If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Public Policy Polling)   Every Republican would beat Hillary in Alaska in 2016. Well, every Republican but that one we can and probably should just be ignoring   (publicpolicypolling.com) divider line 126
    More: Amusing, Republican, Alaskans, humans, Sean Parnell, Chris Christie, Rand Paul, MLB teams, George Zimmerman  
•       •       •

3545 clicks; posted to Politics » on 03 Aug 2013 at 8:38 AM (50 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



126 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-08-03 11:30:06 AM

baka-san: steveGswine: "-And finally 12% of Alaskans say they can see Russia from their houses to 87% who can't. That's comparable to the 11% who said they could see Russia when we polled on the question in 2010. "

And 97% of the 5% who say they are the 50% think there should be less than 25% (by mass) of chedder on Broccoli.

St dev +/- 35%


Yeah, but that's only 70% true 65% time with 60% of the population.
 
2013-08-03 11:30:23 AM

Tman144: UNC_Samurai: Virtuoso80: Linux_Yes: Give it up Pugs, your game is over.

there will be a Democrat in the White House in 2017.


how do you like them apples??

Okay, but can we make a Democrat other than Hillary?

Sure, the thing this country needs most is President Elizabeth Warren.  A healthy dose of Louis Brandeis crossed with some Rooseveltian trust-busting?  YES, PLEASE!

I don't know about that. I like Warren, but I think she got her start in politics a little too late to be president. I think she'll do just fine in the Senate for a while. Hillary has more connections (i.e. Blackmail) to get things done in Washington. We tried the hope and change thing, we got no change, and I have no hope. I think Hillary would be a more effective president. Between Carter and Obama I think it is conclusively proven that in order to get things done as president, you have to be an asshole/jackass. Nice guys finish last and all that.


How do Obama's detractors declare "we got no change" while the republicans assert he's the most socialist president who ever libbed who's destroying America.

I believe the country would be different if McCain had been president for these last four years. That's change enough for me. The change we can only hope for us incremental.
 
2013-08-03 11:34:47 AM

js34603: You know a good time to start worrying about the 2016 elections? 20 farking 16.
And when I start worrying about it, who Alaska is going to vote for won't be very high on the list of things to worry about.


Iowa will probably push their election caucuses back to 2015. They talked about and almost did move 2012 to Dec. 2011.
 
2013-08-03 11:35:28 AM

GhostFish: homelessdude: To: Comedy Gods
From: America
Delivery Date: 2016
Subject: Request For Pure Political Comedy Gold.
CC: GOP, TeaParty
BCC: Comedy Central

See attached.

[i.imgur.com image 600x399]

Despite their similarities, I can't help but shake the feeling that these two women really don't like each other.


There's only room for one batshiat-crazy teatard in the Republican spank bank.
 
2013-08-03 11:38:53 AM

JOHN MCENROE MY CHILDHOOD NEMESIS: Thats some weapons grade trolling going on up there.


Alaska is pretty white and rural, are you certain it's trolling?
 
2013-08-03 11:40:46 AM

tenpoundsofcheese: keylock71: Pick: Trying to wrap my head around the idea that ANYONE would vote for Hillary in any kind of election. After her performance at the Benghazi hearings, what kind of moron would vote for such a loose cannon?

Awwww, still trying to beat that dead horse, huh?

That fact that you referred to our Ambassador and the three other people who died that night as horses is terrible.


Exactly! Don't people know the proper way to honor them is to use them as political props to try and score points against the other party!
 
2013-08-03 11:40:47 AM

mongbiohazard: That is farking rich. I love that news so much I want to buy it flowers and take it out to dinner.


Approves.

marquinhohotel.com.br
 
2013-08-03 11:44:21 AM
Four-thirds of Alaskans can't do math good.
 
2013-08-03 11:47:48 AM

Virtuoso80: Linux_Yes: Give it up Pugs, your game is over.

there will be a Democrat in the White House in 2017.

how do you like them apples??

Okay, but can we make a Democrat other than Hillary?


Nope...not yours: 16 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Will Win 2016

Hint: written by a conservative, life-long Republican. Bottom line? They've already thrown in the towel.

/lots of arguable points in that link, and more than one outright error, but still worthy reading
 
2013-08-03 11:49:57 AM

Esc7: Tman144: UNC_Samurai: Virtuoso80: Linux_Yes: Give it up Pugs, your game is over.

there will be a Democrat in the White House in 2017.


how do you like them apples??

