If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Al Jazeera)   It turns out Japan is now getting around its constitutional ban on a navy by calling their new ship part of a "self-defense force with serving members." What could possibly go wrong?   (aljazeera.com) divider line 156
    More: Scary, Japan, Sea of Japan, particle displacement, flight suit, Shinzo Abe, Liberal Democratic Party, elephants, navies  
•       •       •

8055 clicks; posted to Main » on 14 Jun 2013 at 9:14 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



156 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2013-06-14 08:50:47 AM
Probably not much.  The nationalism that blinded them in the 1920's, 30's, and 40's doesn't seem to be too much in evidence now, and they'll make a nice naval counter-weight to China.

/I thought Japan already had a professional Navy.
 
2013-06-14 08:55:29 AM

dittybopper: /I thought Japan already had a professional Navy.


They do. Ours.

They've also got the SDF, which is just an ordinary military with a different name.
 
2013-06-14 09:08:30 AM
Why can't America have a Self-Defense Force of their own?
 
2013-06-14 09:10:33 AM
I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.
 
2013-06-14 09:16:37 AM
I just read that Chinese military scholars have decided they might actually own Okinawa, that might have something to do with it.
 
2013-06-14 09:16:48 AM
Maybe they are worried about the whale and dolphin force.
 
2013-06-14 09:17:03 AM

jaylectricity: Why can't America have a Self-Defense Force of their own?


Run by Homeland Security, maybe?
 
2013-06-14 09:17:06 AM

James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.


Yeah, anyone who is worried about this is probably a paranoid looney
 
2013-06-14 09:20:32 AM

jaylectricity: Why can't America have a Self-Defense Force of their own?


Second amendment solutions?
 
2013-06-14 09:21:26 AM
They have had a military for years. It does however, seem ineffective keeping out Godzilla.

img849.imageshack.us
 
2013-06-14 09:21:34 AM
They could contribute to regional stability since WWII ended like 70 years ago and everyone involved that the conflict is dead or almost dead?
 
2013-06-14 09:21:43 AM
"For a century and a half now, America and Japan have formed one of the great and enduring alliances of modern times. From that alliance has come an era of peace in the Pacific."

----- George W. Bush

/so I'm not worried about this.
 
2013-06-14 09:23:44 AM

James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.


istenbizony.hu

bbsimg.ngfiles.com

thedingleberry.files.wordpress.com

thechive.files.wordpress.com
 
2013-06-14 09:23:47 AM

dmars: James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.

Yeah, anyone who is worried about this is probably a paranoid looney


A disturbingly large chunk of the international community.
 
2013-06-14 09:23:51 AM
What could go wrong? For one thing they could spacefold inside the gravity well of Earth and end up transporting Macross City somewhere near the orbit of Pluto!

basementrejects.com
 
2013-06-14 09:24:40 AM

Abe Vigoda's Ghost: James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.

[istenbizony.hu image 600x452]

[bbsimg.ngfiles.com image 369x306]

[thedingleberry.files.wordpress.com image 600x824]

[thechive.files.wordpress.com image 500x375]


I said a military, not our collective sanity.
 
2013-06-14 09:25:40 AM
"with serving members"

High school girls in maid uniforms? /DNRTFA
 
2013-06-14 09:25:50 AM
Subby; you realize they've been doing this for...  What, 60 years?
 
2013-06-14 09:25:54 AM

doglover: dittybopper: /I thought Japan already had a professional Navy.

They do. Ours.

They've also got the SDF, which is just an ordinary military with a different name.


Um, the Japan Maritime SDF is considered one of the most powerful navies in the world, possibly second only to the USN, and has been for at least the last couple of decades.  They're one of the few countries that we sell the Aegis system to, which enables them to be a true blue-water navy.
 
2013-06-14 09:26:00 AM
I wonder what worst Korea thinks of this.  The only country that I can think of that would not like this move.
 
2013-06-14 09:28:23 AM

doglover: They do. Ours.

They've also got the SDF, which is just an ordinary military with a different name.


Japan's really one of the few countries capable of defending themselves without totally relying on us.  Their forces, particularly the air force (JASDF) and navy (JMSDF), are exceptionally well trained and equipped.  The only thing that's caused a little rattle amongst the tinfoil hat crowd is that now they've got a  couple of legitimate light aircraft carriers in the 20,000 ton range capable of operating (but not currently equipped with) VTOL aircraft like the Harrier or  F-35B.

Oh, and here's a hint for subby.  Japan's had a postwar navy since 1952.
 
2013-06-14 09:30:12 AM

doglover: They've also got the SDF, which is just an ordinary military with a different name.


encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com
I wouldn't go around calling that ordinary.

/Seriously, that is one impressively trolltastic attention-whore headline. No wonder the mods approved it. if you're an American, you probably shouldn't be worried about Japan's military-industrial complex running out of control and destroying their country. Hint: you might want to think a little closer to home.

// And you might want to adjust your world-view so WWII is not your reference point for all history. I know it's hard, Susan, but you can rub those two brain cells of yours together.
 
2013-06-14 09:30:43 AM
Please build the Yamato. I want to see a giant laser before I die.
 
2013-06-14 09:30:44 AM
Subby is scared.    Ooooooooo...  ships with guns.   Oh nooesss.
 
2013-06-14 09:30:45 AM
They are a stone's throw away from China and Best Korea, two countries that would like to remove Japan from the map.

There are a lot of Japanese who feel that the US can't/won't defend them if China or NK decide to invade.

I really don't blame them for wanting a stronger military.
 
2013-06-14 09:31:07 AM

Arkanaut: doglover: dittybopper: /I thought Japan already had a professional Navy.

They do. Ours.

They've also got the SDF, which is just an ordinary military with a different name.

Um, the Japan Maritime SDF is considered one of the most powerful navies in the world, possibly second only to the USN, and has been for at least the last couple of decades.  They're one of the few countries that we sell the Aegis system to, which enables them to be a true blue-water navy.


Don't you bring your filthy facts into this conversation.
 
2013-06-14 09:32:40 AM
uh... why do we have aljazeera links up on fark? is drew trying to get himself on a list?
 
2013-06-14 09:33:18 AM
Yes, yes, and the reunification of Germany was supposed to bring about the second-coming of Hitler, remember?
 
2013-06-14 09:33:38 AM
Geez subby, take a Xanax and change those Huggies. All the legitimate dangers in the world and you're worried about Japan?

Besides, they're going to unleash Godzilla on us when they seek their revenge.
 
2013-06-14 09:33:48 AM

Abe Vigoda's Ghost: James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.

