If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Sun News Network)   Man says the Nazi flag outside his home is anti-Obama and not anti-Jewish and "didn't realize people would take it as offensive"   (sunnewsnetwork.ca) divider line 333
    More: Stupid, President Obama, Nazis, Jewish, Nazi flag, totalitarian state  
•       •       •

9559 clicks; posted to Main » on 29 Jun 2013 at 5:16 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



333 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-06-29 09:34:59 PM

JAGChem82: You know, one thing that these "flag fetishist" will harp on is this rigamarole about "it's about heritage not hate" and "I'm about respecting my ancestors", etc. But the moment someone flys a flag that offends their sensibilities, such as a gay flag, Mexican flag, et. al., they cry to the media how those people are dissin' America.

I'll give them this though, they were trolling people before there was even a concept of trolling in general. I'm a big proponent of targeted trolling myself. Next February, I should put out a resolution to fly a black nationalist flag to the state capitol in ATL.



I find it sort of funny when people who have no connection to the South masturbate over the Confederate flag and find it weird that people might view it as a sign of racism.

I have a cousin that used to fly a big flag off the back of his truck and he has pulled the whole heritage schtick-- he has spent his whole life in South Texas, near the Texas-Mexico border, not what I'd consider connected much to "The South", and none of the family has connection either.

The liberal sprinkling of racial and homophobic slurs throughout conversation doesn't really help, either.
 
2013-06-29 09:35:10 PM

skullkrusher: yeah, I like when people get beaten to a pulp for expressing a political opinion too


The First Amendment says the Government can't come beat you to a pulp.

It says nothing about World War II Veterans who saw their childhood friends and buddies blown up in front of them fighting the very ideals and fascism that flag stands for, and that man is exalting.

Seriously. fark Skinheads, and these people who think they're the master race. I have the same ire and disdain for them as I do Child Rapists and people who think Natural Light is a gormet drink.
 
2013-06-29 09:41:02 PM

hardinparamedic: skullkrusher: yeah, I like when people get beaten to a pulp for expressing a political opinion too

The First Amendment says the Government can't come beat you to a pulp.

It says nothing about World War II Veterans who saw their childhood friends and buddies blown up in front of them fighting the very ideals and fascism that flag stands for, and that man is exalting.

Seriously. fark Skinheads, and these people who think they're the master race. I have the same ire and disdain for them as I do Child Rapists and people who think Natural Light is a gormet drink.


I didn't mention the First Amendment. I just don't find violence an appealing response to political opinions you don't like.
I really don't think this guy is flying the flag because he is a skinhead.
 
2013-06-29 09:45:44 PM

skullkrusher: yeah, I like when people get beaten to a pulp for expressing a political opinion too


Is this the type of mental retardation and/or trolling you want to do?  Really?  Defending Nazis?  That's what your life has come to?
 
2013-06-29 09:46:29 PM

BarkingUnicorn: I'm a bit fuzzy on the Flag Code.  Are those flags hanging in the proper order, with foreign flags to the right of Old Glory as one looks at them?  I suppose they are if we're supposed to "read" flags left to right.


whats the grammar nazi equivalent for flag codes?
 
2013-06-29 09:49:26 PM

Paris1127: FromAnother article:

The Nazi swastika banner is joined by three other flags: Old Glory, the flag of Vatican City and the flag of the U.S. Marine Corps, of which Sincavage was a member in the 1950s. He's also been known to fly the Confederate battle flag, the stars and bars.

"My dad was a Marine during the war and he helped to defeat the Nazis," Sincavage said.

 Time traveling Nazis? Also, why doesn't the Confederate flag surprise me?

AND

"I don't like some things he's done,'' the registered Democrat said. "He told the Russians all the details of the British nuclear arsenal, down to the serial numbers."

Wat.


Not to suggest the guy is in touch with reality, but...

He said that his Marine dad fought the Nazis and that he himself was a Marine in the 1950s. So he's not suggesting time-traveling Nazis. However, it's unlikely that his father fought the Nazis as very few Marines served in the European theater. A few were attached to Atlantic naval vessels and a limited number saw action in North Africa, but the vast majority of WWII Marines served exclusively in the Pacific.
 
2013-06-29 09:59:22 PM

Satanic_Hamster: skullkrusher: yeah, I like when people get beaten to a pulp for expressing a political opinion too

Is this the type of mental retardation and/or trolling you want to do?  Really?  Defending Nazis?  That's what your life has come to?


