Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Russia Today)   New "Jihadi" magazine says that Muslims all over the world should devote themselves to developing software and tools to hack into US drones and take them over or disable them, and that if they could do that really really, soon that'd be super..,   (rt.com) divider line 90
    More: Obvious, Muslims, mujahideens, commercial software, Iraqi insurgents  
•       •       •

3049 clicks; posted to Main » on 07 May 2013 at 12:31 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



90 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2013-05-07 12:32:51 PM  
So we'll chalk that down as the Reaper drone is really effective.
 
2013-05-07 12:37:33 PM  
Hate to say it, but... Yeah. Can't blame 'em.
 
2013-05-07 12:37:38 PM  
Is it harder to develop weapons technology to shoot a drone down than it is to hack one?  Of course you do get a free drone if you figure out how to hack it.  But at that point you become to monster you're fighting.
 
2013-05-07 12:37:40 PM  
So, this link isn't another "Featured Partner" on Fark?

/guess not
 
2013-05-07 12:38:21 PM  
Jihadi magazine?  Sounds interesting, but I already get all of my information from Grit Magazine.

If I sell enough subscriptions, maybe I can earn a new red Schwinn bike.
 
2013-05-07 12:38:39 PM  
If you had skills like that, you could just get a job in the West.
 
2013-05-07 12:39:13 PM  
I thought you could hack them with a simple cell phone?
 
2013-05-07 12:39:20 PM  
What really sucks with Jihadi magazine is when you call them to cancel your subscription and they keep billing your credit card anyway. I HATE that.
 
2013-05-07 12:39:34 PM  
So they watch Castle too?
 
2013-05-07 12:39:54 PM  
..,

click click derk

southparkstudios.mtvnimages.com
 
2013-05-07 12:40:54 PM  

DubtodaIll: Is it harder to develop weapons technology to shoot a drone down than it is to hack one?  Of course you do get a free drone if you figure out how to hack it.  But at that point you become to monster you're fighting.


I'm pretty sure that it's not the mere use of drones that has caused them to take up arms.
 
2013-05-07 12:41:08 PM  
They shoud perfect Security Bullseye and they should be set.
 
2013-05-07 12:41:32 PM  
I heard the centerfold showed her nose and ankles this month the harlot!
 
2013-05-07 12:42:25 PM  
hey, whatever it takes to get kids to start studying science these days.
 
2013-05-07 12:43:11 PM  
What if we were being lied to this whole time and the drones are actually being piloted by naval trained dolphins?  So even if they hacked the drones, nothing would happen because the dolphins are inside flying the drones?

Study it out!
 
2013-05-07 12:43:11 PM  
Why set their goals so low?
 
2013-05-07 12:43:20 PM  

groppet: I heard the centerfold showed her nose and ankles this month the harlot!


Sucks that she has to be stoned o death now. Those were some sexy ankles.
 
2013-05-07 12:44:19 PM  
Just stage "wedding parties" out in bumfark areas of mere cardboard cut-outs and clear out, waiting for the inevitable waste of US taxpayer money.
 
2013-05-07 12:45:25 PM  

FullMetalPanda: What if we were being lied to this whole time and the drones are actually being piloted by naval trained dolphins?  So even if they hacked the drones, nothing would happen because the dolphins are inside flying the drones?

Study it out!



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uplift_Universe

David Brin and the uplift saga would like a word with you
 
2013-05-07 12:48:44 PM  
 
2013-05-07 12:50:48 PM  
rt.com

Do even bad journalists right this way? I'm pretty sure its common to use two separate sentences or to just not quote unreliable sources rather than use parentheses egregious manner.  Also, its written in english, which the article points out.  This couldn't smell any more fake.
 
2013-05-07 12:52:31 PM  
What am I gonna do with 40 subscriptions to "Jihadi"?
 
2013-05-07 12:54:18 PM  
And there's no way this is put out by he CIA to locate people to be taken out by drones. Pay no attention to the beeping staple.
 
