If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Salon)   Missouri Republican decides that the best way to keep his daughter off of birth control is C) sue the federal government for allowing it to exist in the first place   (salon.com) divider line 223
    More: Dumbass, Missouri Republicans, Catholic Faith, Teresa  
•       •       •

3780 clicks; posted to Politics » on 15 Aug 2013 at 2:30 PM (47 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



223 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-08-15 04:13:53 PM

CheetahOlivetti: spongeboob: How did Catholicism get so big in Missouri?  This guy and your late governor who was elected posthumously to the Senate even after he commuted a death sentence under the orders of the pope.  I thought the midwest was made up of real Americans(Baptists, Methodists, Lutherans, Presbyterians and even the occasional Lutheran) and that Catholics were confined to Liberal Coast States?

Wait are Catholics real Christians this week, it is so hard to keep up.

It's probably like Kansas where there are little towns settled by people from the same region and religion. Like almost all the people in Ellis County, Kansas are Volga-German Catholics, but you go to SE Kansas, and it's Baptists everywhere.  My little town was pretty evenly split amongst the Catholics, the Methodists, and the Lutherans. The Methodists and Lutherans would mix, but they only hung out with the Catholics because they had all the beer.


If they are German you know they are going to have good beer and lots of it.
 
2013-08-15 04:14:48 PM

Diogenes: Changing federal laws to conform to your personal beliefs seems just like the type of small government solution this country is sorely lacking.


This.
 
2013-08-15 04:17:58 PM
mimg.ugo.com
 
2013-08-15 04:23:45 PM
Remember the folks that tried to outlaw circumcising babies? This guy is sort of like that.
 
2013-08-15 04:24:34 PM
I know it's been said a hundred times already but....

THEY DON'T HAVE TO TAKE IT, YOU 'TARD! Insurance just has to cover it if people WANT to take it!

Motherfarker, you'd think UN Jackboots were breaking into houses at night and forcing it down the throats of all women in the house, while their husbands/fathers could only screamin agony as they are forced to watch.
 
2013-08-15 04:28:26 PM

red5ish: Remember the folks that tried to outlaw circumcising babies? This guy is sort of like that.


This guy doesn't want his daughters to have birth control, because of religion.

The people who want to outlaw infant circumcision want to prevent babies from having their dicks farked around with as a result of their parents' religion.

The two aren't nearly the same.
 
2013-08-15 04:29:59 PM

red5ish: Remember the folks that tried to outlaw circumcising babies? This guy is sort of like that.


Um no. Not the same.
 
2013-08-15 04:32:49 PM

RodneyToady: red5ish: Remember the folks that tried to outlaw circumcising babies? This guy is sort of like that.

This guy doesn't want his daughters to have birth control, because of religion.

The people who want to outlaw infant circumcision want to prevent babies from having their dicks farked around with as a result of their parents' religion.

The two aren't nearly the same.


I guess we know where you come down on that issue.
 
2013-08-15 04:33:09 PM
That dude spends way too much time thinking about his daughters having sex.
 
2013-08-15 04:34:55 PM

give me doughnuts: That dude spends way too much time thinking about his daughters having sex.


And now he has a bunch of Farkers thinking about his daughters having sex.
 
2013-08-15 04:37:01 PM
I believe you are all missing the fact that if he is exempted from covering birth control, his insurance rates will be approximately eleventy billion dollars less.
 
2013-08-15 04:37:42 PM
"I see abortion-inducing drugs as intrinsically evil, and I cannot in good conscience preach one thing to my kids and then just go with the flow on our insurance," Wieland remarked. "This is a moral conundrum for me. Do I just cancel the coverage and put my family at risk? I don't believe in what the government is doing."

THEN DON'T FARKING USE THAT PART OF YOUR FARKING INSURANCE, YOU FAT, RETARDED ASSHOLE!


There is absolutely NOTHING in Obamacare that states that you HAVE to use any part of your farking insurance, you stupid farking loon.

/Did I remember to say 'Farking'?
 
