If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Snopes)   No, the Obamas did not send a plane with just Bo to Maine. Now that that is settled, we can get back to important things... What's George Zimmerman been up to?   (snopes.com) divider line 111
    More: Obvious, Obamas, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, First Family, Portuguese Water Dog, Urban Legends Reference Pages, personal assistants, Aleutians, Democratic presidents  
•       •       •

1999 clicks; posted to Politics » on 13 Aug 2013 at 7:06 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



111 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-08-13 09:46:25 AM  

notto: no_dice: Karac: RevRaven: IlGreven: Those two sentences are contradictory. The second shows you do not get what he was saying, else you'd agree with Snopes' assessment.

Nope, I totally get it. He helped sponsor and pass funding that allowed the Internet to move from the hands of government to the private sector, which allowed for our modern Internet to come to be. However, that is quite different from "creating the Internet" as he said on CNN, wherein he was hoping to capitalize on people believing he helped create as in engineer the Internet. That part, the "creating the Internet" part, he did say. There's no way around it.

So you admit that without Al Gore the internet would not exist as it does today - that he played some part in bringing it about.  However, you're taking issue with something he didn't actually say, something only you heard - that he was the only person going around the country running wires and setting up routers.

This seems to be a common theme with conservatives - arguing not about what someone actually said or did, but instead about something only you heard from the voices in your head.  That's how we get a debate over whether Obama called Benghazi terrorism or whether 'acts of terror' in a Benghazi speech meant only other incidents.  It's how we get Ron Paul debating a actor in blackface.  It's how Clint Eastwood gets standing ovations for debating a chair.

Can anyone give me the technical name for this habit?  Because it seems to be quite common with conservatives and I'd like a proper noun for it.

Borderline retardation?

Bachmannized.


Getting Triggy With It.
 
2013-08-13 09:48:05 AM  

dumbobruni: notto: no_dice: Karac: RevRaven: IlGreven: Those two sentences are contradictory. The second shows you do not get what he was saying, else you'd agree with Snopes' assessment.

Nope, I totally get it. He helped sponsor and pass funding that allowed the Internet to move from the hands of government to the private sector, which allowed for our modern Internet to come to be. However, that is quite different from "creating the Internet" as he said on CNN, wherein he was hoping to capitalize on people believing he helped create as in engineer the Internet. That part, the "creating the Internet" part, he did say. There's no way around it.

So you admit that without Al Gore the internet would not exist as it does today - that he played some part in bringing it about.  However, you're taking issue with something he didn't actually say, something only you heard - that he was the only person going around the country running wires and setting up routers.

This seems to be a common theme with conservatives - arguing not about what someone actually said or did, but instead about something only you heard from the voices in your head.  That's how we get a debate over whether Obama called Benghazi terrorism or whether 'acts of terror' in a Benghazi speech meant only other incidents.  It's how we get Ron Paul debating a actor in blackface.  It's how Clint Eastwood gets standing ovations for debating a chair.

Can anyone give me the technical name for this habit?  Because it seems to be quite common with conservatives and I'd like a proper noun for it.

Borderline retardation?

Bachmannized.

Getting Triggy With It.


Palinology
 
2013-08-13 10:12:28 AM  
I heard Zimmerman was changing his name to Ben Gazi, so the administration will quit talking about him.
 
2013-08-13 10:13:10 AM  

Arkanaut: Neighborhood Watch: ManateeGag: Does this bullshiat story come up every time the family travels?


As long as the Obamas (and especially Moochelle) keep demanding 'sacrifice' from everyone, yes - yes it is.

Hi George!


Reads more like Lennie to me.

bks9.books.google.com
 
2013-08-13 10:21:27 AM  

Satan's Bunny Slippers: dumbobruni: notto: no_dice: Karac: RevRaven: IlGreven: Those two sentences are contradictory. The second shows you do not get what he was saying, else you'd agree with Snopes' assessment.

Nope, I totally get it. He helped sponsor and pass funding that allowed the Internet to move from the hands of government to the private sector, which allowed for our modern Internet to come to be. However, that is quite different from "creating the Internet" as he said on CNN, wherein he was hoping to capitalize on people believing he helped create as in engineer the Internet. That part, the "creating the Internet" part, he did say. There's no way around it.

So you admit that without Al Gore the internet would not exist as it does today - that he played some part in bringing it about.  However, you're taking issue with something he didn't actually say, something only you heard - that he was the only person going around the country running wires and setting up routers.

