If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(MSN)   Zimmerman worried about vigilantes who may try to take the law into their own hands   (news.msn.com) divider line 824
    More: Ironic, George Zimmerman, attorney-in-fact, Latin phrases, Mark O'Mara, manslaughter  
•       •       •

7841 clicks; posted to Main » on 14 Jul 2013 at 4:06 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



824 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-07-14 08:18:17 PM

amiable: This ruling has basically given the greenlight to every yahoo in Florida to shoot someone in private and claim they "were in fear for their life." Protip: I would not try that while being black.


But you can do this while Hispanic?  I don't get why you think this is a race thing that something that a Hispanic person can do, other people can't.  can you explain that?
 
2013-07-14 08:19:14 PM
Carth:

32 states have stand your ground laws with terms similar to Florida.

This isn't stand-your-ground laws, this has to do with burden of proof for self-defense charges.  It's an entirely different issue.

Also if you want your citation look at common-law, you will find that self defense is an affirmative defense.
 
2013-07-14 08:21:13 PM
tenpoundsofcheese:

oh look.  another person who doesn't know what an affirmative defense it.

Please enlighten me.  Do you have a GED in law as well?
 
2013-07-14 08:24:51 PM

amiable: Carth:

32 states have stand your ground laws with terms similar to Florida.

This isn't stand-your-ground laws, this has to do with burden of proof for self-defense charges.


you are digging in on this, huh?
you still don't know what an affirmative defense is with respect to burden of proof.
you are watching too much MSNBC.
 
2013-07-14 08:25:19 PM

tenpoundsofcheese: amiable: This ruling has basically given the greenlight to every yahoo in Florida to shoot someone in private and claim they "were in fear for their life." Protip: I would not try that while being black.

But you can do this while Hispanic?  I don't get why you think this is a race thing that something that a Hispanic person can do, other people can't.  can you explain that?


I'm saying if a black dude stalked and killed a white (or hispanic) kid in a neighborhood where they lived because he "looked suspicious" and then claimed self-defense after he was found over the body with the gun the situation would have had a very different outcome.  If believe it wouldn't you are either a liar or an idiot.
 
2013-07-14 08:26:31 PM

Treygreen13: I can feel the butthurt through the monitor. You were wrong during the entire Zimmerman trial and you're wrong here.


Because...reasons, yea, that's the ticket!
 
2013-07-14 08:26:51 PM

amiable: This ruling has basically given the greenlight to every yahoo in Florida to shoot someone in private and claim they "were in fear for their life."  Protip:   I would not try that while being black.


You probably could, you had just better be shooting another black person.

Focusing on GZ's race was a waste of time. This is more about the legal system's perception of the worth of the victims of violent crime relative to their race and sex than the actual perpetrator. Without bothering with unnecessary details, white children of either sex are held at a premium. We will move heaven and hell to make sure they are avenged. Black men (and, in the eyes of society at least, black males over the age of 14 are considered men) are on the other end of the spectrum. Their chances of justice are farked unless maybe--maybe--another black male killed you.

/Oh, and if you're the victim of a hot enough woman, it doesn't matter who you are: you're out of luck.
 
2013-07-14 08:26:59 PM

Whiskey Pete: George Zimmerman: Noble champion of ineffectual losers everywhere!


Dr Zoidberg has a prescription for you.

i.imgur.com
 
2013-07-14 08:27:02 PM

tenpoundsofcheese: amiable: Carth:

32 states have stand your ground laws with terms similar to Florida.

This isn't stand-your-ground laws, this has to do with burden of proof for self-defense charges.

you are digging in on this, huh?
you still don't know what an affirmative defense is with respect to burden of proof.
you are watching too much MSNBC.


Really, why don't you enlighten us as to where you think the burden of proof falls on an affirmative defense? I will enjoy mocking your ignorance to the whole community.
 
2013-07-14 08:29:41 PM

amiable: Really, why don't you enlighten us as to where you think the burden of proof falls on an affirmative defense? I will enjoy mocking your ignorance to the whole community.


Yeah he's impervious to that.
 
