If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Think Progress)   Candidate in VA governor's race campaigns on attempting to restore unconstitutional ban on oral sex and sodomy. Tag: By tying it to child molestation   (thinkprogress.org) divider line 143
    More: Asinine, Virginia, child molestation, political campaigns, oral sex, Attorney General of Virginia, Virginia General Assembly, Cuccinelli, public sex  
•       •       •

2018 clicks; posted to Politics » on 17 Jul 2013 at 4:43 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



143 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2013-07-17 02:22:14 PM
I think we really are at the point where "social conservative" has become a noun to describe someone who is constantly thinking about f*cking children.
 
2013-07-17 02:28:12 PM
oral sex and sodomy

Are the banning Snickers and candy bars, too?
 
2013-07-17 02:34:05 PM

Aarontology: I think we really are at the point where "social conservative" has become a noun to describe someone who is constantly thinking about f*cking children.


And animals.
 
2013-07-17 02:45:11 PM
And it would just be struck down again.
 
2013-07-17 02:50:44 PM
"My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They're intrinsically wrong. And I think in a natural law based country it's appropriate to have policies that reflect that. ... They don't comport with natural law."

Most animals engage in homosexuality.  Are animals not natural?  In fact, homo sapiens is the only species that both engages in homosexual acts and then actually gives a shiat about it.  THAT is what is unnatural.
 
2013-07-17 02:52:50 PM
The way the law is written, it would make it a felony for normal, heterosexual, consenting adults to have oral sex too.  Ken Cuccinelli doesn't like blow jobs.
 
2013-07-17 03:00:06 PM

Aarontology: I think we really are at the point where "social conservative" has become a noun to describe someone who is constantly thinking about f*cking children.


No, see, this guy is constantly thinking about f*cking other men.  He just wants you to think that he's thinking about f*cking children.
 
2013-07-17 03:01:38 PM
If you tell someone with their head up their ass to go fark themselves, can they perform oral on themselves at the same time?
 
2013-07-17 03:05:31 PM
An FBI agent once said that EVERY child predator owns substantial Star Trek memorabilia. It would make it easier to convict them by making that stuff illegal.

/It's because men who prey on children have things children like, not because there's some actual connection
 
2013-07-17 03:05:40 PM

Kredal: The way the law is written, it would make it a felony for normal, heterosexual, consenting adults to have oral sex too.  Ken Cuccinelli doesn't like blow jobs.


That is the stated point.

Kenny refuses to answer the question, though, if any of the sex he's ever had runs afoul of this proposed law.

AdolfOliverPanties: "My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They're intrinsically wrong. And I think in a natural law based country it's appropriate to have policies that reflect that. ... They don't comport with natural law."

Most animals engage in homosexuality.  Are animals not natural?  In fact, homo sapiens is the only species that both engages in homosexual acts and then actually gives a shiat about it.  THAT is what is unnatural.


Also, several animal species engage in sex for fun/pleasure - oral, anal (I think) and mutual handjobbery (or flipperjobbery, or paw...you get the point).
 
2013-07-17 03:06:07 PM

Kredal: The way the law is written, it would make it a felony for normal, heterosexual, consenting adults to have oral sex too.  Ken Cuccinelli doesn't like blow jobs.


If his wife doesn't perform and he can't have them, no one can.
 
2013-07-17 03:12:41 PM
Good luck with that! The prisons are going to be bursting at the seams.
 
2013-07-17 04:38:26 PM
Ah...suck it, Cooch-i-nelli!
 
2013-07-17 04:41:21 PM

James!: And it would just be struck down again.


much like my boner
 
2013-07-17 04:48:30 PM

Jackson Herring: James!: And it would just be struck down again.

much like my boner


Your boner will become more powerful than we can possibly imagine?
 
2013-07-17 04:50:17 PM

Arachnophobe: Jackson Herring: James!: And it would just be struck down again.

much like my boner

Your boner will become more powerful than we can possibly imagine?


It'll be just an empty robe and eventually reappear with a bunch of other dead penises as a hologram.
 
2013-07-17 04:51:32 PM
Laser like focus on small government.
 
2013-07-17 04:52:16 PM
"If I ain't havin' fun, NOBODY can!!"
 
2013-07-17 04:52:34 PM

Aarontology: I think we really are at the point where "social conservative" has become a noun to describe someone who is constantly thinking about f*cking children.


Shiat, if that's all it takes to be a social conservative, then I suppose I'm a social conservative.
 
2013-07-17 04:53:11 PM

alienated: Laser like focus on small government.


Small enough to fit inside a mouth or a rectum for sure.
 
2013-07-17 04:53:22 PM
How proud you Republicans must be.
 
2013-07-17 04:54:53 PM

Dr Dreidel: Kredal: The way the law is written, it would make it a felony for normal, heterosexual, consenting adults to have oral sex too.  Ken Cuccinelli doesn't like blow jobs.

That is the stated point.

Kenny refuses to answer the question, though, if any of the sex he's ever had runs afoul of this proposed law.

AdolfOliverPanties: "My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They're intrinsically wrong. And I think in a natural law based country it's appropriate to have policies that reflect that. ... They don't comport with natural law."

Most animals engage in homosexuality.  Are animals not natural?  In fact, homo sapiens is the only species that both engages in homosexual acts and then actually gives a shiat about it.  THAT is what is unnatural.

Also, several animal species engage in sex for fun/pleasure - oral, anal (I think) and mutual handjobbery (or flipperjobbery, or paw...you get the point).


Yeah, but we've got thousands of busy bodies worrying about "proper" behavior that frankly, as long as it is between to consenting adults, is none of their farking business.
 
