If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(WTKR)   Marines begin production of new helmet that appears to have been designed by Grand Moff Tarkin   (wtkr.com) divider line 63
    More: Interesting, music production, combat helmet  
•       •       •

11121 clicks; posted to Geek » on 04 Aug 2013 at 10:40 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



63 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-08-05 08:54:59 AM  
Can't tell if thats a man or a woman....
 
2013-08-05 09:10:52 AM  

way south: DirtyDeadGhostofEbenezerCooke: StoPPeRmobile: AngryDragon: HotIgneous Intruder: German Army helmets.
Interesting.

/Gott Mit Uns!

It is an interesting parallel.

[lh3.ggpht.com image 550x516]

farkers knew what they were doing.

Germans: great at making hats, terrible at winning wars.

Not that I disagree, but they did manage to hold off most of the world for the better part of a decade.

/But it turned out the idiot who got the war going was an idiot right on through to the end.
/Shouldn't take away from the fact that they were the most powerful army the world had ever seen.
/Everyone copied them.


Lets look into that shall we.
The Germany kicked off the war as it was in Sept 1939. At which point they were waging war against Poland and.....nobody else. As a matter of fact, you can go so far as to say they were actually assisted by another great power, the USSR even if only politically.
It really didnt become a World War until the invasion of Western Europe saw the Scandinavian countries getting put down and France going tits up. These events were in 1940-1941
The Germans then did a silly thing by attacking the Soviet Union and by virtue of aggressors initiative managed to push pretty deep into the Motherland.

Then it all fell apart. In 1942, North Africa was stabilized and was swinging the way of the Allies. The med was wide open and the German Summer Offensive of 1942 hit the brick wall that was the Caucasus. By early 1943, the Germans were pretty much in full retreat or at least defensive posturing EVERYWHERE.

So really, the vaunted 'German Military' was only kicking anyones ass for about 3 years AT MOST and for 2 of those years were only fighting nations that didnt even know war was about to happen to them. The German military was about as effective strategically as a mugger in the night. Great at pounding down isolated and weak nations but terrible at fighting anyone else. The Germans certainly werent as powerful Naval wise as the UK....or even Aerial wise. Their land forces were a joke compared to the USSR, and by 1942 it could be claimed that the vastly under prepared US forces had either superiority in men and material or at least parity.

Germany really only got as far as it did because of the general unpreparedness of its neighbors, not because of any inherent ability of the German army or its command structure. Replace Hitler with anybody else and the same result happens in roughly the same time of events.
 
2013-08-05 10:35:01 AM  

Subtle_Canary: way south: DirtyDeadGhostofEbenezerCooke: StoPPeRmobile: AngryDragon: HotIgneous Intruder: German Army helmets.
Interesting.

/Gott Mit Uns!

It is an interesting parallel.

[lh3.ggpht.com image 550x516]

farkers knew what they were doing.

Germans: great at making hats, terrible at winning wars.

Not that I disagree, but they did manage to hold off most of the world for the better part of a decade.

/But it turned out the idiot who got the war going was an idiot right on through to the end.
/Shouldn't take away from the fact that they were the most powerful army the world had ever seen.
/Everyone copied them.

Lets look into that shall we.
The Germany kicked off the war as it was in Sept 1939. At which point they were waging war against Poland and.....nobody else. As a matter of fact, you can go so far as to say they were actually assisted by another great power, the USSR even if only politically.
It really didnt become a World War until the invasion of Western Europe saw the Scandinavian countries getting put down and France going tits up. These events were in 1940-1941
The Germans then did a silly thing by attacking the Soviet Union and by virtue of aggressors initiative managed to push pretty deep into the Motherland.

Then it all fell apart. In 1942, North Africa was stabilized and was swinging the way of the Allies. The med was wide open and the German Summer Offensive of 1942 hit the brick wall that was the Caucasus. By early 1943, the Germans were pretty much in full retreat or at least defensive posturing EVERYWHERE.

