If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(TaxProf)   Pac-12 fights to keep for-profit schools out of Division I so cash goes "to our student-athletes first and foremost." The twelve Pac-12 directors who make up to $2 million/year for one hour work/week could not be reached for comment   (taxprof.typepad.com) divider line 101
    More: Interesting, NCAA Division I, for-profit schools, athlete of the year, NCAA  
•       •       •

3768 clicks; posted to Sports » on 22 Jul 2013 at 3:14 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



101 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2013-07-22 01:15:49 PM
Blow the NCAA up and start over already.
 
2013-07-22 01:41:29 PM
I wonder why this wa$n't an i$$ue when the Univer$ity of Phoenix won the naming right$ to the $tadium where the Fie$ta Bowl i$ played.
 
2013-07-22 01:42:36 PM
If the PAC-12 schools don't want them, they don't have to vote them into their conference, and there's nothing forcing them to schedule games against them.
 
2013-07-22 02:11:09 PM
i love how there's a lawsuit pending at this moment where several past and current NCAA athletes are suing the NCAA for using their likeness in video games (former UCLA star and NBA washout Ed O'Bannon is the plaintiff of record, i believe, and just last week a couple of current UofA Wildcats joined the suit, although there are others).

so i guess for-profit schools are an affront to NCAA bylaws, but the NCAA can pocket cash from using athlete's likenesses in vidya games.  perfectly reconcilable positions.
 
2013-07-22 02:39:44 PM
Why aren't college sports programs like basketball and football just declared Pro Minor Leagues, receive funding from the NBA and NFL, and all the students are exempt from normal curriculum, and instead receive life coaching, financial management coaching, and other relevant training?

The pretense that college athletics are some sort of amateur competition just to earn glory for their school is so completely false it's ridiculous.
 
2013-07-22 02:48:41 PM

markie_farkie: Why aren't college sports programs like basketball and football just declared Pro Minor Leagues, receive funding from the NBA and NFL, and all the students are exempt from normal curriculum, and instead receive life coaching, financial management coaching, and other relevant training?

The pretense that college athletics are some sort of amateur competition just to earn glory for their school is so completely false it's ridiculous.


For most college athletes the reason they play is for love of the game, or because playing for the school was their ticket to a free education.  The vast majority of college athletes, including football and basketball players, will never play professionally.  Even at the biggest sports schools the majority of the athletes know they aren't headed for the pros, and the percentage that have a chance to play professionally just goes down as you go through the mid-major conferences to the minor conferences and then into D2, D3, and the NAIA.

The opportunity to earn an degree and graduate debt free is a huge incentive, and the majority of student athletes take advantage of that and go on to careers outside of professional sports.  Turning the NCAA into some minor-league for the NFL and NCAA would be a disservice to the vast majority of student athletes.
 
2013-07-22 03:09:19 PM

TuteTibiImperes: markie_farkie: Why aren't college sports programs like basketball and football just declared Pro Minor Leagues, receive funding from the NBA and NFL, and all the students are exempt from normal curriculum, and instead receive life coaching, financial management coaching, and other relevant training?

The pretense that college athletics are some sort of amateur competition just to earn glory for their school is so completely false it's ridiculous.

For most college athletes the reason they play is for love of the game, or because playing for the school was their ticket to a free education.  The vast majority of college athletes, including football and basketball players, will never play professionally.  Even at the biggest sports schools the majority of the athletes know they aren't headed for the pros, and the percentage that have a chance to play professionally just goes down as you go through the mid-major conferences to the minor conferences and then into D2, D3, and the NAIA.

The opportunity to earn an degree and graduate debt free is a huge incentive, and the majority of student athletes take advantage of that and go on to careers outside of professional sports.  Turning the NCAA into some minor-league for the NFL and NCAA would be a disservice to the vast majority of student athletes.


NCAA hoops/football are already minor leagues for NBA/NFL.  If fans really gave a shiat about all this, they'd demand that the NFL and NBA invest in their own sports and produce their own robust, stratified, minor league systems like the NHL and MLB have had for so long.  NFL/NBA have been suckling off the teats of the universities, refusing to provide their own supply for the ridiculous demand for post-h.s., pre-professional basketball and football.  Big business loves its socialism.
 
2013-07-22 03:20:10 PM
What university today isn't "for-profit"?
 
2013-07-22 03:20:36 PM

TuteTibiImperes: The opportunity to earn an degree and graduate debt free is a huge incentive, and the majority of student athletes take advantage of that and go on to careers outside of professional sports.  Turning the NCAA into some minor-league for the NFL and NCAA would be a disservice to the vast majority of student athletes.


You obviously aren't aware of the dirty secret of athletic scholarships:  most of them aren't full-ride any more.  More and more schools are taking their scholarship limit, especially in the "Olympic sports", and breaking them into half-scholarships for twice as many kids.  And before you say "well at least they're getting something", remember that they still have to follow NCAA rules which pretty much mean they can't even get so much as a free sandwich at a student event without the school being hit with "extra benefits" claims.  A lot of the half-scholarship athletes would be better off just going through regular financial aid.  Hell, at our school the "discount rate" is over 50% (i.e., the average student pays less than half of the tuition sticker price).
 
2013-07-22 03:21:56 PM
For-profit schools don't need to compete on the field. Univ of Phoenix already owns their own stadium!
 
2013-07-22 03:23:23 PM
can someone explain to me why the ability to play a sport well has frak-all with education?
 
2013-07-22 03:23:34 PM

clovis69: What university today isn't "for-profit"?


You don't know much about public universities, do you?
 
2013-07-22 03:24:27 PM
Now now, be fair. Sure, that's a lot of money, but don't they earn it?

After all, are not college athletics the best-managed, most corruption-free, squeaky-cleanest bastions of all that is good and competent in the world?

...hmm, actually, yeah, lemme just sharpen up that pitchfork for you.
 
2013-07-22 03:24:37 PM
nuff said

img.ksl.com
 
2013-07-22 03:25:07 PM
Because FOOTBALL,  FOOTBALL,  FOOTBALL!
Grunt! thump! Grargh!

Farking unamerican and highly homoerotic, the entire mess.
Not to mention rife with organized crime, including gambling, fixed games, and child rape.

Farking figure out how to grow enough food for your family and clean up the waters and then I'll consider memorizing your "stats" and putting you on my Fantasy team and jackin it to you.
 
2013-07-22 03:26:35 PM
Cosmetology schools and Devry have sports teams?
 
2013-07-22 03:26:51 PM

gameshowhost: TuteTibiImperes: markie_farkie: Why aren't college sports programs like basketball and football just declared Pro Minor Leagues, receive funding from the NBA and NFL, and all the students are exempt from normal curriculum, and instead receive life coaching, financial management coaching, and other relevant training?

