If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Hill)   Patrick Leahy's bill requiring government agencies to get a search warrant has been blocked by a senate Republican. Which one? Sorry we can't tell you that, it's an anonymous hold; and as you know the Senate takes its privacy very seriously   (thehill.com) divider line 4
    More: Sad, Republican Block, Republican, search warrants, Electronic Communications Privacy Act, Senate Judiciary Committee, Grassley, Senate  
•       •       •

1252 clicks; posted to Politics » on 05 Aug 2013 at 2:53 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2013-08-05 02:50:30 PM
4 votes:

netizencain: The bill is flawed... "She warned that applying a warrant requirement to the SEC would impede the agency's "ability to protect investors and to assist victims of securities fraud."

Seems that the bill doesn't need to be rushed through with mistakes... just address the SEC's concerns.  Done.


Don't get me started on LSU.
2013-08-05 03:08:58 PM
2 votes:

vudukungfu: Only man in the senate with balls.


"LANCE ARMSTRONG FOR SENATE - NO ONE ELSE HAS BALLS THERE, MAY AS WELL ELECT ONE."
jbc [TotalFark]
2013-08-05 05:11:06 PM
1 votes:

Chewb1zz: tenpoundsofcheese: Anonymous hold is the issue I was referring to.
Isn't Reid in charge of the Senate?
Doesn't Obama have even the slightest bit of influence on Reid? I thought he cared about transparency?

Except whichever republican put the hold on the bill only has to inform the leader of his/her party. So not Reid, but McConnell. Senate works under the concept of unanimous consent.


You're trying to explain the rules of the Senate to someone who can't even grasp the rules to Candyland? Good luck with that.
2013-08-05 03:20:44 PM
1 votes:

Mikey1969: Why are these assholes against Due Process?


Had the Founding Fathers realized that you have nothing to worry about if you've done nothing wrong then they wouldn't have included the 4th Amendment.
 
Displayed 4 of 4 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report