If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(PJ Media)   The U.S. Department of Justice helped organize Trayvon Martin protests, which is a totally unbiased and proper activity for the federal government   (pjmedia.com) divider line 247
    More: Unlikely, U.S. Department of Justice, Judicial Watch, PJM, media blackout, technical assistance, Attorney General Eric Holder, neighborhood watch, Seminole County  
•       •       •

2099 clicks; posted to Politics » on 10 Jul 2013 at 4:12 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



247 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-07-10 05:58:07 PM
If Zimmerman felt Martin would put his life in danger with his bare hands, why the fark would he follow him to try to cause a confrontation?
 
2013-07-10 05:59:38 PM

BojanglesPaladin: Corvus: Do you think if a 17 year old throws a punch at you you should be allowed to shoot them dead?

Doesn't everyone?


Umm no. Most people I know I don't think think we should shoot kids if they swing at you.

If you have a 17yo kid can I confront him until he throws a punch then shoot him dead?
 
2013-07-10 05:59:42 PM

Somacandra: Dusk-You-n-Me: 1. Guns
2. Race

You couldn't grow that GOP meat any redder.

[i.imgur.com image 568x346]

O'RLY?

What if Zimmerman was using a Gay Panic defense that Trayvon was trying to seduce him?

Oh yeah. This could get redder. Thankfully its not.


The defense did try and float  "Martin was addicted to reefer!"
 
2013-07-10 06:01:23 PM

Corvus: If Zimmerman felt Martin would put his life in danger with his bare hands, why the fark would he follow him to try to cause a confrontation?

 
Because he had a gun.  Same reason every asshat who shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a gun does the douche-bag things they do.  This is why the bar should be raised for concealed carry to exclude cop-wannabes and other public nuisances.
 
2013-07-10 06:01:35 PM

whidbey: ivan: Pojama people.

God I can't believe I had to actually Google that one. :\

That album kind of went over my head compared to others. Still, apparently.


I thought it was his most accessible, at least at that time. Maybe you're too discerning.

Anyway, every time I see that damn logo I get this earworm, so I thought I'd share.
 
2013-07-10 06:08:26 PM

SixOfDLoC: Corvus:
Zimmerman was forcing an altercation, Martin MAYBE punched him because of it (if you believe someone still talks on their phone when they hide in bushes to punch someone and punches them still holding the phone). This is what the DEFENSE is saying.

Yes, but he was forcing an altercation with a black male, and they don't have any right to stand their ground and defend themselves against creepy weirdos who stalk them as they walk home from the store, certainly no right to defend themselves against some creepy weirdo who GETS OUT OF HIS VEHICLE AND CHASES THEM, because minorities are all on double-secret probation.    But don't you dare call people who think this way "racist", or you're the real racist.

This case is conserviot jack-off fodder because they all fantasize about getting to shoot them some attractive and successful african americans.  If Martin had been a white teenager, the current members of the Zimmerman fan club would all be howling for Zimmerman's blood and demanding that he be "sent back to Mexico in a bag".  (Yes, I know he's not from Mexico)


Another poor soul burned by the farking censors.

This case is not conservative "jack-off fodder". You're over deflecting. This case actually removes any doubt that Martin's ilk fail to understand that we live in a constitutional republic, not some third world sh*t hole like Zimbabwe or colonial America. It's a Shakespearean irony that Florida law enforcement have to plan to prevent black mobs from lynching Zimmerman, all the while screaming about civil rights.

If Martin had been a white teenager, as you premise, then the evidence presented thus far would lead a reasonable jury to believe that Martin was probably an a*shole. Zimmerman would walk and the white community would yawn.
 
2013-07-10 06:09:38 PM

MJMaloney187: This case is not conservative "jack-off fodder". You're over deflecting. This case actually removes any doubt that Martin's ilk fail to understand that we live in a constitutional republic, not some third world sh*t hole like Zimbabwe or colonial America. It's a Shakespearean irony that Florida law enforcement have to plan to prevent black mobs from lynching Zimmerman, all the while screaming about civil rights.


