If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CNN)   Common wisdom: No one can erase ALL porn from the Internet. Google: Challenge accepted   (cnn.com) divider line 15
    More: Interesting, internet, Google, Exploited Children, search algorithms, challenge accepted, child pornography  
•       •       •

6542 clicks; posted to Geek » on 17 Jun 2013 at 1:59 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-06-17 02:12:57 PM
6 votes:
www.geekfill.com
/hot
2013-06-17 12:41:00 PM
4 votes:

R.A.Danny: Finding one less titty on the internet is not an infringement on your rights.


Woah, woah.

I don't want any one-titted women in my porn, SIR.
2013-06-17 02:40:28 PM
2 votes:

Virtual Pariah: Burr: Virtual Pariah: Voiceofreason01: On the one hand child abuse is a terrible thing but on the other censorship in any form is a very dangerous thing. I'm not sure how I feel about this.

Yeah.

I'm of two minds about this.

Child Porn = Bad.
Govt or Corp Censorship = Bad.

The censorship comes with a free frogurt!

That's Good.


The frogurt has been bugged by the NSA
2013-06-17 02:19:03 PM
2 votes:
All I got out of it was google's holding a db of child porn images and is willing to share it with anyone who pretends to care about child safety... =/
2013-06-17 12:55:31 PM
2 votes:

jehovahs witness protection: Relatively Obscure: R.A.Danny: Finding one less titty on the internet is not an infringement on your rights.

Woah, woah.

I don't want any one-titted women in my porn, SIR.

Why not?
[denver.metromix.com image 247x370]


Is that to balance out the chick from Total Recall?  Is that a lesser known law of physics, universal conservation of tits?

/Also, GISing 'one titted woman' led to this (NSFW and the most WTF thing I've seen in a while)
2013-06-17 06:13:43 PM
1 votes:
Wait until states start asking Google to block information on abortion.
2013-06-17 04:13:19 PM
1 votes:

TuteTibiImperes: jehovahs witness protection: Relatively Obscure: R.A.Danny: Finding one less titty on the internet is not an infringement on your rights.

Woah, woah.

I don't want any one-titted women in my porn, SIR.

Why not?
[denver.metromix.com image 247x370]

Is that to balance out the chick from Total Recall?  Is that a lesser known law of physics, universal conservation of tits?

/Also, GISing 'one titted woman' led to this (NSFW and the most WTF thing I've seen in a while)


Which one of you assholes showed the conservatives how to use Photoshop?
2013-06-17 03:19:56 PM
1 votes:
They want to erase all child porn, or just keep it all for themselves?
2013-06-17 03:05:49 PM
1 votes:
Does this give new meaning to the Bing it on Challenge?


/AOL IS the internet Damnit!
2013-06-17 02:18:44 PM
1 votes:

Burr: Virtual Pariah: Voiceofreason01: On the one hand child abuse is a terrible thing but on the other censorship in any form is a very dangerous thing. I'm not sure how I feel about this.

Yeah.

I'm of two minds about this.

Child Porn = Bad.
Govt or Corp Censorship = Bad.

The censorship comes with a free frogurt!


That's Good.
2013-06-17 02:07:27 PM
1 votes:
Google says it will spend ... $2 million to research more effective ways to find [child porn] images.

That's all I took from this.
2013-06-17 02:01:58 PM
1 votes:

TuteTibiImperes: jehovahs witness protection: Relatively Obscure: R.A.Danny: Finding one less titty on the internet is not an infringement on your rights.

Woah, woah.

I don't want any one-titted women in my porn, SIR.

Why not?
[denver.metromix.com image 247x370]

Is that to balance out the chick from Total Recall?  Is that a lesser known law of physics, universal conservation of tits?

/Also, GISing 'one titted woman' led to this (NSFW and the most WTF thing I've seen in a while)


Damn, that is funny as hell. I kinda of scared of the mind that created it though.
2013-06-17 01:59:16 PM
1 votes:
Umm, Subby? What does it say about you when the article says Google wants to get rid of child porn and you interpret that as Google trying to get rid of all porn?

/Chris Hansen wants you to take a seat.
2013-06-17 12:41:35 PM
1 votes:
... Or DO I?

/...
//*Google*
2013-06-17 12:26:59 PM
1 votes:

Voiceofreason01: Relatively Obscure: Voiceofreason01: On the one hand child abuse is a terrible thing but on the other censorship in any form is a very dangerous thing. I'm not sure how I feel about this.

We already censor child porn.  We just suck at it.

and we have the first of many responses from people who did not read the article.


Reading is for nerds.
 
Displayed 15 of 15 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report