If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Fox News)   We are extremely diverse and want to include everybody, except white heterosexual males   (radio.foxnews.com) divider line 409
    More: Ironic, heterosexuals, minority religion, diversity, student government  
•       •       •

17883 clicks; posted to Main » on 18 May 2013 at 12:54 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



409 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-05-18 10:17:23 PM

WTFdoesitmatter: are admitting an inferiority that would put different racial groups at a disadvantage in these processes? Just wondering.


no, usually it's been "C: an unbalance exists in the system and a touch of re balancing via affirmative action like programs is necessary to restore an equal playing field."

unfortunately that has happened too much at this point and also people are acting out of 'A' right now because whites are out hip hop is cool even our president plays basketball and is black. kill whitey. pass that blunt.

what's not realized is that a lot of us whiteys are more: i didn't force you to pick cotton or rape your women. shiat, i was at the same reggae concert as you last week. i hate oppressive rich white shiatheads as much as you do.
 
2013-05-18 10:30:52 PM

WhippingBoy: Mock26: I am not a racist.  I hate everyone equally.

So you're Scottish?


The only race worth hating is the human one.

Those motherfarkers got it coming.
 
2013-05-18 10:35:16 PM

muck4doo: Oh wait, i did learn something. Son graduated from Baylor today,


baylor? really? so you're a rich whitey.

i hate you and your son.

unless he's into weed and reggae.
 
2013-05-18 10:53:08 PM

utah dude: muck4doo: Oh wait, i did learn something. Son graduated from Baylor today,

baylor? really? so you're a rich whitey.

i hate you and your son.

unless he's into weed and reggae.


He's into packing his stuff right now.
 
2013-05-18 11:35:48 PM

bunner: fugeeface:
[inspirationboost.com image 534x400]

Me too, Doc.



Farkin' dreamers. Buncha shiftless layabouts.

They never amount to nuthin.
 
2013-05-18 11:37:35 PM
FTFA: "...previously served as a member of the Northwestern Inclusion Task Force."

Are you farking kidding me?  A farking Inclusion Task Force?  Does this mean I should be on the lookout for "the war on not being included"?
 
2013-05-18 11:59:48 PM

Vectron: Duke_leto_Atredes: Point of order, white males do not need special laws to protect us. We who have raped and pillaged across the world throughout time....

It's been a messy past but whites (and I include women in partnership with men) have created a culture fit for our people with laws and technology and arts that can't be touched by anyone else.
Sub-Saharan Africans had not invented the wheel at the time they were brought over for slavery (And please don't state that the populist but ridiculous theories of Jared Diamond are fact).
Try not taking for granted that European civilization "just happened" to white people. This has to be said once in awhile.
Every people has something to be proud of but I prefer living in my culture.


I know you's trolling, but...
Ever stop to think (I'm stretching here) for a minute that whatever people choose to invent... happens to be what they need?
Take the peoples of the Americas... Mayans, Incas, those folks... what didn't they have wheels? I'll tell ya why... because they would have been no f*cking good in the mountains.
The people of sub saharan Africa and the great plains of north america? Because they didn't have a lot of sh*t to carry.
The peoples of the world who used the wheel (Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, Asians etc) had three things: lots of sh*t to move, permanent cities and towns to move to and from, and relatively flat ground to build roads or rut paths. Nomadic peoples without many possessions and people who live on the sides of mountains don't care about any of this stuff. Why would they need wheels?

One could ask the same question "why haven't you invented a nuclear weapon?" Because you don't f*cking need it, that's why. European civilization did "just happen" to white people. That civilization was shaped by their environment, as all civilizations are. The inventions they made are a direct result of the cold, wet, crowded places they lived in, and the permanent settlements they created. Europeans were and are a warlike people. Maps of europe and the world bear this out. As such, much of their technical achievement was used for the purpose of killing other europeans (at first) and taking their stuff, and they were good at it. When they rampaged throughout the rest of the world, this tech made them a formidable foe.

Or is it you just want to dip into your bag-o-racism to try and justify why certain peoples are allegedly "less intelligent" than others?
 
2013-05-19 12:06:56 AM

WTFdoesitmatter: Just wondering.


Figures that you'd be wondering since you quite obviously couldn't recognize history if it kicked you square in your dumb ass.
Being a white male still puts you at the top of the heap in this country and in this world. You'll pardon me for not shedding a tear over this little pissant not getting appointed to some college group. I'm sure he'll do just fine compared to his classmates of color.

And if you'll read the thread, you'll see that most of the other white people here know that they have that advantage, and aren't sobbing into their beer either. Just little crybabies like you who get their diapers in a know because they can't have everything they want, just 99% or everything.

