Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Washington Times)   "Democrats' 'war on women' boomerangs as Obama, top leaders fail to condemn bad boy behavior." Or in other words, Republicans want to ban abortion. Democrats want to get you pregnant   (washingtontimes.com ) divider line
    More: Obvious, California Democrat, Josh Earnest, leaders fail, humans, Roman Catholic theology, Georgetown University Law School, abortions, Anthony Weiner  
•       •       •

765 clicks; posted to Politics » on 01 Aug 2013 at 10:09 AM (2 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



103 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-08-01 08:44:11 AM  
Top Democratic leadership not involving itself in lower-tier candidate's scandals, which is exactly the same thing as trying to shut down every abortion clinic in Texas.  Ok, yeah.
 
2013-08-01 08:49:03 AM  
A couple of scumbags doesn't equal the systematic policy proposals by the GOP that get the government more involved in their medical decisions, their personal decisions, or their offensively dismissive rhetoric towards rape.
 
2013-08-01 09:04:06 AM  
Did I miss where Obama and the Democrats proposed legislation that guys must share pictures of their junk or behave like they're on Mad Men?
 
2013-08-01 09:09:59 AM  

Diogenes: Did I miss where Obama and the Democrats proposed legislation that guys must share pictures of their junk or behave like they're on Mad Men?


Yes. It was buried in last year's budget.
 
2013-08-01 09:10:41 AM  

Diogenes: Did I miss where Obama and the Democrats proposed legislation that guys must share pictures of their junk or behave like they're on Mad Men?


i.imgur.com
 
2013-08-01 09:11:41 AM  
Of course Democrats want you to get pregnant.  More pregnancy means more abortions.
 
2013-08-01 09:13:49 AM  

serial_crusher: Of course Democrats want you to get pregnant.  More pregnancy means more abortions.


Dude, you haven't lived until you've had Pelosi's abortion soup.
 
2013-08-01 09:14:34 AM  

serial_crusher: Of course Democrats want you to get pregnant.  More pregnancy means more abortions.


encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com
 
2013-08-01 09:16:37 AM  
To sum it up, you get a free pass to sexually harass as many women as you want as long as you also propose legislation to allow widespread abortion.
 
2013-08-01 09:17:00 AM  
Personal actions vs. Policy changes
Dems will screw 7 women and GOP will screw millions
 
2013-08-01 09:28:34 AM  

Aarontology: serial_crusher: Of course Democrats want you to get pregnant.  More pregnancy means more abortions.

Dude, you haven't lived until you've had Pelosi's abortion soup.


It's great stuff. I buy it in bulk at Costco.
 
2013-08-01 09:39:01 AM  
One party has some people who want to seduce you.

One party has lots of people who want to force you to get something inserted into yourself before you can get a legal medical procedure.

I'm sorry, how is this even close to both sides being bad?
 
2013-08-01 09:43:04 AM  

SlothB77: To sum it up, you get a free pass to sexually harass as many women as you want as long as you also propose legislation to allow widespread abortion.


Who got a free pass?
 
2013-08-01 09:43:41 AM  

www.copquest.com
What the War on Women Boomerang may look like

 
2013-08-01 09:44:40 AM  

Diogenes: [www.copquest.com image 321x202]
What the War on Women Boomerang may look like


www.instructables.com
 
2013-08-01 09:47:06 AM  

Bloody William: I'm sorry, how is this even close to both sides being bad?


Well, how would YOU defend the indefensible?
 
2013-08-01 09:47:41 AM  

James!: Diogenes: [www.copquest.com image 321x202]
What the War on Women Boomerang may look like

[www.instructables.com image 850x637]


Ah.  Touche!
 
2013-08-01 09:52:46 AM  

BunkoSquad: Bloody William: I'm sorry, how is this even close to both sides being bad?

Well, how would YOU defend the indefensible?


I think I would focus more on what currently existing human beings are doing. A guillotine sounds pretty good right about now.
 
2013-08-01 09:53:00 AM  
yes, forcing the rape of a woman with a plastic wand is the same as sending her a picture of your junk.
 