The pretense that college athletics are some sort of amateur competition just to earn glory for their school is so completely false it's ridiculous.

For most college athletes the reason they play is for love of the game, or because playing for the school was their ticket to a free education.  The vast majority of college athletes, including football and basketball players, will never play professionally.  Even at the biggest sports schools the majority of the athletes know they aren't headed for the pros, and the percentage that have a chance to play professionally just goes down as you go through the mid-major conferences to the minor conferences and then into D2, D3, and the NAIA.

The opportunity to earn an degree and graduate debt free is a huge incentive, and the majority of student athletes take advantage of that and go on to careers outside of professional sports.  Turning the NCAA into some minor-league for the NFL and NCAA would be a disservice to the vast majority of student athletes.

NCAA hoops/football are already minor leagues for NBA/NFL.  If fans really gave a shiat about all this, they'd demand that the NFL and NBA invest in their own sports and produce their own robust, stratified, minor league systems like the NHL and MLB have had for so long.  NFL/NBA have been suckling off the teats of the universities, refusing to provide their own supply for the ridiculous demand for post-h.s., pre-professional basketball and football.  Big business loves its socialism.


The stiffest competition against the NFL starting its own minor league would come from the biggest and more influential football schools.  The NFL absorbing the top talent right out of high school would drop Alabama, Ohio State, Michigan, etc, much closer to the level of Troy State, Youngstown State, and Central Michigan.

Personally, I wouldn't be against that - the NFL could have their top end minor league, and it would level the playing field between the top BCS schools and the rest of Division 1 Football.  The FBS and FCS could merge together and there could be an actual playoff process across D1 football with all teams having a legitimate chance at the trophy.
 
2013-07-22 03:27:42 PM
And college sports matter becauuuuuuse...?
 
2013-07-22 03:27:43 PM

vudukungfu: Farking unamerican and highly homoerotic, the entire mess.


Interesting how you use homoerotic as an insult.  It's like an adorable hypocritical Ouroboros.
 
2013-07-22 03:28:34 PM

mentallo69: nuff said

[img.ksl.com image 850x478]


Heh, gotta love Geno Auriemma
 
2013-07-22 03:28:53 PM

mentallo69: nuff said

[img.ksl.com image 850x478]


So there is literally NO state in which the highest government employee is NOT employed by a college?  And damned few in which it is not a coach?  Do you have the raw data for that?  I'd like to pass it along to a few folks.
 
2013-07-22 03:29:30 PM

gameshowhost: TuteTibiImperes: markie_farkie: Why aren't college sports programs like basketball and football just declared Pro Minor Leagues, receive funding from the NBA and NFL, and all the students are exempt from normal curriculum, and instead receive life coaching, financial management coaching, and other relevant training?

The pretense that college athletics are some sort of amateur competition just to earn glory for their school is so completely false it's ridiculous.

For most college athletes the reason they play is for love of the game, or because playing for the school was their ticket to a free education.  The vast majority of college athletes, including football and basketball players, will never play professionally.  Even at the biggest sports schools the majority of the athletes know they aren't headed for the pros, and the percentage that have a chance to play professionally just goes down as you go through the mid-major conferences to the minor conferences and then into D2, D3, and the NAIA.

The opportunity to earn an degree and graduate debt free is a huge incentive, and the majority of student athletes take advantage of that and go on to careers outside of professional sports.  Turning the NCAA into some minor-league for the NFL and NCAA would be a disservice to the vast majority of student athletes.

NCAA hoops/football are already minor leagues for NBA/NFL.  If fans really gave a shiat about all this, they'd demand that the NFL and NBA invest in their own sports and produce their own robust, stratified, minor league systems like the NHL and MLB have had for so long.  NFL/NBA have been suckling off the teats of the universities, refusing to provide their own supply for the ridiculous demand for post-h.s., pre-professional basketball and football.  Big business loves its socialism.


So what you are saying is that mass murder is our only answer?
 
2013-07-22 03:29:55 PM

fireclown: can someone explain to me why the ability to play a sport well has frak-all with education?


Probably something similar to how playing a piano or acting in a play does.   How working for a school newspaper or participating in a non-academic student organization does.
 
2013-07-22 03:30:03 PM
The link website is much too high-brow for the Fark bunch.   They'll probably wonder where the beer cans and cigarette butts in their server cache originated.

Regarding profitability of schools - if one thinks public schools are not for profit, check out the bookstores selling ridiculously priced "textbooks" authored by teaching staff, external contracts supporting athletic programs, research dollars being pissed away by greedy profs who are not adequately held accountable.  Then when they blow all the state funds on boondoggles and inept professors, they raise tuition 7% in one year.

Pretty bad.
 
2013-07-22 03:30:47 PM
www.brobible.com
 
2013-07-22 03:31:02 PM
The only thing more farked up than a for-profit university is the idea that the NCAA gives a rat's ass about the education or welfare of "student"-athletes.
 
2013-07-22 03:31:24 PM

TuteTibiImperes: markie_farkie: Why aren't college sports programs like basketball and football just declared Pro Minor Leagues, receive funding from the NBA and NFL, and all the students are exempt from normal curriculum, and instead receive life coaching, financial management coaching, and other relevant training?

The pretense that college athletics are some sort of amateur competition just to earn glory for their school is so completely false it's ridiculous.

For most college athletes the reason they play is for love of the game, or because playing for the school was their ticket to a free education.  The vast majority of college athletes, including football and basketball players, will never play professionally.  Even at the biggest sports schools the majority of the athletes know they aren't headed for the pros, and the percentage that have a chance to play professionally just goes down as you go through the mid-major conferences to the minor conferences and then into D2, D3, and the NAIA.

The opportunity to earn an degree and graduate debt free is a huge incentive, and the majority of student athletes take advantage of that and go on to careers outside of professional sports.  Turning the NCAA into some minor-league for the NFL and NCAA would be a disservice to the vast majority of student athletes.


I kinda like the way hockey does it (despite all its faults). Create a junior-level competition for the best kids age 16-20, pay them a little money and treat them like minor leaguers. The ones not good enough or the ones with a borderline chance at pro-levels go NCAA. If a junior player isn't good enough to go pro, give him a scholarship to go to to school afterwards.
 
2013-07-22 03:32:49 PM

Bslim: And college sports matter becauuuuuuse...?


Because they are worth billions of dollars to televise, and they don't have to give one cent of that to the people playing the games
 
2013-07-22 03:34:55 PM

TuteTibiImperes: The opportunity to earn an degree and graduate debt free is a huge incentive, and the majority of student athletes take advantage of that and go on to careers outside of professional sports. Turning the NCAA into some minor-league for the NFL and NCAA would be a disservice to the vast majority of student athletes.


Rebuttal:

I was paid as a grad student to be a researcher, which was basically employment as a minor league engineer on behalf of some external industry company who out-sourced research to my prof.