2013-07-14 08:30:31 PM

Elegy: Whiskey Pete: George Zimmerman: Noble champion of ineffectual losers everywhere!

Dr Zoidberg has a prescription for you.

[i.imgur.com image 300x283]


Here's one now!
 
2013-07-14 08:31:30 PM

quiotu: You can imagine with all your heart, and wish on the wishing tree, and clap your hands if you believe... but it won't change the verdict, and it won't change that all the evidence points to you just being really really dumb.


When did I say I was trying to change the verdict? You don't have all of the facts when it comes to my intellect, you're underestimating someone who is smarter than you.

tenpoundsofcheese: You have no idea where his hands were at any given point.


Um, I am certain that at some point his right hand pulled his pistol from its' holster. Wait, do I need evidence to "prove" that too?
 
2013-07-14 08:31:55 PM
Here let me help you out:

True or false: Because an affirmative defense requires an assertion of fact beyond those claimed by the plaintiff, generally the party who offers an affirmative defense bears the burden of proof.
 
2013-07-14 08:31:56 PM

Sagus: Zimmerman will make a bundle suing the media for altering the 911 call, to make it sound like he was a racist and for altering photograph showing less blood/ wounds on his head. Doe's he have a case for suing the prosecutor for with holding evidence?
Here's a lil' salt for those wounds on the team trayvon. He's expected to get his pistol back from the police, but he could lose his CCW


I knew about the 911 call, don't remember them altering a pic. If so, then damn. I hope Zimmerman sues the shiat out of them.
 
2013-07-14 08:32:31 PM
Was playing an online massive multiplayer game last night when I happened to look up at the chat box and lo and behold what did I see? It was a gamer with the name tag of Zimmerman saying "Been a long night, Love ya Treyvone.. night all!" Wasnt expecting that, almost cost me a new keyboard.
 
2013-07-14 08:32:45 PM

flondrix: DoomPaul: He can walk in public and while people may not like him, they cannot legally attack him.

Sure they can.  They can even chase him down before using lethal force in "self defense", and they'll be acquitted.


I'd hate to see GZ have to kill *another* person in self defense.
 
2013-07-14 08:33:40 PM
If someone chases him and he fights back, they can kill him.

In Floriduh, anyway.
 
2013-07-14 08:33:48 PM

tenpoundsofcheese: Owangotang: Popcorn Johnny: Owangotang: Funny how all you do is stir the pot with asinine ramblings and cannot even see the hypocrisy in choosing to respond to me with a picture of one person hitting another in the face. Think real hard about why that makes you an idiot.

I've tried a thousand times to discuss the facts with members of Team Trayvon. People such as yourself refuse to ignore the evidence in the case and continue making preposterous assumptions, most that are directly contradicted by the evidence. A silly picture is all the recognition you deserve.

And yet I have stated throughout that legally Zimmerman was not guilty. That does not stop me from believing he did it and that while legal justice was served moral justice was not. Nothing I have stated was contradicted by any hard evidence. If you choose to believe Zimmerman's every word go ahead, but you're believing someone who lied about how much money he had for his legal defense, and you are believing someone who took his story to a right-wing mouthpiece in a calculated move.

I refuse to believe someone who keeps lying about what George said about his financial situation.
Bye bye!


http://gawker.com/5915713/george-zimmermans-lawyer-admits-his-client -l ied-about-his-finances

Hey look, it's almost like you are willfully choosing to distort the truth in favor of Zimmerman! Naw, I am sure that's not it...
 
2013-07-14 08:35:33 PM

tenpoundsofcheese: amiable: This ruling has basically given the greenlight to every yahoo in Florida to shoot someone in private and claim they "were in fear for their life." Protip: I would not try that while being black.

But you can do this while Hispanic?  I don't get why you think this is a race thing that something that a Hispanic person can do, other people can't.  can you explain that?


Hey, any race can be racist. Black, White, Hispanic, Non-White Hispanic, Native American, Asian or whatever shade you want.

Zimmerman, however, I think was more of a class hater.  He didn't hate a race, but was highly suspicious of poor, thuggish looking guys.
 