Anyone who understand the right to free speech will side with skullkrusher here.  I may think that a particular statement is wrong or offensive, but I will fight to the death to defend your right to be absolutely farking wrong.  I will then exercise MY right to free speech to call you a farking idiot.
 
2013-06-29 10:07:07 PM
upload.wikimedia.org

What an actual Anti-Obama flag may look like.

Seriously though, does it even matter? Flying a Nazi flag against your black president is clearly a racist concept. This may be one of the few times where the 'Cry racism at the drop of a hat' crowd could actually cry for a legitimate reason. Having established that, it doesn't actually matter which group you decided to be "against" with your Nazi flag.
 
2013-06-29 10:08:32 PM

Stile4aly: PsyLord: I guess he did nazi that coming.

/obligatory

He's Goering to get in a lot of trouble.


An attention hog just Goebbels up the publicity.
 
2013-06-29 10:10:22 PM

Rhino_man: Anyone who understand the right to free speech will side with skullkrusher here.  I may think that a particular statement is wrong or offensive, but I will fight to the death to defend your right to be absolutely farking wrong.  I will then exercise MY right to free speech to call you a farking idiot.


I'm not advocating what he does be made illegal.

I'm advocating everyone in his life tell him what a piece of shiat he is.  Then burn the flag and the house if he puts up another.
 
2013-06-29 10:13:51 PM
Anyone this dense deserves to get his ass royally kicked. Dont care how old or demented he is
 
2013-06-29 10:15:16 PM

HotWingConspiracy: In teabag land, black people are nazi's.


Not since the enactment of the 13th Amendment.
 
2013-06-29 10:19:50 PM

relcec: Hobodeluxe: relcec: cptjeff: knowless:

Do you think I'm racist because i don't like Obama murdering brown children with flying death robots?

Were you complaining when Busk was killing 10 times as many with 500 pound bombs?

The outrage over drones is really, really stupid. Yes, there are civilian casualties. But the tactics that drones replaced resulted in orders of magnitudes more civilians killed. Or did you think that cruise missiles and conventional air raids didn't kill children?

yes, a 50 to 1 civilian to terrorist kill ratio that has killed thousands of innocent civilians and created probably tens of thousands if not millions of people that didn't like us much before but now hate us with the fire of one thousand suns is really really stupid to be outraged about.
I mean what are our choices, b-52s or a half dozen drone strikes a week? there couldn't possibly be any other answer, right? I mean if the new nice smart guy with white hat on in the white house says this is good it's good?
http://www.policymic.com/articles/16949/predator-drone-strikes-50-ci vi lians-are-killed-for-every-1-terrorist-and-the-cia-only-wants-to-up-dr one-warfare

you realize that figure is derived from Afghani press reports right?

holy shiat, you mean you mean they Mujahideen press has infiltrated the nytimes and even columbia university! you must really really be terrified now. I'm actually surprised you manage to leave your house what with your entire world filled with militant towel heads that want to kill you for being free.

http://web.law.columbia.edu/human-rights-institute/counterterrorism/ dr one-strikes/counting-drone-strike-deaths
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/17/opinion/17exum.html?_r=2&;


the NYT editorial page that cited a right wing think tank that cited the Afghani press as their source
and you really should read the summary in the columbia report. they were 2300 percent higher than others who were doing the counting. because they relied on ,,,,,Afghani and Pakistani press reports.
Do you really think columbia has actual boots on the ground wandering around in Waziristan doing body counts and identification?    Do you think they go into a village and ask "was this guy a terrorist?" and get reliable info?
 
2013-06-29 10:20:35 PM
In another couple years you (probably) won't have a black president anymore. I'm sure you can survive until then.
 
2013-06-29 10:21:38 PM
Did he finish the interview by doing the Bavarian Hop-Clop on his driveway?
 
2013-06-29 10:30:27 PM
I took a bicycle tour a while back that had me pedaling through the Texas panhandle. In Wheeler, Texas I camped in an old mans yard, next to the shack he built for himself to live in. He was a simple man, not filled with hate or anger; had never been out of the region. The next day he gave me a 60 mile ride. Along the way we passed many cattle ranches. Breaking a long silence he said in his rural Texas drawl, "Everyone is raising these black angus cows nowadays, but I just hate it. I just hate looking out my window and seeing all these black cows."
I was sincerely curious as to why, so I asked him.
"Because it reminds me of Obama." I could not make this shiat up.
 