Welcome to the rest of the non-white, non-male world.
 
2013-05-19 12:08:08 AM
"Just little crybabies like you who get their diapers in a knot because they can't have everything they want, just 99% of everything.

/FTFM
//hate spelling mistakes
 
2013-05-19 12:13:28 AM
Bonobo62:
So there were no white people active in the civil rights movement?

They were vastly outnumbered by the white people who wanted to kill them and bury them in dams. Especially if they were Jewish.
So... what was the point again?
 
2013-05-19 12:15:38 AM

Nabb1: "Diversity" is like Orwell's  Animal Farm: some are more equal than others.


Really? You went with this one?
 
2013-05-19 12:20:08 AM

utah dude: rewind2846: Now... just STFU. You have no case. You have gone much too long with having the field all to yourselves, and now that this is no longer the case you want to cry about it. Here's a tissue, and that's all you get.

uh it's not that we've got competition from darkies, bro, it's that those darkies are handed the job w/o respect to merit. it's no longer competition at all. being the best and some incompetent darky gets the job anyway. it ends up hurting the company that hired him, too, because incompetence.


And THIS is where the racism comes in. The assumption is that the person of color is, by default, incompetent because of the color of their skin.

As if there aren't incompetent white males a-plenty in this world.

A logical reason might be that out of the qualified and competent candidates, they picked the person of color for whatever reason... but then logic isn't the racist's strong suit, now is it?
 
2013-05-19 12:28:48 AM

rewind2846: Vectron: Duke_leto_Atredes: Point of order, white males do not need special laws to protect us. We who have raped and pillaged across the world throughout time....

It's been a messy past but whites (and I include women in partnership with men) have created a culture fit for our people with laws and technology and arts that can't be touched by anyone else.
Sub-Saharan Africans had not invented the wheel at the time they were brought over for slavery (And please don't state that the populist but ridiculous theories of Jared Diamond are fact).
Try not taking for granted that European civilization "just happened" to white people. This has to be said once in awhile.
Every people has something to be proud of but I prefer living in my culture.

I know you's trolling, but...
Ever stop to think (I'm stretching here) for a minute that whatever people choose to invent... happens to be what they need?
Take the peoples of the Americas... Mayans, Incas, those folks... what didn't they have wheels? I'll tell ya why... because they would have been no f*cking good in the mountains.
The people of sub saharan Africa and the great plains of north america? Because they didn't have a lot of sh*t to carry.
The peoples of the world who used the wheel (Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, Asians etc) had three things: lots of sh*t to move, permanent cities and towns to move to and from, and relatively flat ground to build roads or rut paths. Nomadic peoples without many possessions and people who live on the sides of mountains don't care about any of this stuff. Why would they need wheels?

One could ask the same question "why haven't you invented a nuclear weapon?" Because you don't f*cking need it, that's why. European civilization did "just happen" to white people. That civilization was shaped by their environment, as all civilizations are. The inventions they made are a direct result of the cold, wet, crowded places they lived in, and the permanent settlements they created. Europeans were and ar ...


I wasn't trolling and what you laid down in this thread is the biggest, steamiest heap of BS I've seen in a while.
Your "theory" is just that, a theory. More like a bedtime story for the weak minded. I think  this claptrap stems from the populist writer, Jared Diamond who is as much a fan of white people as Tim Wise. Like Stephen Jay Gould and Sigmund Freud, his work will be debunked in the coming decades (get on the right side of history, Rewind)

The Chinese have a marvelous history with many technological inventions. Who else compares with them and European people? Observe the world around you. I'm not saying other races are devoid of worth and humanity. Nothing could be further from the truth but let's stop with this nonsense that white people don't deserve credit for their accomplishments. Pretty much everything in the world around you is because of the invention, commerce, hard work, ingenuity and talents of white people. This should be taught in colleges!

Following the Richwine scandal this was written in the Scientific American:

Should Research on Race and IQ Be Banned?

I found the comments section the most interesting part. It is comforting to know that so many in the science fields reject the popular "diversity uber alles" religion of today. How backward and scared our society is.
 
2013-05-19 12:36:17 AM

WhippingBoy: Mock26: I am not a racist.  I hate everyone equally.

So you're Scottish?


Only when I wear a kilt.
 
2013-05-19 12:43:53 AM

rewind2846: One could ask the same question "why haven't you invented a nuclear weapon?" Because you don't f*cking need it, that's why. European civilization did "just happen" to white people. That civilization was shaped by their environment, as all civilizations are. The inventions they made are a direct result of the cold, wet, crowded places they lived in, and the permanent settlements they created. Europeans were and are a warlike people. Maps of europe and the world bear this out. As such, much of their technical achievement was used for the purpose of killing other europeans (at first) and taking their stuff, and they were good at it. When they rampaged throughout the rest of the world, this tech made them a formidable foe.

