If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The New York Times)   For a religion that holds elimination of desire as one of its core teachings, these Buddhist monks seem to be really feisty about who owns some priceless relics   (nytimes.com) divider line 88
    More: Interesting, Buddhists, Buddhist monks, Japan Ground Self-Defense Force, teachings, faiths  
•       •       •

4924 clicks; posted to Main » on 03 Jun 2013 at 12:39 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



88 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2013-06-03 06:07:59 AM  
"To stop suffering, stop greediness.  Greediness is a source of suffering," said the Buddha.

The "deity of compassion" is  Avalokiteśvara, the most revered of the Bodhisattvas, known  to the Chinese in the feminine form of Quan Yin.  They are not gods but beings far advanced on the path to Enlightenment, who could enter the eternal non-suffering of Nrivana if they chose.  They choose, instead, to remain in this realm of birth, suffering, death, and rebirth until they have helped every other sentient being achieve Nirvana... a never-ending task.

Their love is infinitely greater than the love which Jesus said was the greatest.  To die for one's friends is the work of a moment; to live and suffer eternally for them is a far greater sacrifice.
 
2013-06-03 06:26:52 AM  
Also Buddhism plays the LOOOOOONG game. You think one eternity is a long time? The Bodhisattva are willing to deal with multiples of that to save every sentient creature. It's not a short path, so it's understandable that not everyone will be advanced far enough to avoid such banal conflicts as this, especially considering you're not really a full Buddhist unless you're meditating and such, actively working on your own enlightenment. If you just go to the temples on New Year's Day and funerals, you're just a fan of the religion.

And that's really how many Asians describe themselves. The Japanese have no religion, if you ask them. Shinto is a thing, Buddhism is a thing, but most of the time they're secular. Koreans are probably similar. They eat meat, drink beer, and don't sit around and meditate all day. No monks, just familiar with Buddhism. So it's understandable they wouldn't be very far along the path.
 
2013-06-03 09:21:58 AM  
TFA:


"The pageant's organizers say they took the drastic step of canceling this year's celebration out of their own growing frustration over what they call South Korea's unwillingness to let bygones be bygones. Acutely conscious of Japan's declining position in the region, they say the Japanese are losing patience with being demonized for crimes committed decades or even centuries ago."


I think this kind of attitude exemplifies part of the reason why Japan's neighbors are still quite annoyed with them.
 
2013-06-03 11:56:25 AM  
Japan and Korea??

I detect the corrupting influence of Shinto and Christianity.

*begins backing away*

...also, the entire Mahayana branch is too moony to worry overmuch about the Buddha's teachings

*runs*
 
2013-06-03 12:28:42 PM  
Yeah the idea that Buddhism have based on television show and a few Western idiots who don't really know anything about it is far from what Buddhism really is.

For example, who here knew that Buddhism was routinely used in the past to justify wars and violence?

i.imgur.com

Four days ago, in Myanmar there was a report that a Muslim man had burned a Buddhist woman. Buddhist mobs started riots and have been attacking Muslims since, forcing them into hiding.
 
2013-06-03 12:35:14 PM  

Tatsuma: Yeah the idea that Buddhism have based on television show and a few Western idiots who don't really know anything about it is far from what Buddhism really is.


Yeah, because Buddhism is one thing.

For example, who here knew that Buddhism was routinely used in the past to justify wars and violence?

I knew.  And plenty of other people.  You're not special.

Four days ago, in Myanmar there was a report that a Muslim man had burned a Buddhist woman. Buddhist mobs started riots and have been attacking Muslims since, forcing them into hiding.

Yes, violence in Myanmar - often directed by monks - is not new.  What's your point?
 
2013-06-03 12:38:11 PM  

Lionel Mandrake: Yes, violence in Myanmar - often directed by monks - is not new. What's your point?


"Don't pay attention to the crap in the Middle East - look at those Buddhists instead!"
 
2013-06-03 12:40:54 PM  
2.bp.blogspot.com

unlikely Buddhists
 
2013-06-03 12:42:14 PM  

Lionel Mandrake: Yes, violence in Myanmar - often directed by monks - is not new. What's your point?


presumably that subby's surprise doesn't make much sense in light of reality.
 
2013-06-03 12:42:17 PM  

Lionel Mandrake: Tatsuma: Yeah the idea that Buddhism have based on television show and a few Western idiots who don't really know anything about it is far from what Buddhism really is.

Yeah, because Buddhism is one thing.

For example, who here knew that Buddhism was routinely used in the past to justify wars and violence?

I knew.  And plenty of other people.  You're not special.

Four days ago, in Myanmar there was a report that a Muslim man had burned a Buddhist woman. Buddhist mobs started riots and have been attacking Muslims since, forcing them into hiding.

Yes, violence in Myanmar - often directed by monks - is not new.<b>  What's your point?

</b>

Just wait for it......it will come into the thread eventually.
 
2013-06-03 12:42:37 PM  
The purpose of discipline is to live MORE fully, not less.
I don't want to learn how to "not want." That's what people in prison have to deal with.
 
2013-06-03 12:45:32 PM  
I have no problem with the Buddhists.  Their thing is pretty interesting.  Most of it seems to be based on sound logic.  Religion in general though, is not my bag, man.
 
2013-06-03 12:45:55 PM  

Lionel Mandrake: Yes, violence in Myanmar - often directed by monks - is not new. What's your point?


I just want to note that in Myanmar, especially the rural areas where there is very few resources and few prospects of employment, it's fairly customary for the young men to become "monks" for a while because the Buddhist temples have work and food. They're monks in name only and they're not generally there for spiritual reasons.

So, the monks that often instigate riots and violence are often just unemployed young men with too much time on their hands looking for somebody to blame. The fact that they are monks is just a very minor detail since they're not really doing it as a directive of the religion.
 
