If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Think Progress)   Candidate in VA governor's race campaigns on attempting to restore unconstitutional ban on oral sex and sodomy. Tag: By tying it to child molestation   (thinkprogress.org) divider line 143
    More: Asinine, Virginia, child molestation, political campaigns, oral sex, Attorney General of Virginia, Virginia General Assembly, Cuccinelli, public sex  
•       •       •

2019 clicks; posted to Politics » on 17 Jul 2013 at 4:43 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



143 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-07-17 02:22:14 PM  
I think we really are at the point where "social conservative" has become a noun to describe someone who is constantly thinking about f*cking children.
 
2013-07-17 02:28:12 PM  
oral sex and sodomy

Are the banning Snickers and candy bars, too?
 
2013-07-17 02:34:05 PM  

Aarontology: I think we really are at the point where "social conservative" has become a noun to describe someone who is constantly thinking about f*cking children.


And animals.
 
2013-07-17 02:45:11 PM  
And it would just be struck down again.
 
2013-07-17 02:50:44 PM  
"My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They're intrinsically wrong. And I think in a natural law based country it's appropriate to have policies that reflect that. ... They don't comport with natural law."

Most animals engage in homosexuality.  Are animals not natural?  In fact, homo sapiens is the only species that both engages in homosexual acts and then actually gives a shiat about it.  THAT is what is unnatural.
 
2013-07-17 02:52:50 PM  
The way the law is written, it would make it a felony for normal, heterosexual, consenting adults to have oral sex too.  Ken Cuccinelli doesn't like blow jobs.
 
2013-07-17 03:00:06 PM  

Aarontology: I think we really are at the point where "social conservative" has become a noun to describe someone who is constantly thinking about f*cking children.


No, see, this guy is constantly thinking about f*cking other men.  He just wants you to think that he's thinking about f*cking children.
 
2013-07-17 03:01:38 PM  
If you tell someone with their head up their ass to go fark themselves, can they perform oral on themselves at the same time?
 
2013-07-17 03:05:31 PM  
An FBI agent once said that EVERY child predator owns substantial Star Trek memorabilia. It would make it easier to convict them by making that stuff illegal.

/It's because men who prey on children have things children like, not because there's some actual connection
 
2013-07-17 03:05:40 PM  

Kredal: The way the law is written, it would make it a felony for normal, heterosexual, consenting adults to have oral sex too.  Ken Cuccinelli doesn't like blow jobs.


That is the stated point.

Kenny refuses to answer the question, though, if any of the sex he's ever had runs afoul of this proposed law.

AdolfOliverPanties: "My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They're intrinsically wrong. And I think in a natural law based country it's appropriate to have policies that reflect that. ... They don't comport with natural law."

Most animals engage in homosexuality.  Are animals not natural?  In fact, homo sapiens is the only species that both engages in homosexual acts and then actually gives a shiat about it.  THAT is what is unnatural.


Also, several animal species engage in sex for fun/pleasure - oral, anal (I think) and mutual handjobbery (or flipperjobbery, or paw...you get the point).
 
2013-07-17 03:06:07 PM  

Kredal: The way the law is written, it would make it a felony for normal, heterosexual, consenting adults to have oral sex too.  Ken Cuccinelli doesn't like blow jobs.


If his wife doesn't perform and he can't have them, no one can.
 
2013-07-17 03:12:41 PM  
Good luck with that! The prisons are going to be bursting at the seams.
 
2013-07-17 04:38:26 PM  
Ah...suck it, Cooch-i-nelli!
 
2013-07-17 04:41:21 PM  

James!: And it would just be struck down again.


much like my boner
 
2013-07-17 04:48:30 PM  

Jackson Herring: James!: And it would just be struck down again.

much like my boner


Your boner will become more powerful than we can possibly imagine?
 
2013-07-17 04:50:17 PM  

Arachnophobe: Jackson Herring: James!: And it would just be struck down again.

much like my boner

Your boner will become more powerful than we can possibly imagine?


It'll be just an empty robe and eventually reappear with a bunch of other dead penises as a hologram.
 
2013-07-17 04:51:32 PM  
Laser like focus on small government.
 
