flemardo: That is crap. I'm sure it is hard to tell average bites apart but I can see it as a way to exclude. Bite abnormalities should be used, crap like doubled teeth, extreme gaps, missing teeth can easily include and exclude people from the potential list. You shouldn't be able to prosecute with it but it should be a useful tool.
CygnusDarius: This only makes us more vulnerable to vampire attacks.
BafflerMeal: Good. Bite marks have the least 'science' of any of the CSI methods everyone feels are awesome. Hair analysis is next on the list.
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Jan 18 2017 20:35:09
Runtime: 0.183 sec (183 ms)