2013-08-15 04:40:03 PM

Mikey1969: THEN DON'T FARKING USE THAT PART OF YOUR FARKING INSURANCE, YOU FAT, RETARDED ASSHOLE!


There is absolutely NOTHING in Obamacare that states that you HAVE to use any part of your farking insurance, you stupid farking loon.

/Did I remember to say 'Farking'?


But then he has to PAY for other WHORES to HAVE A GOOD TIME on HIS DOLLAR.
 
2013-08-15 04:42:45 PM

LeroyBourne: I'm thinking daddy found used condoms in their trash can.  My dad found mine when I was a teenager.  He yelled at me about the consequences and such.  My snarky response was 'FIIIIIIIINE DAD, I WON'T USE THEM AT ALL THEN!'
/kept using them of course


My foster dad decided my room was too messy and cleaned it one day. He found the empty condom boxes under the bed(Just the empty boxes), and called me in to yell at me. My foster brother had announced that he had gotten his girlfriend pregnant a week or two before, she was 16 at the time, and he was 17. While my foster dad is giving me the third degree, my foster sister's boyfriend(Who happened ro be in ther ewith me and my foster brother turned to my foster brother and said "Gee, I bet you kinda wished YOUR room looked this way right about now, eh?". I about lost my shiat while I was getting my ass chewed.
 
2013-08-15 04:47:47 PM
Hey, asshole, stop foisting your beliefs on your daughters. If you raised them right, they'll be able to make responsible decisions. Maybe you won't agree with them, but  you do not own your children's minds, so STFU.

And if they're underage, what the unholy fark are you complaining about? They can't get it without your permission anyway.
 
2013-08-15 04:48:09 PM

RodneyToady: red5ish: Remember the folks that tried to outlaw circumcising babies? This guy is sort of like that.

This guy doesn't want his daughters to have birth control, because of religion.

The people who want to outlaw infant circumcision want to prevent babies from having their dicks farked around with as a result of their parents' religion.

The two aren't nearly the same.


They both get crazy people freaking out on the Internet, so they're pretty much the same from this angle.
 
2013-08-15 04:54:45 PM
MRS. BLACKITT: Hmm. Well, why do they have so many children?

MR. BLACKITT: Because... every time they have sexual intercourse, they have to have a baby.

MRS. BLACKITT: But it's the same with us, Harry.

MR. BLACKITT: What do you mean?

MRS. BLACKITT: Well, I mean, we've got two children, and we've had sexual intercourse twice.

MR. BLACKITT: That's not the point. We could have it any time we wanted.

MRS. BLACKITT: Really?

MR. BLACKITT: Oh, yes, and, what's more, because we don't believe in all that Papist claptrap, we can take precautions.

MRS. BLACKITT: What, you mean... lock the door?
 
2013-08-15 04:56:27 PM

Weaver95: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: Someone should explain to him that, despite what his wife and daughters told him, women are not required to take birth control.

I don't think this guy thinks that far ahead. He has visions of his daughters dancing on a stripper pole or dressed up as a lesbian dominatrix and his brain melted down. Now he has to stop the entire world and make everyone conform to his religious views because he can't handle someone doing something he doesn't like.


Maybe he just listened to this and is taking it a little too far.
 
2013-08-15 04:57:11 PM
Another ballsy, bootstrappy move from the Party of Personal Responsibility!
 
2013-08-15 04:59:43 PM

Zeb Hesselgresser: dr_blasto: So, do they force him to buy contraceptive pills? When I was single, my insurance had coverage sections for pregnancy and birth. That didn't force me to grow a set of ovaries and a uterus, I simply didn't use that coverage.

How farking hard is it to just not buy something you don't like anyhow?

So you don't understand what coverage mandates are?


I wasn't aware that coverage mandates forced you to use said coverage, no.
 
2013-08-15 05:00:44 PM
Another example of the need for retroactive birth control.
 
2013-08-15 05:03:20 PM

spongeboob: RodneyToady: red5ish: Remember the folks that tried to outlaw circumcising babies? This guy is sort of like that.