2013-07-14 08:38:01 PM

The Great EZE: Focusing on GZ's race was a waste of time. This is more about the legal system's perception of the worth of the victims of violent crime relative to their race and sex than the actual perpetrator. Without bothering with unnecessary details, white children of either sex are held at a premium. We will move heaven and hell to make sure they are avenged. Black men (and, in the eyes of society at least, black males over the age of 14 are considered men) are on the other end of the spectrum. Their chances of justice are farked unless maybe--maybe--another black male killed you.


So now Team Trayvon is going with the racist white jury excuse?
 
2013-07-14 08:39:20 PM

ghare: If someone chases him and he fights back, they can kill him.

In Floriduh, anyway.


You would think that was true, but the law basically says it doesn't matter who started it. If your life is in danger, you can claim self defense. That is the law of self defense. Period the end.

 If Trayvon had won the fight he could have claimed that Zimmerman was going for the gun, and had no choice but to kill George..
 
2013-07-14 08:39:22 PM
A lot more than just George Zimmerman was on trial here. Also on trial was the right of ordinary citizens to proactively take an interest in community affairs. Also on trial was the right of less athletic people to be secure via the second Amendment in furtherance of the first point. Also on trial was equality of white people everywhere to be equally as involved in keeping their streets clean. Would the outcome have been the same, had George Zimmerman been black? I doubt it very much. Martin's attitude toward Zimmerman would have been different, as would his reaction to Zimmerman wanting to know what he was doing slinking through back yards, had Zimmerman been black. It's really a shame that this whole thing came down to race. It shouldn't have been really, but when all you've got is a hammer...
 
2013-07-14 08:40:21 PM

Whiskey Pete: Elegy: Whiskey Pete: George Zimmerman: Noble champion of ineffectual losers everywhere!

Dr Zoidberg has a prescription for you.

[i.imgur.com image 300x283]

Here's one now!


i.imgur.com
 
2013-07-14 08:41:45 PM
Owangotang: http://gawker.com/5915713/george-zimmermans-lawyer-admits-his-client -l ied-about-his-finances

Hey look, it's almost like you are willfully choosing to distort the truth in favor of Zimmerman! Naw, I am sure that's not it...


The statute of limitations for that little but of conspiracy of perjury hasn't expired yet. Regardless, Georgy isn't going anywhere until he can get the old lady freed up for travel.
 
2013-07-14 08:42:15 PM

Popcorn Johnny: The Great EZE: Focusing on GZ's race was a waste of time. This is more about the legal system's perception of the worth of the victims of violent crime relative to their race and sex than the actual perpetrator. Without bothering with unnecessary details, white children of either sex are held at a premium. We will move heaven and hell to make sure they are avenged. Black men (and, in the eyes of society at least, black males over the age of 14 are considered men) are on the other end of the spectrum. Their chances of justice are farked unless maybe--maybe--another black male killed you.

So now Team Trayvon is going with the racist white jury excuse?


Reading is hard, I know. But do a Ctrl+F in my post for "jury."

This isn't exactly a new thing. I thought it was obvious the first time the character the guy too dead to defend himself was used as a defense for the guy who killed him.
 
2013-07-14 08:42:27 PM
Popcorn Johnny:

So now Team Trayvon is going with the racist white jury excuse?

Nah, most of us seem to think that the fact you can escalate a situation and get away with it sucks.  But apparently that's the way the law works, and as a Trayvon supporter, we have to accept the Jury's decision which was based on the law.

Now we need to change the law and understanding of Self Defense.
 
2013-07-14 08:44:09 PM

Taylor Mental: Owangotang: http://gawker.com/5915713/george-zimmermans-lawyer-admits-his-client -l ied-about-his-finances

Hey look, it's almost like you are willfully choosing to distort the truth in favor of Zimmerman! Naw, I am sure that's not it...

The statute of limitations for that little but of conspiracy of perjury hasn't expired yet. Regardless, Georgy isn't going anywhere until he can get the old lady freed up for travel.