2013-07-17 04:52:16 PM  
"If I ain't havin' fun, NOBODY can!!"
 
2013-07-17 04:52:34 PM  

Aarontology: I think we really are at the point where "social conservative" has become a noun to describe someone who is constantly thinking about f*cking children.


Shiat, if that's all it takes to be a social conservative, then I suppose I'm a social conservative.
 
2013-07-17 04:53:11 PM  

alienated: Laser like focus on small government.


Small enough to fit inside a mouth or a rectum for sure.
 
2013-07-17 04:53:22 PM  
How proud you Republicans must be.
 
2013-07-17 04:54:53 PM  

Dr Dreidel: Kredal: The way the law is written, it would make it a felony for normal, heterosexual, consenting adults to have oral sex too.  Ken Cuccinelli doesn't like blow jobs.

That is the stated point.

Kenny refuses to answer the question, though, if any of the sex he's ever had runs afoul of this proposed law.

AdolfOliverPanties: "My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They're intrinsically wrong. And I think in a natural law based country it's appropriate to have policies that reflect that. ... They don't comport with natural law."

Most animals engage in homosexuality.  Are animals not natural?  In fact, homo sapiens is the only species that both engages in homosexual acts and then actually gives a shiat about it.  THAT is what is unnatural.

Also, several animal species engage in sex for fun/pleasure - oral, anal (I think) and mutual handjobbery (or flipperjobbery, or paw...you get the point).


Yeah, but we've got thousands of busy bodies worrying about "proper" behavior that frankly, as long as it is between to consenting adults, is none of their farking business.
 
2013-07-17 04:55:31 PM  
If his wife ain't giving head no ones wife can give head
 
2013-07-17 04:55:32 PM  
Cant they just write it into the law that it only applies to children?   For Farks sake I have no idea what the angle is on this one.
 
2013-07-17 04:57:19 PM  

meat0918: Dr Dreidel: Kredal: The way the law is written, it would make it a felony for normal, heterosexual, consenting adults to have oral sex too.  Ken Cuccinelli doesn't like blow jobs.

That is the stated point.

Kenny refuses to answer the question, though, if any of the sex he's ever had runs afoul of this proposed law.

AdolfOliverPanties: "My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They're intrinsically wrong. And I think in a natural law based country it's appropriate to have policies that reflect that. ... They don't comport with natural law."

Most animals engage in homosexuality.  Are animals not natural?  In fact, homo sapiens is the only species that both engages in homosexual acts and then actually gives a shiat about it.  THAT is what is unnatural.

Also, several animal species engage in sex for fun/pleasure - oral, anal (I think) and mutual handjobbery (or flipperjobbery, or paw...you get the point).

Yeah, but we've got thousands of busy bodies worrying about "proper" behavior that frankly, as long as it is between to consenting adults, is none of their farking business.


Just to play devil's advocate a bit, how far does consent stretch? Would you support, say, letting somebody consent to being slaughtered and eaten?
 
2013-07-17 04:57:28 PM  

The Why Not Guy: How proud you Republicans must be.


Anybody who proudly states they are a member of either major party is a moron.
 
2013-07-17 04:57:37 PM  

The Muthaship: oral sex and sodomy

Are the banning Snickers and candy bars, too?


Basically, we're all sodomites now. Well, everyone except people who only engage in sex where they have a significant chance of procreation.
 
2013-07-17 04:58:53 PM  
I don't think banning blow jobs is going to be popular.
 
2013-07-17 04:59:51 PM  

Serious Black: Just to play devil's advocate a bit, how far does consent stretch? Would you support, say, letting somebody consent to being slaughtered and eaten?


Not to answer for the meat, but I have no problem with assisted suicide and granting a person's wishes regarding the disposal of their remains.
 
2013-07-17 05:00:26 PM  

The Muthaship: The Why Not Guy: How proud you Republicans must be.

Anybody who proudly states they are a member of either major party is a moron.


Are both sides bad?
 
2013-07-17 05:00:31 PM  

Serious Black: Just to play devil's advocate a bit, how far does consent stretch


Sexual activity between consenting adults is the issue. If you and I consent to rob a bank. it doesn't make it any more legal, Facetious Black.
 
