Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(YouTube) Video Bill O'Reilly: So Obama thinks he's good at race-baiting, huh? *cracks knuckles* Watch this   (youtube.com) divider line 154
    More: Video, Bill O'Reilly  
•       •       •

4898 clicks; posted to Video » on 23 Jul 2013 at 9:39 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



154 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-07-23 10:52:34 AM  

Lsherm:  like how the complete lack of personal responsibility has so pervaded the liberal mindset that they think if they can't abort a baby that's "forcing" someone to have a baby.  It's as if the thought of birth control or even a little self-control is beyond the ability of a normal human being.  That's what liberals think about other people - that they are wild animals with no ability to control themselves.

Why do you have so little faith in your fellow humans, Skeuomorph?


Because in all humans, liberal or conservative, hindsight works better than foresight.  You can't stop people from making mistakes, human nature is to believe bad things happen to others, not oneself.  Once reality kicks in is when people most need a safety net.

If it can happen to the Palins, it can happen to you.  Kids pretty much are unable to control themselves because they simply don't grasp the consequences until it's too late.
 
2013-07-23 10:53:08 AM  

GF named my left testicle thundercles: dude are you a worker for some kind of false flag operation trying to shut down discussion on black issues with gibberish?


Ha ha.  You said dude.  Bye.
 
2013-07-23 10:53:14 AM  

Wall_of_Doodoo: But it's a rich WHITE guy talking about poor BLACK people statistics and therefore racist by its very nature.


not just a rich white guy, Carl Sagan was a rich white guy Mr Rogers was a rich white guy... this is a rich white partisan blowhard from right wing nutter news network.
 
2013-07-23 11:02:00 AM  
This isn't just about race.  It's about addressing the fact that the captains of industry have f*cked off with a lot of futures, pensions and jobs in the trunk of the getaway car.  Broken, dysfunctional cultures are broken dysfunctional cultures - regardless of the numbers on the tax return of any given participant - and that "oh, you're just racist" is not an answer, a solution or a remedy for any given culture's dysfunction.  Let's not even get into the fact that the label says "E Puribus Unum" and we're only supposed to be a culture of mutual goals.
 
2013-07-23 11:03:19 AM  
Btw, "Oh, you're just poor and jealous and lazy" isn't a panacea for THAT dysfunctional culture, either.
 
2013-07-23 11:03:50 AM  

bunner: Strike two.


Hah.

And my statement is spot on. There's only so many slices of pizza the fat guy can eat until you have to serve your family the carton for supper.

The premise of this claim relies on the idea that there is a fixed amount of wealth available, and (of course), the pig rich are taking too much of it. This is a leftist theory, and counter to reality.  Wealth is created and expanded over time. Even the evil pig rich must, and do, distribute their wealth to the other classes, continually. Wealth isn't eaten, nor is it static.

Ironically, the countries that do attempt to remedy your claimed injustice with command economies and heroic redistribution are without exception spectacular failures. And usually very bloody ones.
 
2013-07-23 11:11:44 AM  

bunner: Nabb1: It's not like you've actually rebutted anything he said with any actual facts or counter-arguments. I generally think O'Reilly is a gas bag, but if I'm going to dispute something he said, I bring something to the table other than misdirection and as hominem.

*clicks authority posture count*

Ahma clue you in on something.

I don't work for you.

*clicks ignore*




Awwwwww, how cute.
 
2013-07-23 11:13:53 AM  

bunner: Kuta: The rest of his rant was attributing cause to the statistics.

So, statistics are just manufactured at random in some office someplace and tacked up on phone poles for review?  There are no causative or correlative effects?  'Cause, like, I think that's the whole point of statistics.


O'Reilly doesn't get into any sort of depth to determine causative or correlative effects. Show me where he does. He single data point is not an honest effort at analysis.

In fact, he doesn't want to make that effort. He wants to sound like he's responding to Obama and does it by painting African American "culture" in the worst possible light. His "solutions" are traditional talking points and sound bites that pander to his audience.

That's the bullshiat of it all. He's telling his mostly white, male, suburban, married, conservative audience that what worked for them will work for everyone. And more to the point, that his path is the right path for good living.

Well guess what? Obama's existence tells us that every day that a person from unfortunate circumstances can overcome and become the most powerful person in the world.

Obama's story and experiences are inspirational. Bill O'Reilly's ranting is not.
 
