If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(WWLTV New Orleans) NewsFlash At least one dozen shot at New Orleans Mothers Day parade   (wwltv.com) divider line 673
    More: NewsFlash, New Orleans Mothers Day, NOPD Superintendent Ronal Serpas  
•       •       •

23113 clicks; posted to Main » on 12 May 2013 at 4:31 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»


Want to get NewsFlash notifications in email?

673 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-05-12 05:41:24 PM
Another gun thread.

DRINK
 
2013-05-12 05:41:35 PM

shiattynick: It did turn out that the Tsarnaev brothers didn't actually shoot anyone


The one MIT cop was shot and killed  in his car by one of them.
 
2013-05-12 05:42:24 PM
Seen running away form the scene:

img2u.info

...at least that's what Reddit users believe, and CNN is reporting.
 
2013-05-12 05:42:28 PM

Iplaybass: hardinparamedic: birdmanesq: Guns were involved in 2/3 of the homicides in 2011. And that omits suicides and accidents.

The point called from Beijing, and said hi.  It's not just a gun problem. It's a complex, multifactorial issue. The idea that you can distill it down to a gun problem is an insane attempt at hiding your head in the dirt.

And the majority of those homicides involved drug and drug-related crimes, and were committed using semi-automatic handguns. Yet, somehow, blatantly banning all guns is going to solve the problems?

Let's not address the drug culture and problems with the laughable "War on Drugs".
Let's not address crippling poverty, lack of a single-payer healthcare system, or the failure of the system as it stands to care for mentally ill people.
Let's not address the fact there are reasonable measures that we can undertake to reduce gun violence, such as closing background loopholes.

But no. Let's ban the guns. That'll solve everything!

It's a complex, multifactorial issue that could be halted significantly with tightened gun laws. But no, you retards are too stupid to see that. Despite the fact that it's worked elsewhere.


No it hasn't. Nobody has successfully tried to reign in a pool of 250-300 million firearms in the hands of just as many people.

But keep pretending it isn't a pipe dream despite the mountains of evidence that say otherwise.
 
2013-05-12 05:42:51 PM

WTFDYW: Another gun thread.

DRINK


merica must haz a drinking binge problem i gather?
 
2013-05-12 05:42:54 PM

Iplaybass: t's a complex, multifactorial issue that could be halted significantly with tightened gun laws. But no, you retards are too stupid to see that. Despite the fact that it's worked elsewhere.


WhyteRaven74: You're being part of the problem. No one is trying to ban all guns, but by screaming about how that's what people want to do you're using your own pants pissing fear of the world to be as much a part of the problem as an AR-15.


Uh, Hi. You know how I know you haven't been reading what I type.

I refer to people like this:

Hebalo: As a Canadian, my opinion in this counts for nothing, but seriously America: fark the second amendment. Change it, vote it out, smash it down. It's meaningless, divisive, and hurting you as a nation. Get over this gun fetish, you'll be so much stronger as a nation without it.


I'm actually on your side, you dumb farks. But you can't see that through your whargarbl.

I don't think anyone is going to ban guns, in the least. It's an unattainable goal. Period. However, it's just as damaging to those people who  want strengthening to gun laws to have those people speak for them as it is for the idiots who think obummer is going to take their guns.
 
2013-05-12 05:43:12 PM

LookForTheArrow: Noam Chimpsky: coeyagi: Noam Chimpsky: coeyagi: Noam Chimpsky: I blame the 2nd Amendment.

I blame its proponents who think tyranny is a transgendered dinosaur.

Are you an opponent of the 2nd Amendment? Clearly you aren't a proponent, right?

There are obviously a lot of you anti-2nd Amendment types. Why don't you start a petition to repeal it?  Grow a pair.

Come on chimpkens, work that trollrage a little harder, bro.

Why don't you anti 2nd Amendment people try to repeal it or modify the uninfringed right to keep and bear arms language? It just seems kinda gay to go after the proponents of a constitutional right while not going after the right itself.

THE RIGHT IS THE ONLY right with a built in limitation! Why dont we just enforce the limitation,Noam Derpsky?