2013-07-17 04:55:31 PM
If his wife ain't giving head no ones wife can give head
 
2013-07-17 04:55:32 PM
Cant they just write it into the law that it only applies to children?   For Farks sake I have no idea what the angle is on this one.
 
2013-07-17 04:57:19 PM

meat0918: Dr Dreidel: Kredal: The way the law is written, it would make it a felony for normal, heterosexual, consenting adults to have oral sex too.  Ken Cuccinelli doesn't like blow jobs.

That is the stated point.

Kenny refuses to answer the question, though, if any of the sex he's ever had runs afoul of this proposed law.

AdolfOliverPanties: "My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They're intrinsically wrong. And I think in a natural law based country it's appropriate to have policies that reflect that. ... They don't comport with natural law."

Most animals engage in homosexuality.  Are animals not natural?  In fact, homo sapiens is the only species that both engages in homosexual acts and then actually gives a shiat about it.  THAT is what is unnatural.

Also, several animal species engage in sex for fun/pleasure - oral, anal (I think) and mutual handjobbery (or flipperjobbery, or paw...you get the point).

Yeah, but we've got thousands of busy bodies worrying about "proper" behavior that frankly, as long as it is between to consenting adults, is none of their farking business.


Just to play devil's advocate a bit, how far does consent stretch? Would you support, say, letting somebody consent to being slaughtered and eaten?
 
2013-07-17 04:57:28 PM

The Why Not Guy: How proud you Republicans must be.


Anybody who proudly states they are a member of either major party is a moron.
 
2013-07-17 04:57:37 PM

The Muthaship: oral sex and sodomy

Are the banning Snickers and candy bars, too?


Basically, we're all sodomites now. Well, everyone except people who only engage in sex where they have a significant chance of procreation.
 
2013-07-17 04:58:53 PM
I don't think banning blow jobs is going to be popular.
 
2013-07-17 04:59:51 PM

Serious Black: Just to play devil's advocate a bit, how far does consent stretch? Would you support, say, letting somebody consent to being slaughtered and eaten?


Not to answer for the meat, but I have no problem with assisted suicide and granting a person's wishes regarding the disposal of their remains.
 
2013-07-17 05:00:26 PM

The Muthaship: The Why Not Guy: How proud you Republicans must be.

Anybody who proudly states they are a member of either major party is a moron.


Are both sides bad?
 
2013-07-17 05:00:31 PM

Serious Black: Just to play devil's advocate a bit, how far does consent stretch


Sexual activity between consenting adults is the issue. If you and I consent to rob a bank. it doesn't make it any more legal, Facetious Black.
 
2013-07-17 05:01:10 PM

Serious Black: Just to play devil's advocate a bit, how far does consent stretch? Would you support, say, letting somebody consent to being slaughtered and eaten?


Killing someone is a bit more permanent then, say, half the posters here corn holing your mother.
 
2013-07-17 05:02:36 PM

James!: The Muthaship: The Why Not Guy: How proud you Republicans must be.

Anybody who proudly states they are a member of either major party is a moron.

Are both sides bad?


No, both sides a terrible.
 
2013-07-17 05:02:38 PM

AdolfOliverPanties: "My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They're intrinsically wrong. And I think in a natural law based country it's appropriate to have policies that reflect that. ... They don't comport with natural law."

Most animals engage in homosexuality.  Are animals not natural?  In fact, homo sapiens is the only species that both engages in homosexual acts and then actually gives a shiat about it.  THAT is what is unnatural.


The only natural laws are based on physics.
 
2013-07-17 05:03:43 PM

Serious Black: Aarontology: I think we really are at the point where "social conservative" has become a noun to describe someone who is constantly thinking about f*cking children.

Shiat, if that's all it takes to be a social conservative, then I suppose I'm a social conservative.


Finally, my internet sting yields fruit! Boy, the chief is gonna give me a promotion for this!
 
2013-07-17 05:03:45 PM

vygramul: An FBI agent once said that EVERY child predator owns substantial Star Trek memorabilia. It would make it easier to convict them by making that stuff illegal.

/It's because men who prey on children have things children like, not because there's some actual connection


Uh oh. I better take my blueprints down and hide my music box and phasers. :(
 
2013-07-17 05:04:42 PM

The Muthaship: James!: The Muthaship: The Why Not Guy: How proud you Republicans must be.

Anybody who proudly states they are a member of either major party is a moron.

Are both sides bad?

No, both sides a terrible.


Call me when both sides are trying to make blow-jobs illegal. Until then I'm voting Democrat.
 
2013-07-17 05:04:45 PM
Virginia is for boring lovers
 
2013-07-17 05:05:03 PM

o5iiawah: Cant they just write it into the law that it only applies to children?   For Farks sake I have no idea what the angle is on this one.


The angle is that, to him and other conservatives, only gay people perform "sodomy". So by banning sodomy, you ban gay people without actually saying you're banning gay people.

And to ensure no one tries to argue against the stupidity, you tie it to protecting the children, because then said person has to take the stance of arguing against protecting the children.
 
2013-07-17 05:05:31 PM

James!: Call me when both sides are trying to make blow-jobs illegal. Until then I'm voting Democrat


Hard to argue with that.
 
2013-07-17 05:07:51 PM
And the GOP goes on about how it wants to create jobs!
 
2013-07-17 05:08:22 PM

Kredal: The way the law is written, it would make it a felony for normal, heterosexual, consenting adults to have oral sex too.  Ken Cuccinelli doesn't like blow jobs.


