If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(NBC News)   Own a Ford F-250? Might want to check if it's still there   (nbcnews.com) divider line 112
    More: Obvious, Ford F-150, Cadillac Escalade, Ford Motor Company, Chevy Tahoe, Audi A4  
•       •       •

12590 clicks; posted to Main » on 09 Jul 2013 at 1:22 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



112 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2013-07-09 01:26:24 PM  
Gas at near $4 a gallon for a long time now, and this still the most popular vehicle among American farkwits.  Unbelievable.
 
2013-07-09 01:28:27 PM  
Well if you own a 250 or larger its probably because you own something like a big boat or horsesbecause they ride like a log wagon when empty.

People buying as a penis compensator get 150s because they are the same external dimensions and ride normally.
 
2013-07-09 01:28:49 PM  
The article says 350 not 250 subtard
 
2013-07-09 01:29:25 PM  

boarch: The article says 350 not 250 subtard


wow i wish i could delete myself
 
2013-07-09 01:31:13 PM  

Fissile: Gas at near $4 a gallon for a long time now, and this still the most popular vehicle among American farkwits.  Unbelievable.


What's the cost of an F250? $40k? more? I doubt it's the cost for people that need to keep an eye for MPG due to cost of gas. Also, I'm betting that those F250s get chopped up and shipped to Mexico or Latin America when those trucks are used offroad.
 
2013-07-09 01:33:15 PM  
I'm surprised the article didn't point out the exploit that makes these things so easy to steal.
 
2013-07-09 01:33:22 PM  
Fissile: Gas at near $4 a gallon for a long time now, and this still the most popular vehicle among American farkwits.  Unbelievable.

You sound like a real fun person to hang out with. Why do Americans buy these big gass guzzlers? Because they can.

/Ram 1500 5.7 hemi ftw - driving over your Prius or Fiat
//A 4x4 truck can climb mountains, go through mud and snow, we rescue people, we are heroes.
 
2013-07-09 01:36:07 PM  

Johnnyflash: A 4x4 truck can climb mountains, go through mud and snow, we rescue people, we are heroes.


Yet a majority of the vehicles I see fly off the road when it snows are trucks...I guess you can call your fellow heroes for help.
 
2013-07-09 01:36:35 PM  
The list is utterly useless without listing the model years being stolen.  For a while there was breathless "you should panic because your new car will be stolen!" articles every year about how the Accord, Civic, and Corolla were huge theft targets but they always ignored that the stolen models were really old ones before immobilizers became standard equipment.

I highly doubt that thieves are hot-wiring 2013 F-250s but I could see an early 90s truck being a target because of  them being all over the place, having old or non-existent anti-theft, and them being heavily used (and abused) as work trucks and thus having a strong used parts demand.  That is supported by the article saying the average theft claim is around $7k.
 
2013-07-09 01:38:02 PM  

Johnnyflash: //A 4x4 truck can climb mountains, go through mud and snow, we rescue people, we are heroes.


So, practically useless in Florida, yet every dipshiat with a "Salt Life" sticker here has one jacked up to the sky.
 
2013-07-09 01:39:43 PM  

Johnnyflash: Fissile: Gas at near $4 a gallon for a long time now, and this still the most popular vehicle among American farkwits.  Unbelievable.

You sound like a real fun person to hang out with. Why do Americans buy these big gass guzzlers? Because they can.

/Ram 1500 5.7 hemi ftw - driving over your Prius or Fiat
//A 4x4 truck can climb mountains, go through mud and snow, we rescue people, we are heroes.


The bar for hero has gotten really low.
 
2013-07-09 01:40:41 PM  

ddam: Fissile: Gas at near $4 a gallon for a long time now, and this still the most popular vehicle among American farkwits.  Unbelievable.

What's the cost of an F250? $40k? more? I doubt it's the cost for people that need to keep an eye for MPG due to cost of gas. Also, I'm betting that those F250s get chopped up and shipped to Mexico or Latin America when those trucks are used offroad.


Loaded up crew cab with a diesel can push $65K if you click on all the option boxes.

Still, most of these are probably being stolen and then stripped for parts that are then resold.
 
2013-07-09 01:40:41 PM  
www.autos.ca

I'm guessing this guy's got no worries.
 
2013-07-09 01:44:54 PM  
In the UK traditional auto theft has all but disappeared. Since proper anti-theft measures are on all cars (and a lot of bikes), you need the key to start it - hot-wiring just won't work.

Thieves instead burgle houses, looking for keys. Burglary has gone through the roof.

Yay for thieves.
 
2013-07-09 01:45:17 PM  
Or it could be that some people hold on to the old idea that a diesel engine should be left running because stopping it and starting it often is bad for the engine and glow plugs etc. Thief sees an unoccupied expensive truck  running and it's smash and grab time.
 
2013-07-09 01:45:35 PM  

Abe Vigoda's Ghost: [www.autos.ca image 850x419]

I'm guessing this guy's got no worries.


It does my heart good to see these things still on the road.
 
2013-07-09 01:46:15 PM  
www.marax.at
2" of snow? BRING IT ON!!
 
2013-07-09 01:49:40 PM  

Fissile: Gas at near $4 a gallon for a long time now, and this still the most popular vehicle among American farkwits.  Unbelievable.


On top of that, most of them don't even have trailer hitches or ever use the bed.
 
2013-07-09 01:50:18 PM  
I wonder what the stats are for a 2000 F-250.  I have a low mileage turbodiesel model that I use about once a month for hauling the trailer and other heavy stuff.   But it lives in a garage the rest of the time so it's not parked outside where visible.

Also for the trolls whining about people buying big trucks - at least in my case I actually use it for what it was intended for, not going to the grocery store.   My daily driver is a 30 MPG Mazda sport wagon.

I love the 7.3L turbodiesel.  Most reliable and powerful diesel engine that ever came with that truck.

-H
 
2013-07-09 01:51:56 PM  
It is a little difficult to move all the bodies in a mini.
 
2013-07-09 01:52:49 PM  

Dr_luckyz: Yet a majority of the vehicles I see fly off the road when it snows are trucks...I guess you can call your fellow heroes for help.


The majority I see off the road are SUVs in my area.  Despite the proportions between cars, SUVs, and trucks being about even, trucks are last for # in the ditch.
 
2013-07-09 01:53:26 PM  

oldfarthenry: [www.marax.at image 453x339]
2" of snow? BRING IT ON!!


No scratches or dents? That truck sees more car washes than trips in the snow/mud.
 
2013-07-09 01:53:55 PM  

Johnnyflash: Fissile: Gas at near $4 a gallon for a long time now, and this still the most popular vehicle among American farkwits.  Unbelievable.

You sound like a real fun person to hang out with. Why do Americans buy these big gass guzzlers? Because they can.

=============


Sure they can, the government continues to spend trillions of dollars on wars to keep the oil supply lines open.  I'm sure you're different, though.   I'm sure you're one of those "self sufficient" real Muricans whose done it all himself.  Ayn Rand told you so.
 
2013-07-09 01:55:33 PM  

DubtodaIll: I'm surprised the article didn't point out the exploit that makes these things so easy to steal.


You're just going to leave us hanging?
 
2013-07-09 01:55:39 PM  
That's what I love about driving a POS truck.

Nobody wants it.
No need to pay collision/comprensive on it.
Nobody messes with it.
No need to fear running it hard or actually "using" it like it was intended.
Easy to fix, cheap parts.
You're not afraid to bang into at-fault drivers with it .
There's an unlimited supply of replacements on Craigslist for three grand.
"New truck" every few years.

A decent POS is 75% of a new truck at 10% of the price.
 
2013-07-09 01:58:46 PM  

Satanic_Hamster: Fissile: Gas at near $4 a gallon for a long time now, and this still the most popular vehicle among American farkwits.  Unbelievable.

On top of that, most of them don't even have trailer hitches or ever use the bed.


==============

Around here, most are used as cowboy Cadillacs, nothing ever goes in the bed.  When I do see a privately registered truck being used to haul something, the cargo is usually motorcycles, jet skis, boats, ATVs, etc
 
2013-07-09 01:59:00 PM  

oldfarthenry: [www.marax.at image 453x339]
2" of snow? BRING IT ON!!