Okay, but can we make a Democrat other than Hillary?

Sure, the thing this country needs most is President Elizabeth Warren.  A healthy dose of Louis Brandeis crossed with some Rooseveltian trust-busting?  YES, PLEASE!

I don't know about that. I like Warren, but I think she got her start in politics a little too late to be president. I think she'll do just fine in the Senate for a while. Hillary has more connections (i.e. Blackmail) to get things done in Washington. We tried the hope and change thing, we got no change, and I have no hope. I think Hillary would be a more effective president. Between Carter and Obama I think it is conclusively proven that in order to get things done as president, you have to be an asshole/jackass. Nice guys finish last and all that.

How do Obama's detractors declare "we got no change" while the republicans assert he's the most socialist president who ever libbed who's destroying America.

I believe the country would be different if McCain had been president for these last four years. That's change enough for me. The change we can only hope for us incremental.


Don't get me wrong. I still like Obama as a person, I just don't think he's been a very effective president. My regret is not in voting for Obama in the general. My regret is in not voting for Hillary in the primary.

Honestly, I don't think we've even had incremental change. I think we've regressed. I'm reminded of the cartoon where the republican says to Obama, I'll take a step if you take a step, so Obama takes a step forward, and the republican takes a step back.
 
2013-08-03 12:32:56 PM

Tman144: Don't get me wrong. I still like Obama as a person, I just don't think he's been a very effective president. My regret is not in voting for Obama in the general. My regret is in not voting for Hillary in the primary.


You honestly think that Hillary would have been better able to work with the congressional Republicans? That's a fascinating assertion, I'd love to hear your reasoning on that.
 
2013-08-03 12:34:53 PM
Why bother doing Presidential Polling in a deep red state whose results are already a foregone conclusion? I'd be more interested in polling on their 2014 Senate Race, that's the one that's going to be competitive.
 
2013-08-03 12:35:02 PM
Why would Hillary run for Governor of Alaska?

/Hardy har har har.
 
2013-08-03 12:36:40 PM

Monkeyhouse Zendo: Tman144: Don't get me wrong. I still like Obama as a person, I just don't think he's been a very effective president. My regret is not in voting for Obama in the general. My regret is in not voting for Hillary in the primary.

You honestly think that Hillary would have been better able to work with the congressional Republicans? That's a fascinating assertion, I'd love to hear your reasoning on that.


To me the key difference is that Hillary is a cold-blooded killer who would have taken the fight to the GOP more aggressively than has Obama.

That said, I campaigned for and vote for Hillary in '08, and will do so again for '16, and I think she will be a better next president than had she been elected in '08.
 
2013-08-03 12:36:59 PM

Thrag: tenpoundsofcheese: keylock71: Pick: Trying to wrap my head around the idea that ANYONE would vote for Hillary in any kind of election. After her performance at the Benghazi hearings, what kind of moron would vote for such a loose cannon?

Awwww, still trying to beat that dead horse, huh?

That fact that you referred to our Ambassador and the three other people who died that night as horses is terrible.

Exactly! Don't people know the proper way to honor them is to use them as political props to try and score points against the other party!


www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com
 
2013-08-03 12:46:03 PM
I hope Hillary is the next President, because we'll immediately save 23% of the President's salary and Bill Clinton will officially be the First Lady.
 
2013-08-03 12:49:00 PM

spman: Why bother doing Presidential Polling in a deep red state whose results are already a foregone conclusion? I'd be more interested in polling on their 2014 Senate Race, that's the one that's going to be competitive.


The senate polling was their main goal. Polling firms tend to throw on a lot of side questions when they are doing their work since if somebody is willing to answer one question, they'll probably be willing to answer more.

Also, PPP in particular has a habit of asking some pretty silly side questions, like "can you see Russia from your house?"
 
2013-08-03 12:51:13 PM

Stone Meadow: Virtuoso80: Linux_Yes: Give it up Pugs, your game is over.

there will be a Democrat in the White House in 2017.

how do you like them apples??

Okay, but can we make a Democrat other than Hillary?

Nope...not yours: 16 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Will Win 2016

Hint: written by a conservative, life-long Republican. Bottom line? They've already thrown in the towel.

/lots of arguable points in that link, and more than one outright error, but still worthy reading


I'm used to disappointment in politics. My one hope it that Hillary is a political creature, so if the public puts enough pressure on her on certain issues (data collection, drone strikes), she'll likely see the writing on the wall and go along with it. I mean, obviously she's not going to be defending DOMA anymore, right?
 