There was a case a few years ago in GA where someone was convicted under the GA sodomy laws for oral sex.  When the prosecutor was asked why these sorts of prosecutions weren't more common, his response was "I would imagine there's a high rate of recidivism."
 
2013-07-17 05:09:25 PM

AdolfOliverPanties: "My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They're intrinsically wrong. And I think in a natural law based country it's appropriate to have policies that reflect that. ... They don't comport with natural law."

Most animals engage in homosexuality.  Are animals not natural?  In fact, homo sapiens is the only species that both engages in homosexual acts and then actually gives a shiat about it.  THAT is what is unnatural.


A natural law is like Newton's law of gravity or the three Laws of thermodynamics. No one needs to craft legislation to force people to follow said laws.

Legislative laws are, by definition, unnatural because they have to be agreed to. It's like to use of hands past the fifth yard by the cornerbacks in football. It's natural for a defensive player to want to use hands to slow or stymie the forward movement of a receiver, so the rule is in place to prevent the natural act.
 
2013-07-17 05:09:48 PM

Satanic_Hamster: Serious Black: Just to play devil's advocate a bit, how far does consent stretch? Would you support, say, letting somebody consent to being slaughtered and eaten?

Killing someone is a bit more permanent then, say, half the posters here corn holing your mother.


If a bunch of Farkers want to corn hole my mother, that's between them and her. I'll warn you that she's not much to look at after polio farked her up good as a kid.

PonceAlyosha: Sexual activity between consenting adults is the issue. If you and I consent to rob a bank. it doesn't make it any more legal, Facetious Black.


I like the new nickname! Also, I should note that the prosecutors admitted that the murder story I specifically linked to was done for sexual enjoyment.

James!: Not to answer for the meat, but I have no problem with assisted suicide and granting a person's wishes regarding the disposal of their remains.


Me neither, but I don't think suicide is the right answer in many cases. My ex tried to commit suicide when she was a freshman in college. She now has a kid and would trade nothing in the world for him.
 
2013-07-17 05:10:15 PM
For as slutty and promiscuous as liberals supposedly are, I've never met anyone who thinks about sex more than social conservatives.  And for as much as they think about it, their views of sex are wildly unrealistic.  They're the late night Cinemax of politics.
 
2013-07-17 05:12:04 PM
Some states use "crimes against nature" to be especially heavy-handed on prostitutes. Even though they're typically ancient laws that no one actually enforces, the cops can do it. For example, if I'm a female hooker and offer vaginal sex for money, that's one charge, and not a particularly big deal unless I'm a serial offender. However, if I offer oral or anal and the police bust in the motel room while I'm doing it (or, more likely, the john tells the cops that's what happened), that's a more serious charge.

This may have changed but I know that when I was in college in SC in the 90s, there was a big uproar about the cops basically railroading these poor women. Predictably, the men were systematically not charged with similar 'crimes.' "Soliciting prostitution" doesn't get your face and name printed in the back of the newspaper like rape, molestation or, yes, "crimes against nature" does. And they never elaborated. For all the reader knew, the published person could have been farking a possum. Although with all the teeth possums have I wouldn't recommend trying that.
 
2013-07-17 05:12:21 PM

Serious Black: meat0918: Dr Dreidel: Kredal: The way the law is written, it would make it a felony for normal, heterosexual, consenting adults to have oral sex too.  Ken Cuccinelli doesn't like blow jobs.

That is the stated point.

Kenny refuses to answer the question, though, if any of the sex he's ever had runs afoul of this proposed law.

AdolfOliverPanties: "My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They're intrinsically wrong. And I think in a natural law based country it's appropriate to have policies that reflect that. ... They don't comport with natural law."

Most animals engage in homosexuality.  Are animals not natural?  In fact, homo sapiens is the only species that both engages in homosexual acts and then actually gives a shiat about it.  THAT is what is unnatural.

Also, several animal species engage in sex for fun/pleasure - oral, anal (I think) and mutual handjobbery (or flipperjobbery, or paw...you get the point).

Yeah, but we've got thousands of busy bodies worrying about "proper" behavior that frankly, as long as it is between to consenting adults, is none of their farking business.

Just to play devil's advocate a bit, how far does consent stretch? Would you support, say, letting somebody consent to being slaughtered and eaten?


WTF are you on about?

We'd first need to know if such a person has the mental state to legally give consent, but I generally support assisted suicide.
 
2013-07-17 05:13:17 PM
It would be hysterical if he got caught up in one of those gay sex scandals that bedevil Republicans.

"I was only on that website looking for a strapping young lad to help me with my luggage.  I'm not interested in licking honey off his rippling abominals or something like that.  I also have no idea where that lube came from."
 
2013-07-17 05:16:05 PM

Serious Black: If a bunch of Farkers want to corn hole my mother, that's between them and her. I'll warn you that she's not much to look at after polio farked her up good as a kid.


www.nobodygoeshere.com
 
2013-07-17 05:16:22 PM

o5iiawah: Cant they just write it into the law that it only applies to children?


In 2004, a bipartisan group in the Virginia General Assembly backed a bill that would have brought the law in line with the Supreme Court's ruling. They proposed to eliminate the Crimes Against Nature law's provisions dealing with consenting adults in private and leaving in place provisions relating to prostitution, public sex, and those other than consenting adults. Cuccinelli opposed the bill in committee and helped kill it on the Senate floor.
 
2013-07-17 05:16:26 PM
I can just see all the job applications popping up expaining their felony convictions...
 
2013-07-17 05:16:50 PM

Codenamechaz: o5iiawah: Cant they just write it into the law that it only applies to children?   For Farks sake I have no idea what the angle is on this one.

