... I think my pinky just got hard.
3> unfortunatly, the service would not take me due to a condition i was born with (not my fault), but i did try anyway.
4> I am not a conspiracy theorist....

/have you heard that cattle mutilations are up?
 
2013-08-21 07:47:59 AM

forcebender: @HindiDiscoMonster  I also have a problem with people using one small sample point to extrapolate that their argument covers all samples.

Detroit is one city out of ~20,000;  it's population is roughly 0.2% of the US population.


you also apparently have problems with humor, and using the quote button, but who is counting? :)
 
2013-08-21 07:48:03 AM

USP .45: Oxygen_Thief: except i already fought in an asymmetrical war..I know shocking... don't remember lots of pilots getting shot in their bunks or mass amounts of sentries for that matter.

did you win?


Thats like asking one troop if they "won" the war in Korea.  "I parachuted in and killed Kim-jong ill all on my lonsome.  That pilot is just there for sure seriously.

That depends on how one describes "win" I lived it..I fought in it..I lived.caught some bad guys.honestly how do you even answer a question like that.
 
2013-08-21 07:49:02 AM

Click Click D'oh: Kibbler: Would you like to guess how often that phrase enters normal people's minds when we hear about a "preacher" making a "protest" at Walmart, of all places, because he can strap a rifle across his back, or he can carry a pistol openly if he has a permit, but he can't carry a concealed pistol into friggin' Walmart?


(Hint:  somewhere between 100% and 100% of the time.)

Now.  Why can Congress restrict my civil liberties but Walmart can't?  Is "because you'd be retarded" the only argument?

The protest isn't against wal-mart, that's just where he happened to be for this new story.  Even the article admits (which is amazing for ThinkProgress) that he's protesting Texas firearms law under which it is perfectly legal for any person to carry around a loaded rifle openly, but completely illegal for any person, even with a handgun permit, to carry around a pistol openly.  Texas is one of only about half a dozen states where it is still illegal to openly carry a handgun.


I understand the protest is not directed specifically at Walmart.  But it's where he chose to make it.

Now if the issue were, say, the ethical treatment of animals, or access to the morning-after pill, and the protest was held at a Texas Walmart, I wonder what the reaction would be of the people who cheer this guy on for standing up for constitutional rights.

"Burn them! Burn the trespassing terrorists!" probably.
 
2013-08-21 07:49:02 AM

demaL-demaL-yeH: If you take up arms against the United States, do not doubt that I will take up arms against you.


your oath is to the Constitution, not the actual land mass or title.

If you're a new found leftist, then your oath is to the title, and land mass, with no regard for any fixed constitution.
 
2013-08-21 07:49:11 AM

HindiDiscoMonster: Oxygen_Thief: HindiDiscoMonster: Oxygen_Thief: except i already fought in an asymmetrical war..I know shocking... don't remember lots of pilots getting shot in their bunks or mass amounts of sentries for that matter. Besides me thinks QRF be on you quick fast and in a hurry.

what was the name of that war we were in that we didn't win and the enemy had no air support to speak of? I think it started with a V.... oh nevermind... that was a "police action"

I get your point but things do not work like they did then.  Certainly you agree with that, but if your goal is to scare politicians and one day rise up against the Gov you will have a bad day I promise you this is not the 1960's my man.  And my war was freedom or something so there.

Look man, just pass the LSD and let's just relax... :P


LSD is before my time...im thinking bath salts
 
2013-08-21 07:52:33 AM

thamike: Do paranoid right wing gunporn morons have their own "You're not helping" meme?  Because that would fit nicely here.


lol that would require self-awareness and introspection

just lol
 
2013-08-21 07:54:40 AM

HindiDiscoMonster: speaking of Netflix, they have a new show they are producing "House of Cards" which looks pretty interesting.


Not sure if this is a joke I'm missing... But, they've already finished and released the first season of their new "House of Cards" remake long ago... And, yes, it's quite excellent! Definitely check it out if you haven't yet... I'm eagerly awaiting season 2...

/On topic, all I have to say is that if you're protesting the overly strict gun laws of Texas, well...
//No, I don't actually have any words for my feelings on that...
 
