If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Courthouse News Service)   Refusing to let the police use your home as a lookout? That's a smashed open door and assault and arresting and jailing and some looting by the police while you are away   (courthousenews.com) divider line 30
    More: Scary  
•       •       •

14052 clicks; posted to Main » on 04 Jul 2013 at 5:03 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-07-04 02:40:04 PM
9 votes:
Some paid time off should show them.
2013-07-04 05:24:23 PM
3 votes:
Land of the free...


/not so much anymore.
//you guys are totally farked.
///NSA! NSA! er... USA!
2013-07-04 05:21:25 PM
3 votes:

cornfedokie: Clearly they were Wonton Criminals. I mean If they had nothing to Hide why didn't they Let the officers in their home and offer to cook them a fine hot meal as well.


3.bp.blogspot.com
2013-07-04 05:31:20 PM
2 votes:

Milo Minderbinder: Rincewind53: Jesus farking Christ.

They're right, that is a Third Amendment violation. Do you know how rare that is?

No, its not. Cops are not soldiers.


endthelie.com
2013-07-04 05:26:08 PM
2 votes:
He refused a police order. They put their lives on the line every day to protect him and protect his rights! That day was just not his turn. The ungrateful civilian is lucky to be alive . These cops are i.imgur.com .
2013-07-04 05:10:55 PM
2 votes:

halB: Marcus Aurelius: If even a fraction of this story is true, this entire police department is getting their asses sued off.

If the resulting judgement is enough to raise taxes, they might even suffer some consequences, like paid vacations and such.

Unless one of the officers was in a position to make policy, or they had done this a couple of times before and so there was an unwritten policy, this will be dismissed with prejudice.

There are very, very, very few ways to sue the police.  You think THIS is bad?  I find the fact that it's almost impossible to sue the police to be worse.


Interesting that you find it almost impossible to sue the police when replying about an article where someone is, you guessed it, suing the police.
2013-07-04 05:10:12 PM
2 votes:
i.imgur.com
2013-07-05 04:01:00 PM
1 votes:

TV's Vinnie: wambu: He refused a police order. They put their lives on the line every day to protect him and protect his rights! That day was just not his turn. The ungrateful civilian is lucky to be alive . These cops are [i.imgur.com image 54x11] .

You're the type who would have ratted out Anne Frank Helen Keller and her family in their hiding spot. You know that?


Pet peeve.
2013-07-05 02:48:55 PM
1 votes:

wambu: He refused a police order. They put their lives on the line every day to protect him and protect his rights! That day was just not his turn. The ungrateful civilian is lucky to be alive . These cops are [i.imgur.com image 54x11] .


You're the type who would have ratted out Anne Frank and her family in their hiding spot. You know that?
2013-07-04 07:54:53 PM
1 votes:

LrdPhoenix: Actually, empirically speaking, it was a great playbook.  Hitler did manage to rebuild the German economy and manufacturing capabilities from one of the worst conditions in the history of any country in the world to the point that it could compete on a global scale, and then very, very nearly used that to conquer the world, in only just a decade or so.

It's kinda like the lowest rated football team with 0 wins getting a new coach who manages to take them to the Superbowl which they only lose by 1 point.


Except for the 48,231,700 people who just wanted to watch the game with a beer and a hot dog, yeah.  User application error in module humanity.  System rebooted.
2013-07-04 06:55:22 PM
1 votes:

HempHead: AngryDragon: Dear American Government,

THIS IS NOT A PLAYBOOK.

[upload.wikimedia.org image 200x310]

Actually it is, Hitler laid out his complete strategy and followed it.


OK, so empirically speaking, it wasn't a good playbook?
2013-07-04 06:39:35 PM
1 votes:
One of my dreams is to have a homeowner shoots and seriously injures a police officer who illegally entered into the home, and the courts rule that the shooting was justified.
2013-07-04 06:21:36 PM
1 votes:

WickerNipple: eventhelosers:   Plaintiff could have helped the cops out but the point is he had a right to be an ahole and not let them in.

??? Refusing to let the cops in your house does NOT make you an ahole.


In my opinion if your neighbor is beating the old lady or whatevs (my comprehension) and you won't help then it does, but you have that right.  God Bless America.  I'm atheist and all just sayin
2013-07-04 05:53:13 PM
1 votes:
Paid Administrative Leave for EVERYONE!!!!
2013-07-04 05:40:39 PM
1 votes:

hardinparamedic: wambu: Walks like a duck.
Dresses like a duck.
Has weapons like a duck.
F**ks up your duck with pepperballs.