Or is it you just want to dip into your bag-o-racism to try and justify why certain peoples are allegedly "less intelligent" than others?


The Fleshlight blows your whole argument out of the water.
 
2013-05-19 12:49:45 AM
Here are some comments to that Scientific American essay I linked to above:


"Assuming Darwin was right, and that genetics is a real science, there will in fact be significant differences in personality, psychology, temperament, and cognitive ability between various human populations.
Unless all of modern science is false, it is theoretically impossible for all psychological traits and mental abilities to be distributed uniformly throughout all populations worldwide.
All scientists on earth without exception have known this for more than a century.
These issues should be studied intensively, scientifically, without apology, and discussed openly, without stigma, hysteria, or censorship.
Anything else is fascism, totalitarianism, antiscience.....The fact that Scientific American has published this perverted nonsense means that we are making the transition from the soft fascism of political correctness to something more overtly fascist."

-------------------------------------------------

"The Catholic church tried in vain to suppress/control scientific research. How long can the currently reigning belief system do it? Eventually, the truth - The REAL truth that most people already know, will be fully confirmed."

---------------------------------------------------

"It is not lost on some of us that this is essentially the same argument creationists use. They accept an ideological viewpoint and refuse to consider any evidence to the contrary. ...The difference is that they simply believe in a different ideological God(literal God, literal race equality). Saying that we should subject the scientific truth to an ideology is repugnant to many scientifically-minded people, and hopefully they will resist such ideas. Even if they don't investigate it here, it will likely be investigated elsewhere in the world, in countries like China and Japan. It is also likely that with continuing advances in genetics and neurobiology it will be impossible to overlook. We already know that blacks have significantly higher testosterone levels than whites, thanks to research on kidney cancer."

------------------------------------------------------------

"Should Research on Race and IQ Be Banned?"

No, research into any and all topics should always be permitted. If you don't agree, then you are an enemy of Western civilization, as well as of yours truly.

------------------------------------------------------------

"The notion that geographically isolated populations ( or socioculturally, etc.) of the same species may evolve variations in average physical or intellectual aptitudes is consistent with evolutionary theory. Furthermore, the notion that such intellectual variations may exist is certainly a falsifiable proposition and a appropriate subject for scientific examination. Political ideology should not dictate the course of scientific inquiry."

-----------------------------------------------------------

".....Unfortunately, sound unbiased research in this field is scant... while predispositions and "political correctness" are rampant.
Genetics and there nexus with the environment (epigenetics) are absolutely foundational and cannot be underestimated as fundamental determinants of all animal development both as a specie and individuals striving to survive and thrive.
The list of human genetic-based and genetic-influenced diseases is staggering. Genetic and proteonomics includes all alternations and manifestations of our biochemistry/physiology... our neurochemistry/behaviors."

------------------------------------------------------------

"John Hogan is spouting unadulterated nonsense. Minnesota reared-apart, monozygotic twins studies, in addition to numerous other studies and data bases overwhelming prove that the major contributor to IQ is genetics, no matter how politically incorrect it is to state that fact. If Scientific American considers political correctness to be more important than science, I will have to cancel my subscription. "

----------------------------------------------------------

What side of history do you want to be on?
 
2013-05-19 01:04:47 AM

Vectron: The Chinese have a marvelous history with many technological inventions. Who else compares with them and European people? Observe the world around you. I'm not saying other races are devoid of worth and humanity. Nothing could be further from the truth but let's stop with this nonsense that white people don't deserve credit for their accomplishments. Pretty much everything in the world around you is because of the invention, commerce, hard work, ingenuity and talents of white people. This should be taught in colleges!


And this is where the failure comes into full bloom, and exposes the person who posted it for what they really are.
The problem with your train of thought (!) is that you constantly (and incorrectly) seek to equate "intelligence" with "what they invented". I could easily take a european person living in the 20th century, place them in the middle of a south american rain forest with nothing but a knife and the the clothes on their backs, and I guarantee they will be eaten within two days. If not, they will starve in less than two weeks.
Meanwhile there are peoples there whom you might call "primitive" who do just fine in that environment, and have for generations.  Are they less intelligent than the european? If so, why is the white guy now part of the food chain for local predators while the locals find what's left of him a week later? The answer is simple... the locals invented what they needed to get food and stay safe, and the white guy didn't.

Inventions have nothing to do with intelligence as an absolute measure (a measure which must, if to be believed, take into account the whole of humankind and not use a eurocentric bias), but are a result of the environment in which the invention was created. People make what they need.
You want to believe that other stormfront bullsh*t instead, be my guest.

