Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CBS News)   In addition to the NSA recording all of your phone calls and emails, the FBI is videotaping your from the sky. Your proctologist has not been implicated in the spying scandal. Yet   (cbsnews.com) divider line 133
    More: Scary, FBI, Federal Aviation Regulations, FBI director, Caribbean Sea, Senate Judiciary Committee, NSA, UAVs, Grassley  
•       •       •

3560 clicks; posted to Main » on 20 Jun 2013 at 10:35 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



133 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2013-06-20 10:37:00 AM  
I'm still shocked that anyone is honestly still surprised at this
 
2013-06-20 10:37:29 AM  
Then how come they missed the guy in the boat?
 
2013-06-20 10:37:29 AM  
If the FBI films my YOUR from the sky, I'll be pissed.
 
2013-06-20 10:38:16 AM  
Is there anybody left who doesn't see that our greatest enemy (our only enemy, really) is our own government? Anybody?
 
2013-06-20 10:38:52 AM  
I hear they even video you at the bank now!!!!1!!11! Big Brother is watching
 
2013-06-20 10:39:11 AM  
great, now they know about the starfish.........
 
2013-06-20 10:39:38 AM  

DrPainMD: Is there anybody left who doesn't see that our greatest enemy (our only enemy, really) is our own government? Anybody?


This. The largest terror cell in the world is in DC
 
2013-06-20 10:40:08 AM  
I guess I should start sunbathing in the nude now
 
2013-06-20 10:43:03 AM  
such drone use is done in a "very, very minimal way, and very seldom."

It always starts that way, just recreational use, so innocent.  You can control it you say to yourself.  Next thing you know, you're using them on work day nights, then at lunch times.  Next thing you know, you're sucking dick for more drones.
 
2013-06-20 10:43:55 AM  
img.fark.net

"You using the whole fist there, Obama?"
 
2013-06-20 10:45:14 AM  
www.keeptalkinggreece.com
scoffs at your survaylanz ekwipment.
 
2013-06-20 10:45:14 AM  
Cool. I printed out a giant aerial picture of a small nuclear storage facility, a large meth lab, various sundry brown people, and women on leashes tied to trees and placed it over my property.

For the lulz.
 
2013-06-20 10:45:23 AM  
F*cking perverts.  If you wanted to know my mastubatory habits, you could have just asked.  Put it on the next census questionnaire.  Jeez.
 
2013-06-20 10:47:37 AM  
They'll never find me in Mom's basement!
 
2013-06-20 10:47:39 AM  
I'm shocked there is any expectation of privacy from aerial vehicles...
 
2013-06-20 10:49:10 AM  
Just wait until iPhones start using fingerprint technology. You're farked
 
2013-06-20 10:51:12 AM  
During the RNC in NYC several years ago they deployed a Surveillance blimp to keep tabs on the demonstrators etc. So I think congress might want to ask questions about aerial surveillance vs. just drone use.
 
2013-06-20 10:52:01 AM  
ARGUS drone
 
2013-06-20 10:52:25 AM  

kindms: During the RNC in NYC several years ago they deployed a Surveillance blimp to keep tabs on the demonstrators


Oh the humanity!
 
2013-06-20 10:54:59 AM  
"In addition to the NSA recording all of your phone calls and emails, the FBI is videotaping your from the sky. Your proctologist has not been implicated in the spying scandal. Yet "


Yo submitter......


FYI - The NSA does not need to talk to your Proctologist. They have already captured all of your (electronic) medical record transactions.
 
2013-06-20 10:56:39 AM  
Just vote for the other guy.

Oh wait.

Well I'm stumped.
 
2013-06-20 10:58:40 AM  

megarian: Cool. I printed out a giant aerial picture of a small nuclear storage facility, a large meth lab, various sundry brown people, and women on leashes tied to trees and placed it over my property.

For the lulz.



I lol'ed at this. Can you send me the aerial pic of the women on leashes for my basement backyard?
 
2013-06-20 10:59:40 AM  
Ok America,

Why are we all suddenly enraged by something that has been going on for years?

So next week are we all going to discover the atrocities in Vietnam?
 
2013-06-20 11:02:26 AM  
If they're using thermal imagery they need a warrant, period. Settled law; even Clarence Thomas is on board with that, if memory serves.
 
2013-06-20 11:03:12 AM  

Amish Tech Support: Ok America,

Why are we all suddenly enraged by something that has been going on for years?

So next week are we all going to discover the atrocities in Vietnam?


This
 
2013-06-20 11:07:13 AM  
They didn't ask him about the surveillance blimps.
 
2013-06-20 11:09:31 AM  

Amish Tech Support: Ok America,

Why are we all suddenly enraged by something that has been going on for years?

So next week are we all going to discover the atrocities in Vietnam?


There was no Vietnam, man.
 
2013-06-20 11:11:57 AM  

blatz514: Amish Tech Support: Ok America,

Why are we all suddenly enraged by something that has been going on for years?

So next week are we all going to discover the atrocities in Vietnam?

There was no Vietnam, man.


Nam ain't over till POWs return.  Queue "Agent Orange" music and Huey sound tracks
 
2013-06-20 11:13:26 AM  

rkettens: Amish Tech Support: Ok America,

Why are we all suddenly enraged by something that has been going on for years?

So next week are we all going to discover the atrocities in Vietnam?

This


For me, that's not the point.  FTFA:

"At Wednesday's hearing, Grassley asked Mueller whether the bureau has developed a set of policies and procedures establishing the "operational limits" of its drone use on American soil.
Mueller responded, "We are in the initial stages of doing that, and I will tell you that our footprint is very small."

"We have very few, and of limited use," he added, "and are exploring not only the use, but the necessary guidelines for that use.""

By their own admission, they have no policies, no procedures, no guidelines for their use.  That's what's troubling, along with the (to me) obvious conclusion that there's no oversight.
 
2013-06-20 11:13:38 AM  
from headline: "the FBI is videotaping your from the sky. "

videotaping my what from the sky?
 
2013-06-20 11:15:04 AM  
There are few practical differences and no discernible legal differences between a drone and the fixed wing aircraft and helicopters that law enforcement have been using for decades. Why all the outrage now?

/because drones are "scary"?
 
2013-06-20 11:15:19 AM  
Videotaping you what?  Bald spot?  Pony?  Ass?
 
