If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Opposing Views)   Did a TSA agent touch this young woman's vagina? You make the call   (opposingviews.com) divider line 337
    More: Interesting, TSA, Ashley Jessica, TSA agents, special agents, San Diego International Airport  
•       •       •

38627 clicks; posted to Main » on 27 May 2013 at 8:44 PM (47 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



337 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2013-05-27 04:44:46 PM
i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.
 
vpb [TotalFark]
2013-05-27 04:49:47 PM
Infowars.  So I'm going with "no".
 
2013-05-27 04:53:53 PM
*Vulva
 
2013-05-27 04:54:51 PM
TSA agent allegedly touching her vagina through her clothing

Not unless there is something very seriously wrong with her anatomy.
 
2013-05-27 04:55:52 PM
Ashley Jessica, an Infowars.com activist...

farm4.staticflickr.com
 
2013-05-27 04:56:14 PM

FloydA: Not unless there is something very seriously wrong with her anatomy.


Exactly.
 
2013-05-27 05:01:10 PM
"Her ovaries looked all muslin-like!"
 
2013-05-27 05:01:33 PM

FloydA: TSA agent allegedly touching her vagina through her clothing

Not unless there is something very seriously wrong with her anatomy.


Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes. But if the TSA agent actually touched vag, that requires penetration.
 
2013-05-27 05:07:07 PM
Bathia_Mapes:
Exactly.

kiwimoogle84:
Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes. But if the TSA agent actually touched vag, that requires penetration.


I sometimes wonder if I was the only male who paid attention during that portion of sex ed class, while the rest of the boys just sat there, slack-jawed, staring at the pictures with a vague buzzing ringing in their ears.
 
2013-05-27 05:13:42 PM
Who the hell cares? I know people who would pay good money to get their genitals touched by a stranger.
 
2013-05-27 05:18:18 PM
Sniffing her fingers afterward was a dead giveaway.
 
2013-05-27 05:36:06 PM

FloydA: Bathia_Mapes:
Exactly.

kiwimoogle84:
Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes. But if the TSA agent actually touched vag, that requires penetration.


I sometimes wonder if I was the only male who paid attention during that portion of sex ed class, while the rest of the boys just sat there, slack-jawed, staring at the pictures with a vague buzzing ringing in their ears.


After the article the other day where Amanda Bynes claimed a police officer "slapped her vagina" I'm starting to wonder the same thing.
 
2013-05-27 05:41:10 PM
I've had the pat down a couple of times and the TSA agents were always very polite and very upfront about why they're going to do. I really didn't find it all that invasive. Of course I wasn't a raging asshole towards them as I've seen many passengers act.
 
2013-05-27 05:49:03 PM
Prolapsed uterus thread? I LOVE those...
 
2013-05-27 05:58:00 PM
Pussy like a Klein bottle, I tell ya.
That vagina was everywhere.
 
2013-05-27 06:06:28 PM

Bathia_Mapes: FloydA: Bathia_Mapes:
Exactly.

kiwimoogle84:
Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes. But if the TSA agent actually touched vag, that requires penetration.


I sometimes wonder if I was the only male who paid attention during that portion of sex ed class, while the rest of the boys just sat there, slack-jawed, staring at the pictures with a vague buzzing ringing in their ears.

After the article the other day where Amanda Bynes claimed a police officer "slapped her vagina" I'm starting to wonder the same thing.


Based on what I've learned here on Fark I'd guess slapping her vagina is well within the realm of possibility.
 
2013-05-27 07:37:53 PM

Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.


If you really believe that then you probably think we are fighting to freedom in +60 places around the world. The government would NEVER lie.
 
2013-05-27 07:41:24 PM
I'd like to touch her vagina with my penis.

/can't believe it hasn't been said five times already
 
2013-05-27 08:01:46 PM

propasaurus: Ashley Jessica, an Infowars.com activist...

[farm4.staticflickr.com image 250x272]


Yuuuuuuuuuuuuuuup.
 
2013-05-27 08:18:16 PM

Shostie: propasaurus: Ashley Jessica, an Infowars.com activist...

[farm4.staticflickr.com image 250x272]

Yuuuuuuuuuuuuuuup.


Thirded.
 
2013-05-27 08:24:01 PM
Damn it, another Amanda Bynes assault accus-


*clicks on link*


Oh.
 
2013-05-27 08:31:54 PM

Apos: Damn it, another Amanda Bynes assault accus-


*clicks on link*


Oh.


I think there is a distinct possibility that these two were in the same sex ed class. Both of them failed.
 
2013-05-27 08:32:46 PM

Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.


That's one big "if". Hey, do you want to know a secret trick for bypassing the "enhanced" screenings?  Claim you have an electronic boarding pass. It's okay, they won't check.
 
2013-05-27 08:36:07 PM
I've had worse going into concerts. Still remember getting cup checked by a security guy at a Bad Religion show in Detroit. It was funny to see every single guy trying to look tough while stumbling the first few steps in that awkward ow my balls pose.
 
2013-05-27 08:36:59 PM

Bathia_Mapes: Apos: Damn it, another Amanda Bynes assault accus-


*clicks on link*


Oh.

I think there is a distinct possibility that these two were in the same sex ed class. Both of them failed.


No argument there.
 
2013-05-27 08:38:23 PM

Tellingthem: It was funny to see every single guy trying to look tough while stumbling the first few steps in that awkward ow my balls pose.


I'd think trying to act tough while at a Bad Religion concert was the bigger challenge.
 
2013-05-27 08:46:45 PM
If you look hard enough for something wrong, you'll probably find it.

You know full well what a full body pat down entails, you opted for it anyway and then objected to it, apparently exactly what you were looking for.

Therefore, no one cares except those who were hoping to be outraged and infowars adherents.
 
2013-05-27 08:48:12 PM
That is not a woman.... no woman calls it a vagina.  It's a trap.
 
2013-05-27 08:48:33 PM
She came
 
2013-05-27 08:48:53 PM
if you don't want your vagina touched, take the train. why do you hate freedoms, lady?
 
2013-05-27 08:49:57 PM

jehovahs witness protection: Sniffing her fingers afterward was a dead giveaway.


Oh my god, my sinuses are in serious pain right now. I had a mouth full of rum when I read this, and I almost choked to death on the laughter. Damn you!!
 
2013-05-27 08:50:32 PM
Mulva?

somechum.com
 
2013-05-27 08:50:43 PM

propasaurus: Ashley Jessica, an Infowars.com activist...

[farm4.staticflickr.com image 250x272]


Came here to post exactly this, leaving without brain damage from reading TFA.
 
2013-05-27 08:51:53 PM

propasaurus: Ashley Jessica, an Infowars.com activist...

[farm4.staticflickr.com image 250x272]



Stopped there as well.
 
2013-05-27 08:52:06 PM

Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.


I think most of what the TSA calls screening is absolutely bullshiat that doesn't make us any safer.
 
2013-05-27 08:52:08 PM

jehovahs witness protection: Sniffing her fingers afterward was a dead giveaway.


theawesomer.com
 
2013-05-27 08:52:33 PM
I don't need any proof to convince me that all affiliated with the TSA  are otherwise unemployable, degenerate trash.
 
2013-05-27 08:53:15 PM
Knee to the septum, driving it up into the brain.

Knee to the septum, driving it up into the brain.

Knee to the septum, driving it up into the brain.
 
2013-05-27 08:53:27 PM
Nice hooters ya got there

Nice what?

The owls

Oh....
 
2013-05-27 08:53:40 PM
 
2013-05-27 08:53:41 PM
If not, I'm volunteering.

Security must always be our top priority.
 
2013-05-27 08:54:37 PM
encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com

"Touched your what?"
 
2013-05-27 08:54:39 PM

t3knomanser: Tellingthem: It was funny to see every single guy trying to look tough while stumbling the first few steps in that awkward ow my balls pose.

I'd think trying to act tough while at a Bad Religion concert was the bigger challenge.


Heh...well i'm sure whatever concert real tough guys go to would have acted the same. Oh maybe they just like getting their nuts manhandled ;)
 
2013-05-27 08:54:42 PM

Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.


It's security theatre, and apparently you like the show.
 
2013-05-27 08:54:53 PM
"Mons Pubis to the rescue !!"
 
2013-05-27 08:54:59 PM

I_Am_Weasel: If you look hard enough for something wrong, you'll probably find it.

You know full well what a full body pat down entails, you opted for it anyway and then objected to it, apparently exactly what you were looking for.

Therefore, no one cares except those who were hoping to be outraged and infowars adherents.


the fact that the choice is "let us grope you or we'll take naked pictures of you" is proof enough that the system has failed.
 
2013-05-27 08:55:19 PM
I'm a little disappointed security didn't take her to the back room after she was asking not to be touched in places after opting for a pat down.  That's damn suspicious.
 
2013-05-27 08:55:22 PM
Infowars.  Whether "yes" or "no" on the touching, the government is surely behind this!

/Wait a minute...
 
2013-05-27 08:55:35 PM
i.imgur.com
 
2013-05-27 08:56:04 PM

I_Am_Weasel: If you look hard enough for something wrong, you'll probably find it.

You know full well what a full body pat down entails, you opted for it anyway and then objected to it, apparently exactly what you were looking for.

Therefore, no one cares except those who were hoping to be outraged and infowars adherents.


We're done here. I HATE the TSA but very much this.
 
2013-05-27 08:56:07 PM
What the hell is "Infowars"?
 
2013-05-27 08:56:11 PM

Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.


Well yah sure without the TSA those people would be running in their gangs and stealing from walmart instead of your luggage but honestly I think there's better make-work schemes that could be used instead.  Make another hover dam or something, geeze.  It almost sounds like you like having your junk molested by borderline vagrants.
 
2013-05-27 08:56:58 PM
Oh, Infowars. No, I don't believe anything she has to say. And I have no love for the TSA, either.
 
2013-05-27 08:57:28 PM

NeedlesslyCanadian: What the hell is "Infowars"?


Conspiracy theory central.

Home of the UN black helicopters, Trilateral commission, 9/11 was an inside job, chemtrails, Sandy Hook was staged, etc. people.
 
2013-05-27 08:58:09 PM

vpb: Infowars.  So I'm going with "no".


I mega-loathe Infowars, too, but even a blind pig finds a truffle once in a while.

/The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
 
2013-05-27 08:58:22 PM

NeedlesslyCanadian: What the hell is "Infowars"?


lmgtfy?
 
2013-05-27 08:58:33 PM
You guys keep ragging on Infowars, but this article is proof that their "good touch/bad touch/oh and Obama is Lucifer" training video is making a difference.
 
2013-05-27 08:58:36 PM
Everyone's genitals are off limits - even terrorists' genitals. THAT is Freedom.
 
2013-05-27 08:58:56 PM
I think that young ladies vagina needs to be touched more often,
 
2013-05-27 08:59:04 PM
Ashley Jessica, an Infowars.com activist

I stopped reading right there, but I did watch the video.  The TSA rentacop totally got to 2nd base.  However, that's the point of a patdown; to make sure some crazy chick isn't hiding a ceramic knife in her bra or underbritches.
 
2013-05-27 08:59:09 PM
im torn. I hate infowars and the tsa. Just go through the scanner- the lines are much quicker ...
 
2013-05-27 08:59:14 PM

FloydA: Bathia_Mapes:
Exactly.

kiwimoogle84:
Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes. But if the TSA agent actually touched vag, that requires penetration.


I sometimes wonder if I was the only male who paid attention during that portion of sex ed class, while the rest of the boys just sat there, slack-jawed, staring at the pictures with a vague buzzing ringing in their ears.


static.flickr.com
 
2013-05-27 08:59:27 PM

doglover: Who the hell cares? I know people who would pay good money to get their genitals touched by a stranger.


Ya, we're called "married guys".

/rimshot
//sex life is fine, thanks for asking
 
2013-05-27 08:59:43 PM
Yes, that's the standard "full body grope". I always opt for that because my aunt is a doctor in Italy and she said they refused to install those machines there because they kick out waaaay more radiation than they say and more than is safe.

While they are doing the grope I inform them of this and the fact that OSHA says the TSA agents around the machines are supposed to be wearing radiation monitors. I also bring up the YouTube video that shows how to easily beat the scanners and suggest they check it out.

Never fails to spook out half of them. The other half look either bored or like they hate their job.

Either way, you won't get cancer from the full body grope.

FYI, you can easily crotch something especially if wearing a pad as they don't go digging in that area. Not to mention flat out vag packing something! Lol
 
2013-05-27 09:00:09 PM
Look "lady", it appears you and your ma got your weed thru security. Twist one up in the hotel and relax.

I also make it a point to refuse the scanner.

"I respectfully decline your invitation to be scanned, which I understand is my prerogative, and yes I realize I will be patted down"

Always have to give myself an extra 20 minute or so because often the TSA will drag their feet just to be dicks.

Also, if I don't see them put on new gloves I ask them to do that in front of me.

If you are going to be arses to travlers I think you should have to do your full job.

Imagin how quick things would change if those TSA agents had to do 10s of thousands of squats each day.

/safety theater be damned
//REFUSE THE SCAN
 
2013-05-27 09:00:16 PM
Nope
 
2013-05-27 09:00:27 PM

Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.


Ouch.
 
2013-05-27 09:00:36 PM

Bathia_Mapes: After the article the other day where Amanda Bynes claimed a police officer "slapped her vagina" I'm starting to wonder the same thing.


Is a flap slap anything like a coont punt?
 
2013-05-27 09:00:52 PM
Remember, a search like that does NOTHING to stop some nut from using an airplane for nasty purposes.  But, whatever.  Gotta be tough on terror.
 
2013-05-27 09:01:21 PM

FrancoFile: NeedlesslyCanadian: What the hell is "Infowars"?

Conspiracy theory central.

Home of the UN black helicopters, Trilateral commission, 9/11 was an inside job, chemtrails, Sandy Hook was staged, etc. people.


For me, the Sandy Hook crap crosses the line from crazy to hateful.
 
2013-05-27 09:02:24 PM

Bathia_Mapes: FloydA: Bathia_Mapes:
Exactly.

kiwimoogle84:
Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes. But if the TSA agent actually touched vag, that requires penetration.


I sometimes wonder if I was the only male who paid attention during that portion of sex ed class, while the rest of the boys just sat there, slack-jawed, staring at the pictures with a vague buzzing ringing in their ears.

After the article the other day where Amanda Bynes claimed a police officer "slapped her vagina" I'm starting to wonder the same thing.


Normally I'd question the anatomically possibility of something like that, but the term "size queen" keeps coming up with her, and I'm not one to underestimate another's ambition.
 
2013-05-27 09:02:35 PM

NeedlesslyCanadian: What the hell is "Infowars"?