The angle is that, to him and other conservatives, only gay people perform "sodomy". So by banning sodomy, you ban gay people without actually saying you're banning gay people.

And to ensure no one tries to argue against the stupidity, you tie it to protecting the children, because then said person has to take the stance of arguing against protecting the children.


So I guess rug munching by lezzies is all right with the Cooch.

/of course coochies the world over like rug munching.
 
2013-07-17 05:17:19 PM
*explaining

(or 'splaining)
 
2013-07-17 05:24:16 PM
The GOP is all about moral panic
 
2013-07-17 05:26:36 PM
You can take away oral sex when you can pry my cock from her cold, dead lips.
 
2013-07-17 05:27:18 PM
The new site, vachildpredators.com, highlights 90 people identified "sexual predators" in Virginia who have been charged under the  law since the 2003 ruling, which held that states could not ban private, non-commercial sexual relations between consenting adults.

90 people charged with a law that was struck down by the supreme court ten years ago.

i may live in a farked up state but there is farked up then there is VA.
 
2013-07-17 05:31:01 PM
These guys just keep talking, don't they? Talking, talking, talking. Abortion. Rape. Gays. Wash, rinse, repeat.

I have a great idea for a CPAC panel: "Want to Win Elections?: Learn how to stop shooting your candidacy in the foot by shutting the fark up."
 
2013-07-17 05:32:26 PM
I'm visiting your beautiful state tomorrow. Lets 69 each other.
encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com

I'm sorry Jessica, I believe oral sex is illegal.
images.politico.com

Wow, you are odd. I guess I'm going to go NC and contact hugram then.
encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com
 
2013-07-17 05:37:02 PM
Calvinists.
 
2013-07-17 05:43:06 PM

o5iiawah: Cant they just write it into the law that it only applies to children?   For Farks sake I have no idea what the angle is on this one.


Wouldn't that be covered under current child molestation laws?
 
2013-07-17 05:50:05 PM

Mentat: For as slutty and promiscuous as liberals supposedly are, I've never met anyone who thinks about sex more than social conservatives.  And for as much as they think about it, their views of sex are wildly unrealistic.  They're the late night Cinemax of politics.


My not-so-educated guess is that they are obsessed with sex to the point of perversion/addiction, and their way of controlling that obsession is projecting it onto everyone else.
 
2013-07-17 05:51:41 PM

Codenamechaz: o5iiawah: Cant they just write it into the law that it only applies to children?   For Farks sake I have no idea what the angle is on this one.

The angle is that, to him and other conservatives, only gay people perform "sodomy". So by banning sodomy, you ban gay people without actually saying you're banning gay people.

And to ensure no one tries to argue against the stupidity, you tie it to protecting the children, because then said person has to take the stance of arguing against protecting the children.



Because he's a bigot, and isn't brave enough to be an out of the closet bigot because even he knows that will likely cause him to not be elected again.
 
2013-07-17 05:52:21 PM

Blues_X: And the GOP goes on about how it wants to create jobs!


Dammit you!!! This was a brand new keyboard!!
 
2013-07-17 05:54:48 PM

Serious Black: Satanic_Hamster: Serious Black: Just to play devil's advocate a bit, how far does consent stretch? Would you support, say, letting somebody consent to being slaughtered and eaten?

Killing someone is a bit more permanent then, say, half the posters here corn holing your mother.

If a bunch of Farkers want to corn hole my mother, that's between them and her. I'll warn you that she's not much to look at after polio farked her up good as a kid.

PonceAlyosha: Sexual activity between consenting adults is the issue. If you and I consent to rob a bank. it doesn't make it any more legal, Facetious Black.

I like the new nickname! Also, I should note that the prosecutors admitted that the murder story I specifically linked to was done for sexual enjoyment.

James!: Not to answer for the meat, but I have no problem with assisted suicide and granting a person's wishes regarding the disposal of their remains.

Me neither, but I don't think suicide is the right answer in many cases. My ex tried to commit suicide when she was a freshman in college. She now has a kid and would trade nothing in the world for him.


There's a difference between assisted suicide of a person who is depressed and someone who is in stage five cancer dying in horrible pain in a hospital somewhere. Assisted Suicide is only really given for people who are dying and in a lot of pain.
 
2013-07-17 06:00:15 PM

AdolfOliverPanties: "My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They're intrinsically wrong. And I think in a natural law based country it's appropriate to have policies that reflect that. ... They don't comport with natural law."

Most animals engage in homosexuality.  Are animals not natural?  In fact, homo sapiens is the only species that both engages in homosexual acts and then actually gives a shiat about it.  THAT is what is unnatural.


The more interesting thing, is it's not just homosexuals that engage in oral sex and sodomy.  Heterosexuals do it too.  Does he not understand that?  Wait a minute....of course he doesn't.
 
2013-07-17 06:00:32 PM

mediablitz: You can take away oral sex when you can pry my cock from her cold, dead lips.


I prefer you can take away oral sex when you pry his hard cock from my warm, wet mouth.  Of course I'm coming from a different perspective :P.
 
2013-07-17 06:03:00 PM

Rev. Skarekroe: Aarontology: I think we really are at the point where "social conservative" has become a noun to describe someone who is constantly thinking about f*cking children.

No, see, this guy is constantly thinking about f*cking other men.  He just wants you to think that he's thinking about f*cking children


 Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli II went to a therapist  and said "Doc you got to help me I keep having this dream and it is driving me  crazy."
"What is this dream;"
"I dream I am having sex with a kid'"
"Okay is it a boy or a girl"
"A girl of course, what do you think I am some kind of pervert."
 