This seems to be a common theme with conservatives - arguing not about what someone actually said or did, but instead about something only you heard from the voices in your head.  That's how we get a debate over whether Obama called Benghazi terrorism or whether 'acts of terror' in a Benghazi speech meant only other incidents.  It's how we get Ron Paul debating a actor in blackface.  It's how Clint Eastwood gets standing ovations for debating a chair.

Can anyone give me the technical name for this habit?  Because it seems to be quite common with conservatives and I'd like a proper noun for it.

Borderline retardation?

Bachmannized.

Getting Triggy With It.

Palinology


What's wrong with Republican?
 
2013-08-13 10:32:23 AM  
Hey, AlGore - you didn't build that!
 
2013-08-13 10:33:24 AM  
In September 2011, someone thought to tack the following preface onto the "Bo travels on his own plane" canard: IN THE MUSLIM RELIGION, DOGS ARE UNCLEAN AND NOT ALLOWED TO TRAVEL IN THE SAME VEHICLE AS THE MUSLIM.

You can have them in your house, but not your car. Sounds legit.
 
2013-08-13 10:40:18 AM  
Lazy trolls can always phone it in with race-baiting. Having a blah president is a godsend for them.
 
2013-08-13 10:52:41 AM  
Karac: Can anyone give me the technical name for this habit? Because it seems to be quite common with conservatives and I'd like a proper noun for it.

Delusion.
 
2013-08-13 11:02:13 AM  
The smallest measure of time was recorded in this thread between 0 and derp.
 
2013-08-13 11:17:22 AM  

vernonFL: I love that Republicans have been starting these types of rumors since 1944.


Hey, they had a hell of a year in 1928.
 
2013-08-13 11:21:26 AM  
I never voted for Obama and disagree with his politics, but do we have to go into this shiat?  Is it really relevant?  Does him flying the dog there validate the principles of small-government conservatism?  I know I sound naïve as shiat, and being in government myself I should know better, but I really wish we could accept that someone who disagrees with you about the role of government in American society is not automatically evil and morally inferior.  They just have a different opinion.  Sometimes, a different subculture.  Why's that such a big deal?
 
2013-08-13 11:21:38 AM  

Karac: RevRaven: IlGreven: Those two sentences are contradictory. The second shows you do not get what he was saying, else you'd agree with Snopes' assessment.

Nope, I totally get it. He helped sponsor and pass funding that allowed the Internet to move from the hands of government to the private sector, which allowed for our modern Internet to come to be. However, that is quite different from "creating the Internet" as he said on CNN, wherein he was hoping to capitalize on people believing he helped create as in engineer the Internet. That part, the "creating the Internet" part, he did say. There's no way around it.

So you admit that without Al Gore the internet would not exist as it does today - that he played some part in bringing it about.  However, you're taking issue with something he didn't actually say, something only you heard - that he was the only person going around the country running wires and setting up routers.

This seems to be a common theme with conservatives - arguing not about what someone actually said or did, but instead about something only you heard from the voices in your head.  That's how we get a debate over whether Obama called Benghazi terrorism or whether 'acts of terror' in a Benghazi speech meant only other incidents.  It's how we get Ron Paul debating a actor in blackface.  It's how Clint Eastwood gets standing ovations for debating a chair.

Can anyone give me the technical name for this habit?  Because it seems to be quite common with conservatives and I'd like a proper noun for it.


Cognitive Dissonance
Deliberately Obtuse
Stupid on Purpose

They all work.
 
2013-08-13 11:22:49 AM  
 
2013-08-13 11:28:12 AM  

trey101: yep, he just flies on helicopters.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/10236302/First -d og-Bo-is-airlifted-to-Obama-holiday-home.html

just in case it doesnt link it...   http://bit.ly/1cFyekj


according to your article it was once in one of the secret service ospreys (not a helicopter) that were coming anyways.

What a scandal!
 
2013-08-13 11:28:39 AM  

FLMountainMan: I really wish we could accept that someone who disagrees with you about the role of government in American society is not automatically evil and morally inferior.



Do you interact with Fark LiberalsTM much?
 
2013-08-13 11:29:25 AM  

FLMountainMan: I never voted for Obama and disagree with his politics, but do we have to go into this shiat?  Is it really relevant?  Does him flying the dog there validate the principles of small-government conservatism?  I know I sound naïve as shiat, and being in government myself I should know better, but I really wish we could accept that someone who disagrees with you about the role of government in American society is not automatically evil and morally inferior.  They just have a different opinion.  Sometimes, a different subculture.  Why's that such a big deal?