BTW, "political correctness" is white male code for "why can't I call them ni**ers anymore?"
Substitute any non-male, non white, non straight slur as needed... interesting coincidence that it was white men who thought most of them up.
 
2013-05-19 01:08:57 AM
Well coming from that pillar of honesty Faux News. I'm sure its 100% true
 
2013-05-19 01:10:23 AM
"I could easily take a European person living in the 21st century..."
/FTFM
//damned autocorrect
 
2013-05-19 01:24:03 AM

rewind2846: Vectron: The Chinese have a marvelous history with many technological inventions. Who else compares with them and European people? Observe the world around you. I'm not saying other races are devoid of worth and humanity. Nothing could be further from the truth but let's stop with this nonsense that white people don't deserve credit for their accomplishments. Pretty much everything in the world around you is because of the invention, commerce, hard work, ingenuity and talents of white people. This should be taught in colleges!

And this is where the failure comes into full bloom, and exposes the person who posted it for what they really are.
The problem with your train of thought (!) is that you constantly (and incorrectly) seek to equate "intelligence" with "what they invented". I could easily take a european person living in the 20th century, place them in the middle of a south american rain forest with nothing but a knife and the the clothes on their backs, and I guarantee they will be eaten within two days. If not, they will starve in less than two weeks.
Meanwhile there are peoples there whom you might call "primitive" who do just fine in that environment, and have for generations.  Are they less intelligent than the european? If so, why is the white guy now part of the food chain for local predators while the locals find what's left of him a week later? The answer is simple... the locals invented what they needed to get food and stay safe, and the white guy didn't.

Inventions have nothing to do with intelligence as an absolute measure (a measure which must, if to be believed, take into account the whole of humankind and not use a eurocentric bias), but are a result of the environment in which the invention was created. People make what they need.
You want to believe that other stormfront bullsh*t instead, be my guest.

BTW, "political correctness" is white male code for "why can't I call them ni**ers anymore?"
Substitute any non-male, non white, non straight ...


We get it, man. White people are the devil, and that justifies your hatred of them.
 
2013-05-19 01:31:11 AM
rewind2846:  People make what they need.

Do you see that the basis of your argument is an opinion? Sorry, but that doesn't stand any sort of examination.
Think of all those lone white men working in their workshops late at night in the nineteenth century that gave us marvels for the twentieth century. It wasn't about need. It was about curiosity and other things.

Meanwhile in sub Saharan Africa, it has always been starvation and crisis. A sub continent wealthy in natural resources and fertility had to wait for white people make order for the Africans. Look what white people did with south Africa and Rhodesia. Kick YT out and those countries are descending back into the abyss.

"Inventions have nothing to do with intelligence as an absolute measure"

Let me say this Rewind, I don't believe the ability to invent determines a person worth. Some people have other talents. Some people are compassionate, Some raise families well. Some are trustworthy. All of this is of value.
 
2013-05-19 02:02:27 AM
"ASG president Ani Ajith refused to answer questions about the matter. When asked by Fox News if he agreed with Coley's remarks, Ajith hung up his phone."

And prosecution rests.
 
2013-05-19 02:03:10 AM
This of course happens ALL-OF-THE-TIME.   20+years ago I was in the running for an HR job at a large land-grant institution, a state university.  I successfully made it through two rounds of interviews, and then came before the PooBah of HR for the entire system.  He looked over my resume, said he was very impressed, then looked me directly in the eye and said, "You do realize that you are a white male?  And we are a state institution?"

I wasn't sure whether to be shocked or simply admire his candor.

A black woman got the job.  She may have been more qualified, I don't know.
 
2013-05-19 02:31:20 AM

Wulfman: This is a position that should be reserved for a person of color.  A person of no color shouldn't be applying for it.


/learning the lingo


Why is 'person of color' satisfactory but 'coloured person' is racist? And who decides these things?

/stopped bothering trying to learn the lingo as it will just change in a few years anyway
 
2013-05-19 02:47:29 AM

Bonobo62: We get it, man. White people are the devil, and that justifies your hatred of them.


No, I don't. Only those who choose to see those unlike themselves as less than equal in intelligence, worth and value than themselves simply due to an external variance in appearance.
Also, those who refuse to see how the history of this nation and the world impacts today, and how their ancestors (and in some cases, they themselves) still perpetuate that history.