/The Supreme Court has ruled "the right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose"

//shove that up the ass of 2nd Amendment Deniers - those who think the 2nd Amendment means they can do anything...
///kinda like the right to happiness means we can self-administer any drug we want to achieve happiness, right?
///the slashies compel you to stop and think!


 the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
 
2013-05-12 05:43:27 PM

Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: hardinparamedic: YoOjo: Mental health problems and gang problems are the same thing, you need to be insane to join a gang.

Hardly. You just have to be an impressionable teenager raised in a culture of quick money and violent glory, and feel alienated and like you need a "crew" to run with.

When you grow up without a prominent father figure, it's natural for you to seek some type of acceptance and validation through another means. For urban youths, gangs often fill this void.

But let's not talk about how to go about getting black fathers to stick around and raise their kids. That's racist.


Ah.  All gangs are black and no black fathers stick around.  Got it.  I'll just go tell MS-13 (can't tell me Mexicans aren't all about family), the Triads, the Mafia, the neo-nazis and white supremacist gangs, and the black Irish gangs.  Since most of their cultures place a heavy emphasis on family and parental responsibility, I'm sure they'll all be delighted to find out that their gangs don't exist.


Let me explain to you how gangs actually work-

Gang leader:  Hey kid, you live on 8th St.  Wanna join the 8th Street Crips?
Kid:  No thanks.
Gang leader:  Ookie dokie then.  *shoots kid in face or worse*


Being in a gang has nothing to do with looking for a father figure.  It has everything to do with trying to survive in a world with such severe income disparity that you are forced to cast aside any semblance of human empathy and become a sociopath just so that you can live another day.

Our policies of selfishness and our apathetic and unsympathetic attitudes toward our brothers and sisters turn our brothers and sisters into violent animals.
 
2013-05-12 05:43:34 PM
NOLA farker dickfreckle, where y'at!?
 
2013-05-12 05:43:46 PM

Hebalo: but seriously America: fark the second amendment.


But it was expressly written to ensure that the people could be armed with the same muskets that the Government has, so that they can one day rise up against the Government in the event that they get out of hand and do outrageous things like elect a black President.
 
2013-05-12 05:43:53 PM

Hebalo: As a Canadian, my opinion in this counts for nothing, but seriously America: fark the second amendment. Change it, vote it out, smash it down. It's meaningless, divisive, and hurting you as a nation. Get over this gun fetish, you'll be so much stronger as a nation without it.


You're completely right, Hebalo.

It does mean nothing.

Gun violence like this rarely has to do purely with firearm ownership or ubiquity; it has more to do with either A) mental health problems or B) engrained social problems that stem back decades from conditions that rarely existed outside of the US (poor immigrants, racism, etc.).

There are places in the US where firearms ownership is through the roof and very little gun violence occurs. Then, you have urban neighborhoods where legal firearm ownership is often low, but gun violence is a common occurrence. Seems like it's a little more complex than "blame the gun".
 
2013-05-12 05:44:15 PM

iq_in_binary: No it hasn't. Nobody has successfully tried to reign in a pool of 250-300 million firearms in the hands of just as many people.

But keep pretending it isn't a pipe dream despite the mountains of evidence that say otherwise.


In addition to the fact that even the mention of a ban is enough to get you laughed out of any political establishment. It's an unrealistic goal, and a poisoning-the-well scenario for anyone interested in legitimate strengthening and enforcement of gun laws to reduce violence.
 
2013-05-12 05:44:15 PM

Marine1: hardinparamedic: Marine1: Sounds like a gang hit.

Carried out by people who aren't supposed to have guns and probably obtained them illegally, and wouldn't give them up if they were banned.

The sad thing is that while banning guns wouldn't have prevented a banger hit, that reasonable enforcement and enhancement of measures that could identify the straw buyers of weapons intended to be sold on the streets could have limited access for bangers.

Hint: They're not getting those glocks from south of the border.

Problem is, they don't even buy them. They break into gun stores and homes and take them. There's a reason most gun stores have bars on the windows and resemble fortresses.