Wow dude you sure can talk some shiat. I got a dang headache.
 
2013-07-10 06:12:17 PM

Philip Francis Queeg: danwinkler: Came to see partisan shills defending their puppetmaster against anything. I am not disappointed. However, i expected something like a quarter of you to have some intellectual honesty and some sort of a conscience. You let me down there, state worshippers.

Pleas explain exactly what you think Obama did wrong in this instance.


Its his justice department. When the bush DoJ did messed up shiat, you guys held Bush accountable, and rightfully so. For obama, its like only things he plans, pays for out of pocket, and executes with his own two hands can ever be his fault. Just hold him to the same standards as presidents past. You know, when the buck stopped at the top.
 
2013-07-10 06:13:51 PM

danwinkler: Philip Francis Queeg: danwinkler: Came to see partisan shills defending their puppetmaster against anything. I am not disappointed. However, i expected something like a quarter of you to have some intellectual honesty and some sort of a conscience. You let me down there, state worshippers.

Pleas explain exactly what you think Obama did wrong in this instance.

Its his justice department. When the bush DoJ did messed up shiat, you guys held Bush accountable, and rightfully so. For obama, its like only things he plans, pays for out of pocket, and executes with his own two hands can ever be his fault. Just hold him to the same standards as presidents past. You know, when the buck stopped at the top.


What exactly do you believe the Department of Justice did wrong in this instance?
 
2013-07-10 06:13:52 PM

Corvus: If Zimmerman felt Martin would put his life in danger with his bare hands, why the fark would he follow him to try to cause a confrontation?


Is there a different State v Zimmerman trial going on somewhere?
 
2013-07-10 06:14:27 PM

whidbey: Whiskey Pete: Zimmerman will die from clogged arteries before the verdict is read by the looks of him.

If he does walk, I gotta wonder if someone's going to try and take him out.


My guess is the Colonel will get him before anyone else does.
 
2013-07-10 06:23:01 PM

MJMaloney187: If Martin had been a white teenager, as you premise, then the evidence presented thus far would lead a reasonable jury to believe that Martin was probably an a*shole. Zimmerman would walk and the white community would yawn.


Oh, please. If Martin had been a white kid, Zimmerman never would have followed him in the first place.
 
2013-07-10 06:24:02 PM

Mike Chewbacca: MJMaloney187: If Martin had been a white teenager, as you premise, then the evidence presented thus far would lead a reasonable jury to believe that Martin was probably an a*shole. Zimmerman would walk and the white community would yawn.

Oh, please. If Martin had been a white kid, Zimmerman never would have followed him in the first place.


CAREFUL you are about to be accused to posting "gibberish" (derp) there....
 
2013-07-10 06:24:09 PM
Do you suppose the author possesses the self awareness to know what a liar he is?
 
2013-07-10 06:26:13 PM

The Larch: Do you suppose the author possesses the self awareness to know what a liar he is?


No. Look at his bio at the bottom of the page.
 
2013-07-10 06:28:57 PM

Philip Francis Queeg: danwinkler: Philip Francis Queeg: danwinkler: Came to see partisan shills defending their puppetmaster against anything. I am not disappointed. However, i expected something like a quarter of you to have some intellectual honesty and some sort of a conscience. You let me down there, state worshippers.

Pleas explain exactly what you think Obama did wrong in this instance.

Its his justice department. When the bush DoJ did messed up shiat, you guys held Bush accountable, and rightfully so. For obama, its like only things he plans, pays for out of pocket, and executes with his own two hands can ever be his fault. Just hold him to the same standards as presidents past. You know, when the buck stopped at the top.

What exactly do you believe the Department of Justice did wrong in this instance?


