2farknfunny: I assume this will be the night's shortest thread.
cman: DAMMIT ORTON
porterm: they will trot out any darn pony they can to make this look like a good deal
Satanic_Hamster: 2farknfunny: I assume this will be the night's shortest thread.We could have a thread on all the women you've pleased sexually.
Fissile: Of course health care costs fell, the sick/old are being sent off to Obama death camps.
great_tigers: Because health cost benefits have decreased for those working. An MRI for my wife three years ago would have been an out of pocket cost of 100 bucks. Now it is 1100, we are too scared to see what her hip surgery will cost. We are choosing to deal with it.
hammettman: Just wait 'til doctors start treating Republican butthurt.
DeejayMental: The calm before the storm.
2farknfunny: Satanic_Hamster: 2farknfunny: I assume this will be the night's shortest thread.We could have a thread on all the women you've pleased sexually.well, there's your mom...
rkiller1: A one month year-over-year decrease in the medical costs inflation RATE does not a reduction make.
Benjimin_Dover: So an article gives credit to something that hasn't gone into effect yet and people are lapping it up like dooshes. Just another repeat of the same old dog and pony show.
StopLurkListen: rkiller1: A one month year-over-year decrease in the medical costs inflation RATE does not a reduction make.Valid point, but I don't know which point is true, the article is inconsistent.
Iron Felix: Try going to work for a great company with a great insurance plan. Then you get laid off unexpectedly and cobra costs your family $1900/month. Healthcare in the US is an absolute joke.
Wolfmanjames: Forgive me, subby if I fail to trust implicitly a source that declares itself, 'Real Liberal Politics' when it cheers Obamacare.
Dusk-You-n-Me: Wolfmanjames: Forgive me, subby if I fail to trust implicitly a source that declares itself, 'Real Liberal Politics' when it cheers Obamacare.You read that but didn't see their source? The super liberal WSJ
big pig peaches: And the WSJ blog got the numbers from the department of labor and we know those guys never play with the numbers to make things look better. Not ever.
js34603: So what specifically did the ACA implement that resulted in these lower costs?It hasn't even been fully put into effect yet. So what part of what has been implemented led to lower costs?
If you like these links, you'll love
All the submissions, none of the calories.
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Sep 25 2017 09:45:45
Runtime: 0.635 sec (634 ms)