[istenbizony.hu image 600x452]

[bbsimg.ngfiles.com image 369x306]

[thedingleberry.files.wordpress.com image 600x824]

[thechive.files.wordpress.com image 500x375]


Oh man, I want the tanuki suit for Hallowe'en.

Something tells me that the original version of Super Mario Bros. 3 may have undergone some revision before the American release.
 
2013-06-14 09:34:47 AM
www.thinkhero.comThey might have a ban on having a navy, but what about a SPACE NAVY!!!

Oh, and some of the shiat we put out for Coast Guard cutters would be able to match most navies around the world.
 
2013-06-14 09:35:29 AM
Everyone who signed that treaty is dead now.
Isn't that how it works?

Native.
 
2013-06-14 09:37:16 AM
Post more funny Japanese pictures
 
2013-06-14 09:41:17 AM

James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.


You'd think.  But you can bet the Chinese and the Koreans will speak out against this.

When it came to "grievous acts of violence during wartime" I'd say the Germans were on par with the Japanese, if not having surpassed them, but the Germans weren't required to give up their military.
 
2013-06-14 09:41:40 AM

Lundah: Yes, yes, and the reunification of Germany was supposed to bring about the second-coming of Hitler, remember?


Why would Germany need a 2nd Hitler when every country in Europe gave them control over their finances anyway?

"Give me control of a nations money and I care not who makes it's laws" - Mayer Rothschild
"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."
- Mayer Amschel Rothschild - See more at: http://the-classic-liberal.com/give-me-control-nations-money/#sthash. 1 qD80hZ7.dpuf "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."
- Mayer Amschel Rothschild - See more at: http://the-classic-liberal.com/give-me-control-nations-money/#sthash. 1 qD80hZ7.dpuf

"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."
- Mayer Amschel Rothschild - See more at: http://the-classic-liberal.com/give-me-control-nations-money/#sthash. 1 qD80hZ7.dpuf
 
2013-06-14 09:42:23 AM

Source4leko: Lundah: Yes, yes, and the reunification of Germany was supposed to bring about the second-coming of Hitler, remember?

Why would Germany need a 2nd Hitler when every country in Europe gave them control over their finances anyway?

"Give me control of a nations money and I care not who makes it's laws" - Mayer Rothschild
"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."
- Mayer Amschel Rothschild - See more at: http://the-classic-liberal.com/give-me-control-nations-money/#sthash. 1 qD80hZ7.dpuf "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."
- Mayer Amschel Rothschild - See more at: http://the-classic-liberal.com/give-me-control-nations-money/#sthash. 1 qD80hZ7.dpuf

"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."
- Mayer Amschel Rothschild - See more at: http://the-classic-liberal.com/give-me-control-nations-money/#sthash. 1 qD80hZ7.dpuf


Wow, quote fail there.  Sorry all.
 
2013-06-14 09:43:12 AM

gestug: Post more funny Japanese pictures


1.bp.blogspot.com cdn.themetapicture.com 4.bp.blogspot.com i3.ytimg.com yonasu.com
 
2013-06-14 09:43:31 AM

Saiga410: I wonder what worst Korea thinks of this.  The only country that I can think of that would not like this move.


Actually, since South Korea is closely allied with the United States (so is Japan, BTW), I suspect that they wouldn't have too much trouble with this.

China, on the other hand, might. It's likely that the expansion of the Japanese Navy would be the result of Beijing's attempt to bolster the Chinese Navy.
 
2013-06-14 09:46:17 AM

silverjets: James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.

You'd think.  But you can bet the Chinese and the Koreans will speak out against this.

When it came to "grievous acts of violence during wartime" I'd say the Germans were on par with the Japanese, if not having surpassed them, but the Germans weren't required to give up their military.


It wasn't ingrained into their constitution, but West Germany didn't have a military for 10 years after WWII.  (And even then, that was a military necessity to counter the Warsaw Pact.)  To their credit, they have also been far more open and contrite about their actions during WWII than Japan has.
 
2013-06-14 09:47:44 AM
Maybe if they just called their sailors "associates".
 
2013-06-14 09:49:55 AM

Arkanaut: They're one of the few countries that we sell the Aegis system to,


That's my point. We sell them all kinds of good shiat. And vice versa.
 
2013-06-14 09:50:49 AM

tzzhc4: What could go wrong? For one thing they could spacefold inside the gravity well of Earth and end up transporting Macross City somewhere near the orbit of Pluto!

[basementrejects.com image 300x227]


Came for the Robotech reference. Leaving happy.
 
2013-06-14 09:51:43 AM
jaylectricity

Why can't America have a Self-Defense Force of their own?


The United States will never have a unified force. The different branches of the armed forces are just too different from each other. For example, if you tell the Navy to secure a building, they'll shell it, send in the Marines to secure and then Sea Bees to rebuild. If you tell the Army to secure a building, they'll send in the Special Forces and then engineers to reinforce it and infantry to establish perimeter defenses.

But if you tell the Air Force to secure a building, they'll sign a 99 lease on it with an option after 75 years to buy.
 
2013-06-14 09:54:07 AM

doglover: Arkanaut: They're one of the few countries that we sell the Aegis system to,

That's my point. We sell them all kinds of good shiat. And vice versa.


Okay then.  I thought by "They do - ours" you meant that they rely on the USN to protect them, which hasn't been true for a while now.  I'm sure we still play a role in their defensive plans but they can definitely do a decent enough job on their own.
 
2013-06-14 09:54:45 AM

silverjets: James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.

You'd think.  But you can bet the Chinese and the Koreans will speak out against this.

When it came to "grievous acts of violence during wartime" I'd say the Germans were on par with the Japanese, if not having surpassed them, but the Germans weren't required to give up their military.


Sure, if by "weren't required to give up their military" you mean the Wermacht was disbanded by the Allied occupation forces. Both East and West Germany had no military until 1955, one year after the Japanese officially created the SDF.
 
2013-06-14 09:55:09 AM

Source4leko: Wow, quote fail there. Sorry all.


There was lots of fail in that post.
 
2013-06-14 09:56:10 AM

James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.


Just because it's paranoid to think that there are flying, invisible space monsters waiting to rip your face off; does not preclude the existence of flying, invisible space monsters waiting to rip your face off.
 
2013-06-14 09:57:03 AM

Satanic_Hamster: Subby; you realize they've been doing this for... What, 60 years?


Yeah, I was going to say; this is not new at all.

James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point. It's been 70 years.


At this point, it's not really "our" place to say. What keeps Japan from having a military is not a treaty, but its own constitution; we wrote it, back in the day, but it's theirs to amend. The topic comes up from time to time, but it always gets defeated.
 
2013-06-14 10:01:52 AM

Arkanaut: To their credit, they have also been far more open and contrite about their actions during WWII than Japan has.


