If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Trentonian)   Police called for report of naked people on the boardwalk at Jersey Shore. The naked people were two- and four-years-old, respectively   (trentonian.com) divider line 67
    More: Asinine, boardwalks, nude  
•       •       •

5536 clicks; posted to Main » on 08 Jul 2013 at 8:40 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



67 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-07-08 08:44:00 AM
Children run naked at my local beaches.

Stupid prudes.
 
2013-07-08 08:45:33 AM
Because obviously if the human body is naked at whatever age there is obviously the urge to sexualize it and hence the need to cover it up
 
2013-07-08 08:46:04 AM

Uncle Tractor: Children run naked at my local beaches.

Stupid prudes.


Good Lord, I hope they use sunscreen
 
2013-07-08 08:47:23 AM
I guess there are no larger issues needing attention more than the naked baby problem.
 
2013-07-08 08:47:38 AM
Sounds like the cop got a little full in his diaper looking at a naked toddler.
 
2013-07-08 08:49:52 AM
u can't go thru your life thinking that nuditiy is ok. u just CANT
 
2013-07-08 08:50:46 AM
I would have loved to see the expression on the cop's face when he realized that the "naked people" were toddlers.
 
2013-07-08 08:52:40 AM
well if your naked.  your either a naked child or a naked adult on bath salts/PCP.  see this is what laws do to people.  they have to use DRUGS to defeat the anxiety that U GAVE THEM. about NUDITY.
 
2013-07-08 08:55:00 AM

Bashar and Asma's Infinite Playlist: Sounds like the cop got a little full in his diaper looking at a naked toddler.


Know how I know you didn't actually read the article?
 
2013-07-08 08:57:58 AM

silverjets: Bashar and Asma's Infinite Playlist: Sounds like the cop got a little full in his diaper looking at a naked toddler.

Know how I know you didn't actually read the article?


Yeah, sounds like the real cop actually made a sound decision for once.
 
2013-07-08 08:59:01 AM

Jon iz teh kewl: well if your naked.  your either a naked child or a naked adult on bath salts/PCP.  see this is what laws do to people.  they have to use DRUGS to defeat the anxiety that U GAVE THEM. about NUDITY.

 
2013-07-08 08:59:19 AM

IdBeCrazyIf: Because obviously if the human body is naked at whatever age there is obviously the urge to sexualize it and hence the need to cover it up


I'll bet the "beach supervisor" carefully supervised the whole time....
 
2013-07-08 09:04:26 AM
"Respective" to what, subby?
 
2013-07-08 09:04:29 AM

silverjets: Bashar and Asma's Infinite Playlist: Sounds like the cop got a little full in his diaper looking at a naked toddler.

Know how I know you didn't actually read the article?


Because it's Fark?

Because it's nine in the morning and I read "a man, later identified to me by a police officer" as "a man, later identified to me as a police officer?"

Because it's Fark?
 
2013-07-08 09:09:58 AM

edmo: IdBeCrazyIf: Because obviously if the human body is naked at whatever age there is obviously the urge to sexualize it and hence the need to cover it up

I'll bet the "beach supervisor" carefully supervised the whole time....


Which reminds me to send in my application for lifeguard at the Dunes
 
2013-07-08 09:11:20 AM

StrangeQ: silverjets: Bashar and Asma's Infinite Playlist: Sounds like the cop got a little full in his diaper looking at a naked toddler.

Know how I know you didn't actually read the article?

Yeah, sounds like the real cop actually made a sound decision for once.


Do you know how many thousands of stupid and idiotic calls cops get and how many times they make "sound decisions"? You just never hear about that because it isn't news or entertaining in the slightest. You'll only hear of it when it goes wrong.

/not a cop.
//really I'm not
 
2013-07-08 09:11:40 AM
So if you happened to be taking pictures that morning on the boardwalk and unknowingly captured these toddlers in one or more of your shots should you be arrested for possession of kiddie porn?
 
2013-07-08 09:12:01 AM
FTFA: "So what did we do? What any other decent parent of small children with sand up their respective wazoos would do..."

Well, that's the problem right there. You can't go around displaying sandy, non-grand wazoos. Silly parents.

www.ruudseye.com

If it ain't grand, leave it at home.
 
