If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Deadline)   Man of Steel is the #1 film at the box office, earning $125 in green kryptonite at the US box office. This is the End is a distant #2 and Now You See Me slips unseen into the #3 spot   (deadline.com) divider line 226
    More: Followup, Man of Steel, kryptonite, box offices, Los Angeles Film Festival, humans, Iron Man, Kim Kardashian, Superman reboot  
•       •       •

1573 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 16 Jun 2013 at 11:44 AM (43 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



226 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-06-16 07:22:35 AM
I am going to assume that subby wrote a terrible headline as part of some Farkism that I am not awate of.
 
2013-06-16 08:25:47 AM
I'm sure Superman is a decent enough film, but seriously check out This is the End if you're looking for a good laugh.
 
#2 [TotalFark]
2013-06-16 09:01:28 AM
This is the End for #2?

/ Better get crackin' on my bucket list......
 
2013-06-16 09:06:51 AM
going to see this is the end today. looks hilarious.
 
2013-06-16 09:34:19 AM

Altair: I am going to assume that subby wrote a terrible headline as part of some Farkism that I am not awate of.


This happens every weekend. Same source, same snark. Probably the same subby too.
 
2013-06-16 10:55:34 AM
Loved MoS.  It did a great job of capturing the idealism of Superman without making him a hokey boy scout.
 
2013-06-16 11:48:05 AM
MoS was ok. Good enough for a sequel but origin stories for characters everyone knows about tend to bore me.

/batman begins was the exception
 
2013-06-16 11:48:07 AM
Jesus Christ these box office headlines are horrible. Just awful, I feel like I have 80s Entertainment News Desk Teaser Bumper Juice all over me. And not in the good way like you want.
 
2013-06-16 11:49:18 AM

Lost Thought 00: I'm sure Superman is a decent enough film, but seriously check out This is the End if you're looking for a good laugh.


Seriously. I didn't know a lot about it going in (and expected a Pineapple Express-ish vibe based on the cast and premise), but it was hysterical. It reminded me of Shaun of the Dead more than anything else.
 
2013-06-16 11:50:10 AM
That just means This is The End is the #1 comedy in the country and Now You See Me is the #1 magicians robbing banks movie, and The Purge is #1 stupid social commentary/home invasion movie.
 
2013-06-16 11:50:32 AM
I didn't like MoS. I didn't get why Superman and the bad guys spent half the movie punching each other through buildings, when it's clear they couldn't hurt each other by punching.

I'm looking forward to next week though, with World War Z and Monsters University.
 
2013-06-16 11:52:23 AM
And Star Trek: Into Crapness warps off into box office failure.
 
2013-06-16 11:52:35 AM

skazzytl: I didn't like MoS. I didn't get why Superman and the bad guys spent half the movie punching each other through buildings, when it's clear they couldn't hurt each other by punching.

I'm looking forward to next week though, with World War Z and Monsters University.


That is the problem with doing a serious superman movie. The character is too obscenely powerful to take serious but they still need to do something the viewers can relate to for action scenes. Nolan's Batman can't exist in the same world as a superman but they really want him to for Justice League.
 
2013-06-16 11:52:53 AM
$125.

125 dollars.

seems a little under-performing.
 
2013-06-16 11:54:17 AM

Bslim: And Star Trek: Into Crapness warps off into box office failure.


If by failure you mean the highest grossing star trek film ever than I guess so?
 
2013-06-16 11:54:40 AM

Carth: skazzytl: I didn't like MoS. I didn't get why Superman and the bad guys spent half the movie punching each other through buildings, when it's clear they couldn't hurt each other by punching.

I'm looking forward to next week though, with World War Z and Monsters University.

That is the problem with doing a serious superman movie. The character is too obscenely powerful to take serious but they still need to do something the viewers can relate to for action scenes. Nolan's Batman can't exist in the same world as a superman but they really want him to for Justice League.