Those are basically these:

images04.olx.com

With a Ford cab and interior, and Cat or Cummins diesels under the hood.  They never came from the factory with a pickup bed, but third party manufacturers jumped in and started making them back in the heady days before the housing collapse when there were plenty of rednecks with HELOCs burning holes in their pockets.

It's a straight up medium duty truck, built on an International frame.  It was part of the tie-up with Navistar that Ford had for a while, the one that also resulted in the absolute worst Ford engine in modern history, the Navistar designed 6.0 liter diesel.
 
2013-07-09 02:01:35 PM  

Fissile: Satanic_Hamster: Fissile: Gas at near $4 a gallon for a long time now, and this still the most popular vehicle among American farkwits.  Unbelievable.

On top of that, most of them don't even have trailer hitches or ever use the bed.

==============

Around here, most are used as cowboy Cadillacs, nothing ever goes in the bed.  When I do see a privately registered truck being used to haul something, the cargo is usually motorcycles, jet skis, boats, ATVs, etc


They're fairly popular with the rich folks who need to haul their toys around, as well as with ranchers and horse people.  I drove up through central FL this weekend along the old highways and more often than not the big trucks I saw had either a horse trailer or a huge boat behind them.
 
2013-07-09 02:02:07 PM  

yanceylebeef: Abe Vigoda's Ghost: [www.autos.ca image 850x419]

I'm guessing this guy's got no worries.

It does my heart good to see these things still on the road.


Amen.  I had an El Camino in high school, circa 1996, and it was, hands-down, the best car I've ever had.  Fast engine and great for the constant relocations of my youth.  I would soooo buy one if they came back.
 
2013-07-09 02:09:00 PM  
oldfarthenry:

www.marax.at


2" of snow penis? BRING IT ON!!
 
2013-07-09 02:16:03 PM  
TuteTibiImperes:
It's a straight up medium duty truck, built on an International frame.  It was part of the tie-up with Navistar that Ford had for a while, the one that also resulted in the absolute worst Ford engine in modern history, the Navistar designed 6.0 liter diesel.

I warned my company about buying a used truck with that 6.0 engine, that it was the most recalled engine in Ford history, but they went with it anyway.   A few weeks later I was driving it and oil smoke just started pouring out the exhaust every time I pressed the pedal.    A few grand (!) later and its back on the road again.

I'm going to make my 7.3L last as long as possible...

-H
 
2013-07-09 02:19:09 PM  

ddam: What's the cost of an F250? $40k? more? I doubt it's the cost for people that need to keep an eye for MPG due to cost of gas.


upload.annoyed.org
American spending 101: Buy more than you can afford in order to make it look like you can buy at that level, thus securing an ample supply of vagina for your small penis (well, at least, in theory).
 
2013-07-09 02:27:19 PM  
I don't get the whole small penis big car thing. That guy next to the big truck looks puny. I look like King Kong coming out of a small car.
 
2013-07-09 02:30:57 PM  

harlock: TuteTibiImperes:
It's a straight up medium duty truck, built on an International frame.  It was part of the tie-up with Navistar that Ford had for a while, the one that also resulted in the absolute worst Ford engine in modern history, the Navistar designed 6.0 liter diesel.

I warned my company about buying a used truck with that 6.0 engine, that it was the most recalled engine in Ford history, but they went with it anyway.   A few weeks later I was driving it and oil smoke just started pouring out the exhaust every time I pressed the pedal.    A few grand (!) later and its back on the road again.

I'm going to make my 7.3L last as long as possible...

-H


The 7.3 is a great engine.  The new 6.7 is also great, and was designed entirely in-house by Ford.  The 6.4, the second generation Navistar engine, was better than the 6.0, but still had some quirks.

The problems with the 6.0 boil down to two things: torque to yield head bolts that could warp or fail under higher than normal combustion/coolant temperature and an EGR system that was prone to clogging which resulted in higher than normal combustion and coolant temperatures.

Interestingly enough the version of the engine used in International trucks wasn't as problematic, but it was also tuned much differently (much lower HP, higher torque at lower RPM more suited for medium duty applications) and wasn't subject to as stringent emission guidelines as the one used in the pickups, so it didn't have the same EGR and regeneration issues.

Navistar developed an engine was was suitable for their needs, and sold it to Ford as being acceptable for a much different working environment.  It was also the first diesel Ford had that was subject to the new and much stricter EPA guidelines for diesel emissions, so there wasn't a lot of experience as to what could go wrong.
 
2013-07-09 02:46:43 PM  
TuteTibiImperes:

The 7.3 is a great engine.  The new 6.7 is also great, and was designed entirely in-house by Ford.  The 6.4, the second generation Navistar engine, was better than the 6.0, but still had some quirks.

The problems with the 6.0 boil down to two things: torque to yield head bolts that could warp or fail under higher than normal combustion/coolant temperature and an EGR system that was prone to clogging which resulted in higher than normal combustion and coolant temperatures.

Interestingly enough the version of the engine used in International trucks wasn't as problematic, but it was also tuned much differently (much lower HP, higher torque at lower RPM more suited for medium duty applications) and wasn't subject to as stringent emission guidelines as the one used in the pickups, so it didn't have the same EGR and regeneration issues.

Navistar developed an engine was was suitable for their needs, and sold it to Ford as being acceptable for a much different working environment.  It was also the first diesel Ford had that was subject to the new and much stricter EPA guidelines for diesel emissions, so there wasn't a lot of experience as to what could go wrong.


Thanks for the background on that, and it's good to hear the 6.7 is an entirely different animal.  One day I'll need to upgrade and hope they continue in that direction.    I bought the 7.3 used from someone who babied it and I got very lucky.   Low mileage, never used as a work truck. Just used it to pull his racing trailers to the track occasionally.

Now I only use it about once a month or so for couple hundred mile round trips each time, so it should continue to last a long time.   It came with a hypertec programmer which gives it awesome power from increased boost and tighter shifting.   No issues have arisen from that though I'd like to get the pillar gauge set so I can have a pyrometer, or least one of the new smartphone apps that interfaces with the ECU.  The engine temp is rock solid but it'd be nice to see what's going on with the turbo.

-H
 
2013-07-09 02:55:19 PM  

harlock: TuteTibiImperes:

The 7.3 is a great engine.  The new 6.7 is also great, and was designed entirely in-house by Ford.  The 6.4, the second generation Navistar engine, was better than the 6.0, but still had some quirks.

The problems with the 6.0 boil down to two things: torque to yield head bolts that could warp or fail under higher than normal combustion/coolant temperature and an EGR system that was prone to clogging which resulted in higher than normal combustion and coolant temperatures.

Interestingly enough the version of the engine used in International trucks wasn't as problematic, but it was also tuned much differently (much lower HP, higher torque at lower RPM more suited for medium duty applications) and wasn't subject to as stringent emission guidelines as the one used in the pickups, so it didn't have the same EGR and regeneration issues.

Navistar developed an engine was was suitable for their needs, and sold it to Ford as being acceptable for a much different working environment.  It was also the first diesel Ford had that was subject to the new and much stricter EPA guidelines for diesel emissions, so there wasn't a lot of experience as to what could go wrong.

Thanks for the background on that, and it's good to hear the 6.7 is an entirely different animal.  One day I'll need to upgrade and hope they continue in that direction.    I bought the 7.3 used from someone who babied it and I got very lucky.   Low mileage, never used as a work truck. Just used it to pull his racing trailers to the track occasionally.

Now I only use it about once a month or so for couple hundred mile round trips each time, so it should continue to last a long time.   It came with a hypertec programmer which gives it awesome power from increased boost and tighter shifting.   No issues have arisen from that though I'd like to get the pillar gauge set so I can have a pyrometer, or least one of the new smartphone apps that interfaces with the ECU.  The engine temp is rock solid b ...