2013-08-21 07:55:17 AM

Cold_Sassy: demaL-demaL-yeH: ...Concealed carry is cowardice squared.
Stop pissing your pants, pay attention to your surroundings, and don't walk around an armed douchebag.

Stop being so stupid.  Not everybody is the iron man/he-man that you are.  Are you bullet-proof?
If you're a 5'4" 120# woman, I call it leveling the playing field.


I'm not bulletproof. I'm also not in a war zone.
I am aware of my surroundings.
I'm not walking around afraid.
If you're walking around armed absent good reason (see above), you are afraid.

I'm certain that I won't be able to wrap my mind around any "justification" you can proffer for being among unarmed people with lethal force as your first (and, so far only named) resort - you know, in order to "level" the playing field -, so don't bother.

/Don't wet pants chafe and give you rashes after a while?
 
2013-08-21 07:55:45 AM
I mean I sort of get it. He's a Texan and Texas law requires a certain amount of derping to stay a citizen. But a preacher walking around with an AR-15!?!?!  That's wtf even for Texas.

/ Who would Jesus shoot?
 
2013-08-21 07:57:29 AM

demaL-demaL-yeH: cranio-coccyx.


HindiDiscoMonster: unfortunatly, the service would not take me due to a condition i was born with (not my fault), but i did try anyway.


Already named it.
 
2013-08-21 07:57:37 AM

thamike: Do paranoid right wing gunporn morons have their own "You're not helping" meme?  Because that would fit nicely here.


in typical insurgenty red dawn fashion we live off the land so to speak and just use the Jon Stewart one.
 
2013-08-21 07:58:17 AM

thamike: Do paranoid right wing gunporn morons have their own "You're not helping" meme?


Yes they do. His name is Ted Nugent.
 
2013-08-21 08:00:28 AM

heili skrimsli: They also call an AR-15 an 'assault rifle' which it is not.


I am pretty sure that is what AR stands for.


/i keed
 
2013-08-21 08:04:18 AM
Hmm, is it legal? Then no big deal. There are more things to worry about in this world than a man who wants attention.
 
2013-08-21 08:05:53 AM
This sort of thing is the reason I haven't set food inside a Protestant church in . . . gosh, probably seven years.

With the exception of smaller, more progressive sects like Unitarians and Anglicans, Protestant churches in the US generally are nothing more than right-wing nutjob recruitment centers.
 
2013-08-21 08:10:12 AM

taurusowner: Good for him. The bearing of arms is a Constitutional right. Might open carry upset some people? Yep. Well so did seeing an African American sitting at a table in a diner some time back. But they protested in the open and did things that some people might have thought outrageous. They did it to make it so their rights were recognized. And this citizen is doing the same. And yes, the two issues are similar. Citizens have a number of Rights protected by the Constitution. And one of them is peaceful protesting and demonstrating to ensure the rest of the rights remain recognized. The peaceful bearing of arms as an act of public education and demonstration is his right, and I for one am happy to see him exercise it.


In, 554http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=U S&v ol=554&page=570"  the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment ... ...stated that "the right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose". They also clarified that many longstanding prohibitions and restrictions on firearms possession listed by the Court are consistent with the Second Amendment

What we ought to do is to clarify the second amendment removing peoples right to have guns outside a well regulated militia. This pastor is seemingly campaigning for the opposite.
 
2013-08-21 08:13:05 AM

USP .45: demaL-demaL-yeH: If you take up arms against the United States, do not doubt that I will take up arms against you.

your oath is to the Constitution, not the actual land mass or title.
If you're a new found leftist, then your oath is to the title, and land mass, with no regard for any fixed constitution.


Hmm. The Constitution. The one that specifies what constitutes treason? The one that says I am subject to civilian authority and my chain of command under the UCMJ?
The one which establishes the United States as a nation of laws?
That Constitution?
I'm obligated to defend that land mass, and the system of law, and the rule of law, and the government established by those laws, and the people subject to those laws.

We done settled that issue definitively in the early 1860s: Take up arms against the United States, and I will take up arms against you.

/And mine won't be German-made, either.
 
2013-08-21 08:14:06 AM
Jim_Callahan:
//It's not that odd that they'd eject you from a Wal-Mart for carrying a rifle around-- not because they care about you being armed, but because that's a product they sell and they don't usually want you bringing in stuff they sell beyond essential stuff like clothing.  Loss prevention.