Nonsense.  The entire court of Germany was on vacation during 1935-1945.  Ask Poland.  Punch was served.
 
2013-06-14 10:04:44 AM

wildcardjack: [www.thinkhero.com image 850x554]They might have a ban on having a navy, but what about a SPACE NAVY!!!


Sign me up!  My older brother is waiting for me!
 
2013-06-14 10:06:29 AM
zer0c0ntext.files.wordpress.com
funny-pictures-blog.com
xspblog.com
global3.memecdn.com
browntweedsociety.files.wordpress.com
funny-pictures-blog.com
global3.memecdn.com
 
2013-06-14 10:10:16 AM

James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.


agreed
 
2013-06-14 10:13:08 AM

Millennium: Satanic_Hamster: Subby; you realize they've been doing this for... What, 60 years?

Yeah, I was going to say; this is not new at all.

James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point. It's been 70 years.

At this point, it's not really "our" place to say. What keeps Japan from having a military is not a treaty, but its own constitution; we wrote it, back in the day, but it's theirs to amend. The topic comes up from time to time, but it always gets defeated.




As long as we can still blame all white people for slavery.
 
2013-06-14 10:13:47 AM

doglover: dittybopper: /I thought Japan already had a professional Navy.

They do. Ours.

They've also got the SDF, which is just an ordinary military with a different name.


but they're really set up to defend from giant ants more than anything.
www.oxmonline.com

Oh wait.. EDF  ? never mind.
 
2013-06-14 10:14:49 AM
Good, we may need the help, if nothing else they will make a good buffer vs chicoms
 
2013-06-14 10:16:07 AM
www.wtfcostumes.com

Their serving members will use their magnets to pull enemy ships into their fleet.
 
2013-06-14 10:17:02 AM

silverjets: James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.

You'd think.  But you can bet the Chinese and the Koreans will speak out against this.

When it came to "grievous acts of violence during wartime" I'd say the Germans were on par with the Japanese, if not having surpassed them, but the Germans weren't required to give up their military.


This might be the reason China could have an issue with it.
 
2013-06-14 10:18:50 AM

verbaltoxin: silverjets: James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.

You'd think.  But you can bet the Chinese and the Koreans will speak out against this.

When it came to "grievous acts of violence during wartime" I'd say the Germans were on par with the Japanese, if not having surpassed them, but the Germans weren't required to give up their military.

This might be the reason China could have an issue with it.


Fark chucked my link.

http://www.historyinanhour.com/2010/12/13/the-rape-of-nanking-a-summ ar y/
 
2013-06-14 10:19:18 AM
I'm more surprised an Al-Jazeera article was greenlit to be honest.
 
2013-06-14 10:19:38 AM
We've have land, air and sea military forces since the occupation ended, they're just called "self-defense forces". Japan has one of the world's biggest military budgets, and has for many years (currently #5 behind US, China, Russia and UK).

America has been pushing for Japan to revise the constitution and overturn article 9 (the 'no military beyond self-defense' bit) since the Korean War. Once they were certain Japan was firmly on their side, they wanted as many guns as possible pointed at the Commies. Some of the loudest biatching about it came during the first Gulf War: 'our boys are laying down their lives, why do the Japs (and the Krauts) think they can just get off with writing a check?" Uhh, because our constitution forbids us from doing any more. You wrote it, remember?

Did my eyes deceive me, or was China claiming to be concerned by our military aggression? What's the hanzi for 'chutzpah'?
 
2013-06-14 10:23:33 AM

qorkfiend: silverjets: James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.

You'd think.  But you can bet the Chinese and the Koreans will speak out against this.

When it came to "grievous acts of violence during wartime" I'd say the Germans were on par with the Japanese, if not having surpassed them, but the Germans weren't required to give up their military.

Sure, if by "weren't required to give up their military" you mean the Wermacht was disbanded by the Allied occupation forces. Both East and West Germany had no military until 1955, one year after the Japanese officially created the SDF.


The other thing to consider is that the regular German military forces fought a much "cleaner" war than the regular military forces of Imperial Japan.
 
2013-06-14 10:24:04 AM

Lundah: Yes, yes, and the reunification of Germany was supposed to bring about the second-coming of Hitler, remember?


You are confusing German reunification with Brazil.
 
2013-06-14 10:31:22 AM
Heh.

There is a pretty big movement in the Japanese Government right now to do away with the SDF and make the military a full fledged, well, military. The Defense Minster supports this and there's a good chance he will be the next PM. It's a move that's gaining some serious public traction with the NoRKs getting all squirrelly and China becoming a bigger player in the region.

There's a underlying current amongst the SDF and the Government that Japan needs a military in order to keep pace with China for influence in East Asia. The SDF is well trained and very well equipped. Serving in the SDF is no longer the stigma is once was either. If they wanted too, Japan could very easily have a nuclear armed force inside of five years.

The US is encouraging this as well because the SDF is one of the few forces in the world that meets or exceeds US standard.

One of my students was a contractor with the SDF for a long time; he has some really interesting stories. And yes, many of the top commanders are the sons of IJA and IJN Admirals and Generals, how did you know?

The real SDF would probably build a Mecha Godzilla to fight off real Godzilla. They're pretty badass, actually.
 
2013-06-14 10:34:22 AM

qorkfiend: silverjets: James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.

You'd think.  But you can bet the Chinese and the Koreans will speak out against this.

When it came to "grievous acts of violence during wartime" I'd say the Germans were on par with the Japanese, if not having surpassed them, but the Germans weren't required to give up their military.

Sure, if by "weren't required to give up their military" you mean the Wermacht was disbanded by the Allied occupation forces. Both East and West Germany had no military until 1955, one year after the Japanese officially created the SDF.


But did the US pound it into the German constitution that they were forbidden from having a military?  They did to the Japanese.   The SDF is a self defense force.  It would cause a constitutional crisis for Japan to use the SDF offensively.
 
2013-06-14 10:38:09 AM

gnosis301: Please build the Yamato. I want to see a giant laser before I die.


They already built the Yamato. You're referring to accessorizing the Yamato.
 
2013-06-14 10:46:18 AM

WelldeadLink: gnosis301: Please build the Yamato. I want to see a giant laser before I die.

They already built the Yamato. You're referring to accessorizing the Yamato.


I'd be more impressed if they raised and rebuilt into a space battleship the IJN Clamato.
 
2013-06-14 10:48:29 AM
Can they get around the constitutional ban on non-blurry porn?
 
2013-06-14 10:50:10 AM

verbaltoxin: verbaltoxin: silverjets: James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.

You'd think.  But you can bet the Chinese and the Koreans will speak out against this.

