Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CNN) NewsFlash The Supreme Court ensures our next president will be Lynyrd Skynyrd   (cnn.com ) divider line
    More: NewsFlash, Voting Rights Act, supreme courts  
•       •       •

28202 clicks; posted to Main » on 25 Jun 2013 at 10:37 AM (3 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»


Want to get NewsFlash notifications in email?

Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2013-06-25 10:42:14 AM  
8 votes:
Discrimination don't exist round these parts no more, yessir! What, that stars and bars on our state flag? Sheeeeeeet son, that's about HERITAGE. Now go ahead an pay this here heritage tax and the vote booth's over yonder.
2013-06-25 10:39:36 AM  
8 votes:
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of FREEBIRD!!
2013-06-25 10:39:27 AM  
7 votes:
Sam Alito's opinion merely read "butter".
2013-06-25 10:45:08 AM  
6 votes:
I sometimes doubt the courts commitment to Sparkle Motion.
2013-06-25 10:42:17 AM  
6 votes:

drew46n2: Is this about Paula Deen?


The Supreme Court just ruled that Paula Deen doesn't actually exist.
2013-06-25 11:44:44 AM  
5 votes:
hasty ambush: www.survivalandbeyond.net

Cuyahoga county, Ohio, 2012 election results;Registered voters 927,996Votes Cast 617,141Votes for Barack Obama 420,953Votes for Mitt Romney 184,475
Teatards generally lack several basic intellectual tools that would otherwise distinguish them from monkeys. This is why I no longer view them as even fully human, and I am a farking Republican.
2013-06-25 11:02:48 AM  
5 votes:
FREEBIRD AT LAST, FREEBIRD AT LAST, THANK GOD ALMIGHTY...
2013-06-25 10:44:49 AM  
5 votes:
encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com
2013-06-25 10:44:12 AM  
5 votes:
taxandspend:

beta.images.theglobeandmail.com

Accidentally Approves


/FTFY
2013-06-25 10:41:11 AM  
5 votes:
A gym teacher couldn't be any worse than a senile old movie actor.
2013-06-25 10:39:39 AM  
5 votes:
A high school gym coach? We could do worse
2013-06-25 10:51:25 AM  
4 votes:

To The Escape Zeppelin!: Lexx: Basically, the deep south can now enact laws which restrict voter eligibility, and they don't have to clear these laws before-hand with the feds.

But North Dakota could pass the same law and not have to clear it with the feds before hand. I understand the reason but to single out the South doesn't make a huge amount of sense and was begging to be declared unconstitutional.


Since when does the south has a problem with having one set of rules for one group and a different set of rules for another?
2013-06-25 10:39:52 AM  
4 votes:
Is this about Paula Deen?
2013-06-25 10:59:13 AM  
3 votes:

Lionel Mandrake: Well, it's not like people are still trying to make it difficult for some segments of the population to vote, amirite?


Oh, I'd say three-fifths of the population at most will face some difficulty voting as a result.
2013-06-25 10:44:45 AM  
3 votes:
www.raizlabs.com
Has socialized medicine and now better voting rights than a red-stater.
2013-06-25 10:43:08 AM  
3 votes:

Hobodeluxe: I see your true colors shining through


That's Cyndi Lauper, not Skynyrd.
2013-06-25 12:51:20 PM  
2 votes:
www.reactiongifs.com
2013-06-25 11:25:04 AM  
2 votes:
EyeballKid:

www.raizlabs.com
Has socialized medicine and now better voting rights than a red-stater.

img.pandawhale.com

2013-06-25 11:18:42 AM  
2 votes:

Kangaroo_Ralph: Only taxpayers should be allowed to vote.


www.vibe.com
"Tax-dodging deadbeats are people, my friend."
2013-06-25 11:15:37 AM  
2 votes:

DamnYankees: That's fine. They cited an opinion written by themselves, basically.