2013-06-29 10:32:49 PM

Crackpipe: I took a bicycle tour a while back that had me pedaling through the Texas panhandle. In Wheeler, Texas I camped in an old mans yard, next to the shack he built for himself to live in. He was a simple man, not filled with hate or anger; had never been out of the region. The next day he gave me a 60 mile ride. Along the way we passed many cattle ranches. Breaking a long silence he said in his rural Texas drawl, "Everyone is raising these black angus cows nowadays, but I just hate it. I just hate looking out my window and seeing all these black cows."
I was sincerely curious as to why, so I asked him.
"Because it reminds me of Obama." I could not make this shiat up.


because of Moochelle? I don't get it
 
2013-06-29 10:33:03 PM
How goddamned stupid do you have to be to not realize that flying the fuggin' NAZI flag might be offensive to...I dunno... EVERYBODY?!?!
 
2013-06-29 10:35:23 PM

eraser8: Is this guy just a nut?


Whoa now, slow down. Npbpdy is saying THAT. Let's hear the whole story first.

/So we can lauigh harder
 
2013-06-29 10:35:58 PM

eraser8: Is this guy just a nut?


He didn't think people would be offended by a Nazi flag... no kidding he is a nut.
 
2013-06-29 10:38:57 PM

skullkrusher: On Thursday, he reportedly ordered an Israeli flag, which he intends to fly alongside the Nazi one, "so Jewish people won't think I'm mad at them or anything like that."


Because a Jewish person walking down this guy's street upon seeing an Israeli flag *and* a Nazi flag flying side by side would just give a big ole thumbs up and continue to stroll on down the block?

[brilliant.jpg]

This guy's problem isn't with Obama, it's with reality.
 
2013-06-29 10:39:56 PM

BolshyGreatYarblocks: Stile4aly: PsyLord: I guess he did nazi that coming.

/obligatory

He's Goering to get in a lot of trouble.

An attention hog just Goebbels up the publicity.


I'm not one for Nazi puns, but when in Röhm...
 
2013-06-29 10:40:19 PM

quatchi: skullkrusher: On Thursday, he reportedly ordered an Israeli flag, which he intends to fly alongside the Nazi one, "so Jewish people won't think I'm mad at them or anything like that."

Because a Jewish person walking down this guy's street upon seeing an Israeli flag *and* a Nazi flag flying side by side would just give a big ole thumbs up and continue to stroll on down the block?

[brilliant.jpg]

This guy's problem isn't with Obama, it's with reality.


I would imagine it would cause more than a little bit of confusion
 
2013-06-29 10:43:26 PM

Craptastic: How goddamned stupid do you have to be to not realize that flying the fuggin' NAZI flag might be offensive to...I dunno... EVERYBODY?!?!


I think disillusioned folks like this expect their actions and reasonings to be met with "I know, right!?" and high fives, and when they're met with disgust and disdain they have to backpedal to, "Was that wrong? Should I not have done that?".
 
2013-06-29 10:44:58 PM
25.media.tumblr.com
/obligatory
 
2013-06-29 10:56:18 PM
Which flag did he fly when Bush and Cheney were in power?

/did Ghengis Khan have a flag?
 
2013-06-29 10:59:21 PM
In a move that has outraged Jewish residents of Judea and Samaria, a Nazi flag was waved over a Palestinian mosque near Hebron.

So the Palestinians were showing solidarity with the Jews and the Jews get upset?  I don't understand.  WTF is the world coming to?  The Palestinians make a friendly gesture and it gets thrown back in their face.
 
2013-06-29 11:02:55 PM

whatshisname: Which flag did he fly when Bush and Cheney were in power?

www.blackngoldgirls.com

 
2013-06-29 11:09:26 PM

whatshisname: Which flag did he fly when Bush and Cheney were in power?


No... see... he's not racist or anything... but he didn't have a problem with any of the stuff  they did.
 