2013-06-03 12:46:09 PM  
I think the Bible says the same thing, but its followers are less likely to abandoned such sinful desires.
 
2013-06-03 12:46:54 PM  
And didn't Jesus say: "drop all your material shiat and hang out with me, it'll be cool".
 
2013-06-03 12:47:28 PM  

Tatsuma: Yeah the idea that Buddhism have based on television show and a few Western idiots who don't really know anything about it is far from what Buddhism really is.

For example, who here knew that Buddhism was routinely used in the past to justify wars and violence?

i.imgur.com

Four days ago, in Myanmar there was a report that a Muslim man had burned a Buddhist woman. Buddhist mobs started riots and have been attacking Muslims since, forcing them into hiding.


Are you suggesting Buddhism really is those examples?

Anything can be twisted, and often is, to serve military and political purposes. Except Judaism, of course.
 
2013-06-03 12:47:55 PM  

skullkrusher: presumably that subby's surprise doesn't make much sense in light of reality.


Nailed it.
 
2013-06-03 12:48:32 PM  

BarkingUnicorn: "To stop suffering, stop greediness.  Greediness is a source of suffering," said the Buddha.

The "deity of compassion" is  Avalokiteśvara, the most revered of the Bodhisattvas, known  to the Chinese in the feminine form of Quan Yin.  They are not gods but beings far advanced on the path to Enlightenment, who could enter the eternal non-suffering of Nrivana if they chose.  They choose, instead, to remain in this realm of birth, suffering, death, and rebirth until they have helped every other sentient being achieve Nirvana... a never-ending task.

Their love is infinitely greater than the love which Jesus said was the greatest.  To die for one's friends is the work of a moment; to live and suffer eternally for them is a far greater sacrifice.


Strictly speaking, Jesus said "you shall love your neighbor as yourself". Also, "love you enemies". In fact, he even went so far as to say that 'love' was 'the whole of the Law fulfilled in one word'.

So far as I can tell, love could entail either dying for someone OR living and suffering for them. It's situationally dependent.

/ I can't believe I just defended Christianity in a Fark thread
 
2013-06-03 12:49:42 PM  

J. Frank Parnell: Anything can be twisted, and often is, to serve military and political purposes. Except Judaism, of course.


Aw shiat, here we go...
 
2013-06-03 12:49:55 PM  

J. Frank Parnell: Are you suggesting Buddhism really is those examples?


No I'm not, I'm deriding this attitude of 'Buddhists sit around wanting nothing, fat and jolly like those buddha statues!' that so many here have. How many times do you read shiat like 'Oh I'm not interested in Xianity or Islam but if I had to be religious, I'd choose something like Buddhism!' just because they buy into that image?

J. Frank Parnell: Anything can be twisted, and often is, to serve military and political purposes. Except Judaism, of course.


Not only can (and has) Judaism be distorted and twisted into something it's not, it led to two movements responsible for most of the misery felt on earth (until the 20th century at least) for the last 2,000 years.
 
2013-06-03 12:50:26 PM  

Tatsuma: Yeah the idea that Buddhism have based on television show and a few Western idiots who don't really know anything about it is far from what Buddhism really is.

For example, who here knew that Buddhism was routinely used in the past to justify wars and violence?

[i.imgur.com image 256x380]

Four days ago, in Myanmar there was a report that a Muslim man had burned a Buddhist woman. Buddhist mobs started riots and have been attacking Muslims since, forcing them into hiding.


Yes, it turns out people world-wide will use their faith to justify their own actions, regardless of how much their actions are in line with the professed faith's core beliefs.  It's almost like it has more to do with the kind of person they are and nothing to do with the kind of religion they advocate.  Weird, huh?
 
2013-06-03 12:51:29 PM  

Jake Havechek: And didn't Jesus say: "drop all your material shiat and hang out with me, it'll be cool".


What's Jesus have to do with a bunch of Buddhists fighting over relics?

netgamer7k: I think the Bible says the same thing, but its followers are less likely to abandoned such sinful desires.


Why are you bringing up Christianity when the article has fark all to do with them?
 
2013-06-03 12:51:40 PM  
"Are you still carrying that woman? I put her down back at the river".
 
2013-06-03 12:51:41 PM  

whistleridge: Strictly speaking, Jesus said "you shall love your neighbor as yourself". Also, "love you enemies".


Except that he was just quoting Vayikra/Leviticus. Not an original teaching.

whistleridge: In fact, he even went so far as to say that 'love' was 'the whole of the Law fulfilled in one word'.


And he cribbed that from Hillel, too.
 
2013-06-03 12:51:53 PM  
"It's a Buddhist meditation technique, focuses your aggression. The monks used to do it before they went into battle."

"What sort of Buddhism is this, Otto?"
 
2013-06-03 12:51:54 PM  

Tatsuma: Not only can (and has) Judaism be distorted and twisted into something it's not, it led to two movements responsible for most of the misery felt on earth (until the 20th century at least) for the last 2,000 years.


By which, I assume you are referring to Christianity and Islam?

Because if that's so, then by that logic, Judaism is nothing more than a warped sectarian offshoot of ancient zoroastrianism, and we should really be blaming the ancient Persians...:p
 
2013-06-03 12:52:42 PM  

Tatsuma: whistleridge: Strictly speaking, Jesus said "you shall love your neighbor as yourself". Also, "love you enemies".

Except that he was just quoting Vayikra/Leviticus. Not an original teaching.

whistleridge: In fact, he even went so far as to say that 'love' was 'the whole of the Law fulfilled in one word'.

And he cribbed that from Hillel, too.


Yes, he did. Point in fact, both he and Saul/Paul barely said a single original thing. Which was kind of their point...
 
2013-06-03 12:52:51 PM  

whistleridge: By which, I assume you are referring to Christianity and Islam?

