If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Think Progress)   Oklahoma oil billionaire hates wind turbines because they make the landscape look weird, as compared to those sexy oil derricks   (thinkprogress.org) divider line 105
    More: Dumbass, Oklahoma, shale oil, oil derrick, Middle Eastern countries  
•       •       •

3849 clicks; posted to Main » on 21 Aug 2013 at 12:35 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



105 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-08-20 09:33:19 PM  
Well, yeah, windmills just spin around, while oil derricks just keep pumping in and out, in and out. Thrusting into the Earth, penetrating deep into the crust, pumping, always pumping...

I'm sorry, is it hot in here?
 
2013-08-20 09:38:54 PM  
Oh yeah, baby, take it!

www.gifmania.co.uk

Oh, gonna blow!

www.gifmania.co.uk

Mmmm ... that's good lovin', baby.
 
2013-08-20 10:24:37 PM  
The Republican's insistence that wind farms are this huge eye sore can only be explained by this:

static.someecards.com
 
2013-08-20 11:47:49 PM  
FTFA: Shale oil billionaire Harold Hamm said in an this week that clean energy doesn't deserve federal subsidies in part because windmills are haunting to look at.

Oklahomans for their part will not care about anything Hamm says about energy in public discourse. They've cast their lot with T. Boone Pickens in this area. Especially since Pickens practically funds Oklahoma State University.
 
2013-08-21 12:00:38 AM  
There are three large wind farms around where I live in NW Oklahoma. It's a major industry in the area.

/Oil industry is booming, too.
//There's room for both.
 
2013-08-21 12:42:32 AM  
Those sexy, sexy oil derricks.

/oil biz pays my bills
 
2013-08-21 12:46:21 AM  
Well, I do not like oil spills.  So because of that there should be no federal benefits for oil drilling.
 
2013-08-21 12:50:46 AM  
Wow. Just... wow!

'WE should do something to stop THEM from overpopulating the MidEast and Africa.'

How 'bout WE start by neutering YOU and YOUR KIDS. Trust me, it'll do way more to save the planet.
 
2013-08-21 12:51:22 AM  

HawgWild: Oh yeah, baby, take it!

[www.gifmania.co.uk image 130x100]

Oh, gonna blow!

[www.gifmania.co.uk image 120x120]

Mmmm ... that's good lovin', baby.


Just don't go lighting that cigarette...
 
2013-08-21 12:51:49 AM  

Mock26: Well, I do not like oil spills.  So because of that there should be no federal benefits for oil drilling.


/passes Mock26 some kleenex.
 
2013-08-21 12:52:04 AM  
I am finding it hard to feel sorry for him, guess I am just tired?
 
2013-08-21 12:52:27 AM  
If you want something haunting, peruse the people of Wal-Mart from Oklahoma bored shopping for ammunition for their kids.
 
2013-08-21 12:53:01 AM  
Wasn't it Ted Kennedy who led the lawsuit to prevent wind turbines within sight of his estate?

Without tax breaks and subsidies, very few of these things can even break even.
 
2013-08-21 12:55:36 AM  
His first love was named derrick, but he was tragically killed in a windmill accident. To this day he spreads oily derricks across the land in his memory and fights the dangerous windmills at every chance
 
2013-08-21 12:58:35 AM  
Yeah, you just hate that they cut into your profits
 
2013-08-21 01:03:28 AM  

nmrsnr: Well, yeah, windmills just spin around, while oil derricks just keep pumping in and out, in and out. Thrusting into the Earth, penetrating deep into the crust, pumping, always pumping...

I'm sorry, is it hot in here?


imgs.xkcd.com
 
2013-08-21 01:04:55 AM  
He should just switch off his mind and let his heart decide who he was meant to be. . .
 
2013-08-21 01:06:13 AM  
Sterilize the Duggars to curb global warming?

/am ok with this
 
2013-08-21 01:09:04 AM  
He's got a point, look at that hideous monstrosity.  And I can smell the clean air from here, disgusting.

www.misterhire.com

/ aware that a windmill is not a turbine
// nothing could make the flat, desolate shiatholes known as OK and TX look weirder
 
2013-08-21 01:09:54 AM  
embracing clean energy, which is popular even among Republican voters.

it's not popular among any voters when you get more specific than "clean energy," specific like "more expensive energy." Grownup decisions don't sell.
 
