Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Inquisitr)   Rush Limbaugh says gay people marrying will lead to acceptance of pedophilia and destroy 'traditional marriage'. None his four wives available for comment   (inquisitr.com ) divider line 208
    More: Dumbass, Rush Limbaugh, same-sex marriages  
•       •       •

1027 clicks; posted to Politics » on 20 Jun 2013 at 1:48 PM (2 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



208 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-06-20 02:17:36 PM  
The mouthpiece of the GOP has spoken!

not shocking, not edgy, nothing of actual substance, just loud mouth attention gettin' hate.

so, we take out the attention & it's simply some guy in a booth talking to his constituency regurgitating their beliefs to one another.

he is powerless against us.
 
2013-06-20 02:18:16 PM  

Farxist: Are you okay with consenting child?


This must be the Politics tab I've heard so much about.  Pardon me while I go get a post-facepalm ice pack.
 
2013-06-20 02:21:24 PM  

Tommy Moo: The slippery slope argument should never be used by anyone, not even to advocate for what you or I might agree is the "right" side. It is fundamentally flawed logic. Every step deserves to be judged on its own merits. We're trying to climb to the top of Mt. Moral. If the peak is 50 feet in front of us, we should walk 50 feet. The fact that 70 feet is too far doesn't eliminate the fact that where we are isn't far enough.


There are plenty of occasions when the slope is actually quite slippery.
 
2013-06-20 02:22:20 PM  
Oddly enough, he said almost the same thing last year, after SCOTUS ruled Obamacare legal.
 
2013-06-20 02:22:53 PM  
You know, we could just ignore him.
 
2013-06-20 02:24:58 PM  

factoryconnection: Farxist: Are you okay with consenting child?

This must be the Politics tab I've heard so much about.  Pardon me while I go get a post-facepalm ice pack.


When you selective cut out things from a post, you will lose context.  I am not sure why you did that whether it was deliberate or not.
 
2013-06-20 02:26:10 PM  

ScreamingHangover: Cythraul: ScreamingHangover: Aarontology: Man, why are all these anti-gay conservatives so obsessed with f*cking children?

It's like all they can think about. Two dudes holding hands and their minds go right to raping a child.

You'll find this mostly amongst the older conservatives: the ones who remember when Nambla was an active and accepted part of the LGBT community for over a decade, openly participating in gay pride parades and events.

The LGBT community threw Nambla under the bus in the mid-90's when they realize it was hurting the cause, but that doesn't stop the fact that Nambla members were once accepted amongst their ranks. Link

Personally, I support gay marriage. However, much like Christians (or any other group), the LGBT community also has some skeletons in the closet.

When in the blue fark was NAMBLA an 'accepted' part of the LGBT community?

RTFA: The 80's. They openly participated in LGBT events. As I said, it wasn't until the mid -90s that the LGBT community threw them under the bus and whitewashed the whole thing


Even if what you say is true, you should narrow your accusations down a little. What is the 'LGBT community' in this instance? I'm a member of the LGBT community, and I, and anyone else I know in the LGBT community sure as hell would never support NAMBLA.
 
2013-06-20 02:26:41 PM  

EyeballKid: You know, we could just ignore him.


that seems to be our best option, i must admit that it's hard not to point & laugh & then feel offended, followed by acceptance of the Right wing view on SS marriage.

Then vote accordingly, so some good may come out of their hate.
 
2013-06-20 02:29:28 PM  

Aarontology: Man, why are all these anti-gay conservatives so obsessed with f*cking children?

It's like all they can think about. Two dudes holding hands and their minds go right to raping a child.


But that was in the Dominican Republic so it is okay. Leave Rush alone!
 
2013-06-20 02:32:46 PM  

Weaver95: I really hope limbaugh continues to speak for the GOP and their family values platform. Every time he tries to claim the moral high ground the GOP loses a couple hundred more voters.


This should be true, but then again, these family voters are the biggest hypocrites...

Exhibit A)
SC family voters voting in Mark Sanford to Congress this year.
 
2013-06-20 02:34:47 PM  

Cythraul: Even if what you say is true, you should narrow your accusations down a little. What is the 'LGBT community' in this instance? I'm a member of the LGBT community, and I, and anyone else I know in the LGBT community sure as hell would never support NAMBLA.


In this instance, the LGBT community is a person called Harry Hay. And he didn't even support NAMBLA, he just said it seemed hypocritical of the gay community to utterly reject them the way that it had since their inception.
 
2013-06-20 02:35:25 PM  

Farxist: whitman00: Two gay people- Consenting adults.