2013-05-07 12:54:26 PM  

new_york_monty: Castle


Came here to say this.
 
2013-05-07 12:54:37 PM  
Someone watched Castle last night it seems
 
2013-05-07 12:54:40 PM  

Abuse Liability: [rt.com image 690x388]

Do even bad journalists right this way? I'm pretty sure its common to use two separate sentences or to just not quote unreliable sources rather than use parentheses egregious manner.  Also, its written in english, which the article points out.  This couldn't smell any more fake.


What's really funny is I use the word *right* instead of write and left out *in an* before egregious when criticizing this paper's grammar.  Then again, I've never claimed to be a journalist.
 
2013-05-07 12:54:43 PM  
Why don't they just pray to Allah?
 
2013-05-07 12:55:22 PM  
Seems like it would be a lot less work just to quit bombing everyone you meet and go about your lives, then the drones cease to be a problem.
 
2013-05-07 12:55:58 PM  
From worshipping a meteorite to hacking, Muslims have come a long way.

Well, not really, they're still in the first part.
At least they've set goals, unobtainable though they may be.
 
2013-05-07 12:56:44 PM  
New "Jihadi" magazine says that Muslims all over the world should devote themselves to developing software and tools to hack into US drones and take them over or disable them

www.mobilisationlab.org
 
2013-05-07 12:58:17 PM  

Abuse Liability: FullMetalPanda: What if we were being lied to this whole time and the drones are actually being piloted by naval trained dolphins?  So even if they hacked the drones, nothing would happen because the dolphins are inside flying the drones?

Study it out!


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uplift_Universe

David Brin and the uplift saga would like a word with you


The Navy has been experimenting and training dolphins for years, despite scifi dude... FMP has a point... who knows what we got from Roswell
 
2013-05-07 01:03:25 PM  
www.wired.com
 
2013-05-07 01:03:47 PM  
The Saga of Booyi Habib:

I had a friend who went to a lot of tech conferences, and I made the mistake of telling him a technique you could use to see who is selling your name to whomever... "Yeah, just make up a name when they ask you to sign up."

Years pass, and my dad rents a room to said person. More years pass and he moves out.

Years after that, Dad is STILL getting mail for "Booyi Habib." He finally gets tired of it and writes what is probably the most amusing "cancel my subscription" letter ever to a dozen senders. I shall write him and ask if he still has a copy so I can post it under the (awsome) tag. It basically said that Booyi Habib had been executed as a terrorist, and that (real name redacted) was now living under another name under the witness protection program, so stop sending your damn magazine.
 
2013-05-07 01:05:41 PM  

cameroncrazy1984: What am I gonna do with 40 subscriptions to "Jihadi"?


My wife and I are still pissed Spin was replaced by Car and Driver.

/I give the car and driver mags to my neighbor.
 
2013-05-07 01:08:29 PM  
I can see their desire to request such a thing. Really though we know a great deal of their operations come out of the northern area of Pakistan so instead of this Mickey Mouse targeting by drones why don't we just covertly drop in a nuke or biological and be done with it?
 
gja
2013-05-07 01:14:47 PM  
"Yeeeeaaahhhhhhh, thanksssss Peter......
encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com
 
2013-05-07 01:16:42 PM  

Abuse Liability: Do even bad journalists right this way?


Sigh...
 
2013-05-07 01:18:01 PM  
Back in the day, Jihad meant something like "an fearless and thorough moral inventory," but in contemporary times that sounds just too much like AA, whose members would balk at any kind of sartorial conformity like wearing vest, with or without explosives.
 
2013-05-07 01:19:23 PM  
Would it not just be easier for them to buy a bunch of remote-control airplanes, strap IEDs to them, and just fly them around and smash them into the drones?

I mean, I'm no military genius but I came up with that in a couple seconds. I see the hobbyist RC planes around here all the time. Some of them are very tiny, and some are about half the size of the real thing. They fly easily enough. Some have cameras in them. I'm not even an RC hobbyist and I know all this.