2013-08-03 12:56:09 PM

Stone Meadow: Virtuoso80: Linux_Yes: Give it up Pugs, your game is over.

there will be a Democrat in the White House in 2017.

how do you like them apples??

Okay, but can we make a Democrat other than Hillary?

Nope...not yours: 16 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Will Win 2016

Hint: written by a conservative, life-long Republican. Bottom line? They've already thrown in the towel.

/lots of arguable points in that link, and more than one outright error, but still worthy reading


Reads like it's from a conservative, just full of projections. The conservative fear and loathing of Hillary is palpable. She won't win the primary and she knows it. She'll play king (or queen) maker and will help the Democratic party pick a top-notch candidate, and that person will be female.
 
2013-08-03 01:04:02 PM
Having traveled to Alaska many times and with numerous friends there, I can say confidently that most Alaskans hate Palin. They see her as a sell-out and supreme narcissist and giving their state a bad name. She has very low support even around Palmer and Wasilla (where she lives). She is basically reviled in Anchorage and up and down the Kenai peninsula.
 
2013-08-03 01:11:10 PM
If Hillary gets elected, make sure she has Life Alert in the oval office.

3.bp.blogspot.com
 
2013-08-03 01:18:13 PM

dericwater: Stone Meadow: /lots of arguable points in that link, and more than one outright error, but still worthy reading

Reads like it's from a conservative, just full of projections. The conservative fear and loathing of Hillary is palpable. She won't win the primary and she knows it. She'll play king (or queen) maker and will help the Democratic party pick a top-notch candidate, and that person will be female.


Speaking of projection, this is laughable.
 
2013-08-03 01:22:53 PM

Vectron: If Hillary gets elected, make sure she has Life Alert in the oval office.

[3.bp.blogspot.com image 400x312]


In 2016 she'll still be younger than McCain was in 2008.  And younger than Reagan was in 1980.
 
2013-08-03 01:28:55 PM

dericwater: Stone Meadow: Virtuoso80: Linux_Yes: Give it up Pugs, your game is over.

there will be a Democrat in the White House in 2017.

how do you like them apples??

Okay, but can we make a Democrat other than Hillary?

Nope...not yours: 16 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Will Win 2016

Hint: written by a conservative, life-long Republican. Bottom line? They've already thrown in the towel.

/lots of arguable points in that link, and more than one outright error, but still worthy reading

Reads like it's from a conservative, just full of projections. The conservative fear and loathing of Hillary is palpable. She won't win the primary and she knows it. She'll play king (or queen) maker and will help the Democratic party pick a top-notch candidate, and that person will be female.


Wow, you're totally right, but since I'm self-destructive idiot with terrible judgement, what do you say we bet $1000 on it?
 
2013-08-03 01:42:04 PM

GhostFish: homelessdude: To: Comedy Gods
From: America
Delivery Date: 2016
Subject: Request For Pure Political Comedy Gold.
CC: GOP, TeaParty
BCC: Comedy Central

See attached.

[i.imgur.com image 600x399]

Despite their similarities, I can't help but shake the feeling that these two women really don't like each other.


I don't think any politicians like Palin other than those who use her to get free air time. Her actual work seems to be extending her 15 minutes of fame as opposed to actually assisting others. While people will point to her doing speeches for candidates, at the same time I did read an article showing her actual involvement. It basically detailed how she comes in at the last minute when the race is all but decided or the polls are showing a win. (I have to find that article again...it was a good one.).Then she gloms on to the Tea Party candidate with the same old sorry lines that the same old sorry news outlets cover because they are interested in ad sales, and not actual news. Palin keeps people glued to the TV. Budget overruns don't.
 
2013-08-03 01:53:59 PM

Stone Meadow: Virtuoso80: Linux_Yes: Give it up Pugs, your game is over.

there will be a Democrat in the White House in 2017.

how do you like them apples??

Okay, but can we make a Democrat other than Hillary?

Nope...not yours: 16 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Will Win 2016

Hint: written by a conservative, life-long Republican. Bottom line? They've already thrown in the towel.

/lots of arguable points in that link, and more than one outright error, but still worthy reading


The one and only reason why Hilary is never going to be President: if you think people voted against McCain because of his health...
 