2013-06-29 11:09:52 PM

skullkrusher: ummm it's trespass if he doesn't tell you that you ARE welcome. You do not have default permission to go on his property



Connecticut General Statutes 53a-107 - Criminal trespass in the first degree: Class A misdemeanor (a) A person is guilty of criminal trespass in the first degree when: (1) Knowing that such person is not licensed or privileged to do so, such person enters or remains in a building or any other premises after an order to leave or not to enter personally communicated to such person by the owner of the premises or other authorized person; or (2) such person enters or remains in a building or any other premises in violation of a restraining order issued pursuant to section 46b-15 or a protective order issued pursuant to section 46b-38c, 54-1k or 54-82r by the Superior Court; or (3) such person enters or remains in a building or any other premises in violation of a foreign order of protection, as defined in section 46b-15a, that has been issued against such person in a case involving the use, attempted use or threatened use of physical force against another person; or (4) knowing that such person is not licensed or privileged to do so, such person enters or remains on public land after an order to leave or not to enter personally communicated to such person by an authorized official of the state or a municipality, as the case may be.

      (b) Criminal trespass in the first degree is a class A misdemeanor.
 
2013-06-29 11:13:27 PM
I'm more concerned for Sincavage. Flying a swastika to protest foreign policy towards Israel, sounds like he was either very poorly educated or has some form of dementia. Perhaps a mix of both
 
2013-06-29 11:13:58 PM
As if I didn't have enough reasons to be stabby

/Listening to penis envy
//you can't explain that!
 
2013-06-29 11:28:04 PM

Paris1127: BolshyGreatYarblocks: Stile4aly: PsyLord: I guess he did nazi that coming.

/obligatory

He's Goering to get in a lot of trouble.

An attention hog just Goebbels up the publicity.

I'm not one for Nazi puns, but when in Röhm...


But Eicke see how some people might have a problem with this.
 
2013-06-29 11:29:51 PM

Philip Francis Queeg: skullkrusher: ummm it's trespass if he doesn't tell you that you ARE welcome. You do not have default permission to go on his property


Connecticut General Statutes 53a-107 - Criminal trespass in the first degree: Class A misdemeanor (a) A person is guilty of criminal trespass in the first degree when: (1) Knowing that such person is not licensed or privileged to do so, such person enters or remains in a building or any other premises after an order to leave or not to enter personally communicated to such person by the owner of the premises or other authorized person; or (2) such person enters or remains in a building or any other premises in violation of a restraining order issued pursuant to section 46b-15 or a protective order issued pursuant to section 46b-38c, 54-1k or 54-82r by the Superior Court; or (3) such person enters or remains in a building or any other premises in violation of a foreign order of protection, as defined in section 46b-15a, that has been issued against such person in a case involving the use, attempted use or threatened use of physical force against another person; or (4) knowing that such person is not licensed or privileged to do so, such person enters or remains on public land after an order to leave or not to enter personally communicated to such person by an authorized official of the state or a municipality, as the case may be.

      (b) Criminal trespass in the first degree is a class A misdemeanor.


(a) A person is guilty of criminal trespass in the second degree when, knowing that such person is not licensed or privileged to do so, (1) such person enters or remains in a building, or (2) such person enters or remains on public land.
      (b) Criminal trespass in the second degree is a class B misdemeanor.
 
2013-06-29 11:33:04 PM

skullkrusher: hardinparamedic: skullkrusher: why do you think that? Because he has crazy opinions about the current President and the current President is black? You got a pretty low bar set there

I'm not saying he's absolutely a racist, but flying the Nazi Flag is a very popular activity with skinhead racists.

Personally, I wish a group of WWII Veterans would see this, wig out, and beat him to a pulp like they did the real Nazis.

yeah, I like when people get beaten to a pulp for expressing a political opinion too


I like it when people get beaten to a pulp regardless.

DOWN GOES FRAZIER! DOWN GOES FRAZIER!
 
2013-06-29 11:34:54 PM

Gyrfalcon: skullkrusher: hardinparamedic: skullkrusher: why do you think that? Because he has crazy opinions about the current President and the current President is black? You got a pretty low bar set there

I'm not saying he's absolutely a racist, but flying the Nazi Flag is a very popular activity with skinhead racists.

Personally, I wish a group of WWII Veterans would see this, wig out, and beat him to a pulp like they did the real Nazis.

yeah, I like when people get beaten to a pulp for expressing a political opinion too

I like it when people get beaten to a pulp regardless.