As opposed an opinion written by whom? God? Starfleet Command?
2013-06-25 11:14:48 AM  
2 votes:
I don't think this is a big deal, I mean, its not like one political party is actively trying to suppress minority votes, right?
2013-06-25 11:12:56 AM  
2 votes:
FINALLY the SCOTUS is opening the doors to privatize our elections process by removing all the pesky "fairness" that was in the way.
2013-06-25 11:07:43 AM  
2 votes:
happy with the result:
www.mainjustice.com
2013-06-25 11:07:11 AM  
2 votes:
Well, it certainly won't be Neil Young.
2013-06-25 11:01:12 AM  
2 votes:
I'll be writing my congresswoman, Molly Hatchet.
2013-06-25 10:57:49 AM  
2 votes:
It's a well thought out, educated ruling, and it completely lacks common sense.
2013-06-25 10:57:36 AM  
2 votes:
Oh noes, it's a bad day for the Farxists!
2013-06-25 10:52:10 AM  
2 votes:

Lucky LaRue: skullkrusher: Hobodeluxe: I see your true colors shining through

That's Cyndi Lauper, not Skynyrd.

Like there's a difference..


One looks like they were in a horrific plane wreck and the other is Skynyrd.
2013-06-25 10:51:17 AM  
2 votes:

skullkrusher: Hobodeluxe: I see your true colors shining through

That's Cyndi Lauper, not Skynyrd.


Like there's a difference..
2013-06-25 10:47:19 AM  
2 votes:

MCStymie: Have to wonder what a Skynyrd cover of "True Colors" would sound like, though.


No, you don't. It's Lynyrd Skynyrd. Ergo, it would be shiat.
2013-06-25 10:46:30 AM  
2 votes:

To The Escape Zeppelin!: Lexx: Basically, the deep south can now enact laws which restrict voter eligibility, and they don't have to clear these laws before-hand with the feds.

But North Dakota could pass the same law and not have to clear it with the feds before hand. I understand the reason but to single out the South doesn't make a huge amount of sense and was begging to be declared unconstitutional.


Unless you studied 3rd grade history or have a memory that goes back 40 years, I can see how this might not make sense.
2013-06-25 10:45:45 AM  
2 votes:

skullkrusher: Hobodeluxe: I see your true colors shining through

That's Cyndi Lauper, not Skynyrd.


Have to wonder what a Skynyrd cover of "True Colors" would sound like, though.
2013-06-25 10:45:11 AM  
2 votes:
And it will be pronounced 'Lĕh-'nérd 'Skin-'nérd
2013-06-25 10:43:21 AM  
2 votes:
Well, I guess now someone will have the chance to shout "PLAY FREEBIRD" at the inauguration and it may very well happen.
2013-06-25 10:43:01 AM  
2 votes:
I'd say we should shift to the popular vote, except that would mean we'd all have to grow neck beards and post to Reddit.
2013-06-25 10:41:14 AM  
2 votes:
But opponents of the provision counter that it should not be enforced in areas where it can be argued that racial discrimination no longer exists.

images.sodahead.com
2013-06-25 08:21:40 PM  
1 vote:
I thought the point of the court was to interpret laws, not strike them down because, yah know, congress was wrong.
2013-06-25 07:34:54 PM  
1 vote:

MyRandomName: Came for fark liberal idiocy, left satisfied.


We can certainly be satisfied that there was idiocy left after you came, yes.
2013-06-25 07:06:29 PM  
1 vote:
THIS JUST IN.... Obama proclaims Justice Thomas henceforth shall be named Justice "Uncle" Thomas..

/Hey, where the white women at?
2013-06-25 06:44:38 PM  
1 vote:
Remember Mike Turzai?

i.imgur.com
2013-06-25 05:42:45 PM  
1 vote:
Looks like the Supreme Court violated the Separation of Powers today.  If only there was some body that could ajudicate that.
2013-06-25 04:15:10 PM  
1 vote:
i208.photobucket.com
2013-06-25 03:40:28 PM  
1 vote:

Biological Ali: Alonjar: "Uncle Tom" is what you're looking for. Tom/Thomas.

/Wow, fark is really white.....

Isn't "Uncle Tom" just a polite (using the term loosely) way of saying "house n*gger"?


it's the polite way we refer to my biological uncle's "roommate".
2013-06-25 03:34:38 PM  
1 vote:

Alphax: R.A.Danny: Now it is up to Congress to pass a law that can pass Constitutional muster.

This really is how it is supposed to work.

If there was a fire in the Capitol Building, and there weren't enough senators there to override a filibuster, they'll all burn to death.


You say that like it's a bad thing.
2013-06-25 03:07:53 PM  
1 vote:

MonoChango: d23: Thunderpipes: Can any Farker here point out a single recent example of minority voter suppression? Only cases I can think of are all against white folks.

Making stuff up to rig elections in your favor is silly.