2013-08-03 01:57:24 PM

Virtuoso80: dericwater: Stone Meadow: Virtuoso80: Linux_Yes: Give it up Pugs, your game is over.

there will be a Democrat in the White House in 2017.

how do you like them apples??

Okay, but can we make a Democrat other than Hillary?

Nope...not yours: 16 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Will Win 2016

Hint: written by a conservative, life-long Republican. Bottom line? They've already thrown in the towel.

/lots of arguable points in that link, and more than one outright error, but still worthy reading

Reads like it's from a conservative, just full of projections. The conservative fear and loathing of Hillary is palpable. She won't win the primary and she knows it. She'll play king (or queen) maker and will help the Democratic party pick a top-notch candidate, and that person will be female.

Wow, you're totally right, but since I'm self-destructive idiot with terrible judgement, what do you say we bet $1000 on it?


$10 and I'm on.
 
2013-08-03 01:58:34 PM

gameshowhost: Vectron: If Hillary gets elected, make sure she has Life Alert in the oval office.

[3.bp.blogspot.com image 400x312]

In 2016 she'll still be younger than McCain was in 2008.  And younger than Reagan was in 1980.


People age at different speeds.
 
2013-08-03 02:18:34 PM

LoneWolf343: Stone Meadow: Virtuoso80: Linux_Yes: Give it up Pugs, your game is over.

there will be a Democrat in the White House in 2017.

how do you like them apples??

Okay, but can we make a Democrat other than Hillary?

Nope...not yours: 16 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Will Win 2016

Hint: written by a conservative, life-long Republican. Bottom line? They've already thrown in the towel.

/lots of arguable points in that link, and more than one outright error, but still worthy reading

The one and only reason why Hilary is never going to be President: if you think people voted against McCain because of his health...


Well, considering he drafted his running mate from the cast of "Toddlers and Tiaras," his health was a big issue, but I agree that it wasn't the only reason he didn't win.
 
2013-08-03 02:18:37 PM
Warren/Booker '16
 
2013-08-03 02:40:36 PM
And? Alaska has voted Republican since the last ice age.
 
2013-08-03 02:41:21 PM

LoneWolf343: gameshowhost: Vectron: If Hillary gets elected, make sure she has Life Alert in the oval office.

[3.bp.blogspot.com image 400x312]

In 2016 she'll still be younger than McCain was in 2008.  And younger than Reagan was in 1980.

People age at different speeds.


In that case, her real age will be even younger yet, compared to Cancer Boy and The Alzheimer's.
 
2013-08-03 02:41:34 PM

The Downfall: Warren/Booker '16


Not likely. Need to have at least one with some gravitas.
 
2013-08-03 02:55:08 PM

keylock71: Pick: Trying to wrap my head around the idea that ANYONE would vote for Hillary in any kind of election. After her performance at the Benghazi hearings, what kind of moron would vote for such a loose cannon?

Awwww, still trying to beat that dead horse, huh?


anyone who hates the american taliban?
I would vote for a pedophile before voting for what the GOP laughingly calls a qualified candidate.
Ok, maybe not that far.

HELL, McCain was interesting right up until he pick shiat4brains as his running mate. The GOP has only gone further off the rails since then!
 
2013-08-03 02:59:17 PM
The Palins are floating the idea of Sarah running for senate soon.  I can't say that the idea has been met with thunderous applause, but AK is a very, very red state with some clever new redistricting and more redistricting on the way. I think she'd probably win. Hell, she'd probably win even if most people voted against her.
 
2013-08-03 03:07:05 PM

Esc7: Hillary's myth of inevitability will be her undoing.

Today's electorate has been too manipulated for novelty and sensationalism to accept a Reagan - Bush style succession.

Politicians have become more like characters in a drama and people will be bored with Hillary.


Yes - No - Sort of

2008
Hillary lost in 2008 because she thought she was a sure thing. She was in coast mode, worrying only about swing states. Candidate Obama's 50 state, grass roots, small dollar donation, internet campaign caught both her and the GOP unprepared.
She thought she was inevitable.

2016
We have a different ball game. Currently there is no Democrat other than Hillary on the Stage.
Biden? Does he want the job? How old will he be? Will he really want to RUN?

The Electorate
The electorate is bored/tired? LOL
GOP voters will never vote a DEM.
DEM voters will never vote for a GOP.
Either way, the election will be close, with the winner going to whomever gets out the vote.
Especially the minority and female vote.

Wildcard
The real wildcard is not even on the table yet. Either part could produce an unexpected, charismatic candidate. Reagan, Bill Clinton and Barak Obama were just that kind of candidate.

