If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Comet Net)   Brits still looking for lost Beagle, have even placed a lost ad in the supermarket circular   (thecomet.net) divider line 46
    More: Followup  
•       •       •

3351 clicks; posted to Main » on 01 Jan 2004 at 10:39 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



46 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread
 
2004-01-01 09:41:30 AM
Florence ate it.
 
2004-01-01 10:41:40 AM
Dontcha think they're getting a little "Baghdad Bob" about this whole thing? The second I heard, the first time, that they were having problems locating it... I knew it was gone...

I mean... its friggin Mars!
 
2004-01-01 10:41:43 AM
I knew it. The terrorists have won.
 
2004-01-01 10:43:46 AM
But that article has a great headline - not the Fark headline, the real one.

gotta love jack higgins
 
2004-01-01 10:45:00 AM
I think Charlie Brown took it and out it to sleep.
 
2004-01-01 10:46:18 AM
Every good dog person knows that, when let off the leash, Beagles wander off for months. Don't worry, he'll come back when he gets hungry.
 
2004-01-01 10:46:30 AM
 
2004-01-01 10:47:56 AM
If this was a story about a NASA probe then it would already be a flamewar about the budget not being used for useful stuff like making making a welfare state
 
2004-01-01 10:48:37 AM
Marvin the Martian accused of being a terrorist in 4...3...2...
 
2004-01-01 10:48:42 AM
Good Grief.
 
2004-01-01 10:50:33 AM
Maybe it was eaten by Princess Anne's pooch.
 
2004-01-01 10:50:59 AM
Uh... Marvin the Martian WAS a terrorist. Thank God for special ops Bugs Bunny, otherwise the Earth would be destroyed.
 
2004-01-01 10:52:50 AM
"Dontcha think they're getting a little "Baghdad Bob" about this whole thing?"

I suppose when you work many years on a project, you'd try to hang on for at least a week or two. I know I would.
 
2004-01-01 10:53:26 AM
On the basis that they've mistakenly dropped it into a huuuuge crater - which somehow they managed to miss before and thought the landing site was perfectly flat - it's pretty much a dead loss. Shame really though, I watched something on TV a while back about the processes that went into sorting this out, and it was pretty cool stuff.

On to Beagle3 then I 'spose.
 
2004-01-01 10:53:49 AM
I know who it was!!!

Batboy ate it

(If you read Weekly World News, you know what I mean)
 
2004-01-01 10:55:28 AM
RINGO STARR IS MISSING?? Oh wait..
 
2004-01-01 10:56:33 AM
Look, it set out to find life on Mars, and its failure to transmit a signal has proved to me there is life on the Red Planet. Beagle 2 landed, and some Martian kid smashed it to shiat with a hammer. A Martian hammer, which is green and cooler than Earth hammers.
/I want to believe
 
2004-01-01 10:57:06 AM
rhiannon-
Don't you know we're part of Generation X. I got bored two days ago. Where's my Ritalin?
 
2004-01-01 11:01:17 AM
Maybe, next time they'll send a skutter instead?

Skutter
 
2004-01-01 11:04:45 AM
Shoulda sent...

 
2004-01-01 11:10:54 AM
To this day I do not understand why the various space agencies don't keep this stuff quiet.....

Manager:Hey Brad.
Brad the Space Modulator Watcher Guy:Wats up, Bill.
Manager:Just checked the telem, seems our project may have......
Brad:Everything is fine, Bill.
Manager:Yeah, but the timeframe for contact was...
Brad:EVERYTHING IS FINE, BILL. GO PLAY MISSLE COMMAND.
Manager:Okeydoke.
 
2004-01-01 11:14:26 AM
It's ok, Nasa's rovers should be there in a couple of days. They can give Beagle a jump-start
 
2004-01-01 11:21:14 AM
The NASA rovers will probably go off course and smash into it on landing...or is that what you meant by 'jump-start'?
 
2004-01-01 11:23:30 AM
Publikwerks-
We don't do Metric.
 
2004-01-01 11:32:29 AM
I got it!!