Pedophilia- NON CONSENTING CHILD
Bestiality- NON CONSENTING ANIMAL

That's why liberals accept gay relationships and gay marriage and will always be opposed to pedophilia and bestiality.

why the focus on consenting or not?
Are you okay with consenting child?


A child is incapable of consent.  QED
 
2013-06-20 02:35:38 PM  

EyeballKid: You know, we could just ignore him.


Are you kidding me? What would we do without him?! The more rush talks, the more he weakens the republican party. Every time limbaugh grabs a headline he inspires contempt for the GOP and their family values platform. I couldn't find a more effective weapon against evangelical dominionist Christian repubublicans than rush limbaugh and his insane rants about how he is gonna fix this country and stop the godless heathen libruls who are ruining it for rich white guys and their 20 something trophy wives.
 
2013-06-20 02:35:59 PM  

Farxist: When you selective cut out things from a post, you will lose context. I am not sure why you did that whether it was deliberate or not.


You suck at this. Really, really badly. My advice: lurk moar, and take notes. Come back with an alt that's not associated with fail of such magnitude.
 
2013-06-20 02:36:09 PM  

Cythraul: ScreamingHangover: Cythraul: ScreamingHangover: Aarontology: Man, why are all these anti-gay conservatives so obsessed with f*cking children?

It's like all they can think about. Two dudes holding hands and their minds go right to raping a child.

You'll find this mostly amongst the older conservatives: the ones who remember when Nambla was an active and accepted part of the LGBT community for over a decade, openly participating in gay pride parades and events.

The LGBT community threw Nambla under the bus in the mid-90's when they realize it was hurting the cause, but that doesn't stop the fact that Nambla members were once accepted amongst their ranks. Link

Personally, I support gay marriage. However, much like Christians (or any other group), the LGBT community also has some skeletons in the closet.

When in the blue fark was NAMBLA an 'accepted' part of the LGBT community?

RTFA: The 80's. They openly participated in LGBT events. As I said, it wasn't until the mid -90s that the LGBT community threw them under the bus and whitewashed the whole thing

Even if what you say is true, you should narrow your accusations down a little. What is the 'LGBT community' in this instance? I'm a member of the LGBT community, and I, and anyone else I know in the LGBT community sure as hell would never support NAMBLA.



From the article:


Allen Ginsberg,
Harry Hay,
Pat Califia,
Gay PAC (Gay People at Cornell)
New York City Gay Pride March
Gay Liberation Front
The International Lesbian and Gay Association

notice under the section "Relations with LGBT organizations", there's a whole lot of condemning and ejecting, but pay attention to the dates: this all happened during 1993-1994, whereas Nambla had been associated with these groups throughout the 80's. So there's a 10-15 year gap between Nambla's participation and these organization's condemnation.
 
2013-06-20 02:36:56 PM  

Cythraul: ScreamingHangover: Aarontology: Man, why are all these anti-gay conservatives so obsessed with f*cking children?

It's like all they can think about. Two dudes holding hands and their minds go right to raping a child.

You'll find this mostly amongst the older conservatives: the ones who remember when Nambla was an active and accepted part of the LGBT community for over a decade, openly participating in gay pride parades and events.

When in the blue fark was NAMBLA an 'accepted' part of the LGBT community?


Nineteen derpity-five.
 
2013-06-20 02:38:59 PM  
If I were King, I would have one of you do a little research and find him talking about this subject every few days/weeks since his maw first intruded on the public airwaves and show that his dire predictions never really occur.  They are only meant to scare rubes and garner notice to him.

I would also have one of you bring me an iced tea, slightly sweetened with a lemon wedge.
 
2013-06-20 02:39:04 PM  
None his 4 wives available for comment

Nor were the children of the Dominican Republic.
 
2013-06-20 02:41:02 PM  

ScreamingHangover: Cythraul: ScreamingHangover: Cythraul: ScreamingHangover: Aarontology: Man, why are all these anti-gay conservatives so obsessed with f*cking children?

It's like all they can think about. Two dudes holding hands and their minds go right to raping a child.

You'll find this mostly amongst the older conservatives: the ones who remember when Nambla was an active and accepted part of the LGBT community for over a decade, openly participating in gay pride parades and events.

The LGBT community threw Nambla under the bus in the mid-90's when they realize it was hurting the cause, but that doesn't stop the fact that Nambla members were once accepted amongst their ranks. Link

Personally, I support gay marriage. However, much like Christians (or any other group), the LGBT community also has some skeletons in the closet.

When in the blue fark was NAMBLA an 'accepted' part of the LGBT community?