Because if that's so, then by that logic, Judaism is nothing more than a warped sectarian offshoot of ancient zoroastrianism, and we should really be blaming the ancient Persians...:p


Judaism is older than zoroastrianism. Also both Xianity and Islam themselves declare they are offshoots from us.
 
2013-06-03 12:52:56 PM  

RexTalionis: "The pageant's organizers say they took the drastic step of canceling this year's celebration out of their own growing frustration over what they call South Korea's unwillingness to let bygones be bygones. Acutely conscious of Japan's declining position in the region, they say the Japanese are losing patience with being demonized for crimes committed decades or even centuries ago."

I think this kind of attitude exemplifies part of the reason why Japan's neighbors are still quite annoyed with them.


You mean the neighbors' stubborn insistence on teaching about the Rape of Nanking in history class, thus demonizing those poor, oppressed Japanese?
 
2013-06-03 12:53:21 PM  
Hey look, a religion where the followers struggle to overcome their human weaknesses!

Never seen that before.
 
2013-06-03 12:53:40 PM  
Way to ruin an amusing headline by being so pendantic.
 
2013-06-03 12:54:52 PM  

RexTalionis: Lionel Mandrake: Yes, violence in Myanmar - often directed by monks - is not new. What's your point?

I just want to note that in Myanmar, especially the rural areas where there is very few resources and few prospects of employment, it's fairly customary for the young men to become "monks" for a while because the Buddhist temples have work and food. They're monks in name only and they're not generally there for spiritual reasons.

So, the monks that often instigate riots and violence are often just unemployed young men with too much time on their hands looking for somebody to blame. The fact that they are monks is just a very minor detail since they're not really doing it as a directive of the religion.


Good point, worth noting.

I didn't want to get into a "Real" Buddhism vs. "That" Buddhism rut.

All religious traditions have been used as vehicles for good and evil, and always will be.
 
2013-06-03 12:55:06 PM  

mekki: Jake Havechek: And didn't Jesus say: "drop all your material shiat and hang out with me, it'll be cool".

What's Jesus have to do with a bunch of Buddhists fighting over relics?


Maybe because it touches on Idolatry and the same message of forsaking material possessions in order to gain enlightenment inherent to most religions?

Want me to make you a flow chart? A motherfarking Powerpoint presentation complete with a video and summary handout?
 
2013-06-03 12:55:49 PM  

whistleridge: Yes, he did. Point in fact, both he and Saul/Paul barely said a single original thing. Which was kind of their point...


Yeah the few things they did say that were original were so far from Judaism that it ended up with Jews just rejecting it (but man did the non-Jewish pagans around love it).

Actually they already had a huge base to sell it to. They were the so-called 'G-d Fearers' of the Roman Empire. They were non-Jews who were really into Judaism. You had whole roman cities where you couldn't see a single fire during the Shabbat, etc... They basically would have converted to Judaism if it hadn't been for one pesky detail: They really hated circumcision and saw it as a complete monstrosity that shouldn't be emulated. They also loved their swine.

So when that guy (Paul) came and said 'Hey you can have all of these things you're looking for in Judaism but without removing your foreskin oh and still eat bacon' they went crazy for it.
 
2013-06-03 12:56:49 PM  

Jake Havechek: mekki: Jake Havechek: And didn't Jesus say: "drop all your material shiat and hang out with me, it'll be cool".

What's Jesus have to do with a bunch of Buddhists fighting over relics?

Maybe because it touches on Idolatry and the same message of forsaking material possessions in order to gain enlightenment inherent to most religions?

Want me to make you a flow chart? A motherfarking Powerpoint presentation complete with a video and summary handout?


Calm down. You're getting upset over nothing.
 
2013-06-03 12:57:56 PM  

Jake Havechek: mekki: Jake Havechek: And didn't Jesus say: "drop all your material shiat and hang out with me, it'll be cool".

What's Jesus have to do with a bunch of Buddhists fighting over relics?

Maybe because it touches on Idolatry and the same message of forsaking material possessions in order to gain enlightenment inherent to most religions?

Want me to make you a flow chart? A motherfarking Powerpoint presentation complete with a video and summary handout?


So any chance to bash Christianity even though it has nothing to do with the story. Got it.
 
2013-06-03 12:58:52 PM  

mekki: Jake Havechek: mekki: Jake Havechek: And didn't Jesus say: "drop all your material shiat and hang out with me, it'll be cool".

What's Jesus have to do with a bunch of Buddhists fighting over relics?

Maybe because it touches on Idolatry and the same message of forsaking material possessions in order to gain enlightenment inherent to most religions?

Want me to make you a flow chart? A motherfarking Powerpoint presentation complete with a video and summary handout?

So any chance to bash Christianity even though it has nothing to do with the story. Got it.


You didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition, did you!?
 
2013-06-03 01:00:08 PM  

whistleridge: BarkingUnicorn: "To stop suffering, stop greediness.  Greediness is a source of suffering," said the Buddha.

The "deity of compassion" is  Avalokiteśvara, the most revered of the Bodhisattvas, known  to the Chinese in the feminine form of Quan Yin.  They are not gods but beings far advanced on the path to Enlightenment, who could enter the eternal non-suffering of Nrivana if they chose.  They choose, instead, to remain in this realm of birth, suffering, death, and rebirth until they have helped every other sentient being achieve Nirvana... a never-ending task.

Their love is infinitely greater than the love which Jesus said was the greatest.  To die for one's friends is the work of a moment; to live and suffer eternally for them is a far greater sacrifice.

Strictly speaking, Jesus said "you shall love your neighbor as yourself". Also, "love you enemies". In fact, he even went so far as to say that 'love' was 'the whole of the Law fulfilled in one word'.

So far as I can tell, love could entail either dying for someone OR living and suffering for them. It's situationally dependent.