2013-08-21 01:10:06 AM  
I'm not fond of the terms "clean energy" and "green energy". I fully support wind and solar power. I don't like these terms because I believe we'll run out of coal and oil long before we darken the skies and pollute our fresh water. I'm a fan of "sustainable energy". I've built substations for wind farms, updated a substation for an oil refinery, worked on the iso-phase inside a nuclear plant, and substations outside of coal and natural gas plants. Oil refineries are corodid, rusted and deteriorated from the chemicals in the air. Coal plants have a mile long train of coal delivered every day. Then there is the sight of the coal yard to look at. Natural gas plants are fairly clean. The nuclear plant was clean too, but there's the risk involved, which I'm not opposed to, if done safely. Look at Fulishima. Why would you put a nuclear reactor on an island, in a tsunami zone, on top of a fault line? Then there are wind turbines, beautiful pieces of engineering, that only spin, 300' white towers among a background of green grass and a clear blue sky. Put 'em up fellas. They create jobs, like building the highways did during the Great Depression. It's one of the smartest infrastructure moves we could make. I helped build a substation in Enid, Oklahoma that delivered power to northern Alabama, the Chisolm View Wind Project. Put 'em up and keep Americans working.
 
2013-08-21 01:13:07 AM  

Not_Todd: Wasn't it Ted Kennedy who led the lawsuit to prevent wind turbines within sight of his estate?

Without tax breaks and subsidies, very few of these things can even break even.


Both wind and solar are getting cheaper by the day, thanks in large part to the subsidies which made it profitable to do the research and technology development necessary to make the industry profitable.  Which is kind of the point.
 
2013-08-21 01:14:27 AM  

BLayingBeads: Why would you put a nuclear reactor on an island, in a tsunami zone, on top of a fault line?


Because it's Japan and you don't really have a choice.
 
2013-08-21 01:15:59 AM  
He's making common cause with Ted Kennedy.
 
2013-08-21 01:17:35 AM  
This is what a walking, talking scumbag looks like:
thinkprogress.org

"Oh no, don't cut the huge subsidies on our dirty energy ... our profits are not quite obscene yet!! Cut the tiny subsidies on the clean energy!!"
 
2013-08-21 01:17:52 AM  
Stupid sexy derricks!
 
2013-08-21 01:21:16 AM  

Mentat: BLayingBeads: Why would you put a nuclear reactor on an island, in a tsunami zone, on top of a fault line?

Because it's Japan and you don't really have a choice.


There's always a choice. Ride horses and bicycles, or face a third nuclear disaster. Now don't you go starting a flame war about the US of A causing the first two. So anyway, did you see AROD being hit by a pitch the other night? That was something, eh?!
 
2013-08-21 01:23:15 AM  
I dunno.  Wind turbines can look pretty elegant.
 
2013-08-21 01:30:18 AM  
This what rich people tell themselves so they can sleep at night.

His answer is textbook projective self-deluding denial. I bet he's a fan of Ayn Rand too.
 
2013-08-21 01:34:48 AM  
This is what you say when you don't have any legitimate arguments. Literally 99% of all man made structures are uglier than wind turbines, they're just giant pinwheels for fark's sake!
 
2013-08-21 01:36:00 AM  
While arguing against wind energy tax credits, Hamm cast special treatment for oil giants as fair, because they help propel his company's earnings.

Wow. Just wow. It's like the ultimate expression of "I got mine, fark you."
 
2013-08-21 01:37:51 AM  
The cool thing about oil derricks is that when you shoot at them they blow up.
 
2013-08-21 01:38:22 AM  
The US energy plan after Jimmy Carter became "steal as much as you can".  It's sad to think of all the energy that will be wasted as the fight for Middle East oil and gas really shifts into high gear.  But the US and oil companies won't adjust strategy to renewables because if it ain't broke don't fix it.  And trillions in sunk costs.