Really? Is that a serious question? First of all, this nonsense program shouldn't even exist. But thats not obamas fault. However, the DoJ used taxpayer dollars, and used it to fund justice for trayvon rallies... you dont think the DoJ should remain neutral? Especially in such a racially charged case? Instead, they added fuel to the fire. Lets pretend a white man was killed by a black man in self defense. There would be no marches. Nobody would care. I would say dude got what he deserved. Lets play pretend though. Lets say george w bush's DoJ went there, gave a bunch of taxpayer dollars to groups who exist solely to advance white people, and got a bunch of "justice for billy-bob" rallies going. Are you going to sit there and tell me that would fly?
 
2013-07-10 06:32:05 PM

Isitoveryet: jehovahs witness protection: There WILL be riots when GZ is found not guilty. Mark my words.

are you a wizard?


www.i-mockery.com
 
2013-07-10 06:33:22 PM

SixOfDLoC: whidbey: Whiskey Pete: Zimmerman will die from clogged arteries before the verdict is read by the looks of him.

If he does walk, I gotta wonder if someone's going to try and take him out.

When  they do, I hope they invoke "Stand Your Ground".  Shouldn't be too hard to demonstrate that they were in fear for their lives - Zimmerman's killed once already.


Don't worry, people will be coming from all around for a chance to "stand their ground" against Zimmerman, and others will be coming to Florida hoping to get a chance to "stand their ground" against the people standing their ground against Zimmerman, etc., until no one is left standing.
 
2013-07-10 06:34:17 PM

danwinkler: Philip Francis Queeg: danwinkler: Philip Francis Queeg: danwinkler: Came to see partisan shills defending their puppetmaster against anything. I am not disappointed. However, i expected something like a quarter of you to have some intellectual honesty and some sort of a conscience. You let me down there, state worshippers.

Pleas explain exactly what you think Obama did wrong in this instance.

Its his justice department. When the bush DoJ did messed up shiat, you guys held Bush accountable, and rightfully so. For obama, its like only things he plans, pays for out of pocket, and executes with his own two hands can ever be his fault. Just hold him to the same standards as presidents past. You know, when the buck stopped at the top.

What exactly do you believe the Department of Justice did wrong in this instance?

Really? Is that a serious question? First of all, this nonsense program shouldn't even exist. But thats not obamas fault. However, the DoJ used taxpayer dollars, and used it to fund justice for trayvon rallies... you dont think the DoJ should remain neutral? Especially in such a racially charged case? Instead, they added fuel to the fire. Lets pretend a white man was killed by a black man in self defense. There would be no marches. Nobody would care. I would say dude got what he deserved. Lets play pretend though. Lets say george w bush's DoJ went there, gave a bunch of taxpayer dollars to groups who exist solely to advance white people, and got a bunch of "justice for billy-bob" rallies going. Are you going to sit there and tell me that would fly?


You are an idiot. They didn't fund any rallies and they exist to act as intermediaries in hot button situations.
 
2013-07-10 06:36:48 PM

danwinkler: Philip Francis Queeg: danwinkler: Philip Francis Queeg: danwinkler: Came to see partisan shills defending their puppetmaster against anything. I am not disappointed. However, i expected something like a quarter of you to have some intellectual honesty and some sort of a conscience. You let me down there, state worshippers.

Pleas explain exactly what you think Obama did wrong in this instance.

Its his justice department. When the bush DoJ did messed up shiat, you guys held Bush accountable, and rightfully so. For obama, its like only things he plans, pays for out of pocket, and executes with his own two hands can ever be his fault. Just hold him to the same standards as presidents past. You know, when the buck stopped at the top.

What exactly do you believe the Department of Justice did wrong in this instance?

Really? Is that a serious question? First of all, this nonsense program shouldn't even exist. But thats not obamas fault. However, the DoJ used taxpayer dollars, and used it to fund justice for trayvon rallies... you dont think the DoJ should remain neutral? Especially in such a racially charged case? Instead, they added fuel to the fire. Lets pretend a white man was killed by a black man in self defense. There would be no marches. Nobody would care. I would say dude got what he deserved. Lets play pretend though. Lets say george w bush's DoJ went there, gave a bunch of taxpayer dollars to groups who exist solely to advance white people, and got a bunch of "justice for billy-bob" rallies going. Are you going to sit there and tell me that would fly?