All you need to know is  This is how one should respond to the presence of their 'reporters'.
(eloquent Bostonian sharing his feelings with an infowars supporter who's there trying to spin the marathon bombing as an FBI dervied plot)
 
2013-05-27 09:02:57 PM
Infowars?

fc03.deviantart.net

(well, I did read the entire thing but that was the point I stopped giving it any credibility)
 
2013-05-27 09:03:02 PM
ts1.mm.bing.net
 
2013-05-27 09:03:10 PM
Why do people even bother complaining anymore?
The TSA isn't going anywhere.

They could fist fark your granny then smear the drippings on toast and force you to eat it. And you would just so you don't miss that flight.

Other countries would revolt but Americans are well trained cows. Why fight for your dignity when you might miss an episode of honey boo boo.
 
2013-05-27 09:03:23 PM

kiwimoogle84: Labia, crotch, vulva, public region


Baby bag.
canyon.

whatever.
It's molestation.

It's not safety.

There's no probable cause, and no warrant.
 
2013-05-27 09:04:06 PM
Ohhhhh my gawwwwwwwwwwwwwd. I tried watching the video but I had to turn it off.

She basically wanted the patdown but did not want to be touched. Does she know the PURPOSE of a patdown? It is for discovering contraband.

Uptight chick: "Don't touch my breast!"
TSA agent: "Oh okay, sorry! You look like a nice kid, you probably don't have a gun or illegal drugs on you. You can go ahead!"
 
2013-05-27 09:05:09 PM

Satanic_Hamster: Infowars?

[fc03.deviantart.net image 500x569]

(well, I did read the entire thing but that was the point I stopped giving it any credibility)


Indeed. I also dislike agreeing with them on certain things. Like this. This I agree with them on. The rest of the time my ears are bleeding and my nose is bleeding and my anus is bleeding and my eyes hurt from all their derp.

It is theatre, and it's not even dinner theatre.
 
2013-05-27 09:05:39 PM

FrancoFile: NeedlesslyCanadian: What the hell is "Infowars"?

Conspiracy theory central.

Home of the UN black helicopters, Trilateral commission, 9/11 was an inside job, chemtrails, Sandy Hook was staged, etc. people.



The Queen, the Vatican, the Gettys, the Rothschilds, AND Colonel Sanders, before he went tits up
 
2013-05-27 09:05:48 PM
So if the egregious behavior of this cesspool of failed pizza drivers and thieves is pointed out  by a website with "no credibility", then it's funny and OK and this b*tch has some kind of problem?  *sigh*
 
2013-05-27 09:06:11 PM
She defiantly got at least one in the pink. If she hadn't flinched, the screener would have slipped one in the stink.

But seriously, there has got to be a better way of doing this. Why do you have to grab peoples private areas? You can do a pat down without doing that.
 
2013-05-27 09:06:49 PM
I'm a little out of the loop.

Can someone up date me on how many terrorists the TSA has caught so far?
 
2013-05-27 09:06:54 PM
TSA agents?  In my vagina?  It's more likely than you think.jpg
 
2013-05-27 09:07:15 PM

Wolf892: Why do people even bother complaining anymore?
The TSA isn't going anywhere.

They could fist fark your granny then smear the drippings on toast and force you to eat it. And you would just so you don't miss that flight.

Other countries would revolt but Americans are well trained cows. Why fight for your dignity when you might miss an episode of honey boo boo.


Sure, give the plot away halfway through the show.
 
2013-05-27 09:07:47 PM

IamTomJoad: Look "lady", it appears you and your ma got your weed thru security. Twist one up in the hotel and relax.

I also make it a point to refuse the scanner.

"I respectfully decline your invitation to be scanned, which I understand is my prerogative, and yes I realize I will be patted down"

Always have to give myself an extra 20 minute or so because often the TSA will drag their feet just to be dicks.

Also, if I don't see them put on new gloves I ask them to do that in front of me.

If you are going to be arses to travlers I think you should have to do your full job.

Imagin how quick things would change if those TSA agents had to do 10s of thousands of squats each day.

/safety theater be damned
//REFUSE THE SCAN


Exactly, I always allow for extra time also and think that if all of us opt for that they will get rid of the damn scanners and pat downs entirely.
 
2013-05-27 09:07:49 PM
I've gotten lesser intrusive pat downs while being arrested.
 
2013-05-27 09:08:41 PM
That lady has one big, protruding vag if the TSA agent did touch it.

Jesus... could drive an A-train in that thing.
 
2013-05-27 09:08:52 PM
I think I see a little pile of sand in the picture.
 
2013-05-27 09:09:02 PM

ongbok: She defiantly got at least one in the pink. If she hadn't flinched, the screener would have slipped one in the stink.

But seriously, there has got to be a better way of doing this. Why do you have to grab peoples private areas? You can do a pat down without doing that.


it's called "Profiling", but we can't do that because racism.

gotta treat the 75 year old black grandmother the same as the 27 year old male saudi national with a 1-way ticket.
 
2013-05-27 09:09:23 PM
oh cool sarah silverman got a patdown. alright.
 
2013-05-27 09:09:29 PM

FloydA: Bathia_Mapes:
Exactly.

kiwimoogle84:
Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes. But if the TSA agent actually touched vag, that requires penetration.


I sometimes wonder if I was the only male who paid attention during that portion of sex ed class, while the rest of the boys just sat there, slack-jawed, staring at the pictures with a vague buzzing ringing in their ears.


I remember a girl who didn't even know where her clitoris was.
 
2013-05-27 09:09:32 PM

ongbok: She defiantly got at least one in the pink. If she hadn't flinched, the screener would have slipped one in the stink.

But seriously, there has got to be a better way of doing this. Why do you have to grab peoples private areas? You can do a pat down without doing that.


These TSA clowns make $6/hr. For a shiat wage like that, if you additionally get a chance for some no-consequences rapefun you're gonna take it.
 
2013-05-27 09:10:12 PM

Bedstead Polisher: Ohhhhh my gawwwwwwwwwwwwwd. I tried watching the video but I had to turn it off.

She basically wanted the patdown but did not want to be touched. Does she know the PURPOSE of a patdown? It is for discovering contraband.

Uptight chick: "Don't touch my breast!"
TSA agent: "Oh okay, sorry! You look like a nice kid, you probably don't have a gun or illegal drugs on you. You can go ahead!"


You sound like you've been trained very well.
 
2013-05-27 09:10:16 PM
You can say what you ever about infowars, and mostly, I find them to be a little more than full of crap, but at least they're DOING something other than poking fun of molestation victims on a forum board while we turn into the Fourth Reich.
 
2013-05-27 09:11:19 PM

Suckmaster Burstingfoam: ongbok: She defiantly got at least one in the pink. If she hadn't flinched, the screener would have slipped one in the stink.

But seriously, there has got to be a better way of doing this. Why do you have to grab peoples private areas? You can do a pat down without doing that.

These TSA clowns make $6/hr. For a shiat wage like that, if you additionally get a chance for some no-consequences rapefun you're gonna take it.


So it's OK then?
 
2013-05-27 09:11:43 PM
technically no, since the lady is clothed and its unlikely the tsa agent also penetrated her. could the search have been preformed incorrectly and the agent groped or fondled the person being searched, of course

but since I'm on my phone and can't watch the video I'm going to have to not comment on the video itself.
 
2013-05-27 09:11:47 PM
I hate the TSA more than average, but as soon as I read she had something to do with infowars, the story had zero credibility.
 
2013-05-27 09:11:48 PM

The_Original_Roxtar: ongbok: She defiantly got at least one in the pink. If she hadn't flinched, the screener would have slipped one in the stink.

But seriously, there has got to be a better way of doing this. Why do you have to grab peoples private areas? You can do a pat down without doing that.

it's called "Profiling", but we can't do that because racism.

gotta treat the 75 year old black grandmother the same as the 27 year old male saudi national with a 1-way ticket.


You don't have to grab a persons private parts during the pat down. The only people that get that type of pat down are criminals oe suspected criminals.
 
2013-05-27 09:11:56 PM
Honestly, the level of ignorance on this website is astounding.

Like a sea cucumber, the human female's vagina is fully capable of prolapsing.  While this condition usually coincides with the window of fertility, it can also happen if the area is properly stimulated.

So yes, her vagina was touched.  That dirty, dirty TSA agent didn't even kiss her first, just got her hot and bothered and went on with her business.
 
2013-05-27 09:12:45 PM
TFA: She repeatedly asks the unidentified TSA female agent not to touch her vagina, breasts, or her mother's private parts.

"You better not touch my vagina!  Don't touch my vagina!"
.......
"YOU TOUCHED MY VAGINA!!"
 
2013-05-27 09:12:55 PM
I'm sure the TSA agents find more trannies than feel clits in their normal course of work.
 
2013-05-27 09:13:15 PM

ongbok: She defiantly got at least one in the pink. If she hadn't flinched, the screener would have slipped one in the stink.

But seriously, there has got to be a better way of doing this. Why do you have to grab peoples private areas? You can do a pat down without doing that.


because then they would just put shiat there so why do it at all then?

In other news put your drugs high and in the center of your car cause the dog.......

If your going to take away my constitutional right to fly without my dong being grabbed then for god sake someone grab my dong.

/don't really care about the freedom part anymore just lonely
 
2013-05-27 09:13:30 PM
Actually, that's not a proper patdown. When touching private areas, including breasts, you're supposed to use the BACK of the hand, never the palm. You're not checking for lumps ffs.
 
2013-05-27 09:13:37 PM

coco ebert: I've had the pat down a couple of times and the TSA agents were always very polite and very upfront about why they're going to do. I really didn't find it all that invasive. Of course I wasn't a raging asshole towards them as I've seen many passengers act.


I don't particularly have a problem with what TSA has to do, but I do have a problem with some of how they do it, including the "shut up and do what you're told" attitude I've encountered at times (I flew 150,000 miles in 2010, so I had plenty of exposure to TSA). I was once screamed at by two TSA screeners at LAX because they gave me conflicting instructions. They were literally two feet away on either side of me telling me different things and yelling when I didn't comply right away.

I also once got the "you're a threat to America" treatment at Newark, and it's only because I asked to have my things in my field of view while I was in the body scanner. Why is it that every time only one of the two x-ray machines on each side of a body scanner is open, it's always the one that causes you to stand inside the body scanner with your things behind you out of your sight? It's like they're admitting they're going to try to steal from you. But I'm sure if you asked, they'd say something like "they don't want you distracted."

I personally feel that a lot of what TSA does is pointless security theater, but fine. I can't bring a 4oz container but I can bring two 3oz containers? Whatever. Have you never noticed that toothpaste is labeled by weight, not volume? LOL. But at least act decently while you do your job.
 
2013-05-27 09:14:07 PM
After watching that video again, I'm sure that attractive 20-something woman got her naughty bits touched by the dyke prison guard character.  But to be sure, I think I'll just keep watching it a few more times with the sound off.
 
2013-05-27 09:15:09 PM
She's really getting into it.
 
2013-05-27 09:15:21 PM

FloydA: TSA agent allegedly touching her vagina through her clothing

Not unless there is something very seriously wrong with her anatomy.


not really
 
2013-05-27 09:15:35 PM

Nem Wan: Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.

It's security theatre, and apparently you like the show.


American security theater is so lame. Disheveled and sloppy TSA agents doing full body pat-downs at the airport. Or militarized police with assault rifles and armored vehicles doing house-to-house searches for suspicious crockery and fireworks powder. BORING!!
The British have it down - people fawn over the security theater there and constantly take pictures of it. Guys in black furry hats and red wool coats standing at attention in 90 degree weather. Perfectly polished swords. Lots of parades. More CCTV cameras than people. And then, if you don't renew your TV license, some guy in an overcoat visits your house, flashes a fancy ID badge, raises and eyebrow and says, "Would you mind talking to me about why you're not watching TV?"
 
2013-05-27 09:16:09 PM
I get pat down every time I fly. I am in a wheelchair - that tends to set off the scanners;) Not once have i been treated with anything but respect, courtesy, and kindness from the TSA. And their Aussie equivalents.

Mind you, I am polite to start with - expect kindness, amazing how people respond. 'Poor wickle cwipple' may account for it, but I prefer to believe most people are fundamentally ok. I know, this is Fark, you would expect after all this time* I would know better;)

* thought I had better check, almost wrote nearly a decade, and some Snarker will always check - turns out over 11 years? damn that's a lot of  wasted invigoratingly spent time
 
2013-05-27 09:16:09 PM
"Having the camera on empowered me to interrupt the pat down when I was being violated and tell them what was and wasn't acceptable," Jessica explained to Infowars.com.

facepalm.jpg
 
2013-05-27 09:16:25 PM

vpb: Infowars.  So I'm going with "no".


Infowars: stopped reading there.
 
2013-05-27 09:16:27 PM

ImpendingCynic: I don't particularly have a problem with what TSA has to do


Then you are scared shiatless chicken twatted ass wipe.
 
2013-05-27 09:17:01 PM
she's not a Muslim male aged 15-50.  Waive her through!
 
2013-05-27 09:17:10 PM
Why does this have to have an infowars connection?!

That said - I always go with the pay down, I know they don't want to pat me down and are doing a thankless and possibly unnecessary job, I don't have anything against the people I've encountered at the TSA - they all seem like folks trying to get by, but I'll be dammed if I go through a nude-photo machine that may or may not pose a cancer risk.
 
2013-05-27 09:17:21 PM
s2.postimg.org
 
2013-05-27 09:17:58 PM

coco ebert: I've had the pat down a couple of times and the TSA agents were always very polite and very upfront about why they're going to do. I really didn't find it all that invasive. Of course I wasn't a raging asshole towards them as I've seen many passengers act.


This, completely.

I just had a pat-down in the San Francisco airport and she spent way more time explaining what was going to be touched than she did actually touching it.

These twats declined to go through the scanner, opted instead for a pat down, and recorded each other.  There is nothing that will convince me that this isn't intentional outrage.
 
2013-05-27 09:18:12 PM

Adman12: *Vulva


Came for this,

\no, wait. That isn't what I mean.
\\Damn you, you are taking this out of context
\\\I mean I came because I was expecting vulva
///That is to say, I know my anatomy
//well, not MY anatomy I have no vulva
/penis
 
2013-05-27 09:19:14 PM

The_Original_Roxtar: I_Am_Weasel: If you look hard enough for something wrong, you'll probably find it.

You know full well what a full body pat down entails, you opted for it anyway and then objected to it, apparently exactly what you were looking for.

Therefore, no one cares except those who were hoping to be outraged and infowars adherents.

the fact that the choice is "let us grope you or we'll take naked pictures of you" is proof enough that the system has failed.


THIS. I mean, it's Infowars, but still...THIS.
 
2013-05-27 09:19:23 PM
THANK GOD I'm not the first person to comment that there's a difference between a vulva and a vagina.

/Words have meanings, dammit.
//Stopped sounding uneducated.
 
2013-05-27 09:19:27 PM

Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.


I'm thinking that you are an idiot
 
2013-05-27 09:20:05 PM

Dreamless: THANK GOD I'm not the first person to comment that there's a difference between a vulva and a vagina.

/Words have meanings, dammit.
//Stopped sounding uneducated.