Florida, huh? You're going to be purged from the voter rolls for that comment.
 
2013-08-13 11:40:23 AM  

Neighborhood Watch: FLMountainMan: I really wish we could accept that someone who disagrees with you about the role of government in American society is not automatically evil and morally inferior.


Do you interact with Fark LiberalsTM much?


Well if you spent your time making cogent points about the role of government in society instead of witticism like "moochelle," birtherism and "reparations" you would be engaged at the that level.  But since you don't people treat you like a clown, because you are, in fact, a clown.  Clowns are fun to laugh at.
 
2013-08-13 11:45:50 AM  

amiable: Neighborhood Watch: FLMountainMan: I really wish we could accept that someone who disagrees with you about the role of government in American society is not automatically evil and morally inferior.


Do you interact with Fark LiberalsTM much?

Well if you spent your time making cogent points about the role of government in society instead of witticism like "moochelle," birtherism and "reparations" you would be engaged at the that level.  But since you don't people treat you like a clown, because you are, in fact, a clown.  Clowns are fun to laugh at.


Sure you want to use that analogy?  Most Farkers are terrified of clowns, in case you hadn't noticed....

/no one's terrified of NW
//or slashies
 
2013-08-13 11:49:26 AM  

Satan's Bunny Slippers: dumbobruni: notto: no_dice: Karac: RevRaven: IlGreven: Those two sentences are contradictory. The second shows you do not get what he was saying, else you'd agree with Snopes' assessment.

Nope, I totally get it. He helped sponsor and pass funding that allowed the Internet to move from the hands of government to the private sector, which allowed for our modern Internet to come to be. However, that is quite different from "creating the Internet" as he said on CNN, wherein he was hoping to capitalize on people believing he helped create as in engineer the Internet. That part, the "creating the Internet" part, he did say. There's no way around it.

So you admit that without Al Gore the internet would not exist as it does today - that he played some part in bringing it about.  However, you're taking issue with something he didn't actually say, something only you heard - that he was the only person going around the country running wires and setting up routers.

This seems to be a common theme with conservatives - arguing not about what someone actually said or did, but instead about something only you heard from the voices in your head.  That's how we get a debate over whether Obama called Benghazi terrorism or whether 'acts of terror' in a Benghazi speech meant only other incidents.  It's how we get Ron Paul debating a actor in blackface.  It's how Clint Eastwood gets standing ovations for debating a chair.

Can anyone give me the technical name for this habit?  Because it seems to be quite common with conservatives and I'd like a proper noun for it.

Borderline retardation?

Bachmannized.

Getting Triggy With It.

Palinology


"Watching the Neighborhood"
 
2013-08-13 11:49:29 AM  

RevRaven: However, that is quite different from "creating the Internet" as he said on CNN, wherein he was hoping to capitalize on people believing he helped create as in engineer the Internet. That part, the "creating the Internet" part, he did say. There's no way around it.


So basically your argument is this: you understand perfectly what he meant, and you agree that what he meant is completely valid. However, your amazing telepathic abilities allow you to determine that his secret intent was to have people less smart than you misunderstand him and infer something entirely different? And furthermore, the astounding reach of your telepathy allows you to discover that many people, none of whom you have ever met or discussed this, did indeed fall for his clever misdirection?

Seriously, that's your position? Because I have to tell you, it's not making you sound very smart.
 
2013-08-13 12:08:05 PM  

notto: Satan's Bunny Slippers: dumbobruni: notto: no_dice: Karac: RevRaven: IlGreven: Those two sentences are contradictory. The second shows you do not get what he was saying, else you'd agree with Snopes' assessment.

Nope, I totally get it. He helped sponsor and pass funding that allowed the Internet to move from the hands of government to the private sector, which allowed for our modern Internet to come to be. However, that is quite different from "creating the Internet" as he said on CNN, wherein he was hoping to capitalize on people believing he helped create as in engineer the Internet. That part, the "creating the Internet" part, he did say. There's no way around it.

So you admit that without Al Gore the internet would not exist as it does today - that he played some part in bringing it about.  However, you're taking issue with something he didn't actually say, something only you heard - that he was the only person going around the country running wires and setting up routers.

