If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Snopes)   No, the Obamas did not send a plane with just Bo to Maine. Now that that is settled, we can get back to important things... What's George Zimmerman been up to?   (snopes.com) divider line 111
    More: Obvious, Obamas, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, First Family, Portuguese Water Dog, Urban Legends Reference Pages, personal assistants, Aleutians, Democratic presidents  
•       •       •

1997 clicks; posted to Politics » on 13 Aug 2013 at 7:06 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



111 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-08-13 05:00:41 PM

frepnog: haha.  there is one of those people now that remain willfully ignorant of what transpired.

The youth in question left the area, went to his home, and returned and attacked a man who then was forced to shoot the youth in self defense.  Which is why the man in question was acquitted of the crime of which he was charged.

Obtuse.  Don't be that.


Poor George.
Just minding his own business.
Inexplicably and viciously "attacked" more thantwo minutes into the twenty second walk back to his pickup.
(He'd totally stopped trying to  stalk  follow the teenager.
Is "forced" to shoot the unarmed teenager he'd been stalking dead.
And I'm supposed to call that self-defense?

And I'm sure that you'll be perfectly fine with some random stranger strapping on a firearm and stalking your unarmed teenager at night. Should your kid stop running and confront that stranger, you are perfectly fine with that stranger shooting your kid dead.
Right?
 
2013-08-13 05:33:40 PM

demaL-demaL-yeH: frepnog: haha.  there is one of those people now that remain willfully ignorant of what transpired.

The youth in question left the area, went to his home, and returned and attacked a man who then was forced to shoot the youth in self defense.  Which is why the man in question was acquitted of the crime of which he was charged.

Obtuse.  Don't be that.

Poor George.
Just minding his own business.
Inexplicably and viciously "attacked" more thantwo minutes into the twenty second walk back to his pickup.
(He'd totally stopped trying to  stalk  follow the teenager.
Is "forced" to shoot the unarmed teenager he'd been stalking dead.
And I'm supposed to call that self-defense?

And I'm sure that you'll be perfectly fine with some random stranger strapping on a firearm and stalking your unarmed teenager at night. Should your kid stop running and confront that stranger, you are perfectly fine with that stranger shooting your kid dead.
Right?


Dude. You don't attack people. Period. If you do, you just might get shot. You can spew that garbage all day, but trayvon is dead because he attacked a man and continued that attack until his victim feared for his life. Trayvon went home and then came back to kick zimmerman's ass. His own friend admitted it. So i am sorry but your outlook on the situation is wrong. Do your research, put emotion aside and face the truth - that if you go around attacking people you might end up farking dead.
 
2013-08-13 06:10:49 PM

frepnog: demaL-demaL-yeH: frepnog: haha.  there is one of those people now that remain willfully ignorant of what transpired.

The youth in question left the area, went to his home, and returned and attacked a man who then was forced to shoot the youth in self defense.  Which is why the man in question was acquitted of the crime of which he was charged.

Obtuse.  Don't be that.

Poor George.
Just minding his own business.
Inexplicably and viciously "attacked" more thantwo minutes into the twenty second walk back to his pickup.
(He'd totally stopped trying to  stalk  follow the teenager.
Is "forced" to shoot the unarmed teenager he'd been stalking dead.
And I'm supposed to call that self-defense?

And I'm sure that you'll be perfectly fine with some random stranger strapping on a firearm and stalking your unarmed teenager at night. Should your kid stop running and confront that stranger, you are perfectly fine with that stranger shooting your kid dead.
Right?

Dude. You don't attack people. Period. If you do, you just might get shot. You can spew that garbage all day, but trayvon is dead because he attacked a man and continued that attack until his victim feared for his life. Trayvon went home and then came back to kick zimmerman's ass. His own friend admitted it. So i am sorry but your outlook on the situation is wrong. Do your research, put emotion aside and face the truth - that if you go around attacking people you might end up farking dead.


That there is a big assertion. And the only evidence we have of that assertion is that of the man who shot an unarmed teenager dead.

/A teenager who, had he survived and Zimmerman died, had an ironclad self-defense case: He was chasing me and he had a gun.
//It's even on the 911 tapes.
 
2013-08-13 06:26:32 PM
Fark needs a new ignore feature to hide posts that have anything whatsoever to do with the Zimmerman case.

Seriously people, let it go and stop thread-jacking. Yes, subby shares the blame with the sarcastic jab at some people's obsession with the story in the headline, but he isn't forcing you to be the type of idiots he was mocking.You are doing that yourselves.
 