How is that different than being an NCAA athlete, except I made less money for my school than the football team did, and the NCAA didn't care that I was paid?
 
2013-07-22 03:35:23 PM
markie_farkie: "Why aren't college sports programs like basketball and football just declared Pro Minor Leagues, receive funding from the NBA and NFL, and all the students are exempt from normal curriculum, and instead receive life coaching, financial management coaching, and other relevant training?"

Because the pleasant fiction sells a shiat-load more tickets than minor league sports.
Students, Alumni and their families will buy tickets and merch to an irrational degree due mere tribal association, making the current configuration the best one for profit maximization.

To say nothing of the follow-on effect for schools, in using the visibility of those programs to sell the 'college dream' to prospective students and their families, nor the alumni that defray costs via their donations and provide a network of influential people in a position to help on various particular issues due (again) no real reason but tribal association.

/ just *float the idea* of shuttering the football program see whether the alumnus in local government are as co-operative on your next visit to the zoning board.
 
2013-07-22 03:35:59 PM

mentallo69: nuff said

[img.ksl.com image 850x478]


lol at Nevada's 'Med School Plastic Surgeon'
 
2013-07-22 03:37:12 PM

ElwoodCuse: Bslim: And college sports matter becauuuuuuse...?

Because they are worth billions of dollars to televise, and they don't have to give one cent of that to the people playing the games


They also provide entertainment to the alumni and foster a connection with the school that leads to increased donations to areas outside of athletics, the enhance the campus atmosphere and help foster a sense of school spirit amongst students, and they trace their roots back to the earliest days of education in which students were expected to enhance themselves mentally, physically, and artistically.

I'm not saying that there aren't problems that need to be addressed, but overall they do a lot of good, and a lot of people enjoy them, hence the popularity.
Student athletes are paid via an opportunity to learn and a scholarship.  They get to take advantage of training facilities, have access to coaches to develop their skills, and given the motivation they can earn a degree to support themselves if the trip to the pros doesn't work out, or if they know, as most do, that it will never be in the cards anyway.
 
2013-07-22 03:37:19 PM
Go Gators
 
2013-07-22 03:37:27 PM

This text is now purple: How is that different than being an NCAA athlete, except I made less money for my school than the football team did, and the NCAA didn't care that I was paid?


Because no boosters from other schools cared enough about you to offer to buy you a car or give your parents handfuls of cash.
 
2013-07-22 03:37:42 PM

TuteTibiImperes: The opportunity to earn an degree and graduate debt free is a huge incentive, and the majority of student athletes take advantage of that and go on to careers outside of professional sports.


In and of itself I've got no problem with this. Hell, I enjoyed cheering on my D-III school's shiatty teams to victory a smaller margin of defeat, and I don't think I'd have felt radically different if I'd attended a school that gave out athletic scholarships.

But the only way to reach that goal you're talking about ethically is to ban recruiting and erect a firewall between admissions, financial aid, and the athletic department. That would mean no recruiting of athletes, no assistant coaches in the stands at high school games. Welcome to UNC, young Michael Jordan. Congratulations on meeting our admissions standards. Oh, you say you want to try out for the basketball team? The signup sheet is over there. Or, you could, you know, join the chess team or the Campus Republicans. Whatever floats your boat. The important thing is that you're here to get a good education.

Not for a hot minute do I believe such a system could ever work in practice. It'd be inconvenient at best for the students, it'd be an impossible temptation for the athletic departments, and it'd deprive universities of some window-dressing in terms of economic and minority outreach. But that is how it'd have to look, if it were honest and ethical and built around the 99.95% of student athletes who don't go pro, as opposed to the 0.05% who do.
 
2013-07-22 03:38:20 PM

This text is now purple: Rebuttal:

I was paid as a grad student to be a researcher, which was basically employment as a minor league engineer on behalf of some external industry company who out-sourced research to my prof.

How is that different than being an NCAA athlete, except I made less money for my school than the football team did, and the NCAA didn't care that I was paid?


It is different because educating researchers is the job of a University, and producing football players is not.
 
2013-07-22 03:41:20 PM

fireclown: It is different because educating researchers is the job of a University, and producing football players is not.


With some universities, I'm not so sure.
 
2013-07-22 03:41:25 PM

drunk_bouncnbaloruber: TuteTibiImperes: markie_farkie: Why aren't college sports programs like basketball and football just declared Pro Minor Leagues, receive funding from the NBA and NFL, and all the students are exempt from normal curriculum, and instead receive life coaching, financial management coaching, and other relevant training?

The pretense that college athletics are some sort of amateur competition just to earn glory for their school is so completely false it's ridiculous.

For most college athletes the reason they play is for love of the game, or because playing for the school was their ticket to a free education.  The vast majority of college athletes, including football and basketball players, will never play professionally.  Even at the biggest sports schools the majority of the athletes know they aren't headed for the pros, and the percentage that have a chance to play professionally just goes down as you go through the mid-major conferences to the minor conferences and then into D2, D3, and the NAIA.

The opportunity to earn an degree and graduate debt free is a huge incentive, and the majority of student athletes take advantage of that and go on to careers outside of professional sports.  Turning the NCAA into some minor-league for the NFL and NCAA would be a disservice to the vast majority of student athletes.

I kinda like the way hockey does it (despite all its faults). Create a junior-level competition for the best kids age 16-20, pay them a little money and treat them like minor leaguers. The ones not good enough or the ones with a borderline chance at pro-levels go NCAA. If a junior player isn't good enough to go pro, give him a scholarship to go to to school afterwards.


and Yale won the hockey championship.  Those kids actually have to go to school
 
2013-07-22 03:41:57 PM

mentallo69: nuff said

[img.ksl.com image 850x478]


I love that Nevada's top-paid employee is a med school  plastic surgeon. It makes perfect sense! Either that, or the chair of UNLV's statistics department.
 
2013-07-22 03:42:15 PM

kwame: Interesting how you use homoerotic as an insult.  It's like an adorable hypocritical Ouroboros.


Yeah, but you jibe bounces off me like as if flung upon a realdoll.
The problem with it being homoerotic is how many surfactant homophobes are fans.
That is the real crux of the biscuit.
 
2013-07-22 03:42:17 PM

markie_farkie: Why aren't college sports programs like basketball and football just declared Pro Minor Leagues, receive funding from the NBA and NFL, and all the students are exempt from normal curriculum, and instead receive life coaching, financial management coaching, and other relevant training?

The pretense that college athletics are some sort of amateur competition just to earn glory for their school is so completely false it's ridiculous.


That's only true of football, basketball and to a lesser extent baseball and hockey, and only at the Division I level. Ninety-nine percent of college athletes in MAJOR sports never go pro (except for baseball, where most of the "professionals" never make it out of the minor leagues), and most of the athletes in minor sports aren't even on scholarship.
 
