Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Inquisitr)   Rush Limbaugh says gay people marrying will lead to acceptance of pedophilia and destroy 'traditional marriage'. None his four wives available for comment   (inquisitr.com) divider line 41
    More: Dumbass, Rush Limbaugh, same-sex marriages  
•       •       •

1017 clicks; posted to Politics » on 20 Jun 2013 at 1:48 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-06-20 02:13:41 PM  
5 votes:
Two gay people- Consenting adults.

Pedophilia- NON CONSENTING CHILD
Bestiality- NON CONSENTING ANIMAL


That's why liberals accept gay relationships and gay marriage and will always be opposed to pedophilia and bestiality.
2013-06-20 01:53:20 PM  
5 votes:

Aarontology: Man, why are all these anti-gay conservatives so obsessed with f*cking children?

It's like all they can think about. Two dudes holding hands and their minds go right to raping a child.


It's because they have just enough self-awareness to fear what they themselves would do in a a world where they were free to let up on their own breaks just a little bit. I honestly don't think you make a life (or certainly a career) out of being "conservative" on every goddamn issue unless you are repressing something about yourself that haunts you a great deal and you desperately need the weight of society to help you keep the monsters caged.
2013-06-20 01:54:59 PM  
4 votes:
Why is it the loudest defenders of "traditional marriage" are the ones with the most ex-wives?
2013-06-20 01:46:32 PM  
4 votes:
why can't this fat fark just die of a heart attack already.
2013-06-20 01:58:40 PM  
3 votes:

gshepnyc: Aarontology: Man, why are all these anti-gay conservatives so obsessed with f*cking children?

It's like all they can think about. Two dudes holding hands and their minds go right to raping a child.

It's because they have just enough self-awareness to fear what they themselves would do in a a world where they were free to let up on their own breaks just a little bit. I honestly don't think you make a life (or certainly a career) out of being "conservative" on every goddamn issue unless you are repressing something about yourself that haunts you a great deal and you desperately need the weight of society to help you keep the monsters caged.


That would be the same society that conservatives rail against because it takes away their Freedoms.

In other words, they want to be free to be monsters as long as no-one else can.
2013-06-20 11:43:51 PM  
2 votes:

Ed Grubermann: FTFA: There is a movement on to normalize pedophilia, and I guarantee you your reaction to that is probably much the same as your reaction when you first heard about gay marriage.

If by "much the same" you mean "completely the opposite", then yes.


The difference of course also being that the "movement on to normalize pedophilia" remains the same small group of perverts and deviates it was when it started; there is no groundswell of support for NAMBLA in the past 40 years like there was for gay rights. Nobody wants to make boy-loving legal like they wanted to make sex between consenting adults legal, and that, dear Rushbo, is the big difference between pedophilia and gay marriage.

There will never be a big acceptance of letting people do things to kids, no matter how much perverts like Rush desperately want there to be. Sorry.
2013-06-20 08:24:16 PM  
2 votes:

Latinwolf: May not be true today, but they do have some skeletons in their closet.


And that's the big difference between the gay community, and a moral authority like the Catholic Church.

The gay community rose up and expelled NAMBLA from its attempts to associate. The reason it's not true today is because gay people put an end to it.

The moral authority, on the other hand, moved its army of predators around and kept them hidden. The reason it's still true today is because the leadership didn't do a thing.
2013-06-20 03:08:06 PM  
2 votes:
Sure, we lose Gandolfini, but this fat useless fark stays alive.  Makes sense.

However if there are two things Rush Limbaugh knows about, and there are probably ONLY two, they are pedophilia and ruined marriages.
2013-06-20 02:55:08 PM  
2 votes:

ScreamingHangover: Cythraul: Gay people at Cornell? Seriously? That's your "LGBT community?"

I've never even heard of the Gay Liberation Front or the IL&GA.

Sounds like a community wide scandal to me.