At about 100k - 150k miles, it WILL develop an air leak in the fuel system that will cause knocking (almost like a rod knock, but not as loud)....especially noticeable when the fuel level gets below 1/4 full.  Eventually it will result in the truck running out of fuel, even though the gauge says otherwise. The fuel pickup in the tank cracks and will have to be replaced.  There are several aftermarket companies making retrofit kits for less than half of what a new, stock Ford fuel pickup tube will cost....google "hutch mod".  There is also the "harpoon" mod, which increases the stock fuel tank capacity by about 3-5 gallons (depending on which model you have).
 
2013-07-09 02:56:47 PM  

bopis: I don't get the whole small penis big car thing. That guy next to the big truck looks puny. I look like King Kong coming out of a small car.


I never understood it either.  I see a lot of these same comments in threads about guns as well.  As a guy, who has fired many guns, and driven just about every sized vehicle from the 3 cylinder Chevy sprint to extended cab Ford F350, I've never really been worried or even thought too much about my size.  Sure guns can be a power trip so I guess I can kind of imagine a guy that feels powerless to gravitate to that sort of thing.  But when driving a large truck I just feel like I'm carefully tip toeing around everything.  Driving a tiny high torque car is FAR more of a power trip than any pickup.  Maybe these comments are just projecting their own self concise fear onto people that they dislike.
 
2013-07-09 03:01:14 PM  

MonoChango: bopis: I don't get the whole small penis big car thing. That guy next to the big truck looks puny. I look like King Kong coming out of a small car.

I never understood it either.  I see a lot of these same comments in threads about guns as well.  As a guy, who has fired many guns, and driven just about every sized vehicle from the 3 cylinder Chevy sprint to extended cab Ford F350, I've never really been worried or even thought too much about my size.  Sure guns can be a power trip so I guess I can kind of imagine a guy that feels powerless to gravitate to that sort of thing.  But when driving a large truck I just feel like I'm carefully tip toeing around everything.  Driving a tiny high torque car is FAR more of a power trip than any pickup.  Maybe these comments are just projecting their own self concise fear onto people that they dislike.


Or maybe, just maybe, you have a small penis.

It's a just a joke. 5% of men who drive a large truck actually do have a normal sized penis.
 
2013-07-09 03:03:34 PM  

MonoChango: bopis: I don't get the whole small penis big car thing. That guy next to the big truck looks puny. I look like King Kong coming out of a small car.

I never understood it either.  I see a lot of these same comments in threads about guns as well.  As a guy, who has fired many guns, and driven just about every sized vehicle from the 3 cylinder Chevy sprint to extended cab Ford F350, I've never really been worried or even thought too much about my size.  Sure guns can be a power trip so I guess I can kind of imagine a guy that feels powerless to gravitate to that sort of thing.  But when driving a large truck I just feel like I'm carefully tip toeing around everything.  Driving a tiny high torque car is FAR more of a power trip than any pickup.  Maybe these comments are just projecting their own self concise fear onto people that they dislike.


Fire a 50 cal. and your schwanse lengthens to about a foot/foot and a half. Duh.

I "tool' around in a Mazda 3 tired gobbler.  Looked at price, milage and legroom (6'5" height SUCKS shopping for cars).  Never thought once about using my vehicle to attract the girls.  Maybe having a sense of humor and some charm is all I need, I dunno.
 
2013-07-09 03:10:08 PM  
Bill of materials:

An F-350 with a blown engine (better go with the dually)

Two of these

One of these

Two hundred of these

It would cost like 80 grand, but it sure would be fun until I snapped the rear axle.
 
2013-07-09 03:17:05 PM  
They break down so much that there's a huge demand for parts, hence the high rate of theft.
 
2013-07-09 03:34:43 PM  

Fissile: Gas at near $4 a gallon for a long time now, and this still the most popular vehicle among American farkwits.  Unbelievable.


It really is unbelievable. Constant nagging and disdain from The People Who Know Better Than You and these idiots still buy what they want. Sheesh.
 
2013-07-09 03:37:55 PM  

lunkhed: In the UK traditional auto theft has all but disappeared. Since proper anti-theft measures are on all cars (and a lot of bikes), you need the key to start it - hot-wiring just won't work.

Thieves instead burgle houses, looking for keys. Burglary has gone through the roof.

Yay for thieves.


Isn't the entire country carpeted with security cameras? I would think that all you'd have to do is track the car from the house to the chop shop via video recordings.
 
2013-07-09 03:41:49 PM  

stuffy: It is a little difficult to move all the bodies in a mini.


Stalk more midgets.
 
2013-07-09 03:48:46 PM  

tricycleracer: Johnnyflash: //A 4x4 truck can climb mountains, go through mud and snow, we rescue people, we are heroes.

So, practically useless in Florida, yet every dipshiat with a "Salt Life" sticker here has one jacked up to the sky.


Florida has sand and swamps -- 4x4s are good there, too.
 
2013-07-09 03:49:05 PM  

oldfarthenry: [www.marax.at image 453x339]
2" of snow? BRING IT ON!!


yeah, but that truck ain't heavy-duty, it's only medium-duty.

/no snow blade on it, either
 
2013-07-09 03:49:28 PM  

Hollie Maea: Bill of materials:

An F-350 with a blown engine (better go with the dually)

Two of these

One of these

Two hundred of these

It would cost like 80 grand, but it sure would be fun until I snapped the rear axle.


1.2 Mega Watt (1200kW), 1600HP motor?
Good lord could those be put into passenger vehicles?

What type of HP do you get with the current generation of Teslas or Nissan Leaf?
 
2013-07-09 03:54:43 PM  

CognaciousThunk: oldfarthenry: [www.marax.at image 453x339]
2" of snow? BRING IT ON!!

yeah, but that truck ain't heavy-duty, it's only medium-duty.

/no snow blade on it, either


Just need to swap in the duty module from a Super Duty...instant gains of up to 17% more duty.

//Duty.
 
2013-07-09 03:56:18 PM  

EnronX: Hollie Maea: Bill of materials:

An F-350 with a blown engine (better go with the dually)

Two of these

One of these

Two hundred of these

It would cost like 80 grand, but it sure would be fun until I snapped the rear axle.

1.2 Mega Watt (1200kW), 1600HP motor?
Good lord could those be put into passenger vehicles?

What type of HP do you get with the current generation of Teslas or Nissan Leaf?


allsportcrossfit.com
 
2013-07-09 04:01:51 PM  
Those monster truck drivers are fun to go around with a 1984 Toyota hilux, 22R engine.

Most of those beasts can't get out of their own way off the line.  There are maybe two in my town that can, and we know each other :)
 
2013-07-09 04:06:02 PM  

EnronX: 1.2 Mega Watt (1200kW), 1600HP motor?
Good lord could those be put into passenger vehicles?



Sure!  If you can find one that won't break.

What type of HP do you get with the current generation of Teslas or Nissan Leaf?

Sportiest Tesla Model S: 310kW
Sportiest Tesla Roadster: 215kW
Nissan Leaf: 80kW

A Miata with about 680kW:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_U5cTPC6EwE
 
2013-07-09 04:06:33 PM  
Slight threadjack, but why the hell doesn't Ford make a smaller truck like the Ranger anymore?  I just need enough truck to get me to the dump on weekends and pick up the occasional yard of mulch or dirt.  I have no need or desire to drive a 100" wide truck.

Bought a Tacoma 8 years ago for the famed reliability, which did not turn out to be the case...
 
2013-07-09 04:07:15 PM  

Fissile: Gas at near $4 a gallon for a long time now, and this still the most popular vehicle among American farkwits.  Unbelievable.


I don't get it myself.  But the Big 2.5 and Nissan and Toyota make an assload of money off  trucks, and frankly, there is little incentive to improve them or their fuel economy when you have people who will pay whatever the going rate to get one.  Look how long it's been since the Titan was updated?  10 years?!?  Or the Tacoma, or Ranger (which has been killed off with no replacement), Frontier, Chevy's trucks (until next year) and so on.
 
2013-07-09 04:08:50 PM  

bingo the psych-o: stuffy: It is a little difficult to move all the bodies in a mini.

Stalk more midgets.


Alternatively, get a woodchipper.