Ahh so you don't actually understand what the program was or what it did.  They did not fund rallies and they remained neutral. Far from adding fuel to the fire, their entire purpose is to help defuse tense confrontations.

I am sure a rational, level headed individual like yourself will be relieved to find out that nothing improper was actually done.
 
2013-07-10 06:37:59 PM

ongbok: You are an idiot. They didn't fund any rallies and they exist to act as intermediaries in hot button situations.


It's already canon throughout the derpasphere that Obama's DOJ funded 'Justice For Trayvon' rallies. It is forever wingnut fact now.
 
2013-07-10 06:39:35 PM

vernonFL: What the DOJ "peacekeepers" look like

[cdn.breitbart.com image 475x356]

[encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com image 275x183]

[encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com image 266x190]


We get it, they're black. Skeery skeery.
 
2013-07-10 06:43:11 PM

Corvus: halB: Corvus: I don't get why people think Zimmerman gets to defend himself, by shooting someone but Martin isn't allowed to defend himself by punching someone.

And who the fark attacks someone while still trying to talk to on his cell phone? That makes no sense.

I know, I'm shocked - shocked - that Trayvon was able to get in so many hits after being shot.

What the hell are you talking about. I never said that. Wow you people are amazing.

I forget he hid in the bushes planning to jump him WHILE THE ENTIRE TIME STILL TALKING ON HIS PHONE. Because I know when I plan to fight someone I STAY ON THE PHONE TALKING AS I DO IT.


Um...HELLOOOOO....SPEAKERPHONE! That's how I do it anyway.
 
2013-07-10 06:43:35 PM

jehovahs witness protection: There WILL be riots when GZ is found not guilty. Mark my words.


zamolxismd.org

There should be riots when a kid is shot and killed and it's not proven that he did anything to deserve it.
 
2013-07-10 06:46:04 PM

Mike Chewbacca: MJMaloney187: If Martin had been a white teenager, as you premise, then the evidence presented thus far would lead a reasonable jury to believe that Martin was probably an a*shole. Zimmerman would walk and the white community would yawn.

Oh, please. If Martin had been a white kid, Zimmerman never would have followed him in the first place.


Well, let's just say Zimmerman wouldn't have been as compelled to follow a white kid. The trial evidence suggests otherwise, so we can reasonably assume Zimmerman would follow a white kid if no other facts are changed.
 
2013-07-10 06:58:33 PM

MJMaloney187: The trial evidence suggests otherwise, so we can reasonably assume Zimmerman would follow a white kid if no other facts are changed.


Bullshiat. Pretty much all your other posts.

Yeah I went there.
 
2013-07-10 07:05:16 PM
they should be swarming all over chicago and choosing sides.  there's murders there by the hundreds.
 
2013-07-10 07:11:22 PM
Is it possible that PJ Media is some sort of false-front operation, run by lefties, with the intent of convincing folks that conservatives are complete retards who haven't a f*cking clue how their own government works? Honestly, I can't think of another reason for this article's existence.
 
2013-07-10 07:14:31 PM

El_Swino: Is it possible that PJ Media is some sort of false-front operation, run by lefties, with the intent of convincing folks that conservatives are complete retards who haven't a f*cking clue how their own government works? Honestly, I can't think of another reason for this article's existence.


i1162.photobucket.com
 
2013-07-10 07:27:37 PM

Dusk-You-n-Me: Yet more than the conflicting testimony over who screamed for help, more than the question of which man was on top, this case is about a defendant's presumed innocence and a dead man's presumed guilt. Link


This is why "presumed innocence" really doesn't seem like it should fit with this case.
Usually, "presumed innocence" means you presume someone didn't do something until you know they did. We know GZ shot TM, he admits it.
To carry presumption of innocence over to a self-defense plea, means you have to presume a dead person is guilty of attempted murder...