Funny how you missed the New York City Gay Pride March . That's how I (and most) first heard of Nambla: back in the 80's, it was an annual event in the local news how various LGBT organizations were protesting their participation in the parade. Nonetheless, they were still sanctioned participants.

The article I linked to was quite well written and contains quite a few citations from reputable source. I know the LGBT community likes to act like none of this ever existed; however, it did. Deal with it.

Now, if you  want to stick your head in the sand, that's your business. But if you're going to keep playing dumb and insist I provide more and more facts that you then choose to ignore, please stop wasting my time.


You can also stop wasting my time by citing a few organizations that either no longer exist, or whom are so obscure as to never even crossed my radar in my entire life as examples of wide acceptance by the LGBT community for NAMBLA.

Also, a gay pride parade in one city does not constitute wide support by an entire national subculture.
2013-06-20 02:53:56 PM  
2 votes:

whitman00: Two gay people- Consenting adults.

Pedophilia- NON CONSENTING CHILD
Bestiality- NON CONSENTING ANIMAL

That's why liberals accept gay relationships and gay marriage and will always be opposed to pedophilia and bestiality.


My honest-to-god understanding is that conservatives were never really that big on consent.
2013-06-20 02:35:25 PM  
2 votes:

Farxist: whitman00: Two gay people- Consenting adults.

Pedophilia- NON CONSENTING CHILD
Bestiality- NON CONSENTING ANIMAL

That's why liberals accept gay relationships and gay marriage and will always be opposed to pedophilia and bestiality.

why the focus on consenting or not?
Are you okay with consenting child?


A child is incapable of consent.  QED
2013-06-20 02:12:01 PM  
2 votes:

ScreamingHangover: Aarontology: Man, why are all these anti-gay conservatives so obsessed with f*cking children?

It's like all they can think about. Two dudes holding hands and their minds go right to raping a child.

You'll find this mostly amongst the older conservatives: the ones who remember when Nambla was an active and accepted part of the LGBT community for over a decade, openly participating in gay pride parades and events.

The LGBT community threw Nambla under the bus in the mid-90's when they realize it was hurting the cause, but that doesn't stop the fact that Nambla members were once accepted amongst their ranks. Link

Personally, I support gay marriage. However, much like Christians (or any other group), the LGBT community also has some skeletons in the closet.


When in the blue fark was NAMBLA an 'accepted' part of the LGBT community?
2013-06-20 01:53:57 PM  
2 votes:
Remember "Traditional Marriage" was basically a man OWNING his wife.
2013-06-20 09:52:57 PM  
1 votes:

2 grams: Rush wasn't associating homosexuality to pediphile rape.

The article's headline as well as the subby's is way off base and misleading to say the least..

Half of the posts in this thread have thier head up thier ass.   What Limbaugh did was claim that changing the language of the discussion can sway public acceptance of an idea.

Just as many people who were once against gay marraige came to accept it, he claims because the language about it changed.

Rush then said that there are groups that are trying to normalize pediphile and doing so by addressing it as an alternative life style and change the language of the discussion to sway people.

You can agree with him, disagree, i don't farking care but claiming Rush Limbaugh is linking homosexaul marraige to pediphile rape is welll, you're either lying or ignorant.


No, the liar is you. Rush is claiming that "liberals" are trying to "normalize" pedophilia and they're doing it the same way they normalized gay marriage, by changing the language. (Never mind that this isn't even happening, but whatever).
(That's how all movements are done, by the way. It's one one side calls it "Pro Life" and the other calls it "Pro Choice". Language matters).
So why didn't Rush say that women voting and owning property was once unthinkable, just as legalized pedophilia is unthinkable now? Well, because he's not trying to establish a link between those two things in anyone's minds, and he can't publicly admit that he's opposed to women voting and owning property either. But he is, however, trying to establish a link between homosexuality (which he calls "gay marriage", but let's not kid ourselves) and pedophilia. And he does it because he thinks if he and Ben Cason and Rick Santorum and Pat Robertson and Michelle Bachman and every other social conservative  constantly say "gay" and "pedophile" in the same sentence, people will establish that link.
And apparently some people are falling for it.
2013-06-20 09:43:55 PM  
1 votes:

ScreamingHangover: I like how you started out with a categorical denial.
....then claimed it was a few fringe examples,
...then pointed the finger at someone else.
... and now admit Nambla was a part of the community.