2013-07-22 03:43:11 PM

fireclown: mentallo69: nuff said

[img.ksl.com image 850x478]

So there is literally NO state in which the highest government employee is NOT employed by a college?  And damned few in which it is not a coach?  Do you have the raw data for that?  I'd like to pass it along to a few folks.


here is where I read it
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/infographic-state-hi gh est-paid-employee-tells-us-again-174622028.html
 
2013-07-22 03:43:51 PM

semiotix: TuteTibiImperes: The opportunity to earn an degree and graduate debt free is a huge incentive, and the majority of student athletes take advantage of that and go on to careers outside of professional sports.

In and of itself I've got no problem with this. Hell, I enjoyed cheering on my D-III school's shiatty teams to victory a smaller margin of defeat, and I don't think I'd have felt radically different if I'd attended a school that gave out athletic scholarships.

But the only way to reach that goal you're talking about ethically is to ban recruiting and erect a firewall between admissions, financial aid, and the athletic department. That would mean no recruiting of athletes, no assistant coaches in the stands at high school games. Welcome to UNC, young Michael Jordan. Congratulations on meeting our admissions standards. Oh, you say you want to try out for the basketball team? The signup sheet is over there. Or, you could, you know, join the chess team or the Campus Republicans. Whatever floats your boat. The important thing is that you're here to get a good education.

Not for a hot minute do I believe such a system could ever work in practice. It'd be inconvenient at best for the students, it'd be an impossible temptation for the athletic departments, and it'd deprive universities of some window-dressing in terms of economic and minority outreach. But that is how it'd have to look, if it were honest and ethical and built around the 99.95% of student athletes who don't go pro, as opposed to the 0.05% who do.


I don't see the problem with recruiting and offering scholarships based on athletic talent.  The students still need to meet admissions criteria at most institutions (some are more willing to waive or bend the rules than others) and they still need to be enrolled in classes and maintain a certain GPA (and yes, some schools certainly cheat the system, the majority don't).  The NCAA has rules, such as the APR (which is unfortunately broken in a few ways and needs a revamp) to penalize schools whose athletes don't graduate or pass at a high enough rate.

Outside of the top BCS schools most institutions aren't making money directly off of football programs.
 
2013-07-22 03:45:27 PM

vudukungfu: The problem with it being homoerotic is how many surfactant homophobes are fans.
That is the real crux of the biscuit.


Lots of racists love biscuits.  Doesn't mean there's something wrong with biscuits.  You need to get out more.
 
2013-07-22 03:45:40 PM

Wellon Dowd: fireclown: It is different because educating researchers is the job of a University, and producing football players is not.

With some universities, I'm not so sure.


I agree.  I'm pointing my finger at U of Florida, Ohio State, and Penn.  I think that we can all agree that the role of colleges shouldn't be producing athletes, and that something has gone badly amiss.
 
2013-07-22 03:47:15 PM

vudukungfu: Yeah, but you jibe bounces off me like as if flung upon a realdoll.
The problem with it being homoerotic is how many surfactant homophobes are fans.
That is the real crux of the biscuit.


This has to be the first time in the history of the internet someone used the phrase "surfactant homophobes" in a thread relating to collegiate athletics.
 
2013-07-22 03:49:45 PM

fireclown: I think that we can all agree that the role of colleges shouldn't be producing athletes, and that something has gone badly amiss.


Why not?  Colleges produce virtually every other kind of contributor to the community.  At least college athletes get an education in addition to playing their sport.
 
2013-07-22 03:49:54 PM

Killer Cars: This has to be the first time in the history of the internet someone used the phrase "surfactant homophobes" in a thread relating to collegiate athletics.


It finally had to be said.
 
2013-07-22 03:51:00 PM

Killer Cars: vudukungfu: Yeah, but you jibe bounces off me like as if flung upon a realdoll.
The problem with it being homoerotic is how many surfactant homophobes are fans.
That is the real crux of the biscuit.

This has to be the first time in the history of the internet someone used the phrase "surfactant homophobes" in a thread relating to collegiate athletics.


Or maybe ever.

link to google web search.
 
2013-07-22 03:54:26 PM

kwame: This text is now purple: How is that different than being an NCAA athlete, except I made less money for my school than the football team did, and the NCAA didn't care that I was paid?

Because no boosters from other schools cared enough about you to offer to buy you a car or give your parents handfuls of cash.


The NSF gave me handfuls of cash. Paid my engineering department, too.
 
2013-07-22 03:54:46 PM

fireclown: Wellon Dowd: fireclown: It is different because educating researchers is the job of a University, and producing football players is not.

With some universities, I'm not so sure.

I agree.  I'm pointing my finger at U of Florida, Ohio State, and Penn.  I think that we can all agree that the role of colleges shouldn't be producing athletes, and that something has gone badly amiss.


UF - USN&WR Ranking - 54
Penn State (I assume you meant Penn State, and not Ivy League Penn there) - USN&WR Ranking - 46
Ohio State - USN&WR Ranking - 56

Now, for some non-'big sports'-schools

NYU - USN&WR Ranking - 32
RPI - USN&WR Ranking - 41
Boston University - USN&WR Ranking - 51

If you look at the USN&WR Top Ten ranked schools, 8 of them participate in NCAA Division 1 Athletics and field football teams (spoiler - it's mostly Ivy League schools, but Duke and Stanford make it onto the list as well).

Now, University rankings aren't everything, and might not even mean much, but the point is that having an athletics program, even a big athletics program, doesn't detract from other opportunities at a school.  A school can be a world class educational institution, do groundbreaking research, and still field a football team.
 
2013-07-22 03:54:53 PM
So I coin another one.
I did coin weaksauce and a few others.
 
2013-07-22 03:55:17 PM

TuteTibiImperes: For most college athletes the reason they play is for love of the game, or because playing for the school was their ticket to a free education.  The vast majority of college athletes, including football and basketball players, will never play professionally.  Even at the biggest sports schools the majority of the athletes know they aren't headed for the pros, and the percentage that have a chance to play professionally just goes down as you go through the mid-major conferences to the minor conferences and then into D2, D3, and the NAIA.

The opportunity to earn an degree and graduate debt free is a huge incentive, and the majority of student athletes take advantage of that and go on to careers outside of professional sports.  Turning the NCAA into some minor-league for the NFL and NCAA would be a disservice to the vast majority of student athletes.


I like this response.  If what the commercials tell me during March Madness, most kids will be professional in something other than sports.  There are a lot of kids who play sports that will, in all honesty and likelihood, will never go pro, but I'm sure that the stud DE at Alabama or the light-footed RB at Oklahoma or the WR with blazing speed at Oregon are only there for the quality education and nothing more.