The race-baiters who sided with Zimmerman for lulz would have a shiatfit if Zimmerman was charged with perjury.
 
2013-07-14 08:46:10 PM

The Great EZE: Reading is hard, I know. But do a Ctrl+F in my post for "jury."


Well then who are you accusing? Considering your rant about the race affecting the chance for justice in this case, who are you accusing of being racist?
 
2013-07-14 08:47:19 PM

amiable: Here let me help you out:

True or false: Because an affirmative defense requires an assertion of fact beyond those claimed by the plaintiff, generally the party who offers an affirmative defense bears the b

urden of proof.[6] The standard of proof is typically lower than beyond a reasonable doubt. It can either be proved by clear and convincing evidence or by a preponderance of the evidence.

Amended that for you.  Almost clever of you to copy from the wiki as if those were your words.  Almost, but not quite there.

amiable: I'm saying if a black dude stalked and killed a white (or hispanic) kid in a neighborhood where they lived because he "looked suspicious" and then claimed self-defense after he was found over the body with the gun the situation would have had a very different outcome.  If believe it wouldn't you are either a liar or an idiot.


If Zimm were black, maybe the outcome would have been different, but it shouldn't be if we want a fair society with as many rights to each and everyone of us to not be limited and restricted.

That's the mistake you are making, you're trying to equalize the law to limit the non-black man to where the prejudice of society at large sometimes holds the black man at.

We others, want to have the prejudice go away, and retain the right for all to defend themselves as needed, as well as the right to bear arms, etc.
 
2013-07-14 08:48:16 PM
Holy ignore list, Batman. Only 5-6 posts per page aren't grayed out. The derp is out in full force today :(

Unfortunately, for the most part, no way to tell who's trolling and  who actually believes this nonsense
 
2013-07-14 08:49:28 PM

TheSup3rN0va: Holy ignore list, Batman. Only 5-6 posts per page aren't grayed out. The derp is out in full force today :(

Unfortunately, for the most part, no way to tell who's trolling and  who actually believes this nonsense


Bah......you have to be here at 2:00 AM when things get really unhinged.
 
2013-07-14 08:50:08 PM

Owangotang: Assault and battery are not crimes punishable by death in the U.S....well, at least they weren't. It has nothing to do with ITG syndrome and everything to do with irresponsible handling of a deadly weapon. He did not have to shoot Trayvon in the chest, he chose to.


Please explain to us your belief that civilians are legally obligated to suffer injury from unprovoked physical attacks, and that use of force to stop an unprovoked attack is irresponsible. Please explain also why you are incapable of recognizing that personal defense against an in-progress attack is not logically equivalent to a punishment meted out by a court of law after the occurrence of the crime and following due process.
 
2013-07-14 08:52:57 PM

omeganuepsilon: amiable: Here let me help you out:

True or false: Because an affirmative defense requires an assertion of fact beyond those claimed by the plaintiff, generally the party who offers an affirmative defense bears the burden of proof.[6] The standard of proof is typically lower than beyond a reasonable doubt. It can either be proved by clear and convincing evidence or by a preponderance of the evidence.

Amended that for you.  Almost clever of you to copy from the wiki as if those were your words.  Almost, but not quite there.


I never claimed they were my words.  Is that statement true or false?
 
2013-07-14 08:53:28 PM

Popcorn Johnny: The Great EZE: Reading is hard, I know. But do a Ctrl+F in my post for "jury."

Well then who are you accusing? Considering your rant about the race affecting the chance for justice in this case, who are you accusing of being racist?


That's just the way it is, has been since the founding of America. Are you denying that the lives of black men aren't traditionally held at a lower perceived value relative to other people in the country?
 
2013-07-14 08:54:20 PM

Owangotang: Taylor Mental: Owangotang: http://gawker.com/5915713/george-zimmermans-lawyer-admits-his-client -l ied-about-his-finances

Hey look, it's almost like you are willfully choosing to distort the truth in favor of Zimmerman! Naw, I am sure that's not it...

The statute of limitations for that little but of conspiracy of perjury hasn't expired yet. Regardless, Georgy isn't going anywhere until he can get the old lady freed up for travel.