2013-06-20 11:15:25 AM  

midigod: "At Wednesday's hearing, Grassley asked Mueller whether the bureau has developed a set of policies and procedures establishing the "operational limits" of its drone use on American soil.
Mueller responded, "We are in the initial stages of doing that, and I will tell you that our footprint is very small."


Yeah. Protection of civil liberties is a pesky afterthought to Mueller.
 
2013-06-20 11:17:34 AM  

Voiceofreason01: There are few practical differences and no discernible legal differences between a drone and the fixed wing aircraft and helicopters that law enforcement have been using for decades. Why all the outrage now?

/because drones are "scary"?


Because they're small, fly at a much lower altitude, and are relatively inexpensive to operate which allows them to potentially be used on a much wider scale than manned aircraft. I doubt that they carry FAA tail numbers either, making accountability that much harder.
 
2013-06-20 11:19:02 AM  

IdBeCrazyIf: I'm still shocked that anyone is honestly still surprised at this


+1 wtf?
 
2013-06-20 11:19:26 AM  
I'm shocked that they are using videotape. VHS or Beta?
 
2013-06-20 11:19:31 AM  

Deep Contact: Then how come they missed the guy in the boat?


Just like most every large government projects,  They are incompetent.
"Hey just because some nice Chechen boys blew up some bombs doesn't mean they are important to spend our time watching.  It's not like their are members of the Tea Party or something.  THOSE guys want to cut funding for large government programs.  Where would we be if THEY got their way.  The terrorist would win."
 
2013-06-20 11:21:58 AM  
My what?
 
2013-06-20 11:27:03 AM  

TheOtherDub: My what?


Your making of redundant posts about an obvious typo in a fark headline, perhaps.
 
2013-06-20 11:27:21 AM  

Oldiron_79: DrPainMD: Is there anybody left who doesn't see that our greatest enemy (our only enemy, really) is our own government? Anybody?

This. The largest terror cell in the world is in DC


The biggest problem is the fact that the heads of these agencies are appointes confirmed by noted insider traders (congress).

So we're shocked when corupt politicians appoint equaly corrupt  directors.
 
2013-06-20 11:28:09 AM  

Amish Tech Support: Ok America,

Why are we all suddenly enraged by something that has been going on for years?


Because now Fox is covering it.
 
2013-06-20 11:30:30 AM  
The FBI is videotaping my what?

I'm sorry but I don't understand. Whom should I call?
 
2013-06-20 11:30:50 AM  
The day will shortly be here, if it isn't already, when all urban areas will be videotaped in high resolution 24/7 from surveillance aircraft or satellites. I've seen demonstrations of such a system in which individuals are identifiable or nearly so. It'll be essentially what London is trying to do, except they won't have to carpet a city with a gazillion individual cameras and there won't be any uncovered areas.
 
2013-06-20 11:32:11 AM  
Amusement:

Nam ain't over till POWs return.  Queue "Agent Orange" music and Huey sound tracks

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUTbBun0t4s

/Some NSFW language
 
2013-06-20 11:32:34 AM  

jjorsett: The day will shortly be here, if it isn't already, when all urban areas will be videotaped in high resolution 24/7 from surveillance aircraft or satellites. I've seen demonstrations of such a system in which individuals are identifiable or nearly so. It'll be essentially what London is trying to do, except they won't have to carpet a city with a gazillion individual cameras and there won't be any uncovered areas.


You'll know its here when some bullshiat reason for banning awnings over sidewalks is put forth.
 
2013-06-20 11:32:56 AM  
AndreMA:Because they're small, fly at a much lower altitude, and are relatively inexpensive to operate which allows them to potentially be used on a much wider scale than manned aircraft. I doubt that they carry FAA tail numbers either, making accountability that much harder.

Helicopters can operate at very effectively at a large range of altitudes and small fixed wing aircraft can operate in most conditions at a couple hundred feet. The FBI says that the FAA has OK'd all the flights so far.  I'm having a hard time thinking of reasons why the FBI shouldn't use unmanned aircraft to, as an example, stake out a building(with a warrant of course) or to pursue a suspect. If they're peeping in windows at night or abusing them like some law enforcement agencies have been doing with GPS tracking devices then that's a problem but it's a problem that's hardly unique to drone aircraft and one that needs to be addressed in a wider discussion about an individual's right to privacy.
 
2013-06-20 11:38:04 AM  
Don't worry, everything is perfectly legal.  Now go to sleep.

Ok to spy from the air:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_v._Ciraolo

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_v._Riley


OK to collect phone data:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._Maryland

Don't you fell safe? Now, go to sleep citizen,
 
2013-06-20 11:38:19 AM  

fullyautomatic: megarian: Cool. I printed out a giant aerial picture of a small nuclear storage facility, a large meth lab, various sundry brown people, and women on leashes tied to trees and placed it over my property.

For the lulz.


I lol'ed at this. Can you send me the aerial pic of the women on leashes for my basement backyard?


Sure. What flavor kind of girl? I have a special on the ones that don't speak any of the romance languages.
 
2013-06-20 11:41:20 AM  
AND YOU MOCKED US FOR DEMANDING THAT WE BE ALLOWED TO OWN SAMS UNDER THE 2ND AMENDMENT!
 
2013-06-20 11:41:57 AM  
There's a world of difference between armed remote-control aircraft being used to kill people in foreign countries that we are not at war with and the use of remote-control aircraft here in the US for entertainment, for competition, to take mapping or survey photographs, to deliver pizza, or to take photo/video of a crime scene.

What the loonies in the media and Congress are doing very successfully right now is attempting to take the legitimate moral ethical and legal outrage over #1 and transfer it to #2 because it's the FBI and that means it's Obama and he bad.

No citizen of the United States has any legitimate reason to object to the FBI using a remote-control aircraft to take photos of, film, and otherwise provide situational awareness of a crime scene.  It's a 100% legitimate investigative tool and unless it somehow interferes with the FAA's flight paths (unlikely) it is 100% legal as it is currently used.

So go take a cold shower and rub one out on some Ayn Rand books, Mr. Tea-Bag idiot, there's no story here.
 
2013-06-20 11:42:01 AM  
This is a travesty of our civil rights!Bush and Cheney should be impeached!Wait, what...? Ah, never mind.
 
2013-06-20 11:44:57 AM  

Strik3r: Your proctologist has not been implicated in the spying


They're not telling you everything.

Your proctologist is spilling the beans to the NSA proctologist. But it's a two way street. The NSA is talking to your proctologist.