So it would seem to me that a bunch of loonies who know how to make IEDs in their cellar would make the obvious leap of logic and use RC planes to deliver their payload  and  patrol their skies.

Not that I want to help these assholes, but I can't believe they haven't thought of this.

For that matter, I don't know why the military spends so much on the drones when they could do the same; Load up regular RC planes with a payload and have soldiers and pilots handle them from a remote location. I could cut the drone budget by millions, I'm sure, and get the same effect.

The terrorists would not believe that a 1/3 scale model of a Piper J3 Cub is going to kill them.
 
2013-05-07 01:28:51 PM  

ZeroCorpse: Would it not just be easier for them to buy a bunch of remote-control airplanes, strap IEDs to them, and just fly them around and smash them into the drones?

I mean, I'm no military genius but I came up with that in a couple seconds. I see the hobbyist RC planes around here all the time. Some of them are very tiny, and some are about half the size of the real thing. They fly easily enough. Some have cameras in them. I'm not even an RC hobbyist and I know all this.

So it would seem to me that a bunch of loonies who know how to make IEDs in their cellar would make the obvious leap of logic and use RC planes to deliver their payload  and  patrol their skies.

Not that I want to help these assholes, but I can't believe they haven't thought of this.

For that matter, I don't know why the military spends so much on the drones when they could do the same; Load up regular RC planes with a payload and have soldiers and pilots handle them from a remote location. I could cut the drone budget by millions, I'm sure, and get the same effect.

The terrorists would not believe that a 1/3 scale model of a Piper J3 Cub is going to kill them.


No.

Model jets wouldn't be able to fly fast enough, accurately enough, or high enough to even go near a drone. That would be like trying to take out a zeppelin from the ground with a lawn dart.
 
2013-05-07 01:29:41 PM  
You know what. Even as an american, that seems fair. It's the balance of military forces that keeps the peace, and peace doesn't mean flying over and striking countries and organizations that have no recourse. Let them try to hack in, and at the worst we'll employee a few thousand people to keep up with the hacking war's evolution.
 
2013-05-07 01:31:37 PM  
Yeah...great circulation numbers and all...but they just charged my software training client "Adobe, Allah and You - Photoshopping Fear" over $5k for a full page spread. I'd expect that kind of number from a less reputable cash grabby magazine, but not you Jihadi Weekly...tsk, tsk, tsk...
 
2013-05-07 01:33:21 PM  

PC LOAD LETTER: Abuse Liability: Do even bad journalists right this way?

Sigh...


Just so you're aware, I corrected myself a few posts down from the one you cited after realizing my mistake.  Did you miss that post or were you just so very eager to correct me that you didn't finish reading the thread before you could jump all over it?
 
2013-05-07 01:35:02 PM  
Somaticasual:

You know what. Even as an american, that seems fair. It's the balance of military forces that keeps the peace, and peace doesn't mean flying over and striking countries and organizations that have no recourse. Let them try to hack in, and at the worst we'll employee a few thousand people to keep up with the hacking war's evolution.

You'd think the 2nd amendment sorts would be all over this.
 
2013-05-07 01:35:29 PM  
"Predator'); DROP TABLE Drones;--
 
2013-05-07 01:42:47 PM  

SirEattonHogg: Jihadi magazine?  Sounds interesting, but I already get all of my information from Grit Magazine.

If I sell enough subscriptions, maybe I can earn a new red Schwinn bike.


One subscription please.
 
2013-05-07 01:43:34 PM  
 
2013-05-07 01:44:59 PM  
I imagine that a subscription to this magazine would require a prepayment in case your readers went along with your advice. Otherwise it just seems like an ever declining business model.
 
2013-05-07 01:55:28 PM  
On the other side, the US is developing a program to let US citizens fire off a missile for $40 each.
 