That is not true. While a small amount of guns in the hands of criminals come from stealing them, the grand majority are obtained threw straw purchases. There was a study from Chicago that said that something like 70% of the guns used in murders in the city one year were all traced to one suburban gun store.
 
2013-05-12 05:45:08 PM

hardinparamedic: LookForTheArrow: YOURE THE ONE SUGGESTING WE BAN GUNS. SMART PEOPLE ARE SUGGESTING WE CONTROL THEM, JERKFACE

you are a puppet: Whoa, there are people trying to ban all the guns? And blatantly even?

You haven't been on FARK in the past several weeks, have you?

People like  ontariolightning are just as bad as people who act like anyone talking regulation means Obummer is gonna march in and jackboot their throats while they take their guns.


I've been on almost every day. So a guy named ontariolightning is trying to ban all the guns? Sounds like a Canadian. Any Americans? Any politicians or political groups trying to blatantly ban all the guns, anyone of note, any proposed legislation to ban all the guns, or just a Canadian guy on the internet?
 
2013-05-12 05:45:27 PM
If less people had guns then less people would be accidentally killed by them.. no yes yes no no yes? No? Yes?
 
2013-05-12 05:46:46 PM

ongbok: That is not true. While a small amount of guns in the hands of criminals come from stealing them, the grand majority are obtained threw straw purchases. There was a study from Chicago that said that something like 70% of the guns used in murders in the city one year were all traced to one suburban gun store.


This.

These people buy in bulk at gun shows, and from reputable gun shops who are too naive or too stupid to catch the fact that the guy who bought 20 glocks in one setting MIGHT have an ulterior motive. They then carry these weapons down to Johnny Banger and sell them at a slightly increased premium.

They're not getting them from breaking into gun stores. The bangers in Memphis are quite well armed, and we don't have gunshops being broke into.
 
2013-05-12 05:46:57 PM

coeyagi: Noam Chimpsky: coeyagi: Noam Chimpsky: coeyagi: Noam Chimpsky: coeyagi: Noam Chimpsky: I blame the 2nd Amendment.

I blame its proponents who think tyranny is a transgendered dinosaur.

Are you an opponent of the 2nd Amendment? Clearly you aren't a proponent, right?

There are obviously a lot of you anti-2nd Amendment types. Why don't you start a petition to repeal it?  Grow a pair.

Come on chimpkens, work that trollrage a little harder, bro.

Why don't you anti 2nd Amendment people try to repeal it or modify the uninfringed right to keep and bear arms language? It just seems kinda gay to go after the proponents of a constitutional right while not going after the right itself.

Not really. If you have a greater than 3rd grade education, you can interpret the 2nd amendment like I do which is to mean it can be regulated, which is what we are discussing.

How do you define "uninfringed"? Even your leftist scotus justices aren't gonna pretend "well-regulated militia" means you get to infringe on the people's right to keep and bear arms. "Well-regulated" means "formidable and dependable" and regards the commentary on the importance of the militia. The formidable and dependable militia is obsolete after we went to a standing army.

It might be your best argument for repealing the 2nd by showing that the founders felt the most important reason to give the people an uninfringed right to keep and bear arms was for militia purposes. However, it was not the only reason for the uninfringed right to keep and bear arms.

Don't hate on the proponents of the Bill of Rights if you are too cowardly to repeal the ones that offend you.

I was unaware that I had the power to repeal an amendment.

Thanks for the lesson, chimp.


Of course you have the power. The left is saying the vast majority of Americans favor infringing on citizens' right to keep and bear arms. It should be cinch to repeal it.
 
2013-05-12 05:47:02 PM
We just need to teach people to stop shooting.
 
2013-05-12 05:48:16 PM
Second amendment protects guns, technically, it doesn't say anything about ammunition.  Control the distribution and sale of ammo, and watch as Murica's stockpile of private arms become expense clubs.  No confiscation required.
 
2013-05-12 05:48:24 PM

Noam Chimpsky: the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


you are beyond stupid. Since WHEN did "not infringed" mean "not limited".

