If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Slate)   Millions of Americans watch porn, but researchers have yet to do a comprehensive study on the genre, presumably because they can't get through more than 15 minutes of a film without needing to recharge   (slate.com) divider line 43
    More: Obvious, Americans, Pasadena City College, Hugo Schwyzer, sex industry  
•       •       •

2750 clicks; posted to Main » on 17 Aug 2013 at 2:42 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



43 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2013-08-17 11:42:36 AM
News Flash. The amount of brain power it takes to find a way to make people pay you for something you'd do for free is a very rare gift.

Any way if you really wanted a class about pornography why wouldn't you just hire a porn star as an adjunct professor?
 
2013-08-17 01:47:10 PM
www.slate.com

Are those VHS boxes?
 
2013-08-17 01:50:40 PM
I think that can safely be edited to say "hundreds of millions."
 
2013-08-17 02:04:54 PM
15 minutes? I'm done in about 15 seconds, depending on how many times I have to click past the oral and anal scenes.
 
2013-08-17 02:43:46 PM
Just some jerk quirks.
 
2013-08-17 02:44:34 PM
Conversely, tens of Americans don't watch porn.
 
2013-08-17 02:45:39 PM
I have a Fark Fetish.
 
2013-08-17 02:47:00 PM

Sybarite: [www.slate.com image 568x346]

Are those VHS boxes?


Remarkable, isn't it?  There used to be a time where people had to go to a store to get porn.
 
2013-08-17 02:49:01 PM
Why bother studying  people who watch porn? It would be like studying people looking at themselves in a mirror. And that's what porn is ... an exceptionally idealized mirror. ("Boy, I wish I were that guy / girl / Labrador retriever.")
 
2013-08-17 02:53:25 PM
They should just ask all the streaming porn sites how many unique visitors they get each month.
 
2013-08-17 02:54:13 PM
Just give me a few minutes of amateur interracial cuck action. Them its nap time.
 
2013-08-17 02:55:01 PM

The Stealth Hippopotamus: Any way if you really wanted a class about pornography why wouldn't you just hire a porn star as an adjunct professor?


Because a porn star would only be able to provide anecdotal experience.

Which is really the gist of this artlice. What one person experiences is not necessarily reflective of the whole industry.
 
2013-08-17 02:56:12 PM

jaylectricity: 15 minutes? I'm done in about 15 seconds, depending on how many times I have to click past the oral and anal scenes.

...

i.qkme.me


http://i.qkme.me/52r3.jpg
 
2013-08-17 03:00:38 PM
It's simple.  I'm not a complicated man.  I like cinema, in particular I like to see people farking on film.  And I don't want an Oscar or reinvent the wheel.  I like simple pleasures like butter in my arse and lolipops in my mouth, that's just me.  That's just something I enjoy, call me crazy, call me a pervert, but there's one little thing I want to do in life and that is I wanna make a dollar and a cent in this business.
/wasnt' much different in the 70's
 
2013-08-17 03:04:27 PM
I'm sure there have been lots of studies on porn.  They just take longer to write when you're typing with one hand.
 
2013-08-17 03:04:39 PM
jaylectricity: 15 minutes? I'm done in about 15 seconds, depending on how many times I have to click past the oral and anal scenes.

// I should write some software to automatically skip or cut those scenes, I'll be rich.
 
2013-08-17 03:06:35 PM
Teach students about porn? What the hell would that class be about? Best camera angles?

/Is it the new underwater basket weaving class?
 
2013-08-17 03:08:40 PM

lordargent: jaylectricity: 15 minutes? I'm done in about 15 seconds, depending on how many times I have to click past the oral and anal scenes.

// I should write some software to automatically skip or cut those scenes, I'll be rich.


Ive been using porn.com a lot lately, not only is their category selection thing awesome (although i wish there was a subtractive option), a lot of newer videos are subdivided underneath the video progress bar by sex act.
 
2013-08-17 03:15:33 PM

lordargent: jaylectricity: 15 minutes? I'm done in about 15 seconds, depending on how many times I have to click past the oral and anal scenes.

// I should write some software to automatically skip or cut those scenes, I'll be rich.


I don't mind the oral scenes so much, but really... does every scene have to include anal?  I like amateur porn.  watching people fark simply because they love it and want to.  No fake noises, 15 different positions, fake orgasms.  Amateur porn is simple and authentic.  I don't mean the amateur kind with some girl picked up off the beach and brought to a hotel room with lots of lights, etc.  I mean the real homemade stuff that people film themselves
 
2013-08-17 03:19:20 PM

airplane_mech2: lordargent: jaylectricity: 15 minutes? I'm done in about 15 seconds, depending on how many times I have to click past the oral and anal scenes.