Well, if you think back, he was having trouble holding up a collapsing rig.  Something that would be ridiculously easy for the Superman of Superman Returns or any of the others.

He's not as strong in MoS as he is in all the others.  I suspect that's on purpose, too.
 
2013-06-16 11:55:39 AM
$125, eh subby? That's more than your mom.
 
2013-06-16 11:59:39 AM
Saw MoS last night. I went in expecting a fun, comic book movie and that's exactly what I got. It was satisfying and I'll more than likely see it again.
 
2013-06-16 12:01:59 PM
And how did The Bling Ring do? I saw that MOS and This in the End yesterday. All were amazing. Thank you AMC lowes Lincoln for making them all so easy to see. One after another.
 
2013-06-16 12:02:12 PM

Infernalist: Carth: skazzytl: I didn't like MoS. I didn't get why Superman and the bad guys spent half the movie punching each other through buildings, when it's clear they couldn't hurt each other by punching.

I'm looking forward to next week though, with World War Z and Monsters University.

That is the problem with doing a serious superman movie. The character is too obscenely powerful to take serious but they still need to do something the viewers can relate to for action scenes. Nolan's Batman can't exist in the same world as a superman but they really want him to for Justice League.

Well, if you think back, he was having trouble holding up a collapsing rig.  Something that would be ridiculously easy for the Superman of Superman Returns or any of the others.

He's not as strong in MoS as he is in all the others.  I suspect that's on purpose, too.


He wasn't strong then. The whole first half of the movie was about him honing his skills and strengths. Also that shiat was melting underneath him which might have played a part.

Carth: Bslim: And Star Trek: Into Crapness warps off into box office failure.

If by failure you mean the highest grossing star trek film ever than I guess so?


Too bad for Star Trek it doesn't have the global appeal that many, MANY other summer blockbusters do. Too bad for Star Trek Into Darkness that it will not outgross its predecessor in the US, despite spending $40 million more to make it. Failure? No. Success? No.
 
2013-06-16 12:04:47 PM
taxandspend:
Carth: Bslim: And Star Trek: Into Crapness warps off into box office failure.

If by failure you mean the highest grossing star trek film ever than I guess so?

Too bad for Star Trek it doesn't have the global appeal that many, MANY other summer blockbusters do. Too bad for Star Trek Into Darkness that it will not outgross its predecessor in the US, despite spending $40 million more to make it. Failure? No. Success? No.


It wasn't a huge success but anyone calling it a failure is deluding themselves. It was favorably received by critics and audiences and it made a profit. I'd be amazed if we don't see another move in 3-4 years.
 
2013-06-16 12:11:46 PM
I want to see This Is the End, but I don't really see it as a movie that MUST be seen in the theaters. At $22 for both my wife and I to go to the theater together, it almost makes more sense to wait four months or so and just grab the Blu-Ray.
 
2013-06-16 12:14:57 PM

Carth: taxandspend:
Carth: Bslim: And Star Trek: Into Crapness warps off into box office failure.

If by failure you mean the highest grossing star trek film ever than I guess so?

Too bad for Star Trek it doesn't have the global appeal that many, MANY other summer blockbusters do. Too bad for Star Trek Into Darkness that it will not outgross its predecessor in the US, despite spending $40 million more to make it. Failure? No. Success? No.

It wasn't a huge success but anyone calling it a failure is deluding themselves. It was favorably received by critics and audiences and it made a profit. I'd be amazed if we don't see another move in 3-4 years.


It did make a profit (depending on how much they paid for advertising and lord knows the Star Trek video game tie in died a quick death). The question is did it make enough of a profit to justify making another movie with perhaps an even bigger budget? My friends who work at Disney are going through the same debate right now with producing a sequel to Oz: The Great and Powerful. That movie was expensive to make, expensive to market and everything they borrowed from The Wizard of Oz had to not only be approved by MGM but a lot of it had to paid for (You want a Wicked Witch with green skin? That'll be $1,000,000 for MGM please). Now they're trying to figure out if it's worth it to make a sequel. The people behind Star Trek may feel the same way because it looks as though there is a market cap on people who give a shiat about Star Trek and it costs lots of money to build a brand overseas.
 