As Lyndon Johnson said so eloquently in 1965, "You do not wipe away the scars of centuries by saying: 'now, you are free to go where you want, do as you desire, and choose the leaders you please.' You do not take a man who for years has been hobbled by chains, liberate him, bring him to the starting line of a race, saying, 'you are free to compete with all the others,' and still justly believe you have been completely fair . . . This is the next and more profound stage of the battle for civil rights. We seek not just freedom but opportunity-not just legal equity but human ability-not just equality as a right and a theory, but equality as a fact and as a result."

For an good example of who I don't mean, look through this thread. Quite a number of white people are thoroughly nonplussed at the plight or the poor little pissant who didn't get picked for the diversity program, because they realize that he, and they, will do just fine.

They realize that as white people, and especially white males, they are already at the head of the line compared to others and always have been... and acknowledge that they have it pretty good. The ones who piss and moan and whine like spoiled children are those who probably have never been told that they can't have anything they want, and can't even fire up enough brain cells to realize how fortunate they are in this society. Women and minorities have always had to deal with this, and now with each generation the changes being made scare the sh*t out of the whining white men.

Most white people fall into the first category, and only a tiny (but loud) percentage are in the second... but I would imagine they are an embarrassment to all. Go back and read the thread if you want proof. "White people" aren't the devil, racist white people are.
 
2013-05-19 02:52:45 AM

Mambo Bananapatch: Wulfman: This is a position that should be reserved for a person of color.  A person of no color shouldn't be applying for it.


/learning the lingo

Why is 'person of color' satisfactory but 'coloured person' is racist? And who decides these things?

/stopped bothering trying to learn the lingo as it will just change in a few years anyway


The person whom you are addressing. If I were a woman I determine whether you address me as Mrs or Ms or just by my last name. As a man in a professional setting use Mr., if you know me as a co-worker or peer my last name will do, and if you know me personally use my first name. My preference. Whatever you want to be called is your choice as well. Simple, and not a difficult concept.
 
2013-05-19 04:15:01 AM

Mock26: I am not a racist.  I hate everyone equally.


Ah, but do you hate everyone equally in exactly the same way?  Otherwise, you're a racist.
 
2013-05-19 05:10:50 AM

super_grass: utah dude: cameroncrazy1984: Oh yeah clearly you do.

iranian wife, mexican son... uh numerous pro-gay rallies and such (despite the whole church prop 8 thing), so yah.

if i miss out on another job opportunity because of race i'll prolly call the interviewing person whatever racist moniker is deserved. because i'm human too.

A white person.

You see, being white is like having the original sin. You are tainted by the crimes of your ancestors the second you are born regardless of your actions and character in life, and all white people are born with it. The only way to seek salvation from this burden is to relinquish time, opportunity, and money to institutions whose job it is to scrub this terrible condition from you while admonishing you as an wicked human being.

The more time and money you give to these people, the more they will cleanse your soul of this evil. However, as one of the wicked, you are not allowed to join the upper ranks or bring up your own suggestions on how we should interpret their doctrine unless you are of a more righteous bloodline.

But be warned. Do not ever disagree with these people, for they have the support of powerful people and legions of supporters who can turn you into an outcast for speaking against their ideology.


You see, being black is like having original sin. You are tainted by the crimes of those in lower income neighborhoods around you the second you are born regardless of your actions and character in life and all black people are born with it. The only way to seek salvation from this burden is to....well  you really can't. It doesn't matter how "proper" speak or how many white people tell you "well not like you" or "no offense, but...." You will be pre-judged eventually. You will suffer a moment of discrimination.  All you can hope is that it doesn't happen to often................etc.
/you have such an awesome username. I have to admit I'm a bit disappointed in your world view.
 
2013-05-19 05:13:58 AM

MagSeven: super_grass: utah dude: cameroncrazy1984: Oh yeah clearly you do.

iranian wife, mexican son... uh numerous pro-gay rallies and such (despite the whole church prop 8 thing), so yah.

if i miss out on another job opportunity because of race i'll prolly call the interviewing person whatever racist moniker is deserved. because i'm human too.

A white person.

You see, being white is like having the original sin. You are tainted by the crimes of your ancestors the second you are born regardless of your actions and character in life, and all white people are born with it. The only way to seek salvation from this burden is to relinquish time, opportunity, and money to institutions whose job it is to scrub this terrible condition from you while admonishing you as an wicked human being.

The more time and money you give to these people, the more they will cleanse your soul of this evil. However, as one of the wicked, you are not allowed to join the upper ranks or bring up your own suggestions on how we should interpret their doctrine unless you are of a more righteous bloodline.

But be warned. Do not ever disagree with these people, for they have the support of powerful people and legions of supporters who can turn you into an outcast for speaking against their ideology.