Noam Chimpsky: HE RIGHT IS THE ONLY right with a built in limitation! Why dont we just enforce the limitation,Noam Derpsky?

/The Supreme Court has ruled "the right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose"

//shove that up the ass of 2nd Amendment Deniers - those who think the 2nd Amendment means they can do anything...
///kinda like the right to happiness means we can self-administer any drug we want to achieve happiness, right?
///the slashies compel you to stop and think!

 the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


Why dont you take it up with the Supreme Court, you traitor.
 
2013-05-12 05:48:31 PM
Anyone have a scanner link?

*ducks*
 
2013-05-12 05:48:35 PM

Warthog: This is New Orleans' Katrina.


/thread
 
2013-05-12 05:49:46 PM

LordJiro: Shiat. Copycats of the Tsarnaev brothers? Or unrelated lunatics? Either way, hope they get caught damn quickly.


Nothing like that, just NO thugs with a grudge.
 
2013-05-12 05:50:09 PM

WhyteRaven74: Supporting background checks and the like isn't being opposed to the second amendment. There are gun dealers who support all sorts of stuff the NRA would have a coronary over, yet one can't say they're opposed to the second amendment.


The stuff I was talking about are things like the failed AWB in congress, the NY limit of five bullet magazines and so on. Just tightening up on background checks isn't the same as saying that entire classes of weapons might not be available soon. If someone was on the fence about purchasing something (anything, not just guns) and they perceive that that item might not be available soon they will try and buy it before they no longer can. This isn't rocket surgery.

For example, I remember as a kid saccharine was being considered being reclassified as a banned substance by the FDA. Stores sold out of the stuff almost immediately. Same principle.
 
2013-05-12 05:52:41 PM

WhyteRaven74: Lsherm: It's New Orleans. Is this unusual for New Orleans, or is it just that it happened during a parade? I thought that city had a terrible crime problem.

12 people being shot in one incident is unusual for anywhere in the US. Even in South Central LA in the late 80s and early 90s it would've been extremely unusual.


I agree, that wasn't quite what I meant.  It sounds like these were bystanders hurt in a shootout, not a directed massacre.  I was just wondering if shootouts were unusual in New Orleans, or if they were as common as they are in Chicago.
 
2013-05-12 05:52:49 PM

Noam Chimpsky: LookForTheArrow: Noam Chimpsky: coeyagi: Noam Chimpsky: coeyagi: Noam Chimpsky: I blame the 2nd Amendment.

I blame its proponents who think tyranny is a transgendered dinosaur.

Are you an opponent of the 2nd Amendment? Clearly you aren't a proponent, right?

There are obviously a lot of you anti-2nd Amendment types. Why don't you start a petition to repeal it?  Grow a pair.

Come on chimpkens, work that trollrage a little harder, bro.

Why don't you anti 2nd Amendment people try to repeal it or modify the uninfringed right to keep and bear arms language? It just seems kinda gay to go after the proponents of a constitutional right while not going after the right itself.

THE RIGHT IS THE ONLY right with a built in limitation! Why dont we just enforce the limitation,Noam Derpsky?

/The Supreme Court has ruled "the right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose"

//shove that up the ass of 2nd Amendment Deniers - those who think the 2nd Amendment means they can do anything...
///kinda like the right to happiness means we can self-administer any drug we want to achieve happiness, right?
///the slashies compel you to stop and think!

 the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


So do you think private citizens should be allowed to own nuclear weapons? If not, you're already 'infringing' on that right, since 'arms' is defined as 'weapons'. Not just 'firearms'.

So unless you think private citizens should be able to own nukes, we're just negotiating the level of infringement.
 
2013-05-12 05:53:29 PM

you are a puppet: I've been on almost every day. So a guy named ontariolightning is trying to ban all the guns? Sounds like a Canadian. Any Americans? Any politicians or political groups trying to blatantly ban all the guns, anyone of note, any proposed legislation to ban all the guns, or just a Canadian guy on the internet?