...and, the Fates pretty much decreed that I make a typo.
 
2013-05-27 09:20:19 PM
When terrorists start packing colicy babies' recta with c4, it's all over.
 
2013-05-27 09:20:31 PM

libranoelrose: Suckmaster Burstingfoam: ongbok: She defiantly got at least one in the pink. If she hadn't flinched, the screener would have slipped one in the stink.

But seriously, there has got to be a better way of doing this. Why do you have to grab peoples private areas? You can do a pat down without doing that.

These TSA clowns make $6/hr. For a shiat wage like that, if you additionally get a chance for some no-consequences rapefun you're gonna take it.

So it's OK then?


It's to be expected.
 
2013-05-27 09:20:50 PM
The burger thread gets 31 comments on f****** memorial day and the opposing whatever troll gets all this? Ugh. Alas, poor fark! I knew him, farkers; a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy.
 
2013-05-27 09:20:54 PM
Who's the blond in the first half...is she single?  I'd touch her vagina...
 
2013-05-27 09:21:13 PM

Dreamless: THANK GOD I'm not the first person to comment that there's a difference between a vulva and a vagina.

/Words have meanings, dammit.
//Stopped sounding uneducated.


It's easier just to say c*nt.
 
2013-05-27 09:23:23 PM
In the 70s a woman airline hijacker carried a grenade in the crotch of her pants. She got on the plane.

See, in Europe, they actually know how to deal with terrorism, and they will give you the Dundee Shiela check to see if you hid a no-no object in your no-no area if you get a pat down. In America, most of the Hollywood pat-downs miss prime snuke areas.
 
2013-05-27 09:24:11 PM
Don't forget to remember those who went to war to fight fascism and gave their all so that we could live as free people in a just society.  Oh, and eat steaks and binge drink.  For freedom.
 
2013-05-27 09:24:33 PM

vygramul: Dreamless: THANK GOD I'm not the first person to comment that there's a difference between a vulva and a vagina.

/Words have meanings, dammit.
//Stopped sounding uneducated.

It's easier just to say c*nt.


Oh, it has its uses, but it suffers from a certain degree of ambiguity.
 
2013-05-27 09:25:01 PM
I've had the TSA pat-down a few times (medical hardware). They tell you exactly what they're going to do, they barely touch you with the edge of their hands, and they don't come remotely close to squeezing or penetrating anything. They have always been respectful. Then again, I've always been nice to them first--it's amazing how saying hello and good morning like they're just another human being with a lousy job can smooth things right along.

/That said, I think it's a complete waste of time and money and a terrible invasion of privacy. Let's go back to the metal detectors. I'm happy to take my chances.
 
2013-05-27 09:26:06 PM

vygramul: Dreamless: THANK GOD I'm not the first person to comment that there's a difference between a vulva and a vagina.

/Words have meanings, dammit.
//Stopped sounding uneducated.

It's easier just to say c*nt.


you see those pants? Quite possible to brush up on the ole v-hole with those
 
2013-05-27 09:26:27 PM

libranoelrose: ImpendingCynic: I don't particularly have a problem with what TSA has to do

Then you are scared shiatless chicken twatted ass wipe.


Not one bit. But I also don't see it as an invasive as this woman did. When a TSA agent is fondling my junk, I'm not offended. I'm mentally mocking him and thanking my parents for making me go to college so I don't have to fondle other guys' junk. Should the government be fondling my junk? No. But acting like an ass to the junk-fondler isn't going to change anything. I do expect them to act like decent human beings, however.

I don't believe that anything TSA does at the airport is worth anything, except the metal detectors to keep out weapons, and x-raying baggage. Asking me to pronounce my name? Pointless. Checking IDs at the gate, but announcing it before boarding? Pointless. Testing liquids bought post-security? Pointless.
 
2013-05-27 09:26:29 PM

crazytrain: The burger thread gets 31 comments on f****** memorial day and the opposing whatever troll gets all this? Ugh. Alas, poor fark! I knew him, farkers; a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy.


ummm you claim to not be new but either you really are or you don't see the word vagina in the headline

welcomebacktofark.jpg
 
2013-05-27 09:28:20 PM

eventhelosers: ongbok: She defiantly got at least one in the pink. If she hadn't flinched, the screener would have slipped one in the stink.

But seriously, there has got to be a better way of doing this. Why do you have to grab peoples private areas? You can do a pat down without doing that.

because then they would just put shiat there so why do it at all then?

In other news put your drugs high and in the center of your car cause the dog.......

If your going to take away my constitutional right to fly without my dong being grabbed then for god sake someone grab my dong.

/don't really care about the freedom part anymore just lonely


I have been searched several times in my life. Some by cops and some by the sheriffs at court buildings. The only time I ever had my shiat grabbed in a search was 3 times and that was by cops trying to intimidate me. Never at court buildings have I ever had a sheriff come near my private parts in a pat down. Whoever wrote the pat down procedures for TSA didn't know what the fark they were doing.
 
2013-05-27 09:28:55 PM

TDBoedy: FloydA: Bathia_Mapes:
Exactly.

kiwimoogle84:
Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes. But if the TSA agent actually touched vag, that requires penetration.


I sometimes wonder if I was the only male who paid attention during that portion of sex ed class, while the rest of the boys just sat there, slack-jawed, staring at the pictures with a vague buzzing ringing in their ears.

I remember a girl who didn't even know where her clitoris was.


Wow, I did not know you could lose them O_o
 
2013-05-27 09:29:49 PM

kiwimoogle84: Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes. But if the TSA agent actually touched vag, that requires penetration.


I shrugged at the headline. Then again I just figured that everyone getting personally frisked by the TSA was getting fingered like a Game of Thrones character.
 
2013-05-27 09:30:49 PM
And this is why, next time I fly, I'm going through security in a farking speedo.
 
2013-05-27 09:32:52 PM

PsiChick: The_Original_Roxtar: I_Am_Weasel: If you look hard enough for something wrong, you'll probably find it.

You know full well what a full body pat down entails, you opted for it anyway and then objected to it, apparently exactly what you were looking for.

Therefore, no one cares except those who were hoping to be outraged and infowars adherents.

the fact that the choice is "let us grope you or we'll take naked pictures of you" is proof enough that the system has failed.

THIS. I mean, it's Infowars, but still...THIS.


So true, I mean I haven't flown since the 90's but if I had to take a flight I would be dreading it from all the crazy I here about.
 
2013-05-27 09:33:49 PM

Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.


Until they start screening buses...

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/dec/20/nation/la-na-terror-checkpoi nt s-20111220

http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2011/06/tsa-swarms-8000-bus-stations -p ublic-transit-systems-yearly

http://www.tsa.gov/stakeholders/intercity-bus-security-grant-program

Other than that, fark you for even supporting this ridiculous type of security theater.
 
2013-05-27 09:34:37 PM
TDBoedy: FloydA: Bathia_Mapes:
Exactly.

kiwimoogle84:
Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes. But if the TSA agent actually touched vag, that requires penetration.


I sometimes wonder if I was the only male who paid attention during that portion of sex ed class, while the rest of the boys just sat there, slack-jawed, staring at the pictures with a vague buzzing ringing in their ears.

I remember a girl who didn't even know where her clitoris was.

Wow, I did not know you could lose them O_o


It's okay. She found it down on Second Avenue towards St. Mark's Place. It was lying on a blanket
next to a broken toaster oven.
 
2013-05-27 09:34:43 PM
TSA sucks.

But, you lost me at Infowars.

Alex Jones sucks more.
 
2013-05-27 09:34:45 PM

eventhelosers: ummm you claim to not be new but either you really are or you don't see the word vagina in the headline


And you're a white guy wearing a do-rag. Check and mate.
 
2013-05-27 09:34:56 PM
 
2013-05-27 09:35:01 PM

ongbok: eventhelosers: ongbok: She defiantly got at least one in the pink. If she hadn't flinched, the screener would have slipped one in the stink.

But seriously, there has got to be a better way of doing this. Why do you have to grab peoples private areas? You can do a pat down without doing that.

because then they would just put shiat there so why do it at all then?

In other news put your drugs high and in the center of your car cause the dog.......

If your going to take away my constitutional right to fly without my dong being grabbed then for god sake someone grab my dong.

/don't really care about the freedom part anymore just lonely

I have been searched several times in my life. Some by cops and some by the sheriffs at court buildings. The only time I ever had my shiat grabbed in a search was 3 times and that was by cops trying to intimidate me. Never at court buildings have I ever had a sheriff come near my private parts in a pat down. Whoever wrote the pat down procedures for TSA didn't know what the fark they were doing.


I hear ya, even if they were written correctly they probably wouldn't be carried out correctly 100% of the time.  I don't know I watched the Vice "This is winning" doc today.  I feel hopeless, don't care really.  People are gonna die, there is no correct answer IMHO.  Human Nature and all.
 
2013-05-27 09:36:03 PM
Putting locks on the cockpit doors solved the problem of 9/11.  Everything else is just to make people feel better.
 
2013-05-27 09:36:10 PM
Activists like this are attempting to point out the bigger picture here. It's not the security measures they are protesting, it's the reasons cited to require them and the rights which are suppressed by them. Unfortunately most people don't care about their rights so they keep calm and carry on, then crack jokes at those who do in the attempt to assimilate them back into the herd.
 
2013-05-27 09:37:15 PM

crazytrain: eventhelosers: ummm you claim to not be new but either you really are or you don't see the word vagina in the headline

And you're a white guy wearing a do-rag. Check and mate.


moran
 
2013-05-27 09:38:34 PM

Nem Wan: Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.

It's security theatre, and apparently you like the show.


It is security theatre. Which is why I'd rephrase the original statement as:
I'm thinking that if the TSA screenings are keeping people from thinking other people are going to do bad shiat, and it keeps them flying, which keeps ticket prices low, then I'm OK with that.
 
2013-05-27 09:39:29 PM
I have had the pat down several times and it is no big deal. Though I do request that they change their gloves in front of me. I am more worried about catching the flu or some bug than of having my crotch touched.

I can't see the point of throwing a temper tantrum at the TSA agents. They are just trying to put food on their tables.

If you oppose the TSA's security measures then complain to your congress critters.
 
2013-05-27 09:40:09 PM
Anyone who still uses air travel while the TSA Gestapo has the right to touch your body, should just shut the hell up and take it.

/ hasn't and will not fly until this security theater is terminated.
 
2013-05-27 09:40:09 PM
IF YOU ARE SUCH farkING COWARDS THAT YOU DEFEND THE TSA BULLshiat THEN YOU ARE TOO farkING COWARDLY TO BE PATRIOTS. DO HUMANITY A FAVOR AND THROW YOURSELF IN A VOLCANO NOW. MAYBE THE GODS OR YOUR FEUDAL MASTERS OR LORDS OR ALL OF THE ABOVE IN ONCE PACKAGE OF CAVEMAN CRAZY YOU PREFER WILL HAVE MERCY ON YOU AND REWARD YOUR SACRIFICE BY SPARING YOUR VILLAGE, BUT MY BET IS ON CTHULU

you farking cowardly farking farks
 
2013-05-27 09:40:44 PM
www.lossofprivacy.com
 
2013-05-27 09:41:46 PM

t3knomanser: Tellingthem: It was funny to see every single guy trying to look tough while stumbling the first few steps in that awkward ow my balls pose.

I'd think trying to act tough while at a Bad Religion concert was the bigger challenge.


Was it 1983 or 2003? Makes a difference.
 
2013-05-27 09:43:24 PM
"Assume the surrender position in the radiation machine or submit to a Freedom-Groping, citizen."
 
2013-05-27 09:44:15 PM

eventhelosers: moran


Good job on figuring out how to post that picture of yourself on fark. When you're 80, your great-grandchildren are going to ask "Grandpa, were you some kind of badass mexican gangster in your 20s or just some white suburban poser?"
 
2013-05-27 09:44:44 PM

coco ebert: I've had the pat down a couple of times and the TSA agents were always very polite and very upfront about why they're going to do. I really didn't find it all that invasive. Of course I wasn't a raging asshole towards them as I've seen many passengers act.


And immediately we have managed to eek out exactly what kind of person would be an InfoWars activist.

Ya know, I don't like the TSA any more than anyone else does.  But if were going to knock that liquor store over can we PLEASE have someone other than Alex Jones behind the wheel of the getaway car?
 
2013-05-27 09:44:49 PM

sewnandsilent: Activists like this are attempting to point out the bigger picture here. It's not the security measures they are protesting, it's the reasons cited to require them and the rights which are suppressed by them. Unfortunately most people don't care about their rights so they keep calm and carry on, then crack jokes at those who do in the attempt to assimilate them back into the herd.


I disagree.

Being against Freedom Fisting is distinctly un-American.

We need more security, not less.

/And remember kiddies, only take off the ball gag when it's time to get the hot, fishy Freedom Juice down your dirty little whore mouth.
 
2013-05-27 09:47:33 PM
I wish I could laugh at what Americans accept but it's just too sad.
 
2013-05-27 09:49:33 PM
Given that the vagina is the interior canal and not the exterior "lips" (the labia), unless the TSA agent slipped her fingers inside the woman, the answer is "no".
 
2013-05-27 09:49:56 PM
She is from infowars?  She went there and deliberately moved her body so her vagina would be touched, just to generate so faux outrage.  Why else would she just happen to have someone filming her screening?
 
vpb [TotalFark]
2013-05-27 09:50:17 PM

coco ebert: I've had the pat down a couple of times and the TSA agents were always very polite and very upfront about why they're going to do. I really didn't find it all that invasive. Of course I wasn't a raging asshole towards them as I've seen many passengers act.


Well, it's kind of a meme.
 
2013-05-27 09:50:51 PM

Volkl Yokel: FrancoFile: NeedlesslyCanadian: What the hell is "Infowars"?

Conspiracy theory central.

Home of the UN black helicopters, Trilateral commission, 9/11 was an inside job, chemtrails, Sandy Hook was staged, etc. people.

The Queen, the Vatican, the Gettys, the Rothschilds, AND Colonel Sanders, before he went tits up


Just remember: Jones doesn't believe in the lizard people. Because THAT would just be crazy.


sseye: IF YOU ARE SUCH farkING COWARDS THAT YOU DEFEND THE TSA BULLshiat THEN YOU ARE TOO farkING COWARDLY TO BE PATRIOTS. DO HUMANITY A FAVOR AND THROW YOURSELF IN A VOLCANO NOW. MAYBE THE GODS OR YOUR FEUDAL MASTERS OR LORDS OR ALL OF THE ABOVE IN ONCE PACKAGE OF CAVEMAN CRAZY YOU PREFER WILL HAVE MERCY ON YOU AND REWARD YOUR SACRIFICE BY SPARING YOUR VILLAGE, BUT MY BET IS ON CTHULU

you farking cowardly farking farks


static01.mediaite.com

Read this in his voice.
 
