Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Duplicate of another approved link: 7760234

(My Fox DC)   If you feel that our television channels are not already saturated with enough sex, vulgarity and profanity - you are correct. FARK: And the FCC agrees   ( divider line
    More: Interesting, Federal Communications Commission, Viewing, Bryan Fischer, profanity  
•       •       •

1119 clicks;  Favorite

Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2013-05-22 01:13:17 PM  
1 vote:
It won't matter to my kids, they are too busy downloading internet pr0n to care.
2013-05-22 10:28:35 AM  
1 vote:
I suggest a compromise: prior to 10 pm, TV is censored to the satisfaction of folks like the AFA and Helen Lovejoy. No nudity, no dirty language and no freaking murders or violence.

After 10 pm, no censorship. Porn, rated R movies, whatever. Everyone is happy. Helen Lovejoy can make her kids stop watching TV at 10 because she'd know there was nothing objectional on prior to that and the rest of us can watch our adult content without finding any strangers in the alps after 10.

/personally I'm for completely removing government from the process of censoring media but I'm also realistic enough to know that ain't happening
//have kids, they only watch what I let them watch, parent censorship good, government censorship bad
2013-05-22 10:26:58 AM  
1 vote:
Forget the kids. I get sick of every program having to push the envelope because "it's edgy."

Watched Survivor for exactly one episode this year. The word biatch was used every other word. Hell's Kitchen, the dialogue is exactly, "BEEP BEEP biatch ASS BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP biatch! YOU DON'T KNOW BEEEEEEP BEEP biatch.'

Oh well, I shouldn't be watching TV anyway, and neither should my kids.
2013-05-22 10:02:05 AM  
1 vote:
Most men don't look at nude women for the art's sake. Anyone who defends nudity so they can see Andy Sipowicz's naked ass is prurient and close to legally blind.

Just admit that you want to see naked chicks bounce across your big screen TV because you like giving your new brain a rest while the old brain stem takes over for a while. It's not about art; it's about boner. Or boner later.
2013-05-22 09:37:17 AM  
1 vote:
The biggest problem I see is that most people don't really care. They don't care if there's some dirty language and they don't care enough to give their opinion to the FCC.

But then there's that VERY small part of the population that gets their panties in a twist and they're the ones that take the time write in to the FCC and give their opinion. If only they spent as much time monitoring their kids' viewing activities as they did into biatching about it on the internet, they might not ever have to worry about their precious snowflakes accidentally seeing Janet Jackson's nipple.
Displayed 5 of 5 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter

Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.

In Other Media
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.