The race-baiters racists and gun nuts who sided with Zimmerman for lulz would have another shiatfit if Zimmerman was charged with perjury.


As hopelessly anal retentive stiffs perhaps they're just in need of a simple homeopathic cure?
 
2013-07-14 08:54:35 PM

Red Shirt Blues: TheSup3rN0va: Holy ignore list, Batman. Only 5-6 posts per page aren't grayed out. The derp is out in full force today :(

Unfortunately, for the most part, no way to tell who's trolling and  who actually believes this nonsense

Bah......you have to be here at 2:00 AM when things get really unhinged.


I had a lot of fun last night when Oakland was raging against the McDonalds flag at 2am.
 
2013-07-14 08:56:07 PM
Also, if you want citation for affirmative defense here are a few, I'm sure you can google some more:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/affirmative_defense

http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=2363">http://diction ary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=2363

http://alcoholpolicy.niaaa.nih.gov/affirmative_defense_2.html

But since you know I'm correct on the facts you have to whine about the citation..
 
2013-07-14 08:56:51 PM

Red Shirt Blues: TheSup3rN0va: Holy ignore list, Batman. Only 5-6 posts per page aren't grayed out. The derp is out in full force today :(

Unfortunately, for the most part, no way to tell who's trolling and  who actually believes this nonsense

Bah......you have to be here at 2:00 AM when things get really unhinged.


I'm really bummed I missed the reading of the verdict and the in-the-moment excitement. I listened to almost every second of the trial, and participated in all the threads, and the damn jury came back while I was go-karting :(

Has anyone seen DroX?Hopefully he didn't "smh" too hard....that could cause (more) brain damage
 
2013-07-14 08:57:02 PM
heres some logic for all of you

you have a daughter.. she has racy.. some may say slutty.. pictures of herself on her phone. she gets raped.. in the trial the defense of the rapist uses the pictures on her phone to cite she had been a whorish slut and therefore the rapist committed no crime.

how is that any different then the precedent set by the more red colored neck members of the fark crowd who think pictures of a teenager emulating the people society gives them as role models.. is justification for their death at the hands of a pathetic fat wanna be cop.

both sides of this argument are pretty damn pathetic in their rhetoric, but those who are trying to turn this into justification to shoot an unarmed teen who you think looks dangerous to you... i hope karma comes and rapes your daughters or your mothers , or better yet bends you over and ass rapes you and justifies it by pointing out fark posts you've made that clearly prove your an attention seeking whore who deserves the ass raping.
 
2013-07-14 08:59:31 PM

dapharmer: heres some logic for all of you

you have a daughter.. she has racy.. some may say slutty.. pictures of herself on her phone. she gets raped.. in the trial the defense of the rapist uses the pictures on her phone to cite she had been a whorish slut and therefore the rapist committed no crime.

how is that any different then the precedent set by the more red colored neck members of the fark crowd who think pictures of a teenager emulating the people society gives them as role models.. is justification for their death at the hands of a pathetic fat wanna be cop.

both sides of this argument are pretty damn pathetic in their rhetoric, but those who are trying to turn this into justification to shoot an unarmed teen who you think looks dangerous to you... i hope karma comes and rapes your daughters or your mothers , or better yet bends you over and ass rapes you and justifies it by pointing out fark posts you've made that clearly prove your an attention seeking whore who deserves the ass raping.


Since you're either trolling or you are dumb enough to actually believe this, in which case you couldn't process a coherent response, I'll just say that if I had a daughter who kept racy pictures of herself on her phone, she wouldn't have a phone (and I would be questioning my parenting up to that point)
 
2013-07-14 09:00:34 PM

The Great EZE: Popcorn Johnny: The Great EZE: Focusing on GZ's race was a waste of time. This is more about the legal system's perception of the worth of the victims of violent crime relative to their race and sex than the actual perpetrator. Without bothering with unnecessary details, white children of either sex are held at a premium. We will move heaven and hell to make sure they are avenged. Black men (and, in the eyes of society at least, black males over the age of 14 are considered men) are on the other end of the spectrum. Their chances of justice are farked unless maybe--maybe--another black male killed you.