2013-08-13 07:28:23 PM

frepnog: demaL-demaL-yeH: frepnog: haha.  there is one of those people now that remain willfully ignorant of what transpired.

The youth in question left the area, went to his home, and returned and attacked a man who then was forced to shoot the youth in self defense.  Which is why the man in question was acquitted of the crime of which he was charged.

Obtuse.  Don't be that.

Poor George.
Just minding his own business.
Inexplicably and viciously "attacked" more thantwo minutes into the twenty second walk back to his pickup.
(He'd totally stopped trying to  stalk  follow the teenager.
Is "forced" to shoot the unarmed teenager he'd been stalking dead.
And I'm supposed to call that self-defense?

And I'm sure that you'll be perfectly fine with some random stranger strapping on a firearm and stalking your unarmed teenager at night. Should your kid stop running and confront that stranger, you are perfectly fine with that stranger shooting your kid dead.
Right?

Dude. You don't attack people. Period. If you do, you just might get shot. You can spew that garbage all day, but trayvon is dead because he attacked a man and continued that attack until his victim feared for his life. Trayvon went home and then came back to kick zimmerman's ass. His own friend admitted it. So i am sorry but your outlook on the situation is wrong. Do your research, put emotion aside and face the truth - that if you go around attacking people you might end up farking dead.


No, Trayvon did not go home.  Quite simply never happened.
 
2013-08-13 07:42:16 PM

no_dice: frepnog: demaL-demaL-yeH: frepnog: haha.  there is one of those people now that remain willfully ignorant of what transpired.

The youth in question left the area, went to his home, and returned and attacked a man who then was forced to shoot the youth in self defense.  Which is why the man in question was acquitted of the crime of which he was charged.

Obtuse.  Don't be that.

Poor George.
Just minding his own business.
Inexplicably and viciously "attacked" more thantwo minutes into the twenty second walk back to his pickup.
(He'd totally stopped trying to  stalk  follow the teenager.
Is "forced" to shoot the unarmed teenager he'd been stalking dead.
And I'm supposed to call that self-defense?

And I'm sure that you'll be perfectly fine with some random stranger strapping on a firearm and stalking your unarmed teenager at night. Should your kid stop running and confront that stranger, you are perfectly fine with that stranger shooting your kid dead.
Right?

Dude. You don't attack people. Period. If you do, you just might get shot. You can spew that garbage all day, but trayvon is dead because he attacked a man and continued that attack until his victim feared for his life. Trayvon went home and then came back to kick zimmerman's ass. His own friend admitted it. So i am sorry but your outlook on the situation is wrong. Do your research, put emotion aside and face the truth - that if you go around attacking people you might end up farking dead.

No, Trayvon did not go home.  Quite simply never happened.


Sorry you think so. However his friend rachel admitted it. And admitted that trayvon went to whoop cracka ass, in her words. But you are entitled to your opinion, even if reality doesn't agree.

/agrees. No more zimm. fark that dude.
 
2013-08-13 07:49:18 PM

frepnog: no_dice: frepnog: demaL-demaL-yeH: frepnog: haha.  there is one of those people now that remain willfully ignorant of what transpired.

The youth in question left the area, went to his home, and returned and attacked a man who then was forced to shoot the youth in self defense.  Which is why the man in question was acquitted of the crime of which he was charged.

Obtuse.  Don't be that.

Poor George.
Just minding his own business.
Inexplicably and viciously "attacked" more thantwo minutes into the twenty second walk back to his pickup.
(He'd totally stopped trying to  stalk  follow the teenager.
Is "forced" to shoot the unarmed teenager he'd been stalking dead.
And I'm supposed to call that self-defense?

And I'm sure that you'll be perfectly fine with some random stranger strapping on a firearm and stalking your unarmed teenager at night. Should your kid stop running and confront that stranger, you are perfectly fine with that stranger shooting your kid dead.
Right?

Dude. You don't attack people. Period. If you do, you just might get shot. You can spew that garbage all day, but trayvon is dead because he attacked a man and continued that attack until his victim feared for his life. Trayvon went home and then came back to kick zimmerman's ass. His own friend admitted it. So i am sorry but your outlook on the situation is wrong. Do your research, put emotion aside and face the truth - that if you go around attacking people you might end up farking dead.

No, Trayvon did not go home.  Quite simply never happened.

Sorry you think so. However his friend rachel admitted it. And admitted that trayvon went to whoop cracka ass, in her words. But you are entitled to your opinion, even if reality doesn't agree.

/agrees. No more zimm. fark that dude.