There is no minority voter problems, has not been for decades. Quite the opposite in fact, as they can vote 6 times if they wish and get a slap on the wrist.

Maybe if they can get through the lines..

[msnbctv.files.wordpress.com image 400x280]

Seriously.. if you really believe that then you must be living in a major bubble of only information you want to hear.  I'd like to see ONE example brought forward of a minority voters voting a half dozen times... just ONE.

Not Quite 6 times but, voter fraud is voter fraud.


You really want to cite Faux News as a source?!?

Can I make citations using Calvin & Hobbes?
2013-06-25 02:01:02 PM  
1 vote:

MCStymie: skullkrusher: Hobodeluxe: I see your true colors shining through

That's Cyndi Lauper, not Skynyrd.

Have to wonder what a Skynyrd cover of "True Colors" would sound like, though.


Pure garbage-juice.
2013-06-25 01:38:56 PM  
1 vote:

cman: rewind2846: People my father's age marched a fought and died so that those after them could have the right to vote.
And now this supreme court has just sh*t on their entire lives, setting the clock back to 1965... again. Section four was put there for a purpose, and that purpose, as evidenced by the elections of 2008, 2010, and 2012, still exists. I would expect people like that asshole Roberts to vote against it, as if it were up to people like him grandfather clauses, poll taxes and literacy tests would have been standard procedure for exercising the vote long ago.

But for that house n****r Thomas, who of all people should know better, there is no excuse.
 F*ck him.

Dropping a "n" bomb on someone who is black is gonna be seen as racist. That might not be your intent, but that is what it is.


I thought he was talking about Thomas's frequent nagging.
2013-06-25 01:24:41 PM  
1 vote:
24.media.tumblr.com
2013-06-25 01:24:01 PM  
1 vote:

Kangaroo_Ralph: Only taxpayers should be allowed to vote.


Great idea! Since retired seniors don't pay payroll taxes and represent the largest section of those that pay no net income tax they'd be the largest group to lose the right to vote. Once the large numbers of seniors lose their right to vote progressive change will be much easier to accomplish. The GOP would be completely marginalized and the conservative movement utterly hamstrung since a big section of their base would lose the right to vote.
2013-06-25 01:16:39 PM  
1 vote:

Carth: is there anything stopping Congress from passing another law


Republicans.
2013-06-25 01:16:02 PM  
1 vote:
Maybe we could get two birds with one stone if we got donations together to hire Paula Deen as Scalia's personal chef for a while.
2013-06-25 01:10:23 PM  
1 vote:

pacified: can Scalia die already?


THIS please.  That lard ass can't have too many more years left in his condition.  Lets see if we can get him some gift cards to Jack In The Box or something to just hurry up the process.
2013-06-25 12:48:37 PM  
1 vote:
can Scalia die already?
2013-06-25 12:18:54 PM  
1 vote:

djh0101010: We'll even give you the ID for free.


On alternating third Thursdays of the month at an office hundreds of miles from where you live that's open for an hour.*

*Transportation not included, Additional fees may apply.  Offer void without required documentation.  Required documentation subject to change without notice.  Improper exclusion from voting may not be remedied after the fact.  It's got Paul Anka's guarantee (guarantee void in Tennessee).
2013-06-25 12:14:33 PM  
1 vote:

kronicfeld: DamnYankees: That's fine. They cited an opinion written by themselves, basically.

As opposed an opinion written by whom? God? Starfleet Command?


phillbarron.files.wordpress.com
What does God need with a Supreme Court decision?
2013-06-25 12:10:35 PM  
1 vote:

hasty ambush: [www.politifake.org image 640x456]


Voted six times for Obama in one election

[patdollard.com image 600x350]


[dancingczars.files.wordpress.com image 640x553]

[www.survivalandbeyond.net image 720x384]
[images.sodahead.com image 261x350]


10/10

You actually got about 5 separate people to spend their time looking up the actual election results.  Well done.
2013-06-25 12:05:20 PM  
1 vote:

DamnYankees: mattharvest: All laws have to, at least, meet Rational Basis scrutiny,

This is only true for equal protection cases. Go to law school.


Don't go to law school. Being able to argue these things knowledgeably in FARK threads isn't worth the trade-off of spending three years surrounded by law students to end up graduating into a shiatty job market with six figures of student loan debt.
2013-06-25 11:59:47 AM  
1 vote:
cdn.bleacherreport.net
2013-06-25 11:58:43 AM  
1 vote:

D135: Bottles of Jack and a fistful of cocaine for everyone!!