Guess
My guess is that Hillary would win against the current suite of GOP contenders and leftovers from 2012.

Worst Nightmare - 2016
The economy has recovered. The moron electorates have forgotten the Bush Years and the Obama Recovery and vote for more spending and less taxes and we get yet another insane tax cut-and-spend GOP president.
 
2013-08-03 03:07:59 PM

Pick: Trying to wrap my head around the idea that ANYONE would vote for Hillary Republicans in any kind of election. After her their performance at the Benghazi hearings, what kind of moron would vote for such a loose cannon hyper partisan, outrage-manufacturing, do-nothing asshats?


FTFY.
 
2013-08-03 03:08:20 PM

gadian: The Palins are floating the idea of Sarah running for senate soon.  I can't say that the idea has been met with thunderous applause, but AK is a very, very red state with some clever new redistricting and more redistricting on the way. I think she'd probably win. Hell, she'd probably win even if most people voted against her.


Six years is a long time to a quitter who couldn't handle four years as governor. My guess would be the Palins are floating the idea of Sarah running for the Senate to fleece the rubes.
 
2013-08-03 03:08:52 PM

gadian: The Palins are floating the idea of Sarah running for senate soon.  I can't say that the idea has been met with thunderous applause, but AK is a very, very red state with some clever new redistricting and more redistricting on the way. I think she'd probably win. Hell, she'd probably win even if most people voted against her.


um
you do know that senate races are state wide and no amount of redistricting matters? right?
 
2013-08-03 03:09:47 PM

LoneWolf343: gameshowhost: Vectron: If Hillary gets elected, make sure she has Life Alert in the oval office.

[3.bp.blogspot.com image 400x312]

In 2016 she'll still be younger than McCain was in 2008.  And younger than Reagan was in 1980.

People age at different speeds.


Yeah, sure, that's a valid point.

3.bp.blogspot.com
 
2013-08-03 03:12:18 PM

quatchi: Pick: Trying to wrap my head around the idea that ANYONE would vote for Hillary Republicans in any kind of election. After her their performance at the Benghazi hearings, what kind of moron would vote for such a loose cannon hyper partisan, outrage-manufacturing, do-nothing asshats?

FTFY.


THIS
 
2013-08-03 03:19:42 PM

Monkeyhouse Zendo: Tman144: Don't get me wrong. I still like Obama as a person, I just don't think he's been a very effective president. My regret is not in voting for Obama in the general. My regret is in not voting for Hillary in the primary.

You honestly think that Hillary would have been better able to work with the congressional Republicans? That's a fascinating assertion, I'd love to hear your reasoning on that.


I don't think Hillary would "work" with congressional republicans at all, I said she would have been more effective. Obama has given concession after concession to republicans and gotten exactly jack shiat in return, whereas I think Hillary would have been playing hardball right out of the gate. There was a lot of wasted opportunity during the first two years of Obama's presidency. Oh well, live and learn I guess.
 
2013-08-03 03:23:09 PM

namatad: Esc7: Hillary's myth of inevitability will be her undoing.

Today's electorate has been too manipulated for novelty and sensationalism to accept a Reagan - Bush style succession.

Politicians have become more like characters in a drama and people will be bored with Hillary.

Yes - No - Sort of

2008
Hillary lost in 2008 because she thought she was a sure thing. She was in coast mode, worrying only about swing states. Candidate Obama's 50 state, grass roots, small dollar donation, internet campaign caught both her and the GOP unprepared.
She thought she was inevitable.

2016
We have a different ball game. Currently there is no Democrat other than Hillary on the Stage.
Biden? Does he want the job? How old will he be? Will he really want to RUN?

The Electorate
The electorate is bored/tired? LOL
GOP voters will never vote a DEM.
DEM voters will never vote for a GOP.
Either way, the election will be close, with the winner going to whomever gets out the vote.
Especially the minority and female vote.

Wildcard
The real wildcard is not even on the table yet. Either part could produce an unexpected, charismatic candidate. Reagan, Bill Clinton and Barak Obama were just that kind of candidate.

Guess
My guess is that Hillary would win against the current suite of GOP contenders and leftovers from 2012.

Worst Nightmare - 2016
The economy has recovered. The moron electorates have forgotten the Bush Years and the Obama Recovery and vote for more spending and less taxes and we get yet another insane tax cut-and-spend GOP president.