Several politicians have in the past, yes. However, I won't link to that or use that claim as evidence for the way I feel the way I do until I can find a neutral source for the quote, like AJE or BBC. I don't trust right-wing sites to link actual statements made without modifications.

ontariolightning: If less people had guns then less people would be accidentally killed by them.. no yes yes no no yes? No? Yes?


The Population of the United States is 312.8 million people. According to the Centers for Disease Control, 0.2 in 100,000 deaths were caused by firearms accidents. That's 719 people, roughly.

By contrast, 26,000 people were killed by falls in 2010.
 
2013-05-12 05:53:56 PM

Hebalo: As a Canadian, my opinion in this counts for nothing, but seriously America: fark the second amendment. Change it, vote it out, smash it down. It's meaningless, divisive, and hurting you as a nation. Get over this gun fetish, you'll be so much stronger as a nation without it.


How else will we resist the coming invasion of the white walkers from north of the wall?
 
2013-05-12 05:54:41 PM

LookForTheArrow: Why dont you take it up with the Supreme Court, you traitor.


Something tells me that if  NoamChimpsky actually knew what the SCOTUS said on the Second Amendment, his head would explode.
 
2013-05-12 05:55:14 PM

Fissile: Second amendment protects guns, technically, it doesn't say anything about ammunition.  Control the distribution and sale of ammo, and watch as Murica's stockpile of private arms become expense clubs.  No confiscation required.


Oh you're clever. Clearly no one could see through or object to your over-lawyered plan.

I mean, if you're witty enough, you ought to be able to slip that right by American citizens.
 
2013-05-12 05:55:38 PM

Mugato: Hebalo: but seriously America: fark the second amendment.

But it was expressly written to ensure that the people could be armed with the same muskets that the Government has, so that they can one day rise up against the Government in the event that they get out of hand and do outrageous things like elect a black President.


Lol. Yes but anyone who thinks some street gang armed with pistols, or a bunch of loonies in Montana are going to stop Seal Team 6 when they come for your guns is delusional.
 
2013-05-12 05:56:36 PM

hardinparamedic: The Population of the United States is 312.8 million people. According to the Centers for Disease Control, 0.2 in 100,000 deaths were caused by firearms accidents. That's 719 people, roughly.

By contrast, 26,000 people were killed by falls in 2010.


Right there in the middle of the page you link to it says under All firearm deaths:
Number of deaths: 31,672Deaths per 100,000 population: 10.3
 
2013-05-12 05:56:38 PM

Noam Chimpsky: the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


www.thereheis.com

Founding Father 1: All right, we're done.
Founding Father 2: You think the language in the second amendment is clear enough? You know, about the right to bear arms?
Founding Father 3: Of course it's clear, every American has the right to hang a pair of bear arms on their wall. How could that possibly be misconstrued?


Pretty sure if the founding fathers looked forward in time, they would have put a little more definition in the 2nd. Highly doubt they wanted to secure the right for people to be able to walk around carrying guns that have enough firepower to kill a small gathering of people in a matter of a few seconds. Of course, they also revered intellect, knowledge and reason... things that, if not long lost, have become detested in this country.
 
2013-05-12 05:56:43 PM

iq_in_binary: Watch how fast it gets buried if it turns out to be gang related.

Will Fox, MSNBC and CNN be covering this in a few hours? Will there be non-stop coverage for the next 3 days?

I'm guessing no. Nobody cares unless it's white people.


MSM won't care. The gun nuts will bring this up as yet more need to arm whites against blacks.
 
2013-05-12 05:56:50 PM

Stone Meadow: Hebalo: As a Canadian, my opinion in this counts for nothing, but seriously America: fark the second amendment. Change it, vote it out, smash it down. It's meaningless, divisive, and hurting you as a nation. Get over this gun fetish, you'll be so much stronger as a nation without it.

How else will we resist the coming invasion of the white walkers from north of the wall?


Wait until you see our Horse Head mosaics.
 
2013-05-12 05:57:22 PM

you are a puppet: hardinparamedic: LookForTheArrow: YOURE THE ONE SUGGESTING WE BAN GUNS. SMART PEOPLE ARE SUGGESTING WE CONTROL THEM, JERKFACE

you are a puppet: Whoa, there are people trying to ban all the guns? And blatantly even?