2013-07-23 11:15:40 AM  

Shryke: bunner: Strike two.

Hah.

And my statement is spot on. There's only so many slices of pizza the fat guy can eat until you have to serve your family the carton for supper.

The premise of this claim relies on the idea that there is a fixed amount of wealth available, and (of course), the pig rich are taking too much of it. This is a leftist theory, and counter to reality.  Wealth is created and expanded over time. Even the evil pig rich must, and do, distribute their wealth to the other classes, continually. Wealth isn't eaten, nor is it static.

Ironically, the countries that do attempt to remedy your claimed injustice with command economies and heroic redistribution are without exception spectacular failures. And usually very bloody ones.


Yah, I read P. J. O'Rourke too.  There is a definitive amount of wealth.  It's called earth.  The bank notes are just IOUs for it.  Try collecting on them.  And printing them like confetti at a parade doesn't create more wealth.  It just igves more leverage to the people who already have hoovered up most of it

Shryke: Even the evil pig rich must, and do, distribute their wealth to the other classes


Barista tips and  lapdances do not a fluid economy make.

Shryke: Ironically, the countries that do attempt to remedy your claimed injustice with command economies and heroic redistribution are without exception spectacular failures.


Yeah, Swden is F*CKED, yo.  Just the other day I saw the ghost of Lenin grinning like a pig towards Gothenburg.
 
2013-07-23 11:18:30 AM  

Kuta: Obama's story and experiences are inspirational. Bill O'Reilly's ranting is not.


Thank you for pointing out the precise color of the blanket on your pony entered in this heat.  Clarification promotes discourse.  BTW, Bill O' Reilly is a bit of a douchebag and Obama really isn't Christ.  Neither of which obvious facts stack up to f*ck all here.
 
2013-07-23 11:20:46 AM  
You can either live in a community gated by thugs, alarm systems and dogs or in a community gated by violent crime, dope and racially motivated suspicions, but when those are the only two communities left, who - precisely - won?
 
2013-07-23 11:21:32 AM  
Shryke:
The premise of this claim relies on the idea that there is a fixed amount of wealth available, and (of course), the pig rich are taking too much of it. This is a leftist theory, and counter to reality.  Wealth is created and expanded over time. Even the evil pig rich must, and do, distribute their wealth to the other classes, continually. Wealth isn't eaten, nor is it static.

Ironically, the countries that do attempt to remedy your claimed injustice with command economies and heroic redistribution are without exception spectacular failures. And usually very bloody ones.


And just how is this wealth created and expanded over time? Working harder?

If you're not mining or farming, you're just moving money around. Try to move it faster than the other guy and don't go into debt.
 
2013-07-23 11:23:54 AM  

Kuta: If you're not mining or farming, you're just moving money around. Try to move it faster than the other guy and don't go into debt.


Bonus, the money is debt.  Wall St. is essentially a game of musical chairs in a bookie joint.  And every so often, they clean out the till.
 
2013-07-23 11:32:48 AM  

bunner: There is a definitive amount of wealth. It's called earth.


And we have barely scratched the surface. Literally.

The bank notes are just IOUs for it.  Try collecting on them.  And printing them like confetti at a parade doesn't create more wealth.  It just igves more leverage to the people who already have hoovered up most of it

Are you criticizing money itself now? Are you also denying the global supply of wealth has somehow stayed static relative to the population? You are aware that is completely counter to all known measures?

Yeah, Swden is F*CKED, yo

Sweden is capitalist and highly interested in staying that way. High tax rates do not equal command economies. Oh, and one of the large reasons why Sweden has recovered from the 90's was their lowering of corporate taxes.

Barista tips and  lapdances do not a fluid economy make.

Is that right? What about the places they work? Or their wages? I assume this is a hint at a future "living wage" statement - I will pass.
 
2013-07-23 11:33:59 AM  

Shryke: Even the evil pig rich must, and do, distribute their wealth to the other classes


Not to put too fine of a pernt on dis here, but.. ain't we sposed to be a casteless, classless, free and equal society?  Or did somebody buy that, too?
 