If you'd like to know more about the NSA, ask your proctologist.
 
2013-06-20 11:50:43 AM  
My privacy is being violated! I am totally going to update my Facebook status about this!
 
2013-06-20 11:52:30 AM  
They can monitor me from the sky all they want. All they will discover is that I don't spend much time on my roof.
 
2013-06-20 11:53:55 AM  

Deep Contact: Then how come they missed the guy in the boat?


Listen, it was late, I had a long day, I had too much to drink... wait what are we talking about?
 
2013-06-20 11:54:18 AM  

IdBeCrazyIf: I'm still shocked that anyone is honestly still surprised at this


Yeah...  Done in one.

This is the thing...  And this is not paranoia speaking.  The gov't has been spying on it's own citizens since time out of mind.  And they will continue to.  This whole thing with congressional inquiries into the whole thing is a dog and pony show.  It means nothing.  It's just a way for the gov't to say, "WE'RE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT THIS INVASION OF PRIVACY!"  While all the while doing nothing of the sort.

Jerkoffs like Snowden that started this whole mess are really just making things worse and wasting more money.

The gov't is not looking through your emails, or tapping your calls, or looking through your windows with satellite cameras.  Why would they?  (Unless you have something to hide).

In other words, they could, but they only WOULD if given a reason.
And like it or not, there is not a damn thing you can do about it.  Complain all you want.  Rat out all the sources you want.  Question whoever you want.  The people in the background that have kept this going on for all this time will not be affected even in the slightest.
 
2013-06-20 11:55:52 AM  

cefm: There's a world of difference between armed remote-control aircraft being used to kill people in foreign countries that we are not at war with and the use of remote-control aircraft here in the US for entertainment, for competition, to take mapping or survey photographs, to deliver pizza, or to take photo/video of a crime scene.


Neither of which are the case here, so your point is irrelevant.

No citizen of the United States has any legitimate reason to object to the FBI using a remote-control aircraft to take photos of, film, and otherwise provide situational awareness of a crime scene.  It's a 100% legitimate investigative tool and unless it somehow interferes with the FAA's flight paths (unlikely) it is 100% legal as it is currently used.

How do you know how it's being used, since by their own admission, they have no standards, no policies, and no procedures, and no details of when or how they're being used has been released?
 
2013-06-20 11:56:13 AM  

megarian: fullyautomatic: megarian: Cool. I printed out a giant aerial picture of a small nuclear storage facility, a large meth lab, various sundry brown people, and women on leashes tied to trees and placed it over my property.

For the lulz.


I lol'ed at this. Can you send me the aerial pic of the women on leashes for my basement backyard?

Sure. What flavor kind of girl? I have a special on the ones that don't speak any of the romance languages.


Now you are the kind of person I would invite to parties.
 
2013-06-20 11:57:14 AM  

cefm: There's a world of difference between armed remote-control aircraft being used to kill people in foreign countries that we are not at war with and the use of remote-control aircraft here in the US for entertainment, for competition, to take mapping or survey photographs, to deliver pizza, or to take photo/video of a crime scene.

What the loonies in the media and Congress are doing very successfully right now is attempting to take the legitimate moral ethical and legal outrage over #1 and transfer it to #2 because it's the FBI and that means it's Obama and he bad.

No citizen of the United States has any legitimate reason to object to the FBI using a remote-control aircraft to take photos of, film, and otherwise provide situational awareness of a crime scene.  It's a 100% legitimate investigative tool and unless it somehow interferes with the FAA's flight paths (unlikely) it is 100% legal as it is currently used.

So go take a cold shower and rub one out on some Ayn Rand books, Mr. Tea-Bag idiot, there's no story here.


This this and this.  They fly a small UAV with a camera around active crime scenes.  That's perfectly legitimate.

Also, anyone who uses the term "drone" is probably not informed enough on the topic to speak inteligently.
 
2013-06-20 11:58:19 AM  
(lifted word for word from http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=3005)

Oh, so I guess you want colon cancer to win.
 
2013-06-20 11:58:40 AM  

PanicMan: cefm: There's a world of difference between armed remote-control aircraft being used to kill people in foreign countries that we are not at war with and the use of remote-control aircraft here in the US for entertainment, for competition, to take mapping or survey photographs, to deliver pizza, or to take photo/video of a crime scene.

What the loonies in the media and Congress are doing very successfully right now is attempting to take the legitimate moral ethical and legal outrage over #1 and transfer it to #2 because it's the FBI and that means it's Obama and he bad.

No citizen of the United States has any legitimate reason to object to the FBI using a remote-control aircraft to take photos of, film, and otherwise provide situational awareness of a crime scene.  It's a 100% legitimate investigative tool and unless it somehow interferes with the FAA's flight paths (unlikely) it is 100% legal as it is currently used.

So go take a cold shower and rub one out on some Ayn Rand books, Mr. Tea-Bag idiot, there's no story here.

This this and this.  They fly a small UAV with a camera around active crime scenes.  That's perfectly legitimate.

Also, anyone who uses the term "drone" is probably not informed enough on the topic to speak inteligently.


I'm very infromed on the topic, though.
 
2013-06-20 12:01:41 PM  

durbnpoisn: IdBeCrazyIf: I'm still shocked that anyone is honestly still surprised at this

Yeah...  Done in one.

This is the thing...  And this is not paranoia speaking.  The gov't has been spying on it's own citizens since time out of mind.  And they will continue to.  This whole thing with congressional inquiries into the whole thing is a dog and pony show.  It means nothing.  It's just a way for the gov't to say, "WE'RE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT THIS INVASION OF PRIVACY!"  While all the while doing nothing of the sort.

Jerkoffs like Snowden that started this whole mess are really just making things worse and wasting more money.

The gov't is not looking through your emails, or tapping your calls, or looking through your windows with satellite cameras.  Why would they?  (Unless you have something to hide).

In other words, they could, but they only WOULD if given a reason.
And like it or not, there is not a damn thing you can do about it.  Complain all you want.  Rat out all the sources you want.  Question whoever you want.  The people in the background that have kept this going on for all this time will not be affected even in the slightest.


bullshiat. You should be outraged about the NSA thing. There are common rules that we all have to follow and the NSA doesn't get to ignore them just because it's convenient for them to do so. That being said, the FBI operating a handful of drones for legitimate (and legal) purposes isn't a big deal.
 