The proliferation of oversized vehicles in America really makes me ill. WTF are you people thinking? More pollution for our children to deal with? Yay!! More dependency on foreign oil? Yay!! This society of consumption is pretty goddamn retarded IMHO. I'm not perfect by any stretch, but at least my cars get 25+ MPH in commute traffic instead of the 12 or so you'd get in one of these beasts.
 
2013-07-09 04:12:43 PM  

Jument: bingo the psych-o: stuffy: It is a little difficult to move all the bodies in a mini.

Stalk more midgets.

Alternatively, get a woodchipper.

The proliferation of oversized vehicles in America really makes me ill. WTF are you people thinking? More pollution for our children to deal with? Yay!! More dependency on foreign oil? Yay!! This society of consumption is pretty goddamn retarded IMHO. I'm not perfect by any stretch, but at least my cars get 25+ MPH in commute traffic instead of the 12 or so you'd get in one of these beasts.


So YOU'RE that asshole always jamming up the left lane...
 
2013-07-09 04:18:59 PM  

Mi-5: Fissile: Gas at near $4 a gallon for a long time now, and this still the most popular vehicle among American farkwits.  Unbelievable.

I don't get it myself.  But the Big 2.5 and Nissan and Toyota make an assload of money off  trucks, and frankly, there is little incentive to improve them or their fuel economy when you have people who will pay whatever the going rate to get one.  Look how long it's been since the Titan was updated?  10 years?!?  Or the Tacoma, or Ranger (which has been killed off with no replacement), Frontier, Chevy's trucks (until next year) and so on.


Fuel economy has gotten a lot better in recent years.  Ford has their EcoBoost engine, Dodge is rolling out 8 speed transmissions, and Chevy apparently did something with the upcoming Silverado line to improve economy.

My dad's truck is only 3 years older than mine, but he averages about 13-14mpg overall whereas I average about 17-18mpg overall, and on a recent road trip I managed to get it up to just under 23mpg over about 300 miles.

The big things holding back further fuel economy gains are size and weight.  In the last decade compact pickup sales have constantly fallen while full size sales have mostly held steady and have improved the last couple years, so manufacturers aren't going to shrink the vehicles to save weight - the market clearly prefers larger pickups.

The only way left to shed weight is through the use of more advanced materials.  That means less cheap and easy to work with steel, and more expensive and difficult to work with aluminum and magnesium.  More expensive materials means that prices will go up and/or profit margins will shrink, and obviously that's something the manufacturers are trying to avoid.
 
2013-07-09 04:25:05 PM  

Jerkwater: Slight threadjack, but why the hell doesn't Ford make a smaller truck like the Ranger anymore?  I just need enough truck to get me to the dump on weekends and pick up the occasional yard of mulch or dirt.  I have no need or desire to drive a 100" wide truck.

Bought a Tacoma 8 years ago for the famed reliability, which did not turn out to be the case...


they still make the Ranger.

You just can't buy it in the US anymore.

I drive an F-150 myself. 'tis a fine truck indeed. except for all the enterior plastic trim crap.The bed is well dented and scratched. but its a basic two seater, V6, standard fleet type truck. that's the new Ranger.

Most people I know who get small trucks go with the Dodge Dakota.
 
2013-07-09 04:26:50 PM  

TuteTibiImperes: Mi-5: Fissile: Gas at near $4 a gallon for a long time now, and this still the most popular vehicle among American farkwits.  Unbelievable.

I don't get it myself.  But the Big 2.5 and Nissan and Toyota make an assload of money off  trucks, and frankly, there is little incentive to improve them or their fuel economy when you have people who will pay whatever the going rate to get one.  Look how long it's been since the Titan was updated?  10 years?!?  Or the Tacoma, or Ranger (which has been killed off with no replacement), Frontier, Chevy's trucks (until next year) and so on.

Fuel economy has gotten a lot better in recent years.  Ford has their EcoBoost engine, Dodge is rolling out 8 speed transmissions, and Chevy apparently did something with the upcoming Silverado line to improve economy.

My dad's truck is only 3 years older than mine, but he averages about 13-14mpg overall whereas I average about 17-18mpg overall, and on a recent road trip I managed to get it up to just under 23mpg over about 300 miles.

The big things holding back further fuel economy gains are size and weight.  In the last decade compact pickup sales have constantly fallen while full size sales have mostly held steady and have improved the last couple years, so manufacturers aren't going to shrink the vehicles to save weight - the market clearly prefers larger pickups.

The only way left to shed weight is through the use of more advanced materials.  That means less cheap and easy to work with steel, and more expensive and difficult to work with aluminum and magnesium.  More expensive materials means that prices will go up and/or profit margins will shrink, and obviously that's something the manufacturers are trying to avoid.


But the smaller truck thing is a joke.  Ford has a WORLD-CLASS Ranger it sells with a diesel engine everywhere else in the world and we get stiffed.  As much as I like the F150 with EcoBoost, all I really need is the Ranger sized pickup.  It gets good fuel economy and is small enough that I don't have to find an acre of space to park it.
 
2013-07-09 04:26:52 PM  

Jerkwater: Slight threadjack, but why the hell doesn't Ford make a smaller truck like the Ranger anymore?  I just need enough truck to get me to the dump on weekends and pick up the occasional yard of mulch or dirt.  I have no need or desire to drive a 100" wide truck.

Bought a Tacoma 8 years ago for the famed reliability, which did not turn out to be the case...


With current engine technology they can basically get the same gas mileage out of a v6 f 150 that they could out of a ranger but the 150 has like 3x the towing capacity and 2x the hauling capacity which basically makes the ranger functionally obselete piece of shiat.

Also a 150, 250, or single tire 350 is only around 73" wide not 100. I dont even think a 350-550 duelly is 100" wide. Maybe a f 650 commercial truck is.
 
2013-07-09 04:27:38 PM  

Cerebral Knievel: Jerkwater: Slight threadjack, but why the hell doesn't Ford make a smaller truck like the Ranger anymore?  I just need enough truck to get me to the dump on weekends and pick up the occasional yard of mulch or dirt.  I have no need or desire to drive a 100" wide truck.

Bought a Tacoma 8 years ago for the famed reliability, which did not turn out to be the case...

they still make the Ranger.

You just can't buy it in the US anymore.

I drive an F-150 myself. 'tis a fine truck indeed. except for all the enterior plastic trim crap.The bed is well dented and scratched. but its a basic two seater, V6, standard fleet type truck. that's the new Ranger.

Most people I know who get small trucks go with the Dodge Dakota.


The Dakota has been out of production since 2011.
 
2013-07-09 04:30:21 PM  
I love my 1997 Ford Ranger.

(I'd love it more if it were a bit less rusty)
 
2013-07-09 04:31:26 PM  

Mi-5: TuteTibiImperes: Mi-5: Fissile: Gas at near $4 a gallon for a long time now, and this still the most popular vehicle among American farkwits.  Unbelievable.

I don't get it myself.  But the Big 2.5 and Nissan and Toyota make an assload of money off  trucks, and frankly, there is little incentive to improve them or their fuel economy when you have people who will pay whatever the going rate to get one.  Look how long it's been since the Titan was updated?  10 years?!?  Or the Tacoma, or Ranger (which has been killed off with no replacement), Frontier, Chevy's trucks (until next year) and so on.

Fuel economy has gotten a lot better in recent years.  Ford has their EcoBoost engine, Dodge is rolling out 8 speed transmissions, and Chevy apparently did something with the upcoming Silverado line to improve economy.

My dad's truck is only 3 years older than mine, but he averages about 13-14mpg overall whereas I average about 17-18mpg overall, and on a recent road trip I managed to get it up to just under 23mpg over about 300 miles.

The big things holding back further fuel economy gains are size and weight.  In the last decade compact pickup sales have constantly fallen while full size sales have mostly held steady and have improved the last couple years, so manufacturers aren't going to shrink the vehicles to save weight - the market clearly prefers larger pickups.