2013-07-08 09:12:10 AM
Everyone on that boardwalk is now guilty of viewing live child pornography and should be sent to prison as well as being placed on the sex offender list for the rest of their lives.
 
2013-07-08 09:14:54 AM
Ha, if that happen to me I'd threaten sue that guy for watching my naked children which would shut that guy up real quick since even if no charges or paperwork are filed, just the rumor that he is some sort of pedo will follow him and ruin the rest of his life.
 
2013-07-08 09:24:41 AM

fzumrk: Everyone on that boardwalk is now guilty of viewing live child pornography and should be sent to prison as well as being placed on the sex offender list for the rest of their lives.


Live Child Pornography?  where can i get some
 
2013-07-08 09:30:34 AM
fzumrk: Everyone on that boardwalk is now guilty of viewing live child pornography and should be sent to prison as well as being placed on the sex offender list for the rest of their lives.

Jon iz teh kewl: Live Child Pornography?  where can i get some?


www.nationalenquirer.com

//obligatory
 
2013-07-08 09:37:50 AM
It's not so much the nudity, but the increased probability of their droppings getting all over the boardwalk.
 
2013-07-08 09:39:04 AM

Oh_Enough_Already: fzumrk: Everyone on that boardwalk is now guilty of viewing live child pornography and should be sent to prison as well as being placed on the sex offender list for the rest of their lives.

Seriously, though, if it's illegal to posses a photo of something like this, why is it legal to parade it around in public?

And if/when somebody did take a pic, the same parents complaining this was "ridiculous" would be demanding "why didn't somebody stop them!?!?!?"


its not illegal to possess

i2.kym-cdn.com
 
2013-07-08 09:40:22 AM
I'd be willing to bet the beach supervisor's computer holds a huge stash of porn.
 
2013-07-08 09:41:05 AM
Naked people at Jersey Shore? That's unheard of.
 
2013-07-08 09:49:55 AM
respectively?  Learn to English, please.
 
2013-07-08 09:50:54 AM
So, they're sex offenders now, right?
 
2013-07-08 09:51:54 AM

bikerbob59: So, they're sex offenders now, right?


was there public urination involved?  no?  then no.
 
2013-07-08 10:08:27 AM
Given it's Jersey Shore, those cops must have been devastated to find it was just two kids, rather than the chance to tazer and capture two live oompa loompas.
 
2013-07-08 10:14:00 AM
Rick Perry would have had them burned at the stake.
 
2013-07-08 10:23:23 AM

Uncle Tractor: Children run naked at my local beaches.


Adults run naked at mine.

And teenagers.

And ... the sky doesn't fall.
 
2013-07-08 10:55:24 AM

All Latest: Naked people at Jersey Shore? That's unheard of.


If I weren't at work, I'd link to the webpage for Gunnison Beach.
 
2013-07-08 10:57:59 AM
Your primitive notions of modesty.

devo.nicostudio.ca
 
2013-07-08 10:58:27 AM

Badgerlad: Given it's Jersey Shore, those cops must have been devastated to find it was just two kids, rather than the chance to tazer and capture two live oompa loompas.


Are you kidding?  You do not want to taze an oompa loompa. You know how sausages on the grill will sometimes spit oil at you?
 
2013-07-08 11:04:04 AM

Loaf's Tray: "Respective" to what, subby?


Also:

She's a two-year-old.  CORRECT
She's two-years-old.  WRONG

Like people who use "whom" incorrectly, you tried to sound smart and ended up sounding much less so.
 
2013-07-08 11:15:38 AM
Oh look, it's another thread full of Farkers protesting a little too loudly about "pedos."

/how about teaching your kids how to dress like people before hauling them out into the general public?
 
2013-07-08 11:28:41 AM
How about some therapy for the people who complained?
 
2013-07-08 11:35:13 AM
The message boards are full of stupid.

YOU BROKE THE LAW!  HOW DARE YOU COMPLAIN CITIZEN!

These are the first arse clowns who complain that the police are infringin' mah rites!' when it comes to them, but someone to complain about an overzealous staffer?  Well now don't do that you whiny bastich, alles in ordnung afterall.
 