You're still in denial about a whole decade of participation, but at least progress is being made.


You started out with:

You'll find this mostly amongst the older conservatives: the ones who remember when Nambla was an active and accepted part of the LGBT community for over a decade, openly participating in gay pride parades and events.

For one, it's a weak rationalization to begin with, since it's unlikely that any of these bigoted conservatives are actually familiar enough with gay pride rallies to know who actually attended. They're more likely just throwing out these accusations out of general idiocy and bigotry, as with their delusional rants about bestiality. Just apply Occam's Razor rather than coming up with some convoluted explanation based on what you think they "remember".

Second, a brief period of attendance at pride events is a very, very weak criterion for "active and accepted part of the LGBT community", since (as per your own link) they were opposed by many prominent LGBT leaders and organizations right from the start.

In other words, the only way your argument can be sustained is if we dilute the meaning of words like "accepted" to near-meaninglessness.
2013-06-20 06:21:01 PM  
1 votes:

Even With A Chainsaw: whitman00: Two gay people- Consenting adults.

Pedophilia- NON CONSENTING CHILD
Bestiality Hamburgers - NON CONSENTING ANIMAL

That's why liberals accept gay relationships and gay marriage and will always be opposed to pedophilia and bestiality.

FTFY

You need a better argument against bestiality.


You need a better concept of comparisons.
2013-06-20 05:34:47 PM  
1 votes:
Rush Limbaugh also said "Hey Obama, the American people want jobs, not health care reform", completely ignoring how the Republican party has spend 5+years filibustering and fighting every attempt to do anything about the recession because "The number-one job is to make Obama a one-term president" -Mitch McConnell, and ignoring how Romneycare was thought up by Republicans in the 90's, installed in Massachusetts by Romney (with absolutely no complaints), and wasn't thought about one bit until Obama liked it enough to make it national (which Romney wanted to do as well) and the right went absolutely berserk about it to the point where Romney promised to destroy Romneycare when he was elected... then put it right back up again, but it would be good and holy because a white Republican did it.

And let's not forget how Rush and the right outright lie and falsify everything involving the recession, job growth and loss, and Romneycare (especially Romneycare) for the purpose of demonizing Obama and the left. Republicans are no longer for the country, they're for themselves and anyone who isn't one of them be damned. They'll destroy the country out of spite and hate if they get half a chance.
2013-06-20 03:18:49 PM  
1 votes:

ScreamingHangover: As per my original post: it explains why old conservatives tend to associate homosexuality with pedophilia. I'm just pointing out that allowing Nambla to openly participate in the largest gay pride parade in the country back in the 80's may have had something to do with it.


Interesting.  And I suppose Old Conservatives tend to associate the Catholic church with pedophile rape, what with them allowing and covering it up for hundreds of years including much more recently than the 80s.  And Old Conservatives tend to associate the Republican party with racism, what with their courting of racists, including into the 80s.

No, Conservatives tend to associate homosexuality to pedophilia because they are attempting to court religious conservatives, who hate gays, "Because the Bible said so."  But hating gays simply because, "The Bible said so," isn't really looked upon with favor in the civilized parts of the U.S.  So they have to muddy the waters by associating gays with two, sometimes three, separate taboo out-groups in the hopes of smearing them by associating, those groups being NAMBLA, animal fauckers and polygamists.  Or, I suppose you're going to show how Conservatives just tend to associate gays with animals fauckers and polygamists by pointing to the inclusion of the Mormon Animal Faucker floats in the N.Y. pride parade as well.
2013-06-20 02:58:36 PM  
1 votes:

ScreamingHangover: Cythraul: Gay people at Cornell? Seriously? That's your "LGBT community?"