So really, the vaunted 'German Military' was only kicking anyones ass for about 3 years AT MOST and for 2 of those years were only fighting nations that didnt even know war was about to happen to them. The German military was about as effective strategically as a mugger in the night. Great at pounding down isolated and weak nations but terrible at fighting anyone else. The Germans certainly werent as powerful Naval wise as the UK....or even Ae ...





I have to disagree.
Hitler was why they expanded the war in Europe to the coasts of Africa, which they could more or less handle. He was also why they attacked Russia and had their cohorts pick on the US, which is what blew things out of hand.

If it was anyone else they probably would have avoided making so many strategic blunders.
Equipment and tactics wise tho, they had things well in hand even considering our prepared state.

They developed the blitz and paratrooper deployments into a science. They advanced the jet, the ballistic missile, the guided weapon, the assault rifle and the tank. When we wanted to modernize, it was their theories and gear we often ripped off.
Hell, we still read their books and use derivatives of their guns and vehicles.

The army we built in response was able to beat them, but that took years to create and only steamrolled a Germany weakened by bombings and blockades. Their original force made a mockery of the army we had.

If it wasn't for hitler then they'd probably have done alot more damage.

/I don't think the gap then is any less than if the modern US turned evil.
/eventually the world might bring us down and historians would say we were never that far ahead.
/but sitting in the moment, foreign generals of today would be dying with envy to command a force of similar capability.
 
2013-08-05 10:46:24 AM  
Not bad, but still a long way until we get to the Mark 1 variant.

wh40k.lexicanum.com
 
2013-08-05 10:47:02 AM  

way south: DirtyDeadGhostofEbenezerCooke: StoPPeRmobile: AngryDragon: HotIgneous Intruder: German Army helmets.
Interesting.

/Gott Mit Uns!

It is an interesting parallel.

[lh3.ggpht.com image 550x516]

farkers knew what they were doing.

Germans: great at making hats, terrible at winning wars.

Not that I disagree, but they did manage to hold off most of the world for the better part of a decade.

/But it turned out the idiot who got the war going was an idiot right on through to the end.
/Shouldn't take away from the fact that they were the most powerful army the world had ever seen.
/Everyone copied them.


They also lost the previous war.

Revised version:
Germans are great at making hats and fighting wars, but terrible at winning wars.
 
2013-08-05 11:48:51 AM  

way south: the assault rifle and the tank.


Yeah, no.
A certainCanadian American and a Russian tanker would like a word.
The Russians mastered the tank, and really developed combined arms into a science.
 
2013-08-05 12:22:29 PM  

demaL-demaL-yeH: way south: the assault rifle and the tank.

Yeah, no.
A certainCanadian American and a Russian tanker would like a word.
The Russians mastered the tank, and really developed combined arms into a science.


What Garand made was the first fielded self loading rifle (a battle rifle by today's standards), and the Germans shipped their first ar's before Kalashnikov left the hospital (hitler didn't like them, but he was always the idiot).
The intermediate cartridge in an automatic weapon is a German thing.

The German tactic of mixing dive bombers with their ground assault, as well as landing troops behind the lines to soften up targets, are what wrecked the frontlines established from the previous war.
Others mimicked these tactics, and maybe did it better in instances, but the Germans preceded them.

The Russians were able to overwhelm German armor with numbers, but when your best tank gets its kills by jamming itself under German tracks so his buddies can roll up to the sides then you'd have to question the quality of armor and firepower they really had.
 
2013-08-05 12:38:26 PM  
cl.jroo.me
 
2013-08-05 01:40:38 PM  
way south: demaL-demaL-yeH: way south: the assault rifle and the tank.

Yeah, no.
A certainCanadian American and a Russian tanker would like a word.
The Russians mastered the tank, and really developed combined arms into a science.

What Garand made was the first fielded self loading rifle (a battle rifle by today's standards), and the Germans shipped their first ar's before Kalashnikov left the hospital (hitler didn't like them, but he was always the idiot).
The intermediate cartridge in an automatic weapon is a German thing.


And their battle rifle was a farking bolt-action Mauser. And the M1 Carbine (and the selective-fire M2) was not German-inspired, either.     