2013-06-16 12:20:06 PM
I'd go see This Is The End just to watch Jonah Hill getting raped by a demon. After attacking the world with that inexcusable piece of sh*t called Allen Gregory, it's truly a fitting punishment.

www.awn.com
 
2013-06-16 12:22:02 PM
So, despite being able to defeat this iron man:

interactivemediawriting.files.wordpress.com

Superman was no match for THIS Iron Man:

www.geekrest.com
 
2013-06-16 12:25:41 PM
I like "The Purge" better when it was the premise of a 47 year old Star Trek TOS episode:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ao9Wxov9lQM
 
2013-06-16 12:30:07 PM
Heh. Next week is WWZ? I can't wait for the flood of Fark headlines saying it will suck. I'll probably rent it, but I wish they had kept the individual story style of the book.

And maybe it will look better in the movies than in a 30 second film clip, but it just looks awkward that zombies would flow/move together like water. Unless the zombies somehow grew claws and grappling things when they transformed, how in the hell can they grab on to things like they were squirrels?
 
2013-06-16 12:30:08 PM
Anyone else notice that a few of the trucks in MOS said LexCorp or that a satellite said Wayne Enterprises?  And apparently there was a quick reference to S.T.A.R Labs.
 
2013-06-16 12:34:45 PM
My wife and daughter took me to see MoS in 3D at the IMAX. It took a while to get going, and the fight scenes do move rather rapidly, sometimes too rapidly to really appreciate but it was a fun enough movie. They had the sound just cranked in there, too. It was as loud as any rock concert I've ever attended.
 
2013-06-16 12:35:14 PM

Mad_Radhu: I want to see This Is the End, but I don't really see it as a movie that MUST be seen in the theaters. At $22 for both my wife and I to go to the theater together, it almost makes more sense to wait four months or so and just grab the Blu-Ray.


Is Olive Garden too expensive for you?  Do you guys dress up to go to McDonald's for dinner on those "special occasions"?
 
2013-06-16 12:37:48 PM
Spoilers:

Loved MoS.  It did a good job of depicting the type of carnage you would expect if gods suddenly fell to earth and started fighting.  And while the Jesus imagery was a bit ham-handed, I liked the way they addressed the theme of America's drone war as well as the way they portrayed Zod as a slightly more sympathetic version of Dick Cheney.  I also liked the idea of Zod and Jor-El as the black swans of the Codex who followed their genetic programming so single-mindedly that they stepped beyond the confines of Kryptonian society.
 
2013-06-16 12:38:45 PM
Man, I'm increasingly feeling like I'm in the minority of people who just didn't care for MoS.
 
2013-06-16 12:39:18 PM

texdent: Anyone else notice that a few of the trucks in MOS said LexCorp or that a satellite said Wayne Enterprises?  And apparently there was a quick reference to S.T.A.R Labs.


One of the buildings was also LexCorps headquarters.
 
2013-06-16 12:39:35 PM

Fade2black: Mad_Radhu: I want to see This Is the End, but I don't really see it as a movie that MUST be seen in the theaters. At $22 for both my wife and I to go to the theater together, it almost makes more sense to wait four months or so and just grab the Blu-Ray.

Is Olive Garden too expensive for you?  Do you guys dress up to go to McDonald's for dinner on those "special occasions"?


$22 isn't a lot of money. I still wouldn't piss on it and set it on fire.
 
2013-06-16 12:41:42 PM

Gaambit: Man, I'm increasingly feeling like I'm in the minority of people who just didn't care for MoS.


As it should be.
 
2013-06-16 12:42:02 PM
I am sure I stand alone on this but Man of Steel was terrible.
 