// I should write some software to automatically skip or cut those scenes, I'll be rich.

I don't mind the oral scenes so much, but really... does every scene have to include anal?  I like amateur porn.  watching people fark simply because they love it and want to.  No fake noises, 15 different positions, fake orgasms.  Amateur porn is simple and authentic.  I don't mean the amateur kind with some girl picked up off the beach and brought to a hotel room with lots of lights, etc.  I mean the real homemade stuff that people film themselves


And I thank them very much for uploading It to the Internet for me to view.
 
2013-08-17 03:22:01 PM
I like to watch.
 
2013-08-17 03:25:12 PM
I did some of the first Internet porn research (pre-www). No matter what your findings are, someone will be pissed at you. And a lot of people will quote your study incorrectly.
 
2013-08-17 03:25:18 PM
I forgot to add the jerk off facial.  Who came up with this crap?  Another reason I like amateur stuff.  Sex doesn't always end with a big load in your womans eyes or up her nose.
 
2013-08-17 03:25:26 PM
See, this article sort of highlights one of the problems that I have when attempting to do a little pipe-cleaning: porn doesn't have that personal factor. Good sex is fun because you're taking a person you already know, and interacting in a sexual context. Good sex is communicative. In porn, there really isn't a personal prior context; if they even bother to set up a backstory, it's still usually just a minute and a half of "just because I'm dating your dad doesn't mean we can't fool around," after which they unceremoniously plug in and start making honking noises. Once they get started, they basically never talk again. Heck, half the time the actors never even make eye contact. It's very easy to reach the point where most of what's out there isn't even titillating anymore.

For this reason, the 'ol imagination frequently gets the job done a lot better, especially when fueled by your previous experiences. You can dredge up memories of that girl you knew in college who brushed you off for two semesters before she made the mistake of sleeping with you once while drunk then later denied it, or your girlfriend from grad school who dated you for a couple years and promised she'd always be there for you shortly before dumping you for being insufficiently religious. You can call back the way the her forearms broke out in goosebumps when you hit just the right spot, the salty taste of the skin on her neck, and the way her hair smelled when that herbal stuff she used started to mix with just a touch of sweat. Between the sensory information and latent attachment, a good imagination lets you take care of business in a way that a purely visual medium just can't.

...Or at least, it did for me, before my fantasies started getting...well, existential.

It's a problem I've been having lately. My imaginary boot-knocking sessions always start out innocuously enough: I make some sort of joke to the object of my affection as she takes of her bra to try and keep things light, or I tenderly caress her hair and mention another time we fooled around in a similar fashion. She then goes to respond, and before you know it, I sense acute concern growing behind her eyes: She realizes she can't remember any event I wasn't a part of, or any segment of her past that she hasn't told me about. Things like the house she grew up in, the name of her first grade teacher...heck, how she got to my apartment for this [imaginary] romp in the first place all exist as blank spots in her mind. The concern rapidly builds to fear, then, inevitably, into shock and disgust as she realizes the terrible truth: That she's not a real person, just a projection of my twisted consciousness based on a real person, and that the only reason she exists at all is for my own selfish gratification.

The realization that I'm a tyrannical, god-like sexual deviant generally kills the mood for her, so at that point I'll usually try to back the fantasy up to a point before my imaginary lover has her solipsistic epiphany, but of course I'm still thinking along those lines, so the damage has already been done. After a few more sessions where my projected paramour has a dramatic existential crisis before we actually start copulating, I'm usually pretty desperate to get off, so I'll slip up insinuate that she's not the first mental simulation of an old girlfriend that I've had to shut off after she figured out what was going on.

This, of course, leads to more shock and disgust, but eventually the end result is always the same: With tears of rage and despair streaming down her face, she climbs on, knowing that as soon as I'm finished, I'll stop thinking about her and she'll cease to exist.

I gotta say, crap like this is making porn seem like a much better option again...
 
2013-08-17 03:26:23 PM

unyon: Sybarite: [www.slate.com image 568x346]

Are those VHS boxes?

Remarkable, isn't it?  There used to be a time where people had to go to a store to get porn TV shows and movies.


FTFY.