/ I can't believe I just defended Christianity in a Fark thread


I was referring to John 15:12-13

12"This is My commandment, that you love one another, just as I have loved you.13"Greater love has no one than this, that one lay down his life for his friends.
 
2013-06-03 01:00:27 PM  

Tatsuma: whistleridge: By which, I assume you are referring to Christianity and Islam?

Because if that's so, then by that logic, Judaism is nothing more than a warped sectarian offshoot of ancient zoroastrianism, and we should really be blaming the ancient Persians...:p

Judaism is older than zoroastrianism. Also both Xianity and Islam themselves declare they are offshoots from us.


Yes and no. There are arguments on both sides. Certainly, the Genesis story and much of the Torah probably stem from (slightly) older material, but vast chunks of the material were at a minimum heavily influenced. Angels are probably zoroastrian in origin, as is much of the underlying philosophy. At a minimum, modern Judaism has heavily syncretized many elements from the ancient Zian practices.

אִיוֹב /lyob/Job and  קֹהֶלֶת /Qoheleth /Ecclesiastes are both essentially products of this. Although I will admit some scholars argue for a more Hellenistic origin for the latter, and I'm showing my bias in saying that.
 
2013-06-03 01:01:09 PM  

chrylis: RexTalionis: "The pageant's organizers say they took the drastic step of canceling this year's celebration out of their own growing frustration over what they call South Korea's unwillingness to let bygones be bygones. Acutely conscious of Japan's declining position in the region, they say the Japanese are losing patience with being demonized for crimes committed decades or even centuries ago."

I think this kind of attitude exemplifies part of the reason why Japan's neighbors are still quite annoyed with them.

You mean the neighbors' stubborn insistence on teaching about the Rape of Nanking in history class, thus demonizing those poor, oppressed Japanese?


Nan King was asking for it.  I mean, look at what she was wearing.  Nan was practically begging for it.
 
2013-06-03 01:01:41 PM  
"Teachings" are also anti-buddhist.  But I don't think most buddhists would pick up on that.  *shrug* their path is not my path.

I prefer tao.  Don't seek to escape the patterns of life.  Instead, see life for the wonderful experience it is.  We are all one, jump on it.
 
2013-06-03 01:01:55 PM  

doglover: Also Buddhism plays the LOOOOOONG game. You think one eternity is a long time? The Bodhisattva are willing to deal with multiples of that to save every sentient creature.


Not for Theravadas. Once they attain enlightenment, they're outa here. The rest of y'all can figure it our for yourselves. It's the Republicanism of Buddhism.
 
2013-06-03 01:02:25 PM  
I worship the taco.

Either kind.
 
2013-06-03 01:02:36 PM  

whistleridge: Tatsuma: whistleridge: By which, I assume you are referring to Christianity and Islam?

Because if that's so, then by that logic, Judaism is nothing more than a warped sectarian offshoot of ancient zoroastrianism, and we should really be blaming the ancient Persians...:p

Judaism is older than zoroastrianism. Also both Xianity and Islam themselves declare they are offshoots from us.

Yes and no. There are arguments on both sides. Certainly, the Genesis story and much of the Torah probably stem from (slightly) older material, but vast chunks of the material were at a minimum heavily influenced. Angels are probably zoroastrian in origin, as is much of the underlying philosophy. At a minimum, modern Judaism has heavily syncretized many elements from the ancient Zian practices.

אִיוֹב /lyob/Job and  קֹהֶלֶת /Qoheleth /Ecclesiastes are both essentially products of this. Although I will admit some scholars argue for a more Hellenistic origin for the latter, and I'm showing my bias in saying that.


Don't forget that large portions of the Torah were edited after the fact to remove references to various other contemporary and older Semitic gods like Asherah and Baal when the sect that became Judaism broke away to become monotheists.
 
2013-06-03 01:02:44 PM  

BarkingUnicorn: I was referring to John 15:12-13

12"This is My commandment, that you love one another, just as I have loved you.13"Greater love has no one than this, that one lay down his life for his friends.


I knew what you were referring to. But the implication in the Greek is more to give everything you have (your life) than just to die. That's why it doesn't say 'to die'. To lay down your life could just as easily be understood to give it up, ie to hand over your control of it, in the sense that you will suffer or sacrifice for all your days. It does not have to mean simple death.
 
2013-06-03 01:02:51 PM  

NutWrench: The purpose of discipline is to live MORE fully, not less.
I don't want to learn how to "not want." That's what people in prison have to deal with.


Westerner. (spits on the ground at your feet).
 
2013-06-03 01:03:10 PM  

Honest Bender: "Teachings" are also anti-buddhist.  But I don't think most buddhists would pick up on that.  *shrug* their path is not my path.

I prefer tao.  Don't seek to escape the patterns of life.  Instead, see life for the wonderful experience it is.  We are all one, jump on it.


3.bp.blogspot.com
 
2013-06-03 01:05:15 PM  

Honest Bender: "Teachings" are also anti-buddhist. But I don't think most buddhists would pick up on that. *shrug* their path is not my path.


Genuine Buddhists have transcended labels.
 
2013-06-03 01:05:35 PM  
Every religion humanity has ever devised eventually is misused or misunderstood and put to evil purposes.

Dosn't make the ideas less valid, just makes the followers human.

/Except for the God(s) thing, which is just primitive mythology that we can't seem to let go of.
//Buddhist.
 
2013-06-03 01:05:35 PM  

whistleridge: BarkingUnicorn: "To stop suffering, stop greediness.  Greediness is a source of suffering," said the Buddha.

The "deity of compassion" is  Avalokiteśvara, the most revered of the Bodhisattvas, known  to the Chinese in the feminine form of Quan Yin.  They are not gods but beings far advanced on the path to Enlightenment, who could enter the eternal non-suffering of Nrivana if they chose.  They choose, instead, to remain in this realm of birth, suffering, death, and rebirth until they have helped every other sentient being achieve Nirvana... a never-ending task.