2013-07-08 11:40:29 AM
The naked baby thing aside
That writer is a douche and deserves a cock punch
Can't believe his editors allowed that dribble to be published
 
2013-07-08 11:51:59 AM

MyToeHurts: The naked baby thing aside
That writer is a douche and deserves a cock punch
Can't believe his editors allowed that dribble to be published


I disagree. Who knows how many other parents were harassed by the "beach supervisor" but don't work for a newspaper. In a sane world, people washing their children off after time at the beach would be a completely normal and accepted activity. That it's not is a sad and mockable state of affairs. It's worth publishing the article to shame that town for being stupid.

Unfortunately, most of the comments on the story are of the "your kids shouldn't be naked" variety. To me, those people are either trolling, or the USA has gone way, way, toward the dark side.
 
2013-07-08 11:54:17 AM

DocUi: The message boards are full of stupid.

YOU BROKE THE LAW!  HOW DARE YOU COMPLAIN CITIZEN!

These are the first arse clowns who complain that the police are infringin' mah rites!' when it comes to them, but someone to complain about an overzealous staffer?  Well now don't do that you whiny bastich, alles in ordnung afterall.


A big, fat THIS.

If you have a problem with little kids running around naked at a beach then you are an idiot.  They're little kids for f*ck's sake, they have no concept of sexuality.  They're simply having fun at the beach and some people want to stop that because they might see a pre-pubescent penis or a barely-visible pudenda.  I would contend that those in opposition are really the ones with the problem as they automatically conflate naked children with paedophilia.  As for the whole "Ooh no, a pedo might grab them" argument that's pathetic!  They might do that anywhere, the beach is probably less likely given the fact that there's very little cover and potentially thousands of witnesses/have-a-go-heroes around.  On the list of offensive sights one might encounter in public, a naked toddler is way, way down.
 
2013-07-08 12:14:55 PM
WON'T SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?

No... not when you... fap... you pervert...
 
2013-07-08 12:20:14 PM

MyToeHurts: The naked baby thing aside
That writer is a douche and deserves a cock punch
Can't believe his editors allowed that dribble to be published


One should probably not confuse the word "dribble" with "drivel" if one is going to use it to critique another person's writing.

/just sayin'
 
2013-07-08 12:23:05 PM

jasenj1: MyToeHurts: The naked baby thing aside
That writer is a douche and deserves a cock punch
Can't believe his editors allowed that dribble to be published

I disagree. Who knows how many other parents were harassed by the "beach supervisor" but don't work for a newspaper. In a sane world, people washing their children off after time at the beach would be a completely normal and accepted activity. That it's not is a sad and mockable state of affairs. It's worth publishing the article to shame that town for being stupid.

Unfortunately, most of the comments on the story are of the "your kids shouldn't be naked" variety. To me, those people are either trolling, or the USA has gone way, way, toward the dark side.


I don't think MyToeHurts was talking about the fact that it was published, but rather the tone and language of the article.  And I have to agree.  The writer's arrogant, snide, self-righteous tone seemed to be trying to portray himself as the pinnacle of martyrdom. He somehow managed to blow an already ridiculous circumstance further out of proportion, suggesting starting a protest march because his children might've been thrown in prison for 90 days.  I want to argue the opposing side just to prove this douchebag wrong.
 
2013-07-08 12:28:53 PM
Ahhhhhhh....brisk.
 
2013-07-08 12:40:23 PM
Why wouldn't you just pull open the swimsuit for a bit, rinse them off, and continue on your way? When I was a kid we didn't even wash off. We just put towels down, piled into the car, showered/changed when we got home, and my mom vacuumed the car later.
 
2013-07-08 01:11:02 PM
I've been to the shore and I'd think twice about going BAREFOOT let alone expose my genitals in that environment.

/broken glass and garbage everywhere
 
2013-07-08 01:15:14 PM
No need for hyphens when you say somebody is "two years old", subby. (That's only when the whole phrase is used as a modifier, as in "That two-year-old child is two years old".)

Also, "respectively" is only used when there are two lists, to indicate that the items in the list are in corresponding order, as in "Boss Hogg and Daisy Duke are pathetic and hot, respectively". It serves no purpose here.

Hope this helps.
 
2013-07-08 01:17:58 PM
Better they crap there pants than were I walk.
 
Displayed 50 of 67 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report