2013-08-01 09:57:34 AM  

James!: SlothB77: To sum it up, you get a free pass to sexually harass as many women as you want as long as you also propose legislation to allow widespread abortion.

Who got a free pass?


SlothB77 - He never responds to his challengers.  As is its right here on Fark as you well know.  But it's tiresome and I think I'm done with it.
 
2013-08-01 09:59:14 AM  

Diogenes: James!: SlothB77: To sum it up, you get a free pass to sexually harass as many women as you want as long as you also propose legislation to allow widespread abortion.

Who got a free pass?

SlothB77 - He never responds to his challengers.  As is its right here on Fark as you well know.  But it's tiresome and I think I'm done with it.


Meh. He's harmless if you know his schtick.
 
2013-08-01 10:02:12 AM  
bdub77: Well, I had to Farkie you in a different color because if I read too quickly I get your handles confused ;-)
 
2013-08-01 10:14:58 AM  
Did Freep Friday come early?
 
2013-08-01 10:15:57 AM  

b77: Meh. He's harmless if you know his schtick.


hmmmmmmmm
 
2013-08-01 10:16:26 AM  

James!: SlothB77: To sum it up, you get a free pass to sexually harass as many women as you want as long as you also propose legislation to allow widespread abortion.

Who got a free pass?


Free pass in the sense that you can still get elected to public office as a pro-women's rights candidate even while being a complete sleaze.  No different than "family values" conservatives getting elected after cheating on their wives, really.  Though part of me thinks that banging a lot of chicks is actually helping the cause by allowing more women to feel sexually liberated.
 
2013-08-01 10:17:04 AM  
farm3.static.flickr.com
 
2013-08-01 10:18:06 AM  
Nothing Anthony Weiner has done is illegal. Unseemly, sure, but not illegal. And his wife is standing by him, so what's the problem here?

Bob Filner, OTOH, almost certainly could be charged with multiple counts of sexual assault, and the San Diego City Council recognizes this and has unanimously voted to prevent city funds from paying his legal fees.

None of this compares to the Republicans in state legislatures and executive offices enshrining into law legal treatment of women as subhuman morons who are completely incapable of making independent decisions regarding their bodily autonomy.
 
2013-08-01 10:19:27 AM  
I was just glad to know that Monica Lewinsky was ahead of her time, recording a sexy voicemail from Bill long before sexting became cool.
 
2013-08-01 10:20:44 AM  

Shaggy_C: Free pass in the sense that you can still get elected to public office as a pro-women's rights candidate even while being a complete sleaze.


Like...Elliot Spitz...no...Anthony Wei..no....who?
 
2013-08-01 10:21:23 AM  
Didn't democratic leadership come out and say "Weiner, please stop running"?
 
2013-08-01 10:21:43 AM  

Diogenes: Did I miss where Obama and the Democrats proposed legislation that guys must share pictures of their junk or behave like they're on Mad Men?


i301.photobucket.com

/I'm kidding. Just wanted to use the GIF
 
2013-08-01 10:22:04 AM  

Shaggy_C: James!: SlothB77: To sum it up, you get a free pass to sexually harass as many women as you want as long as you also propose legislation to allow widespread abortion.

Who got a free pass?

Free pass in the sense that you can still get elected to public office as a pro-women's rights candidate even while being a complete sleaze.  No different than "family values" conservatives getting elected after cheating on their wives, really.  Though part of me thinks that banging a lot of chicks is actually helping the cause by allowing more women to feel sexually liberated.


I still want to know about why that Mayor in San Diego(?) thought it was sexual to put women in headlocks?  I get the pinching the bottoms, staring at boobs, and making employment contingent on sexual favors.  But head locks?  Not sexy.
 
2013-08-01 10:24:09 AM  

SlothB77: To sum it up, you get a free pass to sexually harass as many women as you want as long as you also propose legislation to allow widespread abortion.


I am not sure the Mayor of San Diego can propose that...
 