2013-07-17 06:05:26 PM

Serious Black: Aarontology: I think we really are at the point where "social conservative" has become a noun to describe someone who is constantly thinking about f*cking children.

Shiat, if that's all it takes to be a social conservative, then I suppose I'm a social conservative.


Wait, what?
 
2013-07-17 06:08:18 PM

red5ish: I don't think banning blow jobs is going to be popular.


Well maybe popular with married women, hey maybe this is Republican outreach to women.

/He really doesn't want to give his wife head so he will make everyone suffer.
 
2013-07-17 06:10:50 PM

Britney Spear's Speculum: The GOP is all about moral panic


Fascinating.
Many sociologists have pointed out the differences between definitions of a moral panic for American and British sociologists. Kenneth Thompson has said that American sociologists tend to emphasize psychological factors whereas the British portray moral panics as crises of capitalism.
Telling point, that.
 
2013-07-17 06:17:31 PM
Might as well ban all sex between anyone.  Makes as much logical sense as this assbag's argument.
 
2013-07-17 06:20:06 PM

busy chillin': Virginia is for boring lovers


nice.  my dad had a shirt (without the boring bit) like that.

dickfreckle: Serious Black: Aarontology: I think we really are at the point where "social conservative" has become a noun to describe someone who is constantly thinking about f*cking children.

Shiat, if that's all it takes to be a social conservative, then I suppose I'm a social conservative.

Finally, my internet sting yields fruit! Boy, the chief is gonna give me a promotion for this!


nope, you get a toaster oven.
 
2013-07-17 06:27:06 PM

spongeboob: red5ish: I don't think banning blow jobs is going to be popular.

Well maybe popular with married women, hey maybe this is Republican outreach to women.

/He really doesn't want to give his wife head so he will make everyone suffer.


Keep in mind, this would also ban eating pussy.
 
2013-07-17 06:35:04 PM

Dr Dreidel: flipperjobbery


You, sir, are a genius with a turn of phrase.
 
2013-07-17 06:36:52 PM

Satanic_Hamster: spongeboob: red5ish: I don't think banning blow jobs is going to be popular.

Well maybe popular with married women, hey maybe this is Republican outreach to women.

/He really doesn't want to give his wife head so he will make everyone suffer.

Keep in mind, this would also ban eating pussy.


Something tells me that social conservatives share the Soprano's opinion on that act youtube link but still probably NSFW
 
2013-07-17 06:49:49 PM
I like how these morans have co-opted the term "natural law" in a desperate, juvenile attempt at covering up their homophobia.
 
2013-07-17 06:56:32 PM
If you can't put someone in jail for child molestation unless they do something other than penis-in-vagina - then you suck as an attorney general and are in now way fit for a promotion.
 
2013-07-17 07:03:29 PM

Curious: The new site, vachildpredators.com, highlights 90 people identified "sexual predators" in Virginia who have been charged under the  law since the 2003 ruling, which held that states could not ban private, non-commercial sexual relations between consenting adults.

90 people charged with a law that was struck down by the supreme court ten years ago.

i may live in a farked up state but there is farked up then there is VA.


It's still on the books in my state for forced sexual contact only.  I was on a jury panel last month where an alleged adult male on adult female sexual assault was tried on one count of 1st degree rape and one count of 1st degree sodomy. (not chosen)
 
2013-07-17 07:04:57 PM

theknuckler_33: I like how these morans have co-opted the term "natural law" in a desperate, juvenile attempt at covering up their homophobia.


I just wish they understood that "natural law" includes homosexuality, as such relationships have been documented in human behavior for thousands of years. It's a null term, really - there's no "supernatural law" that stands in opposition, as pretty much ANYTHING WE DO is covered by a "natural law."
 
2013-07-17 07:07:44 PM

FormlessOne: theknuckler_33: I like how these morans have co-opted the term "natural law" in a desperate, juvenile attempt at covering up their homophobia.

I just wish they understood that "natural law" includes homosexuality, as such relationships have been documented in human behavior for thousands of years. It's a null term, really - there's no "supernatural law" that stands in opposition, as pretty much ANYTHING WE DO is covered by a "natural law."


Homosexuality has been documented in every mammalian species.  All of them.  It's more natural than traditional marriage or monogamy.
 
2013-07-17 07:14:38 PM

FormlessOne: theknuckler_33: I like how these morans have co-opted the term "natural law" in a desperate, juvenile attempt at covering up their homophobia.

I just wish they understood that "natural law" includes homosexuality, as such relationships have been documented in human behavior for thousands of years. It's a null term, really - there's no "supernatural law" that stands in opposition, as pretty much ANYTHING WE DO is covered by a "natural law."


oh i wish there was a "supernatural" law that included homosexuality... mmmm, deancest.
 
2013-07-17 07:18:06 PM

cynicalminion: FormlessOne: theknuckler_33: I like how these morans have co-opted the term "natural law" in a desperate, juvenile attempt at covering up their homophobia.

I just wish they understood that "natural law" includes homosexuality, as such relationships have been documented in human behavior for thousands of years. It's a null term, really - there's no "supernatural law" that stands in opposition, as pretty much ANYTHING WE DO is covered by a "natural law."

oh i wish there was a "supernatural" law that included homosexuality... mmmm, deancest.


and as an added bonus, they've got this friend they call momma cass... :D
 
2013-07-17 07:29:26 PM
Folks, the kind of natural law he is talking about has nothing to do with looking at what happens, statistically, in nature.  Instead, what he means is that God has revealed the moral order of the world to people in the workings of nature, but you have to look at nature in the right way in order to see it.  The right way, incidentally, is Evangelical Protestantism.
 