/rented a VHS porno the weekend I turned 18, just because I could.
 
2013-08-17 03:29:08 PM

airplane_mech2: I don't mind the oral scenes so much, but really... does every scene have to include anal? I like amateur porn. watching people fark simply because they love it and want to. No fake noises, 15 different positions, fake orgasms. Amateur porn is simple and authentic. I don't mean the amateur kind with some girl picked up off the beach and brought to a hotel room with lots of lights, etc. I mean the real homemade stuff that people film themselves


You know what - THIS. It's far more real, you can see life in their eyes and passion. And, you don't run so much risk of your fantasies diverging from attainable reality since they're not porn stars - they literally are the "girl next door" so to speak.
 
2013-08-17 03:33:53 PM

Sgygus: I like to watch.


Pornography, is a state of mind.
 
2013-08-17 03:41:01 PM

Martian_Astronomer: See, this article sort of highlights one of the problems that I have when attempting to do a little pipe-cleaning: porn doesn't have that personal factor. Good sex is fun because you're taking a person you already know, and interacting in a sexual context. Good sex is communicative. In porn, there really isn't a personal prior context; if they even bother to set up a backstory, it's still usually just a minute and a half of "just because I'm dating your dad doesn't mean we can't fool around," after which they unceremoniously plug in and start making honking noises. Once they get started, they basically never talk again. Heck, half the time the actors never even make eye contact. It's very easy to reach the point where most of what's out there isn't even titillating anymore.

For this reason, the 'ol imagination frequently gets the job done a lot better, especially when fueled by your previous experiences. You can dredge up memories of that girl you knew in college who brushed you off for two semesters before she made the mistake of sleeping with you once while drunk then later denied it, or your girlfriend from grad school who dated you for a couple years and promised she'd always be there for you shortly before dumping you for being insufficiently religious. You can call back the way the her forearms broke out in goosebumps when you hit just the right spot, the salty taste of the skin on her neck, and the way her hair smelled when that herbal stuff she used started to mix with just a touch of sweat. Between the sensory information and latent attachment, a good imagination lets you take care of business in a way that a purely visual medium just can't.

...Or at least, it did for me, before my fantasies started getting...well, existential.

It's a problem I've been having lately. My imaginary boot-knocking sessions always start out innocuously enough: I make some sort of joke to the object of my affection as she takes of her bra to try and keep things light, or I ten ...


24.media.tumblr.com
 
2013-08-17 04:04:52 PM
Been there, done that:

The commission's report, called Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, and published in 1970, recommended sex education, funding of research into the effects of pornography and restriction of children's access to pornography, and recommended against any restrictions for adults. On balance the report found that obscenity and pornography were not important social problems, that there was no evidence that exposure to such material was harmful to individuals, and that current legal and policy initiatives were more likely to create problems than solve them.[1] The report was widely criticized and rejected by Congress.[1] The Senate rejected the commission's findings and recommendations by a 60-5 vote, with 34 abstentions.[2] The senate rejected the following findings and recommendations in particular;[2]
That there was "no evidence to date that exposure to explicit sexual materials plays a significant role in the causation of delinquent or criminal behavior among youths or adults."
That "a majority of American adults believe that adults should be allowed to read or see any sexual materials they wish."
That "there is no reason to suppose that elimination of governmental prohibitions upon the sexual materials which may be made available to adults would adversely affect the availability to the public of other books, magazines, or films."
That there was no "evidence that exposure to explicit sexual materials adversely affects character or moral attitudes regarding sex and sexual conduct."
That "Federal, State, and Local legislation prohibiting the sale, exhibition, or distribution of sexual materials to consenting adults should be repealed."
President Richard Nixon, who had succeeded Johnson in 1969, also emphatically rejected the report.[3]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President's_Commission_on_Obscenity_an d_Pornography  (link seems to be filter-owned)

Nixon's response:   http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=2759   (it is interesting to note that Nixon jammed Charles Keating onto the Commission - of S&L infamy -  he wrote his own rebuttal):

Reagan then ran his own Commission through his AG, Ed Meese.  Of course, there was only one conclusion:
A comparison of the research methods used by each Commission:   http://web.cci.utk.edu/~bates/papers/aapor87-popc.pdf

Maybe update on the contribution of technological advances in the decrease of angst/time associated with acquiring and displaying desired material

/Bible Beaters still can't get their load to stick to their, unencumbered, fellow citizen's faces (though their interminable shiat spray does have to be rinsed from one's hair, on occasion)
 
2013-08-17 04:06:46 PM

The Stealth Hippopotamus: News Flash. The amount of brain power it takes to find a way to make people pay you for something you'd do for free is a very rare gift.