When it came to "grievous acts of violence during wartime" I'd say the Germans were on par with the Japanese, if not having surpassed them, but the Germans weren't required to give up their military.

This might be the reason China could have an issue with it.

Fark chucked my link.

http://www.historyinanhour.com/2010/12/13/the-rape-of-nanking-a-summ ar y/


China  killed more of their own people than Japan did, and at this moment is a much larger threat to regional security. Anti-Japanese sentiments at this point are just a political tool for the Chinese leadership to divert attention away from themselves.
 
2013-06-14 10:57:57 AM
Good. WWII is over. I'm tired of paying for Japan's national defense. Let their own tax payers keep them save from invasion. And let's get out of Germany and 20 other stable democracies while we're at it.
 
2013-06-14 11:00:01 AM

lostcat: I really don't blame them for wanting a stronger military.


dittybopper: and they'll make a nice naval counter-weight to China.



Looks like we're doing just fine in this thread.

Given the sheer number of regional conflicts in those seas, I can certainly understand why they'd want to have some muscle.
 
2013-06-14 11:03:49 AM

utah dude: uh... why do we have aljazeera links up on fark? is drew trying to get himself on a list?


It's al-Jazeera English, not the Al-Qaeda Book of the Month Club. Their news reporting is generally more trustworthy and "fair and balanced" than the MSM in the US.
 
2013-06-14 11:05:29 AM
Rather than "destroyer" designating it as something like a coast guard cutter with a flat top able to launch helicopters for search and rescue / contraband interdiction would seem to be more truthful? I imagine that's largely it's intended day to day use?
 
2013-06-14 11:06:38 AM

Mr. Cat Poop: Can they get around the constitutional ban on non-blurry porn?


The non-blurry stuff is available, but it is more expensive, so you really have to have a yen for it.
 
2013-06-14 11:09:28 AM
Maybe this time around Japan shouldn't paint targets on their ships:
www.combinedfleet.com
 
2013-06-14 11:10:41 AM
Well it's about time. I remember seeing a doc on the SDF and I was rather impressed by it. I never thought it was that big. I remember during the first Gulf war when Japan wanted to send minesweepers to the gulf to help clear the mines, but that caused a big debate. I think they did end up sending them though.
 
2013-06-14 11:10:47 AM
"Anywhere else, the Hyuga would be classed as a "light aircraft carrier", but because of sensitivities over the constitution, Japan's government has designated it a "destroyer".

Am I the only one who loves the crazy political hoops some countries have gone to in order to avoid calling a spade a spade?  I mean the Soviets had the Moskva class "ASW Cruisers" which were really chopper carriers, and then the Kiev class which I think were also called cruisers, despite having full flight decks for VSTOL aircraft.

Then of course, lets not even begin to look at the brazen lie that the RN pulled on it's own government to avoid the unpopular term aircraft carrier when they built the Invincible... "through deck cruiser"   riiiight.

Anyways, just rambling, don't mind me.
 
2013-06-14 11:17:31 AM
Call me when it transforms into a robot. Rick hunter will probably be the pilot.
 
2013-06-14 11:21:42 AM
20-year-old news is old.

I sailed with Japanese MSDF ships during exercises in the 90's, ffs.
 
2013-06-14 11:31:52 AM

DrunkWithImpotence: "Anywhere else, the Hyuga would be classed as a "light aircraft carrier", but because of sensitivities over the constitution, Japan's government has designated it a "destroyer".

Am I the only one who loves the crazy political hoops some countries have gone to in order to avoid calling a spade a spade?  I mean the Soviets had the Moskva class "ASW Cruisers" which were really chopper carriers, and then the Kiev class which I think were also called cruisers, despite having full flight decks for VSTOL aircraft.

Then of course, lets not even begin to look at the brazen lie that the RN pulled on it's own government to avoid the unpopular term aircraft carrier when they built the Invincible... "through deck cruiser"   riiiight.

Anyways, just rambling, don't mind me.


Before WW2 they broke the Washington Naval treaty a lot by fudging the numbers and jsut outright lying about they weights and types of ships they had http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Naval_Treaty
 
2013-06-14 11:33:36 AM
My penis is a secret weapon of love.


/idk all i got
 
2013-06-14 11:33:42 AM
img69.imageshack.us
Anywhere else, the Hyuga would be classed as a "light aircraft carrier",  but because of sensitivities over the constitution, Japan's government has designated it a "destroyer".
 
2013-06-14 11:36:55 AM
They'd better hurry up and bolster some defenses... we have a little under two years before this guy shows up...

www.teamartail.com
 
2013-06-14 11:45:45 AM

dittybopper: Probably not much.  The nationalism that blinded them in the 1920's, 30's, and 40's doesn't seem to be too much in evidence now...


www.iwadai.com

/New, not vintage.
//hot
 
2013-06-14 11:45:56 AM

silverjets: qorkfiend: silverjets: James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.

You'd think.  But you can bet the Chinese and the Koreans will speak out against this.

When it came to "grievous acts of violence during wartime" I'd say the Germans were on par with the Japanese, if not having surpassed them, but the Germans weren't required to give up their military.

Sure, if by "weren't required to give up their military" you mean the Wermacht was disbanded by the Allied occupation forces. Both East and West Germany had no military until 1955, one year after the Japanese officially created the SDF.

But did the US pound it into the German constitution that they were forbidden from having a military?  They did to the Japanese.   The SDF is a self defense force.  It would cause a constitutional crisis for Japan to use the SDF offensively.


Kind of, the German's crafted their own constitution that forbid a standing army.  I'm sure the us hint hint nudge nudged them, but we didn't outright write their constitution.
 
2013-06-14 11:54:33 AM
Is pleased:
3.bp.blogspot.com

/Better not be obscure.
//It is hot, though.
///Hot like oiled up gay Japanese nationalists.....
 
2013-06-14 11:56:36 AM
As a Chinese, I won't feel OK with until Japan at least formally recognize the war crimes they commited during the WWII. I'm sure most Japanese people are fine, but the number of right wing nutsy in Japan politics is alarming. One recent example being comfort women being a "necessity" in war time. I also understand that most Japanese don't know of things that Japan did during WWII because it's not taught in school or things are heavily prettied over. It's really hard to trust them when many of the ones in power still deny the existence/scale of the Nanking Massacre or comfort women.

Sure China has its issues as well, but that's a separate topic.
 
2013-06-14 12:00:51 PM

woodstock827: As a Chinese, I won't feel OK with until Japan at least formally recognize the war crimes they commited during the WWII. I'm sure most Japanese people are fine, but the number of right wing nutsy in Japan politics is alarming. One recent example being comfort women being a "necessity" in war time. I also understand that most Japanese don't know of things that Japan did during WWII because it's not taught in school or things are heavily prettied over. It's really hard to trust them when many of the ones in power still deny the existence/scale of the Nanking Massacre or comfort women.