RTFA: The 80's. They openly participated in LGBT events. As I said, it wasn't until the mid -90s that the LGBT community threw them under the bus and whitewashed the whole thing

Even if what you say is true, you should narrow your accusations down a little. What is the 'LGBT community' in this instance? I'm a member of the LGBT community, and I, and anyone else I know in the LGBT community sure as hell would never support NAMBLA.

Gay PAC (Gay People at Cornell)
Gay Liberation Front
The International Lesbian and Gay Association


Gay people at Cornell? Seriously? That's your "LGBT community?"

I've never even heard of the Gay Liberation Front or the IL&GA.

Sounds like a community wide scandal to me.
 
2013-06-20 02:41:21 PM  
Rush limbaugh leads to the expansion of Dominican boy's bungholes.
 
2013-06-20 02:41:44 PM  
Cythraul:

Even if what you say is true, you should narrow your accusations down a little. What is the 'LGBT community' in this instance? I'm a member of the LGBT community, and I, and anyone else I know in the LGBT community sure as hell would never support NAMBLA.

They never really had much support, and there was active opposition to including them right from the beginning.  GLAAD didn't make an official statement about NAMBLA until 1994, so I suppose that's what  ScreamingHangover is referring to as "acceptance."
 
2013-06-20 02:43:09 PM  

Cythraul: ScreamingHangover: Cythraul: ScreamingHangover: Cythraul: ScreamingHangover: Aarontology: Man, why are all these anti-gay conservatives so obsessed with f*cking children?

It's like all they can think about. Two dudes holding hands and their minds go right to raping a child.

You'll find this mostly amongst the older conservatives: the ones who remember when Nambla was an active and accepted part of the LGBT community for over a decade, openly participating in gay pride parades and events.

The LGBT community threw Nambla under the bus in the mid-90's when they realize it was hurting the cause, but that doesn't stop the fact that Nambla members were once accepted amongst their ranks. Link

Personally, I support gay marriage. However, much like Christians (or any other group), the LGBT community also has some skeletons in the closet.

When in the blue fark was NAMBLA an 'accepted' part of the LGBT community?

RTFA: The 80's. They openly participated in LGBT events. As I said, it wasn't until the mid -90s that the LGBT community threw them under the bus and whitewashed the whole thing

Even if what you say is true, you should narrow your accusations down a little. What is the 'LGBT community' in this instance? I'm a member of the LGBT community, and I, and anyone else I know in the LGBT community sure as hell would never support NAMBLA.

Gay PAC (Gay People at Cornell)
Gay Liberation Front
The International Lesbian and Gay Association

Gay people at Cornell? Seriously? That's your "LGBT community?"

I've never even heard of the Gay Liberation Front or the IL&GA.

Sounds like a community wide scandal to me.


*pulls string* The whackadoodle goes "herpa derpa doooooo!"
 
2013-06-20 02:43:18 PM  

ScreamingHangover: So there's a 10-15 year gap between Nambla's participation and these organization's condemnation.


I guess there's a reason you keep flogging this hobby-horse, but I don't think it's working the way you intended it.
 
2013-06-20 02:43:26 PM  

theorellior: Farxist: When you selective cut out things from a post, you will lose context. I am not sure why you did that whether it was deliberate or not.

You suck at this. Really, really badly. My advice: lurk moar, and take notes. Come back with an alt that's not associated with fail of such magnitude.


If a response is already 100% fail, that I only quoted 50% of it, it is still completely consisting of failure.  I see my point has already been covered, however.
 
2013-06-20 02:44:33 PM  

theorellior: Farxist: When you selective cut out things from a post, you will lose context. I am not sure why you did that whether it was deliberate or not.

You suck at this. Really, really badly. My advice: lurk moar, and take notes. Come back with an alt that's not associated with fail of such magnitude.


Well, at least I know which alts you use.
 
2013-06-20 02:45:17 PM  

Prey4reign: Why are hotel keepers so glad about same sex marriage?


Because, with them having their shiat packed all the time, patrons occupying the Honeymoon Suites will have a better chance of getting out of the hotel alive in case of a fire.


Terrible delivery. Just bad, and you should feel bad.

"In case of a fire their shiat is already packed!"
 
2013-06-20 02:46:28 PM  
Subby, since none of his 4 wives were available for comment, you could ask Dominican republic boys about it. I'm sure some of them will be happy.
 
2013-06-20 02:46:34 PM  

Farxist: Well, at least I know which alts you use.


If you're thinking that I'm an alt of anyone's, or have any alts, then you can cross off "become Sherlock Holmes" from your bucket list, because it ain't happening.
 
2013-06-20 02:47:09 PM  

Corvus: Remember "Traditional Marriage" was basically a man OWNING his wife.