Any way if you really wanted a class about pornography why wouldn't you just hire a porn star as an adjunct professor?


Why would you bother hiring them? There is an over-abundance of cum-guzzling sluts here in Florida that will do it for free.
 
2013-08-17 04:08:49 PM

Martian_Astronomer: See, this article sort of highlights one of the problems that I have when attempting to do a little pipe-cleaning: porn doesn't have that personal factor. Good sex is fun because you're taking a person you already know, and interacting in a sexual context. Good sex is communicative. In porn, there really isn't a personal prior context; if they even bother to set up a backstory, it's still usually just a minute and a half of "just because I'm dating your dad doesn't mean we can't fool around," after which they unceremoniously plug in and start making honking noises. Once they get started, they basically never talk again. Heck, half the time the actors never even make eye contact. It's very easy to reach the point where most of what's out there isn't even titillating anymore.

For this reason, the 'ol imagination frequently gets the job done a lot better, especially when fueled by your previous experiences. You can dredge up memories of that girl you knew in college who brushed you off for two semesters before she made the mistake of sleeping with you once while drunk then later denied it, or your girlfriend from grad school who dated you for a couple years and promised she'd always be there for you shortly before dumping you for being insufficiently religious. You can call back the way the her forearms broke out in goosebumps when you hit just the right spot, the salty taste of the skin on her neck, and the way her hair smelled when that herbal stuff she used started to mix with just a touch of sweat. Between the sensory information and latent attachment, a good imagination lets you take care of business in a way that a purely visual medium just can't.

...Or at least, it did for me, before my fantasies started getting...well, existential.

It's a problem I've been having lately. My imaginary boot-knocking sessions always start out innocuously enough: I make some sort of joke to the object of my affection as she takes of her bra to try and keep things light, or I ten ...


Should have made her put on the paper bag
 
2013-08-17 04:10:26 PM

martid4: The Stealth Hippopotamus: News Flash. The amount of brain power it takes to find a way to make people pay you for something you'd do for free is a very rare gift.

Any way if you really wanted a class about pornography why wouldn't you just hire a porn star as an adjunct professor?

Why would you bother hiring them? There is an over-abundance of cum-guzzling sluts here in Florida that will do it for free.


Because if you want something done right you need to pay a professional to do it
 
2013-08-17 04:20:50 PM

Somaticasual: airplane_mech2: I don't mind the oral scenes so much, but really... does every scene have to include anal? I like amateur porn. watching people fark simply because they love it and want to. No fake noises, 15 different positions, fake orgasms. Amateur porn is simple and authentic. I don't mean the amateur kind with some girl picked up off the beach and brought to a hotel room with lots of lights, etc. I mean the real homemade stuff that people film themselves

You know what - THIS. It's far more real, you can see life in their eyes and passion. And, you don't run so much risk of your fantasies diverging from attainable reality since they're not porn stars - they literally are the "girl next door" so to speak.


I don't really give enough of a shiat to search far and wide, but I've yet to see any satisfying amateur video porn. (Stills are a different matter.)  In my experience, amateur stuff boils down to this:

1. Legitimate-seeming happy amateur couples recording themselves in their dorm or apartment, but the camera is sitting on a dresser or something and all you see is their backs from 10+ feet away, and there's shiatty pop/hip-hop musing playing from a stereo in the room. Or one of them is holding the camera but (understandably) doing a terrible job of aiming it correctly.

2. Scenes in a motel room with a dedicated camera-person, but that right away makes it seem like a really pathetic attempt at a professional production, obviously not one of the big studios. Plus I see no reason to believe the chick isn't actually a paid hooker.

2a. Scenes like #2, but while still hosted on a maintsream tube site, there's a bothersome snuff quality to it. I can't fap to these, and instead end up analyzing them like a poor man's FBI agent. No the chick isn't kicking and screaming, but she kind of seems out of it (possibly high or very drunk) and never talks clearly.  I figure at best these are drug-addicted prostitutes, if not much worse (especially considering what's possible overseas), and I can't imagine they're being paid enough for something like an unprotected gangbang to be worth it. I don't know what's more naive--thinking that there aren't women who would happily engage in that activity, or thinking that there are.