The US should print up the last few trillions of its worthless paper and start a Manhattan Project of renewable energy.  Solar, wind, a little smart nuclear, and a lot of biomass oil.  It would create millions of permanent jobs and paired with some energy conservation could realistically make the US energy independent.  And the environment would be saved before fracking really farks it up beyond the point of no return.

But the greatest threat to national security is energy dependence so the military would get bored.  There are plenty of other brown-skinned countries to plunder, those Muslims tend to get so radical anyways.  It's hardly worth the trouble anymore.
 
2013-08-21 01:44:13 AM  
It's Oklahoma. What majestic mountain range are they blocking?
 
2013-08-21 01:54:10 AM  
when I was a kid there were still tons of old windmills everywhere...falling down, mostly. all I could think of was that the wind is free and in iowa it blows most of the time (the wind, dummy). I just wish I saw more smaller, home versions instead of the mid american monstrosities out along Interstate 80. 'cause birds, mostly.

cdn.theatlantic.com
 
2013-08-21 02:03:53 AM  
wwwhhhhaaattt? I like it how the wolves don't even need the sheep's clothing anymore.

 I woke up from a nightmare! I HAD SOLAR PANELS ON MY ROOF! MY neighbor had a Prius! *faints*
 
2013-08-21 02:05:08 AM  

Rand's lacy underwear: embracing clean energy, which is popular even among Republican voters.

it's not popular among any voters when you get more specific than "clean energy," specific like "more expensive energy." Grownup decisions don't sell.


In Québec, where I live, everybody is opposed to any project involving fossil fuels, whether it's fracking for shale gas, digging for oil, building a natural gas terminal, or repurposing an existing pipeline, people will loudly demonstrate against it. Everybody insists we should concentrate on clean, renewable energy.  The paradox is that as soon as a project involving clean, renewable energy is announced, whether it's a new hydro dam, or a wind farm, there are citizen groups that form to loudly demonstrate against it.

If the world could be made to run on magic pixie dust, someone would oppose the production of magic pixie dust.
 
2013-08-21 02:06:02 AM  

HawgWild: Oh yeah, baby, take it!

[www.gifmania.co.uk image 130x100]

Oh, gonna blow!

[www.gifmania.co.uk image 120x120]

Mmmm ... that's good lovin', baby.


Fark is not your personal oilrotica site...
 
2013-08-21 02:12:11 AM  

Rand's lacy underwear: it's not popular among any voters when you get more specific than "clean energy," specific like "more expensive energy."


That's because clean energy is much cheaper than the alternatives like coal and gas. We just subsidize the cost of those industries by not forcing them to pay for the costs associated with their pollution, like the damages to public health and global climate change. When you put clean energy at such an enormous disadvantage, of course it's going to be unpopular. It's like subsidizing cheap corn and then being surprised that people consume too much HFCS.
 
2013-08-21 02:14:40 AM  

stilted: There are three large wind farms around where I live in NW Oklahoma. It's a major industry in the area.

/Oil industry is booming, too.
//There's room for both.


It's all fun and games until that first massive windspill. As a Floridian, I have experienced these. Both during hurricane season and election season. Where will your T.Boone Pickens be then, Oklahoma?  Hmmmmm?
 
2013-08-21 02:16:08 AM  

Omahawg: when I was a kid there were still tons of old windmills everywhere...falling down, mostly. all I could think of was that the wind is free and in iowa it blows most of the time (the wind, dummy). I just wish I saw more smaller, home versions instead of the mid american monstrosities out along Interstate 80. 'cause birds, mostly.

[cdn.theatlantic.com image 600x334]


Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I guess.

/love wind turbines. Their large, slow-turning blades make me feel zen.
 
2013-08-21 02:19:11 AM  
wind/solar/fossil fuel systems work if you happen to be pissed off enough at your rural power company to build your own wind generator/mast/blades.  Otherwise they take too long to pay for themselves.  If you build your own, you can claim retail value for it and get that sweet tax credit that covers your materials, time and...just materials and time, thats all. ;)
 
2013-08-21 02:21:20 AM  

corq: stilted: There are three large wind farms around where I live in NW Oklahoma. It's a major industry in the area.