2013-07-23 11:35:59 AM  
Black, white, yellow, red or green.. don't ALLOW them to keep popping out the damned kids! 2 and no more welfare benefits. PERIOD! That's it.
Years ago, a buddy's wife tried to fix me up with a friend of hers at a party we had on the river. Chic was hot.. then found out she had 3 kids and no job.  Sure enough, she was in gov housing. Nipped that in the bud.
No job, but had a BIG flat screen tv, new fridge (ice maker/water disp.), and wound up buying a new computer off me...
A couple years later, she calls again and gets a laptop off me and has more kids. Just called a few months ago to purchase some RAM (then never showed up) and now has 6 kids, with one on the way.
This ignorant BS of popping out a damned kid every 2 or 3 years to keep a check coming in is the main problem.  Bet if there were no funds for them, they wouldn't be having them!
 
2013-07-23 11:36:32 AM  
I guess the truth hurts a little don't it. Someone had to say it.
 
2013-07-23 11:37:06 AM  

Kuta: If you're not mining or farming, you're just moving money around.


You seriously believe this? Medical and technical research is moving money around? The industrial revolution? "Wealth" isn't comprised solely of source materials, Kuta. Do you realize that, for a sum less than $100, you can own a device that can access 99% of the world's combined knowledge, instantly? That such access was impossible just 3 short decades ago?
 
2013-07-23 11:39:08 AM  

bunner: Shryke: Even the evil pig rich must, and do, distribute their wealth to the other classes

Not to put too fine of a pernt on dis here, but.. ain't we sposed to be a casteless, classless, free and equal society?  Or did somebody buy that, too?


In the frame of this debate, I must differentiate between populations. I am using your preferred terms as a convenience.
 
2013-07-23 11:41:01 AM  

Coolfusis: If you can't figure out why "liberals" think you're a racist for focusing only on the black community while quoting statistics that show that all races have the same issues in low-income areas, then you're probably just farking stupid. And racist.


Yeah, farking crazy to focus on the group that has disporportionate problems with those issues.
How racist.
 
2013-07-23 11:42:20 AM  

Shryke: Kuta: If you're not mining or farming, you're just moving money around.

You seriously believe this? Medical and technical research is moving money around? The industrial revolution? "Wealth" isn't comprised solely of source materials, Kuta. Do you realize that, for a sum less than $100, you can own a device that can access 99% of the world's combined knowledge, instantly? That such access was impossible just 3 short decades ago?


I think he was making a point about primary economic activity versus secondary industry, tertiary etc.
 
2013-07-23 11:42:43 AM  
@Kuta - Obama didn't grow up on the streets of Southern Detroit. He grew up in a privileged white house hold in Hawaii.
 
2013-07-23 11:43:12 AM  

Shryke: Are you criticizing money itself now?


It started out as a great idea.  But bank notes were NEVER anything more than IOUs.  IOUs for what has changed, not the function.  Let's try this.  "Sell me your car.  I'm sort of 16,000,000,000,000.00 short, atm, but I can give you a check."

Shryke: Sweden is capitalist and highly interested in staying that way. High tax rates do not equal command economies.


Sweden is socialist inasmuch as they have a government that utilizes a robust capitalist engine to serve the common needs of common people.  And rich motherf*ckers, too.  That's what socialism is.  Not Marx wiping his dick on your drapes while you work 100 hours a week.  that being said, capitalism, socialism, and to a much lesser extent, even communism are not be all end all one blanket that covers all asses.  They're components.  Use as necessary.  Like wrenches, hammer and screwdrivers.  and who the hell is in favor of "command economies"?

Shryke: I assume this is a hint at a future "living wage" statement - I will pass.


How wonderful for you that you needn't worry about what constitutes a living wage.  It's not impressive or useful but it's nice to know somebody is  keeping high end goods manufacturers lights on.
 
2013-07-23 11:43:59 AM  

Shryke: I am using your preferred terms


No you're not.
 
2013-07-23 11:47:20 AM  

TheMega: No job, but had a BIG flat screen tv, new fridge (ice maker/water disp.), and wound up buying a new computer off me...A couple years later, she calls again and gets a laptop off me and has more kids.


So you're saying she's a job creator?
 
2013-07-23 11:47:29 AM  

TheMega: Black, white, yellow, red or green.. don't ALLOW them to keep popping out the damned kids! 2 and no more welfare benefits. PERIOD! That's it.


Then what.

The type of person who is going to pop out 3 kids with no good job prospects is not the person to really look into exactly how much they can get from uncle sam.

Under your plan we are still going to have just as many moochers, but now they are goign to be poorer, and have less of the tools to learn to make the right decisions.