2013-06-16 12:43:38 PM

js34603: Fade2black: Mad_Radhu: I want to see This Is the End, but I don't really see it as a movie that MUST be seen in the theaters. At $22 for both my wife and I to go to the theater together, it almost makes more sense to wait four months or so and just grab the Blu-Ray.

Is Olive Garden too expensive for you?  Do you guys dress up to go to McDonald's for dinner on those "special occasions"?

$22 isn't a lot of money. I still wouldn't piss on it and set it on fire.


Hell, $5 isn't a lot of money but I still don't waste it and subscribe to total fark.
 
2013-06-16 12:44:30 PM

Fade2black: Mad_Radhu: I want to see This Is the End, but I don't really see it as a movie that MUST be seen in the theaters. At $22 for both my wife and I to go to the theater together, it almost makes more sense to wait four months or so and just grab the Blu-Ray.

Is Olive Garden too expensive for you?  Do you guys dress up to go to McDonald's for dinner on those "special occasions"?


With the small window between theatrical and home video releases and the small price differences between watching a movie once and owning it on Blu-Ray, you just have to really give it some thought when you go see a movie these days. Sure, we can afford it, but unless it is a huge release with a lot of eye candy that we REALLY want to see on the big screen, we just wind up thinking that there are better things we can spend our money on. Just because we make a combined 6-figure income doesn't mean we need to throw money at the movie theater unnecessarily.
 
2013-06-16 12:46:37 PM
0.media.collegehumor.cvcdn.com
 
2013-06-16 12:48:13 PM
Man of Steel just felt "off" to me. By all means, it's a really good effort by all the creative types involved, but the film just left me feeling really cold and numb. With the level of carnage and destruction featured, there is a lot of collateral damage (ie: civilian casualties) that is directly caused by Superman himself. I mean, realistically, when you have cosmic level super-beings going at it, a lot of innocent people are going to get caught in the crossfire, but I would think that Superman would have more sense to NOT punch the bad guy into the 7-Eleven gas station, sending up a fireball explosion that levels an entire city block.

Meanwhile, when Superman isn't conflicted about any of this until later in the film, where he actually has to choose. Am I wrong about any of this?
 
2013-06-16 12:51:51 PM

Lost Thought 00: I'm sure Superman is a decent enough film, but seriously check out This is the End if you're looking for a good laugh.


THIS!

I haven't laughed so hard at a movie in years!  This is the End is farkin' hilarious!

Man of Steel was OK, and I'm glad I saw it on a big screen rather than waiting for cable.  Not sure the 3D was worth it, but whatever.
 
2013-06-16 12:54:46 PM
Man of Steel > The Dark Knight > The Avengers
 
2013-06-16 12:55:37 PM

Toquinha: Man of Steel just felt "off" to me. By all means, it's a really good effort by all the creative types involved, but the film just left me feeling really cold and numb. With the level of carnage and destruction featured, there is a lot of collateral damage (ie: civilian casualties) that is directly caused by Superman himself. I mean, realistically, when you have cosmic level super-beings going at it, a lot of innocent people are going to get caught in the crossfire, but I would think that Superman would have more sense to NOT punch the bad guy into the 7-Eleven gas station, sending up a fireball explosion that levels an entire city block.

Meanwhile, when Superman isn't conflicted about any of this until later in the film, where he actually has to choose. Am I wrong about any of this?


Man of Steel taught us all a valuable lesson on how to survive three god-like entities fighting in small town America: Stay off that one street and keep out of any building that paid to be a part of the movie.
 
2013-06-16 12:56:40 PM

Toquinha: Man of Steel just felt "off" to me. By all means, it's a really good effort by all the creative types involved, but the film just left me feeling really cold and numb. With the level of carnage and destruction featured, there is a lot of collateral damage (ie: civilian casualties) that is directly caused by Superman himself. I mean, realistically, when you have cosmic level super-beings going at it, a lot of innocent people are going to get caught in the crossfire, but I would think that Superman would have more sense to NOT punch the bad guy into the 7-Eleven gas station, sending up a fireball explosion that levels an entire city block.