So, what/where is this quality amateur porn you speak of? I just can't fathom it based on what I've seen.
 
2013-08-17 04:45:51 PM

airplane_mech2: I don't mind the oral scenes so much, but really... does every scene have to include anal?  I like amateur porn.  watching people fark simply because they love it and want to.  No fake noises, 15 different positions, fake orgasms.  Amateur porn is simple and authentic.


A lot of big $$$ pr0n is really awful, kinda misogynistic, demeaning stuff IMO. It's painful to see people subject themselves to that in front of a camera.  I don't see the appeal to it at all, or maybe I'm just not that much of a sadist.
 
2013-08-17 04:59:18 PM

Yankees Team Gynecologist: Somaticasual: airplane_mech2: I don't mind the oral scenes so much, but really... does every scene have to include anal? I like amateur porn. watching people fark simply because they love it and want to. No fake noises, 15 different positions, fake orgasms. Amateur porn is simple and authentic. I don't mean the amateur kind with some girl picked up off the beach and brought to a hotel room with lots of lights, etc. I mean the real homemade stuff that people film themselves

You know what - THIS. It's far more real, you can see life in their eyes and passion. And, you don't run so much risk of your fantasies diverging from attainable reality since they're not porn stars - they literally are the "girl next door" so to speak.

I don't really give enough of a shiat to search far and wide, but I've yet to see any satisfying amateur video porn. (Stills are a different matter.)  In my experience, amateur stuff boils down to this:

1. Legitimate-seeming happy amateur couples recording themselves in their dorm or apartment, but the camera is sitting on a dresser or something and all you see is their backs from 10+ feet away, and there's shiatty pop/hip-hop musing playing from a stereo in the room. Or one of them is holding the camera but (understandably) doing a terrible job of aiming it correctly.

2. Scenes in a motel room with a dedicated camera-person, but that right away makes it seem like a really pathetic attempt at a professional production, obviously not one of the big studios. Plus I see no reason to believe the chick isn't actually a paid hooker.

2a. Scenes like #2, but while still hosted on a maintsream tube site, there's a bothersome snuff quality to it. I can't fap to these, and instead end up analyzing them like a poor man's FBI agent. No the chick isn't kicking and screaming, but she kind of seems out of it (possibly high or very drunk) and never talks clearly.  I figure at best these are drug-addicted prostitutes, if not much worse (especially considering w ...


We may have differing definitions on "amateur" in that case. I tend to call anything not produced by one of the big companies "amateur" because it's a big leagues game in porn. I don't just mean "POV" porn where one partner holds the camera, but basically everything up to and including "2 friends and a camera guy". You can stage relatively professional lighting at the amateur level, so that would include sites like Beeg for instance - still HD, but there's no fluffer and the ratio of fake "blond bombshell" types is way down.

Have to concede that most "POV" style scenes are definitely in your three categories...
 
2013-08-17 05:03:05 PM

Yankees Team Gynecologist: Somaticasual: airplane_mech2: I don't mind the oral scenes so much, but really... does every scene have to include anal? I like amateur porn. watching people fark simply because they love it and want to. No fake noises, 15 different positions, fake orgasms. Amateur porn is simple and authentic. I don't mean the amateur kind with some girl picked up off the beach and brought to a hotel room with lots of lights, etc. I mean the real homemade stuff that people film themselves

You know what - THIS. It's far more real, you can see life in their eyes and passion. And, you don't run so much risk of your fantasies diverging from attainable reality since they're not porn stars - they literally are the "girl next door" so to speak.

I don't really give enough of a shiat to search far and wide, but I've yet to see any satisfying amateur video porn. (Stills are a different matter.)  In my experience, amateur stuff boils down to this:

1. Legitimate-seeming happy amateur couples recording themselves in their dorm or apartment, but the camera is sitting on a dresser or something and all you see is their backs from 10+ feet away, and there's shiatty pop/hip-hop musing playing from a stereo in the room. Or one of them is holding the camera but (understandably) doing a terrible job of aiming it correctly.

2. Scenes in a motel room with a dedicated camera-person, but that right away makes it seem like a really pathetic attempt at a professional production, obviously not one of the big studios. Plus I see no reason to believe the chick isn't actually a paid hooker.

2a. Scenes like #2, but while still hosted on a maintsream tube site, there's a bothersome snuff quality to it. I can't fap to these, and instead end up analyzing them like a poor man's FBI agent. No the chick isn't kicking and screaming, but she kind of seems out of it (possibly high or very drunk) and never talks clearly.  I figure at best these are drug-addicted prostitutes, if not much worse (especially considering w ...