This guy doesn't want his daughters to have birth control, because of religion.

The people who want to outlaw infant circumcision want to prevent babies from having their dicks farked around with as a result of their parents' religion.

The two aren't nearly the same.

I guess we know where you come down on that issue.


On the side of reason, apparently.
 
2013-08-15 05:05:12 PM

PsiChick: Hey, asshole, stop foisting your beliefs on your daughters. If you raised them right, they'll be able to make responsible decisions. Maybe you won't agree with them, but  you do not own your children's minds, so STFU.

And if they're underage, what the unholy fark are you complaining about? They can't get it without your permission anyway.


He's attempting the same magic incantation "Sovereign Citizens" try to get out of paying taxes by intentionally misunderstanding something.  Since the US government can't establish a religion, he'll claim something is against his religion therefore the government must not mandate it.  This is completely fantastical thinking, as the first amendment does not confer supremacy of religious dictates, and in fact makes any such arguments preposterous.  But it plays well with the dumbs in his district, so off he derps.

No established religion means religion has no place, no standing, not primacy in government regulations.

Unfortunately you can't outlaw stupidity - we'd all be in jail for various reasons.
 
2013-08-15 05:07:09 PM
Stupid to that degree should be fatal.  If you don't agree with birth control, then don't use that part of your insurance coverage.  Seems like an easy solution, but we are talking about a Republican, here....I'm surprised he can wipe his own ass without poking out an eye.
 
2013-08-15 05:07:32 PM

HeartBurnKid: Zeb Hesselgresser: dr_blasto: So, do they force him to buy contraceptive pills? When I was single, my insurance had coverage sections for pregnancy and birth. That didn't force me to grow a set of ovaries and a uterus, I simply didn't use that coverage.

How farking hard is it to just not buy something you don't like anyhow?

So you don't understand what coverage mandates are?

I wasn't aware that coverage mandates forced you to use said coverage, no.


It's true - I've been on chemotherapy for 14 years and I don't even have cancer.
 
2013-08-15 05:09:46 PM

MadHatter500: PsiChick: Hey, asshole, stop foisting your beliefs on your daughters. If you raised them right, they'll be able to make responsible decisions. Maybe you won't agree with them, but  you do not own your children's minds, so STFU.

And if they're underage, what the unholy fark are you complaining about? They can't get it without your permission anyway.

He's attempting the same magic incantation "Sovereign Citizens" try to get out of paying taxes by intentionally misunderstanding something.  Since the US government can't establish a religion, he'll claim something is against his religion therefore the government must not mandate it.  This is completely fantastical thinking, as the first amendment does not confer supremacy of religious dictates, and in fact makes any such arguments preposterous.  But it plays well with the dumbs in his district, so off he derps.

No established religion means religion has no place, no standing, not primacy in government regulations.

Unfortunately you can't outlaw stupidity - we'd all be in jail for various reasons.


You cannot outlaw stupidity, but we should consider helping stupid people by putting them in camps where they can concentrate on the hard work of not being stupid. Concentrating camps for short.
 
2013-08-15 05:10:06 PM

LeroyBourne: I'm thinking daddy found used condoms in their trash can.  My dad found mine when I was a teenager.  He yelled at me about the consequences and such.  My snarky response was 'FIIIIIIIINE DAD, I WON'T USE THEM AT ALL THEN!'
/kept using them of course


girltomom.com

"I learned about condoms from watching you!"
 
2013-08-15 05:12:52 PM
Insecure, much? If you brainwashed, er, instilled your values into your children they won't use teh ebil contraception anyway. But heaven forbid your daughters develop minds of their own and take control of their own bodies.
 
2013-08-15 05:19:32 PM
imageshack.us
 
2013-08-15 05:19:42 PM
"I see abortion-inducing drugs life ending guns as intrinsically evil, and I cannot in good conscience preach one thing to my kids and then just go with the flow on our insurance gun control laws. This is a moral conundrum for me. Do I just cancel the coverage let the NRA write the legislation and put my family at risk? I don't believe in what the government is doing."