2013-05-27 09:51:53 PM

tinfoil-hat maggie: PsiChick: The_Original_Roxtar: I_Am_Weasel: If you look hard enough for something wrong, you'll probably find it.

You know full well what a full body pat down entails, you opted for it anyway and then objected to it, apparently exactly what you were looking for.

Therefore, no one cares except those who were hoping to be outraged and infowars adherents.

the fact that the choice is "let us grope you or we'll take naked pictures of you" is proof enough that the system has failed.

THIS. I mean, it's Infowars, but still...THIS.

So true, I mean I haven't flown since the 90's but if I had to take a flight I would be dreading it from all the crazy I here about.


Flying is actually not bad at all. I think I was patted down once in the last few years flying domestic. That was only because I forgot I had change in my pocket.
 
Juc
2013-05-27 09:52:11 PM
This whole TSA mess is a bunch of bullshiat, people should be getting paid to do something productive, not  to feel people up.
I mean, I've had them grab my balls when I was going through security in LAX before, and though they had a light touch, it was still a terrible hand-job.
also the whole TSA thing is just to make people feel safe in the air, and I suspect the governments know that.

and even if it does make people safer, I'd rather take the risk of the one in a million chance that someone will blow me up with a shampoo bottle, if it meant we could just live like unafraid shiats.

what's that british poster from WW2 say?
Keep Calm and Cary on
PS don't touch my balls if you're not going to do a good job of it

or something like that.
 
2013-05-27 09:55:12 PM

some_beer_drinker: if you don't want your vagina touched, take the train. why do you hate freedoms, lady?

Taking the train isn't exactly a way to avoid the TSA.

Unless they were doing some sort of invasive screening, the answer would technically be no.  If you gave her the benefit of the doubt on language, let the video be the guide.
 
2013-05-27 09:55:22 PM
she was obviously determined ahead of time to confirm her supposition she'd get "fondled"

she's a rabble rousing provocateur ...
 
2013-05-27 09:55:37 PM
If the criminal court system has taught us anything, it's that if a woman says you touched her vagina, you touched her vagina.

You may have been three counties and 150 miles away at the time, but that doesn't make you any less guilty in the eyes of the law.

By those standards, the above video was tantamount to a gang rape committed by a skinhead zombie biker gang.
 
2013-05-27 09:56:11 PM
I find is sad that the same ignorant farks who were all up in arms against the "muslums" and were crying for more security are now the ignorant farks who cry rape and conspiracy because of the security that was put in because they were crying for it.

the TSA was the second biggest mistake we made because of 9/11 the first was of course the Iraq "war".
 
2013-05-27 09:57:11 PM
You don't need data to know that the fact that the TSA is doing their job, that it stops things from getting on planes.  Just knowing you're going to get patted down makes people plan around that when the decide what to take with them.

You call it security theatre, as if it is Zero effective.  That is just silly to take that stance.  Also, the insistence that the people of the TSA are some moronic underclass of undeserving americans, is disgusting on it's face.  Granted there are some losers in that line of work, our society is rampant with losers.  These people at least have jobs and contribute to the economy.

To the point of sexual harassment, it isn't like the TSA is walking the crowds singling out people to goose.  They check people who are getting on planes.  And like RON PAUL would say, plane travel is not in the constitution.

/and infowars is about as ridiculous as anything gets, but they sure know what they're doing
//outrage generator
 
2013-05-27 09:57:24 PM
 Meh, still waiting a few years for when all of the weird TSA cancer clusters start popping up.
 
2013-05-27 09:57:41 PM

Gyrfalcon: t3knomanser: Tellingthem: It was funny to see every single guy trying to look tough while stumbling the first few steps in that awkward ow my balls pose.

I'd think trying to act tough while at a Bad Religion concert was the bigger challenge.

Was it 1983 or 2003? Makes a difference.


1996 I think. I remember seeing the suicide machines around the same time.
 
2013-05-27 09:58:29 PM
Welcome to the US, and 9/11 next we do the ultrasound scan inside to make sure you don't carry items that might ot might not be assembles into a WMS or deadly gas...dispense unit.

Im ok with Coke and Pepsi ect. perhaps also agreed with the Die hard movies but keep your flapping AR15 ( M16 ) and you paranoid in the US,  TAS and all the other stuff you developed is all bull shiat anybody who been or a airport more than ones knows this so just flapping drop it now, get some other things to focus on, like us hunger...
 
2013-05-27 09:58:47 PM

Adman12: *Vulva


kiwimoogle84: FloydA: TSA agent allegedly touching her vagina through her clothing

Not unless there is something very seriously wrong with her anatomy.

Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes. But if the TSA agent actually touched vag, that requires penetration.


That war is over, we lost. 99% of the people I know, male or female, call that region the "vagina".
 
2013-05-27 09:59:17 PM
She'd have to have one of two different serious prolapse conditions in order for that to happen.
 
2013-05-27 10:00:50 PM

crazytrain: eventhelosers: moran

Good job on figuring out how to post that picture of yourself on fark. When you're 80, your great-grandchildren are going to ask "Grandpa, were you some kind of badass mexican gangster in your 20s or just some white suburban poser?"


i love you man
 
2013-05-27 10:02:28 PM
Really? Why did I have to read/watch this.  Now I want to side with TSA.  That TSA lady was nothing but professional.
 
2013-05-27 10:02:29 PM

Juc: what's that british poster from WW2 say?
Keep Calm and Carry on


...and don't call out Islamists in the press, since truth is offensive - even if they commit murder out in the open.

/sarcasm
//Those extremists got off too easy for murder
///And the press won't dare report the truth about what kind of person the murderer was.
 
2013-05-27 10:03:11 PM

Zeppelininthesky: Flying is actually not bad at all.


I didn't stop flying after all the new security theater, scanners, and pat-downs. Before, though, if it was more than 3 or 4 hours away, I'd take a plane. I lived near a good airport, it wasn't much hassle to get through to the plane, prices were way better. Today, if it's continental US, I'll drive if I have the choice. You skip all the hassle and higher costs, you stop and eat what you want when you want, sleep in a decent bed when tired, always on the lookout for fun diversions, etc. The calculus of when to drive vs fly changed big-time with all the changes in the last 10 years.
 
2013-05-27 10:03:17 PM

Zeppelininthesky: tinfoil-hat maggie: PsiChick: The_Original_Roxtar: I_Am_Weasel: If you look hard enough for something wrong, you'll probably find it.

You know full well what a full body pat down entails, you opted for it anyway and then objected to it, apparently exactly what you were looking for.

Therefore, no one cares except those who were hoping to be outraged and infowars adherents.

the fact that the choice is "let us grope you or we'll take naked pictures of you" is proof enough that the system has failed.

THIS. I mean, it's Infowars, but still...THIS.

So true, I mean I haven't flown since the 90's but if I had to take a flight I would be dreading it from all the crazy I here about.

Flying is actually not bad at all. I think I was patted down once in the last few years flying domestic. That was only because I forgot I had change in my pocket.


Well that's good to hear, I just hear such bad this about it now, well you know.
 
2013-05-27 10:03:41 PM
Homeland Security Threat Level is "wet".
 
2013-05-27 10:04:18 PM
This is so wrong but...

cdn01.cdn.justjared.com

alt.coxnewsweb.com

www.gotceleb.com

i.i.com.com
 
2013-05-27 10:04:31 PM
She seems uptight. I enjoy the patdowns, especially when the woman "officer" is extra biatchy about it. Rar.
 
2013-05-27 10:05:12 PM

eggrolls: vpb: Infowars.  So I'm going with "no".

I mega-loathe Infowars, too, but even a blind pig finds a truffle once in a while.

/The enemy of my enemy is my friend.


You realize that pigs find truffles by scent, not by sight, yes?
 
2013-05-27 10:05:36 PM
Infowars runs its own sort of "false flag" operation. This looked like an attempt to create an incident by the passenger with the TSA.
 
2013-05-27 10:06:47 PM

Suckmaster Burstingfoam: These TSA clowns make $6/hr.


The starting wage is more than twice that figure.  And there is also medical benefits available to even part-time employees for the same deductibles as full-time employees, which is an absolute steal for a part-time job.  And it is also a job with a government pension, which is something you pretty much can't get in the private sector.
 
2013-05-27 10:10:08 PM

Adman12: *Vulva


Ah_Freakin_men.....

But this is more than intrusive. She doesn't look Muslim, so no reason.
 
2013-05-27 10:10:11 PM
0-media-cdn.foolz.us
 
2013-05-27 10:13:39 PM

Tellingthem: well i'm sure whatever concert real tough guys go to would have acted the same.


Probably. I haven't the foggiest where tough guys actually go, but I know it sure ain't Bad Religion shows. Nerds go to those.
 
2013-05-27 10:14:39 PM

Bslim: I don't need any proof to convince me that all affiliated with the TSA and Infowars are otherwise unemployable, degenerate trash.


FTFY

/BSABSFarkEmBoth
 
2013-05-27 10:15:08 PM

Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.


Wow, if you believe the screenings actually keep people from doing bad shiat then, well, I guess it's amazing you can type given your condition.
 
2013-05-27 10:15:08 PM

Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.


Thing is they're not keeping anyone safer. If they were, I'd have far less problem with it. Can you name a single plot that was foiled by TSA screening procedures? We've stopped a number of attempted attacks since 9/11 but none of them via TSA screenings.
 
2013-05-27 10:15:11 PM

Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.


This is the type of American that has led to this America.
 
2013-05-27 10:16:07 PM
She seems like she would be a real treat in the sack.

// Penis goes where?
 
2013-05-27 10:17:09 PM

kazikian: Thing is they're not keeping anyone safer. If they were, I'd have far less problem with it. Can you name a single plot that was foiled by TSA screening procedures? We've stopped a number of attempted attacks since 9/11 but none of them via TSA screenings.


TSA keeps finding a *record* number of firearms being brought to screening checkpoints.  *Record* numbers of them loaded.  The weekly numbers keep increasing, and last week was an all-time record for the past 10 years.
 
2013-05-27 10:18:57 PM

Some_Local_Deity: Bslim: I don't need any proof to convince me that all affiliated with the TSA and Infowars are otherwise unemployable, degenerate trash.

FTFY

/BSABSFarkEmBoth


Just out of curiosity which would be the better job for degenerate trash.
/You know for a friend.
 
2013-05-27 10:21:50 PM
 
2013-05-27 10:22:19 PM

mrmopar5287: it is also a job with a government pension, which is something you pretty much can't get in the private sector.


Why would that be, I wonder?
 
2013-05-27 10:22:58 PM
Infowar people are idiots. I've flown well over one thousand trips in the past two years alone - no incidents, no problems. Only thing TSA can actually do better is screening luggage they have a nice habit of just throwing crap all over the place and repacking it like they don't care.

/Oh no your vag got touched, guess what sugar? Take the bus or train and STFU and deal with it like the rest of us
//these kind of people who complain about the TSA are the ones who are not stuck behind these assholes while they play their little temper tantrums - I had to wait 30 minutes to go through screening because some wacko wouldnt remove his shoes - another flight we were all boarded ready to go and some asshole who had to much to drink started having his tantrum about not using the bathroom right away, he should of went BEFORE we boarded, yet he wanted to be in the front of the line
///slashes - seriously people are farking retards
 
2013-05-27 10:28:33 PM
Sounds like shes making it something that isnt there.  In a way I feel this was all planned to make TSA looks bad.

About 99.9% of people that fly knows the "drill" and I am sure these women did but they choice to make an issue of it. It was all staged on their part.
 
2013-05-27 10:33:18 PM
Missing obligatory:

25.media.tumblr.com
 
2013-05-27 10:34:57 PM

Misconduc: Infowar people are idiots. I've flown well over one thousand trips in the past two years alone



You fly commercial every day?  Twice most days?  For two years?


i92.photobucket.com
 
2013-05-27 10:37:36 PM

poison_amy: Misconduc: Infowar people are idiots. I've flown well over one thousand trips in the past two years alone


You fly commercial every day?  Twice most days?  For two years?


[i92.photobucket.com image 320x243]


Shes trying to tell us that shes an air marshal.
 
2013-05-27 10:39:09 PM

mrmopar5287: Suckmaster Burstingfoam: These TSA clowns make $6/hr.

The starting wage is more than twice that figure.  And there is also medical benefits available to even part-time employees for the same deductibles as full-time employees, which is an absolute steal for a part-time job.  And it is also a job with a government pension, which is something you pretty much can't get in the private sector.


More than TWICE $6? Heck that compares favourably to a cop salary! I feel safer now kthxbye
 
2013-05-27 10:41:05 PM

mrmopar5287: TSA keeps finding a *record* number of firearms being brought to screening checkpoints. *Record* numbers of them loaded. The weekly numbers keep increasing, and last week was an all-time record for the past 10 years.


Also, tractor production is at an all time high.
 
2013-05-27 10:41:22 PM

t3knomanser: Tellingthem: well i'm sure whatever concert real tough guys go to would have acted the same.

Probably. I haven't the foggiest where tough guys actually go, but I know it sure ain't Bad Religion shows. Nerds go to those.


Well the only real defense I'll put up was at least in my neck of the woods that is what the "tough kids" listened too. We really weren't a major music scene so stuff like Slayer, COC, BR, Pantera, Tool, NIN whatever were all pretty much under the same umbrella. We listened to everything and anything rock. One of the biggest pits i've ever seen was at a beastie boys set during lollapalooza. I remember at a local club they would finish up with a pailhead song and the place would go crazy. So maybe nerds went to BR but so did a bunch of country rednecks.
 
2013-05-27 10:43:48 PM

sewnandsilent: Activists like this are attempting to point out the bigger picture here. It's not the security measures they are protesting, it's the reasons cited to require them and the rights which are suppressed by them. Unfortunately most people don't care about their rights so they keep calm and carry on, then crack jokes at those who do in the attempt to assimilate them back into the herd.


Seconded. Bummed out by how many people see an article from a source they've decided doesn't echo their own views right back at them and then immediately decide they don't want to read it and that it couldn't possibly point out something of interest or make a good point.

/No fan of Alex Jones.
//On the right (or the "right" - not a Republican), but if friends were to point out (as they often do, since of course their biased news sources are so much better than mine) an article from HuffPo, MSNBC, alternet, or Mother Jones, I don't reject it out of hand because it comes from the "other side." 1) open-minded and well-read are usually two sides of the same coin, 2) at the very least, keep your enemies closer.
 
2013-05-27 10:45:43 PM

Bslim: I don't need any proof to convince me that all affiliated with the TSA  are otherwise unemployable, degenerate trash.


Pretty much. It's pretty much a make work project for people who washed out of the real economy.
 
2013-05-27 10:48:08 PM

Bathia_Mapes: FloydA: Bathia_Mapes:
Exactly.

kiwimoogle84:
Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes. But if the TSA agent actually touched vag, that requires penetration.


I sometimes wonder if I was the only male who paid attention during that portion of sex ed class, while the rest of the boys just sat there, slack-jawed, staring at the pictures with a vague buzzing ringing in their ears.