This seems to be a common theme with conservatives - arguing not about what someone actually said or did, but instead about something only you heard from the voices in your head.  That's how we get a debate over whether Obama called Benghazi terrorism or whether 'acts of terror' in a Benghazi speech meant only other incidents.  It's how we get Ron Paul debating a actor in blackface.  It's how Clint Eastwood gets standing ovations for debating a chair.

Can anyone give me the technical name for this habit?  Because it seems to be quite common with conservatives and I'd like a proper noun for it.

Borderline retardation?

Bachmannized.

Getting Triggy With It.

Palinology

"Watching the Neighborhood"


Manufacturing Poutrage.
 
2013-08-13 12:09:48 PM  

demaL-demaL-yeH: notto: Satan's Bunny Slippers: dumbobruni: notto: no_dice: Karac: RevRaven: IlGreven: Those two sentences are contradictory. The second shows you do not get what he was saying, else you'd agree with Snopes' assessment.

Nope, I totally get it. He helped sponsor and pass funding that allowed the Internet to move from the hands of government to the private sector, which allowed for our modern Internet to come to be. However, that is quite different from "creating the Internet" as he said on CNN, wherein he was hoping to capitalize on people believing he helped create as in engineer the Internet. That part, the "creating the Internet" part, he did say. There's no way around it.

So you admit that without Al Gore the internet would not exist as it does today - that he played some part in bringing it about.  However, you're taking issue with something he didn't actually say, something only you heard - that he was the only person going around the country running wires and setting up routers.

This seems to be a common theme with conservatives - arguing not about what someone actually said or did, but instead about something only you heard from the voices in your head.  That's how we get a debate over whether Obama called Benghazi terrorism or whether 'acts of terror' in a Benghazi speech meant only other incidents.  It's how we get Ron Paul debating a actor in blackface.  It's how Clint Eastwood gets standing ovations for debating a chair.

Can anyone give me the technical name for this habit?  Because it seems to be quite common with conservatives and I'd like a proper noun for it.

Borderline retardation?

Bachmannized.

Getting Triggy With It.

Palinology

"Watching the Neighborhood"

Manufacturing Poutrage.


Puttin' the Gravy in the Giblets
 
2013-08-13 12:10:32 PM  

czetie: RevRaven: However, that is quite different from "creating the Internet" as he said on CNN, wherein he was hoping to capitalize on people believing he helped create as in engineer the Internet. That part, the "creating the Internet" part, he did say. There's no way around it.

So basically your argument is this: you understand perfectly what he meant, and you agree that what he meant is completely valid. However, your amazing telepathic abilities allow you to determine that his secret intent was to have people less smart than you misunderstand him and infer something entirely different? And furthermore, the astounding reach of your telepathy allows you to discover that many people, none of whom you have ever met or discussed this, did indeed fall for his clever misdirection?

Seriously, that's your position? Because I have to tell you, it's not making you sound very smart.


These are the replies that keeps me coming back to Fark.
 
2013-08-13 12:44:48 PM  
I hear Romney's dog is jealous.  He got transported on the top of a station wagon during a family vacation.

www.momscleanairforce.org
 
2013-08-13 12:44:57 PM  

Rev. Skarekroe: RevRaven: IlGreven: Those two sentences are contradictory. The second shows you do not get what he was saying, else you'd agree with Snopes' assessment.

Nope, I totally get it. He helped sponsor and pass funding that allowed the Internet to move from the hands of government to the private sector, which allowed for our modern Internet to come to be. However, that is quite different from "creating the Internet" as he said on CNN, wherein he was hoping to capitalize on people believing he helped create as in engineer the Internet. That part, the "creating the Internet" part, he did say. There's no way around it.

Nope, no way around it.
Unless you include the beginning of the sentence where he says "I took the initiative in" which changes the meaning.


Is this like J4T loonies saying that Zimmerman disobeyed the police dispatcher who said "we don't need you to do that" by leaving out the part where he said "ok" and then stopped running?
 
2013-08-13 12:47:30 PM  
Zimmerman?  The right wing assured us that he would be hunted down and murdered by lefty terrorists by now.
 
2013-08-13 12:57:54 PM  

SamWaters: I hear Romney's dog is jealous.  He got transported on the top of a station wagon during a family vacation.



Yeah, but they weren't rich (they didn't have Airforce One or a $100,0000 a year 'dog handler', either) and the dog liked it.

But they didn't eat him.  So there's that.


/btw, does the $100,000 a year 'dog handler' get to party on these royal vacations as well, or is the dog not 'handled' during this time period?
 