Sure China has its issues as well, but that's a separate topic.


Don't hold your breath, Japan doesn't even discuss their involvement in WWII with their own people.
 
2013-06-14 12:14:12 PM

dmars: James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.

Yeah, anyone who is worried about this is probably a paranoid looney


So I see you've never been to Japan.  Horribly racist, nationalist, farked up superiority complex still exists and going strong.  They'd rather just euthanize any half breed children that slip by but we are watching.
 
2013-06-14 12:16:44 PM

utah dude: uh... why do we have aljazeera links up on fark? is drew trying to get himself on a list?


Because it's a better news agency than CNN, MSNBC, and Faux News combined?  That's my guess.
 
2013-06-14 12:23:35 PM

woodstock827: As a Chinese, I won't feel OK with until Japan at least formally recognize the war crimes they commited during the WWII. I'm sure most Japanese people are fine, but the number of right wing nutsy in Japan politics is alarming. One recent example being comfort women being a "necessity" in war time. I also understand that most Japanese don't know of things that Japan did during WWII because it's not taught in school or things are heavily prettied over. It's really hard to trust them when many of the ones in power still deny the existence/scale of the Nanking Massacre or comfort women.

Sure China has its issues as well, but that's a separate topic.


Japan has recognized the war crimes and has apologized multiple times. Sure, once in a while an old geezer in government says something stupid again. Just like there are still some hardcore communists left in the government in China.

But as an Asian you should be able to recognize that the reasons that Japan doesn't admit their mistakes with more effort is exactly the reason why people in China ignore the fact that their grandparents where red guards and murderers.  This is because they share the same cultural background, confucianism, guilt vs. shame etc.

The simple fact is that China wouldn't be where it is today without the billions of aid that Japan paid in reparations. All of the infrastructure that was built in the 80's and early 90's that enabled China to escape from economic obscurity where built with Japanese money.
 
2013-06-14 12:26:18 PM
 Why don't they just change their constitution? What the hell right do we have to tell them after 70 years that they cannot have a military. At this point it's just going to mean WE will have to fight their wars. It's a stupid bureaucratic hold over which has outlived the people who drafted it as well as it's usefulness.
 
2013-06-14 12:28:29 PM
Nothing could go wrong. Japan's military needs to step up its game to counter China because we may not be there to help, same with Taiwan, the Philippines, Singapore, Australia. etc.
 
2013-06-14 12:32:20 PM
We should sell them our carriers for there seamen.
 
2013-06-14 12:33:25 PM

thehobbes: I'm more surprised an Al-Jazeera article was greenlit to be honest.


What? Why?
 
2013-06-14 12:46:40 PM

red5ish: Anywhere else, the Hyuga would be classed as a "light aircraft carrier",  but because of sensitivities over the constitution, Japan's government has designated it a "destroyer".


Another Japanese Destroyer:

www.kaijukits.com

They have an amazing gift for clincally accurate understatement.
 
2013-06-14 12:49:12 PM

HypnozombieX: Why don't they just change their constitution? What the hell right do we have to tell them after 70 years that they cannot have a military. At this point it's just going to mean WE will have to fight their wars. It's a stupid bureaucratic hold over which has outlived the people who drafted it as well as it's usefulness.


Like I said, the topic comes up from time to time in the Japanese legislature. The Japanese Constitution is actually easier to amend than the US Constitution -you need a 2/3 majority in both houses, then a simple majority in a referendum-, but the proposals to do so never seem to get enough votes.

In other words, what right do we have to tell them after 70 years? None whatsoever. But at this point, we're not telling them; they're telling them.
 
2013-06-14 12:49:16 PM

ModernLuddite: Is pleased:
[3.bp.blogspot.com image 400x277]

/Better not be obscure.



"Life is coincidence ruined by sanity."
 
2013-06-14 12:52:09 PM
Congratulations Al-Jazeera, you overreacted to an amphibious assault ship. Calling this gross violation of article 9 is like saying that NZ is warmongering with its air force (only offensive craft are prop driven ASW craft).

If you are talking like the want an air craft carrier fleet ala WWII, I think you are overstating the issue, this isn't the Akagi here. You could put the Harrier, but it is now decades old and frankly sucks with how inefficient its' jump-jet systems are, or better modern planes like the Marine varient of the f-35 if it ever gets completed and delivered.
 
2013-06-14 12:54:36 PM

doglover: dittybopper: /I thought Japan already had a professional Navy.

They do. Ours.

They've also got the SDF, which is just an ordinary military with a different name.


Super Defense Fortress?? Japan has the Macross?
 
2013-06-14 01:04:02 PM
I think it might be time to let them have an offensive military.
 
2013-06-14 01:11:00 PM

HypnozombieX: Why don't they just change their constitution? [...] At this point it's just going to mean WE will have to fight their wars.


The second sentence answers the first.
 
2013-06-14 01:13:24 PM
Time to remove that constitutional restriction.  The U.S. Navy way overmatches every other navy in the world, possibly combined.  The region needs a counterbalance to China anyway.
 
2013-06-14 01:19:30 PM
Clandestine military buildup?

They took a lesson from you-know-who.

i.imgur.com
 
2013-06-14 01:30:28 PM
Oooooooooo~~~~, those Scary Japs!
 
2013-06-14 01:32:06 PM
Has anybody mentioned yet that Japan has had a military for decades and that they get around the ban by calling it a "Self-Defence Force?"
 
2013-06-14 01:38:31 PM
I think, perhaps, America should rescind that new Constitution. Frankly, that's Draconian.
 
2013-06-14 01:40:34 PM
I don't think it is time to amend their constitution. I think they need to disband their SDF and have thought this for quite some time. If another country wants to go terrorize Japan, rape their citizens, kill them, etc? They should have as easy a time as possible doing so. I will consider changing my mind when they stop worshiping war criminals. That may not be enough for me to change my mind though. Oh, and Okinawa? That belongs to us. We earned it.
 
2013-06-14 01:41:59 PM

King Something: Has anybody mentioned yet that Japan has had a military for decades and that they get around the ban by calling it a "Self-Defence Force?"


I think everyone knows that. Well, anyone who is commenting should know that. They can even amend their constitution to allow for a straight up military.
 
2013-06-14 01:56:06 PM

silverjets: James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.

You'd think.  But you can bet the Chinese and the Koreans will speak out against this.