To treat it this way is to write blaming-the-victim into law.
 
2013-07-10 07:35:37 PM

Whiskey Pete: ongbok: You are an idiot. They didn't fund any rallies and they exist to act as intermediaries in hot button situations.

It's already canon throughout the derpasphere that Obama's DOJ funded 'Justice For Trayvon' rallies. It is forever wingnut fact now.


Yup.  It has already been inscribed in the Book of Rush:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/07/10/obama_regime_organized_ tr ayvon_protests
 
2013-07-10 07:46:10 PM

Corvus: I don't get why people think Zimmerman gets to defend himself, by shooting someone but Martin isn't allowed to defend himself by punching someone.

And who the fark attacks someone while still trying to talk to on his cell phone? That makes no sense.


Those Bluetooth headsets can be useful when you need both hands free.

/i keed...
 
2013-07-10 07:50:04 PM

Car_Ramrod: Dusk-You-n-Me: lockers: Seriously, why are the wing nuts so worked up about this?

1. Guns
2. Race

You couldn't grow that GOP meat any redder.

I heard Trayvon was gay and heading towards an abortion palace, right after picking up his government check with his fellow Muslims.


He was on the Devil Weed, too.
 
2013-07-10 07:50:46 PM

Garble: Dusk-You-n-Me: Yet more than the conflicting testimony over who screamed for help, more than the question of which man was on top, this case is about a defendant's presumed innocence and a dead man's presumed guilt. Link

This is why "presumed innocence" really doesn't seem like it should fit with this case.
Usually, "presumed innocence" means you presume someone didn't do something until you know they did. We know GZ shot TM, he admits it.
To carry presumption of innocence over to a self-defense plea, means you have to presume a dead person is guilty of attempted murder...

To treat it this way is to write blaming-the-victim into law.


Luckily the legal system disagrees with you and has hundreds of years of common law behind it.
 
2013-07-10 07:53:20 PM

danwinkler: Philip Francis Queeg: danwinkler: Philip Francis Queeg: danwinkler: Came to see partisan shills defending their puppetmaster against anything. I am not disappointed. However, i expected something like a quarter of you to have some intellectual honesty and some sort of a conscience. You let me down there, state worshippers.

Pleas explain exactly what you think Obama did wrong in this instance.

Its his justice department. When the bush DoJ did messed up shiat, you guys held Bush accountable, and rightfully so. For obama, its like only things he plans, pays for out of pocket, and executes with his own two hands can ever be his fault. Just hold him to the same standards as presidents past. You know, when the buck stopped at the top.

What exactly do you believe the Department of Justice did wrong in this instance?

Really? Is that a serious question? First of all, this nonsense program shouldn't even exist. But thats not obamas fault. However, the DoJ used taxpayer dollars, and used it to fund justice for trayvon rallies... you dont think the DoJ should remain neutral? Especially in such a racially charged case? Instead, they added fuel to the fire. Lets pretend a white man was killed by a black man in self defense. There would be no marches. Nobody would care. I would say dude got what he deserved. Lets play pretend though. Lets say george w bush's DoJ went there, gave a bunch of taxpayer dollars to groups who exist solely to advance white people, and got a bunch of "justice for billy-bob" rallies going. Are you going to sit there and tell me that would fly?


So the Justice Department shouldn't have a program to stop violence before it happens?
Where in the article can you show me that the DOJ funded Justice for Trayvon Rallies?
 
2013-07-10 08:00:10 PM

spongeboob: danwinkler: Philip Francis Queeg: danwinkler: Philip Francis Queeg: danwinkler: Came to see partisan shills defending their puppetmaster against anything. I am not disappointed. However, i expected something like a quarter of you to have some intellectual honesty and some sort of a conscience. You let me down there, state worshippers.

Pleas explain exactly what you think Obama did wrong in this instance.