Hold on, they'll be getting around to that part.
 
2013-06-20 02:47:57 PM  
ScreamingHangover:

notice under the section "Relations with LGBT organizations", there's a whole lot of condemning and ejecting, but pay attention to the dates: this all happened during 1993-1994,

You should go back and re-read that section of your link.  It does not support your claim.
 
2013-06-20 02:50:53 PM  

Cythraul: Gay people at Cornell? Seriously? That's your "LGBT community?"

I've never even heard of the Gay Liberation Front or the IL&GA.

Sounds like a community wide scandal to me.


Funny how you missed the New York City Gay Pride March . That's how I (and most) first heard of Nambla: back in the 80's, it was an annual event in the local news how various LGBT organizations were protesting their participation in the parade. Nonetheless, they were still sanctioned participants.

The article I linked to was quite well written and contains quite a few citations from reputable source. I know the LGBT community likes to act like none of this ever existed; however, it did. Deal with it.

Now, if you  want to stick your head in the sand, that's your business. But if you're going to keep playing dumb and insist I provide more and more facts that you then choose to ignore, please stop wasting my time.
 
2013-06-20 02:53:56 PM  

whitman00: Two gay people- Consenting adults.

Pedophilia- NON CONSENTING CHILD
Bestiality- NON CONSENTING ANIMAL

That's why liberals accept gay relationships and gay marriage and will always be opposed to pedophilia and bestiality.


My honest-to-god understanding is that conservatives were never really that big on consent.
 
2013-06-20 02:54:06 PM  

Farxist: whitman00: Two gay people- Consenting adults.

Pedophilia- NON CONSENTING CHILD
Bestiality- NON CONSENTING ANIMAL

That's why liberals accept gay relationships and gay marriage and will always be opposed to pedophilia and bestiality.

why the focus on consenting or not?
Are you okay with consenting child?


A child, legally, cannot consent.  They can sign all the papers they want saying they consent and you can get a video of them saying "yes I consent to have sex" and it doesn't matter.  By operation of law, they cannot consent.

/not sure if this was already covered
 
2013-06-20 02:54:08 PM  

Farxist: factoryconnection: Farxist: Are you okay with consenting child?

This must be the Politics tab I've heard so much about.  Pardon me while I go get a post-facepalm ice pack.

When you selective cut out things from a post, you will lose context.  I am not sure why you did that whether it was deliberate or not.


Hey - don't blame him.
YOU'RE the one seeming to imply that children can consent to being raped and abused.
 
2013-06-20 02:55:06 PM  

Farxist: Well, at least I know which alts you use.


All of them. Fark is only me talking to myself, and your lame troll account.
 
2013-06-20 02:55:08 PM  

ScreamingHangover: Cythraul: Gay people at Cornell? Seriously? That's your "LGBT community?"

I've never even heard of the Gay Liberation Front or the IL&GA.

Sounds like a community wide scandal to me.

Funny how you missed the New York City Gay Pride March . That's how I (and most) first heard of Nambla: back in the 80's, it was an annual event in the local news how various LGBT organizations were protesting their participation in the parade. Nonetheless, they were still sanctioned participants.

The article I linked to was quite well written and contains quite a few citations from reputable source. I know the LGBT community likes to act like none of this ever existed; however, it did. Deal with it.

Now, if you  want to stick your head in the sand, that's your business. But if you're going to keep playing dumb and insist I provide more and more facts that you then choose to ignore, please stop wasting my time.


You can also stop wasting my time by citing a few organizations that either no longer exist, or whom are so obscure as to never even crossed my radar in my entire life as examples of wide acceptance by the LGBT community for NAMBLA.

Also, a gay pride parade in one city does not constitute wide support by an entire national subculture.
 
hej
2013-06-20 02:55:38 PM  

EyeballKid: You know, we could just ignore him.


It's far better to play into his trolling by giving him publicity.
 
2013-06-20 02:56:02 PM  
You'd think he'd want those things...
 
2013-06-20 02:56:40 PM  

ScreamingHangover: Now, if you want to stick your head in the sand, that's your business. But if you're going to keep playing dumb and insist I provide more and more facts that you then choose to ignore, please stop wasting my time.


Why are you flogging this particular hobbyhorse? What's your point, and how is it relevant to a discussion in 2013?
 
2013-06-20 02:57:20 PM  

Cythraul: ScreamingHangover: Cythraul: Gay people at Cornell? Seriously? That's your "LGBT community?"

I've never even heard of the Gay Liberation Front or the IL&GA.

Sounds like a community wide scandal to me.

