unlikely: we have to use the indefinite article 'a dildo', never 'your dildo'
Prof. Frink: TFA: The recipient named a person she thought sent the item, but there was no proof. The recipient and her husband have injunctions against that person.Why would someone get an injunction against someone who would buy you that sort of gift?
Prof. Frink: Why would someone get an injunction against someone who would buy you that sort of gift?
generallyso: Prof. Frink: Why would someone get an injunction against someone who would buy you that sort of gift?Because the sender hopes to catch you using it when they peek through your window.
supayoda: Oh, I have one of those... Best $30 I ever spent, but I've noticed a few that get closer to the $100 range. For that price, it had better talk dirty to me and buy me dinner, though not necessarily in that order./I sound married.
uncleacid: The package was going tickle cock, tickle cock.
BlackMtnMan: I thought bunnies had pancakes on their heads...or was it pork chops? I'm so confused.
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Mar 24 2017 17:25:46
Runtime: 0.232 sec (231 ms)