2013-06-20 12:01:56 PM  
The important thing is that all of these 'scandals' are really just a way to waste everyone's time on an issue that will never go away whilst simultaneously Congress does absolutely f*cking zero.

I wouldn't be surprised if all this crap, Snowden included, was just done on purpose to distract us from the fact that our government in essence should be governing, which means drafting workable legislative compromises, and yet the immigration bill is a morass of crap and Congress wants to focus all its time and effort on an abortion bill and repealing Obamacare for the sake of political gamesmanship, two things which will never pass the Senate but will get out its base of crazies in 2014.

If you want the government to spy on you less, then VOTE FOR PEOPLE WHO WANT TO DEFUND THE MILITARY AND INTELLIGENCE ORGANIZATIONS.

Maybe we could even save a little cash too.
 
2013-06-20 12:04:19 PM  

verbaltoxin: PanicMan: cefm: There's a world of difference between armed remote-control aircraft being used to kill people in foreign countries that we are not at war with and the use of remote-control aircraft here in the US for entertainment, for competition, to take mapping or survey photographs, to deliver pizza, or to take photo/video of a crime scene.

What the loonies in the media and Congress are doing very successfully right now is attempting to take the legitimate moral ethical and legal outrage over #1 and transfer it to #2 because it's the FBI and that means it's Obama and he bad.

No citizen of the United States has any legitimate reason to object to the FBI using a remote-control aircraft to take photos of, film, and otherwise provide situational awareness of a crime scene.  It's a 100% legitimate investigative tool and unless it somehow interferes with the FAA's flight paths (unlikely) it is 100% legal as it is currently used.

So go take a cold shower and rub one out on some Ayn Rand books, Mr. Tea-Bag idiot, there's no story here.

This this and this.  They fly a small UAV with a camera around active crime scenes.  That's perfectly legitimate.

Also, anyone who uses the term "drone" is probably not informed enough on the topic to speak inteligently.

I'm very infromed on the topic, though.


Whar flight certifct whar?
 
2013-06-20 12:04:59 PM  

bdub77: The important thing is that all of these 'scandals' are really just a way to waste everyone's time on an issue that will never go away whilst simultaneously Congress does absolutely f*cking zero.

I wouldn't be surprised if all this crap, Snowden included, was just done on purpose to distract us from the fact that our government in essence should be governing, which means drafting workable legislative compromises, and yet the immigration bill is a morass of crap and Congress wants to focus all its time and effort on an abortion bill and repealing Obamacare for the sake of political gamesmanship, two things which will never pass the Senate but will get out its base of crazies in 2014.

If you want the government to spy on you less, then VOTE FOR PEOPLE WHO WANT TO DEFUND THE MILITARY AND INTELLIGENCE ORGANIZATIONS.

Maybe we could even save a little cash too.


Yes but the Greens will never win! That's throwing your vote away!
 
2013-06-20 12:05:48 PM  

PanicMan: verbaltoxin: PanicMan: cefm: There's a world of difference between armed remote-control aircraft being used to kill people in foreign countries that we are not at war with and the use of remote-control aircraft here in the US for entertainment, for competition, to take mapping or survey photographs, to deliver pizza, or to take photo/video of a crime scene.

What the loonies in the media and Congress are doing very successfully right now is attempting to take the legitimate moral ethical and legal outrage over #1 and transfer it to #2 because it's the FBI and that means it's Obama and he bad.

No citizen of the United States has any legitimate reason to object to the FBI using a remote-control aircraft to take photos of, film, and otherwise provide situational awareness of a crime scene.  It's a 100% legitimate investigative tool and unless it somehow interferes with the FAA's flight paths (unlikely) it is 100% legal as it is currently used.

So go take a cold shower and rub one out on some Ayn Rand books, Mr. Tea-Bag idiot, there's no story here.

This this and this.  They fly a small UAV with a camera around active crime scenes.  That's perfectly legitimate.

Also, anyone who uses the term "drone" is probably not informed enough on the topic to speak inteligently.

I'm very infromed on the topic, though.

Whar flight certifct whar?


I have my own drone. It's the DHF-76 Patriotic.
 
2013-06-20 12:09:52 PM  

bdub77: The important thing is that all of these 'scandals' are really just a way to waste everyone's time on an issue that will never go away whilst simultaneously Congress does absolutely f*cking zero.


I've got an entire roll of aluminum foil that you can just have if you're willing to come over and get it.
 
2013-06-20 12:10:19 PM  
"...such drone use is done in a "very, very minimal way, and very seldom."

Yes, I'm raping you, but I only stick it in for 30 seconds, and only once a month. So we're good, right?
 
2013-06-20 12:10:52 PM  

Amish Tech Support: Ok America,

Why are we all suddenly enraged by something that has been going on for years?

So next week are we all going to discover the atrocities in Vietnam?


They'll forget about this as soon as Kim and Kanye show pics of their baby and start their own Kim, Kanye, and K-baby foundation.
 
2013-06-20 12:15:03 PM  
im not offended, shocked or scared im just amazed that anyone could sit thru watching my boring ass life.
 
2013-06-20 12:18:36 PM  

nmemkha: They can monitor me from the sky all they want. All they will discover is that I don't spend much time on my roof.


What "monitors from the sky" might see. So very SFW.

img.fark.net
 
2013-06-20 12:21:20 PM  

Voiceofreason01: bdub77: The important thing is that all of these 'scandals' are really just a way to waste everyone's time on an issue that will never go away whilst simultaneously Congress does absolutely f*cking zero.

I've got an entire roll of aluminum foil that you can just have if you're willing to come over and get it.


content.costco.com
 
2013-06-20 12:21:48 PM  

Krumet: "...such drone use is done in a "very, very minimal way, and very seldom."

Yes, I'm raping you, but I only stick it in for 30 seconds, and only once a month. So we're good, right?


does it hurt being that stupid or is it something you get used to eventually?
 
2013-06-20 12:24:31 PM  
"adding that such drone use is done in a "very, very minimal way, and very seldom."

Translation: They're recording EVERYTHING, EVERYWHERE, and they saw you fart in your house via infrared sensors.

i2.ytimg.com
 
2013-06-20 12:24:48 PM  
Did anyone else have the FBI and ahem the State Department on their college campus recruiting in the early 90s to staff carnivore?  Seriously, they had a booth at the job fair at ours.  It seems like ya got a signed picture of Reno for listening to their pitch, but I may be mistaken.  Just seeing if anyone else was witness to that.  Carnivore was their selling point.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnivore_(software)   just in case the ipod generation is shaking its head

/yes, is for real.
//is why all of this is so blase to me
///yawns again
 
2013-06-20 12:26:38 PM  

verbaltoxin: Voiceofreason01: bdub77: The important thing is that all of these 'scandals' are really just a way to waste everyone's time on an issue that will never go away whilst simultaneously Congress does absolutely f*cking zero.