2013-08-01 10:25:37 AM  

Shaggy_C: James!: SlothB77: To sum it up, you get a free pass to sexually harass as many women as you want as long as you also propose legislation to allow widespread abortion.

Who got a free pass?

Free pass in the sense that you can still get elected to public office as a pro-women's rights candidate even while being a complete sleaze.  No different than "family values" conservatives getting elected after cheating on their wives, really.  Though part of me thinks that banging a lot of chicks is actually helping the cause by allowing more women to feel sexually liberated.


We'll see if they get elected.  I'm not voting for either of them for various reasons.

I don't see what Spitzer or Wiener did as harassment, in both those situations the female involved was a consensual partner.
 
2013-08-01 10:25:37 AM  
That's the weakest shiat I've read this week.
 
2013-08-01 10:27:38 AM  

I_C_Weener: Shaggy_C: James!: SlothB77: To sum it up, you get a free pass to sexually harass as many women as you want as long as you also propose legislation to allow widespread abortion.

Who got a free pass?

Free pass in the sense that you can still get elected to public office as a pro-women's rights candidate even while being a complete sleaze.  No different than "family values" conservatives getting elected after cheating on their wives, really.  Though part of me thinks that banging a lot of chicks is actually helping the cause by allowing more women to feel sexually liberated.

I still want to know about why that Mayor in San Diego(?) thought it was sexual to put women in headlocks?  I get the pinching the bottoms, staring at boobs, and making employment contingent on sexual favors.  But head locks?  Not sexy.


Well, feet aren't sexy either but people are into it. And don't even get me started on that weird balloon fetish.

Anyways, sure democrats want to fark women. The difference between the parties is that only the Dems seem to enjoy sex where the woman isn't crying afterwards.
 
2013-08-01 10:27:55 AM  

James!: SlothB77: To sum it up, you get a free pass to sexually harass as many women as you want as long as you also propose legislation to allow widespread abortion.

Who got a free pass?


House Minority Leader Anthony Weiner
 
2013-08-01 10:28:12 AM  

limeyfellow: SlothB77: To sum it up, you get a free pass to sexually harass as many women as you want as long as you also propose legislation to allow widespread abortion.

I am not sure the Mayor of San Diego can propose that...


Given his behavior I could see him proposing abortion on an 'individual level' if you know what I mean.  Though I can't see any woman responding to those advances.
 
2013-08-01 10:28:34 AM  

Serious Black: Nothing Anthony Weiner has done is illegal. Unseemly, sure, but not illegal. And his wife is standing by him, so what's the problem here?

Bob Filner, OTOH, almost certainly could be charged with multiple counts of sexual assault, and the San Diego City Council recognizes this and has unanimously voted to prevent city funds from paying his legal fees.

None of this compares to the Republicans in state legislatures and executive offices enshrining into law legal treatment of women as subhuman morons who are completely incapable of making independent decisions regarding their bodily autonomy.


I really wonder if his wife is not only okay with it, but if they're perhaps swingers. Because, strangely enough, if word got out that they had an open marriage or were sexually experimental, it would be even MORE damaging to Weiner's political career than this horrible joke Carlos Danger has become.

Everyone's fine if things go according to plan, even if that plan is horrifying. A politician cheats on his wife? Happens all the time. A politician and his wife have an unconventional sex life that is mutual? Utterly and entirely scandalous.
 
2013-08-01 10:29:43 AM  

Relatively Obscure: That's the weakest shiat I've read this week.


The day's not over. And based upon the 97 links we've had so far, it's sure to be a "fun" one.
 
2013-08-01 10:30:33 AM  

Mentat: Top Democratic leadership not involving itself in lower-tier candidate's scandals, which is exactly the same thing as trying to shut down every abortion clinic in Texas.  Ok, yeah.


Yup. Especially with Weiner being a presently elected official and all.

What a clownshoes scandal; this guy is about as relevant DNC as Tucker Carlson is to anyone.

For the record I'd be happy if both exited public life forever and just lived a quiet existence without getting into the press like the rest of us. I just listed Carlson as someone you used to hear a lot about who disappeared after getting pwned in public; I might merely be unaware of what he's up to now but I'd also like to be similarly unreminded of the existence of Anthony Weiner.
 