2013-07-17 05:01:10 PM  

Serious Black: Just to play devil's advocate a bit, how far does consent stretch? Would you support, say, letting somebody consent to being slaughtered and eaten?


Killing someone is a bit more permanent then, say, half the posters here corn holing your mother.
 
2013-07-17 05:02:36 PM  

James!: The Muthaship: The Why Not Guy: How proud you Republicans must be.

Anybody who proudly states they are a member of either major party is a moron.

Are both sides bad?


No, both sides a terrible.
 
2013-07-17 05:02:38 PM  

AdolfOliverPanties: "My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They're intrinsically wrong. And I think in a natural law based country it's appropriate to have policies that reflect that. ... They don't comport with natural law."

Most animals engage in homosexuality.  Are animals not natural?  In fact, homo sapiens is the only species that both engages in homosexual acts and then actually gives a shiat about it.  THAT is what is unnatural.


The only natural laws are based on physics.
 
2013-07-17 05:03:43 PM  

Serious Black: Aarontology: I think we really are at the point where "social conservative" has become a noun to describe someone who is constantly thinking about f*cking children.

Shiat, if that's all it takes to be a social conservative, then I suppose I'm a social conservative.


Finally, my internet sting yields fruit! Boy, the chief is gonna give me a promotion for this!
 
2013-07-17 05:03:45 PM  

vygramul: An FBI agent once said that EVERY child predator owns substantial Star Trek memorabilia. It would make it easier to convict them by making that stuff illegal.

/It's because men who prey on children have things children like, not because there's some actual connection


Uh oh. I better take my blueprints down and hide my music box and phasers. :(
 
2013-07-17 05:04:42 PM  

The Muthaship: James!: The Muthaship: The Why Not Guy: How proud you Republicans must be.

Anybody who proudly states they are a member of either major party is a moron.

Are both sides bad?

No, both sides a terrible.


Call me when both sides are trying to make blow-jobs illegal. Until then I'm voting Democrat.
 
2013-07-17 05:04:45 PM  
Virginia is for boring lovers
 
2013-07-17 05:05:03 PM  

o5iiawah: Cant they just write it into the law that it only applies to children?   For Farks sake I have no idea what the angle is on this one.


The angle is that, to him and other conservatives, only gay people perform "sodomy". So by banning sodomy, you ban gay people without actually saying you're banning gay people.

And to ensure no one tries to argue against the stupidity, you tie it to protecting the children, because then said person has to take the stance of arguing against protecting the children.
 
2013-07-17 05:05:31 PM  

James!: Call me when both sides are trying to make blow-jobs illegal. Until then I'm voting Democrat


Hard to argue with that.
 
2013-07-17 05:07:51 PM  
And the GOP goes on about how it wants to create jobs!
 
2013-07-17 05:08:22 PM  

Kredal: The way the law is written, it would make it a felony for normal, heterosexual, consenting adults to have oral sex too.  Ken Cuccinelli doesn't like blow jobs.


There was a case a few years ago in GA where someone was convicted under the GA sodomy laws for oral sex.  When the prosecutor was asked why these sorts of prosecutions weren't more common, his response was "I would imagine there's a high rate of recidivism."
 
2013-07-17 05:09:25 PM  

AdolfOliverPanties: "My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They're intrinsically wrong. And I think in a natural law based country it's appropriate to have policies that reflect that. ... They don't comport with natural law."

Most animals engage in homosexuality.  Are animals not natural?  In fact, homo sapiens is the only species that both engages in homosexual acts and then actually gives a shiat about it.  THAT is what is unnatural.


A natural law is like Newton's law of gravity or the three Laws of thermodynamics. No one needs to craft legislation to force people to follow said laws.

Legislative laws are, by definition, unnatural because they have to be agreed to. It's like to use of hands past the fifth yard by the cornerbacks in football. It's natural for a defensive player to want to use hands to slow or stymie the forward movement of a receiver, so the rule is in place to prevent the natural act.
 
2013-07-17 05:09:48 PM  

Satanic_Hamster: Serious Black: Just to play devil's advocate a bit, how far does consent stretch? Would you support, say, letting somebody consent to being slaughtered and eaten?

Killing someone is a bit more permanent then, say, half the posters here corn holing your mother.