I've got an entire roll of aluminum foil that you can just have if you're willing to come over and get it.

[content.costco.com image 300x300]


NO thanks, I make mine myself, ALCOA with the help of the NSA/CIA built in a way to get the mind-control waves through Reynolds and other aluminum foil wraps.
 
2013-06-20 12:29:19 PM  

IdBeCrazyIf: I'm still shocked that anyone is honestly still surprised at this


Right?!? Everyone go back to sleep and quit worrying about who the gov is looking at and killing and supporting around the globe.

It's all in your best interests and the best interests o' The Children.
 
2013-06-20 12:30:48 PM  
Bush is spying in 2007:
  -  Republicans: This is needed for security.
  -  Democrats: This is an outrage of liberty.

Obama is spying in 2013:
  -  Democatss: This is needed for security.
  -  Republicans: This is an outrage of liberty.

/trollface
 
2013-06-20 12:32:14 PM  
If they have a valid reason, and a warrant, why not? They have done this forever, drones, regular planes, choppers, who cares?
 
2013-06-20 12:34:34 PM  

Voiceofreason01: the FBI operating a handful of drones for legitimate (and legal) purposes isn't a big deal


You're making a rather large assumption that that's what's going on. In light of the NSA revelations, the Feds have zero credibility when they assure us that they're respecting civil liberties.
 
2013-06-20 12:36:06 PM  

Frank Bullitt it be: This is a travesty of our civil rights!Bush and Cheney should be impeached!Wait, what...? Ah, never mind.


Yeah its not Fascism not that Obama is doing it according to the Fark Liberals™
 
2013-06-20 12:38:14 PM  

TheShavingofOccam123


The FBI is videotaping my what?

I'm sorry but I don't understand. Whom should I call?


Ghostbusters.
 
2013-06-20 12:39:59 PM  

verbaltoxin


I'm very infromed on the topic, though.


Call him Ethan 'cause he's inFromed!
 
2013-06-20 12:41:48 PM  

Thunderpipes: If they have a valid reason, and a warrant, why not? They have done this forever, drones, regular planes, choppers, who cares?


If they're getting their warrant through the FISA kangaroo court which acts as a rubber stamp, there's no check to ensure that they have a valid reason. If they secure a warrant from a non-secret court (even if the warrant is sealed for a time) and the judge actually pulls his head out of his ass and weighs the probable cause alleged, then that's fine.

The fact that the US Government has recently asserted that it has the right to kill people at a whim overseas using such drones also is a source of concern. If murder is OK, why should the FBI be concerned about performing illegal searches in the US? They already have shotguns mounted on tactical police robots; how long will it be until they do the same with larger drones?
 
2013-06-20 12:46:17 PM  
Thing that worries me, is this administration is using government agencies like the DOJ, IRS, EPA to brazenly target politcal opponents. I could see them using drones to simply spy on conservatives.
 
2013-06-20 12:46:28 PM  
Has anyone figured out how many watchers we need?
Maybe can recruit on pizza boxes or sumptin,,,
Meet the new Department of Watching,,,
What qualifications do you need to watch the watchers watching,,,
 
2013-06-20 12:47:43 PM  
Well, at least they are using tape. By the time the drone lands, they eject the tape, pop it in the VHS, rewind, hit play, and adjust tracking... I will already have finished with my hookers and blow and be on the way to the clinic for my monthly std test. Nice try big brother! You lose again!
 
2013-06-20 12:47:51 PM  

Thunderpipes: Thing that worries me, is this administration is using government agencies like the DOJ, IRS, EPA to brazenly target politcal opponents. I could see them using drones to simply spy on conservatives.


Since the Cons do so little, what exactly are they gonna watch?
 
2013-06-20 12:48:27 PM  

snocone: Thunderpipes: Thing that worries me, is this administration is using government agencies like the DOJ, IRS, EPA to brazenly target politcal opponents. I could see them using drones to simply spy on conservatives.

Since the Cons do so little, what exactly are they gonna watch?


Hoverround on Hoverround action.
 
2013-06-20 12:50:36 PM  

Thunderpipes: Thing that worries me, is this administration is using government agencies like the DOJ, IRS, EPA to brazenly target politcal opponents. I could see them using drones to simply spy on conservatives.


It is brazen only because EVERYBODY does it, all the time, regularly, when it is their turn.
That standard practice is now no longer just a rumor, brazen.
 
2013-06-20 12:55:15 PM  

Oldiron_79: Frank Bullitt it be: This is a travesty of our civil rights!Bush and Cheney should be impeached!Wait, what...? Ah, never mind.

Yeah its not Fascism not that Obama is doing it according to the Fark Liberals™


Everyone knows that fascism can't exist in America. After all, America is a democracy. Or, wait... a republic? Whatever. Irregardless, the American government is  of the people and  for the people and  by the people and all that, so we'll never have federal agencies that disregard constitutional rights. It's not like we'd imprison people without due process, or murder American citizens without even a trial. And even if we did have such agencies, it's not like they have paramilitary armies that would descend on a city and march people out of their houses at gunpoint. Most importantly, if these agencies are spying on us, it's not like they'd use the information they gather for any reason other than catching terrorists. Duh.

Don't worry, politicians are on your side. Especially if those politicians align with your political ideology. Then they're definitely on your side and wouldn't do anything to harm you.
 
2013-06-20 12:59:10 PM  

Oldiron_79: Frank Bullitt it be: This is a travesty of our civil rights!Bush and Cheney should be impeached!Wait, what...? Ah, never mind.

Yeah its not Fascism not that Obama is doing it according to the Fark Liberals™


Just ignore all of them that are pissed at Obama about the NSA stuff.

This FBI using UAVs at active crime scenes is very "meh" on the outrage scale.

Wholesale harvesting of cell phone, email, and internet search history data on the other hand is a bit different, no matter how technically legal it is.

What part of "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. " is so hard for our government to understand.
 