2013-08-01 10:31:24 AM  

Shaggy_C: James!: SlothB77: To sum it up, you get a free pass to sexually harass as many women as you want as long as you also propose legislation to allow widespread abortion.

Who got a free pass?

Free pass in the sense that you can still get elected to public office as a pro-women's rights candidate even while being a complete sleaze.  No different than "family values" conservatives getting elected after cheating on their wives, really.  Though part of me thinks that banging a lot of chicks is actually helping the cause by allowing more women to feel sexually liberated.


Who has been elected on a pro-women's rights platform while objectifying women? My mind is drawing a complete blank.

In contrast, there absolutely have been a number of conservatives elected on a family values platform after it became public that they were defiling their families. Mark Sanford and David Vitter both immediately spring to mind as national cases. There's also the case of Daniel Stout, a guy who won a special election in Georgia even though he had cheated on his first wife with her mother while his then-wife was pregnant.
 
2013-08-01 10:31:32 AM  
But this kind of shiat isn't just found among the Democrats. The inability to condemn and punish bad-boy behavior is found on boths sides. See Mark Sanford and Newt Gingrich.

Relatively speaking, the GOP is still a million times worse when it comes to women.
On one side you've got a party that refuses to strongly condemn their members who lie and cheat with women.
On the other you've got a party that refuses to strongly condemn their members who lie and cheat with women, and who also want to deny women rights and protections.

This is the worst, flailing attempt at tu quoque imaginable.
 
2013-08-01 10:34:25 AM  

Bloody William: Serious Black: Nothing Anthony Weiner has done is illegal. Unseemly, sure, but not illegal. And his wife is standing by him, so what's the problem here?

Bob Filner, OTOH, almost certainly could be charged with multiple counts of sexual assault, and the San Diego City Council recognizes this and has unanimously voted to prevent city funds from paying his legal fees.

None of this compares to the Republicans in state legislatures and executive offices enshrining into law legal treatment of women as subhuman morons who are completely incapable of making independent decisions regarding their bodily autonomy.

I really wonder if his wife is not only okay with it, but if they're perhaps swingers. Because, strangely enough, if word got out that they had an open marriage or were sexually experimental, it would be even MORE damaging to Weiner's political career than this horrible joke Carlos Danger has become.

Everyone's fine if things go according to plan, even if that plan is horrifying. A politician cheats on his wife? Happens all the time. A politician and his wife have an unconventional sex life that is mutual? Utterly and entirely scandalous.


I'd say it's a strong possibility, and I personally see nothing wrong with a couple consenting to let each other have sexual or emotional affairs with other men and women.
 
2013-08-01 10:36:58 AM  
Apples meet oranges...

Individuals committing unacceptable acts/behaviors with a woman/women is not the same as a party consistently introducing legislation to limit women's rights to make health care decisions or shooting down fair pay legislation are not equal.
 
2013-08-01 10:48:57 AM  

Bloody William: One party has some people who want to seduce you.

One party has lots of people who want to force you to get something inserted into yourself before you can get a legal medical procedure.

I'm sorry, how is this even close to both sides being bad?


I personally don't have an answer for you but I'm pretty any answer includes both Jesus and the Free Market.
 
2013-08-01 10:48:58 AM  

zedster: Personal actions vs. Policy changes
Dems will screw 7 women and GOP will screw millions


^this
 
2013-08-01 10:49:23 AM  
Dems/Libs seem to forget the shiat storm when Rush referred to a woman as a 'slut'.

/it's okay when our people do it.
 
2013-08-01 10:50:34 AM  
New York governor who admitted to using prostitutes and was caught trafficking one woman across state lines

Paying someone to meet you in a different place is a bit different from what that sentence is trying to make you think.
 
2013-08-01 10:51:05 AM  

ferretman: Dems/Libs seem to forget the shiat storm when Rush referred to a woman as a 'slut' for using birth control.

/it's okay when our people do it.

 
Displayed 50 of 103 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report