If a bunch of Farkers want to corn hole my mother, that's between them and her. I'll warn you that she's not much to look at after polio farked her up good as a kid.

PonceAlyosha: Sexual activity between consenting adults is the issue. If you and I consent to rob a bank. it doesn't make it any more legal, Facetious Black.


I like the new nickname! Also, I should note that the prosecutors admitted that the murder story I specifically linked to was done for sexual enjoyment.

James!: Not to answer for the meat, but I have no problem with assisted suicide and granting a person's wishes regarding the disposal of their remains.


Me neither, but I don't think suicide is the right answer in many cases. My ex tried to commit suicide when she was a freshman in college. She now has a kid and would trade nothing in the world for him.
 
2013-07-17 05:10:15 PM  
For as slutty and promiscuous as liberals supposedly are, I've never met anyone who thinks about sex more than social conservatives.  And for as much as they think about it, their views of sex are wildly unrealistic.  They're the late night Cinemax of politics.
 
2013-07-17 05:12:04 PM  
Some states use "crimes against nature" to be especially heavy-handed on prostitutes. Even though they're typically ancient laws that no one actually enforces, the cops can do it. For example, if I'm a female hooker and offer vaginal sex for money, that's one charge, and not a particularly big deal unless I'm a serial offender. However, if I offer oral or anal and the police bust in the motel room while I'm doing it (or, more likely, the john tells the cops that's what happened), that's a more serious charge.

This may have changed but I know that when I was in college in SC in the 90s, there was a big uproar about the cops basically railroading these poor women. Predictably, the men were systematically not charged with similar 'crimes.' "Soliciting prostitution" doesn't get your face and name printed in the back of the newspaper like rape, molestation or, yes, "crimes against nature" does. And they never elaborated. For all the reader knew, the published person could have been farking a possum. Although with all the teeth possums have I wouldn't recommend trying that.
 
2013-07-17 05:12:21 PM  

Serious Black: meat0918: Dr Dreidel: Kredal: The way the law is written, it would make it a felony for normal, heterosexual, consenting adults to have oral sex too.  Ken Cuccinelli doesn't like blow jobs.

That is the stated point.

Kenny refuses to answer the question, though, if any of the sex he's ever had runs afoul of this proposed law.

AdolfOliverPanties: "My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They're intrinsically wrong. And I think in a natural law based country it's appropriate to have policies that reflect that. ... They don't comport with natural law."

Most animals engage in homosexuality.  Are animals not natural?  In fact, homo sapiens is the only species that both engages in homosexual acts and then actually gives a shiat about it.  THAT is what is unnatural.

Also, several animal species engage in sex for fun/pleasure - oral, anal (I think) and mutual handjobbery (or flipperjobbery, or paw...you get the point).

Yeah, but we've got thousands of busy bodies worrying about "proper" behavior that frankly, as long as it is between to consenting adults, is none of their farking business.

Just to play devil's advocate a bit, how far does consent stretch? Would you support, say, letting somebody consent to being slaughtered and eaten?


WTF are you on about?

We'd first need to know if such a person has the mental state to legally give consent, but I generally support assisted suicide.
 
2013-07-17 05:13:17 PM  
It would be hysterical if he got caught up in one of those gay sex scandals that bedevil Republicans.

"I was only on that website looking for a strapping young lad to help me with my luggage.  I'm not interested in licking honey off his rippling abominals or something like that.  I also have no idea where that lube came from."
 
2013-07-17 05:16:05 PM  

Serious Black: If a bunch of Farkers want to corn hole my mother, that's between them and her. I'll warn you that she's not much to look at after polio farked her up good as a kid.


www.nobodygoeshere.com
 
2013-07-17 05:16:22 PM  

o5iiawah: Cant they just write it into the law that it only applies to children?


In 2004, a bipartisan group in the Virginia General Assembly backed a bill that would have brought the law in line with the Supreme Court's ruling. They proposed to eliminate the Crimes Against Nature law's provisions dealing with consenting adults in private and leaving in place provisions relating to prostitution, public sex, and those other than consenting adults. Cuccinelli opposed the bill in committee and helped kill it on the Senate floor.
 
Displayed 50 of 143 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report