Their love is infinitely greater than the love which Jesus said was the greatest.  To die for one's friends is the work of a moment; to live and suffer eternally for them is a far greater sacrifice.

Strictly speaking, Jesus said "you shall love your neighbor as yourself". Also, "love you enemies". In fact, he even went so far as to say that 'love' was 'the whole of the Law fulfilled in one word'.

So far as I can tell, love could entail either dying for someone OR living and suffering for them. It's situationally dependent.

/ I can't believe I just defended Christianity in a Fark thread


The problem with modern Christianity is that so few people practice it.

/Fred Rogers is the notable exception.
 
2013-06-03 01:05:57 PM  

whistleridge: Yes and no. There are arguments on both sides. Certainly, the Genesis story and much of the Torah probably stem from (slightly) older material, but vast chunks of the material were at a minimum heavily influenced. Angels are probably zoroastrian in origin, as is much of the underlying philosophy. At a minimum, modern Judaism has heavily syncretized many elements from the ancient Zian practices.

אִיוֹב /lyob/Job and קֹהֶלֶת /Qoheleth /Ecclesiastes are both essentially products of this. Although I will admit some scholars argue for a more Hellenistic origin for the latter, and I'm showing my bias in saying that.


Again, Judaism predates Zoroastrianism. Zoroaster only came on the scene 6th Century BCE. We'd been in the land and had a Temple standing for centuries before he was even born. As much as people want to pretend that Bereshiat was cribbed from elsewhere, there is no actual proofs of that, nor any texts that even get close. Both Yiov and Kohelet are also older than Zoroastrianism.
 
2013-06-03 01:07:00 PM  

worlddan: Honest Bender: "Teachings" are also anti-buddhist. But I don't think most buddhists would pick up on that. *shrug* their path is not my path.

Genuine Buddhists have transcended labels.


They shop at Ross?
 
2013-06-03 01:07:13 PM  
There is such a thing as practical Buddhism.  It's a conscious effort to separate the teachings from the religion that's grown up around them. When the strictures of religion and veneration become more important than the actual living of a Buddhist life, it's time to discard the trappings.

I can believe in the alleviation of suffering, and the desire to bring compassion to my patch of ground and those living in it, without having to memorize dharma lineage or what someone wrote to their followers four hundred years ago.  It's possible to be a good, ethical man without having to involve organized faith in it.

As far as the conflict described in TFA, all I can offer is that not everyone can live up to an ideal every day.  There isn't a religion extant whose followers are 100% true to their teachings.  It's easy to be at peace when life is good, it's when you encounter hell that you display your character  It's up to everyone around them to remind them of their community and their principles.  That's true everywhere, not just there.
 
2013-06-03 01:08:28 PM  

lohphat: worlddan: Honest Bender: "Teachings" are also anti-buddhist. But I don't think most buddhists would pick up on that. *shrug* their path is not my path.

Genuine Buddhists have transcended labels.

They shop at Ross?


They certainly dress for less, if those robes are any indication.
 
2013-06-03 01:08:34 PM  

Tatsuma: No I'm not, I'm deriding this attitude of 'Buddhists sit around wanting nothing, fat and jolly like those buddha statues!' that so many here have. How many times do you read shiat like 'Oh I'm not interested in Xianity or Islam but if I had to be religious, I'd choose something like Buddhism!' just because they buy into that image?


There is a difference, but not quite like that. The word Buddhist is a western creation. In the east they're simply called beggars, and not treated with much respect.

People in the west have an idea of buddhist monks acting like christian monks, or them as revered holy masters, when the reality is much more humble.

And i'll spare everyone the old debate about it being a religion or spirituality.
 
2013-06-03 01:08:43 PM  
Sorta like why you never talk about the history of the Emerald Buddha in the Golden Triangle countries. 600 years and some people are *still* pissed.

Tatsuma:

Four days ago, in Myanmar there was a report that a Muslim man had burned a Buddhist woman. Buddhist mobs started riots and have been attacking Muslims since, forcing them into hiding.

Which is kind of like saying that a riot in Rome involved Catholic mobs, or one in Tel Aviv involved Jewish mobs. *Everyone* in Myanmar is expected to spend some time as a novice and / or monk or nun, especially the poor.
 
2013-06-03 01:10:15 PM  

Tatsuma: whistleridge: Yes, he did. Point in fact, both he and Saul/Paul barely said a single original thing. Which was kind of their point...

Yeah the few things they did say that were original were so far from Judaism that it ended up with Jews just rejecting it (but man did the non-Jewish pagans around love it).

Actually they already had a huge base to sell it to. They were the so-called 'G-d Fearers' of the Roman Empire. They were non-Jews who were really into Judaism. You had whole roman cities where you couldn't see a single fire during the Shabbat, etc... They basically would have converted to Judaism if it hadn't been for one pesky detail: They really hated circumcision and saw it as a complete monstrosity that shouldn't be emulated. They also loved their swine.

So when that guy (Paul) came and said 'Hey you can have all of these things you're looking for in Judaism but without removing your foreskin oh and still eat bacon' they went crazy for it.


Again, yes and no. Remember, it was Peter who originally said you can eat bacon, not Paul. And that wasn't the sticking point for the citizens of the broader Hellenistic and Roman world. It was circumcision. And for the more intellectual classes (ie, those who had studied in the philosophical schools), it was the inconsistencies of Judaic law. Christianity solved both at a swoop. That's why Paul's arguments about the fulfillment of the law and justification by faith rather than by rigid adherence to an outdated and inconsistent code gained such ground. It combined the moral authority inherent to Y_ _ _! with the philosophical understandings of Hellenism and the salvation of the various cult religions (Mithraism, etc).