This is just wishful thinking, but I would love it if the NFL let teams draft kids out of high school.  They wouldn't play in the NFL right away, because that's paid suicide and illegal in most states and countries, but ideally the teams could draft players they see potential in, guide them to the right college football programs for their skills to mature, and hopefully get them ready for whatever pro scheme that particular team is going to run.  They can pay the players a minor-league salary (it's a pittance compared to an actual contract, but it would still be money), and the colleges and universities could still have their games, a.k.a. cash cows.  Plus, at least for college football where this makes the most sense, it would get rid of that Ed O'Bannon lawsuit, and if done right, could let the teams help the players in terms of the changes they should expect when they join the big team.

Of course, this is all ideal, so I'm sure the people in charge would find a way to f-it all up, and the NFL probably doesn't like to do the research that colleges do for free right now anyways.  It is ridiculous, though, that more than half the states have a football coach making the most out of ANY public employee, including governors (if I'm reading that right, and if there are stats to back that up).  Wow
 
2013-07-22 03:55:34 PM

fireclown: This text is now purple: Rebuttal:

I was paid as a grad student to be a researcher, which was basically employment as a minor league engineer on behalf of some external industry company who out-sourced research to my prof.

How is that different than being an NCAA athlete, except I made less money for my school than the football team did, and the NCAA didn't care that I was paid?

It is different because educating researchers is the job of a University, and producing football players is not.


Physical education is part of a classical education. It was the Ivy schools that started the whole athletic scholarship idea.
 
2013-07-22 03:57:52 PM

This text is now purple: The NSF gave me handfuls of cash. Paid my engineering department, too.


That's cute, but you know it was nothing like what goes on when school boosters run unchecked.
 
2013-07-22 03:59:22 PM

This text is now purple: fireclown: This text is now purple: Rebuttal:

I was paid as a grad student to be a researcher, which was basically employment as a minor league engineer on behalf of some external industry company who out-sourced research to my prof.

How is that different than being an NCAA athlete, except I made less money for my school than the football team did, and the NCAA didn't care that I was paid?

It is different because educating researchers is the job of a University, and producing football players is not.

Physical education is part of a classical education. It was the Ivy schools that started the whole athletic scholarship idea.


The Ivy League schools don't explicitly give football scholarships (I'm not sure about other sports) but due to a large number of student athletes coming from households with relatively modest earnings compared to other attendees, many of them end up getting a full ride or close to it due to need based aid.
 
2013-07-22 03:59:38 PM
The entirety of college sports is a money-grabbing scheme.

There's nothin' wrong with dat.
 
2013-07-22 04:00:41 PM
This guy put it best (from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-13/abolish-college-football.htm l):

What the NCAA does is fundamentally abusive: it holds the wage for minor league football and basketball players down to zero, under the pretense that its workers are students. The person who put this best was Robert Barro (my father),

The NCAA is impressive partly because its limitations on scholarships and other payments to athletes boost the profitability of college sports programs. But even more impressive is the NCAA's ability to maintain the moral high ground. For example, many college basketball players come from poor families and are not sufficiently talented to make it to the NBA. Absent the NCAA, such a student would be able to amass significant cash during a college career. With the NCAA in charge, this student remains poor. Nevertheless, the athletic association has managed to convince most people that the evildoers are the schools that violate the rules by attempting to pay athletes rather than the cartel enforcers who keep the student-athletes from getting paid.

Football is even worse: it has the same labor dynamics as basketball, and is also http://www.philly.com/philly/health/HealthDay666224_20120629_Study_of_ Retired_NFL_Players_Finds_Evidence_of_Brain_Damage.html?cmpid=13889655 4">bad for players' health. Yet these enterprises are hugely profitable for universities, in part because labor costs are held so low. And that makes it difficult for university administrators to rein in their athletic programs, as we saw when Penn State's administrators let http://www.philly.com/philly/news/162305166.html?c=r">overrule them about notifying the state of Sandusky's behavior. Football was the lifeblood of Penn State, so it was more like Paterno was the university president's boss than vice-versa.

There is demand for minor league basketball and football, but there's no need for it to be tied to universities, or for the leagues to abuse their workers. By spinning off these profit centers, universities could return to their educational missions, and treat athletics the way the NCAA's Division III does: as an amateur activity to complement students' education.
 
2013-07-22 04:01:12 PM

kwame: This text is now purple: The NSF gave me handfuls of cash. Paid my engineering department, too.

That's cute, but you know it was nothing like what goes on when school boosters run unchecked.


I just can't get myself worked up about the evil of some alumni writing a blank check to a college.
 
2013-07-22 04:02:12 PM

TuteTibiImperes: The opportunity to earn an degree and graduate debt free is a huge incentive, and the majority of student athletes take advantage of that and go on to careers outside of professional sports. Turning the NCAA into some minor-league for the NFL and NCAA would be a disservice to the vast majority of student athletes.


The people who come into these threads to rave and foam at the mouth about the NCAA don't care about that.  For some reason, they have taken up the cause of football players because they don't get paid to play football.  That is their only concern.
 
2013-07-22 04:02:25 PM
Hmmmm, let's see, human accomplishments: Splitting the atom, reaching the moon, curing diseases....mmmmmm pretty good, throwing and catching balls..wait what?
 
2013-07-22 04:02:37 PM

TuteTibiImperes: The Ivy League schools don't explicitly give football scholarships (I'm not sure about other sports) but due to a large number of student athletes coming from households with relatively modest earnings compared to other attendees, many of them end up getting a full ride or close to it due to need based aid.


They don't now. They did until the 1920s, and only stopped because Harvard and Yale started to get pounded in football by state schools that were following their lead.

Basically, they didn't like having to play the poors on an equal footing, so they took their ball and went home.
 
2013-07-22 04:03:28 PM

TuteTibiImperes: semiotix: TuteTibiImperes: The opportunity to earn an degree and graduate debt free is a huge incentive, and the majority of student athletes take advantage of that and go on to careers outside of professional sports.

In and of itself I've got no problem with this. Hell, I enjoyed cheering on my D-III school's shiatty teams to victory a smaller margin of defeat, and I don't think I'd have felt radically different if I'd attended a school that gave out athletic scholarships.

But the only way to reach that goal you're talking about ethically is to ban recruiting and erect a firewall between admissions, financial aid, and the athletic department. That would mean no recruiting of athletes, no assistant coaches in the stands at high school games. Welcome to UNC, young Michael Jordan. Congratulations on meeting our admissions standards. Oh, you say you want to try out for the basketball team? The signup sheet is over there. Or, you could, you know, join the chess team or the Campus Republicans. Whatever floats your boat. The important thing is that you're here to get a good education.

Not for a hot minute do I believe such a system could ever work in practice. It'd be inconvenient at best for the students, it'd be an impossible temptation for the athletic departments, and it'd deprive universities of some window-dressing in terms of economic and minority outreach. But that is how it'd have to look, if it were honest and ethical and built around the 99.95% of student athletes who don't go pro, as opposed to the 0.05% who do.