I am curious if you support sex ed, free condoms, free after school programs, and affrodable abortions?
 
2013-07-23 11:50:30 AM  

bunner: That's what socialism is.


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism

You are incorrect. Sweden is over 90% privately owned. This is the direct opposite of socialism.

It started out as a great idea.

I'd like to hear your solution.
 
2013-07-23 11:52:50 AM  

bdub77: Nabb1: bunner: Nabb1: It's not like you've actually rebutted anything he said with any actual facts or counter-arguments. I generally think O'Reilly is a gas bag, but if I'm going to dispute something he said, I bring something to the table other than misdirection and as hominem.

*clicks authority posture count*

Ahma clue you in on something.

I don't work for you.

*clicks ignore*

That's a mature response.

His ignore list must be staggering.


People really use the ignore button?
 
2013-07-23 11:57:11 AM  

TheMega: Bet if there were no funds for them, they wouldn't be having them!


[ohwaityoureserious.jpg]
 
2013-07-23 11:58:10 AM  
Look, Bill O'Reilly is an asshat.  Won't watch, don't care if I'm less of a human being because I didn't.  Just wondering how amazed he was that blacks weren't yelling for iced tea in ghetto voices when he went to Sylvia's in Harlem or whatever.

If you don't think there's an ongoing dialogue in the black community about blackness, about poverty, about how embarrassing some blacks are, you're an idiot.

If you don't think any prospective open dialogue about race in this country isn't immediately shut down by a bunch of asshat white dudes immediately stepping up and saying what's on their mind, you're an idiot.
 
2013-07-23 11:58:33 AM  

bunner: Shryke: I am using your preferred terms

No you're not.


Oh?

bunner: profit über alles morons


bunner: slices of pizza the fat guy can eat


You will need to give me an approved list then.
 
2013-07-23 11:58:38 AM  

Wall_of_Doodoo: Headso: Wall_of_Doodoo: But it's a rich WHITE guy talking about poor BLACK people statistics and therefore racist by its very nature.

not just a rich white guy, Carl Sagan was a rich white guy Mr Rogers was a rich white guy... this is a rich white partisan blowhard from right wing nutter news network.

Yeah, so? That's kind of his point (or Adam Carrolla's point who has said literally the same thing for more than a decade). Nobody's addressing whatever the real problems are regardless of race.


If you look at college enrollment rates and crime in general and teen birth rates they have been continually heading in positive directions for all races, all the bloviating by right wing hacks including Adam Carrolla doesn't address that ever. People within their own communities are addressing and dealing with these issues, human trash like O'reilly don't help with any of that, you'd have to be insane to think having a holier than thou blowhard telling people "how it is" would help in anyway.
 
2013-07-23 11:59:03 AM  

Shryke: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism


Ostensibly etched in stone semantics, let alone pedantry, does not an argument make.  But you know that.

Shryke: You are incorrect. Sweden is over 90% privately owned. This is the direct opposite of socialism.


Private ownership does not constitute a feudal capitalist state of unbridled avarice.  Socialism isn't about eschewing a capitalist engine or funneling all the money into the Kremlin.  It's about what you do with the money you DO funnel into public coffers.  The ghetto isn't where you live, it's how you live.  Ghettos with a few mansions sprinkled near the crackhouses are still ghettos and equally the fault of the prick who needs 16 bathroom to feel like a "success" and pays f*ck all in taxes and crack heads blowing their EBT benefits for crack.  There is no direct opposite of socialism or any other ism anymore that there are direct opposites between the accelerator and the brakes.  They're different components that do different things, both necessary.

Shryke: I'd like to hear your solution.


Simple.  Shake the etch a sketch.  Physics are a b*tch.  It's gonna get shaken anyhoo.  Wouldn't you prefer it be shaken by those of your purportendly "too well off to worry about all this 'living wage' fol de rol" class, as you put it?
 
2013-07-23 11:59:51 AM  

Shryke: You will need to give me an approved list then.


English without the piss pose works for me.  Got any?
 
2013-07-23 12:00:31 PM  

chewielouie: People really use the ignore button?


Oh my, yes.  It's ever so useful.
 
2013-07-23 12:02:58 PM  
"I am dismissive and find your assertions a joke at best and I shall reinforce this continuously until my posture of authority, against which you are obliged to mount a defense, is self evident."   Or you know, there's Netflix.
 