You see, being black is like having original sin. You are tainted by the crimes of those in lower income neighborhoods around you the second you are born regardless of your actions and character in life and all black people are born with it. The only way to seek salvation from this burden is to....well  you really can't. It doesn't matter how "proper" speak or how many white people tell you "well not like you" or "no offense, but...." You will be pre-judged eventually. You will suffer a moment of discrimination.  All you can hope is that it doesn't happen to often................etc.
/you have such an awesome username. I have to admit I'm a bit disappointed in your world view.


Hmm. On second read through, I think you were kidding. Sorry!
 
2013-05-19 06:08:54 AM
Something new i learned on fark. If you stick your peener somewhere, that makes you not racist. Interesting.
 
2013-05-19 06:20:31 AM
I can vouch for the Biscuits at Red Lobster. They are not interesting.
 
2013-05-19 07:55:45 AM
Maybe they could have simply stated that they chose the most-qualified person for the position and kept the race and sexual bias crap to themselves.
 
2013-05-19 08:27:40 AM

NutWrench: "This university is not ready, in any capacity, for a heterosexual white male to be in charge in any way of diversity and inclusion," said Ian Coley, a member of the diversity committee. "I don't know if any university is."

[bbsimg.ngfiles.com image 330x282]


I too saw the irony in that statement when I first read it.
 
2013-05-19 11:04:53 AM

Green Scorpio: NutWrench: "This university is not ready, in any capacity, for a heterosexual white male to be in charge in any way of diversity and inclusion," said Ian Coley, a member of the diversity committee. "I don't know if any university is."

[bbsimg.ngfiles.com image 330x282]

I too saw the irony in that statement when I first read it.


But they're still crawling from the wreckage of oppression!  See?  they probably have pics of it on their iPhone in the glove compartment of the car their daddy bought them.  Oppression!  The memories, so vivid!  Whiny children.  How do they work?
 
2013-05-19 11:34:52 AM

utah dude: WTFdoesitmatter: are admitting an inferiority that would put different racial groups at a disadvantage in these processes? Just wondering.

no, usually it's been "C: an unbalance exists in the system and a touch of re balancing via affirmative action like programs is necessary to restore an equal playing field."

unfortunately that has happened too much at this point and also people are acting out of 'A' right now because whites are out hip hop is cool even our president plays basketball and is black. kill whitey. pass that blunt.

what's not realized is that a lot of us whiteys are more: i didn't force you to pick cotton or rape your women. shiat, i was at the same reggae concert as you last week. i hate oppressive rich white shiatheads as much as you do.


Are you out of your phooking mind?
If the players are equal why would all but one group be given a little unearned credit?
The whole concept of racial quotas and preferential hiring, and promotion, and being "socially advanced" in classes at university where no homework is turned in or needed, test results are another thing that doesn't seem to matter, as long as you didn't happen to be a white male, and (horrors) heterosexual.
Since everybody...well, not everybody, but several people have felt they needed to establish a personal sexual identity to properly address the matter at hand, and in so doing, even bi lib folks come off a bit, well, puritanical.
If you already know what you like...I guess you can say I'm this kinda sexual or that kind of sexual, but damn, there are just so damned many choices, and we only live so long...believe me, I'm nearing my "best if used by" date, and I still don't know what all I don't like. A personal hero, Mae West once said "When faced with having to choose between two evils, I usually go with the one I hadn't tried yet."
As far as the guy being a white male hetro snake handler, well, lets face it, them monosyllabic mouth-breathing mono-browed mutants from over at mud flats probably get a bunch of "White Privilege", discount on mud tires, confederate battle flags, teeveee dinners and them little pine trees ya hang of'n the rear view mirror, or for a festive look you can hang six or eight off yer rifle rack! One word P-A-N-T-Y B-A-N-D-I-T, w8...2 wurdz.
Anyway see some not diverse snake handlers at:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlUhftHl_f0
Yup them ppls gots zillionz o bux, just frum bein whyte!
It's all just theater, there is a turning of the screw, a subtle undercurrent in urban life today.
Somebody said light it.
Remember Florence and Normandy, yeah that, now think all over the place. I know what my Asian cousins did, five bux says when it's going good it'll be a good time to settle accounts.
Anyway, none of the chicks at the school looked very hot at all, couple of ratty dudes, nah, just pull funding and don't hire certain applicoonts.
When the welfare checks don't cash, the cities burn....
I don't think diversity will be an issue when the dust settles.
Sexual preferences? A much more important non-issue but how does one decide????
And PHOOKUM if they can't take a joke.
 