I totally understand what you're saying.  There really isn't a lot of real authentic stuff out there that isn't essentially crap.  But, much as I have experienced in the dating world, it's a numbers game.  You got to sift through a lot of crap to find something good (which, by the way I still haven't been able to do yet, but I digress).  Here are the sites I mostly use.  Mostly ad minimal and rare misdirects.  I find good stuff at all of these sites, but I guess it's subjective.
submityourflicks.com
submityourtapes.com
ixxx.com
xnxx.com
dinotube.com
wanktube.com

I don't know if I'm allowed to list these or not, but there ya go.
 
2013-08-17 05:26:50 PM

airplane_mech2: I forgot to add the jerk off facial.  Who came up with this crap?  Another reason I like amateur stuff.  Sex doesn't always end with a big load in your womans eyes or up her nose.


The best sex does not have a woman in it, never once had a guy blow his load on my face and its rude not to swallow every drop
 
2013-08-17 05:28:40 PM

airplane_mech2: lordargent: jaylectricity: 15 minutes? I'm done in about 15 seconds, depending on how many times I have to click past the oral and anal scenes.

// I should write some software to automatically skip or cut those scenes, I'll be rich.

I don't mind the oral scenes so much, but really... does every scene have to include anal?  I like amateur porn.  watching people fark simply because they love it and want to.  No fake noises, 15 different positions, fake orgasms.  Amateur porn is simple and authentic.  I don't mean the amateur kind with some girl picked up off the beach and brought to a hotel room with lots of lights, etc.  I mean the real homemade stuff that people film themselves


I prefer those as well bc I only look at them for tips on home decor
 
2013-08-17 05:34:47 PM

lordargent: jaylectricity: 15 minutes? I'm done in about 15 seconds, depending on how many times I have to click past the oral and anal scenes.

// I should write some software to automatically skip or cut those scenes, I'll be rich.


CSB:
I used to work for a subtitling company, and one of the things we'd have to subtitle was porn.*  I used to like working on the porn movies during an overnight shift. Not because of any fap factor, but because the workflow was essentially dubbing the videotapes with the subtitle computer between the player and recorder, so you'd have to do each program in real time. First of all, there would be a couple minutes of talking followed by 15-20 of farking, then another short bit of talking followed by more farking, etc. etc. So there wasn't that much dialog to worry about. (Every so often you'd get a "Yes, yes" or "ohhh" that would be subtitled. Why? Fark if I know!) Second, and more importantly, nobody really gave a shiat if the dub was correct or not as long as it was there. IE, they were never checked. So I could start the tapes and take a nap for the next hour plus. You have two or three of these in a shift, and you'd be paid for a good nights sleep. Yeah, porn isn't as much fun when it's work. And they were usually really cheap shiatty movies.

*Subtitling porn? Yes, you read right. These were meant for broadcast on Israeli Cable TV, and there is a law that says shows have to be subtitled, even shows originally in Hebrew. I was never sure if that was for the hard of hearing, or because there are so many citizens for whom Hebrew is not their first language.
 
2013-08-17 05:44:47 PM
An ambitious scientist at the University of Montreal, Canada intended to research how pornography influences how men perceive women, and in turn, affects their sexuality.  In order to do that he wanted to compare two distinct groups of men.The first would be a group of twenty-something males that had never seen porn before and the second group would be of twenty-something males that admit to viewing porn regularly.

Unfortunately the study was scrapped because he couldn't find a group of men in their twenties that hadn't watched porn.

Link
 
2013-08-17 07:28:31 PM

Sgygus: I like to watch.


i1214.photobucket.com I see what you did there.
 
2013-08-17 08:47:34 PM
Martian_Astronomer:

Okay, that was pretty awesome. Hope it was original.

*doffs TinyCap*
 
2013-08-18 01:09:29 AM

airplane_mech2: I don't mind the oral scenes so much, but really... does every scene have to include anal?


As far as the oral: I've never gotten a blowjob that lets me know why it's supposed to be this great thing. Most of the BJ's I've ever gotten were desperate attempts by a woman to feel like she could actively cause my erection and failing and giving up within 45 seconds of the start of her attempt.

As far as anal...yuck...poop is gross and I don't know why you'd want your most sterile body part to go in there.
 
Displayed 43 of 43 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report