I'd vote for Romney if I got a bottle of Jack and a fistful of cocaine.
2013-06-25 11:57:51 AM  
1 vote:
pre or post fiery plane crash?
2013-06-25 11:51:12 AM  
1 vote:
hasty ambush:  posted this nonense

www.survivalandbeyond.net

----------------------

Sigh.

You know, the whole political process would work better if one side wasn't a pack of farking liars:

http://boe.cuyahogacounty.us/pdf_boe/en-US/ElectionResults2012/Nov20 12 /amended/11062012AmendedofficialResultsbyContest.HTM
2013-06-25 11:49:51 AM  
1 vote:

kronicfeld: To the echo chamber's credit, I haven't yet seen anyone here say that this is worse than Dred Scott.


This is worse than Dred Scott!

thumbs.anyclip.com
2013-06-25 11:37:47 AM  
1 vote:
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude

.Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.


SCOTUS: Fark it, we decide now.
2013-06-25 11:36:42 AM  
1 vote:

barneyfifesbullet: If you can show a photo ID to buy beer or rent a movie, you can show photo ID to vote for President of the United States. Stop whining.


So, voting is the same as buying beer or renting a video down there. Glad you Rebs take it so seriously. Kind of explains a lot of the smelly detritus you send to Congress.
2013-06-25 11:31:48 AM  
1 vote:

elchip: enik: Oh noes, it's a bad day for the Farxists!

[upload.wikimedia.org image 850x563]


You know, during WWII the Brits, French and the Germans, the farking conquered Germans, wondered what the hell was up with White MPs beating the shiat out of Black American soldiers. The British in particular simply could not understand, even with their own inherent racism, how Americans treated blacks so utterly poorly overseas. They regularly circumvented the discrimination bullshiat as well.

You know, I'm starting to think that the 1970s were pretty much the peak of American civilization. All we're doing now is seemingly regressing. I'll have a better answer after tomorrow.
2013-06-25 11:31:40 AM  
1 vote:

Thunderpipes: Can any Farker here point out a single recent example of minority voter suppression? Only cases I can think of are all against white folks.

Making stuff up to rig elections in your favor is silly.

There is no minority voter problems, has not been for decades. Quite the opposite in fact, as they can vote 6 times if they wish and get a slap on the wrist.


\citationneeded.jpg
\\imagined problem is imaginary
2013-06-25 11:31:18 AM  
1 vote:
xaf.xanga.com
2013-06-25 11:31:12 AM  
1 vote:
Everybody relax. I'm pretty sure a Southern rock band can't be president.
2013-06-25 11:28:44 AM  
1 vote:
This means slavery is legal again
2013-06-25 11:28:33 AM  
1 vote:

dv-ous: Does that mean that in Texas you can shoot your attorney for giving you bad advice?


Only if he tries to run away with it at night.
2013-06-25 11:28:26 AM  
1 vote:

vernonFL: Thunderpipes: Can any Farker here point out a single recent example of minority voter suppression? Only cases I can think of are all against white folks.

Making stuff up to rig elections in your favor is silly.

There is no minority voter problems, has not been for decades. Quite the opposite in fact, as they can vote 6 times if they wish and get a slap on the wrist.

Here is one.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/06/robert-ehrlich-paul-schuric k- voter-suppression_n_1131852.html

The guy was found guilty and sent to prison.


And how does this relate in any way to the court ruling? A lone bad apple, and there are plenty of Democrats doing it, has nothing to do with the ruling. The ruling means certain parts of the country will be allowed to make their own rules and have them challenged if need be, like everywhere else.

It quite simply, makes things fair.
2013-06-25 11:27:45 AM  
1 vote:
Finally the courts are recognizing the undue influence that minorities hold over the election process.
2013-06-25 11:27:18 AM  
1 vote:

wjllope: A high school gym coach? We could do worse


We did, a community organizer
2013-06-25 11:26:49 AM  
1 vote:
"racial stereotypes and discrimination don't exist anymore. people only think it does because colored people are all so whiny and entitled... can i still say uppity?" -justice alito
2013-06-25 11:25:43 AM  
1 vote:
http://www.fark.com/goto/7813730/http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/25/politic s/scotus-voting-rights/index.html?ooohthatsmell

wut
2013-06-25 11:24:05 AM  
1 vote:
www.politifake.org


Voted six times for Obama in one election

patdollard.com


dancingczars.files.wordpress.com

www.survivalandbeyond.net
images.sodahead.com
2013-06-25 11:23:10 AM  
1 vote:

To The Escape Zeppelin!: Lexx: Basically, the deep south can now enact laws which restrict voter eligibility, and they don't have to clear these laws before-hand with the feds.