Its his justice department. When the bush DoJ did messed up shiat, you guys held Bush accountable, and rightfully so. For obama, its like only things he plans, pays for out of pocket, and executes with his own two hands can ever be his fault. Just hold him to the same standards as presidents past. You know, when the buck stopped at the top.

What exactly do you believe the Department of Justice did wrong in this instance?

Really? Is that a serious question? First of all, this nonsense program shouldn't even exist. But thats not obamas fault. However, the DoJ used taxpayer dollars, and used it to fund justice for trayvon rallies... you dont think the DoJ should remain neutral? Especially in such a racially charged case? Instead, they added fuel to the fire. Lets pretend a white man was killed by a black man in self defense. There would be no marches. Nobody would care. I would say dude got what he deserved. Lets play pretend though. Lets say george w bush's DoJ went there, gave a bunch of taxpayer dollars to groups who exist solely to advance white people, and got a bunch of "justice for billy-bob" rallies going. Are you going to sit there and tell me that would fly?

So the Justice Department shouldn't have a program to stop violence before it happens?
Where in the article can you show me that the DOJ funded Justice for Trayvon Rallies?


They never came out and said it because the documents they acquired through the FOIA don't say that, they just insinuated that they did because DOJ employees went to areas where there were rallies happening and spent money. So the mouth breathers will see that DOJ employees, who's job it is is to prevent violence sprouting up in hotspots, went to an area where there was a rally and spent money, and jump to the conclusion that they spent that money funding the rally.
 
2013-07-10 08:24:15 PM

ongbok: They never came out and said it because the documents they acquired through the FOIA don't say that, they just insinuated that they did because DOJ employees went to areas where there were rallies happening and spent money. So the mouth breathers will see that DOJ employees, who's job it is is to prevent violence sprouting up in hotspots, went to an area where there was a rally and spent money, and jump to the conclusion that they spent that money funding the rally.


Not only jump to that conclusion it will be accepted as fact and if you don't agree with it you are of course a blind liberal or a lying liberal.

/probably being a liberal means you are both blind and willful a liar.
 
2013-07-10 08:25:49 PM
It is so nice seeing the Federal Government being run by a Chicago ward boss. I imagine the IRS will now be auditing Zimmerman, totally at random.
 
2013-07-10 08:41:51 PM
Of course if Zimmerman was black and was acquitted there is no way that white people would riot, not sure why rioting before the trial is better though.
 
2013-07-10 08:56:25 PM

Mrbogey: Garble: Dusk-You-n-Me: Yet more than the conflicting testimony over who screamed for help, more than the question of which man was on top, this case is about a defendant's presumed innocence and a dead man's presumed guilt. Link
This is why "presumed innocence" really doesn't seem like it should fit with this case.
Usually, "presumed innocence" means you presume someone didn't do something until you know they did. We know GZ shot TM, he admits it.
To carry presumption of innocence over to a self-defense plea, means you have to presume a dead person is guilty of attempted murder...
To treat it this way is to write blaming-the-victim into law.

Luckily the legal system disagrees with you and has hundreds of years of common law behind it.


Okay. Non-specified, call-to-authority aside, could you explain why I'm wrong in saying that in order to presume GZ's innocence in this case, you have to presume TM's guilt?
Are the dead intrinsically less entitled to presumption of innocence?
 
2013-07-10 08:56:55 PM

Mrbogey: whidbey: Bullshiat. And attacking me personally only shows you have nothing to show for yourself.

I'm making fun of you because you said something dumb. I'm not making fun of you to discredit what you said. That it's in direct conflict with the established facts of the case is enough to discredit you.


Yeah, give it up whidbey, Mrbodey is purely an insult machine. You're not going to get anything out of him that is not an insult to someone or some thing.
 
2013-07-10 08:57:35 PM

spongeboob: Of course if Zimmerman was black and was acquitted there is no way that white people would riot, not sure why rioting before the trial is better though.


Got any links from the last 80 years?
 
