If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Chron)   Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg says that while she supports Roe vs. Wade, she feels the ruling by her predecessors on the court was too sweeping and gave abortion opponents a symbol to target   (chron.com) divider line 15
    More: Interesting, Ginsberg, University of Chicago Law School, abortions, judicial restraint, abortion opponents, U.S. Supreme Court, same-sex marriages  
•       •       •

1651 clicks; posted to Politics » on 12 May 2013 at 5:10 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-05-12 02:20:35 AM
5 votes:

MaudlinMutantMollusk: She looks tired


sorry.  I kept her up late last night.
2013-05-12 12:18:52 PM
2 votes:
Why are people against common-sense abortion control? No one is coming to take your abortions away. If these changes will save one life, just one life, then it will be worth it.
2013-05-12 06:52:22 PM
1 votes:

djkutch: Etchy333: I'm sure this is the thread where we will settle all controversies on abortion once and for all.

I think it's possible. My question is how much do you tip the abortion doc?


media.zenfs.com
2013-05-12 05:17:59 PM
1 votes:

Alphax: I don't think the people demanding control over women's bodies are going to relent soon.


NO NO NO, it has nothing to do with controlling women, it's purely about protecting the innocent child which should be obvious since once that child is born they are willing to pay any amount of taxes to make sure that child grows up healthy and educated, right?
2013-05-12 12:57:50 PM
1 votes:

Doom MD: We need to ban 3d printers. Someone could print out coat hangers and have an abortion.


You are trying way too hard.

You're like the Michael Scott of Fark.
2013-05-12 12:51:03 PM
1 votes:

The My Little Pony Killer: Delawheredad: Hardinparamedic

  And as the Gosnell trial so deftly demonstrates in some ways things have not changed one iota. The man is a butcher now and would have been a butcher then. He's completely legal, was state inspected and yet is the very thing that Rowe was SUPPOSED to do away with!

 Abortion is a nasty procedure no matter where you stand on the issue of its legality.

No matter where you stand on the issue, somebody who wants an abortion will seek it regardless of its safety and legality. You don't care to protect those lives?

We need to ban 3d printers. Someone could print out coat hangers and have an abortion.
2013-05-12 12:48:27 PM
1 votes:

The My Little Pony Killer: Doom MD: Why are people against common-sense abortion control? No one is coming to take your abortions away. If these changes will save one life, just one life, then it will be worth it.

Those changes won't save a life, they'll just make mine more miserable, as I'd still seek an abortion. Only now it won't be safe. Now, I'll be risking major infections if my birth control should fail. That's not a life saved.

That's you getting your squishy, feel-good emotions by ruining somebody else's life.


Why won't you compromise on abortion control? You abortion nuts get so uptight whenever anyone suggests a tightening of regulations. There have been 53 million abortions in the USA since 1973. No one is coming for your coat hangers.
2013-05-12 12:40:21 PM
1 votes:
I'm curious as to how the pro-life movement views showering. No, really, hear me out..

They state that a zygote is a human life and everything, yet cleaning their own bodies they kill more advanced single-celled organisms on a genocidal scale. How do they sleep at night knowing they are worse than a million Hitlers?
2013-05-12 09:54:34 AM
1 votes:

Tyrone Slothrop: How was giving women the right to their own bodies too sweeping? Was freeing the slaves too sweeping? Maybe we should allow slavery in certain circumstances, to pacify people who miss the old south.


We have the right to privacy or we do not. They are going to have to rule on this matter. Guess which one will win.
2013-05-12 09:49:52 AM
1 votes:

Tyrone Slothrop: Maybe we should allow slavery in certain circumstances, to pacify people who miss the old south.


Technically, we  DO.

datedaily.mate1.com

As long as it's consensual.
2013-05-12 09:30:24 AM
1 votes:
i.imgur.com

/oblig
2013-05-12 08:54:23 AM
1 votes:

badhatharry: More like it makes no sense when we have no right to privacy for medical procedures.


HIPAA allows people the right to privacy regarding medical procedures. That's why someone else's abortion is none of your goddamn business.

/Pro choice
//Five hole punches on my card from the Rape N Scrape
///One more, and I get a free hat.
2013-05-12 08:49:14 AM
1 votes:
Don't abortions get one closer to Nirvana since they recycle the spirit faster?
2013-05-12 03:09:47 AM
1 votes:
I had a pregnancy scare once (I'm the guy), and while I'm not a personal fan of the procedure I can't in a million years imagine being the voice in charge of whether you can have it or not. It was a grueling month - she had made it clear that's what would happen and I struggled with having to live with this plus the fact that I couldn't have possibly provided the life I would imagine for a kid at that stage in my life. Ultimately, though, it was her body. I just made a guest appearance one night.

I think it's unfair that people equate being pro-choice with the idea that we're all going out to the abortoplex to have some fun on a Saturday night. They even have a concession stand! But no...no one actually digs abortion. It's just the rational thing to do. You're ruining three lives when the child isn't wanted or can't be afforded.

Now at the age of 38 I still have problems dealing with my neurotic, adopted puppy. You want me handling a child? I'm not even sure how to properly hold one, and with some luck will never have to.
2013-05-12 02:22:35 AM
1 votes:

Bucky Katt: MaudlinMutantMollusk: She looks tired

sorry.  I kept her up late last night.


All of 6:00 PM, huh?

/damned daylight savings time can spoil an evening
 
Displayed 15 of 15 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report