I don't see the problem with recruiting and offering scholarships based on athletic talent.  The students still need to meet admissions criteria at most institutions (some are more willing to waive or bend the rules than others) and they still need to be enrolled in classes and maintain a certain GPA (and yes, some schools certainly cheat the system, the majority don't).  The NCAA has rules, such as the APR (which is unfortunately broken in a few w ...


Which is why when I create accounts for our online learning management system for a group of "special" classes held at UF, taught by our community college teachers, with students enrolled thru our community college it is a good portion of the football roster, the basket ball roster, and a handful of chinese students?  This is prep english and reading....
 
2013-07-22 04:04:19 PM

Bslim: Hmmmm, let's see, human accomplishments: Splitting the atom, reaching the moon, curing diseases....mmmmmm pretty good, throwing and catching balls..wait what?


upload.wikimedia.org
 
2013-07-22 04:06:24 PM

This text is now purple: I just can't get myself worked up about the evil of some alumni writing a blank check to a college.


I'm assuming you know about this and are just being obtuse for kicks.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_University_of_Miami_athletics_scan da l
 
2013-07-22 04:06:33 PM

semiotix: mentallo69: nuff said

[img.ksl.com image 850x478]

I love that Nevada's top-paid employee is a med school  plastic surgeon. It makes perfect sense! Either that, or the chair of UNLV's statistics department.


Why would they pay anyone extra at the statistics department when they have the International Gaming Institute? http://igi.unlv.edu/

\Plastic Surgery is as close to pure profit as you can find in medicine.
\\Everywhere I've ever been, boobies cost SOMEBODY a lot of money. Maybe not the person they were attached to but somebody.
 
2013-07-22 04:08:56 PM

kwame: This text is now purple: I just can't get myself worked up about the evil of some alumni writing a blank check to a college.

I'm assuming you know about this and are just being obtuse for kicks.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_University_of_Miami_athletics_scan da l


So, outside of the Pell Grant fraud (fraud's fraud), what part of that works you up?
 
2013-07-22 04:09:12 PM

i.r.id10t: Which is why when I create accounts for our online learning management system for a group of "special" classes held at UF, taught by our community college teachers, with students enrolled thru our community college it is a good portion of the football roster, the basket ball roster, and a handful of chinese students?  This is prep english and reading....


Many football and basketball players come from underprivileged households or areas with general economic poverty.  Those areas don't tend to have the greatest school systems, nor those students the support at home to succeed at the K-12 level.  For many of them an athletic scholarship is the only way they're going to have the opportunity to attend college.

Some will take advantage of that, some won't.  All of the big schools and most of the mid-majors have academic tutoring programs specifically designed to help reach those students so that they can succeed.
 
2013-07-22 04:11:08 PM

This text is now purple: So, outside of the Pell Grant fraud (fraud's fraud), what part of that works you up?


I'm not worked up.  You asked how that's different from a research student getting paid to work.  This scenario will never happen for a research student.
 
2013-07-22 04:12:02 PM

The Third Man: TuteTibiImperes: The opportunity to earn an degree and graduate debt free is a huge incentive, and the majority of student athletes take advantage of that and go on to careers outside of professional sports.  Turning the NCAA into some minor-league for the NFL and NCAA would be a disservice to the vast majority of student athletes.

You obviously aren't aware of the dirty secret of athletic scholarships:  most of them aren't full-ride any more.  More and more schools are taking their scholarship limit, especially in the "Olympic sports", and breaking them into half-scholarships for twice as many kids.  And before you say "well at least they're getting something", remember that they still have to follow NCAA rules which pretty much mean they can't even get so much as a free sandwich at a student event without the school being hit with "extra benefits" claims.  A lot of the half-scholarship athletes would be better off just going through regular financial aid.  Hell, at our school the "discount rate" is over 50% (i.e., the average student pays less than half of the tuition sticker price).


Exactly!
My daughter's scholarship for waterpolo was for books up to $500.00 per year. Coach used most of his scholarship money to get a  26 year old Chinese Olympian "freshman" and a Hungarian Olympian. Only those two got full scholarships. And then they want players to take lighter loads during season so you will end up on the 5 year plan anyway.
 
2013-07-22 04:12:10 PM

mentallo69: nuff said

[img.ksl.com image 850x478]


Nevada's is a joke, right?  Nah, probably makes sense now that I think about it.
 
2013-07-22 04:12:55 PM

kwame: This text is now purple: How is that different than being an NCAA athlete, except I made less money for my school than the football team did, and the NCAA didn't care that I was paid?

Because no boosters from other schools cared enough about you to offer to buy you a car or give your parents handfuls of cash.


What about a RealDoll?
 
2013-07-22 04:12:59 PM

scandalrag: semiotix: mentallo69: nuff said

[img.ksl.com image 850x478]

I love that Nevada's top-paid employee is a med school  plastic surgeon. It makes perfect sense! Either that, or the chair of UNLV's statistics department.

Why would they pay anyone extra at the statistics department when they have the International Gaming Institute? http://igi.unlv.edu/

\Plastic Surgery is as close to pure profit as you can find in medicine.
\\Everywhere I've ever been, boobies cost SOMEBODY a lot of money. Maybe not the person they were attached to but somebody.


You realize that plastic surgeons do more than boob jobs, right?  They repair cleft palates, perform skin grafts for burn patients, and help repair damage from traumatic and disfiguring injuries as well.
 
2013-07-22 04:15:28 PM
Professional sports are a profession, hence the word professional.  In any profession there is training involved.  Some universities and colleges offer said training in said areas.  I don't understand why we can't admit that to ourselves and offer degree programs for this.  Future architectural engineers don't have a "Business Administration" degree to prove they're working towards a career in engineering, so why do future NFL players?
 
2013-07-22 04:16:00 PM

TuteTibiImperes: Many football and basketball players come from underprivileged households or areas with general economic poverty. Those areas don't tend to have the greatest school systems, nor those students the support at home to succeed at the K-12 level. For many of them an athletic scholarship is the only way they're going to have the opportunity to attend college.


So link the scholarship money to a targeted region and academic criteria.  Or select the kind of underprivileged kids that you want and do some interviews.  If anyone is being malserved by this train wreck of a system that has evolved it is poor minority kids who are being taught that the way out is by way of the NCAA and not by actual learning.  We might as well buy them a parcel of lottery tickets.
 
2013-07-22 04:17:33 PM

forresttriax: My daughter's scholarship for waterpolo was for books up to $500.00 per year. Coach used most of his scholarship money to get a 26 year old Chinese Olympian "freshman" and a Hungarian Olympian. Only those two got full scholarships. And then they want players to take lighter loads during season so you will end up on the 5 year plan anyway.