The only way left to shed weight is through the use of more advanced materials.  That means less cheap and easy to work with steel, and more expensive and difficult to work with aluminum and magnesium.  More expensive materials means that prices will go up and/or profit margins will shrink, and obviously that's something the manufacturers are trying to avoid.

But the smaller truck thing is a joke.  Ford has a WORLD-CLASS Ranger it sells with a diesel engine everywhere else in the world and we get stiffed.  As much as I like the F150 with EcoBoost, all I really need is the Ranger sized pickup.  It gets good f ...


The global Ranger is bigger than our Ranger was.  It can't be imported into the US economically due to the chicken tax.  Plus, sales of compact pickups have been on a constant decline:

www.thetruthaboutcars.com

There's just no business case to be made for building a production line in the US for a vehicle that's close to the size of the F-150, would likely cannibalize some F-150 sales, and is part of a segment on the decline.
 
2013-07-09 04:41:31 PM  

Loaf's Tray: Jument: bingo the psych-o: stuffy: It is a little difficult to move all the bodies in a mini.

Stalk more midgets.

Alternatively, get a woodchipper.

The proliferation of oversized vehicles in America really makes me ill. WTF are you people thinking? More pollution for our children to deal with? Yay!! More dependency on foreign oil? Yay!! This society of consumption is pretty goddamn retarded IMHO. I'm not perfect by any stretch, but at least my cars get 25+ MPH in commute traffic instead of the 12 or so you'd get in one of these beasts.

So YOU'RE that asshole always jamming up the left lane...


You sound American. Protip: one can get reasonable mileage without hypermiling if you don't buy a stupidly oversized SUV or truck in the first place.

My primary ride is a Miata. Not a high mileage car by any stretch but I average 26 mph in mostly commute traffic.
 
2013-07-09 04:42:15 PM  

Jument: Loaf's Tray: Jument: bingo the psych-o: stuffy: It is a little difficult to move all the bodies in a mini.

Stalk more midgets.

Alternatively, get a woodchipper.

The proliferation of oversized vehicles in America really makes me ill. WTF are you people thinking? More pollution for our children to deal with? Yay!! More dependency on foreign oil? Yay!! This society of consumption is pretty goddamn retarded IMHO. I'm not perfect by any stretch, but at least my cars get 25+ MPH in commute traffic instead of the 12 or so you'd get in one of these beasts.

So YOU'RE that asshole always jamming up the left lane...

You sound American. Protip: one can get reasonable mileage without hypermiling if you don't buy a stupidly oversized SUV or truck in the first place.

My primary ride is a Miata. Not a high mileage car by any stretch but I average 26 mph in mostly commute traffic.


Egg on face! I meant to say MPG. The yolk's on me!
 
2013-07-09 04:44:44 PM  

Jerkwater: Slight threadjack, but why the hell doesn't Ford make a smaller truck like the Ranger anymore?  I just need enough truck to get me to the dump on weekends and pick up the occasional yard of mulch or dirt.  I have no need or desire to drive a 100" wide truck.

Bought a Tacoma 8 years ago for the famed reliability, which did not turn out to be the case...


Completely agree; I wanted a small pickup for odd jobs around the house, dump runs etc.  You know what? the current options for a small pickup, all suck!  I ended up with an F150, yes it has a trailer hitch and yes i use the bed!
 
2013-07-09 04:46:54 PM  

Hollie Maea: EnronX: 1.2 Mega Watt (1200kW), 1600HP motor?
Good lord could those be put into passenger vehicles?


Sure!  If you can find one that won't break.

What type of HP do you get with the current generation of Teslas or Nissan Leaf?

Sportiest Tesla Model S: 310kW
Sportiest Tesla Roadster: 215kW
Nissan Leaf: 80kW

A Miata with about 680kW:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_U5cTPC6EwE


Awesome, thanks Hollie Maea.

On the Miata how much weight and space do the batteries take up for that much KW?
Also curious what the theoretical range of a vehicle like that would be with such a massive power load?

FWIW my father loves his 2013 Leaf, he traded in his old 3 series BMW for it and doesn't seem to miss it one beat
 
2013-07-09 04:47:26 PM  

TuteTibiImperes: Cerebral Knievel: Jerkwater: Slight threadjack, but why the hell doesn't Ford make a smaller truck like the Ranger anymore?  I just need enough truck to get me to the dump on weekends and pick up the occasional yard of mulch or dirt.  I have no need or desire to drive a 100" wide truck.

Bought a Tacoma 8 years ago for the famed reliability, which did not turn out to be the case...

they still make the Ranger.

You just can't buy it in the US anymore.

I drive an F-150 myself. 'tis a fine truck indeed. except for all the enterior plastic trim crap.The bed is well dented and scratched. but its a basic two seater, V6, standard fleet type truck. that's the new Ranger.

Most people I know who get small trucks go with the Dodge Dakota.

The Dakota has been out of production since 2011.


ahh.. did not know that... then... my F-150 is a 02 and my ram 150 is an '89

both inherited.... haven't been car shopping since 1992.

by the way, anyone have a spare A815 transmision for my Ram?
and has dodge gotten better about the transmissions?
 
2013-07-09 04:47:50 PM  

Jument: Loaf's Tray: Jument: bingo the psych-o: stuffy: It is a little difficult to move all the bodies in a mini.

Stalk more midgets.

Alternatively, get a woodchipper.

The proliferation of oversized vehicles in America really makes me ill. WTF are you people thinking? More pollution for our children to deal with? Yay!! More dependency on foreign oil? Yay!! This society of consumption is pretty goddamn retarded IMHO. I'm not perfect by any stretch, but at least my cars get 25+ MPH in commute traffic instead of the 12 or so you'd get in one of these beasts.

So YOU'RE that asshole always jamming up the left lane...

You sound American. Protip: one can get reasonable mileage without hypermiling if you don't buy a stupidly oversized SUV or truck in the first place.

My primary ride is a Miata. Not a high mileage car by any stretch but I average 26 mph in mostly commute traffic.


My v6 150 gets like 22-23 mpg and could like fit your miatta in the bed.
 
2013-07-09 05:02:07 PM  

boarch: boarch: The article says 350 not 250 subtard

wow i wish i could delete myself


You'll never be able to delete the wound to my heart...  :(

//subby
 
2013-07-09 05:10:08 PM  

EnronX: On the Miata how much weight and space do the batteries take up for that much KW?


Not much...since he was going for drag racing, he used Lithium Polymer cells, which have a very high power density.  I think the pack is only like 20kWh or so, but the cells can output at 60C (which means that not counting for voltage sag they can output 60kW/kWh.  It also means that they will drain in 1 minute if you are foolish enough to run them at that rate for that long).  If he took it on the road and drove like a normal person they would probably be good for about 75 miles.

In my pickup truck thought experiment above, I was using a lot more cells, but with less power capabilities.  I would be putting 2 180aH cells in parallel, so 360aH.  Those cells can handle 10C so they would be able to supply the Shiva with its 3000 amps.  The upshot is that with a 51kWh pack, even a big truck would get over 100 miles of range if you drove it normally on the freeway.
 
2013-07-09 05:10:49 PM  

TuteTibiImperes: The global Ranger is bigger than our Ranger was. It can't be imported into the US economically due to the chicken tax. Plus, sales of compact pickups have been on a constant decline:


Gah.  Learn something new every day.  That is obnoxious.  I'd love to have a diesel ranger or foreign equivalent.
 
2013-07-09 05:11:32 PM  
I support these thieves 100%.  Anything to reduce the number of Fords on the road is a good thing

/Chevy
 
2013-07-09 05:16:28 PM  

harlock: I wonder what the stats are for a 2000 F-250.  I have a low mileage turbodiesel model that I use about once a month for hauling the trailer and other heavy stuff.   But it lives in a garage the rest of the time so it's not parked outside where visible.

Also for the trolls whining about people buying big trucks - at least in my case I actually use it for what it was intended for, not going to the grocery store.   My daily driver is a 30 MPG Mazda sport wagon.

I love the 7.3L turbodiesel.  Most reliable and powerful diesel engine that ever came with that truck.