You haven't been on FARK in the past several weeks, have you?

People like  ontariolightning are just as bad as people who act like anyone talking regulation means Obummer is gonna march in and jackboot their throats while they take their guns.

I've been on almost every day. So a guy named ontariolightning is trying to ban all the guns? Sounds like a Canadian. Any Americans? Any politicians or political groups trying to blatantly ban all the guns, anyone of note, any proposed legislation to ban all the guns, or just a Canadian guy on the internet?


Speaking as a Canadian... I don't agree with banning all guns. I do agree that perhaps there are too many guns, and certain guns are better off not owned (I actually worry more about handguns than AR-15's). Would ne nice to have a stricter requirement for buying a gun, and that each gun has DNA identification similar to a Lawgiver 2... but that's probably a few years away.
 
2013-05-12 05:57:33 PM

iq_in_binary: coeyagi: super_grass: coeyagi: Dimensio: Nabb1: EVERYBODY PANIC: Hey, that's my hometown. Only a dozen injured? And this is news? Meh.

Local reports seem to indicate one gang member shooting at another in a crowd and hitting just about everyone else but the guy he wanted to shoot. But, hey, political circle jerk.

Gun rights advocates remain hopeful that some of the injured will eventually die so the NRA can go on the defensive and drive gun sales.

FTFY

That makes zero sense. If what you said was true then gun sales would jump after every local gangland drive-by.

Gun sales jumped after the shootings because suddenly politicians and news networks started talking about gun control. People decided to guy guns before it becomes harder/more expensive to do so.

It's the Streisand effect, not some NRA conspiracy.

Oh dear lord.  Sure, you just keep believing that if the NRA isn't stoking the fire of fear in gun owners, that the guns and ammo will be flying off the shelves at the rate they've been.

Follow the money.

1) Tragedy.
2) Call for gun control.
3) NRA stokes fear.
4) People buy guns / ammo.
5) More money in gun manufacturers' pockets.
6) More money to go to the NRA from gun manufacturers.

I am not saying they would do this, but given that model, it would be in the best financial interest of everyone if the NRA just armed all the school children it could.  But I am SURE they haven't every suggested anything remotely similar to that before...

That you think the NRA is funded by gun manufacturers shows just how little you know about the subject.

Now, I'm not saying that the whole fear stoking cycle doesn't exist--it is obvious that it does--but to say that it is some grand conspiracy on the part of gun manufacturers is wholly ignorant and just as desperately conspiratorial as the Alex Jones crowd tends to be.

The NRA is funded by dues, even the NRA-ILA's lobbying is funded almost entirely by member dues.


Yeah, you're actually wrong there chief.   http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-29/nra-raises-200-million-as-gu n -lobby-toasters-burn-logo-on-bread.html

Jesus, did you really think I wasn't going to be able to back that up?  Sad.
 
2013-05-12 05:57:42 PM

dfenstrate: Fissile: Second amendment protects guns, technically, it doesn't say anything about ammunition.  Control the distribution and sale of ammo, and watch as Murica's stockpile of private arms become expense clubs.  No confiscation required.

Oh you're clever. Clearly no one could see through or object to your over-lawyered plan.

I mean, if you're witty enough, you ought to be able to slip that right by American citizens.


He already has. The American citizens are doing it to themselves through panic buying. The average shooter can't get ammunition easily at their neighborhood sporting or department store unless they're willing to line up in the sporting goods department an hour and a half before they open.
 
2013-05-12 05:58:30 PM

Fissile: Second amendment protects guns, technically, it doesn't say anything about ammunition.  Control the distribution and sale of ammo, and watch as Murica's stockpile of private arms become expense clubs.  No confiscation required.


That is part of the arms so, no.  Nice try.
 
2013-05-12 05:58:41 PM

The first thing I looked at: coeyagi: The first thing I looked at: coeyagi: t3knomanser: Belatryx: Oh FFS people. Can we just go one week without mass shootings?