2013-05-19 11:41:36 AM
If the position was black and asian lesbian student representative for example I can totally see why he would not be even considered being a white heterosexual male. The post is diversity which means anybody could do it as long as they promote diversity (however you do THAT)
 
2013-05-19 11:49:56 AM

Thai_Mai_Xhu: Are you out of your phooking mind?
If the players are equal why would all but one group be given a little unearned credit?
The whole concept of racial quotas and preferential hiring, and promotion, and being "socially advanced" in classes at university where no homework is turned in or needed, test results are another thing that doesn't seem to matter, as long as you didn't happen to be a white male, and (horrors) heterosexual.
Since everybody...well, not everybody, but several people have felt they needed to establish a personal sexual identity to properly address the matter at hand, and in so doing, even bi lib folks come off a bit, well, puritanical.
If you already know what you like...I guess you can say I'm this kinda sexual or that kind of sexual, but damn, there are just so damned many choices, and we only live so long...believe me, I'm nearing my "best if used by" date, and I still don't know what all I don't like. A personal hero, Mae West once said "When faced with having to choose between two evils, I usually go with the one I hadn't tried yet."
As far as the guy being a white male hetro snake handler, well, lets face it, them monosyllabic mouth-breathing mono-browed mutants from over at mud flats probably get a bunch of "White Privilege", discount on mud tires, confederate battle flags, teeveee dinners and them little pine trees ya hang of'n the rear view mirror, or for a festive look you can hang six or eight off yer rifle rack! One word P-A-N-T-Y B-A-N-D-I-T, w8...2 wurdz.
Anyway see some not diverse snake handlers at:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlUhftHl_f0
Yup them ppls gots zillionz o bux, just frum bein whyte!
It's all just theater, there is a turning of the screw, a subtle undercurrent in urban life today.
Somebody said light it.
Remember Florence and Normandy, yeah that, now think all over the place. I know what my Asian cousins did, five bux says when it's going good it'll be a good time to settle accounts.
Anyway, none of the chicks at the ...


i'm coming back to read this in 20 minutes after my amphetamines have soaked in. then, only then, will it make sense.
 
2013-05-19 12:27:34 PM

utah dude: Thai_Mai_Xhu: Are you out of your phooking mind?
If the players are equal why would all but one group be given a little unearned credit?
The whole concept of racial quotas and preferential hiring, and promotion, and being "socially advanced" in classes at university where no homework is turned in or needed, test results are another thing that doesn't seem to matter, as long as you didn't happen to be a white male, and (horrors) heterosexual.
Since everybody...well, not everybody, but several people have felt they needed to establish a personal sexual identity to properly address the matter at hand, and in so doing, even bi lib folks come off a bit, well, puritanical.
If you already know what you like...I guess you can say I'm this kinda sexual or that kind of sexual, but damn, there are just so damned many choices, and we only live so long...believe me, I'm nearing my "best if used by" date, and I still don't know what all I don't like. A personal hero, Mae West once said "When faced with having to choose between two evils, I usually go with the one I hadn't tried yet."
As far as the guy being a white male hetro snake handler, well, lets face it, them monosyllabic mouth-breathing mono-browed mutants from over at mud flats probably get a bunch of "White Privilege", discount on mud tires, confederate battle flags, teeveee dinners and them little pine trees ya hang of'n the rear view mirror, or for a festive look you can hang six or eight off yer rifle rack! One word P-A-N-T-Y B-A-N-D-I-T, w8...2 wurdz.
Anyway see some not diverse snake handlers at:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlUhftHl_f0
Yup them ppls gots zillionz o bux, just frum bein whyte!
It's all just theater, there is a turning of the screw, a subtle undercurrent in urban life today.
Somebody said light it.
Remember Florence and Normandy, yeah that, now think all over the place. I know what my Asian cousins did, five bux says when it's going good it'll be a good time to settle accounts.
Anyway, none of the ...


i got phat trolled by a juggalo. that's awesome.

If the players are equal why would all but one group be given a little unearned credit?

don't go all watson racist on me. the quotas are from a reparations standpoint. and they're old, need to be stopped at this point. and yeah, usually when AA is dropped on a situation the person they hired is way incompetent. otherwise they'd be hired straight off. it's OVERCOMPENSATING. please find me a competent candidate for the job in any skincolor. i'll hire them cuz they're the best.

oh i watched the video, now high enough to get it. i need a faygo and to touch up my makeup. damn.
 
2013-05-19 12:27:54 PM
I'm sorry, but I find this thread racist, sexist, demeaning and oppressive and I demand a senate subcommittee close this website.
 
2013-05-19 12:35:09 PM

bunner: I'm sorry, but I find this thread racist, sexist, demeaning and oppressive and I demand a senate subcommittee close this website.


sorry, no new subcommittees because sequestration. see, how the republican filibusters are perpetuating their racism!!!
 