2013-05-07 02:08:58 PM  

LavenderWolf: Model jets wouldn't be able to fly fast enough, accurately enough, or high enough to even go near a drone. That would be like trying to take out a zeppelin from the ground with a lawn dart.


Especially since you can't even buy lawn darts anymore. I wonder if it was for that reason? They should bring them back since we don't use zeppelins now, so they won't be dangerous any more.
 
2013-05-07 02:09:29 PM  

BitwiseShift: Back in the day, Jihad meant something like "an fearless and thorough moral inventory," but in contemporary times that sounds just too much like AA, whose members would balk at any kind of sartorial conformity like wearing vest, with or without explosives.


Sartorial conformity nothing, just try to even get an AA group to decide on a coffee distributor at a business meeting sometime. It's less like herding cats and more like trying to force the north poles of ten magnets together all at once with your hands.
 
2013-05-07 02:11:26 PM  

maxheck: Hate to say it, but... Yeah. Can't blame 'em.


Yup. If  foreign owned killbots were flying over my country's airspace blowing up civilians I'd become quite devoted to learning how to make them stop working.
 
2013-05-07 02:11:39 PM  
There is only one drone I am interested in hacking into.
ec2.images-amazon.com
 
2013-05-07 02:23:36 PM  

DubtodaIll: Is it harder to develop weapons technology to shoot a drone down than it is to hack one?


I imagine it's hard to do either when you live in a farking cave.
 
2013-05-07 02:24:37 PM  

Flakeloaf: maxheck: Hate to say it, but... Yeah. Can't blame 'em.

Yup. If  foreign owned killbots were flying over my country's airspace blowing up civilians I'd become quite devoted to learning how to make them stop working.


There are no friendly civilians!
 
2013-05-07 02:28:47 PM  
Hackings kind of hard.  They could try skydiving suicide bombers.
They wouldn't even need a parachute.
 
2013-05-07 02:31:06 PM  
And we're supposed to just witlessly gobble up whatever trash Pravda/RT shovels at us WHY??

[drowns subby in a vat of month-old borscht]
 
2013-05-07 02:36:42 PM  
"New "Jihadi" magazine says that Muslims all over the world should devote themselves to developing software and tools to hack into US drones and take them over or disable them, and that if they could do that really really, soon that'd be super.., "

I think that would be a worthy goal for everyone, Muslim or not, to do. Seriously, do you really want some "insect" videoing you in bed with your girlfriend? It's gonna happen, and you know it.

Actually, I'm sort of in favor of drone technology --- if EVERYONE had it. Scenario: you're black and get stopped by a cop in Beverly Hills. The conversation goes something like this:

(Cop car bullhorn) "GET OUT OF THE CAR AND ASSUME THE POSITION!!!!"
"Yes, officer." (assumes position on car hood, hands & legs out).
"WAIT! What's that goddamned big insect doing circling around us?"
"That's my personal protection drone, officer. It's recording, sound and video, everything happening here."
"WELL TURN IT OFF!"
"Sorry officer, it's on automatic mode. And as you know I can't turn it off until I get home to the control panel."
(Grumbling) "OK, did you know that your tail light was out?"
"No officer, I didn't. I'll get it fixed right away."
"OK, have a good day"

Seriously, folks, that's what we need.

/Would also be useful for when I have an argument with my wife and she claims she never said I was an asshole.
 
2013-05-07 02:38:01 PM  
Couldn't they just bribe American politicians to set up military tech labs in Muslim countries?  It seemed to work for the Chinese.
 
2013-05-07 02:39:54 PM  

SirEattonHogg: Jihadi magazine?  Sounds interesting, but I already get all of my information from Grit Magazine.



Grit Magazine is an unreliable source anyway because of its disbelief in Allah.
 
2013-05-07 02:41:11 PM  
Sooner or later whether it comes from the natural progression of Moore's Law, or some bright mathematician, or some break in quantum computing... A lot of what we currently depend on is gonna all fall down.
 