I've never even heard of the Gay Liberation Front or the IL&GA.

Sounds like a community wide scandal to me.

Funny how you missed the New York City Gay Pride March . That's how I (and most) first heard of Nambla: back in the 80's, it was an annual event in the local news how various LGBT organizations were protesting their participation in the parade. Nonetheless, they were still sanctioned participants.

The article I linked to was quite well written and contains quite a few citations from reputable source. I know the LGBT community likes to act like none of this ever existed; however, it did. Deal with it.

Now, if you  want to stick your head in the sand, that's your business. But if you're going to keep playing dumb and insist I provide more and more facts that you then choose to ignore, please stop wasting my time.


You might as well claim that Christians support child molestation because fundamentalist Mormons believe they have the right to underage spirit brides.

Deal with it. That's how facts work.
2013-06-20 02:57:39 PM  
1 votes:

Farxist: whitman00: Two gay people- Consenting adults.

Pedophilia- NON CONSENTING CHILD
Bestiality- NON CONSENTING ANIMAL

That's why liberals accept gay relationships and gay marriage and will always be opposed to pedophilia and bestiality.

why the focus on consenting or not?
Are you okay with consenting child?


The point being that a child can't consent.  The focus is on consent because that's a very bright line between sex that should be legal, and sex that shouldn't be legal.  You of course, know this already but thought you had a neat gotcha created only due to jumping on a statement without actually reading it.
2013-06-20 02:54:08 PM  
1 votes:

Farxist: factoryconnection: Farxist: Are you okay with consenting child?

This must be the Politics tab I've heard so much about.  Pardon me while I go get a post-facepalm ice pack.

When you selective cut out things from a post, you will lose context.  I am not sure why you did that whether it was deliberate or not.


Hey - don't blame him.
YOU'RE the one seeming to imply that children can consent to being raped and abused.
2013-06-20 02:47:57 PM  
1 votes:
ScreamingHangover:

notice under the section "Relations with LGBT organizations", there's a whole lot of condemning and ejecting, but pay attention to the dates: this all happened during 1993-1994,

You should go back and re-read that section of your link.  It does not support your claim.
2013-06-20 02:47:09 PM  
1 votes:

Corvus: Remember "Traditional Marriage" was basically a man OWNING his wife.


Hold on, they'll be getting around to that part.
2013-06-20 02:46:34 PM  
1 votes:

Farxist: Well, at least I know which alts you use.


If you're thinking that I'm an alt of anyone's, or have any alts, then you can cross off "become Sherlock Holmes" from your bucket list, because it ain't happening.
2013-06-20 02:43:18 PM  
1 votes:

ScreamingHangover: So there's a 10-15 year gap between Nambla's participation and these organization's condemnation.


I guess there's a reason you keep flogging this hobby-horse, but I don't think it's working the way you intended it.
2013-06-20 02:39:04 PM  
1 votes:
None his 4 wives available for comment

Nor were the children of the Dominican Republic.
2013-06-20 02:32:46 PM  
1 votes:

Weaver95: I really hope limbaugh continues to speak for the GOP and their family values platform. Every time he tries to claim the moral high ground the GOP loses a couple hundred more voters.


This should be true, but then again, these family voters are the biggest hypocrites...

Exhibit A)
SC family voters voting in Mark Sanford to Congress this year.
2013-06-20 02:26:10 PM  
1 votes:

ScreamingHangover: Cythraul: ScreamingHangover: Aarontology: Man, why are all these anti-gay conservatives so obsessed with f*cking children?

It's like all they can think about. Two dudes holding hands and their minds go right to raping a child.