2013-08-13 12:59:00 PM  

frepnog: J4T loonies


What does this mean?
 
2013-08-13 01:02:43 PM  

JusticeandIndependence: frepnog: J4T loonies

What does this mean?


people that ignore the reality of the situation and claim that an innocent child was stalked and murdered.  Add in a token "stand your ground" reference and we have it.
 
2013-08-13 01:19:52 PM  

lilbjorn: Zimmerman?  The right wing assured us that he would be hunted down and murdered by lefty terrorists by now.


They're still bummed about the lack of race riots.
 
2013-08-13 01:22:51 PM  

frepnog: Is this like J4T loonies saying that Zimmerman disobeyed the police dispatcher who said "we don't need you to do that" by leaving out the part where he said "ok" and then stopped running?


No, it's like folks thinking that watching and reading everything about a murder trial where one of only two participants is unable to participate because, you know, they're dead makes those same folks magically omniscient, capable of speaking with exact authority as to why poor old George Zimmerman was just defending himself from an angry, giant, drug-dealing maniac of a teenager.
 
2013-08-13 01:23:37 PM  

frepnog: JusticeandIndependence: frepnog: J4T loonies

What does this mean?

people that ignore the reality of the situation and claim that an innocent child was stalked and murdered.  Add in a token "stand your ground" reference and we have it.


An innocent child was standing his ground when Zimmerman shot him.
 
2013-08-13 01:30:40 PM  

Neighborhood Watch: SamWaters: I hear Romney's dog is jealous.  He got transported on the top of a station wagon during a family vacation.


Yeah, but they weren't rich (they didn't have Airforce One or a $100,0000 a year 'dog handler', either) and the dog liked it.

But they didn't eat him.  So there's that.


/btw, does the $100,000 a year 'dog handler' get to party on these royal vacations as well, or is the dog not 'handled' during this time period?


I honestly feel kind of bad for you:  http://wafflesatnoon.com/2013/02/26/does-obama-pay-dog-trainer-102000 - at-tax-payer-expense/

"As evidence of sloppy research, Gray at one point in his book refers to the White House paying $102,000 to a man who walks Obama's dog, saying that one point the "handler" was flown to Maine with the dog. (This anecdote also ended up in the Daily Caller article.)

This appears to refer to Reggie Love, then the president's personal assistant, who was once spotted taking the dog off an airplane. But the local Maine newspaper initially misreported that Love and the dog were flown on their own airplane. The article was corrected,  but not before the blogosphere looked up Love's salary and went wild with the tale of the $102,000-a-year dog handler. "
 
2013-08-13 01:32:12 PM  

frepnog: J4T loonies


Seriously, what the heck is this now?
 
2013-08-13 01:43:41 PM  
Fart_Machine:   They're MSNBC is still bummed about the lack of race riots.


FIFY
 
2013-08-13 01:51:51 PM  

someonelse: frepnog: J4T loonies

Seriously, what the heck is this now?


That's a term used by that special subset of people who think that it's perfectly OK to stalk a teenager in your pickup truck; get out and chase said teenager on foot when he understandably runs away from you; get into a fight with the kid more than two minutes after you're told that cops are on the way and to stop chasing the kid; shoot him dead when he's, understandably, attempting to kick your confrontational stalker ass; and get away with it.
 
2013-08-13 02:17:34 PM  

someonelse: frepnog: J4T loonies

Seriously, what the heck is this now?


All threads involving black people have to be Trayvon Martin threads now.
 
2013-08-13 02:32:35 PM  

demaL-demaL-yeH: someonelse: frepnog: J4T loonies

Seriously, what the heck is this now?

That's a term used by that special subset of people who think that it's perfectly OK to stalk a teenager in your pickup truck; get out and chase said teenager on foot when he understandably runs away from you; get into a fight with the kid more than two minutes after you're told that cops are on the way and to stop chasing the kid; shoot him dead when he's, understandably, attempting to kick your confrontational stalker ass; and get away with it.


haha.  there is one of those people now that remain willfully ignorant of what transpired.

The youth in question left the area, went to his home, and returned and attacked a man who then was forced to shoot the youth in self defense.  Which is why the man in question was acquitted of the crime of which he was charged.

geologistsinthemovies.com

Obtuse.  Don't be that.
 
2013-08-13 02:32:40 PM  

demaL-demaL-yeH: someonelse: frepnog: J4T loonies

Seriously, what the heck is this now?

