If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Science Daily)   Now that cancer is cured, scientists are trying to make fuel out of air   (sciencedaily.com) divider line 4
    More: Unlikely, carbon dioxide, fossil fuels, Chemical Society, methanol, effective methods, print share, substrates, EurekAlert  
•       •       •

1762 clicks; posted to Geek » on 21 Jun 2013 at 1:38 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-06-21 04:48:13 AM
1 votes:
I know we all hate cancer, but really, free energy is much more important than curing cancer.

Not that this is free energy or anything.
2013-06-21 04:47:50 AM
1 votes:

HotWingAgenda: If you already have a source of pure hydrogen, you have fuel. This sounds like using a gas generator to run a windmill.


If you have hydrogen you have a fuel with very low energy density and which does not work with the current transportation infrastructure.  Converting it into methanol solves a couple problems if you can do it in a cost effective way.
2013-06-21 02:04:56 AM
1 votes:

StopLurkListen: You can create a fuel out of CO2 , but you're putting more energy into it than you're getting out of it.

2 CO2 + 4 H2O  + energy →   2 CH3OH + 3 O2


P.S. Which is fine in situations you want to store power. For example, batteries. You could think of this as a battery of sorts. It's just not a source of energy itself.
2013-06-21 12:25:07 AM
1 votes:
Unlikely?  You mean as unlikely as taking CO2 from the air and converting it to glucose?
 
Displayed 4 of 4 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report