You'll find this mostly amongst the older conservatives: the ones who remember when Nambla was an active and accepted part of the LGBT community for over a decade, openly participating in gay pride parades and events.

The LGBT community threw Nambla under the bus in the mid-90's when they realize it was hurting the cause, but that doesn't stop the fact that Nambla members were once accepted amongst their ranks. Link

Personally, I support gay marriage. However, much like Christians (or any other group), the LGBT community also has some skeletons in the closet.

When in the blue fark was NAMBLA an 'accepted' part of the LGBT community?

RTFA: The 80's. They openly participated in LGBT events. As I said, it wasn't until the mid -90s that the LGBT community threw them under the bus and whitewashed the whole thing


Even if what you say is true, you should narrow your accusations down a little. What is the 'LGBT community' in this instance? I'm a member of the LGBT community, and I, and anyone else I know in the LGBT community sure as hell would never support NAMBLA.
2013-06-20 02:22:53 PM  
1 votes:
You know, we could just ignore him.
2013-06-20 02:18:16 PM  
1 votes:

Farxist: Are you okay with consenting child?


This must be the Politics tab I've heard so much about.  Pardon me while I go get a post-facepalm ice pack.
2013-06-20 02:16:10 PM  
1 votes:

Cythraul: When in the blue fark was NAMBLA an 'accepted' part of the LGBT community?


It wasn't. But conservatives are still trying to find an equalizer for the whole Catholic sex abuse thing, so they pretend that was the case.
2013-06-20 02:11:45 PM  
1 votes:
The slippery slope argument should never be used by anyone, not even to advocate for what you or I might agree is the "right" side. It is fundamentally flawed logic. Every step deserves to be judged on its own merits. We're trying to climb to the top of Mt. Moral. If the peak is 50 feet in front of us, we should walk 50 feet. The fact that 70 feet is too far doesn't eliminate the fact that where we are isn't far enough.
2013-06-20 02:08:58 PM  
1 votes:

Aarontology: Man, why are all these anti-gay conservatives so obsessed with f*cking children?

boys?

All these people are incredibly ignorant or deliberately misleading or massive sexists if not all three when they don't mention all the girls that get abused.  If there really was a marriage->pedophilia connection the solution would be banning ALL marriage.
2013-06-20 02:03:52 PM  
1 votes:

meat0918: Why is it the loudest defenders of "traditional marriage" are the ones with the most ex-wives?


They have the most marrying experience.
2013-06-20 02:02:59 PM  
1 votes:
FTFA: There is a movement on to normalize pedophilia, and I guarantee you your reaction to that is probably much the same as your reaction when you first heard about gay marriage.

If by "much the same" you mean "completely the opposite", then yes.
2013-06-20 02:02:51 PM  
1 votes:

Prey4reign: Why are hotel keepers so glad about same sex marriage?


Because, with them having their shiat packed all the time, patrons occupying the Honeymoon Suites will have a better chance of getting out of the hotel alive in case of a fire.


This isn't 4chan.
2013-06-20 02:02:34 PM  
1 votes:
Does he also believe that legalization of marijuana will lead to an increase of people destroying their hearing by Oxy abuse?

You just know that he is dejected because he sees the time-share money he spent in the Dominican at El Niño Chingado resort might have been wasted if everyone can get it locally
2013-06-20 01:59:37 PM  
1 votes:
I really hope limbaugh continues to speak for the GOP and their family values platform. Every time he tries to claim the moral high ground the GOP loses a couple hundred more voters.
2013-06-20 01:55:04 PM  
1 votes:
He forgot turtles, man, it's turtles all the way down.
2013-06-20 01:48:16 PM  
1 votes:
Man, why are all these anti-gay conservatives so obsessed with f*cking children?

It's like all they can think about. Two dudes holding hands and their minds go right to raping a child.
2013-06-20 01:42:03 PM  
1 votes:
img.fark.net
Project much, Rush?
 
Displayed 41 of 41 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report