2013-07-10 09:01:57 PM

Garble: Mrbogey: Garble: Dusk-You-n-Me: Yet more than the conflicting testimony over who screamed for help, more than the question of which man was on top, this case is about a defendant's presumed innocence and a dead man's presumed guilt. Link
This is why "presumed innocence" really doesn't seem like it should fit with this case.
Usually, "presumed innocence" means you presume someone didn't do something until you know they did. We know GZ shot TM, he admits it.
To carry presumption of innocence over to a self-defense plea, means you have to presume a dead person is guilty of attempted murder...
To treat it this way is to write blaming-the-victim into law.

Luckily the legal system disagrees with you and has hundreds of years of common law behind it.

Okay. Non-specified, call-to-authority aside, could you explain why I'm wrong in saying that in order to presume GZ's innocence in this case, you have to presume TM's guilt?
Are the dead intrinsically less entitled to presumption of innocence?


From the actual zimmerman thread:
The only thing that disproves self defense under Florida law is actual or circumstantial evidence sufficient to say that it could not possibly have happened as Zimmerman has stated.

The prosecution would just have to have any evidence that zimmerman's account of events couldn't have happened. Unfortunately for the state there are eye witnesses,  expert testimony and physical evidence that corroborate parts of Zimmerman's story making his explanation of what happened reasonable.
 
2013-07-10 09:06:20 PM
You've gotta admit Jame O'Keefe's makeup guys are getting better and better. Even the costumes look more authentic.

t0.gstatic.com encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com
 
2013-07-10 09:17:03 PM

Carth: spongeboob: Of course if Zimmerman was black and was acquitted there is no way that white people would riot, not sure why rioting before the trial is better though.

Got any links from the last 80 years?


How long ago was 1986 1982 or 1989
 
2013-07-10 09:29:25 PM

spongeboob: Carth: spongeboob: Of course if Zimmerman was black and was acquitted there is no way that white people would riot, not sure why rioting before the trial is better though.

Got any links from the last 80 years?

How long ago was 1986 1982 or 1989


Much better examples thank you. I think they would better be described as lynch mobs or hate crimes than race riots  but they are better examples than things that happened a few decades before anyone  posting here was alive.
 
2013-07-10 09:33:47 PM
Troll much subby?
 
2013-07-10 09:38:58 PM

Carth: spongeboob: Carth: spongeboob: Of course if Zimmerman was black and was acquitted there is no way that white people would riot, not sure why rioting before the trial is better though.

Got any links from the last 80 years?

How long ago was 1986 1982 or 1989

Much better examples thank you. I think they would better be described as lynch mobs or hate crimes than race riots  but they are better examples than things that happened a few decades before anyone  posting here was alive.


Those are very good examples of hate crimes (maybe). So let me ask you this: What do you think would be justice for the whites who committed these savage hate-motivated crimes?
 
2013-07-10 09:52:15 PM

MJMaloney187: Carth: spongeboob: Carth: spongeboob: Of course if Zimmerman was black and was acquitted there is no way that white people would riot, not sure why rioting before the trial is better though.

Got any links from the last 80 years?

How long ago was 1986 1982 or 1989

Much better examples thank you. I think they would better be described as lynch mobs or hate crimes than race riots  but they are better examples than things that happened a few decades before anyone  posting here was alive.

Those are very good examples of hate crimes (maybe). So let me ask you this: What do you think would be justice for the whites who committed these savage hate-motivated crimes?


Uh, what you just posted wasn't a hate related crime. The investigators that handled the case all said that everything pointed to it being non hate related and a random act of violence.

They didn't carjack and mutilate these people because they were out to kill white people, they did it because they wanted to steal a car and they were some sick farks. this is what the investigation found. That isn't a race related crime. But of course you believe that everybody is lying and covering up the truth, don't you?

The crowd in Bensonhurst beat and killed Yusef Hawkins because he was black and they thought he was dating a white girl in the neighborhood. That is a race related crime.
 
2013-07-10 10:17:44 PM
Now it looks like the whole DOJ site is down.
 
Displayed 50 of 247 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report