2013-06-20 12:59:48 PM  
Thunderpipes: Thing that worries me, is this administration is using government agencies like the DOJ, IRS, EPA to brazenly target politcal opponents. I could see them using drones to simply spy on conservatives.   herp... derp... derp...

ftfy...
 
2013-06-20 01:01:03 PM  

bdub77: My privacy is being violated! I am totally going to update my Facebook status about this!


Are you really unaware that there is a difference between information freely given to an entity of you choice, and information taken without your permission by people you don't necessarily want to have that information?
 
2013-06-20 01:03:01 PM  

meat0918: Oldiron_79: Frank Bullitt it be: This is a travesty of our civil rights!Bush and Cheney should be impeached!Wait, what...? Ah, never mind.

Yeah its not Fascism not that Obama is doing it according to the Fark Liberals™

Just ignore all of them that are pissed at Obama about the NSA stuff.

This FBI using UAVs at active crime scenes is very "meh" on the outrage scale.

Wholesale harvesting of cell phone, email, and internet search history data on the other hand is a bit different, no matter how technically legal it is.

What part of "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. " is so hard for our government to understand.


Well, it is not the understanding, it is the not wanting it that way.
So, chip, chip, chip,
 
2013-06-20 01:03:43 PM  

cefm: There's a world of difference between armed remote-control aircraft being used to kill people in foreign countries that we are not at war with and the use of remote-control aircraft here in the US for entertainment, for competition, to take mapping or survey photographs, to deliver pizza, or to take photo/video of a crime scene.

What the loonies in the media and Congress are doing very successfully right now is attempting to take the legitimate moral ethical and legal outrage over #1 and transfer it to #2 because it's the FBI and that means it's Obama and he bad.

No citizen of the United States has any legitimate reason to object to the FBI using a remote-control aircraft to take photos of, film, and otherwise provide situational awareness of a crime scene.  It's a 100% legitimate investigative tool and unless it somehow interferes with the FAA's flight paths (unlikely) it is 100% legal as it is currently used.

So go take a cold shower and rub one out on some Ayn Rand books, Mr. Tea-Bag idiot, there's no story here.


This. Anyway, as far as we know, theNSA isn't "recording all of your phone calls and e-mails." I'm not saying they aren't, but the only information available is that they are only collecting records of who is talking to whom. They are specifically forbidden to read e-mails, and can wiretap only with a warrant.
 
2013-06-20 01:05:43 PM  

jjorsett: The day will shortly be here, if it isn't already, when all urban areas will be videotaped in high resolution 24/7 from surveillance aircraft or satellites. I've seen demonstrations of such a system in which individuals are identifiable or nearly so. It'll be essentially what London is trying to do, except they won't have to carpet a city with a gazillion individual cameras and there won't be any uncovered areas.


They tried to implement that here in lovely Dayton, Ohio.  Well, sort of: the official proposal included a loitering manned aircraft, but it would be a small step to remove the expensive pilot and utilize a drone.

http://www.aclu.org/blog/technology-and-liberty-national-security/oh io -aerial-surveillance-system-moving-forward-without

The Dayton City Commission declined the proposal, but since the area is a hotbed of drone and sensor research, I would not be surprised to see it resurface in the near future.
 
2013-06-20 01:15:12 PM  

DrPainMD: Is there anybody left who doesn't see that our greatest enemy (our only enemy, really) is our own government? Anybody?


Anyone who voted for Obama.
 
2013-06-20 01:16:50 PM  
I'm surprised that all these Americans enjoyed their overbearing, nosy, intrusive parents, who didn't knock before opening the door when the radio was on.

Aren't we all adults now?
 
2013-06-20 01:31:28 PM  
This is hardly a surprise. Drones have been used in the US as surveillance devices for years now, but they aren't the "everywhere, 24 hours a day" blanket coverage some pearl-clutchers here are worried about. Besides, once you're outside, you are no longer in a "private" area and are subject to being watched by the government in some manner.

I once toured a company outside of Elizabeth City, NC that was making aerostats (basically tethered blimps) used for detecting drug smuggling vehicles in the Gulf of Mexico. They were working in a gigantic WWII ASW blimp hangar and we only wanted to see the building; instead, we got a tour of their aerostat production facility. :(
 
2013-06-20 01:33:01 PM  
If the government, police and military are monitoring our calls, watching our internet usage, taping our activities from the skies, storing our DNA, and (insert other activities yet to be disclosed), why aren't they catching more criminals? All this data has to be revealing millions of crimes.
 
2013-06-20 01:33:45 PM  

Bastard Toadflax: This. Anyway, as far as we know, theNSA isn't "recording all of your phone calls and e-mails." I'm not saying they aren't, but the only information available is that they are only collecting records of who is talking to whom. They are specifically forbidden to read e-mails, and can wiretap only with a warrant.


There's a difference between reading them and recording them for possible later use pursuant to a bullshiat FISA warrant. They are now trying to obfuscate things by claiming that these are two separate programs that are being conflated, but given that the DNI perjured himself before Congress and that massive criminal activity on the part of the gov't is alleged, I tend to find Snowden a bit more credible on the subject.
 
2013-06-20 01:35:57 PM  
oi39.tinypic.com
 
2013-06-20 01:36:32 PM  

No Expectations: If the government, police and military are monitoring our calls, watching our internet usage, taping our activities from the skies, storing our DNA, and (insert other activities yet to be disclosed), why aren't they catching more criminals? All this data has to be revealing millions of crimes.


You assume that law enforcement is the purpose. That wasn't the purpose of most "FBI files" or Nixon's "Enemies List" a few decades ago either. This is far worse; the files and the list were not a matter of national policy.
 
2013-06-20 01:39:36 PM  

rkettens: Amish Tech Support: Ok America,

Why are we all suddenly enraged by something that has been going on for years?

So next week are we all going to discover the atrocities in Vietnam?

This


i wasn't ok with it then
i'm not now either

/doesn't seem to matter what i'm ok with
 
2013-06-20 01:43:17 PM  

durbnpoisn: IdBeCrazyIf: I'm still shocked that anyone is honestly still surprised at this

Yeah...  Done in one.

This is the thing...  And this is not paranoia speaking.  The gov't has been spying on it's own citizens since time out of mind.  And they will continue to.  This whole thing with congressional inquiries into the whole thing is a dog and pony show.  It means nothing.  It's just a way for the gov't to say, "WE'RE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT THIS INVASION OF PRIVACY!"  While all the while doing nothing of the sort.