2013-05-07 02:41:57 PM  
I don't have a problem with drones. If they keep US soldiers from being out there in a war zone where you can't tell friend from foe, then fine.

The real scary thing is, that with our current technology, anything programmed can eventually be hacked. I'm rather surprised they haven't put a self destruct charge in those things because, eventually, they would get shot down. They had self destruct charges in the original Mercury space capsules and, I think in the Gemini, so if one was about to fall into foreign hands, they could blow it to bits. Every orbital rocket had a self destruct charge in it at the time to blow it up if it went off course.

I would think if we have such a sophisticated remote weapons system that we'd not want it to fall intact into enemy hands. What have we lost so far? Two or three?

German submariners had charges in their subs in WW2 to scuttle them and keep them from falling into enemy hands. Bomber pilots with the Norden Bomb sight were instructed to destroy it if they got shot down.

US ships with early top secret radar had, I read somewhere, instructions to destroy the radar shack if the ship was going to be lost. (The shack was high above the superstructure.)

So, I would assume it would be common sense to send a military, sophisticated drone out with a self destruct charge to blast at least the primary computer circuitry into dust.

BTW, the last time the Muslims went all jihad they pi$$ed off the Christians, who promptly started the Crusades and kicked their arses. We Christians are very good when it comes to killing 'non-believers'. They're even very good when it comes to killing over their own belief systems.

(The IRA was pretty good with terrorism in the battle over Catholicism and Protestants. They had no problem with blowing up stores and businesses full of men, women and children as an object lesson. Maybe we need to poke them with a stick and turn them loose on the Radical Muslims.)

I mean, Christians have no problem blowing up abortion clinics and slaughtering the staff. Plus, the Muslims are thoroughly pi$$ing off the Jews also and they have a reputation for kicking arse once stirred up.

So we take all of this force, combine it and unleash a Crusade like never before seen, made up of Christians and Jews and unleash it on the radical Muslims. No one fights with more determination than fanatics. The radical Islamic sect would vanish.
 
2013-05-07 02:42:21 PM  

The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves: What really sucks with Jihadi magazine is when you call them to cancel your subscription and they keep billing your credit card anyway. I HATE that.


They are  altering the deal. Pray they don't alter it any further.
 
2013-05-07 02:42:36 PM  

gja: "Yeeeeaaahhhhhhh, thanksssss Peter......
[encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com image 246x205]


I swear I work for his sister.

/was given the morning off so I can work Saturday without overtime.
 
2013-05-07 02:44:47 PM  

Abuse Liability: [rt.com image 690x388]

Do even bad journalists right this way? I'm pretty sure its common to use two separate sentences or to just not quote unreliable sources rather than use parentheses egregious manner.


I don't know how many journalists right that way, but I'm pretty sure that some do write that way.  And some of them might use parentheses IN AN egregious manner, yes.

Nice troll, by the way.
 
2013-05-07 02:46:44 PM  

Sock Ruh Tease: "Predator'); DROP TABLE Drones;--


Bobby?  Is that you?
 
2013-05-07 02:47:10 PM  
I assume it's not impossible if you have the money and time. And some of these nuts do. Chinese probably have the plans for them, as they steal tons of mil tech. If anything you can jam the communication for it. Drones hate raspberry.
 
2013-05-07 02:49:21 PM  
www.popsci.com
 
2013-05-07 02:52:48 PM  
Rik01:


BTW, the last time the Muslims went all jihad they pi$$ed off the Christians, who promptly started the Crusades and kicked their arses. We Christians are very good when it comes to killing 'non-believers'. They're even very good when it comes to killing over their own belief systems.

Troll, or just blitheringly ignorant? Anyway, there was a reason it took 8 tries to kick ass. Please don't ever run for office in Texas, you might win.
 
2013-05-07 02:56:29 PM  

roddack: Someone watched Castle last night it seems


new_york_monty: So they watch Castle too?