It's a duck.

What apparantly constitutes the Military in your mind:

[ionenewsone.files.wordpress.com image 640x380] 
[media.npr.org image 850x637]
[www.veteranstoday.com image 370x278]



One (a police officer) has essential immunity from prosecution. The others are rednecks and you can shoot them at will.
2013-07-04 05:32:00 PM
1 votes:

eventhelosers: Milo Minderbinder: Rincewind53: Jesus farking Christ.

They're right, that is a Third Amendment violation. Do you know how rare that is?

No, its not. Cops are not soldiers.

[endthelie.com image 850x637]


IT'S SPELLED DIFFERENT!1!!1!
2013-07-04 05:31:34 PM
1 votes:

wambu: He refused a police order. They put their lives on the line every day to protect him and protect his rights! That day was just not his turn. The ungrateful civilian is lucky to be alive . These cops are [i.imgur.com image 54x11] .


8/10 would troll again!
2013-07-04 05:31:11 PM
1 votes:

OgreMagi: hardinparamedic: OgreMagi: They violated both the 3rd

No, they did not. There is NO Third Amendment Violation here, as the police are NOT considered under constitutional jurisprudence as members of the United States Military OR a State National Guard or Militia under the command of a Federal military commander.

Instead, it's a slam dunk for a fourth, and a fifth amendment violation of their rights.

If they aren't military, they need to stop looking and acting like military.  Until that happens, they are military.


Walks like a duck.
Dresses like a duck.
Has weapons like a duck.
F**ks up your duck with pepperballs.

It's a duck.
2013-07-04 05:30:16 PM
1 votes:

A Shambling Mound: And anyone that didn't protest the orders to storm this guy's house, doubly so.


But zey were only follovink orderrs.

www.addictinginfo.org

Godwin's pithy remark is not actually a law.  It was a pithy remark.  Deal.
2013-07-04 05:27:44 PM
1 votes:

wambu: He refused a police order. They put their lives on the line every day to protect him and protect his rights! That day was just not his turn. The ungrateful civilian is lucky to be alive . These cops are [i.imgur.com image 54x11] .


+2 for carefully crafted irony.
2013-07-04 05:23:07 PM
1 votes:
Happy Fourth of July, suckers.
2013-07-04 05:20:00 PM
1 votes:

m00: So the cops did all this to gain a command post for a domestic violence case? Really? Something's fishy here.


Cops have the same attitude as those pitbulls that attempt to eat a porcupine.
2013-07-04 05:17:03 PM
1 votes:

Fluid: The Third Amendment says "no soldier" rather than "no policeman", though.


And they call "ladies of the evening" crack whores now.  Semantics change.
2013-07-04 05:13:49 PM
1 votes:

halB: Marcus Aurelius: If even a fraction of this story is true, this entire police department is getting their asses sued off.

If the resulting judgement is enough to raise taxes, they might even suffer some consequences, like paid vacations and such.

Unless one of the officers was in a position to make policy, or they had done this a couple of times before and so there was an unwritten policy, this will be dismissed with prejudice.

There are very, very, very few ways to sue the police.  You think THIS is bad?  I find the fact that it's almost impossible to sue the police to be worse.


The police are in violation of 18 US 241 and 18 US 242.  Basically, civil rights violations with conspiracy thrown in.  They violated both the 3rd and 4th amendments.

The law needs to be changed so that when a cop (or anyone in a position of authority) blatantly and knowingly breaks the law, they can be held personally liable and their pension is not immune.  Let's see how quickly the cops start paying attention to the Constitution when that happens.

/Yes, I know, never going to happen.
2013-07-04 05:11:17 PM
1 votes:
Fark Cop Apologists to blame the homeowner in 5... 4... 3...
2013-07-04 05:10:42 PM
1 votes:
So far, our government has thoroughly trashed all the Constitutional Amendments but the Third.

Now they're gunning for that one too! Let no Amendment remain untrashed.
2013-07-04 05:09:42 PM
1 votes:
Honestly, I'm surprised they didn't kill the dog.
2013-07-04 04:46:33 PM
1 votes:
What's all this then?
2013-07-04 04:12:07 PM
1 votes:
USA! USA! USA!
2013-07-04 03:56:09 PM
1 votes:
If even a fraction of this story is true, this entire police department is getting their asses sued off.

If the resulting judgement is enough to raise taxes, they might even suffer some consequences, like paid vacations and such.
 
Displayed 30 of 30 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report