If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Daily Mail)   Don't know if weird or stupid- That Michael Jackson's ghost makes a statement while being channelled through Lionel Ritchies ex-wife, or that a judge in California has accepted this as legal evidence. Why yes, money IS involved   (dailymail.co.uk) divider line 7
    More: Stupid, Michael Jackson, Superior Court of Los Angeles County, lawsuits, Dr. Conrad Murray, Randy Phillips, wrongful deaths, superior courts, anesthetics  
•       •       •

6916 clicks; posted to Main » on 15 Jun 2013 at 6:11 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
ZAZ [TotalFark]
2013-06-15 02:43:29 PM
4 votes:
A lawyer representing the Jackson family reportedly objected to the evidence, claiming it was 'triple hearsay', as the conversation was relayed to Branda Richie through the assistance of a medium. But the judge let the evidence stand nonetheless.

Pop quiz time, law school students. You are on the panel reviewing the jury verdict on appeal. You have a preserved objection to the medium-relayed spiritual hearsay. Do you

a. Reverse for legal error

b. Affirm because the jury would have had to be nuts to take the statement seriously

or

c. Take another puff of state-legal medical marijuana and hope your headache goes away

?
2013-06-15 03:32:56 PM
3 votes:
Talking to the dead is easy, like Sunday morning.
2013-06-15 02:54:27 PM
2 votes:
Now would Michael Jackson's ghost appear as the black guy he was born as or the plastic monstrosity he turned himself into? Sort of like Anakin Skywalker's ghost, would he appear as the old guy in the original, Hayden Christensen or just a torso? The ghost stuff, how does it work?
2013-06-15 10:20:53 PM
1 votes:
It's true, this man has no dick
2013-06-15 06:34:56 PM
1 votes:

Bucky Katt: Weird or stupd: anyone takes seriously anything the Daily Fail has to say on this subject.


Here's a more reliable link on the story:

MICHAEL JACKSON'S GHOST TESTIFIES IN TRIAL

Seriously, that's the next link that comes up after the mail when I Google "Michael Jackson trial ghost evidence".
2013-06-15 06:33:32 PM
1 votes:
To be fair, while possessed Lionel Ritchie's ex-wife demanded a shot of morphine in her spine and a small boy.  Sounds pretty legit.
2013-06-15 06:13:20 PM
1 votes:

ZAZ: A lawyer representing the Jackson family reportedly objected to the evidence, claiming it was 'triple hearsay', as the conversation was relayed to Branda Richie through the assistance of a medium. But the judge let the evidence stand nonetheless.

Pop quiz time, law school students. You are on the panel reviewing the jury verdict on appeal. You have a preserved objection to the medium-relayed spiritual hearsay. Do you

a. Reverse for legal error

b. Affirm because the jury would have had to be nuts to take the statement seriously

or

c. Take another puff of state-legal medical marijuana and hope your headache goes away

?


Shoot everyone involved for being a farking retard.
 
Displayed 7 of 7 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report