If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Opposing Views)   Judge rules that police in New York are under no duty to stop a madman from slicing you into fillets   (opposingviews.com) divider line 10
    More: Asinine, Judges' Rules, New York, Margaret Chan, dereliction of duty, supreme court justices, Gothamist  
•       •       •

7996 clicks; posted to Main » on 31 Jul 2013 at 10:24 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2013-07-31 10:38:21 PM
3 votes:

Lsherm:


Son, there's an a art to trolling. .


Fixed
2013-07-31 04:59:49 PM
3 votes:
The headline and the story cannot be accurate. I have been assured that civilians should not be permitted to carry firearms because they should be relying upon police for protection against attackers.
2013-07-31 10:28:41 PM
2 votes:

Darth_Lukecash: Peter von Nostrand:

So guns always protect people. Good point. Now that I've been reassured that guns always protect people, I say arm everyone, everywhere. In fact, I'd bet that there hasn't been one crime committed in Oklahoma since they passed open carry

At the very least, there should be a whole bunch of dead criminals lying around, no longer able to prey on the weak and hapless!


Running out of hap is the worst.
2013-07-31 10:42:33 PM
1 votes:

But you do have a duty to keep seven or fewer rounds in your magazine.


/assuming you can get a permit.

/All those gang members are packing, so it can't be too hard.

2013-07-31 10:40:27 PM
1 votes:
So, has New York passed a "you have to roll up into a ball and take it" law yet?
2013-07-31 10:37:16 PM
1 votes:
To Protect and Serve

That's one down. They've been kind of iffy on that last one for a long time too.
2013-07-31 10:26:30 PM
1 votes:

Peter von Nostrand: Lsherm: Peter von Nostrand: Dimensio: The headline and the story cannot be accurate. I have been assured that civilians should not be permitted to carry firearms because they should be relying upon police for protection against attackers.

No gun can ever protect the perpetually paranoid and scared amongst us

No, but it can shoot the motherfarker that is stabbing you when the cops won't respond.

So guns always protect people. Good point. Now that I've been reassured that guns always protect people, I say arm everyone, everywhere. In fact, I'd bet that there hasn't been one crime committed in Oklahoma since they passed open carry


Son, there's an art to trolling.  Doubling down on a logical fallacy isn't it.
2013-07-31 09:53:17 PM
1 votes:

Lsherm: Peter von Nostrand: Dimensio: The headline and the story cannot be accurate. I have been assured that civilians should not be permitted to carry firearms because they should be relying upon police for protection against attackers.

No gun can ever protect the perpetually paranoid and scared amongst us

No, but it can shoot the motherfarker that is stabbing you when the cops won't respond.


So guns always protect people. Good point. Now that I've been reassured that guns always protect people, I say arm everyone, everywhere. In fact, I'd bet that there hasn't been one crime committed in Oklahoma since they passed open carry
2013-07-31 09:44:27 PM
1 votes:

basemetal: What exactly is their duty then?

/to protect their own
//and serve themselves?


To protect and serve the society at large. Maybe they should write that last part a little bigger on the fenders.

You are but a single blade of grass on the lawn of society. You don't matter as an individual. Sure, the cops will pursue and arrest your murderer but only at a pace of their own convenience.


Look at what happened when they were chasing that Dorner guy around a few months ago. They shot the shiat out anything that almost looked like Dorner's vehicle because they were scared andif they had to blast a few innocent grandmothers delivering newspapers to protect themselves that was just the kind of sacrifice they were prepared to make in the line of duty. The police have militarized to the point of expected collateral damage as part of every day business. Do think for an instant that it was an LAPD thing.


Also when your house catches fire the fire dept only shows up to put it out so as to save the houses NEXT TO IT. Chances are that the bucket boys will wreck your house worse than the fire while putting it out.


/Sleep tight citizen
2013-07-31 08:54:44 PM
1 votes:

Peter von Nostrand: Dimensio: The headline and the story cannot be accurate. I have been assured that civilians should not be permitted to carry firearms because they should be relying upon police for protection against attackers.

No gun can ever protect the perpetually paranoid and scared amongst us


No, but it can shoot the motherfarker that is stabbing you when the cops won't respond.
 
Displayed 10 of 10 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report