If a Democrat put a passage together like this, how loud would this guy be yelling?
 
2013-08-15 05:25:18 PM

idsfa: [imageshack.us image 350x292]


LOL

I wonder who is intended to be the recipient of that cake Mom, Dad or Teen.
 
2013-08-15 05:28:47 PM

Isitoveryet: idsfa: [imageshack.us image 350x292]

LOL

I wonder who is intended to be the recipient of that cake Mom, Dad or Teen.


CSB:

My Ex has a daughter who, when the daughter was 16, let her 22 year old boyfriend move in. Baby in less than a year. She just let her 17 year old son's girlfriend move in. The kids we share together are 8 and 11, I am considering going for full custody. I am REALLY considering sending her a copy of pic.
 
2013-08-15 05:35:58 PM
I'll bet twenty zillion dollars he opposes sex ed in schools because it's up to the parents to teach kids about sex, not the government.
 
2013-08-15 05:40:12 PM
For Republicans, killing someone with a gun is A-OK.  Stopping someone with a rubber is against God's will.  They are just against birth control because they would rather kill unwanted babies who are stealing their car.

To paraphrase the NRA: the only way to stop someone who is pregnant is someone else with a gun.
 
2013-08-15 05:41:04 PM

jst3p: My Ex has a daughter who, when the daughter was 16, let her 22 year old boyfriend move in. Baby in less than a year. She just let her 17 year old son's girlfriend move in.


Sounds like she got grandmother hunger, whether she realized it or not.
 
2013-08-15 05:42:07 PM

jst3p: Isitoveryet: idsfa: [imageshack.us image 350x292]

LOL

I wonder who is intended to be the recipient of that cake Mom, Dad or Teen.

CSB:

My Ex has a daughter who, when the daughter was 16, let her 22 year old boyfriend move in. Baby in less than a year. She just let her 17 year old son's girlfriend move in. The kids we share together are 8 and 11, I am considering going for full custody. I am REALLY considering sending her a copy of pic.


oh my.

yeah, it would probably be in your (and your 8 & 11 yo) best interest for you to have full custody.

I don't know how i would take a cake like that, i might make light of the situation, i mean, that's the reality & i have some pretty sarcastic friends but then again, it may be the last straw type reaction where in i launch said cake at the closest target.
 
2013-08-15 05:44:00 PM

theorellior: jst3p: My Ex has a daughter who, when the daughter was 16, let her 22 year old boyfriend move in. Baby in less than a year. She just let her 17 year old son's girlfriend move in.

Sounds like she got grandmother hunger, whether she realized it or not.


My current theory is that she is sabotaging them. She was a teen mom and without going into detail still has a pretty rough life. If her kids are successful she will be jealous. She has a good heart, she just has really poor decision making skills, and does not seek advice from good sources most of the time.
 
2013-08-15 05:44:38 PM
I see the party of personal responsibility is at it again!
 
2013-08-15 05:50:57 PM
Tell him you can get knocked up on Facebook.  Maybe he'll ban it.
 
2013-08-15 05:51:48 PM
Maybe he should just tell his whore daughters to accept the bastard blessing God has graced them with
 
2013-08-15 06:01:47 PM

FloydA: "I see abortion-inducing drugs as intrinsically evil, and I cannot in good conscience preach one thing to my kids and then just go with the flow on our insurance,"

I see grandstanding, fat-assed, attention whore politicians who care more about their own bank accounts than their constituents or their country as "intrinsically evil."  What options do you recommend for me, Mr. Wieland?


This actually is a great quote. I've never understood the anti-abortion crowd's hatred of contraception, but apparently if this guy is representative of the group as a whole they just don't understand how contraception works. They think that contraceptives terminate pregnancies. It's all so clear now... they not contradictory, they're just stupid.

/or both
 
2013-08-15 06:10:00 PM

Grand_Moff_Joseph: Can the court direct bill the people of his district for the costs incurred by his asshattery?


There must be somewhere with sensible laws like that.
 
2013-08-15 06:11:15 PM

PrivateCaboose: RodneyToady: Easy solution: stop being Catholic.  An amazing number of us have.