-H


i got the 6.0 leaker after getting rid of the egr cooler it has been very reliable before that not so much
 
2013-07-09 05:17:01 PM  

Hollie Maea: The upshot is that with a 51kWh pack, even a big truck would get over 100 miles of range if you drove it normally on the freeway.


Correction...I forgot each motor has its own pack :)  The pack is actually 115kWh.  Even in the truck you should get over 250 miles.
 
2013-07-09 05:21:50 PM  

jjorsett: lunkhed: In the UK traditional auto theft has all but disappeared. Since proper anti-theft measures are on all cars (and a lot of bikes), you need the key to start it - hot-wiring just won't work.

Thieves instead burgle houses, looking for keys. Burglary has gone through the roof.

Yay for thieves.

Isn't the entire country carpeted with security cameras? I would think that all you'd have to do is track the car from the house to the chop shop via video recordings.


fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net
 
2013-07-09 05:24:59 PM  

Hollie Maea: EnronX: On the Miata how much weight and space do the batteries take up for that much KW?

Not much...since he was going for drag racing, he used Lithium Polymer cells, which have a very high power density.  I think the pack is only like 20kWh or so, but the cells can output at 60C (which means that not counting for voltage sag they can output 60kW/kWh.  It also means that they will drain in 1 minute if you are foolish enough to run them at that rate for that long).  If he took it on the road and drove like a normal person they would probably be good for about 75 miles.

In my pickup truck thought experiment above, I was using a lot more cells, but with less power capabilities.  I would be putting 2 180aH cells in parallel, so 360aH.  Those cells can handle 10C so they would be able to supply the Shiva with its 3000 amps.  The upshot is that with a 51kWh pack, even a big truck would get over 100 miles of range if you drove it normally on the freeway.


Even if it could go 100 mi driving normally(empty) on the freeway how far could it go with a giganormous 5th wheel trailer that weighs several times what the truck does?
 
2013-07-09 05:26:40 PM  

Oldiron_79: Even if it could go 100 mi driving normally(empty) on the freeway how far could it go with a giganormous 5th wheel trailer that weighs several times what the truck does?


I don't have a pickup so I don't really know,  but the decrease in range should be the same ratio as the decrease in gas mileage for an ICE truck
 
2013-07-09 05:41:42 PM  

Hollie Maea: Oldiron_79: Even if it could go 100 mi driving normally(empty) on the freeway how far could it go with a giganormous 5th wheel trailer that weighs several times what the truck does?

I don't have a pickup so I don't really know,  but the decrease in range should be the same ratio as the decrease in gas mileage for an ICE truck


Well you lose about 6 mpg whether its a gasser that gets like 12 empty or a diesel that gets like 20 empty, so thats like 50%decrease on a gasser, like 30% decrease on an oil burner.
 
2013-07-09 05:53:29 PM  

Oldiron_79: Hollie Maea: Oldiron_79: Even if it could go 100 mi driving normally(empty) on the freeway how far could it go with a giganormous 5th wheel trailer that weighs several times what the truck does?

I don't have a pickup so I don't really know,  but the decrease in range should be the same ratio as the decrease in gas mileage for an ICE truck

Well you lose about 6 mpg whether its a gasser that gets like 12 empty or a diesel that gets like 20 empty, so thats like 50%decrease on a gasser, like 30% decrease on an oil burner.


It's all about RPMs with the gas vs diesel.  Peak torque is usually at a relatively high RPM on a gas engine, so you need to rev it up to get the load moving, and the higher the RPMs, the move fuel you're using.  Diesels have peak torque at relatively low RPMs (and greater torque overall), so they don't need to work as hard to move a big load.

I know electric motors can make peak torque at 0 rpm, so, perhaps they would be well suited for a towing application.

GM, Chrysler, and Daimler teamed up to design what they call their 'two mode hybrid' system that actually works best in heavy vehicles (the system itself is pretty heavy and expensive, so it isn't a great fit for smaller or inexpensive cars).  GM  used it in the hybrid versions of their Tahoe, Silverado, and Escalade, and Daimler has used it in buses.
 
2013-07-09 06:00:25 PM  

Oldiron_79: Even if it could go 100 mi driving normally(empty) on the freeway how far could it go with a giganormous 5th wheel trailer that weighs several times what the truck does?


It depends.  The weight actually matters less than what the rolling resistance works out to, the additional air resistance, etc...  Whether or not he gets regenerative braking working.

Final option is to toss a diesel generator into the trailer and run that to feed electricity to the motors/batteries to extend the range.
 
2013-07-09 06:03:10 PM  

Oldiron_79: Hollie Maea: Oldiron_79: Even if it could go 100 mi driving normally(empty) on the freeway how far could it go with a giganormous 5th wheel trailer that weighs several times what the truck does?

I don't have a pickup so I don't really know,  but the decrease in range should be the same ratio as the decrease in gas mileage for an ICE truck

Well you lose about 6 mpg whether its a gasser that gets like 12 empty or a diesel that gets like 20 empty, so thats like 50%decrease on a gasser, like 30% decrease on an oil burner.


Sounds reasonable.  Probably would be closer to the oil burner since it has a flat torque band.  Also, like I mentioned I made an error and the empty range should be around 250 miles, not 100+.  Still, this wouldn't be the most practical vehicle.  I would probably mostly use it to go to tavern parking lots and taunt other truck owners into challenging me to one of those tug of war things they like to do.  Then rip their axles off.  Well, I'd do that once.  Then I would be killed dead.
 
2013-07-09 06:15:06 PM  

Jument: bingo the psych-o: stuffy: It is a little difficult to move all the bodies in a mini.

Stalk more midgets.

Alternatively, get a woodchipper.

The proliferation of oversized vehicles in America really makes me ill. WTF are you people thinking? More pollution for our children to deal with? Yay!! More dependency on foreign oil? Yay!! This society of consumption is pretty goddamn retarded IMHO. I'm not perfect by any stretch, but at least my cars get 25+ MPH in commute traffic instead of the 12 or so you'd get in one of these beasts.


I'm thinking that I need to make money, which means I need a vehicle that can tow a trailer with 800 pounds of tongue-weight. I'm thinking that I own a fixer-upper house and I need a vehicle that can fit full sheets of sheetrock and plywood in it. I'm thinking that because of the house, I need a vehicle that can take large amounts of brush or construction waste to the dump.

And without a truck to tow it, how do you suggest I bring home a woodchipper large enough to run a body through?
 
2013-07-09 06:20:36 PM  
I suspect I've taken a FWD sedan more times off the pavement than most Ford pickup trucks that I see.  (Minimum maintenance forest service "roads" can lead to great places!)

However, I'm not going to rant about people who buy big pickup trucks and try to justify it somehow.  It's their choice, and if it makes them happy, well, good for them.

But hey, don't try to pretend that you have a hard working truck when it nary has a scratch on it.  Nobody's buying that.
 
2013-07-09 06:21:31 PM  

TuteTibiImperes: Oldiron_79: Hollie Maea: Oldiron_79: Even if it could go 100 mi driving normally(empty) on the freeway how far could it go with a giganormous 5th wheel trailer that weighs several times what the truck does?

I don't have a pickup so I don't really know,  but the decrease in range should be the same ratio as the decrease in gas mileage for an ICE truck

Well you lose about 6 mpg whether its a gasser that gets like 12 empty or a diesel that gets like 20 empty, so thats like 50%decrease on a gasser, like 30% decrease on an oil burner.

It's all about RPMs with the gas vs diesel.  Peak torque is usually at a relatively high RPM on a gas engine, so you need to rev it up to get the load moving, and the higher the RPMs, the move fuel you're using.  Diesels have peak torque at relatively low RPMs (and greater torque overall), so they don't need to work as hard to move a big load.

I know electric motors can make peak torque at 0 rpm, so, perhaps they would be well suited for a towing application.

GM, Chrysler, and Daimler teamed up to design what they call their 'two mode hybrid' system that actually works best in heavy vehicles (the system itself is pretty heavy and expensive, so it isn't a great fit for smaller or inexpensive cars).  GM  used it in the hybrid versions of their Tahoe, Silverado, and Escalade, and Daimler has used it in buses.