In fact, it's entirely fair to say that Christianity is just as much a blend of Judaism and Hellenistic religions as Judaism is a blend of Zoroastrianism, minor dabs of Egyptian and Phoenician religions, and original content. Both are 100% historically accurate, if entirely off-point to their respective believers.

And just to be fair, in that viewpoint, Islam is a blatant rip-off of Christianity and Judaisms' greatest hits, plus a healthy dab of Arabic polytheistic traditions on top.
 
2013-06-03 01:10:27 PM  
"If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him." Linji Zen koan
 
2013-06-03 01:13:55 PM  

BitwiseShift: "If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him." Linji Zen koan


Why? When two thieves meet on the road they require no introduction, they know one another instantly.
 
2013-06-03 01:13:59 PM  

Jake Havechek: mekki: Jake Havechek: mekki: Jake Havechek: And didn't Jesus say: "drop all your material shiat and hang out with me, it'll be cool".

What's Jesus have to do with a bunch of Buddhists fighting over relics?

Maybe because it touches on Idolatry and the same message of forsaking material possessions in order to gain enlightenment inherent to most religions?

Want me to make you a flow chart? A motherfarking Powerpoint presentation complete with a video and summary handout?

So any chance to bash Christianity even though it has nothing to do with the story. Got it.

You didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition, did you!?


No one expects the Spanish Inquisition.
 
2013-06-03 01:15:39 PM  

RexTalionis: I just want to note that in Myanmar, especially the rural areas where there is very few resources and few prospects of employment, it's fairly customary for the young men to become "monks" for a while because the Buddhist temples have work and food. They're monks in name only and they're not generally there for spiritual reasons.


Good point.  Also, and not just in rural areas, they often do a short stint as a child, again as a teenager, and as an old man.  Some do it as a rite of passage or to get their head on straight trying to defeat alcohol or drugs.
 
2013-06-03 01:16:07 PM  

BitwiseShift: "If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him." Linji Zen koan


I followed that one.  Turns out the authorities frown on such actions. I was given quite some time to sit alone and contemplate my actions, though, so I guess that worked out.
 
2013-06-03 01:16:31 PM  

whistleridge: Again, yes and no. Remember, it was Peter who originally said you can eat bacon, not Paul. And that wasn't the sticking point for the citizens of the broader Hellenistic and Roman world. It was circumcision. And for the more intellectual classes (ie, those who had studied in the philosophical schools), it was the inconsistencies of Judaic law. Christianity solved both at a swoop. That's why Paul's arguments about the fulfillment of the law and justification by faith rather than by rigid adherence to an outdated and inconsistent code gained such ground. It combined the moral authority inherent to Y_ _ _! with the philosophical understandings of Hellenism and the salvation of the various cult religions (Mithraism, etc).


Of course, the bacon comment (while something that Paul did say) was more of a cheeky comment about how so many people on Fark say things like 'Judaism seems cool but I could never live without bacon!' and stuff like that.

I am not sure what you mean about the 'inconsistencies of Judaic law', because that's something I study full-time and I can't imagine what you are referring to. In fact if there's one religion filled with inconsistencies it's Xianity due to the fact that they claim origin from us yet reject Jewish law. You have the Bible saying clearly in Devarim/Deuteronomy that a man can divorce his wife, then Xianity turns around saying you can't. Pork is forbidden, Xianity turns around and says you can, etc...

whistleridge: In fact, it's entirely fair to say that Christianity is just as much a blend of Judaism and Hellenistic religions as Judaism is a blend of Zoroastrianism, minor dabs of Egyptian and Phoenician religions, and original content. Both are 100% historically accurate, if entirely off-point to their respective believers.


Judaism had long been established and its texts written before zoroaster was even born.

I don't know why you're just ignoring that and keep on repeating it as if you were somehow right.
 
2013-06-03 01:19:11 PM  
"If you meet the Buddha, kill him."- Linji
 
2013-06-03 01:22:29 PM  

Tatsuma: whistleridge: Yes and no. There are arguments on both sides. Certainly, the Genesis story and much of the Torah probably stem from (slightly) older material, but vast chunks of the material were at a minimum heavily influenced. Angels are probably zoroastrian in origin, as is much of the underlying philosophy. At a minimum, modern Judaism has heavily syncretized many elements from the ancient Zian practices.

אִיוֹב /lyob/Job and קֹהֶלֶת /Qoheleth /Ecclesiastes are both essentially products of this. Although I will admit some scholars argue for a more Hellenistic origin for the latter, and I'm showing my bias in saying that.

Again, Judaism predates Zoroastrianism. Zoroaster only came on the scene 6th Century BCE. We'd been in the land and had a Temple standing for centuries before he was even born. As much as people want to pretend that Bereshiat was cribbed from elsewhere, there is no actual proofs of that, nor any texts that even get close. Both Yiov and Kohelet are also older than Zoroastrianism.


Again: parts of it do. But by your own accounting, that Temple was smashed 3 separate times, its priests were slain, and its holy texts were utterly destroyed. It is literally a miracle of the faith that they were reassembled at all.

I'm being friendly by saying that. A harder line would point out that the oldest texts of Judaism are the Masoretic scrolls, which date from the 800s. Yes, they've been corroborated by the Dead Sea Scrolls and various bits of papyrus and various translations like the Septuagint, but my point remains: the faith is textually based, and those texts...actually aren't that old. Even if you assume the tradition is 100% accurate, the oldest possible record dates AFTER the Babylonian exile and the reestablishment of the Temple.

I'll be generous, and allow that the reestablishment was accurate, and that your older dates apply. We'll say Judaism exists as a religion since the time Abraham left Ur, sometime before 1000 BCE. I'll leave aside the massive dating issues even among Judaic scholars. Zoroaster is generally held to have lived approximately the same time, in the first half of the second millenium BCE. No, the religion established in his name didn't come along until the 6th century BCE, but....neither did Judaism in the sense that any modern person might mean it.