/Oil industry is booming, too.
//There's room for both.

It's all fun and games until that first massive windspill. As a Floridian, I have experienced these. Both during hurricane season and election season. Where will your T.Boone Pickens be then, Oklahoma?  Hmmmmm?


He'll be fine cause he owns the powerlines, doesnt matter how you make the juice, you gotta rent his straw to drink it.
 
2013-08-21 02:44:31 AM  

Captain James T. Smirk: nmrsnr: Well, yeah, windmills just spin around, while oil derricks just keep pumping in and out, in and out. Thrusting into the Earth, penetrating deep into the crust, pumping, always pumping...

I'm sorry, is it hot in here?

[imgs.xkcd.com image 697x264]


imgs.xkcd.com

I like this one better
 
2013-08-21 02:56:37 AM  

Not_Todd: Wasn't it Ted Kennedy who led the lawsuit to prevent wind turbines within sight of his estate?


Off the coast of Hyannis Port, yes.  But Ted's dead so he's not leading much of anything anymore.

/never sure what the point of bringing Ted Kennedy up in every wind turbine thread is.
//If he'd actually managed to get the project quashed I'd have a different opinion.
///but he didn't.
 
2013-08-21 02:57:32 AM  

fusillade762: While arguing against wind energy tax credits, Hamm cast special treatment for oil giants as fair, because they help propel his company's earnings.

Wow. Just wow. It's like the ultimate expression of "I got mine, fark you."


That can't be a direct quote.  It just can't.
 
2013-08-21 02:59:08 AM  

capt.hollister: The paradox is that as soon as a project involving clean, renewable energy is announced, whether it's a new hydro dam, or a wind farm, there are citizen groups that form to loudly demonstrate against it.


That sounds like the same stories I hear from my aunts and uncles in "hippie" "green" Vermont. A wind farm is proposed on a hillside and the NIMBYS and die-hard environmentalists come out in droves to protest and shut it down.
 
2013-08-21 03:03:42 AM  

Omahawg: when I was a kid there were still tons of old windmills everywhere...falling down, mostly. all I could think of was that the wind is free and in iowa it blows most of the time (the wind, dummy). I just wish I saw more smaller, home versions instead of the mid american monstrosities out along Interstate 80. 'cause birds, mostly.

[cdn.theatlantic.com image 600x334]


The bird-killing deal is way oversold by critics.  WAY oversold.  Avian studies are done as part of every windfarm.  Turbines are not placed in migratory routes or in the habitats of endangered species.  Modern wind turbines do kill some birds, yes, but not are certainly not the tweety cuisinarts that critics make them out to be.

Your kitchen window kills more birds than an average windmill.
 
2013-08-21 03:07:51 AM  

germ78: capt.hollister: The paradox is that as soon as a project involving clean, renewable energy is announced, whether it's a new hydro dam, or a wind farm, there are citizen groups that form to loudly demonstrate against it.

That sounds like the same stories I hear from my aunts and uncles in "hippie" "green" Vermont. A wind farm is proposed on a hillside and the NIMBYS and die-hard environmentalists come out in droves to protest and shut it down.


I have worked on coal plants, gas plants, nukes, dams, biomass, solar, you name it.  There are always NIMBYs and protesters.

But nothing--NOTHING--brings out the hate like windmills.  I have seen death threats, shots fired, riots, and more when windmills are involved.  Coal plants bring out the enviro-lawyers.  Windmills bring out the inner NIMBY in everyone.  It is absolutely surreal.
 
2013-08-21 03:10:16 AM  
One of the few PBS stations I can get on my satellite system is OETA, Oklahoma PBS. They are actually proud to have a fully Republican House, Senate, and Governor. Plus both their Senators and all of their house members are Republicans.

Their latest brilliant ploy is to eliminate their income tax.

The stupid with these people just burns.

I do love the OETA movie club, but watching their local talk shows with brain dead idiots like Dick Pryor fellating Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh makes me glad tornadoes blow through them on a fairly regular basis.
 
Displayed 50 of 105 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report