2013-07-17 07:30:43 PM

logic523: Folks, the kind of natural law he is talking about has nothing to do with looking at what happens, statistically, in nature.  Instead, what he means is that God has revealed the moral order of the world to people in the workings of nature, but you have to look at nature in the right way in order to see it.  The right way, incidentally, is Evangelical Protestantism.


Or Roman Catholicism.  Really any Christian denomination that hates teh gehys.
 
2013-07-17 07:31:58 PM

toomuchwhargarbl: Calvinists.


No. Cuccinelli is a hardcore Catholic like Santorum.
 
2013-07-17 07:36:22 PM
Leave it to the Republicans to find a way to "blow" an election.
 
2013-07-17 07:36:46 PM
Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli II (R) is a pedophile?

Wow, someone better get that child farker in prison right now.
 
2013-07-17 07:47:44 PM

red5ish: I don't think banning blow jobs is going to be popular.


Except with wives :p
 
2013-07-17 07:50:25 PM

Scaevola: toomuchwhargarbl: Calvinists.

No. Cuccinelli is a hardcore Catholic like Santorum.


Death Penalty not staunchly against so not the Catholic position
Safety Net can't find his position, good Catholics should be in support of the safety net.


So Conservative Catholic maybe but not following current Catholic positions if they disagree with a conservative position.
 
2013-07-17 08:01:23 PM
keep farking that chicken asshole
 
2013-07-17 08:08:31 PM

James!: Arachnophobe: Jackson Herring: James!: And it would just be struck down again.

much like my boner

Your boner will become more powerful than we can possibly imagine?

It'll be just an empty robe and eventually reappear with a bunch of other dead penises as a hologram.


Mine was later digitally replaced by Hayden Christiensen.
 
2013-07-17 08:09:58 PM

spongeboob: current Catholic positions


Missionary?
 
2013-07-17 08:20:58 PM
Shut up, Coochysmelly; you cock!
 
2013-07-17 08:27:44 PM
Everyone hates this guy.  Even McDonnell hates him.
 
2013-07-17 08:29:48 PM
SovietCanuckistan: "If I ain't havin' fun, NOBODY can!!"

The sad thing is, Cuccinelli's idea of having fun is stomping kittens to death, waterboarding widows and orphans, and throwing old women out on the street.
 
2013-07-17 08:32:31 PM

o5iiawah: Cant they just write it into the law that it only applies to children?   For Farks sake I have no idea what the angle is on this one.


Courting the Hate Vote, not realizing that people full of hate are a minority.  Hell, if the GOP knew that bigots were a minority, they'd probably try to cut their funding and keep them away from the polling stations through churlish hijinks.

Holy hell, maybe there's an idea blossoming here.
 
2013-07-17 08:33:49 PM

Nicholas D. Wolfwood: SovietCanuckistan: "If I ain't havin' fun, NOBODY can!!"

The sad thing is, Cuccinelli's idea of having fun is stomping kittens to death, waterboarding widows and orphans, and throwing old women out on the street.


i0.wp.com
 
2013-07-17 08:35:23 PM

fusillade762: spongeboob: current Catholic positions

Missionary?


Thanks now I have to Google Catholic sexual positions because you have made wonder if there are APPROVED Catholic positions.
 
2013-07-17 08:39:02 PM
There must be some conservatives on fark ready to defend their party on this one... come on. Which one of you are going to step up?!
 
2013-07-17 08:42:18 PM

busy chillin': Virginia is for boring lovers


i915.photobucket.com
 
2013-07-17 09:01:15 PM

johnryan51: Good luck with that! The prisons are going to be bursting at the seams.


I bring up laws like this during my clearance investigations.  Like a rules lawyering dnd player, I drive the investigator insane until they eventually tell me to just stop, please just stop.

But in all honesty, I do like to bring up the fact that laws like this means that nearly every person in the defense industry has committed a felony.

(Lots of us in VA)
 
2013-07-17 09:04:45 PM
Okay,the juror poster above made me realize there is one occasion when I'm okay with anti-sodomy laws:as a rider when a rapist uses objects other than body parts. Sort of like special circumstances clauses for murder charges.

Otherwise, I really enjoy giving blowjobs. I'd rather not go to jail for them.
 
2013-07-17 09:10:15 PM
Peki:

Otherwise, I really enjoy giving blowjobs. I'd rather not go to jail for them.

Not sure if you are male or female, but allow me to say this:

Don't ever change.
 
2013-07-17 09:10:23 PM

Scaevola: toomuchwhargarbl: Calvinists.

No. Cuccinelli is a hardcore Catholic like Santorum.


So basically the Catholic church pays no taxes but now they're begging us to make their guys stop buggering children?
 
2013-07-17 09:16:09 PM

Scaevola: toomuchwhargarbl: Calvinists.

No. Cuccinelli is a hardcore Catholicking Santorum.


/ftfy
 
2013-07-17 09:18:33 PM
Jello Biafra was right.  Banning anything sexual is how social conservatives masturbate.  It's all about control.
 
2013-07-17 09:21:44 PM

Pants full of macaroni!!: Jello Biafra was right.  Banning anything sexual is how social conservatives masturbate.  It's all about control.


dammit, now i have "holiday in cambodia" back in my earworm...
 
2013-07-17 09:28:33 PM

Peki: Okay,the juror poster above made me realize there is one occasion when I'm okay with anti-sodomy laws:as a rider when a rapist uses objects other than body parts. Sort of like special circumstances clauses for murder charges.