If only there was some way to go to a different university.
 
2013-07-22 04:19:50 PM
forresttriax:
Exactly!
My daughter's scholarship for waterpolo was for books up to $500.00 per year. Coach used most of his scholarship money to get a  26 year old Chinese Olympian "freshman" and a Hungarian Olympian. Only those two got full scholarships. And then they want players to take lighter loads during season so you will end up on the 5 year plan anyway.


Athletes in non-revenue sports don't always have it easy, but it also depends on the school.  Some try to field as many sports as they can, some focus on the ones they can fully fund.  Oddly enough oftentimes female athletes end up with more scholarship opportunities in non-revenue sports because they school has to find a way to balance the huge number of football scholarships (FBS - 85, FCS - up to 63, D2 - up to 36) and still maintain Title IX compliance.

A lot of schools have cut men's teams entirely to help make the budget and ease the Title IX compliance issues - Wrestling is oftentimes a victim because it's a men's only sport that doesn't make revenue on its own.
 
2013-07-22 04:24:46 PM

theurge14: Professional sports are a profession, hence the word professional.  In any profession there is training involved.  Some universities and colleges offer said training in said areas.  I don't understand why we can't admit that to ourselves and offer degree programs for this.  Future architectural engineers don't have a "Business Administration" degree to prove they're working towards a career in engineering, so why do future NFL players?


I'll give you that architecture has had its highs and lows in the past few years, but I don't think we're seeing an average architectural career of a little less than seven years before they're out of their company (even factoring in the ones who get past the probationary period).  Nor, do I see every architect applying to the same architectural company which holds a monopoly on the industry in the nation.  Nor is every other architectural company outside of the country so incompatible with the one in the country that the architects have few options..
 
2013-07-22 04:27:17 PM
 
2013-07-22 04:28:26 PM

kwame: forresttriax: My daughter's scholarship for waterpolo was for books up to $500.00 per year. Coach used most of his scholarship money to get a 26 year old Chinese Olympian "freshman" and a Hungarian Olympian. Only those two got full scholarships. And then they want players to take lighter loads during season so you will end up on the 5 year plan anyway.

If only there was some way to go to a different university.


That's precisely what she has done. Transferred to a D2 school where there are no athletic scholarships but was offered a reasonable (1/2 tuition) academic scholarship.
 
2013-07-22 04:28:45 PM

pueblonative: I don't think we're seeing an average architectural career of a little less than seven years before they're out of their company


What about the average lifetime salary of an engineer compared to that of a seven year run in the NFL?

pueblonative: Nor, do I see every architect applying to the same architectural company which holds a monopoly on the industry in the nation.


Like the Canadian league and Arena league and every college and high school coaching position in the country?

pueblonative: Nor is every other architectural company outside of the country so incompatible with the one in the country that the architects have few options..


That's just silly.
 
2013-07-22 04:29:23 PM

forresttriax: That's precisely what she has done. Transferred to a D2 school where there are no athletic scholarships but was offered a reasonable (1/2 tuition) academic scholarship.


Good for her (and you) and best of luck to your daughter in school.
 
2013-07-22 04:43:28 PM

kwame: pueblonative: I don't think we're seeing an average architectural career of a little less than seven years before they're out of their company

What about the average lifetime salary of an engineer compared to that of a seven year run in the NFL?

You want to compare the average lifetime salary of an engineer vs an NFL football player?  Okay, but let's factor in the health care costs too

. seems that those average seven year careers aren't paying the docs like they used to.


pueblonative: Nor, do I see every architect applying to the same architectural company which holds a monopoly on the industry in the nation.

Like the Canadian league and Arena league and every college and high school coaching position in the country?


Apparently the word nation confused you, seeing as how the CFL hasn't had any American teams since the turn of the century.  As far as the AFL, you're seriously going to propose that a league that's folded and pays an average of $31K to $80K is an economic competitor with a league that pays an average of $770K?   I guess you are, since you're ready to compare it to coaching the local high school team.


pueblonative: Nor is every other architectural company outside of the country so incompatible with the one in the country that the architects have few options..

That's just silly.


Yeah, It's silly that we call a sport football that has jack and shiat to do with kicking the ball the majority of the time yet the sport that everybody else in the world plays that does involve feet touching balls (back off Rex Ryan) we call soccer.
 
2013-07-22 04:58:00 PM

kwame: This text is now purple: So, outside of the Pell Grant fraud (fraud's fraud), what part of that works you up?

I'm not worked up. You asked how that's different from a research student getting paid to work. This scenario will never happen for a research student.


That's The Best Kind of Correct (r), seeing as grad researchers aren't eligible for Pell Grants. But do you think federal grant fraud never happens with grad students?
 
2013-07-22 05:00:58 PM

pueblonative: Yeah, It's silly that we call a sport football that has jack and shiat to do with kicking the ball the majority of the time yet the sport that everybody else in the world plays that does involve feet touching balls (back off Rex Ryan) we call soccer.


Rugby, gridiron, australian-rules, 7-on-7, and soccer are all footballs. (soccer -- association football).

The name comes not because it was played with the feet, but because it was played on foot. This distinguishes it from ball sports like polo. It helps to remember how old football is.
 
2013-07-22 05:04:30 PM

rjakobi: gameshowhost: TuteTibiImperes: markie_farkie: Why aren't college sports programs like basketball and football just declared Pro Minor Leagues, receive funding from the NBA and NFL, and all the students are exempt from normal curriculum, and instead receive life coaching, financial management coaching, and other relevant training?

The pretense that college athletics are some sort of amateur competition just to earn glory for their school is so completely false it's ridiculous.

For most college athletes the reason they play is for love of the game, or because playing for the school was their ticket to a free education.  The vast majority of college athletes, including football and basketball players, will never play professionally.  Even at the biggest sports schools the majority of the athletes know they aren't headed for the pros, and the percentage that have a chance to play professionally just goes down as you go through the mid-major conferences to the minor conferences and then into D2, D3, and the NAIA.

The opportunity to earn an degree and graduate debt free is a huge incentive, and the majority of student athletes take advantage of that and go on to careers outside of professional sports.  Turning the NCAA into some minor-league for the NFL and NCAA would be a disservice to the vast majority of student athletes.

NCAA hoops/football are already minor leagues for NBA/NFL.  If fans really gave a shiat about all this, they'd demand that the NFL and NBA invest in their own sports and produce their own robust, stratified, minor league systems like the NHL and MLB have had for so long.  NFL/NBA have been suckling off the teats of the universities, refusing to provide their own supply for the ridiculous demand for post-h.s., pre-professional basketball and football.  Big business loves its socialism.

So what you are saying is that mass murder is our only answer?


Well. Just ethnic cleansing.
 
2013-07-22 05:05:51 PM
Then we'd all watch "football", which in those days was called "baseball".
 