2013-05-19 01:00:38 PM

utah dude: bunner: I'm sorry, but I find this thread racist, sexist, demeaning and oppressive and I demand a senate subcommittee close this website.

sorry, no new subcommittees because sequestration. see, how the republican filibusters are perpetuating their racism!!!


memestorage.com
 
2013-05-19 01:27:33 PM

dready zim: If the position was black and asian lesbian student representative for example I can totally see why he would not be even considered being a white heterosexual male. The post is diversity which means anybody could do it as long as they promote diversity (however you do THAT)


Judging from the articles, it's a non-job. Stuff like this usually is. The person hired doesn't actually promote diversity, the university simply gives the appearance of diversity by putting one more non-white person in a made-up and useless position.
 
2013-05-19 01:52:04 PM

Bonobo62: Judging from the articles, it's a non-job. Stuff like this usually is. The person hired doesn't actually promote diversity, the university simply gives the appearance of diversity by putting one more non-white person in a made-up and useless position.


how many hours and posts did it take to get here?

would somebody please +o Bonobo62 ? maybe +TF at the same time?
 
2013-05-19 01:53:28 PM

bunner: utah dude: bunner: I'm sorry, but I find this thread racist, sexist, demeaning and oppressive and I demand a senate subcommittee close this website.

sorry, no new subcommittees because sequestration. see, how the republican filibusters are perpetuating their racism!!!

[memestorage.com image 338x506]


best viewed while listening to Propagandhi ! i like it. (also, i hate the antisemitic version.)
 
2013-05-19 02:13:56 PM

utah dude: Bonobo62: Judging from the articles, it's a non-job. Stuff like this usually is. The person hired doesn't actually promote diversity, the university simply gives the appearance of diversity by putting one more non-white person in a made-up and useless position.

how many hours and posts did it take to get here?

would somebody please +o Bonobo62 ? maybe +TF at the same time?


BUT IT'S REAL TO ME!
 
2013-05-19 02:16:41 PM

rewind2846: Mambo Bananapatch: Wulfman: This is a position that should be reserved for a person of color.  A person of no color shouldn't be applying for it.


/learning the lingo

Why is 'person of color' satisfactory but 'coloured person' is racist? And who decides these things?

/stopped bothering trying to learn the lingo as it will just change in a few years anyway

The person whom you are addressing. If I were a woman I determine whether you address me as Mrs or Ms or just by my last name. As a man in a professional setting use Mr., if you know me as a co-worker or peer my last name will do, and if you know me personally use my first name. My preference. Whatever you want to be called is your choice as well. Simple, and not a difficult concept.


Not difficult at all, as long as you wear a label around your neck announcing your preference. Otherwise I have to guess, or start every introduction with, "Are you coloured, a colored person, Negro, African-Canadian, or how about I just call you by your name?"
 
2013-05-19 02:28:49 PM

Mambo Bananapatch: Not difficult at all, as long as you wear a label around your neck announcing your preference. Otherwise I have to guess, or start every introduction with, "Are you coloured, a colored person, Negro, African-Canadian, or how about I just call you by your name?"


This came to mind...

assets.adamriff.com
 
2013-05-19 02:39:47 PM

cameroncrazy1984: Mock26: cameroncrazy1984: Mock26: cameroncrazy1984: Nabb1: Why not? Aren't you pre-judging this person based on skin color and sexual orientation?

No, I'm pre-judging the person based on what he says are his qualifications. What about being a white, heterosexual male with a lesbian sister is a qualification for being president of a diversity group? Does he have prior experience in such groups? Does he have prior leadership experience?

You do realize that if you exclude someone from a leadership position because he is white and heterosexual that you really do not understand the definition of "diverse," right?

Yes. However, there is no evidence that this was the case here.

And there is no evidence that it was not the case.

Oh so by all means let's just assume that it was the case, then?


From the article: "This university is not ready, in any capacity, for a heterosexual white male to be in charge in any way of diversity and inclusion," said Ian Coley, a member of the diversity committee. "I don't know if any university is."

So, yeah, the Diversity Counsel really does not understand the meaning of the word "diverse."
 
2013-05-19 02:40:01 PM
Could somebody essplain why all of these multi-factional, fragmented, oppressed types desperately need the assistance, approval, endless positive reinforcement  and unwavering and unquestioning respect of the very people they say are oppressing them?
 
2013-05-19 03:17:32 PM

bunner: Could somebody essplain why all of these multi-factional, fragmented, oppressed types desperately need the assistance, approval, endless positive reinforcement  and unwavering and unquestioning respect of the very people they say are oppressing them?


Because if they were taught the value of self-sufficiency and independence, the people that manipulate them would lose their control.
 
Displayed 50 of 409 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report