So now Team Trayvon is going with the racist white jury excuse?

Reading is hard, I know. But do a Ctrl+F in my post for "jury."

This isn't exactly a new thing. I thought it was obvious the first time the character the guy too dead to defend himself was used as a defense for the guy who killed him.


You might want to ask Roderick Scott about that, a black man who was acquitted of manslaughter charges when he shot a 17 year old white teen who attacked him.

Bonus multiplier: the white kid never touched him
C-c-combo: New York case

/funny how that case didn't become a national call of justice, isn't it?
 
2013-07-14 09:02:00 PM

Mr. Breeze: FloydA: Mr. Breeze: rewind2846: FTA: "He's going to be looking over his shoulder the rest of his life," Robert Zimmerman Jr. said during an interview on CNN.

[www.allmystery.de image 600x300]

Should have thought about that before he decided to play judge, jury and executioner.

I didn't know executioners did their job lying on their backs while getting beaten by the convict.


What was Martin convicted of?

See previous post. It's stupid to label GZ as executioner as he was getting his ass handed to him before he shot TM.

What makes you think GZ had the intent to be an executioner, as opposed to committing an act of self defense?


Hmm.. See my posts in this thread.  I didn't accuse Zimmerman of having any "intent" to do anything.  Your question is irrelevant since I made no such claim.  Zimmerman killed Martin, I think all of us should be able to agree on that.  We agree on that point.

Now tell me, what crime was Martin convicted of?

You described him as a "convict," so let's all get on the same page.  What crime was Martin convicted of?

We might disagree about whether that crime warrants a death sentence, and we might debate about whether Zimmerman was authorized to carry out that sentence.  We can debate those issues later.  First, I need you to clarify your earlier claim that Martin was a "convict."  Of what crime was Martin convicted?
 
2013-07-14 09:02:28 PM

The Great EZE: That's just the way it is, has been since the founding of America. Are you denying that the lives of black men aren't traditionally held at a lower perceived value relative to other people in the country?


What's the way it is? This incident made it's way through the legal system and the jury made a decision. Either you can point out racial bias along the way, or you have to be accusing the jury of making a ruling based on race.
 
2013-07-14 09:03:09 PM

dapharmer: heres some logic for all of you

you have a daughter.. she has racy.. some may say slutty.. pictures of herself on her phone. she gets raped.. in the trial the defense of the rapist uses the pictures on her phone to cite she had been a whorish slut and therefore the rapist committed no crime.

how is that any different then the precedent set by the more red colored neck members of the fark crowd who think pictures of a teenager emulating the people society gives them as role models.. is justification for their death at the hands of a pathetic fat wanna be cop.

both sides of this argument are pretty damn pathetic in their rhetoric, but those who are trying to turn this into justification to shoot an unarmed teen who you think looks dangerous to you... i hope karma comes and rapes your daughters or your mothers , or better yet bends you over and ass rapes you and justifies it by pointing out fark posts you've made that clearly prove your an attention seeking whore who deserves the ass raping.


You've been on FARK a little too long to make such a stupid post.  I suspect you're trolling.

And if you're not trolling, your silly comments (in which you're justifying violence) makes you no better than those you are condemning.
 
2013-07-14 09:03:50 PM

TheSup3rN0va: Red Shirt Blues: TheSup3rN0va: Holy ignore list, Batman. Only 5-6 posts per page aren't grayed out. The derp is out in full force today :(

Unfortunately, for the most part, no way to tell who's trolling and  who actually believes this nonsense

Bah......you have to be here at 2:00 AM when things get really unhinged.

I'm really bummed I missed the reading of the verdict and the in-the-moment excitement. I listened to almost every second of the trial, and participated in all the threads, and the damn jury came back while I was go-karting :(

Has anyone seen DroX?Hopefully he didn't "smh" too hard....that could cause (more) brain damage


Not since the  verdict. He's either banned from Fark for his comments, or crying in his room.
 