DOWN GOES FRAZIER! DOWN GOES FRAZIER!


that's cuz you bloodthirsty
 
2013-06-29 11:39:21 PM

skullkrusher: Philip Francis Queeg: skullkrusher: ummm it's trespass if he doesn't tell you that you ARE welcome. You do not have default permission to go on his property


Connecticut General Statutes 53a-107 - Criminal trespass in the first degree: Class A misdemeanor (a) A person is guilty of criminal trespass in the first degree when: (1) Knowing that such person is not licensed or privileged to do so, such person enters or remains in a building or any other premises after an order to leave or not to enter personally communicated to such person by the owner of the premises or other authorized person; or (2) such person enters or remains in a building or any other premises in violation of a restraining order issued pursuant to section 46b-15 or a protective order issued pursuant to section 46b-38c, 54-1k or 54-82r by the Superior Court; or (3) such person enters or remains in a building or any other premises in violation of a foreign order of protection, as defined in section 46b-15a, that has been issued against such person in a case involving the use, attempted use or threatened use of physical force against another person; or (4) knowing that such person is not licensed or privileged to do so, such person enters or remains on public land after an order to leave or not to enter personally communicated to such person by an authorized official of the state or a municipality, as the case may be.

      (b) Criminal trespass in the first degree is a class A misdemeanor.

(a) A person is guilty of criminal trespass in the second degree when, knowing that such person is not licensed or privileged to do so, (1) such person enters or remains in a building, or (2) such person enters or remains on public land.
      (b) Criminal trespass in the second degree is a class B misdemeanor.


knowing being the key word. There must be some form of notice. The girl scout who comes to your door selling cookies is not a criminal if she has nit received permission before hand.

How many different property owners property have you been on today? How many gave you permission beforehand?
 
2013-06-29 11:39:30 PM

Churchill2004: [s22.postimg.org image 478x640]

Seen in Arkansas.

/at least no swastikas


....is he....like....a flag salesman?
 
2013-06-29 11:42:01 PM

Philip Francis Queeg: skullkrusher: Philip Francis Queeg: skullkrusher: ummm it's trespass if he doesn't tell you that you ARE welcome. You do not have default permission to go on his property


Connecticut General Statutes 53a-107 - Criminal trespass in the first degree: Class A misdemeanor (a) A person is guilty of criminal trespass in the first degree when: (1) Knowing that such person is not licensed or privileged to do so, such person enters or remains in a building or any other premises after an order to leave or not to enter personally communicated to such person by the owner of the premises or other authorized person; or (2) such person enters or remains in a building or any other premises in violation of a restraining order issued pursuant to section 46b-15 or a protective order issued pursuant to section 46b-38c, 54-1k or 54-82r by the Superior Court; or (3) such person enters or remains in a building or any other premises in violation of a foreign order of protection, as defined in section 46b-15a, that has been issued against such person in a case involving the use, attempted use or threatened use of physical force against another person; or (4) knowing that such person is not licensed or privileged to do so, such person enters or remains on public land after an order to leave or not to enter personally communicated to such person by an authorized official of the state or a municipality, as the case may be.

      (b) Criminal trespass in the first degree is a class A misdemeanor.

(a) A person is guilty of criminal trespass in the second degree when, knowing that such person is not licensed or privileged to do so, (1) such person enters or remains in a building, or (2) such person enters or remains on public land.
      (b) Criminal trespass in the second degree is a class B misdemeanor.

knowing being the key word. There must be some form of notice. The girl scout who comes to your door selling cookies is not a criminal if she has nit received permission before hand.

How m ...


A reasonable person knows that he is not permitted to climb the front of someone's house to remove a flag. There doesn't have to be a sign which says "Don't climb my house and steal my flag".
 
2013-06-29 11:46:55 PM

Gyrfalcon: cptjeff: knowless:

Do you think I'm racist because i don't like Obama murdering brown children with flying death robots?

Were you complaining when Busk was killing 10 times as many with 500 pound bombs?

The outrage over drones is really, really stupid. Yes, there are civilian casualties. But the tactics that drones replaced resulted in orders of magnitudes more civilians killed. Or did you think that cruise missiles and conventional air raids didn't kill children?

Evidently  people were under the impression that WAR didn't kill civilians until very recently.


War doesn't kill civilians, they're merely collaterally damaged. You know, sorta like shop soiled or damaged goods.
 