Funny how you missed the New York City Gay Pride March . That's how I (and most) first heard of Nambla: back in the 80's, it was an annual event in the local news how various LGBT organizations were protesting their participation in the parade. Nonetheless, they were still sanctioned participants.

The article I linked to was quite well written and contains quite a few citations from reputable source. I know the LGBT community likes to act like none of this ever existed; however, it did. Deal with it.

Now, if you  want to stick your head in the sand, that's your business. But if you're going to keep playing dumb and insist I provide more and more facts that you then choose to ignore, please stop wasting my time.

You can also stop wasting my time by citing a few organizations that either no longer exist, or whom are so obscure as to never even crossed my radar in my entire life as examples of wide acceptance by the LGBT community for NAMBLA.

Also, a gay pride parade in one city does not constitute wide support by an entire national subculture.


Yes. because we all know New York's gay population is marginal.
 
2013-06-20 02:57:39 PM  

Farxist: whitman00: Two gay people- Consenting adults.

Pedophilia- NON CONSENTING CHILD
Bestiality- NON CONSENTING ANIMAL

That's why liberals accept gay relationships and gay marriage and will always be opposed to pedophilia and bestiality.

why the focus on consenting or not?
Are you okay with consenting child?


The point being that a child can't consent.  The focus is on consent because that's a very bright line between sex that should be legal, and sex that shouldn't be legal.  You of course, know this already but thought you had a neat gotcha created only due to jumping on a statement without actually reading it.
 
2013-06-20 02:58:36 PM  

ScreamingHangover: Cythraul: Gay people at Cornell? Seriously? That's your "LGBT community?"

I've never even heard of the Gay Liberation Front or the IL&GA.

Sounds like a community wide scandal to me.

Funny how you missed the New York City Gay Pride March . That's how I (and most) first heard of Nambla: back in the 80's, it was an annual event in the local news how various LGBT organizations were protesting their participation in the parade. Nonetheless, they were still sanctioned participants.

The article I linked to was quite well written and contains quite a few citations from reputable source. I know the LGBT community likes to act like none of this ever existed; however, it did. Deal with it.

Now, if you  want to stick your head in the sand, that's your business. But if you're going to keep playing dumb and insist I provide more and more facts that you then choose to ignore, please stop wasting my time.


You might as well claim that Christians support child molestation because fundamentalist Mormons believe they have the right to underage spirit brides.

Deal with it. That's how facts work.
 
2013-06-20 03:01:09 PM  
"There is a movement on to normalize pedophilia,"

No.

"and I guarantee you your reaction to that is probably much the same as your reaction when you first heard about gay marriage."

And no.

What a buffoon.
 
2013-06-20 03:01:14 PM  

Lutrasimilis: You might as well claim that Christians support child molestation because fundamentalist Mormons believe they have the right to underage spirit brides.


Of course Christians support child/wives.  Mary, the mother of Jesus, was only 12 when she was knocked up by god himself.  If god saw no problem with knocking up a 12 year old, why would any Christian?
 
2013-06-20 03:01:37 PM  

theorellior: ScreamingHangover: Now, if you want to stick your head in the sand, that's your business. But if you're going to keep playing dumb and insist I provide more and more facts that you then choose to ignore, please stop wasting my time.

Why are you flogging this particular hobbyhorse? What's your point, and how is it relevant to a discussion in 2013?


As per my original post: it explains why old conservatives tend to associate homosexuality with pedophilia. I'm just pointing out that allowing  Nambla to openly participate in the largest gay pride parade in the country back in the 80's may have had something to do with it.
 
2013-06-20 03:02:15 PM  
Via the mouseover in yesterday's XKCD:

"Unfortunately, the notion of marriage which prevails...at the present time...regards the institution as simply a convenient arrangement or formal contract...this disregard for the sanctity of marriage and contempt for its restrictions is one of the most alarming tendencies of the present age  --  John Harvey Kellogg, Ladies' guide in Health and Disease (1883)"
 
2013-06-20 03:02:39 PM  
I like how the anti-gay stance in this thread is stuck with intentional misreadings and "something upsetting happened once 30 years ago".
 
2013-06-20 03:03:02 PM  
 
2013-06-20 03:07:18 PM  

ScreamingHangover: Yes. because we all know New York's gay population is marginal.


I said a herp, derp, the herpie, the herpie to the herp herp derp and you don't stop, to rock it to the whar whargarbl, say up jumped the garbl to the rhythm of the garbl-dy beat.
Now, what you hear is not a test, I'm derpin' to the beat!
 
2013-06-20 03:07:49 PM  
I've been "gay" married for a year and I haven't raped a child yet.
 
Displayed 50 of 208 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report