After the article the other day where Amanda Bynes claimed a police officer "slapped her vagina" I'm starting to wonder the same thing.


It's easy to confuse her being slapped in the vagina when she is used to being slapped on the chin.
 
2013-05-27 10:50:13 PM
TSA made that Dinah Moe hum?
 
2013-05-27 10:51:01 PM
I don't know, I'll have to examine her vagina personally.
 
2013-05-27 10:54:49 PM

gibbon1: Bslim: I don't need any proof to convince me that all affiliated with the TSA  are otherwise unemployable, degenerate trash.

Pretty much. It's pretty much a make work project for people who washed out of the real economy.


get used to it, i'd bet my taint hairs there's more to come
 
2013-05-27 10:57:14 PM

Krymson Tyde: Bathia_Mapes: FloydA: Bathia_Mapes:
Exactly.

kiwimoogle84:
Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes. But if the TSA agent actually touched vag, that requires penetration.


I sometimes wonder if I was the only male who paid attention during that portion of sex ed class, while the rest of the boys just sat there, slack-jawed, staring at the pictures with a vague buzzing ringing in their ears.

After the article the other day where Amanda Bynes claimed a police officer "slapped her vagina" I'm starting to wonder the same thing.

Based on what I've learned here on Fark I'd guess slapping her vagina is well within the realm of possibility.


I have no idea what this police officer did to Ms. Bynes, but if she had recently been fisted there might be enough room for something like slapping to occur. Anyway, I was under the impression that she wanted her vagina to be murdered rather than slapped. I don't know how one would go about doing that, but it sounds a little out there even for a perv like me.
 
2013-05-27 10:59:13 PM
My grandfather used to always tell me you can never trust a person whose name is two first names, had something to do with a car dealer, anyhow,
 
2013-05-27 11:01:47 PM

mrmopar5287: kazikian: Thing is they're not keeping anyone safer. If they were, I'd have far less problem with it. Can you name a single plot that was foiled by TSA screening procedures? We've stopped a number of attempted attacks since 9/11 but none of them via TSA screenings.

TSA keeps finding a *record* number of firearms being brought to screening checkpoints.  *Record* numbers of them loaded.  The weekly numbers keep increasing, and last week was an all-time record for the past 10 years.


They're probably planting them to make it look like they're doing something.
 
2013-05-27 11:02:34 PM

kazikian: Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.

Thing is they're not keeping anyone safer. If they were, I'd have far less problem with it. Can you name a single plot that was foiled by TSA screening procedures? We've stopped a number of attempted attacks since 9/11 but none of them via TSA screenings.


you act as if the TSA only exists to deal with 9/11 style attacks
 
2013-05-27 11:03:28 PM

timelady: I get pat down every time I fly. I am in a wheelchair - that tends to set off the scanners;) Not once have i been treated with anything but respect, courtesy, and kindness from the TSA. And their Aussie equivalents.


So long as you kowtow properly you rarely have trouble with the TSA (unless they find something to steal, that is.)

Where you're likely to get trouble is if for some reason you don't or can't kowtow properly.  (For example, the poster above who was getting conflicting directions.)

poison_amy: These twats declined to go through the scanner, opted instead for a pat down, and recorded each other. There is nothing that will convince me that this isn't intentional outrage.


It won't load for me so I can't comment directly.  However, the reality is that the backscatter units do put out x-rays and would be illegal if the law actually applied to them.  The same exemption also means the machines aren't checked, they might be putting out more than they're supposed to.  One should opt out of them and one shouldn't have to put up with sexual molestation to do so.  (Note:  Millimeter wave machines are only hazardous to your modesty.)

Misconduc: I've flown well over one thousand trips in the past two years alone - no incidents, no problems. Only thing TSA can actually do better is screening luggage they have a nice habit of just throwing crap all over the place and repacking it like they don't care.

/Oh no your vag got touched, guess what sugar? Take the bus or train and STFU and deal with it like the rest of us
//these kind of people who complain about the TSA are the ones who are not stuck behind these assholes while they play their little temper tantrums - I had to wait 30 minutes to go through screening because some wacko wouldnt remove his shoes - another flight we were all boarded ready to go and some asshole who had to much to drink started having his tantrum about not using the bathroom right away, he should of went BEFORE we boarded, yet he wanted to be in the front of the line
///slashes - seriously people are farking retards


You shouldn't have to put up with being molested in order to fly.  The old style scanners were more effective anyway at TSAs <b>supposed</b> mission.  The new stuff is far worse at seeing a well-concealed bomb (you can walk through a nude-o-scope with everything you need to bring down the plane and have no chance of being detected.  It is admittedly a some-assembly-required process but nothing complex) but it does a better job at their <b>true</b> mission--drugs.

As for the guy not removing his shoes--there are medical reasons for this.  TSA knows this.  If there was a big delay it was because TSA was trying to make him miss his flight, not because he was in the wrong.

FlyingBacon: Sounds like shes making it something that isnt there. In a way I feel this was all planned to make TSA looks bad.

About 99.9% of people that fly knows the "drill" and I am sure these women did but they choice to make an issue of it. It was all staged on their part.


Knowing the drill doesn't make it right.
 
2013-05-27 11:03:37 PM

Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.


Congrats on being part of the problem. Nothing like compromising a principle just to make you feel "Safer".
 
2013-05-27 11:08:18 PM
4.bp.blogspot.com

Like Thomas Jefferson said, "Sometimes a felony assault on a federal officer is worth it."

I'm paraphrasing of course.
 
2013-05-27 11:09:14 PM

eventhelosers: Pretty much. It's pretty much a make work project for people who washed out of the real economy.

get used to it, i'd bet my taint hairs there's more to come


A couple of years ago I spent a little time in Southern Arizona.  At least of those places the immigration hysteria is just seems justification to hire border control guards in southern Arizona and California.  You drive through those counties and it's clear the economy blew away when all the mines closed, now there is nothing but the border control.  Otherwise there is no reason for anyone to be there at all.  Considering Mexican immigration is down and falling, you wonder what's going to happen when they can't make their numbers anymore.
 
2013-05-27 11:13:15 PM
kiwimoogle84: blah blah blah

Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes.

???

Only at certain bars, or so I'm told.
 
2013-05-27 11:13:36 PM

DeerNuts: eggrolls: vpb: Infowars.  So I'm going with "no".

I mega-loathe Infowars, too, but even a blind pig finds a truffle once in a while.

/The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

You realize that pigs find truffles by scent, not by sight, yes?


Yeah, because THAT'S the point of the adage.
 
2013-05-27 11:15:23 PM

flucto: Prolapsed uterus thread? I LOVE those...



Yeah, they keep popping out a lot, don't they?
 
2013-05-27 11:23:28 PM

The_Original_Roxtar: I_Am_Weasel: If you look hard enough for something wrong, you'll probably find it.

You know full well what a full body pat down entails, you opted for it anyway and then objected to it, apparently exactly what you were looking for.

Therefore, no one cares except those who were hoping to be outraged and infowars adherents.

the fact that the choice is "let us grope you or we'll take naked pictures of you" is proof enough that the system has failed.


I don't disagree. But what's she trying to prove? Fight the naked pictures test too -- it doesn't require making a fake porn video.

Unlike the Infowars "patriots," I remember whose rhetoric pushed us into this situation to begin with. Protecting our freedoms, my arse.
 
2013-05-27 11:23:55 PM
i.qkme.me
 
2013-05-27 11:26:10 PM

Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.


"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin
 
2013-05-27 11:27:07 PM

Zeppelininthesky: tinfoil-hat maggie: PsiChick: The_Original_Roxtar: I_Am_Weasel: If you look hard enough for something wrong, you'll probably find it.

You know full well what a full body pat down entails, you opted for it anyway and then objected to it, apparently exactly what you were looking for.

Therefore, no one cares except those who were hoping to be outraged and infowars adherents.

the fact that the choice is "let us grope you or we'll take naked pictures of you" is proof enough that the system has failed.

THIS. I mean, it's Infowars, but still...THIS.

So true, I mean I haven't flown since the 90's but if I had to take a flight I would be dreading it from all the crazy I here about.

Flying is actually not bad at all. I think I was patted down once in the last few years flying domestic. That was only because I forgot I had change in my pocket.


Ditto.

I was wearing cargo pants that had snaps on the knee.
 
2013-05-27 11:29:02 PM

ongbok: She defiantly got at least one in the pink. If she hadn't flinched, the screener would have slipped one in the stink.

But seriously, there has got to be a better way of doing this. Why do you have to grab peoples private areas? You can do a pat down without doing that.


Maybe they could use some kind of scanner, so they wouldn't have to touch people at all.
 
2013-05-27 11:37:06 PM

mrmopar5287: Suckmaster Burstingfoam: These TSA clowns make $6/hr.

The starting wage is more than twice that figure.  And there is also medical benefits available to even part-time employees for the same deductibles as full-time employees, which is an absolute steal for a part-time job.  And it is also a job with a government pension, which is something you pretty much can't get in the private sector.


I have a pension ... Private sector too .. Profit sharing, 12% total compensation 401k contribution, and full medical. You mad you work a shiatty job where your superiors take financial advantage of you? I wouldn't accept a job that offered less.
 
2013-05-27 11:37:54 PM

Gyrfalcon: I was wearing cargo pants


Cargo pant's? So you're saying there is a chance right ; )
 
2013-05-27 11:40:48 PM

thenumber5: kazikian: Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.

Thing is they're not keeping anyone safer. If they were, I'd have far less problem with it. Can you name a single plot that was foiled by TSA screening procedures? We've stopped a number of attempted attacks since 9/11 but none of them via TSA screenings.

you act as if the TSA only exists to deal with 9/11 style attacks


Ok, ok, I'll be fair... We obviously need some kind of security at airports. But the TSA was after all created as a response to 9/11, and hasn't had much track record with terrorist plots; the FBI has stopped a few plots, passengers stopped the shoe bomber... I have no real issue with the TSA, they never did anything terrible to me, but... Well, everything I've read about those new full-body scanners says they're useless. They are now implementing new scanners which seem much better, AND don't blast you with radiation (now, I don't remember which type is which); but we already spent millions on those old worthless scanners. As far as enhanced pat-downs: are they really going to find things regular pat-downs won't? They seem to have been implemented in response to "implanted" or keistered bombs, but they certainly won't find those. Etc. etc. I'm not against the TSA; I merely hope for intelligent screening vs. security theater.
 
2013-05-27 11:41:08 PM
Wow, I'm surprised by the level of suck-up in this thread. We've come to think being treated like criminals is OK?

They should defund TSA, junk the scanners, and go back to pre-9/11 security. The money spent on TSA should go to better intelligence and law enforcement. 9/11 could have easily been prevented if the FBI and CIA had done their job.
 
2013-05-27 11:43:30 PM

Archimedes' Principal: Anyone who still uses air travel while the TSA Gestapo has the right to touch your body, should just shut the hell up and take it.

/ hasn't and will not fly until this security theater is terminated.


This.
 
2013-05-27 11:43:49 PM

tinfoil-hat maggie: Zeppelininthesky: tinfoil-hat maggie: PsiChick: The_Original_Roxtar: I_Am_Weasel: If you look hard enough for something wrong, you'll probably find it.

You know full well what a full body pat down entails, you opted for it anyway and then objected to it, apparently exactly what you were looking for.

Therefore, no one cares except those who were hoping to be outraged and infowars adherents.

the fact that the choice is "let us grope you or we'll take naked pictures of you" is proof enough that the system has failed.

THIS. I mean, it's Infowars, but still...THIS.

So true, I mean I haven't flown since the 90's but if I had to take a flight I would be dreading it from all the crazy I here about.

Flying is actually not bad at all. I think I was patted down once in the last few years flying domestic. That was only because I forgot I had change in my pocket.

Well that's good to hear, I just hear such bad this about it now, well you know.


It also depends on the city you fly to. Some are worse as far as security.
 
2013-05-27 11:43:53 PM

zenobia: ongbok: She defiantly got at least one in the pink. If she hadn't flinched, the screener would have slipped one in the stink.

But seriously, there has got to be a better way of doing this. Why do you have to grab peoples private areas? You can do a pat down without doing that.

Maybe they could use some kind of scanner, so they wouldn't have to touch people at all.


The scanners still suck. Once we develop a good one, this whole issue will go away... And I mean a good one that DOESN'T show you naked. I'm envisioning one that just screams "bomb" at the TSA agent in a loud obnoxious voice and preferably British accent.
 
2013-05-27 11:44:51 PM
You can fit some mighty big pieces of exploding plastic salamis up those things.  They should do what they did on Flesh Gordon and strip the women naked and shake them up and down to see if anything falls out.
 
2013-05-27 11:45:53 PM
Nope.
 
2013-05-27 11:46:06 PM

adamatari: Wow, I'm surprised by the level of suck-up in this thread. We've come to think being treated like criminals is OK?

They should defund TSA, junk the scanners, and go back to pre-9/11 security. The money spent on TSA should go to better intelligence and law enforcement. 9/11 could have easily been prevented if the FBI and CIA had done their job.


This more or less sums up all my thoughts on the subject. We had good air security before the TSA. The 9/11 terrorists didn't even bring anything forbidden on board. They weren't caught by agencies that exist specifically to catch such people. But instead of punishing the Feds, we somehow decided to punish the traveling public.
 
2013-05-27 11:48:01 PM

adamatari: Wow, I'm surprised by the level of suck-up in this thread. We've come to think being treated like criminals is OK?

They should defund TSA, junk the scanners, and go back to pre-9/11 security. The money spent on TSA should go to better intelligence and law enforcement. 9/11 could have easily been prevented if the FBI and CIA had done their job.


i think TSA is sponsored by Cisco, to promote online meetings, instead.
 
2013-05-27 11:52:25 PM

FlyingBacon: poison_amy: Misconduc: Infowar people are idiots. I've flown well over one thousand trips in the past two years alone


You fly commercial every day?  Twice most days?  For two years?


[i92.photobucket.com image 320x243]

Shes trying to tell us that shes an air marshal.


Like her alt?
 
2013-05-27 11:52:53 PM

gibbon1: A couple of years ago I spent a little time in Southern Arizona. At least of those places the immigration hysteria is just seems justification to hire border control guards in southern Arizona and California. You drive through those counties and it's clear the economy blew away when all the mines closed, now there is nothing but the border control. Otherwise there is no reason for anyone to be there at all. Considering Mexican immigration is down and falling, you wonder what's going to happen when they can't make their numbers anymore.


The Border Patrol has 21,444 agents, about 86 percent of them stationed along the southern border.
That's a higher total number of agents than in any year going back to at least 1924, according to data from the U.S. Office of Immigration Statistics.
The biggest bump in Border Patrol staffing came under President George W. Bush. Between 2001 and 2009, the number of agents rose by about 14 percent a year on average. Between 2009 and 2001, under Obama, it has increased by about 3 percent per year


Because 9/11 changed everything. And let's not forget that our border fence isn't completed yet either.  And drones. They need more drones.
 