Otherwise, I really enjoy giving blowjobs. I'd rather not go to jail for them.


How YOU doin'?
 
2013-07-17 09:30:24 PM
"If any person carnally knows in any manner any brute animal, or carnally knows any male or female person by the anus or by or with the mouth, or voluntarily submits to such carnal knowledge, he or she shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony..."

Now, they could remove this one word, and solve about 30% of the problem right there. Or change the phrasing. Make it clear, if they must, that the law is not about SEX but about RAPE--if only that were their intent. If their intent were to protect children--who cannot consent to sex, no matter what kind of sex it is--then making the law clear by its language that it is about "carnal knowledge" without consent should solve their difficulties.

But obviously a guy who spent his formative years being mercilessly teased about being called COOCHI-nelly can't handle any kind of sex, voluntary or not.
 
2013-07-17 09:30:28 PM

Kredal: The way the law is written, it would make it a felony for normal, heterosexual, consenting adults to have oral sex too.  Ken Cuccinelli doesn't like blow jobs.


That's not a bug.  That's a feature.
 
2013-07-17 09:34:16 PM

fusillade762: Mine was later digitally replaced by Hayden Christiensen.


Well, at least it's now a huge dick.
 
2013-07-17 09:36:14 PM
The Party of Freedom and Small Government®, ladies and gentlemen.

/Freedom?  That is a worship-word.   You will not speak it.
//Freedom?  You keep using that word.  I do not think it means what you think it means.
 
2013-07-17 09:48:27 PM

o5iiawah: Cant they just write it into the law that it only applies to children?   For Farks sake I have no idea what the angle is on this one.


Really? No idea?

Decades of queer bashing, porn censorship, abstinence fetishism, and literally opposing HPV vaccination... and you still haven't figured out that right-wingers simply hate sex?
 
2013-07-17 09:50:27 PM

JohnnyC: There must be some conservatives on fark ready to defend their party on this one... come on. Which one of you are going to step up?!


I think they're all still busy White Knighting Ted Nugent two threads up.
 
2013-07-17 09:58:17 PM
Bloomberg can tell you how much soda you can buy or how much salt can be added to your food, so there's really no reason somebody else can't tell you what kind of sex you're allowed to have, is there?
 
2013-07-17 09:59:25 PM

Kredal: The way the law is written, it would make it a felony for normal, heterosexual, consenting adults to have oral sex too.  Ken Cuccinelli doesn't like get blow jobs.


AND NEITHER SHOULD YOU!!!!!
 
2013-07-17 10:10:19 PM

jjorsett: Bloomberg hurr durr NO U!


If you're trying to make some point about the Democratic Party, you might do well to pick a Democratic politician.
 
2013-07-17 10:14:40 PM
If this guy has kids, and they are teens or older, they are openly mocked at school.
 
2013-07-17 10:27:59 PM

jjorsett: Bloomberg can tell you how much soda you can buy or how much salt can be added to your food, so there's really no reason somebody else can't tell you what kind of sex you're allowed to have, is there?


Last I heard oral sex doesn't make you fat or give you diabetes.
 
2013-07-17 10:30:17 PM

jjorsett: Bloomberg can tell you how much soda you can buy or how much salt can be added to your food, so there's really no reason somebody else can't tell you what kind of sex you're allowed to have, is there?


Bloomberg's soda ban is dumb and should be rolled back. But, to his credit at least his intent was to help solve real public health problems.

This sodomy law? Not so much.
 
2013-07-17 10:30:28 PM

fusillade762: jjorsett: Bloomberg can tell you how much soda you can buy or how much salt can be added to your food, so there's really no reason somebody else can't tell you what kind of sex you're allowed to have, is there?

Last I heard oral sex doesn't make you fat or give you diabetes.


It is possible to catch STD's through oral, though. But hey, I'm sure the ultra-right will welcome you in declaring the government does have a right to say what you do with your body.

/How about "no" to the control freaks from any party?
 
2013-07-17 10:36:25 PM

Aarontology: I think we really are at the point where "social conservative" has become a noun to describe someone who is constantly thinking about f*cking children.


And f*cking animals, don't forget about the animals. Because we all know the gay lifestyle is a slippery slope to bestiality....and then to polygamous robotic necrophilia bestiality
 
2013-07-17 10:40:47 PM

jjorsett: Bloomberg can tell you how much soda you can buy or how much salt can be added to your food, so there's really no reason somebody else can't tell you what kind of sex you're allowed to have, is there?

You need to read this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueZ6tvqhk8U

 
2013-07-17 11:41:12 PM

encyclopediaplushuman: Aarontology: I think we really are at the point where "social conservative" has become a noun to describe someone who is constantly thinking about f*cking children.

And f*cking animals, don't forget about the animals. Because we all know the gay lifestyle is a slippery slope to bestiality....and then to polygamous robotic necrophilia bestiality


You say that like it's a bad thing.
 
2013-07-17 11:57:23 PM

Gyrfalcon: encyclopediaplushuman: Aarontology: I think we really are at the point where "social conservative" has become a noun to describe someone who is constantly thinking about f*cking children.

And f*cking animals, don't forget about the animals. Because we all know the gay lifestyle is a slippery slope to bestiality....and then to polygamous robotic necrophilia bestiality

You say that like it's a bad thing.


Hey, if they're dead who cares?
 
2013-07-18 12:33:43 AM
Just another control-happy social conservative hiding behind 'the children'.
 