Jerkoffs like Snowden that started this whole mess are really just making things worse and wasting more money.

The gov't is not looking through your emails, or tapping your calls, or looking through your windows with satellite cameras.  Why would they?  (Unless you have something to hide).

In other words, they could, but they only WOULD if given a reason.
And like it or not, there is not a damn thing you can do about it.  Complain all you want.  Rat out all the sources you want.  Question whoever you want.  The people in the background that have kept this going on for all this time will not be affected even in the slightest.


wow - while i don't hold a lot of hope that there is much to be done about this;  your solution is to lie back and take it?

well done citizen - move along now

that is painful and you should feel bad
 
2013-06-20 01:43:54 PM  
Feeling the Dr's hand on your shoulder during a rectal exam is nothing to worry about.  It's feeling the second hand on the other shoulder, mid exam, that should cause worry.
 
2013-06-20 01:50:04 PM  

EdNortonsTwin: Feeling the Dr's hand on your shoulder during a rectal exam is nothing to worry about.  It's feeling the second hand on the other shoulder, mid exam, that should cause worry.


You don't have much to worry about. Government workers have small penises.
 
2013-06-20 01:51:04 PM  

Noticeably F.A.T.: bdub77: My privacy is being violated! I am totally going to update my Facebook status about this!

Are you really unaware that there is a difference between information freely given to an entity of you choice, and information taken without your permission by people you don't necessarily want to have that information?


Of course not. But I find it ironic that the vast majority of people are generally happy with the status quo and yet are so upset about this, because they already gave their rights away more than a decade ago after 9/11 under the Patriot Act, they never voted the clowns who instituted it out of office, they continue to be fine with our huge military, including a huge presence in other countries (Syria being the latest flavor of the month) and meanwhile, they continue to give rights about their info away every day so they can play on their Xbox One or get gmail or go to Facebook or listen to music. Anyone connected to the world not living in a bunker somewhere has been giving their personal info to one corporate entity or another - why isn't that discussed? The EU has strong personal privacy laws? Why not us?

I would be the first to condemn Obama for his actions violating the 4th amendment. I don't like it one bit. I think it should be illegal under the Constitution. Unfortunately a majority of 9 people on the Supreme Court disagree with me. Don't like it? Well create a movement and throw these assclowns out of office.
 
2013-06-20 02:04:25 PM  

snocone: Thunderpipes: Thing that worries me, is this administration is using government agencies like the DOJ, IRS, EPA to brazenly target politcal opponents. I could see them using drones to simply spy on conservatives.

It is brazen only because EVERYBODY does it, all the time, regularly, when it is their turn.
That standard practice is now no longer just a rumor, brazen.


When did Bush do it?
 
2013-06-20 02:04:46 PM  

bdub77: Noticeably F.A.T.: bdub77: My privacy is being violated! I am totally going to update my Facebook status about this!

Are you really unaware that there is a difference between information freely given to an entity of you choice, and information taken without your permission by people you don't necessarily want to have that information?

Of course not. But I find it ironic that the vast majority of people are generally happy with the status quo and yet are so upset about this, because they already gave their rights away more than a decade ago after 9/11 under the Patriot Act, they never voted the clowns who instituted it out of office, they continue to be fine with our huge military, including a huge presence in other countries (Syria being the latest flavor of the month) and meanwhile, they continue to give rights about their info away every day so they can play on their Xbox One or get gmail or go to Facebook or listen to music. Anyone connected to the world not living in a bunker somewhere has been giving their personal info to one corporate entity or another - why isn't that discussed? The EU has strong personal privacy laws? Why not us?

I would be the first to condemn Obama for his actions violating the 4th amendment. I don't like it one bit. I think it should be illegal under the Constitution. Unfortunately a majority of 9 people on the Supreme Court disagree with me. Don't like it? Well create a movement and throw these assclowns out of office.


It looks like people are coming around.  I'm interested to see how large privacy is during the '14 midterms. It has a lot to do with what the media makes of it. The AP, NY TImes, and CBS seem to interested. CNN hasn't had the recent coverage that others have....
 
2013-06-20 02:09:02 PM  
megarian: 
Sure. What flavor kind of girl? I have a special on the ones that don't speak any of the romance languages.


Hmm that'll suffice. But will pay extra for any in cat outfits. Um, strictly for keeping away birds of course
 
2013-06-20 02:23:29 PM  
What was it like 6 months ago? You know, before the US government started spying on its own citizens?

Wait, what? It's been going on for decades? Never mind then.
 
2013-06-20 02:27:06 PM  

fullyautomatic: megarian: 
Sure. What flavor kind of girl? I have a special on the ones that don't speak any of the romance languages.


Hmm that'll suffice. But will pay extra for any in cat outfits. Um, strictly for keeping away birds of course


Of course. *exaggerated wink*
 
2013-06-20 02:43:24 PM  
It's for your safety.

img.fark.net

/Yeah, right.
 
2013-06-20 02:44:47 PM  

Thunderpipes: snocone: Thunderpipes: Thing that worries me, is this administration is using government agencies like the DOJ, IRS, EPA to brazenly target politcal opponents. I could see them using drones to simply spy on conservatives.

It is brazen only because EVERYBODY does it, all the time, regularly, when it is their turn.
That standard practice is now no longer just a rumor, brazen.

When did Bush do it?


That cast is wasted, fool.
Maybe add a lure to your line.
 
2013-06-20 02:45:30 PM  

joonyer: What was it like 6 months ago? You know, before the US government started spying on its own citizens?

Wait, what? It's been going on for decades? Never mind then.


I think this is a stance a lot of people actually take, and it's unfortunate. It's as though if something deplorable has been taking place for an extended period of time, it's somehow okay.

"Well, slavery  ispretty bad. But humans have been practicing it for centuries and centuries, so let's just accept it." (Continue with civil rights movement, women's rights movement, etc.)

"Well, governments have abused citizens rights for forever, so let's just accept it."
 
2013-06-20 02:47:03 PM  
I'm thinking of this song more and more these days: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vr6VVYnLXY
 
2013-06-20 02:58:52 PM  

bdub77: Of course not. But I find it ironic that the vast majority of people are generally happy with the status quo


That's a somewhat iffy claim. While a majority "support" the program, a larger majority are concerned enough to want public hearings on the matter.
 
2013-06-20 04:42:04 PM  
Your tax dollars at work.
 