When it came to "grievous acts of violence during wartime" I'd say the Germans were on par with the Japanese, if not having surpassed them, but the Germans weren't required to give up their military.


probably the same reason why German Americans  weren't rounded up and put in camps.
 
2013-06-14 02:04:07 PM
Twenty minutes out into the open waters of the Sea of Japan, and our destination came  into view. The Hyuga, the flagship naval vessel of the SDF, is the length of two football fields. With a water displacement of 13950 tons, it is a massive ship. Its flat-top deck can operate 11 helicopters, and we are told, could, if necessary, carry certain kinds of fighter jets.

LOL.. good thing he didn't fly by the IHI marine united yokohama shipyard currently building the 22DDH..

nextnavy.com

Bigger one above is the new 22DDH class

Below is Hyuga Class from the article
 
2013-06-14 02:14:28 PM

HotWingConspiracy: I just read that Chinese military scholars have decided they might actually own Okinawa, that might have something to do with it.


Being called "Chinese" is probably the only thing Okinawans would like even less than being called "Japanese."
 
2013-06-14 02:22:29 PM

dbirchall: HotWingConspiracy: I just read that Chinese military scholars have decided they might actually own Okinawa, that might have something to do with it.

Being called "Chinese" is probably the only thing Okinawans would like even less than being called "Japanese."


I'll admit my travels in Pacific/Asia have been limited (Philippines, Thailand, Korea, Okinawa, etc) but if there's any one group they can agree on hating, it's the Chinese. Well, maybe the Russians, who were referred to as "Americans without money."
 
2013-06-14 02:30:22 PM
i have absolutely zero issue with the japanese rearming at this poitn. they've shown they're a  responsible democracy with good institutions.

they've had their nationalistic wings clipped and arent goign to be using their military in foolish imperialistic ventures around the world and as DB said in OP the world could use a counterweight to china in the region that isnt the US.

indeed wtf are we even still doing in that part of the world? meh. yankee go home.
 
2013-06-14 02:30:28 PM

wildcardjack: [www.thinkhero.com image 850x554]They might have a ban on having a navy, but what about a SPACE NAVY!!!

Oh, and some of the shiat we put out for Coast Guard cutters would be able to match most navies around the world.


We're done.
 
2013-06-14 02:31:41 PM
It's all fun and games until the Germans bomb Pearl Harbor again.
 
2013-06-14 02:46:58 PM
A rose by any other name....

The Japanese have a navy.  They just call it the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force.
 
2013-06-14 02:54:24 PM

James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.


Sure, but it'll be a cold day in hell before I trust the German navy.

/12/7/41 - never forget
 
2013-06-14 02:58:28 PM
I remember once reading a story of an American pilot who, during one of the carrier battles during World War II, got was confused and tried to land on a Japanese carrier.  He realized his mistake at the last minute and basically ended up buzzing the flight deck.  Wish I could remember more details about this story.
 
2013-06-14 02:59:42 PM
www.examiner.com

Come at me bro.
 
2013-06-14 03:05:50 PM

Mock26: I remember once reading a story of an American pilot who, during one of the carrier battles during World War II, got was confused and tried to land on a Japanese carrier.  He realized his mistake at the last minute and basically ended up buzzing the flight deck.  Wish I could remember more details about this story.


Read about a British pilot who's fighter was shot up over France and couldn't make it back.  Searching around, the only place he could find to land was a German air field so he said "fark it" and landed.  Then asked for tea.
 
2013-06-14 03:55:07 PM

utah dude: uh... why do we have aljazeera links up on fark? is drew trying to get himself on a list?


That's a mighty ignorant post, right there...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Jazeera
 
2013-06-14 03:57:52 PM

Millennium: Satanic_Hamster: Subby; you realize they've been doing this for... What, 60 years?

Yeah, I was going to say; this is not new at all.

James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point. It's been 70 years.

At this point, it's not really "our" place to say. What keeps Japan from having a military is not a treaty, but its own constitution; we wrote it, back in the day, but it's theirs to amend. The topic comes up from time to time, but it always gets defeated.


This.
 
2013-06-14 04:04:21 PM

phalaeo: utah dude: uh... why do we have aljazeera links up on fark? is drew trying to get himself on a list?

That's a mighty ignorant post, right there...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Jazeera


Al_Jezza:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Clarkson
 
2013-06-14 04:20:01 PM

FatPrincess: "with serving members"

High school girls in maid uniforms? /DNRTFA


We can only wish...

/My bunk, you can find me there...
//After which I understand I've got a bus to catch to hell.  One of the seats has my name engraved on it...
 
2013-06-14 04:39:40 PM

silverjets: James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.

You'd think.  But you can bet the Chinese and the Koreans will speak out against this.

When it came to "grievous acts of violence during wartime" I'd say the Germans were on par with the Japanese, if not having surpassed them, but the Germans weren't required to give up their military.


Um, hate to break it to you, but Germany's military was disassembled.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aftermath_of_World_War_II#Germany

We didn't just go for demilitarization - we went after De-Industrialization.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JCS_1067#JCS_1067

Only after 1947 when we started worrying that there might be a popular communist revolt did we let up and start rebuilding instead of destroying.  It wasn't until 1955, after the BRD was allowed to be a country again, and they joined NATO, did they rearm.
 
2013-06-14 04:42:04 PM

stevarooni: jaylectricity: Why can't America have a Self-Defense Force of their own?

Run by Homeland Security, maybe?


and backed by the national guard?
 
2013-06-14 04:43:37 PM

silverjets: qorkfiend: silverjets: James!: I think we can trust the Japanese with a military at this point.  It's been 70 years.

You'd think.  But you can bet the Chinese and the Koreans will speak out against this.

When it came to "grievous acts of violence during wartime" I'd say the Germans were on par with the Japanese, if not having surpassed them, but the Germans weren't required to give up their military.

Sure, if by "weren't required to give up their military" you mean the Wermacht was disbanded by the Allied occupation forces. Both East and West Germany had no military until 1955, one year after the Japanese officially created the SDF.

But did the US pound it into the German constitution that they were forbidden from having a military?  They did to the Japanese.   The SDF is a self defense force.  It would cause a constitutional crisis for Japan to use the SDF offensively.


They weren't allowed to be a country again until we needed them to be a country to resist Soviet maneuvers.  We treated Germany much harsher than the Japanese in our post war administration.  I think Germany would have much preferred being handed a constitution rather than be administered by:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JCS_1067#JCS_1067
 
2013-06-14 04:55:44 PM
www.warstore.co.uk


/ i can borrowz comfort women?
 
2013-06-14 05:12:35 PM

jaylectricity: Why can't America have a Self-Defense Force of their own?