But North Dakota could pass the same law and not have to clear it with the feds before hand. I understand the reason but to single out the South doesn't make a huge amount of sense and was begging to be declared unconstitutional.


But North Dakota doesn't have the deep history of racial discrimination and Jim Crow laws that that the south has.
2013-06-25 11:21:30 AM  
1 vote:

FLMountainMan: New York City, meanwhile, is the second-most segregated city in the country, has the greatest income divide, has cops regularly gunning down minorities regularly, yet its media outlets are proclaiming this Supreme Court decision as some sort of racial apocalypse.


Ehh... might be because I'm white and live in Queens, but I don't think "segregation" in NYC works the same as it does elsewhere. People may live in relatively homogenous communities, but for the most part everyone interacts with everyone else on the subways, buses, on the streets, at work, while shopping.  Granted, I may be somewhat myopic on the matter, as I live in what is thought to be the most ethnically diverse urban area in the world.
2013-06-25 11:19:29 AM  
1 vote:
Roberts said that formula from 1972 was outdated and unworkable.

Also, they took "All in the Family" off the air(waves)
2013-06-25 11:18:22 AM  
1 vote:
The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down a key part of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the map that determines which states must get federal permission before they change their voting laws.
Civil rights activists called the decision devastating, and a dissenting justice said it amounted to "demolition" of the law, widely considered the most important piece of civil rights legislation in American history.


www.heygidday.biz

Thanks again, SCOTUS. Bang-up job you're doing for the good of the country.
2013-06-25 11:17:07 AM  
1 vote:
Can any Farker here point out a single recent example of minority voter suppression? Only cases I can think of are all against white folks.

Making stuff up to rig elections in your favor is silly.

There is no minority voter problems, has not been for decades. Quite the opposite in fact, as they can vote 6 times if they wish and get a slap on the wrist.
2013-06-25 11:16:38 AM  
1 vote:

DamnYankees: Voiceofreason01: Because Congress or the State Governments never trample over individual rights?

What individual right was being trampled in this case? The right of politicians to change election laws without pre-clearance?


The right of racists to make sure Blah people don't vote.
2013-06-25 11:15:17 AM  
1 vote:

BravadoGT: Should have been 9-0.


Not a chance.  The racists I mean liberals need to keep the race issue alive so they can remain relevant.
2013-06-25 11:14:08 AM  
1 vote:
If we had a Democratic Congress, they'd pass something that covers all states.

Probably as an amendment to the Defense budget, but they'd pass something that covers all states.
2013-06-25 11:12:04 AM  
1 vote:
Yeah, the NSA scandal is no big deal, but this is. Okay.
2013-06-25 11:11:05 AM  
1 vote:
Yay for states rights. Now outlaw the goddamn black vote.
2013-06-25 11:10:24 AM  
1 vote:

enik: Oh noes, it's a bad day for the Farxists!


upload.wikimedia.org
2013-06-25 11:08:54 AM  
1 vote:

El_Perro: 98-0 in Senate
390-33 in House
. . .
5-4 in Supreme Court, too bad.


Boy those anti-judicial activism Republicans are going to PISSED!

Right?
2013-06-25 11:08:06 AM  
1 vote:
Next on the SCOTUS greatest hits, non-corporation people are declared 3/5ths of a vote.

Seriously... fark these guys.
2013-06-25 11:04:35 AM  
1 vote:
That'll teach black people to think they have rights in this country.
2013-06-25 11:01:39 AM  
1 vote:

Primitive Screwhead: But opponents of the provision counter that it should not be enforced in areas where it can be argued that racial discrimination no longer exists.


He's right, the south is totally different now.

www.metrocookinghouston.com
2013-06-25 11:01:29 AM  
1 vote:
Tells you how far to the left that the Supreme Court has moved when they're fighting over the interpretation of a "Voting Rights Act", implying that the average citizen deserves a vote, or rights.
2013-06-25 11:00:49 AM  
1 vote:
Gosh, this will make it tough for the Democrat candidate for President to get 100% of the vote in some precincts in 2016.
2013-06-25 10:58:30 AM  
1 vote:

DamnYankees: runin800m: I think it's unconstitutional because it was so selective. I wouldn't have a problem if it covered every state.