2013-07-22 05:19:05 PM

This text is now purple: pueblonative: Yeah, It's silly that we call a sport football that has jack and shiat to do with kicking the ball the majority of the time yet the sport that everybody else in the world plays that does involve feet touching balls (back off Rex Ryan) we call soccer.

Rugby, gridiron, australian-rules, 7-on-7, and soccer are all footballs. (soccer -- association football).

The name comes not because it was played with the feet, but because it was played on foot. This distinguishes it from ball sports like polo. It helps to remember how old football is.


Interesting bit of information there, I'll have to bookmark it.  Point being, however, is that the skills gained in one form of football (gridiron football) are not easily  transferred to the others. I'm not saying that football players are klutzes, but they would go up against people who have been practicing soccer (or basketball, or whatever) for most of their lives.  The other options mentioned up above constitute a serious decrease in income, a move to a different country, or both.  And that's what happens when you do manage to land a job in your chosen profession that can pay the bills.  Like the NCAA ad goes, most college athletes become a professional in something OTHER than their chosen sport.  Putting together a "Professional Sports" degree program would basically be devoting university funds to something that may see one or two success stories per year and leave the rest with a degree that ends up being worthless to the rest.
 
2013-07-22 05:23:48 PM

This text is now purple: That's The Best Kind of Correct (r), seeing as grad researchers aren't eligible for Pell Grants. But do you think federal grant fraud never happens with grad students?


Oh, I'm sure it happens.

You know, I overlooked something I really should have caught right from the start.  You said grad student research, and that pretty much ends every discussion about how it's different.  That was my bad.
 
2013-07-22 05:46:38 PM

TuteTibiImperes: You realize that plastic surgeons do more than boob jobs, right?  They repair cleft palates, perform skin grafts for burn patients, and help repair damage from traumatic and disfiguring injuries as well.


And yet, since it's Nevada, you got the joke.
 
2013-07-22 05:50:07 PM

fireclown: This text is now purple: Rebuttal:

I was paid as a grad student to be a researcher, which was basically employment as a minor league engineer on behalf of some external industry company who out-sourced research to my prof.

How is that different than being an NCAA athlete, except I made less money for my school than the football team did, and the NCAA didn't care that I was paid?

It is different because educating researchers is the job of a University, and producing football players is not.


Why not?  Universities produce all form of entertainers, from musicians, to actors, to authors and artists and dancers.  Why is producing a football player any less worthy?
 
2013-07-22 05:51:52 PM

johnsoninca: I wonder why this wa$n't an i$$ue when the Univer$ity of Phoenix won the naming right$ to the $tadium where the Fie$ta Bowl i$ played.


The Fiesta Bowl made a long-term commitment to the Arizona Tourism and Sports Authority to host their annual game in that Stadium. This long-term contract was one of the reasons the voters of Arizona agreed to finance the Stadium in the first place.

The Apollo Group (the owners of the University of Phoenix) owning the naming rights to the Stadium is their way to tell the NCAA "f*** you".. and this leaves the NCAA with three options: STFU (not!), take their ball and their Bowl elsewhere (ha!)...  or try to get as much money as possible from the AzTSA and the Arizona Cardinals (which is what they're doing).
 
2013-07-22 06:28:28 PM

johnsoninca: I wonder why this wa$n't an i$$ue when the Univer$ity of Phoenix won the naming right$ to the $tadium where the Fie$ta Bowl i$ played.


Because the alternative was "Pink Taco". I shiat you not.
 
2013-07-22 06:43:59 PM

UNC_Samurai: johnsoninca: I wonder why this wa$n't an i$$ue when the Univer$ity of Phoenix won the naming right$ to the $tadium where the Fie$ta Bowl i$ played.

Because the alternative was "Pink Taco". I shiat you not.


Also, because the Pac 12 and the NCAA don't have control over the Fiesta Bowl or that stadium.  The stadium is owned by the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority, and the Fiesta Bowl is its own entity, not related to or controlled by the NCAA.
 
2013-07-22 07:00:29 PM

markie_farkie: Why aren't college sports programs like basketball and football just declared Pro Minor Leagues, receive funding from the NBA and NFL, and all the students are exempt from normal curriculum, and instead receive life coaching, financial management coaching, and other relevant training?

The pretense that college athletics are some sort of amateur competition just to earn glory for their school is so completely false it's ridiculous.


For the same reason health insurance is run through your employer. It was an idea that made sense 50+ years and today the established and entrenched parties in power / position to profit will do anything they can to keep the "status quo" even though it's antiquated and makes no farking sense.

See also: Our tax code
 
2013-07-22 08:45:32 PM

kwame: This text is now purple: How is that different than being an NCAA athlete, except I made less money for my school than the football team did, and the NCAA didn't care that I was paid?

Because no boosters from other schools cared enough about you to offer to buy you a car or give your parents handfuls of cash.


Imagine a world where boosters throw money at the university to have the most awesome research program EVAR.
 
2013-07-22 09:03:00 PM
Of you want college age athletes to be paid, start a farking amateur league and quit whining about why the NCAA doesn't do something they will never ever do.
 
2013-07-22 09:24:53 PM

revrendjim: kwame: This text is now purple: How is that different than being an NCAA athlete, except I made less money for my school than the football team did, and the NCAA didn't care that I was paid?

Because no boosters from other schools cared enough about you to offer to buy you a car or give your parents handfuls of cash.

Imagine a world where boosters throw money at the university to have the most awesome research program EVAR.


Various academic programs routinely get private donations.  Athletic programs are one of the major ways that schools network with and maintain relationships with those donors.

I was in the band at my school, and part of the game day routine was marching over to the president's mansion and playing the fight song and a couple other various tunes for the crown of various donors and other bigwigs he assembled there for brunch before every game.  It was always a who's-who of rich alumni, philanthropists, CEOs, and assorted politically connected individuals.  We'd play our tunes, then jump in the buses to get taken down to the stadium to entertain the tailgating fans, they'd drink their mimosas while he'd schmooze them for cash and then always have a collection of them in his luxury box on the 50 yard line.
 
2013-07-22 09:50:39 PM
There are no Division I football schools that are non for profit.
 
2013-07-22 10:12:16 PM
What if there were pro leagues for athletes betweeen 18 and 22 that do not want to go to college. every player gets 100,000 per year. you cvannot play untill you are 18 after june first, and have to stop playing in the league when you turn 22 bu june 1st.
 
2013-07-23 03:26:37 AM

gameshowhost: If fans really gave a shiat about all this, they'd demand that the NFL and NBA invest in their own sports and produce their own robust, stratified, minor league systems


The NBA is trying (D-league, not to mention all the foreign pro leagues) and it's not like college hoops is all that relevant to the NBA these days.
 
Displayed 101 of 101 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report