2013-07-18 01:25:03 AM

AdolfOliverPanties: "My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They're intrinsically wrong. And I think in a natural law based country it's appropriate to have policies that reflect that. ... They don't comport with natural law."

Most animals engage in homosexuality.  Are animals not natural?  In fact, homo sapiens is the only species that both engages in homosexual acts and then actually gives a shiat about it.  THAT is what is unnatural.


[riverdolphinblowholesex.jpg]

Posting an actual image might be too weird for fark, but they're out there.
 
2013-07-18 01:43:15 AM

mediablitz: You can take away oral sex when you can pry my cock from her cold, dead lips.


You're probably doing it wrong.
 
2013-07-18 01:48:09 AM

PillsHere: mediablitz: You can take away oral sex when you can pry my cock from her cold, dead lips.

I prefer you can take away oral sex when you pry his hard cock from my warm, wet mouth.  Of course I'm coming from a different perspective :P.


I guess "How YOU doin'?" is obligatory.
 
2013-07-18 02:38:12 AM

AdolfOliverPanties: "My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They're intrinsically wrong. And I think in a natural law based country it's appropriate to have policies that reflect that. ... They don't comport with natural law."

Most animals engage in homosexuality.  Are animals not natural?  In fact, homo sapiens is the only species that both engages in homosexual acts and then actually gives a shiat about it.  THAT is what is unnatural.


Eh, animals kill each other for stuff related to mating all the time, especially mammals.  We're not really all that special in the 'giving a shiat' department either.

Also, this is a bad argument because nature is a horrible thing that wants to kill us all and the entire existence of our species in its current form is rightly a never-ending quest to get as far farking away from a natural state as possible without destroying our own food supply.  Homosexuality being natural is an association that implies that it's worse for humanity than we thought, not better.

//Next time you're out for a walk in the woods "enjoying nature" remind yourself that most likely the actual natural state of the area you're in is a flat plane where the vegetation is regularly purged by raging wildfires.  If you're enjoying the natural sounds of the river remind yourself that a river is "naturally" a trap for predators to catch and eat shiat in the middle of the food chain like plains apes.  Nature can farking suck it in more than just the aforementioned literal sense.
 
2013-07-18 02:41:15 AM
There it's no easier way to whip up a rabid & frenzied mob complete with torches & pitchforks than to say "child molestation" or "child predator." I'm just surprised no one's tried connecting the economic crisis, ACA or taxes to child molestation.
 
2013-07-18 09:49:52 AM

jjorsett: Bloomberg can tell you how much soda you can buy or how much salt can be added to your food, so there's really no reason somebody else can't tell you what kind of sex you're allowed to have, is there?


You're right. Bloomberg got to do that, so this farkface gets to do this. Tit for tat rules the day. Well, not tit. That's immoral.
 
2013-07-18 10:08:36 AM

PillsHere: mediablitz: You can take away oral sex when you can pry my cock from her cold, dead lips.

I prefer you can take away oral sex when you pry his hard cock from my warm, wet mouth.  Of course I'm coming from a different perspective :P.


How YOU doin?
 
2013-07-18 10:18:45 AM
This dude's wife is rubbing one out to an erotic bondage story at this very moment.
 
2013-07-18 10:33:57 AM
This just in: Republicans have no awareness of Historical Precedent.
 
2013-07-18 10:44:00 AM

spongeboob: Scaevola: toomuchwhargarbl: Calvinists.

No. Cuccinelli is a hardcore Catholic like Santorum.

Death Penalty not staunchly against so not the Catholic position
Safety Net can't find his position, good Catholics should be in support of the safety net.


So Conservative Catholic maybe but not following current Catholic positions if they disagree with a conservative position.


Hence my observation: "like Santorum."
 
2013-07-18 02:25:39 PM

fusillade762: jjorsett: Bloomberg can tell you how much soda you can buy or how much salt can be added to your food, so there's really no reason somebody else can't tell you what kind of sex you're allowed to have, is there?

Last I heard oral sex doesn't make you fat or give you diabetes.


What if I'm sucking the Kool-Aid Man's dick, huh?
 
2013-07-18 03:03:48 PM

Gyrfalcon: Make it clear, if they must, that the law is not about SEX but about RAPE


I'm pretty sure rape is already illegal, even in a place like Virginia.
 
2013-07-18 03:50:55 PM
This will surely create more jobs and fix the economy.

Seriously, it's amazing how much Republicans obsess with sex and body parts to the point where they want small government to regulate and prosecute every single aspect of them.
 
2013-07-18 06:50:48 PM

FirstNationalBastard: fusillade762: jjorsett: Bloomberg can tell you how much soda you can buy or how much salt can be added to your food, so there's really no reason somebody else can't tell you what kind of sex you're allowed to have, is there?

Last I heard oral sex doesn't make you fat or give you diabetes.

What if I'm sucking the Kool-Aid Man's dick, huh?


OH YEAH!
 
2013-07-19 12:34:14 AM
This was on Fark before.  It seems that the age consent in VA is 16, so in order to convict older guys for boinking 16 year olds, they'd have to bust them on sodomy laws.

Which no longer exist.

So, think of the children.
 
2013-07-19 12:38:53 AM

sendtodave: This was on Fark before.  It seems that the age consent in VA is 16, so in order to convict older guys for boinking 16 year olds, they'd have to bust them on sodomy laws.

Which no longer exist.

So, think of the children.


Yeah, and it was explained in the last thread how stupid this idea was.

/Stop thinking about the children, unless you want to have a seat over there!
 
2013-07-19 01:18:01 AM
 
Displayed 143 of 143 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report