That's a term used by that special subset of people who think that it's perfectly OK to stalk a teenager in your pickup truck; get out and chase said teenager on foot when he understandably runs away from you; get into a fight with the kid more than two minutes after you're told that cops are on the way and to stop chasing the kid; shoot him dead when he's, understandably, attempting to kick your confrontational stalker ass; and get away with it.


Sadly, in Florida, it is perfectly ok, legal even.
 
2013-08-13 02:34:27 PM  

21-37-42: Sadly, in Florida, it is perfectly ok, legal even.


it is neither legal or ok to stalk and shoot someone, even in Florida.  It is however ok and legal to shoot someone that is attacking you and has you on the ground continuing their assault as you scream for help.

The law.  Funny how it works.
 
2013-08-13 02:53:34 PM  

Muta: The Snopes is run by the Democratic Party.


I have Facebook friends who argue in all seriousness that snopes has a liberal bias, and I have to point out that it was founded and is run by two former GOP operatives who describe themselves as "registered republicans."

But then, these people still believe in the $8 billion Planned Parenthood Abortionplex.  Cognitive bias, how does it work?
 
2013-08-13 03:02:12 PM  

Neighborhood Watch: /btw, does the $100,000 a year 'dog handler' get to party on these royal vacations as well, or is the dog not 'handled' during this time period?


You're trying to insinuate that Obama pays someone $100K to take care of his dog.  This is a lie.

From the link, the person who runs the obedience school that Bo briefly attended makes $102K per year off the entire business, not just the Obamas.

You know, you might learn something if you get your head out of that outrage echo chamber once in a while.  Life can be tough when reality is always subservient to the horrible things that you merely WISH were true.
 
2013-08-13 03:10:51 PM  

demaL-demaL-yeH: someonelse: frepnog: J4T loonies

Seriously, what the heck is this now?

That's a term used by that special subset of people who think that it's perfectly OK to stalk a teenager in your pickup truck; get out and chase said teenager on foot when he understandably runs away from you; get into a fight with the kid more than two minutes after you're told that cops are on the way and to stop chasing the kid; shoot him dead when he's, understandably, attempting to kick your confrontational stalker ass; and get away with it.


Meh I just call them what they are, Hispanic.
 
2013-08-13 03:21:24 PM  

Neighborhood Watch: ManateeGag: Does this bullshiat story come up every time the family travels?


As long as the Obamas (and especially Moochelle) keep demanding 'sacrifice' from everyone, yes - yes it is.


By the Sequester? The same Sequester that cut budgets across the board, except for the families of Congressman and their families, but still impacted the President and his family? The same Sequester that could have been avoided if Congress pulled their heads out of their asses and actually paid off debts that Congress itself promised to pay off?
 
2013-08-13 03:23:31 PM  

dinch: Demanding reparations... That's a good one.

Zing!


Meh, Dave Chappelle did it better
 
2013-08-13 03:51:00 PM  

frepnog: The youth in question left the area, went to his home, and returned and attacked a man who then was forced to shoot the youth in self defense.  Which is why the man in question was acquitted of the crime of which he was charged.

Obtuse.  Don't be that.


I've never once heard this version of events.  Where does this theory come from?
 
2013-08-13 04:06:16 PM  

Johnny_Whistle: frepnog: The youth in question left the area, went to his home, and returned and attacked a man who then was forced to shoot the youth in self defense.  Which is why the man in question was acquitted of the crime of which he was charged.

Obtuse.  Don't be that.

I've never once heard this version of events.  Where does this theory come from?


from the testimony and evidence presented at the trial.  seriously, where the fark you been?
 
2013-08-13 04:36:14 PM  

frepnog: Johnny_Whistle: frepnog: The youth in question left the area, went to his home, and returned and attacked a man who then was forced to shoot the youth in self defense.  Which is why the man in question was acquitted of the crime of which he was charged.

Obtuse.  Don't be that.

I've never once heard this version of events.  Where does this theory come from?

from the testimony and evidence presented at the trial.  seriously, where the fark you been?


Can you provide a link to the testimony showing that Trayvon Martin went home and then came back?  I've seriously never heard this account anywhere.
 
2013-08-13 04:36:45 PM  

frepnog: J4T loonies


Now that I realize what this means: Let it go, man. Just let it go. Go home. It's over.

www.filmbuffonline.com
 
Displayed 50 of 111 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report