2013-05-27 11:53:30 PM

Fecal Conservative: Archimedes' Principal: Anyone who still uses air travel while the TSA Gestapo has the right to touch your body, should just shut the hell up and take it.

/ hasn't and will not fly until this security theater is terminated.

This.


I would almost be willing to agree with that if a) we had decent alternatives in the country, like high-speed rail and b) there was no risk of these same procedures coming to those types of travel. Remember the "T" stands for transportation, not airplane, and you can bet your ass the second there's a terrorist attack on Amtrak, the same shiat will come to every rail station. Then what options will you have? Driving everywhere? No, the problem is all our security measures are REACTIVE instead of PREVENTATIVE. We don't have souped-up screening procedures at airports because airplanes are now more vulnerable after 9/11. Airplanes were always vulnerable; they're thin pressurized metal tubes wherein any attack is guaranteed to kill at least a few hundred people without much effort. And now after Boston, police in Denver asked people not to carry backpacks to a race there, as I'd suddenly marathons were more likely targets. It's all REACTIVE, get it? If I was a terrorist, I'd be busy looking for a place no one has ever hot before, because security there will be almost unchanged from pre-9/11 days.
 
2013-05-27 11:55:57 PM

cryinoutloud: gibbon1: A couple of years ago I spent a little time in Southern Arizona. At least of those places the immigration hysteria is just seems justification to hire border control guards in southern Arizona and California. You drive through those counties and it's clear the economy blew away when all the mines closed, now there is nothing but the border control. Otherwise there is no reason for anyone to be there at all. Considering Mexican immigration is down and falling, you wonder what's going to happen when they can't make their numbers anymore.

The Border Patrol has 21,444 agents, about 86 percent of them stationed along the southern border.
That's a higher total number of agents than in any year going back to at least 1924, according to data from the U.S. Office of Immigration Statistics.
The biggest bump in Border Patrol staffing came under President George W. Bush. Between 2001 and 2009, the number of agents rose by about 14 percent a year on average. Between 2009 and 2001, under Obama, it has increased by about 3 percent per year

Because 9/11 changed everything. And let's not forget that our border fence isn't completed yet either.  And drones. They need more drones.


I'm actually more ok with drones than a lot of the other nonsense.
 
2013-05-28 12:03:52 AM

kazikian: Fecal Conservative: Archimedes' Principal: Anyone who still uses air travel while the TSA Gestapo has the right to touch your body, should just shut the hell up and take it.

/ hasn't and will not fly until this security theater is terminated.

This.

I would almost be willing to agree with that if a) we had decent alternatives in the country, like high-speed rail and b) there was no risk of these same procedures coming to those types of travel. Remember the "T" stands for transportation, not airplane, and you can bet your ass the second there's a terrorist attack on Amtrak, the same shiat will come to every rail station. Then what options will you have? Driving everywhere? No, the problem is all our security measures are REACTIVE instead of PREVENTATIVE. We don't have souped-up screening procedures at airports because airplanes are now more vulnerable after 9/11. Airplanes were always vulnerable; they're thin pressurized metal tubes wherein any attack is guaranteed to kill at least a few hundred people without much effort. And now after Boston, police in Denver asked people not to carry backpacks to a race there, as I'd suddenly marathons were more likely targets. It's all REACTIVE, get it? If I was a terrorist, I'd be busy looking for a place no one has ever hot before, because security there will be almost unchanged from pre-9/11 days.


Your grammer and spelling faults notwithstanding you make a compelling argument.

However, assume terrorists know that we are reactive and assume it to be a ploy! Then they are likely to estimate that  their best purchase is through the well worn paths with a novel physical approach. Perhaps ceramic knives or a mini-EMP; who knows their intent? The only certainty is that 70 or 80 years at most from now you'll be pushing up daises. Stop being a farktard! Life is for living, don't fear those who will harm you! You're here for but a short while, enjoy it and don't waste time.
 
2013-05-28 12:05:37 AM

italie: She seems like she would be a real treat in the sack.

// Penis goes where?


You've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It's just common sense
 
2013-05-28 12:13:12 AM
There's a difference between the standard pat down and the "resolution" pat down.  When they touch Mr. Snappy, that's the resolution one.  But the screeners will commonly give the resolution pat down to people they don't like or making a fool of themselves.
 
2013-05-28 12:15:15 AM
It is good to know that some of you say it doesn't count since it is over clothing, "need anatomy lessons" style.  I'll be looking for your wives and sisters.
 
2013-05-28 12:28:06 AM

Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.


Assholes like you always say that, like the only place to travel to is within the USA. Ever heard of a trans-Atlantic flight?
 
2013-05-28 12:32:16 AM

Some Bass Playing Guy: Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.

I think most of what the TSA calls screening is absolutely bullshiat that doesn't make us any safer.


The TSA is a farce and has never made anyone safer. Biggest waste of tax dollars (outside of a war) ever
 
2013-05-28 12:38:02 AM

Wolf892: Why do people even bother complaining anymore?
The TSA isn't going anywhere.

They could fist fark your granny then smear the drippings on toast and force you to eat it. And you would just so you don't miss that flight.

Other countries would revolt but Americans are well trained cows. Why fight for your dignity when you might miss an episode of honey boo boo.


This. This is why I enjoy traveling ion other countries far more than the USA. The farking conservative pussies in this country have made sure we all get farked over for their fear of the Muslim.
 
2013-05-28 12:46:42 AM

Fecal Conservative: kazikian: Fecal Conservative: Archimedes' Principal: Anyone who still uses air travel while the TSA Gestapo has the right to touch your body, should just shut the hell up and take it.

/ hasn't and will not fly until this security theater is terminated.

This.

I would almost be willing to agree with that if a) we had decent alternatives in the country, like high-speed rail and b) there was no risk of these same procedures coming to those types of travel. Remember the "T" stands for transportation, not airplane, and you can bet your ass the second there's a terrorist attack on Amtrak, the same shiat will come to every rail station. Then what options will you have? Driving everywhere? No, the problem is all our security measures are REACTIVE instead of PREVENTATIVE. We don't have souped-up screening procedures at airports because airplanes are now more vulnerable after 9/11. Airplanes were always vulnerable; they're thin pressurized metal tubes wherein any attack is guaranteed to kill at least a few hundred people without much effort. And now after Boston, police in Denver asked people not to carry backpacks to a race there, as I'd suddenly marathons were more likely targets. It's all REACTIVE, get it? If I was a terrorist, I'd be busy looking for a place no one has ever hot before, because security there will be almost unchanged from pre-9/11 days.

Your grammer and spelling faults notwithstanding you make a compelling argument.

However, assume terrorists know that we are reactive and assume it to be a ploy! Then they are likely to estimate that  their best purchase is through the well worn paths with a novel physical approach. Perhaps ceramic knives or a mini-EMP; who knows their intent? The only certainty is that 70 or 80 years at most from now you'll be pushing up daises. Stop being a farktard! Life is for living, don't fear those who will harm you! You're here for but a short while, enjoy it and don't waste time.


Terrorists certainly do assume we are reactive. I don't want to use Tsarnaev as an example, because his attack was so hasty, random, and poorly thought-out, but targeting a marathon was pretty clever; there's not much security there. Rather than being novel, why not find one of the less-protected paths? I am sure our government isn't all that stupid, and has taken pains to protect the less obvious and less-visible potential targets. But in those cases, there's no need to tell anyone about it. Since everyone went batshiat-crazy about airports, placing massive amounts of VISIBLE security there serves to make people feel safer. But what good does it really do? It's hard to say, but I'm willing to bet a return to pre-9/11 levels of security would change nothing. Of course, the pro-TSA crowd can rebut that by asking how many lives I'm willing to bet, and there's no good answer to that. Because 100% control is impossible, and you can't measure how well security is working by pointing out there have been no attacks; on the other hand, you can absolutely tell security isn't working when there is an attack. So any attack will be used to justify more security, until a more sophisticated attack happens, or an attack somewhere less-secure happens, and we again have to expand security upwards of outwards or both, ad infinitum. That's what I mean by "reactive."

PS. Spelling and grammar errors? I found only one: I'd instead of if... Thanks, autocorrect.
 
2013-05-28 12:49:41 AM

my lip balm addiction: Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.

Assholes like you always say that, like the only place to travel to is within the USA. Ever heard of a trans-Atlantic flight?


And for that matter, what happens when some idiot bombs a bus, and the TSA starts patting down all the hobos at the Greyhound terminal? How far do you want to take it? Until an agent is sitting in your garage and taking a blood test before you get in your car every morning?
 
2013-05-28 01:07:00 AM

Fecal Conservative: Your grammer and spelling faults notwithstanding you make a compelling argument.


Such delicious irony. ;-)
 
2013-05-28 01:07:09 AM

rappy: italie: She seems like she would be a real treat in the sack.

// Penis goes where?

You've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It's just common sense


The Fark?
 
2013-05-28 01:30:26 AM

NeedlesslyCanadian: What the hell is "Infowars"?


Think of it like fox news for libertarian self-entitled twits.
 
2013-05-28 01:32:20 AM

crazytrain: The burger thread gets 31 comments on f****** memorial day and the opposing whatever troll gets all this? Ugh. Alas, poor fark! I knew him, farkers; a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy.


I guess opposing erosion of civil liberty is trolling now.
 
2013-05-28 01:44:25 AM

Gleeman: Adman12: *Vulva

kiwimoogle84: FloydA: TSA agent allegedly touching her vagina through her clothing

Not unless there is something very seriously wrong with her anatomy.

Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes. But if the TSA agent actually touched vag, that requires penetration.

That war is over, we lost. 99% of the people I know, male or female, call that region the "vagina".


WE HAVE NOT LOST!  People just don't know any better.

/SAVE THE VULVA!
 
2013-05-28 01:55:24 AM

Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.


The pat downs are such a joke, they arent going to stop anything. They are already inhibited from screening for likely bombers, so they waste time on white girls and congress-critters. The pat down motions are stilted and the agents are concentrating more on not groping your nads than they are on whether you have a bomb up your butt. If the last five or six attempts have taught us anything it is that they avoid the screening areas..... shoes, then underwear, etc......

Actually they seem to have switched completely from air travel to other crowds. The TSA is never going to keep up. Its just a union of low paid largely unskilled and low IQ employees going through rote repetitions of federal guidelines.

Lets compare them to the kind of security that Israel employs in its airlines, where they arent afraid to ask you about your political opinions of islam and Israel, and to screen you based on where you are from instead of how well you fit a random cross section of America.
 
2013-05-28 01:59:01 AM
Bleh. I feel like there's a lot of stupid absolutism going on in this thread.

I get sick of people equating "not doing everything" with "doing nothing". To say the TSA has prevented or accomplished absolutely nothing is asinine. I think some example links were provided on the third or fourth page. Even barring that, they have at the very least raised the barrier of entry to bringing bombs or weapons on a plane. Do you instead want to argue that what they're accomplishing is not congruous to the cost of operation? If so, then I won't just discount your opinion immediately.

Even worse is the sentiment that some people seem to have that every last TSA agent is a mentally retarded, filthy perverted crook. To those of you who make statements claiming or implying this: do you have any idea how stupid you sound? Are there TSA agents who happen to be filthy perverted crooks? Yeah, probably. I bet they're not in the majority though. And what about all those who aren't? Does it ever occur to you that, maybe, just maybe, if you don't treat someone like scum, they might be less likely to act like/become scum? It's like getting into a fight with the cop writing you a ticket. No matter how bad of a tantrum you throw, the cop will never change his/her mind... you only stand to make things worse for yourself. Sure, you can disagree vehemently with the TSA's procedures/philosophy/existence, but as at least one person pointed out, write your representatives? What the hell purpose does it serve to take it out on the bottom-tier mook who's just trying to put dinner on the table?
 
2013-05-28 02:03:52 AM
All of this is necessary to get people used to having their person violated by the Government.


img23.imageshack.us
 
2013-05-28 02:53:24 AM
Am I the only one who wouldn't care about being touched for a legit screening process? I wouldn't get off on it, either, I just wouldn't care. I'm sure the workers absolutely hate their job so I don't get why people seem to have this vision of a lecherous agent grabbing them all over.
 
2013-05-28 03:03:10 AM

kiwimoogle84: FloydA: TSA agent allegedly touching her vagina through her clothing

Not unless there is something very seriously wrong with her anatomy.

Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes. But if the TSA agent actually touched vag, that requires penetration.



You must be one of those people who thinks "wears her heart on her sleeve" is just a metaphor.
 
2013-05-28 03:07:10 AM

propasaurus: Ashley Jessica, an Infowars.com activist...

[farm4.staticflickr.com image 250x272]


There were words? I just went straight to the video

/girl was clearly there with an agenda
//girl also needs to register her vagina on world records because unless she has the biggest vagina in the world, the woman didn't touch her vagina
 
2013-05-28 03:14:37 AM

doglover: Who the hell cares? I know people who would pay good money to get their genitals touched by a stranger.


It's kinda nice that you come in here to inform us that you're too stupid to understand the issue, but most of us could have guessed that by now.
 
2013-05-28 03:45:31 AM

tinfoil-hat maggie: TDBoedy: FloydA: Bathia_Mapes:
Exactly.

kiwimoogle84:
Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes. But if the TSA agent actually touched vag, that requires penetration.


I sometimes wonder if I was the only male who paid attention during that portion of sex ed class, while the rest of the boys just sat there, slack-jawed, staring at the pictures with a vague buzzing ringing in their ears.

I remember a girl who didn't even know where her clitoris was.

Wow, I did not know you could lose them O_o



massivelyattacked.files.wordpress.com
Feels her pain.
 
2013-05-28 03:48:51 AM

WorkingInParadise: There is only one solution for this problem


images.starpulse.com
Approves.
 
2013-05-28 04:41:38 AM
"Jessica and her mother took turns recording each other after they chose the pat down instead of going through a body scanner machine"

Stopped reading right there, if they chose the pat down, then they were looking for this to happen so they could make a big deal out of it.
 
2013-05-28 04:55:31 AM

thenumber5: you act as if the TSA only exists to deal with 9/11 style attacks


Maybe if the screeners on 9/11 had been looking for weapons instead of small amounts of marijuana  and cocaine...

Maybe if the Bush administration was looking for Islamic Nutters instead of trying to restart the cold war....

Maybe if the FBI and CIA weren't engaging in a turf war pissing match with each other...

Maybe if we worried less about cunning plans and skullduggery overseas and instead focused on promoting democracy and civil society...

Maybe if people would man up and stop pissing themselves over every little thing.

Okay enough what if's  Quiz time.

Q:  Which cost more the Fukushima earth quake or some Saudi Arabian punks highjacking a couple of planes?
Ans: Our political leaders retarded response to the 2008 financial meltdown.
 
2013-05-28 04:56:01 AM
"Don't TSA me, man".
 
2013-05-28 05:54:43 AM
She needs to go shopping and buy some pants that are the correct length.
 