Came here to say this.  :D
 
2013-05-07 03:04:04 PM  

Abuse Liability: Abuse Liability: [rt.com image 690x388]

Do even bad journalists right this way? I'm pretty sure its common to use two separate sentences or to just not quote unreliable sources rather than use parentheses egregious manner.  Also, its written in english, which the article points out.  This couldn't smell any more fake.

What's really funny is I use the word *right* instead of write and left out *in an* before egregious when criticizing this paper's grammar.  Then again, I've never claimed to be a journalist.


Looks like you spend as much on editors as journalists do.

I keed...
 
2013-05-07 03:04:10 PM  

Rik01: I don't have a problem with drones. If they keep US soldiers from being out there in a war zone where you can't tell friend from foe, then fine.

The real scary thing is, that with our current technology, anything programmed can eventually be hacked. I'm rather surprised they haven't put a self destruct charge in those things because, eventually, they would get shot down. They had self destruct charges in the original Mercury space capsules and, I think in the Gemini, so if one was about to fall into foreign hands, they could blow it to bits. Every orbital rocket had a self destruct charge in it at the time to blow it up if it went off course.

I would think if we have such a sophisticated remote weapons system that we'd not want it to fall intact into enemy hands. What have we lost so far? Two or three?

German submariners had charges in their subs in WW2 to scuttle them and keep them from falling into enemy hands. Bomber pilots with the Norden Bomb sight were instructed to destroy it if they got shot down.

US ships with early top secret radar had, I read somewhere, instructions to destroy the radar shack if the ship was going to be lost. (The shack was high above the superstructure.)

So, I would assume it would be common sense to send a military, sophisticated drone out with a self destruct charge to blast at least the primary computer circuitry into dust.

BTW, the last time the Muslims went all jihad they pi$$ed off the Christians, who promptly started the Crusades and kicked their arses. We Christians are very good when it comes to killing 'non-believers'. They're even very good when it comes to killing over their own belief systems.

(The IRA was pretty good with terrorism in the battle over Catholicism and Protestants. They had no problem with blowing up stores and businesses full of men, women and children as an object lesson. Maybe we need to poke them with a stick and turn them loose on the Radical Muslims.)

I mean, Christians have no problem blowing up ...


don't worry, I'm sure by the time we've perfected the Third Variation of autnomous kill-bots we'll have all the kinks worked out.
 
2013-05-07 03:08:23 PM  

abhorrent1: DubtodaIll: Is it harder to develop weapons technology to shoot a drone down than it is to hack one?

I imagine it's hard to do either when you live in a farking cave.


But what if you had a box of scraps?
 
2013-05-07 03:15:39 PM  
Jihadi magazine? Is it just me, or does that just beg for a photoshop as a skin mag?
 
2013-05-07 03:21:26 PM  
Abuse Liability:
rt.com

Do even bad journalists right this way? I'm pretty sure its common to use two separate sentences or to just not quote unreliable sources rather than use parentheses egregious manner.  Also, its written in english, which the article points out.  This couldn't smell any more fake.

Okay, I'm confused. If Allah is "All-Wise" and "All-Mighty" why doesn't He just turn those drones around, or make them crash into the nearest cumulo-granite or something like that? I mean...why allow the drones to kill His faithful believers?
 
gja
2013-05-07 03:43:10 PM  

bopis: gja: "Yeeeeaaahhhhhhh, thanksssss Peter......
[encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com image 246x205]

I swear I work for his sister.

/was given the morning off so I can work Saturday without overtime.


Wow. That's some real fine asshatterery being pulled on you. Sorry you work for such a total POS.
 
2013-05-07 03:58:45 PM  

Abuse Liability: What's really funny is I use the word *right* instead of write and left out *in an* before egregious when criticizing this paper's grammar. Then again, I've never claimed to be a journalist.


I wuz gonna hand out a five minute grammar penalty but I'll let it slide. This time.
 
2013-05-07 04:00:33 PM  
I just finished Bioshock 1, so I'm getting a kick out of this.