We do, but we tend to use more Westernized terminology to describe them, plus we don't have as many Constitutional hoops to jump through.

No a bunch of hicks with a small armory of semi-legal guns is not a "self-defense force" or "militia".
 
2013-06-14 05:15:45 PM
It's a fact that Japan hasn't really owed up to its past like Germany has.  Japanese ignorance about the events of WWII are sort of appalling.  And yeah, there are some genuine victims who are still alive such as the so-called comfort women and those who worked as slave labor.

The problem is apart from the victims who should collect some financial compensation for their injuries, governments who are really pressing the issue are only doing so because they have some political bone to pick with Japan - like over disputed territories, fishing rights, etc.  In particular China and North Korea.

Also, that was 70 years ago and as others noted, Japan is a mature and stable democracy.  The US doesn't want to pay to patrol the waters of East Asia forever.  And plenty of East Asian countries aren't particurly happy at the thought of the Chinese taking over the role of the big dog on the block.
 
2013-06-14 05:26:25 PM

bikkurikun: woodstock827: As a Chinese, I won't feel OK with until Japan at least formally recognize the war crimes they commited during the WWII. I'm sure most Japanese people are fine, but the number of right wing nutsy in Japan politics is alarming. One recent example being comfort women being a "necessity" in war time. I also understand that most Japanese don't know of things that Japan did during WWII because it's not taught in school or things are heavily prettied over. It's really hard to trust them when many of the ones in power still deny the existence/scale of the Nanking Massacre or comfort women.

Sure China has its issues as well, but that's a separate topic.

 Sure, once in a while an old geezer in government says something stupid again. Just like there are still some hardcore communists left in the government in China.


Old geezer? How about the frikkin' mayor of Osaka?

Link

graphics8.nytimes.com
 
2013-06-14 05:54:45 PM

groppet: Before WW2 they broke the Washington Naval treaty a lot by fudging the numbers and jsut outright lying about they weights and types of ships they had http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Naval_Treaty


Before WWII EVERYBODY broke the Washington Naval treaty by fudging the numbers or outright lying about their ships.

skullkrusher: I think it might be time to let them have an offensive military.


They have one now.  Their defense forces are easily capable of offensive operations on land, at sea, and in the air.
 
2013-06-14 06:28:00 PM

Harry Freakstorm: But if you tell the Air Force to secure a building, they'll sign a 99 lease on it with an option after 75 years to buy.


Only if the building has a gym and hot tubs.  Otherwise they aerial bomb the shiat out of it.

/And probably target the wrong building
 
2013-06-14 06:30:47 PM

bikkurikun: woodstock827: As a Chinese, I won't feel OK with until Japan at least formally recognize the war crimes they commited during the WWII. I'm sure most Japanese people are fine, but the number of right wing nutsy in Japan politics is alarming. One recent example being comfort women being a "necessity" in war time. I also understand that most Japanese don't know of things that Japan did during WWII because it's not taught in school or things are heavily prettied over. It's really hard to trust them when many of the ones in power still deny the existence/scale of the Nanking Massacre or comfort women.

Sure China has its issues as well, but that's a separate topic.

Japan has recognized the war crimes and has apologized multiple times. Sure, once in a while an old geezer in government says something stupid again. Just like there are still some hardcore communists left in the government in China.

But as an Asian you should be able to recognize that the reasons that Japan doesn't admit their mistakes with more effort is exactly the reason why people in China ignore the fact that their grandparents where red guards and murderers.  This is because they share the same cultural background, confucianism, guilt vs. shame etc.

The simple fact is that China wouldn't be where it is today without the billions of aid that Japan paid in reparations. All of the infrastructure that was built in the 80's and early 90's that enabled China to escape from economic obscurity where built with Japanese money.


They've been whitewashing what they did in WW2 in their new schoolbooks.  This is not a good sign.
 
2013-06-14 06:43:45 PM
OgreMagi:

They've been whitewashing what they did in WW2 in their new schoolbooks.  This is not a good sign.

Source?
 
2013-06-14 06:48:23 PM
silverjets
But did the US pound it into the German constitution that they were forbidden from having a military? They did to the Japanese. The SDF is a self defense force. It would cause a constitutional crisis for Japan to use the SDF offensively.


Same is actually true for Germany.

I've seen people complain in threads about Germany not pulling its weight in e.g. Afghanistan or Yugoslavia and leaving all the dangerous jobs to the US and others.
They're usually ignorant of the fact that, according to the German constitution, German troops aren't even supposed to be there at all because the German military is supposed to be purely a defensive force.

It was quite a crisis and a political and constitutional shiatstorm and took lots of rhetorical, mental and moral gymnastics to get involved there at all. So politicians were arguing that they're either "defending Germany at the Hindukush" (the minster of defense at the time) because of Taliban-supported terrorism or that the German troops are only there to do jobs that can be argued to be of a humanitarian nature (rebuilding crap, training police, keeping the peace).
Even having a couple of Tornados there to provide camera footage caused quite a debate if not a scandal and, IIRC, was then stopped.

Shiat, during Iraq 2003 you had leftist pacifists doing sit-down protest trying to block access to US bases in Germany, because by letting the US use its bases in Germany to supply the invasion of Iraq, Germany was indirectly and unconstitutionally aiding someone who started an illegal war of aggression. For the same reason some legal folks made the entertaining thought experiment that, if it weren't for protocol and diplomatic immunity and it simply being unimaginable and shiat, that yes, they would actually be required to arrest president Bush during his state visit to Germany for ordering the invasion or on suspicion of being a war criminal or something along those lines.
So for every fart a German soldier does, there's probably been a battle between politicians not wanting Germany to lose face internationally and letting allies down versus public opinion being very, very anti-war and the constitution.
 
2013-06-14 06:54:09 PM

bakarocket: OgreMagi:

They've been whitewashing what they did in WW2 in their new schoolbooks.  This is not a good sign.

Source?


http://lmgtfy.com/?q=japan+whitewashing+history+in+textbooks
 
2013-06-14 07:00:17 PM
Yeah, they totally need a new generation of ships that don't have so much wood on them:

th01.deviantart.net
 
2013-06-14 07:02:33 PM

OgreMagi: bakarocket: OgreMagi:

They've been whitewashing what they did in WW2 in their new schoolbooks.  This is not a good sign.

Source?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=japan+whitewashing+history+in+textbooks


So, old articles referring to books published and not actually used in any schools, angry internet pundits, and Wikipedia.

So...no source, then, huh?
 
2013-06-14 07:38:51 PM
Turn 'em loose. They can be on our side this time :-)
 
2013-06-14 08:13:00 PM

dittybopper: Probably not much.  The nationalism that blinded them in the 1920's, 30's, and 40's doesn't seem to be too much in evidence now, and they'll make a nice naval counter-weight to China.