2013-05-28 05:56:40 AM

FloydA: TSA agent allegedly touching her vagina through her clothing

Not unless there is something very seriously wrong with her anatomy.


Prolapse?
 
2013-05-28 05:57:25 AM

Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat,


But they're not.
 
2013-05-28 06:04:19 AM

mrmopar5287: kazikian: Can you name a single plot that was foiled by TSA screening procedures?

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/25/18491498-54-loaded-guns-se i zed-at-airports-last-week?lite


Fail. How many of those were "plots"?

"Plots" don't even need to get past the TSA (eg. Boston Bombings). If people really do want to get bombs past the TSA, they can just put the bad stuff up their ass and sail through security.

If bombs aren't going off all over the place it's because there's no terrorists, not because people are being groped at airports.
 
Xai
2013-05-28 06:05:22 AM

Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.


The price we have to pay? That might be accurate IF the TSA actually did anything; - In the last 12 years, the TSA has caught 0 terrorists.

Tell me again why it is neccecary?
 
2013-05-28 06:11:32 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hI8bOkvK1vQ">http://www.youtube.com/wa tch?v=hI8bOkvK1vQ

Japs makes fun of TSA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddtmt-9ey6k">http://www.youtube.com/wa tch?v=Ddtmt-9ey6k

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIV3DVxKBO8">http://www.youtube.com/w atch?v=fIV3DVxKBO8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7ZFyZAzBak">http://www.youtube.com/w atch?v=A7ZFyZAzBak
 
2013-05-28 06:40:44 AM

eggrolls: vpb: Infowars.  So I'm going with "no".

I mega-loathe Infowars, too, but even a blind pig finds a truffle once in a while.

/The enemy of my enemy is my friend.


Wow, you are dumb. Seriously, you would choose Alex Jones and his flock of dodo birds? You need to take two steps!

/I have been against the TSA since its formation
//and the 'patriot' act
///slashies come in threes!
 
2013-05-28 06:41:20 AM

kiwimoogle84: FloydA: TSA agent allegedly touching her vagina through her clothing

Not unless there is something very seriously wrong with her anatomy.

Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes. But if the TSA agent actually touched vag, that requires penetration.


Pudendum
 
2013-05-28 07:10:13 AM

bearded clamorer: Pussy like a Klein bottle, I tell ya.



And my first cup of coffee goes everywhere.
 
2013-05-28 07:39:29 AM
I dunno. Did the TSA agent's hand go numb from the cold?
 
2013-05-28 07:50:05 AM
I would suggest that we have two types of flights available; flights cleared by the TSA and, for the people to skittish to be patted down and terrorists, flights not cleared by the TSA.
 
2013-05-28 07:52:08 AM
That's why you have a female conduct the search, so they can get all up in that sh*t. Cause ya know the vagina is really just a wallet for drugs and bombs and guns oh my
 
2013-05-28 07:53:34 AM

t3knomanser: Tellingthem: It was funny to see every single guy trying to look tough while stumbling the first few steps in that awkward ow my balls pose.

I'd think trying to act tough while at a Bad Religion concert was the bigger challenge.


LULZ
 
2013-05-28 08:18:28 AM
The more you know: people often conceal illegal items in areas of their bodies that are considered taboo for strangers to touch. If you choose to subject yourself to a pat-down instead of going through a detector to avoid unreasonable searches, you're doing it wrong.

Did the TSA agent touch her chest and crotch? Yes. Is that standard operating procedure for a pat-down? Yes. Was it sexual in nature? Almost certainly not.

My balls have been cupped more times than I can count going into soccer games in Brazil (where people like to bring in fire-crackers). It never occurred to me to feel bad for myself, but I definitely felt bad for the cop whose turn it was to cup hundreds of balls. I feel the same sympathy for TSA agents.
 
2013-05-28 08:18:47 AM

Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.


You're a moron.
 
MFK
2013-05-28 08:20:40 AM

The_Original_Roxtar: ongbok: She defiantly got at least one in the pink. If she hadn't flinched, the screener would have slipped one in the stink.

But seriously, there has got to be a better way of doing this. Why do you have to grab peoples private areas? You can do a pat down without doing that.

it's called "Profiling", but we can't do that because racism.

gotta treat the 75 year old black grandmother the same as the 27 year old male saudi national with a 1-way ticket.


there are ways of profiling that don't involve racism. The TSA SHOULD be profiling for certain kinds of behavior or actions, both of which are far more likely to direct you to an actual threat than skin color or country of origin.

That being said, this girl was being a dick for the cameras and making a scene where there shouldn't have been one.

/My contempt for the TSA and my loathing of all things infowars are currently locked in a death match.
 
2013-05-28 08:40:46 AM
The TSA agent tried WAY too hard to work with her instead of turning her away from flying.
 
2013-05-28 08:49:16 AM
Ashley Jessica, an Infowars.com activist unemployed dropout, recently uploaded a video to http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=XvT40xUr50k">Yo uTube of a TSA agent allegedly touching her vagina through her clothing during an airport pat down went attention whoring at the airport.

/shorter and more accurate
 
2013-05-28 08:51:10 AM
Her clothes fit pretty tight on her, it's obvious at a glance that she isn't carrying anything dangerous, not even a box cutter.  Unless, of course, the terrorist object is actually hidden in her vagina.  I recommend a full body cavity search, just to make sure.
 
2013-05-28 08:54:15 AM
Every person that is frisked or irradiated is another win for the terrorists.  Every time a person has to take off their shoes is a win for the terrorists, and every time they have to shuffle off to the side to put them back on is a win for the terrorists.  The TSA works for the terrorists, hassling Americans for the past 12 years with very little to show for it.
 
2013-05-28 09:01:55 AM
The moment a plane goes down due to a bomb EVERYONE will ask why security wasn't tighter. In the meantime, jackbooted fascists tried to touch my vagina!
 
2013-05-28 09:08:41 AM
hate how the tsa is run,
they (like other gubmint agencies) hire the lowest instead of the best and brightest
fark the tsa

that being said
she's an attention whore, fark her
 
2013-05-28 09:11:36 AM
If a woman was going to hide something there, it would be on the inside where a TSA agent can't grope it.

With pants that tight, what's the agent feeling for anyway? Anything stuffed down there would be obvious.
 
2013-05-28 09:13:42 AM
bv2112: My balls have been cupped more times than I can count going into soccer games in Brazil (where people like to bring in fire-crackers). It never occurred to me to feel bad for myself, but I definitely felt bad for the cop whose turn it was to cup hundreds of balls. I feel the same sympathy for TSA agents.

So because you're OK with it, everybody else ought to be as well, right...? Including the rape victims.

Sorry, no. A civilized society doesn't grope everybody's genitals for government-run security theater.
 
2013-05-28 09:14:23 AM
So Wrong?
rubbermallet.org
 
2013-05-28 09:17:43 AM

r0cj07p: Ashley Jessica, an Infowars.com activist unemployed dropout, recently uploaded a video to http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=XvT40xUr50k">Yo uTube of a TSA agent allegedly touching her vagina through her clothing during an airport pat down went attention whoring at the airport.

/shorter and more accurate


True, but somebody has to do it...

apeshits.files.wordpress.com
 
2013-05-28 09:32:01 AM

Wolf892: Other countries would revolt but Americans are well trained cows. Why fight for your dignity when you might miss an episode of honey boo boo.


That f-ing show had - at its peak - 3 million viewers.   There are 313 million people in this country.

/just sayin.
 
2013-05-28 09:33:53 AM

Babwa Wawa: Wolf892: Other countries would revolt but Americans are well trained cows. Why fight for your dignity when you might miss an episode of honey boo boo.

That f-ing show had - at its peak - 3 million viewers.   There are 313 million people in this country.

/just sayin.


1% viewership is still way too high.
 
2013-05-28 09:39:28 AM

sharphead: That is not a woman.... no woman calls it a vagina.  It's a trap.


The vagina? I've been caught by that trap.
 
2013-05-28 09:52:51 AM

FloydA: Bathia_Mapes:
Exactly.

kiwimoogle84:
Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes. But if the TSA agent actually touched vag, that requires penetration.


I sometimes wonder if I was the only male who paid attention during that portion of sex ed class, while the rest of the boys just sat there, slack-jawed, staring at the pictures with a vague buzzing ringing in their ears.


Yes, you are a special little snowflake.
 
2013-05-28 10:03:21 AM

flaflaflowhigh: Putting locks on the cockpit doors solved the problem of 9/11.  Everything else is just to make people feel better.


Solution was even simpler, a policy change from "Do whatever the hijacker says" was all that was necessary.

Before 9/11 anyone looking to take over a plane wanted it taken somewhere and maybe some political prisoners released. The hijacker intended to live and therefore keeping them calm and happy kept everyone alive. With the advent of suicide hijackers the pilots and attendants are now free to deal with the situation in an aggressive manner.
 
2013-05-28 10:08:29 AM

Stoker: All of this is necessary to get people used to having their person violated by the Government.


[img23.imageshack.us image 480x297]


There it is!
Step by step, slowly I turn,

Incremental enslavement, it is the new agenda.
 
2013-05-28 10:12:20 AM

Digitalstrange: flaflaflowhigh: Putting locks on the cockpit doors solved the problem of 9/11.  Everything else is just to make people feel better.

Solution was even simpler, a policy change from "Do whatever the hijacker says" was all that was necessary.

Before 9/11 anyone looking to take over a plane wanted it taken somewhere and maybe some political prisoners released. The hijacker intended to live and therefore keeping them calm and happy kept everyone alive. With the advent of suicide hijackers the pilots and attendants are now free to deal with the situation in an aggressive manner.


How stupid do you have to be to believe appeasement is a viable plan?
Why, just as stupid as allowing the Bullchit Patriot Act to stand.

Inch by Nanny Agenda inch, the politicians' Bosses win.
 
2013-05-28 10:14:38 AM
"She receive hair on chest and her vagine hang like sleeve of wizard."

...
maybe it just hung low?
 
2013-05-28 10:43:15 AM

Gyrfalcon: Zeppelininthesky: tinfoil-hat maggie: PsiChick: The_Original_Roxtar: I_Am_Weasel: If you look hard enough for something wrong, you'll probably find it.

You know full well what a full body pat down entails, you opted for it anyway and then objected to it, apparently exactly what you were looking for.

Therefore, no one cares except those who were hoping to be outraged and infowars adherents.

the fact that the choice is "let us grope you or we'll take naked pictures of you" is proof enough that the system has failed.

THIS. I mean, it's Infowars, but still...THIS.

So true, I mean I haven't flown since the 90's but if I had to take a flight I would be dreading it from all the crazy I here about.

Flying is actually not bad at all. I think I was patted down once in the last few years flying domestic. That was only because I forgot I had change in my pocket.

Ditto.

I was wearing cargo pants that had snaps on the knee.


Well, heeellloooo Mr. Fancy Pants....
 
2013-05-28 10:47:56 AM
I'm leaning toward a false flag operation.
 
2013-05-28 11:16:10 AM
Infowars chick - "I want to fly under my rules, not yours."

TSA - "Do you have your own plane?"

Infowars chick - "No."

TSA - "Spread um"
 
2013-05-28 11:28:10 AM

Suckmaster Burstingfoam: These TSA clowns make $6/hr. For a shiat wage like that, if you additionally get a chance for some no-consequences rapefun you're gonna take it.


The hourly rate's low but they make up for it in tips.
 
2013-05-28 11:37:27 AM

boyvoyeur: Infowars chick - "I want to fly under my rules, not yours."

TSA - "Do you have your own plane?"

Infowars chick - "No."

TSA - "Spread um"


That's why the whole thing makes no sense. If you have your own plane, or charter a plane, you aren't even in the same part of the airport as those clowns.

If it's your plane, either owned or rented, you can bring a shotgunon board if you want.
 
2013-05-28 11:37:41 AM
They took my cork screw away from me.    I told my wife I had picked it up at a wine conference we had flown back from without problems.   My wife pointed out that we had flown OUR AIRPLANE back from that conference...ooops.

Last week I went through and had a cheap (disposable) pen in my shirt pocket.    It didn't set off the WTMD but the agent insisted I go back and put it in a bin.   Screw it, you keep it.
 
2013-05-28 11:38:33 AM
Unfortunately in the US the TSA pockets the money from selling confiscated or abandoned stuff at security.

In Australia they turn it over to the Royal Flying Doctors Service (a charity) and they sell them.
 
2013-05-28 01:40:40 PM

Joce678: Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat,

But they're not.


When was the last airliner hijacked?  When did the TSA start?

You were saying?
 
2013-05-28 01:59:45 PM
When I read stories like this I think back to the time I had to go through a Chinese security check. I was pulled to a side room with four airport security officers inside two female and two male. I was made to strip completely nude and one of the female officers preformed the inspection without any protective gloves. This female officer took hold of my penis like a person would if they intended to masturbate me and she lifted it up down and to both sides with her other hand doing the same to my testicles. Giving that I have an extreme libido, her face close enough to feel her breath and she wasn't quick about it I became erect which in no why deterred her actions. When she completed her inspection she stood up and then proceeded to ask me a lot of questions as I stood there nude with an erection. Eventually the two male officers left the room when something came in on one of their radios and I was left with the two female officers. The reason I was told that the two females were present is, because they spoke English and I will stop the story there. It seems some guy's gloved hand touching my penis through my clothes is no real big deal to me so these stories come off as more of an attention grab.
 
2013-05-28 02:45:46 PM

TommyymmoT: boyvoyeur: Infowars chick - "I want to fly under my rules, not yours."

TSA - "Do you have your own plane?"

Infowars chick - "No."

TSA - "Spread um"

That's why the whole thing makes no sense. If you have your own plane, or charter a plane, you aren't even in the same part of the airport as those clowns.

If it's your plane, either owned or rented, you can bring a shotgunon board if you want.


Actually, while it's probably true you could, in real life, walking onto the flight line with anything that even looks like a gun is going to cause you some problems.

Of course, if you have your own plane, chances are you aren't at a big airport.  Chances are you are a few miles away at a GA field where there is NO security beyond a fence, and the worst thing you have to worry about is the fuel truck operator being late.
 
2013-05-28 02:55:12 PM

Maturin: I would suggest that we have two types of flights available; flights cleared by the TSA and, for the people to skittish to be patted down and terrorists, flights not cleared by the TSA.


Seriously though why not offer Americans an actual choice between flights with full screening and ones without any screening at all?
 
2013-05-28 02:57:48 PM

Kahabut: Joce678: Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat,

But they're not.

When was the last airliner hijacked?  When did the TSA start?

You were saying?


This is the same exact logic that proves the effectiveness of the tiger-repelling rock... Namely, faulty logic...

/Or, was that the joke?
 
2013-05-28 03:03:31 PM

Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat, then that's the price we have to pay. this twinkee can take the farking bus if she has a problem.