/Poor bastard followed me around for a large portion of the game, then decided to go up against a stationary turret. I almost named him too :(
 
2013-05-07 04:06:22 PM  

meanmutton: DubtodaIll: Is it harder to develop weapons technology to shoot a drone down than it is to hack one?  Of course you do get a free drone if you figure out how to hack it.  But at that point you become to monster you're fighting.

I'm pretty sure that it's not the mere use of drones that has caused them to take up arms.


MY uderstanding is there are often plenty of arms to take up off the ground after a drone attack, amoung other body parts.

so maybe it is.
 
2013-05-07 04:50:46 PM  

DannyJunior: [www.wired.com image 624x351]


Thank you.

/Leaving satisfied (so already you're way better than my ex).
 
2013-05-07 04:56:47 PM  

Kittypie070: And we're supposed to just witlessly gobble up whatever trash Pravda/RT shovels at us WHY??

[drowns subby in a vat of month-old borscht]


That actually gave me a giggle.
 
2013-05-07 05:03:31 PM  

Stone Meadow: Abuse Liability:
[rt.com image 690x388]

Do even bad journalists right this way? I'm pretty sure its common to use two separate sentences or to just not quote unreliable sources rather than use parentheses egregious manner.  Also, its written in english, which the article points out.  This couldn't smell any more fake.

Okay, I'm confused. If Allah is "All-Wise" and "All-Mighty" why doesn't He just turn those drones around, or make them crash into the nearest cumulo-granite or something like that? I mean...why allow the drones to kill His faithful believers?



Have you ever heard of any God/god(s)/FSM/Invisible Sky Wizard stopping bad things from happening?
 
2013-05-07 05:16:51 PM  

Born_Again_Bavarian: Stone Meadow: Okay, I'm confused. If Allah is "All-Wise" and "All-Mighty" why doesn't He just turn those drones around, or make them crash into the nearest cumulo-granite or something like that? I mean...why allow the drones to kill His faithful believers?

Have you ever heard of any God/god(s)/FSM/Invisible Sky Wizard stopping bad things from happening?


Of course not...

i1.ytimg.com
 
2013-05-07 05:23:18 PM  

Abuse Liability: [rt.com image 690x388]

Do even bad journalists right this way? I'm pretty sure its common to use two separate sentences or to just not quote unreliable sources rather than use parentheses egregious manner.  Also, its written in english, which the article points out.  This couldn't smell any more fake.


Youre righting... its too bad too be sirius.
 
2013-05-07 09:14:33 PM  

real_headhoncho: Kittypie070: And we're supposed to just witlessly gobble up whatever trash Pravda/RT shovels at us WHY??

[drowns subby in a vat of month-old borscht]


That actually gave me a giggle.


Borscht the way my ma used to cook it is ass soup. I hate that shiat. Farking peppercorns.

/ma's not a Russky
 
2013-05-07 10:36:29 PM  
COD Black Ops II
 
2013-05-07 10:48:22 PM  

Abuse Liability: PC LOAD LETTER: Abuse Liability: Do even bad journalists right this way?

Sigh...

Just so you're aware, I corrected myself a few posts down from the one you cited after realizing my mistake.  Did you miss that post or were you just so very eager to correct me that you didn't finish reading the thread before you could jump all over it?


Missed it. I will cancel the missile launch. This time...
 
2013-05-08 12:16:08 AM  
Worst. Gatefold. Evar.

/Virgin of the Month?
//only 72 of them
 
gja
2013-05-08 12:41:57 AM  

felching pen: Worst. Gatefold. Evar.

/Virgin of the Month?
//only 72 of them


encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com
 
2013-05-08 05:45:03 AM  

Fano: abhorrent1: DubtodaIll: Is it harder to develop weapons technology to shoot a drone down than it is to hack one?

I imagine it's hard to do either when you live in a farking cave.

But what if you had a box of scraps?


Well if you're Tony Stark , maybe..
 
Displayed 90 of 90 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report