/I thought Japan already had a professional Navy.


Yes, a very substantial one
 
2013-06-14 08:20:20 PM

bakarocket: OgreMagi: bakarocket: OgreMagi:

They've been whitewashing what they did in WW2 in their new schoolbooks.  This is not a good sign.

Source?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=japan+whitewashing+history+in+textbooks

So, old articles referring to books published and not actually used in any schools, angry internet pundits, and Wikipedia.

So...no source, then, huh?


Man, he would make a really, really great lawyer.

OgreMagi:  Your honor.  The defendant is guilty of murder.
Judge:  Where is your evidence?
OgreMagi:  Go look it up yourself!
 
2013-06-14 08:32:49 PM
This is a good thing on a number of levels..  A representative government calls the shots now, not an emperor, so we don't have to worry about them trying to go out and dominate the world. And considering how China is starting shiat with them over those fishing islands....a stronger military gives them more influence in regional affairs.  This takes pressure off the U.S. military, which has been the police in the region since WWII.  Not to mention the Japanese are getting sick of U.S. bases in their country.  A military of their own reduces the need for us to be there.
 
2013-06-14 08:37:32 PM
1) Doesn't Starfleet do the same thing?

2) Strike Witches haven't been posted yet?
 
2013-06-14 08:48:55 PM

gestug: Post more funny Japanese pictures


3.bp.blogspot.com
www.cavemancircus.com
 
2013-06-14 08:54:02 PM
www.filgifts.com
 
2013-06-14 09:03:05 PM

Mock26: bakarocket: OgreMagi: bakarocket: OgreMagi:

They've been whitewashing what they did in WW2 in their new schoolbooks.  This is not a good sign.

Source?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=japan+whitewashing+history+in+textbooks

So, old articles referring to books published and not actually used in any schools, angry internet pundits, and Wikipedia.

So...no source, then, huh?

Man, he would make a really, really great lawyer.

OgreMagi:  Your honor.  The defendant is guilty of murder.
Judge:  Where is your evidence?
OgreMagi:  Go look it up yourself!


Yeah. People do talk about it a lot, but then never mention that the textbooks are used by maybe ten schools in the entire country. It's a function of the textbook system. As long as books follow the bare minimums, they can be used, but since school boards are responsible for choosing the books, just because one is published doesn't mean it is used.

Also, while Japanese history texts definitely skip over a lot of detail, there's no whitewashing involved. They are required by law to mention Nanjing and other bad stuff, but just like in North America, the grisly details are left for university level classes.

An entire generation of Germans was emotionally brutalized for the sins of their fathers. I'm personally glad it hasn't happened in Japan, but unfortunately they've gone the other direction by not describing enough.

They're doesn't need to be German-level guilt-laying, but there should definitely more than US-level "it wasn't us, so we don't need to talk about it."

My kids will get a balanced education on this.
 
2013-06-14 09:06:40 PM
bakarocket:

Also, while Japanese history texts definitely skip over a lot of detail, there's no whitewashing involved.

Edit: "there's no whitewashing of the textbooks most commonly used in junior high schools and high schools. They're just data-deficient.

Anyway, do you really think 15 year old kids should be learning about torture, rape and mass murder? I personally don't, and apparently school boards in the US are of the same mind if their record on teaching about the atrocities commited during the Vietnam war are anything to go by.
 
2013-06-14 10:41:10 PM

WordsnCollision: dittybopper: Probably not much.  The nationalism that blinded them in the 1920's, 30's, and 40's doesn't seem to be too much in evidence now...

[www.iwadai.com image 421x463]

/New, not vintage.
//hot


Not sure what point you're trying to make.  It's a Cupie Doll, of which there are literally thousands of collectible varieties in all sorts of costumes, and that one is only one of the many in a limited SDF series (most of which are in modern SDF uniforms).

It clearly says "Costume Cupie, Kyuugun Collection".  Kyuugun (旧軍) is short for Kyuu Nihon-gun (OLD Japanese Armed Forces).  Saying the existence of a period-costume doll is evidence of hyper-nationalism is dumb.

OgreMagi: bakarocket: OgreMagi:

They've been whitewashing what they did in WW2 in their new schoolbooks.  This is not a good sign.

Source?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=japan+whitewashing+history+in+textbooks


Good old pot, keep calling that kettle black.  America needs to stop concern trolling other countries' issues and remove that log from their own eye.  Then your opinion might count for something.

/NM, go right back to providing guns and bomb to terrorists
//And supporting murderous despots
///And then accidentally forgetting to teach your kids about it
 
2013-06-14 10:49:31 PM

gnosis301: Please build the Yamato. I want to see a giant laser before I die.


THIS so much.
 
2013-06-15 12:25:16 AM
aagrajag:

Something tells me that the original version of Super Mario Bros. 3 may have undergone some revision before the American release.

It wasn't his tail that he would swing around to hit turtles, I'll tell you that much.

/i did it all for Tanooki
 
2013-06-15 02:01:34 AM

Farxist Marxist: Maybe if they just called their sailors "associates".


Cast members.

i.imgur.com
 
2013-06-15 11:16:41 AM

WordsnCollision: dittybopper: Probably not much.  The nationalism that blinded them in the 1920's, 30's, and 40's doesn't seem to be too much in evidence now...

[www.iwadai.com image 421x463]

/New, not vintage.
//hot


It is a Self-Defense Forces limited kewpie strap which is sold at a shop in the Kanoya air force base in Kagoshima prefecture. It says "Japan win all battles. Hi-no-maru vigorous young men are strongest. I'm a Zero fighter plane pilot. There is no one anywhere who is a match for Japanese spirit." on the package. It give a dangerous smell a little. But its design is so cool to be loved by men. The elaborate workmanship kewpie strap looks funny.
 
2013-06-15 11:29:35 AM

Pumpernickel bread: This is a good thing on a number of levels..  A representative government calls the shots now, not an emperor, so we don't have to worry about them trying to go out and dominate the world. And considering how China is starting shiat with them over those fishing islands....a stronger military gives them more influence in regional affairs.  This takes pressure off the U.S. military, which has been the police in the region since WWII.  Not to mention the Japanese are getting sick of U.S. bases in their country.  A military of their own reduces the need for us to be there.


Hate to break it to you, but the Emperor wasn't the source of the problem.
 
2013-06-15 02:00:13 PM
I think they just want an excuse to build Gundam-style war robots.
 
2013-06-15 08:49:37 PM
I keep saying it's not their Navy we have to worry about, it's their Air Force...
www.animeinblu.com
 
Displayed 156 of 156 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report