It's the machines master plan! If we launch enough robots up there, they can start building their armies in complete secrecy! Stop sending more worker robots to Mars!!

ahem...

I for one would like to welcome our new robotic overlords to the year 2004.
 
2004-01-01 11:39:26 AM
SanchezSucio We'll just pull up behind em, tell em to pop the clutch then

TheOther Hey, Nasa may screw up, but were not the one's with a broken rover.
 
2004-01-01 11:44:25 AM
Publikwerks Yet.
 
2004-01-01 11:47:40 AM
It;s not just OUR rover! The robots are working together. They don't have communist or conservatives, right wingers or left wingers. They are all coming together on Mars to kill us.

Except the liberal robots. They just get made fun of.
 
2004-01-01 11:52:43 AM
TheOther:

I think NASA has a pretty good track record when it comes to Mars, not that there is anything wrong with the ESA.....

Just leave it to the experts.
 
2004-01-01 11:53:14 AM
 
2004-01-01 11:58:17 AM
WHY DON'T YOU PEOPLE GET IT?!

Nasa wants us all dead!
Nasa sent up monkeys. Are they all accounted for?
Nasa sent up robots. Where are they now?

"We can defeat the monkeys. We can defeat the robots.
BUT NOT AT THE SAME TIME!!!"
- Lewis Black
 
2004-01-01 11:59:36 AM
Publikwerks, PottyMcNugg I will be delighted to eat crow on Saturday if the probes reach the surface safely and operate as they should. There is nothing I would like better. NASA's recent record on landings is weak.

/Columbia
 
2004-01-01 12:00:13 PM
No matter what happens with Beagle, it was glorious and superior to anything the US does/has done; just ask The Guardian.
 
2004-01-01 12:07:09 PM
Can't we all just hope that human space missions are sucessful? Sheeeesh. Tribalism won't leave us I guess.
 
2004-01-01 12:21:24 PM
Me too! I welcome our new robotic overlords to the year 2004.
What a Great day!
 
2004-01-01 12:28:46 PM
rudaydong,

Yup, the Brits managed to crash land on mars cheaper than anyone else.
 
2004-01-01 01:37:16 PM
Spectacular British Technology : Amazing the World Since 1912.

 
2004-01-01 01:49:02 PM
"The second I heard, the first time, that they were having problems locating it... I knew it was gone..."

Yeah, they probably know too (despite what they say). But you don't send what has to be a several million dollar mission to a foreign planet and give up after a day or two trying.
 
2004-01-01 01:49:41 PM
DarthBrooks: very funny.
 
2004-01-01 03:41:07 PM
My daughter just took her beagle out for a walk......



~got nuthin'
 
2004-01-01 05:08:14 PM
All your Beagles are belong to us.
 
2004-01-01 05:40:04 PM
my balls itch.
 
2004-01-01 08:17:43 PM
Try scratchin' em?
 
2004-01-01 08:20:23 PM
Don't scratch, wash.


Bad Dog! Bad Dog!
 
2004-01-02 08:56:38 AM
Would have been funnier DarthBrooks if it hadn't been an American run company that owned the Titanic.
 
2004-01-02 11:05:49 AM
The guy who wrote the Guardian article is an astronomer. He was talking from a technical point of view, rather than a nationalistic/competative one.

All he's doing is reflecting the general opinion of the worldwide scientific community.

It's a long standing debate within the American space programmes as well, and many (if not most) of your scientists think exactly the same thing as the writer...that sending people into space is not as cost effective as sending machines.

Sending men is in large part a PR excercise, and the money spent on that could be of greater benefit to science if it was spent on unmanned missions instead.

But of course, these decisions are made by politicians, not scientists, just as they are in all countries.

Note that he (Sir Martin Rees) says quote "space exploration is.. perceived as 'what NASA does'. This perception is...valid" and " the European Space Agency...cannot match the scale and range of NASA's activities." unquote.

That pretty much kills the theory that he's saying Beagle is "glorious and superior to anything the US has done";and rightly so, because it would obviously be completely ridiculous to suggest that this is the case in any single facet of history or the human experience.
 
Displayed 46 of 46 comments



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report