2013-07-14 09:04:49 PM

dapharmer: heres some logic for all of you

you have a daughter.. she has racy.. some may say slutty.. pictures of herself on her phone. she gets raped.. in the trial the defense of the rapist uses the pictures on her phone to cite she had been a whorish slut and therefore the rapist committed no crime.

how is that any different then the precedent set by the more red colored neck members of the fark crowd who think pictures of a teenager emulating the people society gives them as role models.. is justification for their death at the hands of a pathetic fat wanna be cop.

both sides of this argument are pretty damn pathetic in their rhetoric, but those who are trying to turn this into justification to shoot an unarmed teen who you think looks dangerous to you... i hope karma comes and rapes your daughters or your mothers , or better yet bends you over and ass rapes you and justifies it by pointing out fark posts you've made that clearly prove your an attention seeking whore who deserves the ass raping.


This is the kind of post that should gets someone a ban.
 
2013-07-14 09:05:33 PM

MelGoesOnTour: dapharmer: heres some logic for all of you

you have a daughter.. she has racy.. some may say slutty.. pictures of herself on her phone. she gets raped.. in the trial the defense of the rapist uses the pictures on her phone to cite she had been a whorish slut and therefore the rapist committed no crime.

how is that any different then the precedent set by the more red colored neck members of the fark crowd who think pictures of a teenager emulating the people society gives them as role models.. is justification for their death at the hands of a pathetic fat wanna be cop.

both sides of this argument are pretty damn pathetic in their rhetoric, but those who are trying to turn this into justification to shoot an unarmed teen who you think looks dangerous to you... i hope karma comes and rapes your daughters or your mothers , or better yet bends you over and ass rapes you and justifies it by pointing out fark posts you've made that clearly prove your an attention seeking whore who deserves the ass raping.

You've been on FARK a little too long to make such a stupid post.  I suspect you're trolling.

And if you're not trolling, your silly comments (in which you're justifying violence) makes you no better than those you are condemning.


I'm just using the same logic as all the other mother farkers on this site saying zimmerman was justified..
 
2013-07-14 09:09:04 PM

dapharmer: MelGoesOnTour: dapharmer: heres some logic for all of you

you have a daughter.. she has racy.. some may say slutty.. pictures of herself on her phone. she gets raped.. in the trial the defense of the rapist uses the pictures on her phone to cite she had been a whorish slut and therefore the rapist committed no crime.

how is that any different then the precedent set by the more red colored neck members of the fark crowd who think pictures of a teenager emulating the people society gives them as role models.. is justification for their death at the hands of a pathetic fat wanna be cop.

both sides of this argument are pretty damn pathetic in their rhetoric, but those who are trying to turn this into justification to shoot an unarmed teen who you think looks dangerous to you... i hope karma comes and rapes your daughters or your mothers , or better yet bends you over and ass rapes you and justifies it by pointing out fark posts you've made that clearly prove your an attention seeking whore who deserves the ass raping.

You've been on FARK a little too long to make such a stupid post.  I suspect you're trolling.

And if you're not trolling, your silly comments (in which you're justifying violence) makes you no better than those you are condemning.

I'm just using the same logic as all the other mother farkers on this site saying zimmerman was justified..


In other words, yep. just stupid
 
2013-07-14 09:10:08 PM
Elegy:

You might want to ask Roderick Scott about that, a black man who was acquitted of manslaughter charges when he shot a 17 year old white teen who attacked him.

Bonus multiplier: the white kid never touched him
C-c-combo: New York case

/funny how that case didn't become a national call of justice, isn't it?


Because the Roderick Scott case was an entirely different set of circumstances where the white kid in question was on his property breaking into his car at the time (he didn't chase him anywhere or stalk him he just walked outside and told them to leave).  Several eye-witnesses corroborated Roderick Scott's story/self-defense claim and even still he was arrested immediately and almost went to jail.  Yeah, that sounds totally analogous!!!
 
2013-07-14 09:10:44 PM
phygz:

In other words, yep. just stupid

yup...exactly
 
Displayed 50 of 824 comments

First | « | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report