In short, I'm being generous but very accurate when I say Judaism is, at best, slightly older. 

/ yes, I realize the Orthodox Jewish version must necessarily see Judaism as much older, since it starts with Adam. That's a different argument, for a different site.
 
2013-06-03 01:24:42 PM  

Jake Havechek: I worship the taco.

Either kind.



Nacho Cheese and Cool Ranch?
 
2013-06-03 01:25:20 PM  

BitwiseShift: "If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him." Linji Zen koan

Thanks for playing. I run the local Buddhist funeral home down by the highway and business has been a little slow lately.
 
2013-06-03 01:26:24 PM  

Tatsuma: Judaism had long been established and its texts written before zoroaster was even born.

I don't know why you're just ignoring that and keep on repeating it as if you were somehow right.


I'm ignoring it, because while I have things like textual analysis and archaeology to support MY argument, your argument hinges entirely on a necessarily biased series of internal traditions and nothing more.

And hey, that's your right. In fact, it probably makes you a better believer. I don't fault you for that. If anything, I respect your strident defense of your beliefs.

But you can't honestly expect to walk into a nicely secular site like Fark and expect people to concede to that kind of argument. You and I have both been on here for years and years. I know I'm not going to change your mind, and I'm not trying to. But you shouldn't confuse 'shutting up because I got tired of pointing out the screamingly obvious' with 'winning'.
 
2013-06-03 01:26:48 PM  

dryknife: Jake Havechek: I worship the taco.

Either kind.


Nacho Cheese and Cool Ranch?


Of course!
 
2013-06-03 01:28:48 PM  

Jake Havechek: dryknife: Jake Havechek: I worship the taco.

Either kind.


Nacho Cheese and Cool Ranch?

Of course!


Polytheistic heresy!!1!  DIE HEATHEN!!
 
2013-06-03 01:28:57 PM  
"It berongs in a museum!"
 
2013-06-03 01:34:25 PM  

Xenomech: "It berongs in a museum!"


Au contraire. He needs to get out and see stuff. He and the gnome have seen 12 countries in the last month. Who do you think is holding the camera, all bronzed and relaxed?

encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com
 
2013-06-03 01:37:47 PM  
In Ann Arbor, the local Buddhist temple racketeer advertises explicitly: "Free yourself from materialism," etc.  Print ads, banners, signs, flyers, fridge magnets, you name it.

The chief "monk" was a regular at the swanky restaurant where I worked, and *always* ordered at least one $200-500 bottle of wine for every 2 people at the table.  He always paid with his temple's credit card.
 
2013-06-03 01:52:10 PM  

Tatsuma: whistleridge: By which, I assume you are referring to Christianity and Islam?

Because if that's so, then by that logic, Judaism is nothing more than a warped sectarian offshoot of ancient zoroastrianism, and we should really be blaming the ancient Persians...:p

Judaism is older than zoroastrianism. Also both Xianity and Islam themselves declare they are offshoots from us.


So you subscribe to an older breed of bullshiat? I'm impressed.
 
2013-06-03 01:52:30 PM  
"On one windswept beach, local residents say they have gathered annually for most of the last seven centuries to commemorate a battle in which a small band of samurai was wiped out trying to stop a Mongol-led invasion fleet from Korea that was bound for Japan proper. The invaders, many of them Korean soldiers, rounded up local women by stringing ropes through holes sliced into their palms, local historians say."


Okay then. I guess Game of Thrones last night wasn't all that bad!
 
2013-06-03 02:33:08 PM  
Didn't they invent the art of kicking the shiat out of people for stealing their wealth?
 
2013-06-03 02:46:36 PM  

whistleridge: Tatsuma: whistleridge: Yes and no. There are arguments on both sides. Certainly, the Genesis story and much of the Torah probably stem from (slightly) older material, but vast chunks of the material were at a minimum heavily influenced. Angels are probably zoroastrian in origin, as is much of the underlying philosophy. At a minimum, modern Judaism has heavily syncretized many elements from the ancient Zian practices.

אִיוֹב /lyob/Job and קֹהֶלֶת /Qoheleth /Ecclesiastes are both essentially products of this. Although I will admit some scholars argue for a more Hellenistic origin for the latter, and I'm showing my bias in saying that.

Again, Judaism predates Zoroastrianism. Zoroaster only came on the scene 6th Century BCE. We'd been in the land and had a Temple standing for centuries before he was even born. As much as people want to pretend that Bereshiat was cribbed from elsewhere, there is no actual proofs of that, nor any texts that even get close. Both Yiov and Kohelet are also older than Zoroastrianism.

Again: parts of it do. But by your own accounting, that Temple was smashed 3 separate times, its priests were slain, and its holy texts were utterly destroyed. It is literally a miracle of the faith that they were reassembled at all.

I'm being friendly by saying that. A harder line would point out that the oldest texts of Judaism are the Masoretic scrolls, which date from the 800s. Yes, they've been corroborated by the Dead Sea Scrolls and various bits of papyrus and various translations like the Septuagint, but my point remains: the faith is textually based, and those texts...actually aren't that old. Even if you assume the tradition is 100% accurate, the oldest possible record dates AFTER the Babylonian exile and the reestablishment of the Temple.

I'll be generous, and allow that the reestablishment was accurate, and that your older dates apply. We'll say Judaism exists as a religion since the time Abraham left Ur, sometime before 1000 BCE. I'll leave asid ...


He loves to brag. That's all. It's not about facts, so much as it is to brag.

/Never mind that there are older religious traditions out there, like, say, ancestor veneration from China, that's been around since the Neolithic period in China.
 