Easier solution: be catholic and have protected premarital sex. An amazing number of us have.


I see the set up for an easy anal sex joke and I'll assume someone made it upthread.
/lol upthread
 
2013-08-15 06:11:28 PM

hobberwickey: I've never understood the anti-abortion crowd's hatred of contraception


They've been calling the pill and IUDs "abortificients" since the 90's at least.
 
2013-08-15 06:21:29 PM

jst3p: "I see abortion-inducing drugs as intrinsically evil, and I cannot in good conscience preach one thing to my kids and then just go with the flow on our insurance. "

Interesting, this is from his health insurance carrier.

"Coverage for contraceptives either at no charge or at the same level of deductible, coinsurance or copayment as any other drug. Contraceptives are defined as prescription drugs and devices approved by the FDA for use as a contraceptive. Coverage is not required for drugs and devices that are intended to induce abortion."
~Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan.

A republican Lying?


Hanlon's Razor. He's probably just stupid.
 
2013-08-15 06:24:23 PM
It's always amusingly ironic to see one of these disgusting fat farks that apparently have no problem with gluttony proclaim something as 'evil' and against their strongly held religious beliefs. I bet he gives the entire list of seven a strong run for its money. At least, metaphorically speaking.

/it's pretty sad when you have a BMI of
 
2013-08-15 07:32:16 PM

SpectroBoy: PrivateCaboose: RodneyToady: Easy solution: stop being Catholic.  An amazing number of us have.

Easier solution: be catholic and have protected premarital sex. An amazing number of us have.

If you are having sex outside of wedlock you are not a good catholic. Sorry to break it to you. the church is pretty clear on this point.

Catholicism defines chastity as the virtue that moderates the sexual appetite. Unmarried Catholics express chastity through. Sexual intercourse within marriage is considered chaste when it retains the twofold significance of union and procreation.

The pope(s) have spoken explicitly on this multiples times.

Or do you pick and choose which rules you follow?




Believing in the Nicene creed makes you a Catholic, not the hand waving the Pope does.
 
2013-08-15 07:48:49 PM

Peter von Nostrand: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Christ what an asshole Republican

FTFY


Same thing.
 
2013-08-15 08:21:36 PM

StoPPeRmobile: SpectroBoy: PrivateCaboose: RodneyToady: Easy solution: stop being Catholic.  An amazing number of us have.

Easier solution: be catholic and have protected premarital sex. An amazing number of us have.

If you are having sex outside of wedlock you are not a good catholic. Sorry to break it to you. the church is pretty clear on this point.

Catholicism defines chastity as the virtue that moderates the sexual appetite. Unmarried Catholics express chastity through. Sexual intercourse within marriage is considered chaste when it retains the twofold significance of union and procreation.

The pope(s) have spoken explicitly on this multiples times.

Or do you pick and choose which rules you follow?

Believing in the Nicene creed makes you a Catholic, not the hand waving the Pope does.


So you DO pick and choose the rules you follow.
 
2013-08-15 08:37:16 PM

The My Little Pony Killer: StoPPeRmobile: SpectroBoy: PrivateCaboose: RodneyToady: Easy solution: stop being Catholic.  An amazing number of us have.

Easier solution: be catholic and have protected premarital sex. An amazing number of us have.

If you are having sex outside of wedlock you are not a good catholic. Sorry to break it to you. the church is pretty clear on this point.

Catholicism defines chastity as the virtue that moderates the sexual appetite. Unmarried Catholics express chastity through. Sexual intercourse within marriage is considered chaste when it retains the twofold significance of union and procreation.

The pope(s) have spoken explicitly on this multiples times.

Or do you pick and choose which rules you follow?

Believing in the Nicene creed makes you a Catholic, not the hand waving the Pope does.

So you DO pick and choose the rules you follow.




I don't think so. I don't remember ever picking the rule not to kick pregnant woman, yet I have managed to make it this long, without kicking a pregnant woman.
 
Displayed 50 of 223 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report