Yeah, they kicked him out because they thought he stole it, not because he was scaring everyone.
 
2013-08-21 08:19:42 AM
zach.craigsniffen.com

I actually favor open carry, but with the riders that a) you have to be trained b) a can of pepper spray must be integrated into your holster.
 
2013-08-21 08:20:32 AM
A preacher in Texas who has no idea what Jesus said about violence. I'm shocked, shocked I tell you. And yes his being a preacher should come ahead of any second amendment issues.
 
2013-08-21 08:24:26 AM
Everytime I see somebody "protest carrying" with a rifle slung behind the back like that, I have to kind of chuckle.

if you got blitz attacked from an angle (which wouldn't be that hard in a place like Walmart), even a moderately skilled attacker could take that gun an shove it up your ass in short order...

// gun owner CHL holder
// open handgun carry is legal in my state, but I'd prefer the world NOT know Imam carrying
 
2013-08-21 08:25:04 AM
I'd love to know the name of his well-regulated militia.
 
2013-08-21 08:28:13 AM

dforkus: I'd prefer the world NOT know Imam carrying


See, people?
Muslim clergy. Definitely has received death threats.
That is good reason to walk around armed.
 
2013-08-21 08:30:13 AM
If only there was a higher power this guy could rely on that would protect him.
 
2013-08-21 08:32:52 AM
You all mock this preacher but I don't. I'm sure in a few months we are going to have a follow up of him saving the day. Only question will be a Arab terrorist cell he takes down or a black street thug aka Zimmerman style.
 
2013-08-21 08:32:54 AM

stuhayes2010: If only there was a higher power this guy could rely on that would protect him.


You're saying he should upgrade to .45 ACP? Not a bad idea...
 
2013-08-21 08:33:07 AM
AR15? Pretty weak for a holy man.
i.imgur.com.

No, but really, besides it being tacky to bring into a supermarket, this is a non-issue.
/Texas liberal.
//Gotta love that bill of rights.
 
2013-08-21 08:35:03 AM
I'm getting a kick...
That guy used to work where I do.

Everyone says he was a nice guy.
 
2013-08-21 08:35:48 AM

demaL-demaL-yeH: Hmm. The Constitution.


yep that. no spin. that.
 
2013-08-21 08:39:07 AM
Does it mean anything that USP 45 and taurusowner are references to weapons.  I suppose tarusowner could be a deep emotional attachment to Fords but I'm pretty sure not.  I'm from Nebraska - out in the sandhills we always had a rifle handy for snakes and beasties that endangered the livestock.  It was a tool not an item of lust.  People who lust after their guns are worrisome.  If they need the manhood boost get a fast boat or a Porsche.
 
2013-08-21 08:39:56 AM

USP .45: demaL-demaL-yeH: If you take up arms against the United States, do not doubt that I will take up arms against you.

your oath is to the Constitution, not the actual land mass or title.

If you're a new found leftist, then your oath is to the title, and land mass, with no regard for any fixed constitution.


Fixed constitution?  The Constitution is not fixed.  There's a whole section of it devoted to the ways in which it can be changed, either via direct modification (Amendments), execution (Executive Branch enforcement, or lack thereof), or interpretation (Supreme Court rulings).  The Constitution is not, and should never be, a fixed document.  This is why I laugh at the second amendment folks who only refer to the original text of the second amendment and ignore the piles and piles of surrounding legal doctrine that is just as constitutionally valid.

And before you get into the whole Leftist/Liberal/pollywog name calling.  Yes, I self-identify as a liberal.  I am pro second amendment.  in fact, I personally believe that schools should be teaching a comprehensive gun safety program that includes the students firing a gun of some kind.  Abstinence-only education doesn't work for sex-ed, and it doesn't work for gun-ed either.
 
2013-08-21 08:41:41 AM
Came here to point this out. Thanks lewismarktwo."the same weapon used to kill 20 children and six adults in the Newtown, Connecticut school shooting."

Damn, I had thought that one would still be in police lock up. How did he get his hands on that?
 
Displayed 50 of 287 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report