On what basis? What's the basis to rule that Congress can't make certain laws more applicable to area X than area Y? It is unconstitutional to pass a law relating to coastal flooding that only applies to coastal states?


Racists are a suspect class, so laws applying to them must pass strict scrutiny.
2013-06-25 10:56:53 AM  
1 vote:

globalwarmingpraiser: Rabid Badger Beaver Weasel: taxandspend:

[beta.images.theglobeandmail.com image 620x350]

Accidentally Approves


/FTFY

Man writes awkwardly worded song about people getting to know each other instead of judging. Gets accidentally branded a racist.


/FTFY2
2013-06-25 10:55:34 AM  
1 vote:
Ginsburg: "Throwing out preclearance... is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet."
2013-06-25 10:52:26 AM  
1 vote:
The Court has determined that the old formula for determing which states should have extra scrutiny is out of date, and has asked Congress to come up with a new one.  So once Congress does that, the Voting Rights Act can be enforced again.

/lol
2013-06-25 10:51:55 AM  
1 vote:

To The Escape Zeppelin!: My point was that racism and suppressing voting rights is not something limited to the South. If you really think it's a worthwhile law then it should be applied to the whole country.


Then appeal to Congress to do that. The court is simply substituting its judgment for Congress's here. It's the height of judicial activism.
2013-06-25 10:51:22 AM  
1 vote:

qorkfiend: bdub77: As someone who lives in NC, my general impression is that this country is really going down hill. This is not helping my feelings on the matter.

It's swiftly coming up on the time when I'm expected to have kids, and I'm seriously considering raising them somewhere other than the United States.


Too many Mexicans?
2013-06-25 10:50:10 AM  
1 vote:
FTFA "But opponents of the provision counter that it should not be enforced in areas where it can be argued that racial discrimination no longer exists."

Where is this bastion of tolerance and equality?
2013-06-25 10:47:29 AM  
1 vote:
Vote for Kang or Chodos either way your screwed.
2013-06-25 10:46:06 AM  
1 vote:

drew46n2: Discrimination don't exist round these parts no more, yessir! What, that stars and bars on our state flag? Sheeeeeeet son, that's about HERITAGE. Now go ahead an pay this here heritage tax and the vote booth's over yonder.


And yet, the South is the most integrated region of the country and elects the most black people to Congress.  But I'm sure that's entirely due to these laws.

New York City, meanwhile, is the second-most segregated city in the country, has the greatest income divide, has cops regularly gunning down minorities regularly, yet its media outlets are proclaiming this Supreme Court decision as some sort of racial apocalypse.
2013-06-25 10:45:41 AM  
1 vote:
Well, they don't call 'em the slave states for nothing.

This is a bigger threat to democracy than the NSA distraction.
2013-06-25 10:45:40 AM  
1 vote:
As someone who lives in NC, my general impression is that this country is really going down hill. This is not helping my feelings on the matter.
2013-06-25 10:45:21 AM  
1 vote:
After the provision was reauthorized by Congress in 2006 for another 25 years, counties in Alabama and North Carolina filed suit, saying the monitoring was burdensome and unwarranted.

your burdensome regulations impinge on our first  amendment right to be racists
2013-06-25 10:44:02 AM  
1 vote:
I'll shiat a brick, eat said shiatted brick, and then shiat said eaten brick before Congress passes another preclearance formula.
2013-06-25 10:42:55 AM  
1 vote:
If you live in a red state and you skin isn't white, enjoy voting suppression for the next few decades :(


I don't get it, this today, but they sent the affirmative action one back to lower courts? wtf
2013-06-25 10:41:30 AM  
1 vote:
well, it's not like the south was ever in play for democrats anyway.
2013-06-25 10:41:18 AM  
1 vote:

drew46n2: Is this about Paula Deen?


She gets to be VP now.
2013-06-25 10:40:23 AM  
1 vote:
fark you Kock Bros.
2013-06-25 10:40:02 AM  
1 vote:
I don't think he is running.
2013-06-25 10:39:53 AM  
1 vote:

Rev. Skarekroe: I don't get it.


Jim Crow is back baby!!
2013-06-25 10:39:17 AM  
1 vote:
I see your true colors shining through
 
Displayed 113 of 113 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report