2013-07-23 12:08:17 PM  

Shryke: bunner: profit über alles morons


And yes, I do quite assert that if one spends one's entire time on this planet hoarding pieces on intaglio stamped linen as a be all end all of life itself - and do so on the backs of the people who bring it in the door for a pittance - so that they can arrive at the boneyard in a seriously snazzy coffin, that they are, indeed, a clinically identifiable moron.
 
2013-07-23 12:11:07 PM  

bunner: Ostensibly etched in stone semantics, let alone pedantry, does not an argument make. But you know that.


Yes yes, dictionaries and definitions are pedantic.

bunner: Private ownership does not constitute a feudal capitalist state of unbridled avarice.


Great? It also doesn't constitute pudding. Are you seriously offering that laughable strawman as a counterpoint?

bunner: It's about what you do with the money you DO funnel into public coffers.

...There is no direct opposite of socialism or any other ism anymore that there are direct opposites between the accelerator and the brakes.

Redefining English to suit your whims is hardly creative, much less a valid argument.  Capitalism and socialism are on opposite ends of a spectrum, by definition. Why this is unacceptable to you puzzles me.
 
2013-07-23 12:13:15 PM  

chewielouie: I don't like O'Reilly but he was just about 100% correct there.


Agreed
 
2013-07-23 12:15:07 PM  

bunner: This isn't just about race.  It's about addressing the fact that the captains of industry have f*cked off with a lot of futures, pensions and jobs in the trunk of the getaway car.  Broken, dysfunctional cultures are broken dysfunctional cultures - regardless of the numbers on the tax return of any given participant - and that "oh, you're just racist" is not an answer, a solution or a remedy for any given culture's dysfunction.  Let's not even get into the fact that the label says "E Puribus Unum" and we're only supposed to be a culture of mutual goals.


Statistically speaking, the black community does not have the education required to work for the captains of industry.

Not the captains of industries fault....find something else to blame.
 
2013-07-23 12:15:33 PM  

bunner: and do so on the backs of the people who bring it in the door for a pittance


I truly don't understand this mindset. The eternally "oppressed" poor, even "stolen" from. That said, I also know that no amount of evidence would challenge you to rethink this claim, even if I point to Sam Walton or other examples of economic freedom and success from the very lowest of economic beginnings.
 
2013-07-23 12:18:17 PM  

Shryke: Are you seriously offering that laughable strawman as a counterpoint?


Since you're into definitions, look up straw man.  And so far, "laughable' is the only dig you got that seems to hunt.  And not every well.

Shryke: Redefining English to suit your whims


Oh, Prunella.  Get you.   :  ) This is where you play the "well, apparently your're incapable of SERIOUSLY addressing my clearly unimpeachable logic so I can't be bothered" card.  You can't be bothered with a lot of things, Ahab.  Still not impressed.  Let alone with somebody who says that brakes and accelerators are very much total opposites, because it sort of says "the car is irrelevant". If I ever need to pronounce everything that doesdn't fit into whatever pamphlet I'm working off of as irrelevant, feel free to put some cyanide in my coffee.
 
2013-07-23 12:19:20 PM  
The left does not want the black community to succeed.

It would be like cutting the umbilical cord of an overbearing mother and her 30 year old offspring......
 
2013-07-23 12:22:31 PM  

Scorpitron is reduced to a thin red paste: Look, Bill O'Reilly is an asshat.  Won't watch, don't care if I'm less of a human being because I didn't.  Just wondering how amazed he was that blacks weren't yelling for iced tea in ghetto voices when he went to Sylvia's in Harlem or whatever.

If you don't think there's an ongoing dialogue in the black community about blackness, about poverty, about how embarrassing some blacks are, you're an idiot.

If you don't think any prospective open dialogue about race in this country isn't immediately shut down by a bunch of asshat white dudes immediately stepping up and saying what's on their mind, you're an idiot.


Contained in your response is part of the problem. Any "white dude" that steps up and talks about legitimate concerns - crime rates are outrageously high in the black community, and this concerns me because they are my neighbors and this affects my life - is immediately shouted down as an "asshat" and a racist for even bringing the subject up.

From the outside looking in, there is little to no outrage in the media over black on black crime. There is no outrage from the loudest black "community leaders" like Sharpton and Jackson, who instead prefer to flout the statistical anomaly as the next great civil rights crusade.