Meanwhile, when Superman isn't conflicted about any of this until later in the film, where he actually has to choose. Am I wrong about any of this?


(spoilers ahead)

Ya know...this same thing occurred to me while I was watching it. They basically leveled Metropolis and then totally bleeped right over the fact that giant buildings falling down would probably result in massive amounts of dead citizens. The real time rebuilding of a city that size would take decades, yet he shows up at the Daily Planet at the very end and the office is all "business as usual" with no real reference to the destruction of before.

Yea, I know...it's "Superman" and it's based on a comic book, but after 9/11, I think people are a little more in tune to what happens when massive skyscrapers get knocked over. I'm really surprised the film makers weren't more aware of that.
 
2013-06-16 12:59:32 PM
More spoilers ahead

At least Lois knows about Clark so we don't have to go through the whole 'what dumb scheme will Lois do to try to reveal Superman's secret identity' plots.
 
2013-06-16 12:59:51 PM

zappaisfrank: Toquinha: Man of Steel just felt "off" to me. By all means, it's a really good effort by all the creative types involved, but the film just left me feeling really cold and numb. With the level of carnage and destruction featured, there is a lot of collateral damage (ie: civilian casualties) that is directly caused by Superman himself. I mean, realistically, when you have cosmic level super-beings going at it, a lot of innocent people are going to get caught in the crossfire, but I would think that Superman would have more sense to NOT punch the bad guy into the 7-Eleven gas station, sending up a fireball explosion that levels an entire city block.

Meanwhile, when Superman isn't conflicted about any of this until later in the film, where he actually has to choose. Am I wrong about any of this?

(spoilers ahead)

Ya know...this same thing occurred to me while I was watching it. They basically leveled Metropolis and then totally bleeped right over the fact that giant buildings falling down would probably result in massive amounts of dead citizens. The real time rebuilding of a city that size would take decades, yet he shows up at the Daily Planet at the very end and the office is all "business as usual" with no real reference to the destruction of before.

Yea, I know...it's "Superman" and it's based on a comic book, but after 9/11, I think people are a little more in tune to what happens when massive skyscrapers get knocked over. I'm really surprised the film makers weren't more aware of that.


Maybe DC has their own version of Damage Control who specializes in rebuilding after the destruction caused by super humans.
 
2013-06-16 01:02:37 PM
Went to see Man of Steel, but it was sold out, so I ventured over to see This is the End...

Best. Consolation. Movie. Evar!!!  Laughed my ass off from start to finish.

/Going to see Man of Steel today
 
2013-06-16 01:04:38 PM

taxandspend: Toquinha: Man of Steel just felt "off" to me. By all means, it's a really good effort by all the creative types involved, but the film just left me feeling really cold and numb. With the level of carnage and destruction featured, there is a lot of collateral damage (ie: civilian casualties) that is directly caused by Superman himself. I mean, realistically, when you have cosmic level super-beings going at it, a lot of innocent people are going to get caught in the crossfire, but I would think that Superman would have more sense to NOT punch the bad guy into the 7-Eleven gas station, sending up a fireball explosion that levels an entire city block.

Meanwhile, when Superman isn't conflicted about any of this until later in the film, where he actually has to choose. Am I wrong about any of this?

Man of Steel taught us all a valuable lesson on how to survive three god-like entities fighting in small town America: Stay off that one street and keep out of any building that paid to be a part of the movie.


And hiding under an overpass is the best way to survive a tornado.
 
2013-06-16 01:10:05 PM

Mentat: And hiding under an overpass is the best way to survive a tornado.


That's the one thing in the movie that made me say WTF?
 
2013-06-16 01:11:21 PM
This is the End was solid comedy, though the third act really sort of lost its way.
 
Displayed 50 of 226 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report