It will be interesting to see if the next GOP primary is a derpfest like the last one.  Right now, Santorum has the advantage over any challenger, since he managed to stay in the primaries 'til the end, and he has a nation-wide campaign organization for the next race (the same way McCain and Romney started off with the advantage of having run past campaigns prior to getting nominated).

So any Republican who gets in the race for '16 will start out trailing Santorum. . .
 
2013-08-03 03:23:28 PM

gadian: The Palins are floating the idea of Sarah running for senate soon.  I can't say that the idea has been met with thunderous applause, but AK is a very, very red state with some clever new redistricting and more redistricting on the way. I think she'd probably win. Hell, she'd probably win even if most people voted against her.


Oh that would be fantastic, if only to witness the spectacle of the senior Republican Senator campaigning against the Republican candidate for the other US Senate seat.
 
2013-08-03 03:41:45 PM

Tman144: Monkeyhouse Zendo: Tman144: Don't get me wrong. I still like Obama as a person, I just don't think he's been a very effective president. My regret is not in voting for Obama in the general. My regret is in not voting for Hillary in the primary.

You honestly think that Hillary would have been better able to work with the congressional Republicans? That's a fascinating assertion, I'd love to hear your reasoning on that.

I don't think Hillary would "work" with congressional republicans at all, I said she would have been more effective. Obama has given concession after concession to republicans and gotten exactly jack shiat in return, whereas I think Hillary would have been playing hardball right out of the gate. There was a lot of wasted opportunity during the first two years of Obama's presidency. Oh well, live and learn I guess.


From what I remember, Hillary caught flak during the '08 primaries because she'd voted along with Republicans in support of the Iraq War and the Patriot Act; had she not been planning on running for president, she could've easily voted against both, and New Yorkers would've gladly reelected her to the Senate.  Granted, I'd vote for her, particularly since the odds are the GOP will nominate someone further to the right than Romney or McCain, but I'm a bit less optimistic about her playing hardball right out of the gate.
 
2013-08-03 03:43:58 PM

HighOnCraic: LoneWolf343: gameshowhost: Vectron: If Hillary gets elected, make sure she has Life Alert in the oval office.

[3.bp.blogspot.com image 400x312]

In 2016 she'll still be younger than McCain was in 2008.  And younger than Reagan was in 1980.

People age at different speeds.

Yeah, sure, that's a valid point.

[3.bp.blogspot.com image 400x261]


If you don't take her recent breakdown as evidence that she isn't healthy enough to be president, then I have a bridge to sell you.
 
2013-08-03 04:04:53 PM

HighOnCraic: So any Republican who gets in the race for '16 will start out trailing Santorum. . .


You sick bastard.
 
2013-08-03 04:39:00 PM

LoneWolf343: Stone Meadow: Virtuoso80: Okay, but can we make a Democrat other than Hillary?

Nope...not yours: 16 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Will Win 2016

The one and only reason why Hilary is never going to be President: if you think people voted against McCain because of his health...


See...there's the rub. I don't know of ANYONE who voted against McCain because of his health.
 
2013-08-03 05:18:13 PM

Curious: jake_lex: King Something: So Hillary Clinton isn't leading against some potential GOP candidates in polls 39 months away from the next presidential election, and the polls in question are of the people living in the world's fourth-largest expanse of open tundra.

Meanwhile, in the parts of  the country where the population is a bit higher than "rounding error," those GOP candidates, and the GOP itself for that matter, have a popularity rating of somewhere between "broccoli" and "cabbage."

I'd also point out that the candidate that does the best in this poll doesn't have a chance in hell of getting through the primaries.  The teabaggers will never forgive Chris Christie for working with President Obama after his state suffered a disaster, and he's been taking on their hero RAND PAUL lately.

and RAND PAUL doesn't have a chance of getting elected. like his dad he is just too kooky. folks may like his stand on this or that but in toto he doesn't measure up. and a primary battle between him and ted cruz would damage both of them.


Randy's problem is that he'd have to spend the entire general walking back the stupid shiat he said in the primary. As people repeatedly point out that his policies would result in a dog-eat-dog dystopia, he would wind up spending all his time explaining how everyone apparently has perfect knowledge and "it jus does, okay?"

You really shouldn't run for national office if your political theory can be dismantled by a reasonably bright 12 year old.
 
2013-08-03 05:52:16 PM
I'm excited to see Hillary run...
www.familiesfirst.ie
 
Displayed 50 of 126 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report