Ironically, the frequency of gun violence is far lower than it was only two decades ago. Nobody  feels that way, but  it's true

Obviously, the solution is to do nothing then.  I am sure the thousands of dead people from gun crimes each year are resting easy in their graves knowing that fact.

I know, we should just pass a law that makes crimes illegal and then they won't happen anymore.

Strawmanus Douchebagus.

1/10.

What an enlightening reply. I suppose you didn't have any real response to that though, so just go with insults again. Its how normal people can tell you shouldn't be taken seriously.


Dude, you put down a strawman right out of the gate, which is an insult to my intelligence.  In what f*cking world do you think you deserve anything more?
 
2013-05-12 05:58:49 PM
Aww jeez, not this shiat again.
 
2013-05-12 05:59:31 PM
25.media.tumblr.com
 
2013-05-12 05:59:36 PM
There was a major gang indictment unsealed in New Orleans the other day.  This could possibly be the beginning of a war against the gangs of New Orleans.
 
2013-05-12 06:00:26 PM

The All-Powerful Atheismo: Swoop1809: Now is not the time to talk about gun control

That's because it was too soon after the tragedy when you posted that comment.  Now that I've posted mine, it's too late.


No, it'll continue to be too soon until next month's mass shooting.
 
2013-05-12 06:00:43 PM

LordJiro: Noam Chimpsky: LookForTheArrow: Noam Chimpsky: coeyagi: Noam Chimpsky: coeyagi: Noam Chimpsky: I blame the 2nd Amendment.

I blame its proponents who think tyranny is a transgendered dinosaur.

Are you an opponent of the 2nd Amendment? Clearly you aren't a proponent, right?

There are obviously a lot of you anti-2nd Amendment types. Why don't you start a petition to repeal it?  Grow a pair.

Come on chimpkens, work that trollrage a little harder, bro.

Why don't you anti 2nd Amendment people try to repeal it or modify the uninfringed right to keep and bear arms language? It just seems kinda gay to go after the proponents of a constitutional right while not going after the right itself.

THE RIGHT IS THE ONLY right with a built in limitation! Why dont we just enforce the limitation,Noam Derpsky?

/The Supreme Court has ruled "the right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose"

//shove that up the ass of 2nd Amendment Deniers - those who think the 2nd Amendment means they can do anything...
///kinda like the right to happiness means we can self-administer any drug we want to achieve happiness, right?
///the slashies compel you to stop and think!

 the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

So do you think private citizens should be allowed to own nuclear weapons? If not, you're already 'infringing' on that right, since 'arms' is defined as 'weapons'. Not just 'firearms'.

So unless you think private citizens should be able to own nukes, we're just negotiating the level of infringement.


Read a dictionary. Only an idiot thinks a nuclear bomb is classified as an "arm," it's ordnance.

The Second Amendment clearly applies to small arms, although there were framers who were fans of private ownership of ordnance too. A good portion of the cannon used in not just the Revolutionary War but the Civil War as well were privately owned.

The argument you just made is reductio ad absurdem, plain and simple. You are literally just as retarded as the creationists who dismiss evolution with "Why are there still monkeys?" argument.
 
2013-05-12 06:00:45 PM

Stone Meadow: Right there in the middle of the page you link to it says under All firearm deaths:
Number of deaths: 31,672Deaths per 100,000 population: 10.3


Clicking on links is clearly hard for you. The CDC Breaks it down here. Total Firearms deaths include those deaths by violence, those deaths by suicide, and those deaths by accidental discharge.

i.imgur.com
 
2013-05-12 06:01:14 PM

Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: Kinetocracy: Guess the race.

It was a parade.


A 5K sponsored by Macy's?
 
2013-05-12 06:01:30 PM
America! Totally Gay For GunsTM
 
2013-05-12 06:01:31 PM
Wall-to-wall coverage....

4.bp.blogspot.com

Hey, did you hear about Benghazi...

mattsakakeeny.files.wordpress.com
 
2013-05-12 06:01:55 PM

Unrelated, but this was the cover of today's New York Post:


img.photobucket.com

/classy
 
Displayed 50 of 673 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report