2013-06-03 02:52:01 PM  
The point of Buddhism is not to get rid of desire. The point is to get rid of attachment. Desire is actually helpful; you wouldn't want to study Buddhism without desire. That's why we're in the desire realm in the 3 realms model.
 
2013-06-03 02:57:08 PM  

Uncle Pim: The point of Buddhism is not to get rid of desire. The point is to get rid of attachment. Desire is actually helpful; you wouldn't want to study Buddhism without desire. That's why we're in the desire realm in the 3 realms model.


well, desire for Nirvana is ironically an impediment to achieving it. The desire to cease desiring is the most noble of desires but it is still a desire that eventually must fade to achieve enlightenment. That or looping for the Dalai Lama
 
2013-06-03 03:04:40 PM  
This 400 year old feud thing seems pretty silly to me, more of an interesting historical fact than something to get worked up about. Then again I am from the USA and our entire history as a country can be encapsulated by about 300 years (A little over 400 if we want to go back to Columbus). Just something of an interesting perspective.

This Buddha statue might have been stolen some 400 years ago by Japanese Pirates who have absolutely no relations to the present people living on Tsushima, but it's treated as a very real crime by the Korean Monks who blocked it from returning to Japan.

Not to say that this conflict isn't valid at all (not even going to bother wondering how much of it is because of Japan's treatment of Korea in WWII) but from an American perspective, it all seems rather silly, something that should be mentioned in a plaque explaining the statue's history rather than something to be fought over.
 
2013-06-03 03:08:02 PM  

Raw_fishFood: This 400 year old feud thing seems pretty silly to me, more of an interesting historical fact than something to get worked up about. Then again I am from the USA and our entire history as a country can be encapsulated by about 300 years (A little over 400 if we want to go back to Columbus). Just something of an interesting perspective.

This Buddha statue might have been stolen some 400 years ago by Japanese Pirates who have absolutely no relations to the present people living on Tsushima, but it's treated as a very real crime by the Korean Monks who blocked it from returning to Japan.

Not to say that this conflict isn't valid at all (not even going to bother wondering how much of it is because of Japan's treatment of Korea in WWII) but from an American perspective, it all seems rather silly, something that should be mentioned in a plaque explaining the statue's history rather than something to be fought over.


I don't see how you seem to think this is silly to an American perspective. Are you not aware of the massive push and controversy behind the movement in the US to repatriate the bones of Native American ancestors in museums and in university collections back to the lands of their descendents?
 
2013-06-03 03:53:48 PM  

skullkrusher: Uncle Pim: The point of Buddhism is not to get rid of desire. The point is to get rid of attachment. Desire is actually helpful; you wouldn't want to study Buddhism without desire. That's why we're in the desire realm in the 3 realms model.

well, desire for Nirvana is ironically an impediment to achieving it. The desire to cease desiring is the most noble of desires but it is still a desire that eventually must fade to achieve enlightenment. That or looping for the Dalai Lama



That's true, but desire is the very last thing to go. Every other uncontrollable emotional upheaval goes first. And to  say it "goes" is a bit incorrect, too. Nirvana is non-dual, so there is no "going" or "place to go".
 
2013-06-03 04:00:47 PM  
Strictly speaking, Jesus said "you shall love your neighbor as yourself". Also, "love you enemies". In fact, he even went so far as to say that 'love' was 'the whole of the Law fulfilled in one word'.


Does this mean I have to fap my neighbor?
 
2013-06-03 06:33:34 PM  

Uzzah: doglover: Also Buddhism plays the LOOOOOONG game. You think one eternity is a long time? The Bodhisattva are willing to deal with multiples of that to save every sentient creature.

Not for Theravadas. Once they attain enlightenment, they're outa here. The rest of y'all can figure it our for yourselves. It's the Republicanism of Buddhism.


But it can be argued that the Theravadas are wrong because any sufficiently advanced being will choose freely to help others. You can't truly be enlightened and choose to abandon others to their own devices when they could benefit from your guidance.

That's why the mahayana traditions all but erased the original schools. It doesn't make sense that a religion founded by the most compassionate of teachers would raise up those who lack compassion.
 
2013-06-03 07:50:31 PM  

maxheck: Sorta like why you never talk about the history of the Emerald Buddha in the Golden Triangle countries. 600 years and some people are *still* pissed.


Well, nobody's stealing the Jade Buddha for Universal Peace.  It stands 2.7 meters tall and weighs 4 metric tons.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jade_Buddha_for_Universal_Peace

Canadian jade, interestingly.
 
2013-06-03 08:09:09 PM  

BarkingUnicorn: maxheck: Sorta like why you never talk about the history of the Emerald Buddha in the Golden Triangle countries. 600 years and some people are *still* pissed.

Well, nobody's stealing the Jade Buddha for Universal Peace.  It stands 2.7 meters tall and weighs 4 metric tons.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jade_Buddha_for_Universal_Peace

Canadian jade, interestingly.


So it's defining characteristic is that it really really resembles, but is not perfectly like, American Jade and can't shut up about it?
 
2013-06-03 08:29:10 PM  

skullkrusher: Uncle Pim: The point of Buddhism is not to get rid of desire. The point is to get rid of attachment. Desire is actually helpful; you wouldn't want to study Buddhism without desire. That's why we're in the desire realm in the 3 realms model.

well, desire for Nirvana is ironically an impediment to achieving it. The desire to cease desiring is the most noble of desires but it is still a desire that eventually must fade to achieve enlightenment. That or looping for the Dalai Lama


Given my present levels of apathy, I'm probably well on my way to enlightenment.  I'm not sure, I don't feel like checking.

But my path will inevitably be blocked by my desire to have some scotch.
 
2013-06-03 08:42:05 PM  

Jake Havechek: And didn't Jesus say: "drop all your material shiat and hang out with me, it'll be cool".


And then disappeared.
 
Displayed 88 of 88 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report