Yeah the peak torque at 0 rpm thing is intriqueing about electric. If you had a 3rd rail where batteries wasnt a concern all trucks would probably be electric.
 
2013-07-09 06:22:25 PM  
Decent muscle car + removable trailer hitch + tandem axle landscaping trailer = no need for truck in terms of construction tasks in a urban setting.
 
2013-07-09 06:25:42 PM  

To Wish Impossible Things: I suspect I've taken a FWD sedan more times off the pavement than most Ford pickup trucks that I see.  (Minimum maintenance forest service "roads" can lead to great places!)

However, I'm not going to rant about people who buy big pickup trucks and try to justify it somehow.  It's their choice, and if it makes them happy, well, good for them.

But hey, don't try to pretend that you have a hard working truck when it nary has a scratch on it.  Nobody's buying that.


My 2wd truck probably sees more off road than most 4wds, much of it on those forest service dirt fire "roads". They tend to have bumps that would bottom out a car in my area.
 
2013-07-09 06:28:43 PM  

studebaker hoch: Decent muscle car + removable trailer hitch + tandem axle landscaping trailer = no need for truck in terms of construction tasks in a urban setting.


Well for the folks complaining about the ranger being discontinued because they need a bed but not weight capacity a utility trailer pulled behind whatever car you like is probably better than a ranger for thier needs anyways
 
2013-07-09 06:31:00 PM  
GM and Ford should stop making these long, tall, wide-ass trucks. Most of the people who buy them probably don't even use them for hauling hardcore stuff or towing. just trips to the stores and back.
It's really hard to see around them when you're turning at an intersection, or if they park behind you on a parallel-parking street.

/ has a 1993 Toyota Xtra cab. Bare bones 4 cyl., manual doors/windows, auto trans. only has 135,000kms.  (drove less than 25,000kms in the three years I've had it).
In that time I've only had to fix two things that went wrong with it: from cat-back exhaust ($600 parts and labour), and a $25 thermostat. Gets between 300 - 425 kms per 50L tank from empty. Insurance only $600 per year. I think I have it better in almost every way v.s. one of those F-250's.
 
2013-07-09 06:35:13 PM  

Oldiron_79: My v6 150 gets like 22-23 mpg and could like fit your miatta in the bed.


Think about what you said for a moment. Why is it better to have a larger vehicle?

And bullshiat on that figure. You may get 23 highway but you do not get that in commuting traffic. I get 26 MPG during my commute. Not stop and go but pretty bad usually, which hundreds of feet of climb each way (two large valleys in between home and work). Highway my mileage is quite a lot higher than 26.

/bigger is better? that's what she said!
 
2013-07-09 06:36:35 PM  

TuteTibiImperes: I know electric motors can make peak torque at 0 rpm, so, perhaps they would be well suited for a towing application.


They're beyond 'well suited', look up 'diesel-electric train', they're outstanding for towing applications.  The batteries, not so much.

I have a saying:
Electric has excellent motors, pathetic energy storage
Internal combustion has lousy motors, superior energy storage.

At some point, size wise, it's more efficient to run a dedicated generator that, because it doesn't need a wide power band, can be optimized for that power band to the point that even with the losses from going from a generator to a controller to a motor it's still more efficient than hooking the engine directly up to the drive train.
 
2013-07-09 06:46:28 PM  

Jument: Oldiron_79: My v6 150 gets like 22-23 mpg and could like fit your miatta in the bed.

Think about what you said for a moment. Why is it better to have a larger vehicle?

And bullshiat on that figure. You may get 23 highway but you do not get that in commuting traffic. I get 26 MPG during my commute. Not stop and go but pretty bad usually, which hundreds of feet of climb each way (two large valleys in between home and work). Highway my mileage is quite a lot higher than 26.

/bigger is better? that's what she said!


Well first off a miatta would not pull my boat or my junk cars so I am not gonna trade in on a Miatta no matter what

23 is definitely a highway mileage for me but city is like still over 20 empty(I averaged it over a couple of weeks) and like 21.6 and thats mostly city not much highway)
 
2013-07-09 06:51:17 PM  

Oldiron_79: Jument: Oldiron_79: My v6 150 gets like 22-23 mpg and could like fit your miatta in the bed.

Think about what you said for a moment. Why is it better to have a larger vehicle?

And bullshiat on that figure. You may get 23 highway but you do not get that in commuting traffic. I get 26 MPG during my commute. Not stop and go but pretty bad usually, which hundreds of feet of climb each way (two large valleys in between home and work). Highway my mileage is quite a lot higher than 26.

/bigger is better? that's what she said!

Well first off a miatta would not pull my boat or my junk cars so I am not gonna trade in on a Miatta no matter what

23 is definitely a highway mileage for me but city is like still over 20 empty(I averaged it over a couple of weeks) and like 21.6 and thats mostly city not much highway)


One man's "city" is not the same as another man's "city".  Where my parents live, you can cruise around the "city" at 40MPH and almost never stop, and the turns are huge and gentle.  Whereas for me, everywhere you turn is stop-and-go.  The difference between living where there are jobs and being retired.
 
2013-07-09 06:53:30 PM  

Jument: Oldiron_79: My v6 150 gets like 22-23 mpg and could like fit your miatta in the bed.

Think about what you said for a moment. Why is it better to have a larger vehicle?


I'll answer that one.  Bigger is better when you have enough people and/or stuff to move around.  I don't always have 7 or more people in my van but when I do I'm the only one around that can do it.  Not only that but I can move 7 people and tow damned near anything I could possibly want to tow at the same time.

Sure it sucks only getting 12/15 mpg.  But unlike so many whiners here I can afford it.  I can't afford to not be able to transport people and items.
 
2013-07-09 06:57:30 PM  

Smeggy Smurf: Jument: Oldiron_79: My v6 150 gets like 22-23 mpg and could like fit your miatta in the bed.

Think about what you said for a moment. Why is it better to have a larger vehicle?

I'll answer that one.  Bigger is better when you have enough people and/or stuff to move around.  I don't always have 7 or more people in my van but when I do I'm the only one around that can do it.  Not only that but I can move 7 people and tow damned near anything I could possibly want to tow at the same time.

Sure it sucks only getting 12/15 mpg.  But unlike so many whiners here I can afford it.  I can't afford to not be able to transport people and items.


No - you need the huge vehicle for protection!   You need the giant suburban for Mom and the baby seat - it's armor to compensate for poor driving.
 
2013-07-09 07:00:38 PM  

Smeggy Smurf: I don't always have 7 or more people in my van but when I do I'm the only one around that can do it.


Tesla Model S (well not the "or more" part).  But yeah.
 
2013-07-09 07:23:43 PM  

Hollie Maea: Smeggy Smurf: I don't always have 7 or more people in my van but when I do I'm the only one around that can do it.

Tesla Model S (well not the "or more" part).  But yeah.


Only if at least 2 of them are children and you're willing to give up the storage space.  A van can carry 7+ and still have space to carry a reasonable amount of luggage for everyone to the airport.
 
2013-07-09 07:28:40 PM  

Oldiron_79: To Wish Impossible Things: I suspect I've taken a FWD sedan more times off the pavement than most Ford pickup trucks that I see.  (Minimum maintenance forest service "roads" can lead to great places!)

However, I'm not going to rant about people who buy big pickup trucks and try to justify it somehow.  It's their choice, and if it makes them happy, well, good for them.

But hey, don't try to pretend that you have a hard working truck when it nary has a scratch on it.  Nobody's buying that.

My 2wd truck probably sees more off road than most 4wds, much of it on those forest service dirt fire "roads". They tend to have bumps that would bottom out a car in my area.


Yep, that does suck.  Not so much the bumps, but the protruding rocks that look ready to rip something off the bottom of my car.

I've had to sit back and think for a few minutes about how I was going to proceed.
 
2013-07-09 07:28:55 PM  

Firethorn: Hollie Maea: Smeggy Smurf: I don't always have 7 or more people in my van but when I do I'm the only one around that can do it.

Tesla Model S (well not the "or more" part).  But yeah.