2013-06-20 05:25:54 PM  

Miss Alexandra: Your tax dollars at work.


as opposed to all those tax dollars funding the never ending war machines, iraqi 'regime change', afghan warlords, tanks that the military doesn't want, jets that the military doesn't want
 
2013-06-20 05:42:51 PM  

Sofa King Smart: Miss Alexandra: Your tax dollars at work.

as opposed to all those tax dollars funding the never ending war machines, iraqi 'regime change', afghan warlords, tanks that the military doesn't want, jets that the military doesn't want


so this one is ok cause other bad examples exist?

you must also think that "getting into a van" is suspicious activity worthy of being monitored: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heterogenous_Aerial_Reconnaissance_Team
 
2013-06-20 06:12:31 PM  

diabloninja: Bush is spying in 2007:
  -  Republicans: This is needed for security.
  -  Democrats: This is an outrage of liberty.

Obama is spying in 2013:
  -  Democatss: This is needed for security.
  -  Republicans: This is an outrage of liberty.

/trollface


It's okay if your guy does it, ya know....
 
2013-06-20 07:17:43 PM  

skobot: joonyer: What was it like 6 months ago? You know, before the US government started spying on its own citizens?

Wait, what? It's been going on for decades? Never mind then.

I think this is a stance a lot of people actually take, and it's unfortunate. It's as though if something deplorable has been taking place for an extended period of time, it's somehow okay.

"Well, slavery  ispretty bad. But humans have been practicing it for centuries and centuries, so let's just accept it." (Continue with civil rights movement, women's rights movement, etc.)

"Well, governments have abused citizens rights for forever, so let's just accept it."


This is how I feel. It's not unfortunate, it's rational. Governments DO abuse citizen rights. Every government ever. Not saying it's right.

How realistic is it to expect private citizens to be able to change laws pertaining to national security in today's United States? Do you think national security legislation gets changed or reversed because someone protests or writes a letter? Personally I think it's a bit naive to think that a government would ever willingly give up power/authority once it is given to them, especially when pertaining to national security. Not sure there's a precedent for that one.

My point is: They've already got the power, and have for a long long time.
 
2013-06-20 07:24:49 PM  

Sofa King Smart: Miss Alexandra: Your tax dollars at work.

as opposed to all those tax dollars funding the never ending war machines, iraqi 'regime change', afghan warlords, tanks that the military doesn't want, jets that the military doesn't want


Blame it on the USSR. We've been taking up their slack for the last 25 years.
 
2013-06-20 10:25:09 PM  

inner ted: Sofa King Smart: Miss Alexandra: Your tax dollars at work.

as opposed to all those tax dollars funding the never ending war machines, iraqi 'regime change', afghan warlords, tanks that the military doesn't want, jets that the military doesn't want

so this one is ok cause other bad examples exist?

you must also think that "getting into a van" is suspicious activity worthy of being monitored: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heterogenous_Aerial_Reconnaissance_Team


I didn't say this one was 'OK'... but in terms of 'my tax dollars at work'... this is a drop in the bucket even compared to the $7 BILLION dollars worth of equipment they are preparing to destroy in Afghanistan because it would be too expensive to ship it anywhere or let the afghani military use it... this isn't 'nam there are rules!
 
2013-06-20 10:26:35 PM  

uber humper: Sofa King Smart: Miss Alexandra: Your tax dollars at work.

as opposed to all those tax dollars funding the never ending war machines, iraqi 'regime change', afghan warlords, tanks that the military doesn't want, jets that the military doesn't want

Blame it on the USSR. We've been taking up their slack for the last 25 years.


commie slackers... no work ethic... that's their problem... always drinking their vodak...
 
2013-06-20 11:39:18 PM  
generallyso
2013-06-20 11:28:09 AM


Amish Tech Support: Ok America,

Why are we all suddenly enraged by something that has been going on for years?

Because now Fox is covering it.

Sort of like how you all are nonplussed now that it's obama listening in, rather than Bush.
 
2013-06-21 12:07:25 AM  
They're videotaping my what?
 
2013-06-21 07:38:10 AM  

Voiceofreason01: durbnpoisn: IdBeCrazyIf: I'm still shocked that anyone is honestly still surprised at this

Yeah...  Done in one.

This is the thing...  And this is not paranoia speaking.  The gov't has been spying on it's own citizens since time out of mind.  And they will continue to.  This whole thing with congressional inquiries into the whole thing is a dog and pony show.  It means nothing.  It's just a way for the gov't to say, "WE'RE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT THIS INVASION OF PRIVACY!"  While all the while doing nothing of the sort.

Jerkoffs like Snowden that started this whole mess are really just making things worse and wasting more money.

The gov't is not looking through your emails, or tapping your calls, or looking through your windows with satellite cameras.  Why would they?  (Unless you have something to hide).

In other words, they could, but they only WOULD if given a reason.
And like it or not, there is not a damn thing you can do about it.  Complain all you want.  Rat out all the sources you want.  Question whoever you want.  The people in the background that have kept this going on for all this time will not be affected even in the slightest.

bullshiat. You should be outraged about the NSA thing. There are common rules that we all have to follow and the NSA doesn't get to ignore them just because it's convenient for them to do so. That being said, the FBI operating a handful of drones for legitimate (and legal) purposes isn't a big deal.


bullshiat.  you're an alarmist and just need something to be all outragey about
 
2013-06-21 07:40:41 AM  
nothing new folks.  cheaper to do it with UAVs, that's all...

unbunch your panties and find new outrage.
 
2013-06-21 07:43:06 AM  
img.fark.net
 
2013-06-21 01:54:54 PM  

Sofa King Smart: inner ted: Sofa King Smart: Miss Alexandra: Your tax dollars at work.

as opposed to all those tax dollars funding the never ending war machines, iraqi 'regime change', afghan warlords, tanks that the military doesn't want, jets that the military doesn't want

so this one is ok cause other bad examples exist?

you must also think that "getting into a van" is suspicious activity worthy of being monitored: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heterogenous_Aerial_Reconnaissance_Team

I didn't say this one was 'OK'... but in terms of 'my tax dollars at work'... this is a drop in the bucket even compared to the $7 BILLION dollars worth of equipment they are preparing to destroy in Afghanistan because it would be too expensive to ship it anywhere or let the afghani military use it... this isn't 'nam there are rules!


Pretty much the same bullchit we had in 'Nam.
Choppers, vehicles of all types, hospitals, et.al.
 
Displayed 133 of 133 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report