His friend admitted that he turned around and asked Zimmerman why he was following him.  At no point did Trayvon even reach his property that night, let alone his home.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2349794/George-Zimmerman-tri al -Rachel-Jeantel-Trayvon-Martin-prosecutions-star-witness-dragged-coals -defense.html

There's an article regarding her testimony.  Feel free to point out where she said he went home and then went back out to find Zimmerman.
 
2013-08-13 08:10:41 PM

frepnog: No, Trayvon did not go home.  Quite simply never happened.

Sorry you think so. However his friend rachel admitted it. And admitted that trayvon went to whoop cracka ass, in her words*. But you are entitled to your opinion, even if reality doesn't agree.

/agrees. No more zimm. fark that dude.


*Not intended to bear any resemblance to her actual testimony in court.
Her actual words? Glad you asked. Under cross examination in court Rachel Jeantel replied,
'That's retarded sir,' when asked if Trayvon Martin attacked George Zimmerman.

If you have to lie like a hound dog to make your case and the public record is easily checked, Mr. Revisionist Historian, you'll only make your case with Fox viewers.
 
2013-08-13 08:25:38 PM

demaL-demaL-yeH: frepnog: No, Trayvon did not go home.  Quite simply never happened.

Sorry you think so. However his friend rachel admitted it. And admitted that trayvon went to whoop cracka ass, in her words*. But you are entitled to your opinion, even if reality doesn't agree.

/agrees. No more zimm. fark that dude.

*Not intended to bear any resemblance to her actual testimony in court.
Her actual words? Glad you asked. Under cross examination in court Rachel Jeantel replied,
'That's retarded sir,' when asked if Trayvon Martin attacked George Zimmerman.

If you have to lie like a hound dog to make your case and the public record is easily checked, Mr. Revisionist Historian, you'll only make your case with Fox viewers.


Sigh.
 
2013-08-13 08:37:53 PM

frepnog: demaL-demaL-yeH: frepnog: No, Trayvon did not go home.  Quite simply never happened.

Sorry you think so. However his friend rachel admitted it. And admitted that trayvon went to whoop cracka ass, in her words*. But you are entitled to your opinion, even if reality doesn't agree.

/agrees. No more zimm. fark that dude.

*Not intended to bear any resemblance to her actual testimony in court.
Her actual words? Glad you asked. Under cross examination in court Rachel Jeantel replied,
'That's retarded sir,' when asked if Trayvon Martin attacked George Zimmerman.

If you have to lie like a hound dog to make your case and the public record is easily checked, Mr. Revisionist Historian, you'll only make your case with Fox viewers.

Sigh.


Sigh all you want.  Both his friend and the evidence say that Trayvon never went home.  The "cracker" comment you're referring to was Trayvon saying some "Creepy ass cracker" was following him.

"West pressed her on what he indicated were inconsistencies between the letter and Jeantel's subsequent depositions and testimony - in particular her recent revelation that Martin told her he was being followed by a 'creepy-a** cracker.'"

But by all means, feel free to provide sources to back up your claims that Trayvon made it home and went back out and also where he said that he was going to "whoop cracka ass".
 
2013-08-13 08:41:38 PM

SordidEuphemism: demaL-demaL-yeH: notto: Satan's Bunny Slippers: dumbobruni: notto: no_dice: Karac: RevRaven: IlGreven: Those two sentences are contradictory. The second shows you do not get what he was saying, else you'd agree with Snopes' assessment.

Nope, I totally get it. He helped sponsor and pass funding that allowed the Internet to move from the hands of government to the private sector, which allowed for our modern Internet to come to be. However, that is quite different from "creating the Internet" as he said on CNN, wherein he was hoping to capitalize on people believing he helped create as in engineer the Internet. That part, the "creating the Internet" part, he did say. There's no way around it.

So you admit that without Al Gore the internet would not exist as it does today - that he played some part in bringing it about.  However, you're taking issue with something he didn't actually say, something only you heard - that he was the only person going around the country running wires and setting up routers.

This seems to be a common theme with conservatives - arguing not about what someone actually said or did, but instead about something only you heard from the voices in your head.  That's how we get a debate over whether Obama called Benghazi terrorism or whether 'acts of terror' in a Benghazi speech meant only other incidents.  It's how we get Ron Paul debating a actor in blackface.  It's how Clint Eastwood gets standing ovations for debating a chair.

Can anyone give me the technical name for this habit?  Because it seems to be quite common with conservatives and I'd like a proper noun for it.

Borderline retardation?

Bachmannized.

Getting Triggy With It.

Palinology

"Watching the Neighborhood"

Manufacturing Poutrage.

Puttin' the Gravy in the Giblets


Pounding the cheese? (ten times?)
 
Displayed 11 of 111 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report