Only if at least 2 of them are children and you're willing to give up the storage space.  A van can carry 7+ and still have space to carry a reasonable amount of luggage for everyone to the airport.


OK...Tesla Model X then, when it comes out :)  Alright I'm done being an obnoxious EV evangelist.  I'll try anyway.  Oh yeah and with the Model S you still have the "frunk" when you put kids in the third row.

OK Now I'm done.
 
2013-07-09 07:30:52 PM  

To Wish Impossible Things: Yep, that does suck.  Not so much the bumps, but the protruding rocks that look ready to rip something off the bottom of my car.


My dad took us up to Bird Creek Meadows (Mt. Adams wilderness) in a Toyota Camry last summer.  I...would not advise it (well in such a vehicle that is...Bird Creek Meadows is great).  How that thing survived the trip is beyond me.
 
2013-07-09 07:39:50 PM  

To Wish Impossible Things: Oldiron_79: To Wish Impossible Things: I suspect I've taken a FWD sedan more times off the pavement than most Ford pickup trucks that I see.  (Minimum maintenance forest service "roads" can lead to great places!)

However, I'm not going to rant about people who buy big pickup trucks and try to justify it somehow.  It's their choice, and if it makes them happy, well, good for them.

But hey, don't try to pretend that you have a hard working truck when it nary has a scratch on it.  Nobody's buying that.

My 2wd truck probably sees more off road than most 4wds, much of it on those forest service dirt fire "roads". They tend to have bumps that would bottom out a car in my area.

Yep, that does suck.  Not so much the bumps, but the protruding rocks that look ready to rip something off the bottom of my car.

I've had to sit back and think for a few minutes about how I was going to proceed.


Yeah Ive seen some protruding rocks that could take an oil pan off a car on these "roads"
 
2013-07-09 07:45:42 PM  

ddam: Fissile: Gas at near $4 a gallon for a long time now, and this still the most popular vehicle among American farkwits.  Unbelievable.

What's the cost of an F250? $40k? more? I doubt it's the cost for people that need to keep an eye for MPG due to cost of gas. Also, I'm betting that those F250s get chopped up and shipped to Mexico or Latin America when those trucks are used offroad.


Funny you'd mention that.  I helped manage a Ford fleet about 12 years ago for a large oil company that starts with a C and ends with an O.  We had plenty of trucks down in border towns.  One day, my boss gets a call from one of the guys in the field saying that his F250 is "lost" somewhere in Mexico.  Boss and bosses' boss start working with impound lots, law enforcement on up to some Mexican government official.  Guess what? The "lost" truck was never recovered.

CSS
 
2013-07-09 08:07:38 PM  

noitsnot: Smeggy Smurf: Jument: Oldiron_79: My v6 150 gets like 22-23 mpg and could like fit your miatta in the bed.

Think about what you said for a moment. Why is it better to have a larger vehicle?

I'll answer that one.  Bigger is better when you have enough people and/or stuff to move around.  I don't always have 7 or more people in my van but when I do I'm the only one around that can do it.  Not only that but I can move 7 people and tow damned near anything I could possibly want to tow at the same time.

Sure it sucks only getting 12/15 mpg.  But unlike so many whiners here I can afford it.  I can't afford to not be able to transport people and items.

No - you need the huge vehicle for protection!   You need the giant suburban for Mom and the baby seat - it's armor to compensate for poor driving.


In a way, yeah.  The assholes around here can't see small cars.  But they do see 5,000 lbs of conversion van.  Plus it makes hippies wet the bed over the damage I'm doing to the planet.  Their tears make my dick hard.
 
2013-07-09 10:19:56 PM  
Oldiron_79 *

studebaker hoch: Decent muscle car + removable trailer hitch + tandem axle landscaping trailer = no need for truck in terms of construction tasks in a urban setting.

Well for the folks complaining about the ranger being discontinued because they need a bed but not weight capacity a utility trailer pulled behind whatever car you like is probably better than a ranger for thier needs anyways


A landscaping trailer could actually pull a big stack of plywood or sheetrock.

The eight-foot truck bed is almost  history.  Look around.  I bet the next 20 trucks you see don't have one.

/a shiny pickup truck with perfect paint tells the world you don't actually use it like a pickup truck.  it's an oversized car.
 
2013-07-09 10:32:14 PM  

Smeggy Smurf: Plus it makes hippies wet the bed over the damage I'm doing to the planet.  Their tears make my dick hard.


Run along now, Timmy.  The adults are talking.  And put that thing away, for God's sake.  What have I told you about playing with it in public?
 
2013-07-09 11:56:18 PM  
Dr_luckyz

Johnnyflash: A 4x4 truck can climb mountains, go through mud and snow, we rescue people, we are heroes.

Yet a majority of the vehicles I see fly off the road when it snows are trucks...I guess you can call your fellow heroes for help.


[did_someone_get_told.jpg]

/ Real heroes never say anything.
 
2013-07-10 12:43:05 AM  

studebaker hoch: Oldiron_79 *

studebaker hoch: Decent muscle car + removable trailer hitch + tandem axle landscaping trailer = no need for truck in terms of construction tasks in a urban setting.

Well for the folks complaining about the ranger being discontinued because they need a bed but not weight capacity a utility trailer pulled behind whatever car you like is probably better than a ranger for thier needs anyways

A landscaping trailer could actually pull a big stack of plywood or sheetrock.

The eight-foot truck bed is almost  history.  Look around.  I bet the next 20 trucks you see don't have one.

/a shiny pickup truck with perfect paint tells the world you don't actually use it like a pickup truck.  it's an oversized car.


Yeah like 90 % of anything you see anymore is an ultramega cab with a extrashort bed

Drive a beater standard cab long bed with lots of dings and well used hitch.
 
2013-07-10 03:53:59 AM  

ddam: oldfarthenry: [www.marax.at image 453x339]
2" of snow? BRING IT ON!!

No scratches or dents? That truck sees more car washes than trips in the snow/mud.


It's the same for all the idiots who bought Hummer H2's... then all of a sudden realized you can't fit those monsters in a standard automatic car wash - they're too wide for the tracks and the car wash itself.  Then the cold realization that you'd have to manually wash it in a bay yourself - well what kind of millionaire wants to do that?

Always wondered why I don't see H2's on the road so much anymore.

/Good.
 
2013-07-10 09:38:13 AM  
I recently bought an 01' Silverado 2500 HD diesel so I'm getting a kick out of this thread.  Pulls my camper like a boss.
 
2013-07-10 02:05:54 PM  

studebaker hoch: /a shiny pickup truck with perfect paint tells the world you don't actually use it like a pickup truck. it's an oversized car.


Why?  While I have a few scratches, they're what any car could get. Using a pickup as a pickup doesn't mean you're offroading or even spending loads of time on gravel or unimproved roads.  But I put stuff in the bed all the time.  Filling the bed up doesn't translate to scratches, scratching up the truck indicates that you're lazy.   Drop the tailgate to load, secure your load.  Good to go.

Unless you're talking about scratching the paint job inside the bed; but then most people have some sort of 'tough coat' in there anymore.

Even if you never leave the road, a truck is useful for hauling/towing stuff.  If you're getting one 'just' for off-roading, you're probably better off with something like a Jeep.
 
2013-07-10 03:51:27 PM  
Firethorn

If the truck shows any wear *at all*, it's not a prima-donna garage queen.
 
2013-07-10 05:22:54 PM  

studebaker hoch: If the truck shows any wear *at all*, it's not a prima-donna garage queen.


I was objecting to "oversized car"; 'prima-donna garage queen' is a separate condition that any vehicle can suffer.  ;)
 
2013-07-10 09:57:20 PM  
Strange article, it gets its data from the "Highway Loss Data Institute" but the NICB completely disagrees with them, the most current stats still show that small 90's Jap cars are the most stolen. 2006 F-Series (they're not broken out into F150, 250, 350) are on the list, but #6, with 2004 Silverado at #4.

Odd that it's only that one specific year, maybe it was the last year before immobilizers or some other anti-theft?
 
Displayed 112 of 112 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report