2013-06-29 11:51:56 PM
 
2013-06-29 11:54:16 PM

Paris1127: FromAnother article:

The Nazi swastika banner is joined by three other flags: Old Glory, the flag of Vatican City and the flag of the U.S. Marine Corps, of which Sincavage was a member in the 1950s. He's also been known to fly the Confederate battle flag, the stars and bars.

"My dad was a Marine during the war and he helped to defeat the Nazis," Sincavage said.

 Time traveling Nazis? Also, why doesn't the Confederate flag surprise me?


 Time traveling Nazis working with Confederates?
amazingstoriesmag.com
It's more likely than you think.
 
2013-06-29 11:56:34 PM

skullkrusher: A reasonable person knows that he is not permitted to climb the front of someone's house to remove a flag. There doesn't have to be a sign which says "Don't climb my house and steal my flag".


That's an an entirely different proposition than your original, erroneous, statement.  In the case that someone climbed the house, and stole the flag, while there are multiple crimes they might be charged with, trespassing is not going to be one of them unless some form of notice had been given that the person was unwelcome to enter the property.
 
2013-06-29 11:58:36 PM

cloakandbadger: In another couple years you (probably) won't have a black president anymore. I'm sure you can survive until then.


He's not going to like the atheist lesbian president, either.
 
2013-06-29 11:58:55 PM

Philip Francis Queeg: skullkrusher: A reasonable person knows that he is not permitted to climb the front of someone's house to remove a flag. There doesn't have to be a sign which says "Don't climb my house and steal my flag".

That's an an entirely different proposition than your original, erroneous, statement.  In the case that someone climbed the house, and stole the flag, while there are multiple crimes they might be charged with, trespassing is not going to be one of them unless some form of notice had been given that the person was unwelcome to enter the property.


the discussion was whether a person needs to be explicitly told they are not welcome to enter the property. To meet your dishonest requirement of first degree trespassing, that is the case. It is NOT the case for second degree trespassing and certainly not the case for illegally entering a property with intent to damage or steal property.
 
2013-06-30 12:01:24 AM

Riotboy: [25.media.tumblr.com image 310x255]
/obligatory


images2.wikia.nocookie.net
One thing about living in Illinois I never could stomach, all the damn Nazis.
 
2013-06-30 12:02:52 AM

Paris1127: "I don't like some things he's done,'' the registered Democrat said. "He told the Russians all the details of the British nuclear arsenal, down to the serial numbers."

Wat.


This is what happens when you give nut jobs a computer and access to the internet. They write crazy shiat and post it, then other nutjobs read it and start spouting it off as fact.
 
2013-06-30 12:05:15 AM

whatshisname: Which flag did he fly when Bush and Cheney were in power?

/did Ghengis Khan have a flag?


upload.wikimedia.org
A banner made of horsetails was the Mongol equivalent.
 
2013-06-30 12:08:44 AM

skullkrusher: Philip Francis Queeg: skullkrusher: A reasonable person knows that he is not permitted to climb the front of someone's house to remove a flag. There doesn't have to be a sign which says "Don't climb my house and steal my flag".

That's an an entirely different proposition than your original, erroneous, statement.  In the case that someone climbed the house, and stole the flag, while there are multiple crimes they might be charged with, trespassing is not going to be one of them unless some form of notice had been given that the person was unwelcome to enter the property.

the discussion was whether a person needs to be explicitly told they are not welcome to enter the property. To meet your dishonest requirement of first degree trespassing, that is the case. It is NOT the case for second degree trespassing and certainly not the case for illegally entering a property with intent to damage or steal property.


The legal definition of trespassing requires some form of notification. You clearly did not understand that when you made your original, erroneous statement.; Any reasonable person knows they are not breaking the law when multiple times each and every day they enter a piece of property they do not own without being told they are welcome beforehand, as you originally stated.

Damaging and stealing property is covered under separate provisions of the law.
 
2013-06-30 12:30:08 AM

ongbok: Paris1127: "I don't like some things he's done,'' the registered Democrat said. "He told the Russians all the details of the British nuclear arsenal, down to the serial numbers."

Wat.

This is what happens when you give nut jobs a computer and access to the internet. They write crazy shiat and post it, then other nutjobs read it and start spouting it off as fact.


More on this "scandal." Spoiler alert: it's not one. He likely read about it in the National Review, which based its article off of one in the Daily Telegraph, which took its info from---wait for it---Wikileaks.
 
Displayed 50 of 333 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report