And we could frisk every newborn baby on the 1 in a BILLION to the power of a GOOGLEPLEX off-chance that one of those little farkers could have smuggled a shiv out of the vagina (fashioned from a long forgotten IUD).

But is it REALLY worth it though to be so PARANOID that you impose your paranoia on EVERYONE else (the VAST MAJORITY of which  are totally innocent)?
(That's a rhetorical question btw.... that answer of which (for those too dense to understand) is NO.)

BTW, it's "twinkie", not "twinkee". O_o
 
2013-05-28 03:08:15 PM

RobSeace: Kahabut: Joce678: Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat,

But they're not.

When was the last airliner hijacked?  When did the TSA start?

You were saying?

This is the same exact logic that proves the effectiveness of the tiger-repelling rock... Namely, faulty logic...

/Or, was that the joke?


I'd say it was halfway between.

I'm making fun of the op's logic, by using something equally spurious.

That being said, in all seriousness, there have been no hijackings since the TSA started... which is at least suggestive that they are doing something right, but certainly not conclusive, or even correlated.  In the real world, nothing is black and white.  The TSA might be stopping hijackings just by existing, despite their apparent lack of skill, acumen, or intelligence.  The fact is we don't actually know.  So it could be either way.  (and in either case, it's probably not worth it.)
 
2013-05-28 03:36:43 PM
So much stupid in this thread

"Seriously though why not offer Americans an actual choice between flights with full screening and ones without any screening at all?"

In an industry that operates in perpetual bankruptcy, this would not be feasible

"And we could frisk every newborn baby on the 1 in a BILLION to the power of a GOOGLEPLEX off-chance that one of those little farkers could have smuggled a shiv out of the vagina (fashioned from a long forgotten IUD)."

This is the result of political correctness and not racially profiling people.  We can't racially target a group no matter how many times they pull shenanigans.

"Unfortunately in the US the TSA pockets the money from selling confiscated or abandoned stuff at security."

Is this supposed to mean the TSA employees are taking pocketknives to the local pawn shop?  TSA collects the items and change and rolls the money back into their funding.  If it didn't come from there, congress would carve that out of a school lunch program for blind kids.

"The TSA is never going to keep up. Its just a union of low paid largely unskilled and low IQ employees going through rote repetitions of federal guidelines."

Unskilled and low IQ, is that the new code for black people?  There was a time when i might have shared this opinion out of ignorance.  I just participated in the training of almost 200 TSA officers at Atlanta.  The nation's busiest airport.  As a whole, a pretty sharp group of people.  I was surprised at how many had bachelors and associates degrees.  I think the impression is that these people are hired at the same jobs fair that McDonalds uses.  These are vetted employees of the government.  Complete with extensive background checks and clearances.  They take their jobs pretty seriously.  Unfortunately retards get through any process and with TSA they get weeded out in a public manner.

TSA is a big dumb slow bureaucracy, but it is trying.  if they didn't give a shiat about us we would still have naked body scanners in the airports.  We also wouldn't have training rooms being run all day long so officers could learn how to appropriately treat people in wheelchairs.

Also, the checkpoint is the most visible face of TSA.  The people who man it do so for 8 to 10 hours.  That's 8 to 10 hours of enduring miserable assholes who just spent 15 minutes waiting in a line, while being under the pressure of being fired a thousand different ways.  I'm surprised it does not get ugly on a daily basis.  You get what you give.  Be cheery on your next trip through and maybe you'll have a better experience.  It's never going to be pleasant, but it can be not full of suck
 
2013-05-28 03:38:53 PM

Kahabut: That being said, in all seriousness, there have been no hijackings since the TSA started... which is at least suggestive that they are doing something right, but certainly not conclusive, or even correlated.


It's more suggestive that no one with bad intent has actually bothered to try to get past them... They keep routinely failing all tests of their effectiveness, unless they're informed in advance to be on the lookout for those testers...
 
2013-05-28 04:03:54 PM

Kahabut: TommyymmoT: boyvoyeur: Infowars chick - "I want to fly under my rules, not yours."

TSA - "Do you have your own plane?"

Infowars chick - "No."

TSA - "Spread um"

That's why the whole thing makes no sense. If you have your own plane, or charter a plane, you aren't even in the same part of the airport as those clowns.

If it's your plane, either owned or rented, you can bring a shotgunon board if you want.

Actually, while it's probably true you could, in real life, walking onto the flight line with anything that even looks like a gun is going to cause you some problems.

Of course, if you have your own plane, chances are you aren't at a big airport.  Chances are you are a few miles away at a GA field where there is NO security beyond a fence, and the worst thing you have to worry about is the fuel truck operator being late.


At the airport where I am (Albany NY) , where I've taken flight lessons, you use the same field as the big airlines and shipping companies, but all the private and chartered planes are boarded from a separate TSA free building. You walk outside to your plane.
It's a fairly large airport that hosts jumbo jets, and even Air Force One on occasion.
 
2013-05-28 04:14:01 PM

Kahabut: RobSeace: Kahabut: Joce678: Cewley: i'm thinking that if the tsa screenings are keeping people from doing bad shiat,

But they're not.

When was the last airliner hijacked?  When did the TSA start?

You were saying?

This is the same exact logic that proves the effectiveness of the tiger-repelling rock... Namely, faulty logic...

/Or, was that the joke?

I'd say it was halfway between.

I'm making fun of the op's logic, by using something equally spurious.

That being said, in all seriousness, there have been no hijackings since the TSA started... which is at least suggestive that they are doing something right, but certainly not conclusive, or even correlated.  In the real world, nothing is black and white.  The TSA might be stopping hijackings just by existing, despite their apparent lack of skill, acumen, or intelligence.  The fact is we don't actually know.  So it could be either way.  (and in either case, it's probably not worth it.)


The only single hijacking that originated in the United States for 2 decades prior to 9/11, was of a FedEx  plane, by a disgruntled employee.
 
2013-05-28 04:30:35 PM
Someone needs to explain to this girl where the vagina is because it seems damn near impossible for that screener to actually stuck her thumb up there. If anything, she may have made contact with her vulva but even still it's clear to me this is an unintended consequence of the screening process.

That being said, while I think this whole ordeal was done in an effort to intentionally bait TSA agents (and there was no fault on the part of the agent themselves) I find this whole circus act to be completely ridiculous and I hope it comes to an end at some point. The fact that I need to be felt up and damn near molested to board a plane these days is offensive and its high time we reconsidered the policies that put this in place from the beginning. For the record though, the TSA agents themselves are not the problem, it's the people passing laws who tell them to do this that are the problem. Baiting a TSA employee to showcase your rights violations is akin to convincing a police officer to shoot you so you can debate gun laws.
 
2013-05-28 04:46:32 PM

Kahabut: That being said, in all seriousness, there have been no hijackings since the TSA started... which is at least suggestive that they are doing something right, but certainly not conclusive, or even correlated.


How often, exactly, do you think planes were hijacked from the US in the 10, 20, 30, whatever, years before the TSA was formed?
 
2013-05-28 05:55:14 PM

Satanic_Hamster: Kahabut: That being said, in all seriousness, there have been no hijackings since the TSA started... which is at least suggestive that they are doing something right, but certainly not conclusive, or even correlated.

How often, exactly, do you think planes were hijacked from the US in the 10, 20, 30, whatever, years before the TSA was formed?


Did you even read the rest of the sentence or do not understand those words?
 
2013-05-28 06:09:56 PM

Profedius: When I read stories like this I think back to the time I had to go through a Chinese security check. I was pulled to a side room with four airport security officers inside two female and two male. I was made to strip completely nude and one of the female officers preformed the inspection without any protective gloves. This female officer took hold of my penis like a person would if they intended to masturbate me and she lifted it up down and to both sides with her other hand doing the same to my testicles. Giving that I have an extreme libido, her face close enough to feel her breath and she wasn't quick about it I became erect which in no why deterred her actions. When she completed her inspection she stood up and then proceeded to ask me a lot of questions as I stood there nude with an erection. Eventually the two male officers left the room when something came in on one of their radios and I was left with the two female officers. The reason I was told that the two females were present is, because they spoke English and I will stop the story there.


Like HELL you will, you sonofabiatch!  This is Fark, not your grandma's sewing circle!

Okay, you were nude, erect, and in a room with two extremely hot Chinese female security officers, one of whom had just released your penis.

WHAT.... HAPPENED... NEXT?
 
2013-05-28 06:22:30 PM

TommyymmoT: boyvoyeur: Infowars chick - "I want to fly under my rules, not yours."

TSA - "Do you have your own plane?"

Infowars chick - "No."

TSA - "Spread um"

That's why the whole thing makes no sense. If you have your own plane, or charter a plane, you aren't even in the same part of the airport as those clowns.

If it's your plane, either owned or rented, you can bring a shotgunon board if you want.


Yes; but fail to file a flight plan and, more and more, you run the risk of having the DHS meet you at the end of your flight with guns unholstered.  This is no joke.  This is no longer a free society - and that is the meat of this story.

/and yeah, fark that attention whore
 
2013-05-28 06:25:42 PM

Kahabut: Did you even read the rest of the sentence or do not understand those words?


So, again, how often do you think US based air craft here being hijacked?
 
2013-05-28 06:45:24 PM

Satanic_Hamster: Kahabut: Did you even read the rest of the sentence or do not understand those words?

So, again, how often do you think US based air craft here being hijacked?


In the world you live in, does something not happening yesterday make it impossible today?
 
2013-05-28 07:01:28 PM

Kahabut: In the world you live in, does something not happening yesterday make it impossible today?


So, again and again, how many sky jackings from US based flights do you think were happening?  Enough that they can be commended from stopping the wave of them?

Ten years, I started masturbating four times a day, every day.  Since then there hasn't been a single rape of a NFL football player on live television.  Under that logic, my jerking off is just as effective at its job as the TSA.
 
2013-05-28 09:23:20 PM

Into the blue again: eggrolls: vpb: Infowars.  So I'm going with "no".

I mega-loathe Infowars, too, but even a blind pig finds a truffle once in a while.

/The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

Wow, you are dumb. Seriously, you would choose Alex Jones and his flock of dodo birds? You need to take two steps!

/I have been against the TSA since its formation
//and the 'patriot' act
///slashies come in threes!


I put it in the same category as FDR working with Stalin to defeat Hitler.
 
2013-05-28 09:34:23 PM

Satanic_Hamster: Kahabut: In the world you live in, does something not happening yesterday make it impossible today?

So, again and again, how many sky jackings from US based flights do you think were happening?  Enough that they can be commended from stopping the wave of them?

Ten years, I started masturbating four times a day, every day.  Since then there hasn't been a single rape of a NFL football player on live television.  Under that logic, my jerking off is just as effective at its job as the TSA.


You've just demonstrated that you don't know what logic is.  You've previously demonstrated that you don't know what correlation or causation are.

In short, you aren't educated enough to have a meaningful conversation with.  Your inability to understand the point, the logic, and it's relationship to the subject at hand is making this not only fruitless but pointless.
 
2013-05-28 10:28:15 PM

CrazyCracka420: FloydA: Bathia_Mapes:
Exactly.

kiwimoogle84:
Yup. Labia, crotch, vulva, public region, yes. But if the TSA agent actually touched vag, that requires penetration.


I sometimes wonder if I was the only male who paid attention during that portion of sex ed class, while the rest of the boys just sat there, slack-jawed, staring at the pictures with a vague buzzing ringing in their ears.

Yes, you are a special little snowflake.


Yes, I am.  Sorry to hear that you don't know where the vagina is located.  Maybe some day, you will have sexual intercourse, and you'll learn these things.  It's all kinds of awesome, let me tell you.  Having sex with actual other people is great;  I wish you the best of luck!  I hope that you get a chance to do it some day.

Cheers!
 
2013-05-28 10:39:59 PM

sharphead: That is not a woman.... no woman calls it a vagina.  It's a trap.


I never heard them call it a trap either.

/Ba-zing
 
2013-05-28 10:50:03 PM

Kahabut: You've just demonstrated that you don't know what logic is. You've previously demonstrated that you don't know what correlation or causation are.

In short, you aren't educated enough to have a meaningful conversation with. Your inability to understand the point, the logic, and it's relationship to the subject at hand is making this not only fruitless but pointless.


And you're previously claimed that businesses should be able to refuse to serve to blacks.

I was just being sarcastic and poking fun at your moronic example and premise.
 
2013-05-29 12:16:36 AM

gibbon1: Maturin: I would suggest that we have two types of flights available; flights cleared by the TSA and, for the people to skittish to be patted down and terrorists, flights not cleared by the TSA.

Seriously though why not offer Americans an actual choice between flights with full screening and ones without any screening at all?


Maybe it is not about "screening", eh?
 
2013-05-29 12:19:31 AM

Barricaded Gunman: Profedius: When I read stories like this I think back to the time I had to go through a Chinese security check. I was pulled to a side room with four airport security officers inside two female and two male. I was made to strip completely nude and one of the female officers preformed the inspection without any protective gloves. This female officer took hold of my penis like a person would if they intended to masturbate me and she lifted it up down and to both sides with her other hand doing the same to my testicles. Giving that I have an extreme libido, her face close enough to feel her breath and she wasn't quick about it I became erect which in no why deterred her actions. When she completed her inspection she stood up and then proceeded to ask me a lot of questions as I stood there nude with an erection. Eventually the two male officers left the room when something came in on one of their radios and I was left with the two female officers. The reason I was told that the two females were present is, because they spoke English and I will stop the story there.

Like HELL you will, you sonofabiatch!  This is Fark, not your grandma's sewing circle!

Okay, you were nude, erect, and in a room with two extremely hot Chinese female security officers, one of whom had just released your penis.

WHAT.... HAPPENED... NEXT?


You can find the entire story in Penthouse Forum, issue #2,344,556.
"I never though this would happen to me,,,
 
2013-05-29 12:58:30 AM

Satanic_Hamster: Kahabut: You've just demonstrated that you don't know what logic is. You've previously demonstrated that you don't know what correlation or causation are.

In short, you aren't educated enough to have a meaningful conversation with. Your inability to understand the point, the logic, and it's relationship to the subject at hand is making this not only fruitless but pointless.

And you're previously claimed that businesses should be able to refuse to serve to blacks.

I was just being sarcastic and poking fun at your moronic example and premise.


"I was just kidding" is the last resort of the weak minded.  You can't even stick to your OWN point.
 
2013-05-29 11:08:10 AM

Kahabut: Satanic_Hamster: Kahabut: You've just demonstrated that you don't know what logic is. You've previously demonstrated that you don't know what correlation or causation are.

In short, you aren't educated enough to have a meaningful conversation with. Your inability to understand the point, the logic, and it's relationship to the subject at hand is making this not only fruitless but pointless.

And you're previously claimed that businesses should be able to refuse to serve to blacks.

I was just being sarcastic and poking fun at your moronic example and premise.

"I was just kidding" is the last resort of the weak minded.  You can't even stick to your OWN point.


Neither of you is sticking to any point.
 
Displayed 337 of 337 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report