The German tactic of mixing dive bombers with their ground assault, as well as landing troops behind the lines to soften up targets, are what wrecked the frontlines established from the previous war.
Others mimicked these tactics, and maybe did it better in instances, but the Germans preceded them.


It was the Russians who truly integrated artillery, air, armor, and infantry, not the Germans.    

The Russians were able to overwhelm German armor with numbers, but when your best tank gets its kills by jamming itself under German tracks so his buddies can roll up to the sides then you'd have to question the quality of armor and firepower they really had.


Rebuttal: Количество имеет свое собственное качество.
 
2013-08-05 04:08:34 PM  

demaL-demaL-yeH: way south: demaL-demaL-yeH: way south: the assault rifle and the tank.

Yeah, no.
A certainCanadian American and a Russian tanker would like a word.
The Russians mastered the tank, and really developed combined arms into a science.

What Garand made was the first fielded self loading rifle (a battle rifle by today's standards), and the Germans shipped their first ar's before Kalashnikov left the hospital (hitler didn't like them, but he was always the idiot).
The intermediate cartridge in an automatic weapon is a German thing.

And their battle rifle was a farking bolt-action Mauser. And the M1 Carbine (and the selective-fire M2) was not German-inspired, either.     

The German tactic of mixing dive bombers with their ground assault, as well as landing troops behind the lines to soften up targets, are what wrecked the frontlines established from the previous war.
Others mimicked these tactics, and maybe did it better in instances, but the Germans preceded them.

It was the Russians who truly integrated artillery, air, armor, and infantry, not the Germans.    

The Russians were able to overwhelm German armor with numbers, but when your best tank gets its kills by jamming itself under German tracks so his buddies can roll up to the sides then you'd have to question the quality of armor and firepower they really had.



Its only my opinion, but I'd argue its the Americans who truly integrated it all late in the war. We developed one of the first man portable radios and installed communications in damn near everything with a motor. Without the signal corps efforts you could be operating on information that was hours old.

It still stands that neither the US, Russians, nor most European states were early pioneers of combined arms. We were all taught a painful lesson by Germany.

Rebuttal: Количество имеет свое собственное качество.

True, but it only takes one bullet to stop a war.

/You just have to keep shooting till you find out which one it is.
 
2013-08-05 04:28:54 PM  

doglover: MFAWG: edmo: "Urgent requirement" and "2009." Yup , this is the government I work for.

Trying to make a one size fits all solution for  3 branches of the military maybe a little more complicated than it initially looks.

It's also silly to try.

Army and Marines having the same helmets, fine. They fill similar roles as infantry units. But when you have guys miles away in a boat, they don't need the same kind of helmet. They could wear speedos and tan butter for all the good a helmet is gonna do them if a naval weapon happens to impact where they're standing.


Not necessarily. One thing you want shipside is protection against splinters and shrapnel, which a helmet is great for.
 
2013-08-05 07:45:18 PM  
Subtle_Canary:

"by 1942 it could be claimed that the vastly under prepared US forces had either superiority in men and material or at least parity "

Citation needed!
 
2013-08-05 11:00:53 PM  

Medic Zero: doglover: MFAWG: edmo: "Urgent requirement" and "2009." Yup , this is the government I work for.

Trying to make a one size fits all solution for  3 branches of the military maybe a little more complicated than it initially looks.

It's also silly to try.

Army and Marines having the same helmets, fine. They fill similar roles as infantry units. But when you have guys miles away in a boat, they don't need the same kind of helmet. They could wear speedos and tan butter for all the good a helmet is gonna do them if a naval weapon happens to impact where they're standing.

Not necessarily. One thing you want shipside is protection against splinters and shrapnel, which a helmet is great for.


And both the original K-pots and the more recent helmets that the Marines are now to replace, might be very well suited for service afloat.  Their greater neck & ear coverage protects against more shrapnel. Meanwhile, I presume that TBI is far less of a risk aboard ship than it is in the ground forces, so that greater coverage doesn't have the downside for sailors that it does for soldiers & Marines.
 
Displayed 13 of 63 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


Report