Black crime rates and black on black violence is something that does concern white Americans, who have a stake in their local community as well. You think white people want that crime ridden ghetto across the tracks? Think again.

Excluding white people from the dialog and attacking anyone who brings up the subject as a "white asshat" is one of the problems preventing people from finding a common solution.

So congrats on being part of the problem.
 
2013-07-23 12:26:04 PM  

Shryke: I truly don't understand this mindset. The eternally "oppressed" poor, even "stolen" from.


Tiberius Gracchus had that mindset 2000 years ago, this isn't some new thing. Rich people are constantly trying to take it all and poor people and those who get power through that population are always trying to push back on that.
 
2013-07-23 12:29:04 PM  

Shryke: bunner: and do so on the backs of the people who bring it in the door for a pittance

I truly don't understand this mindset. The eternally "oppressed" poor, even "stolen" from. That said, I also know that no amount of evidence would challenge you to rethink this claim, even if I point to Sam Walton or other examples of economic freedom and success from the very lowest of economic beginnings.


Look, don't take this personally, but you long ago lost interest in the gist of topic of this thread, as broad and mind as it is, and put on your "watch me straighten this poor schmuck out" hat on.  And it's past it's sell by.  Are you done, or should I just  nod and sigh and nudge you to your next "poor, uneducated, sap"?

And,  to respond to that post, THEY ROLLED UP THE SIDEWALKS, DADDY O, AND SAM WALTON IS DEAD AND MAKING A FORTUNE OFF CHEAP CHINESE CRAP ISN'T EXACTLY BOOTSTRAPPY.  You buy dogsh*t, sell it at a markup by the airplane hangar full and leverage loans to build the utterly disposable airplane hangars cause "real property!" and you pay the mooks who begrudgingly ring it up in food stamps and gas money.  Ain't exactly Horatio Alger, is it?  Make the last smirk count.
 
2013-07-23 12:29:20 PM  

Nabb1: bunner: Nabb1: It's not like you've actually rebutted anything he said with any actual facts or counter-arguments. I generally think O'Reilly is a gas bag, but if I'm going to dispute something he said, I bring something to the table other than misdirection and as hominem.

*clicks authority posture count*

Ahma clue you in on something.

I don't work for you.

*clicks ignore*

That's a mature response.


Looks to me like you went Ass first.
 
2013-07-23 12:45:11 PM  

Elegy: From the outside looking in, there is little to no outrage in the media over black on black crime. There is no outrage from the loudest black "community leaders" like Sharpton and Jackson, who instead prefer to flout the statistical anomaly as the next great civil rights crusade.


That's because nothing much changed for yeas for black people in this country until they started burning sh*t down.  And if it means we chase all the money out of the neighborhoods, if it mans we tolerate and tacitly encourage a culture of violence, if it means we let our own people poison us with dope, greed and misogyny, as long as white folks are scared of us, we're OK.  Even if stuff has changed.  And it's not helping and it's not making anybody rich and it's not keeping teenagers out of coffins or jail or maternity wards and it's, so far, it's a crutch that even comedians can't pick up with a straight face anymore.  This is, like it or not, a clown suit no matter whose closet it is hanging in.  And that has to change for there to be any hope.
 
2013-07-23 12:52:34 PM  

bunner: Since you're into definitions, look up straw man.


I claimed Sweden is over 90% privately held, and thus capitalist. You then somehow insisted this is not equivalent to "a feudal capitalist state of unbridled avarice".  What else would I call it? A heap of artistic license on your part?

bunner: Still not impressed.


Would you be impressed if I also changed the definitions of common terms to suit my whim? Or beat a few straw men up to further my arguments? Sadly, I must refuse.  Let me add that your beating of that tired-ass, OWS class warfare drum is boring.

bunner: Look, don't take this personally, but you long ago lost interest in the gist of topic of this thread


If you are free to offer opinions as the causes of black troubles, I am free to rebut them. Right?
 
2013-07-23 12:56:26 PM  

bunner: Shryke: Even the evil pig rich must, and do, distribute their wealth to the other classes

Not to put too fine of a pernt on dis here, but.. ain't we sposed to be a casteless, classless, free and equal society?  Or did somebody buy that, too?


Oh Boy, someone is sitting in one of those nondescript warehouse style buildings feeding bile to message boards for a profit. My guess? The benefactor is the Hillary '16 campaign lol!
 
Displayed 50 of 154 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report